IIS and Apache

Is there any posssible way that I can use Internet Information Service Instead of Apache to access isqlplus webpage? Thanx!

There is both a version of PHP and mySQL for Windows. There
is no need to run two servers at the same time and I would not run
it off the same machine unless you plan on isolating the two
servers on the machine through VMWare or a similar solution and
this is assuming you would have dual ethernet ports on your
server.

Similar Messages

Roles of IIS and Apache services in HFM.

Hi,
Can any one tell me the roles of Apache and IIS services pertaining to HFM.
when i open the httpd.conf file of apache, it says port values changed from 80 to 19000,
i can access workspace on 19000, as well as on 45000. is it because of Apache or IIS?
i am unable to track the flow of the processes,
Any help would be appreciated.

The role of IIS is your choice. It depends on what web server you want to use. In this case, you chose the Apache web server, which IMO, is much easier to deal with and configure, not to mention much more stable, than IIS5 or 6.
Now, HFM and Smartview (asp.net application) are hosted using IIS. The only role it looks like IIS will be playing in your configuration will be that of hosting both of these.
Do not forget to go to the httpd.conf file for the Apache web server (located under LocalDrive:\Hyperion\common\httpservers\apache\...\conf\) and make sure an entry is set in there for a proxy redirect to the hfm.conf file)
Then under the same folder, the hfm.conf file should have listed the url to your hfm server. Sometimes even under automatic configuration, this file is not properly configured, and it lists the redirect to go to the Workspace server, which will never work because it is not the hfm server usually.

Get Error on AM 7.0 do SSO on MS IIS 6.0 and Apache 2.0x

Hi...
I install AM 7.0/Sun Web 6.1 on Window (Java ES4). And I try to setup SSO between MS IIS 6.0 and Apache 2.0. I don't know how config in the AM by using amserver (web admin).
I already complete install Policy Agent for MS IIS and Apache 2.0 and both of web was protected.
I get the error msg on AM dubug log below :
IIS :
2006-06-26 22:56:18.376 Debug 3876:157ae90 AuthService: HTTP Status = 200 (OK)
2006-06-26 22:56:18.376 Debug 3876:157ae90 AuthService: Http::Response::readAndParse(): No content length in response.
2006-06-26 22:56:18.376 Error 3876:157ae90 AuthService: AuthService::processLoginStatus() Exception message=[Authentication Failed!!] errorCode='107' templateName=login_failed_template.jsp.
2006-06-26 22:56:18.376 Error 3876:157ae90 PolicyEngine: am_policy_evaluate: InternalException in AuthService::processLoginStatus() with error message:Exception message=[Authentication Failed!!] errorCode='107' templateName=login_failed_template.jsp and code:3
2006-06-26 22:56:18.376 Warning 3876:157ae90 PolicyAgent: am_web_is_access_allowed()(http://w2k3.sunth.com:81/index.html, GET) denying access: status = Access Manager authentication service failure
2006-06-26 22:56:18.376 Debug 3876:157ae90 PolicyAgent: am_web_is_access_allowed(): Successfully logged to remote server for GET action by user unknown user to resource http://w2k3.sunth.com:81/index.html.
2006-06-26 22:56:18.376 Info 3876:157ae90 PolicyAgent: am_web_is_access_allowed()(http://w2k3.sunth.com:81/index.html, GET) returning status: Access Manager authentication service failure.
2006-06-26 22:56:18.376 Debug 3876:157ae90 PolicyAgent: HttpExtensionProc(): status after am_web_is_access_allowed = Access Manager authentication service failure (3)
2006-06-26 22:56:18.376 Error 3876:157ae90 PolicyAgent: HttpExtensionProc(): status: Access Manager authentication service failure (3)
Thank you very much for your support
Wut

Hi ,
I was installed and configured policy agent successfully.while i am trying to access the application url i am getting following error.
I am using IIS6.0 and access manager 7.1.
Error 2824:15b9918 AuthService: AuthService::processLoginStatus() Exception message=[Application user ID is not valid.] errorCode='107' templateName=login_failed_template.jsp.
2009-03-10 00:03:05.828 Error 2824:15b9918 PolicyEngine: am_policy_evaluate: InternalException in AuthService::processLoginStatus() with error message:Exception message=[Application user ID is not valid.] errorCode='107' templateName=login_failed_template.jsp and code:3
2009-03-10 00:03:05.828 Warning 2824:15b9918 PolicyAgent: am_web_is_access_allowed()(http://fcs-ylwkuzfoz1q.ramesh.com:99/website.html, GET) denying access: status = Access Manager authentication service failure
2009-03-10 00:03:05.828 Debug 2824:15b9918 PolicyAgent: am_web_is_access_allowed(): Successfully logged to remote server for GET action by user unknown user to resource http://fcs-ylwkuzfoz1q.ramesh.com:99/website.html.
2009-03-10 00:03:05.828 Info 2824:15b9918 PolicyAgent: am_web_is_access_allowed()(http://fcs-ylwkuzfoz1q.ramesh.com:99/website.html, GET) returning status: Access Manager authentication service failure.
2009-03-10 00:03:05.828 Debug 2824:15b9918 PolicyAgent: HttpExtensionProc(): status after am_web_is_access_allowed = Access Manager authentication service failure (3)
2009-03-10 00:03:05.828 Error 2824:15b9918 PolicyAgent: HttpExtensionProc(): status: Access Manager authentication service failure (3)
2009-03-10 00:03:05.828 Debug 2824:15b9918 PolicyAgent: OnSendResponse(): HTTP Status code is 500
can any one please help me to resolve this.
Thanks
Ramesh Kumar GV

Installing Coldfusion 9 and Apache 2.2 on Windows Server 2008 R2 Standard

I'm having issues getting ColdFusion 9 working with Apache 2.2 on Windows Server 2008 R2 Standard.
The server is brand new and it's a fresh install of Apache and ColdFusion 9.
Having installed Apache, I tested the web server and it was working fine, so I proceeded to install ColdFusion 9. I attempted to restart the Apache server through the Apache Service monitor, only to get the error dialog box 'The requested operation has failed'.
On closer examination of the Windows error log, I saw the following error:
The Apache service named reported the following error: >>>
httpd.exe: Syntax error on line 488 of C:/Program Files (x86)/Apache Software Foundation/Apache2.2/conf/httpd.conf: Cannot load C:/ColdFusion9/runtime/lib/wsconfig/1/mod_jrun22.so into server: The Apache service named is not a valid Win32 application.
I updated the ColdFusion installation to 9.0.1 in case there was an issue with version 9.0 and Apache. Still no joy.
After a bit of research, I thought perhaps there was an issue with the mod_jrun22.so file (since when I commented out the reference to that file from the Apache config file, the Apache HTTP server started without any problem). I tried replacing the mod_jrun22.so with the 32 bit version (extracted from the wsconfig.jar file), but that made no difference either.
I have tried a number of things. I have run wsconfig and uninstalled all web server connectors and then re-created them.
I have to use Apache and IIS is not an option (I use rewrite rules extensively in an existing live installation and have many sites set up in a vhosts file), so please - no suggestions to use IIS instead.
The system requirements on http://www.adobe.com/sea/products/coldfusion/systemreqs/ state that Coldfusion 9 will work with Apache 2.2.17 and later on Windows 64 bit, so why am I having issues with a brand-new installation on a 'virgin' server?
Any help would be much appreciated. I have spent hours trawling the Web for solutions.

I missed an important detail in my opening post. My Coldfusion 9 version is 64 bit - not 32.
OK. Simple solution to this. I'll put it here for other peoples' reference.
To cut a long story short, after phoning Adobe support this morning I was told that you can't run a 64 bit version of ColdFusion with a 32 bit web server. In essence, the web server software and the ColdFusion server software must be the same - either 32 or 64 bit.
Apache is only officially released as a 32 bit version, but there is a 64 bit unofficial version available from http://www.blackdot.be/?inc=apache/binaries, so I downloaded that and installed it, based on the instructions at http://www.elxis.org/guides/developers-guides/64bit-apache-php-mysql-windows.html.
Once I'd installed the 64bit version of Apache, the installation of Coldfusion 9 64 bit went smoothly and all appears to be working just fine now (well, I can get to the ColdFusion Administrator page and I have successfully updated the server software to ColdFusion 9.0.1).
The fact that you can't mix different 'bit' versions of software in this way may be obvious, but it wasn't obvious to me. Having been an early adopter of a 64 bit version of Vista on my own PC, I never experienced these kind of problems before. Software installed itself into the corresponding locations on my PC without any problem and just worked. This is the first time I've run into this problem.
Unfortunately, there doesn't appear to be any information regarding this very important requirement on the system requirements pages, so I suggested to the support engineer that he may want to make the recommendation that the page is amended to clarify the situation: e.g.
IMPORTANT: 64 bit versions of ColdFusion require 64 bit versions of web server software to function. You can not mix 32 bit and 64 bit versions of web servers and ColdFusion server.
Hope this helps someone else out.

WebLogic and Apache

Hi,
          We are developing an application using WebLogic ejb and servlet and we
          are planning to use Apache as the HTTP server. Are there any know
          issues about this combination?
          According to the manual, the mod_proxy of Apache can be used to link
          Apache and Weblogic. Has anybody done that?
          Thanks,
          Cecil Pang
          [email protected]


This doesn't sound like a definitive answer. Are you saying we will NOT
          support you if you use Apache?
          Should it work? What are people doing wrong? The answer below isn't
          much help IMHO.
          Prasad Peddada wrote:
          >
          > At this point we don't have plugins for Apache. We have plugins for NES, IIS only.
          >
          > Thanks
          > Prasad
          >
          > HBO wrote:
          >
          > > Barbara, thanks for the reply.
          > >
          > > So, are we saying that we should not use Apache with Weblogic Server? I
          > > browsed through the discussion groups and I found no definitive answer to this
          > > question. How about folks from BEA/Weblogic? What is your recommendation?
          > >
          > > At this point, we can either go with Apache or Netscape HTTP server. But we
          > > would like to use Apache unless there are issues in linking it to Weblogic
          > > Server.
          > >
          > > Any advice will be appreciated.
          > >
          > > Cecil Pang
          > > 10 Dimensions Technologies Inc.
          > > [email protected]
          > >
          > > Barbara Singer wrote:
          > >
          > > > Hello:
          > > >
          > > > We have tried to setup the exact configuration but with no success to date.
          > > > We are using WebLogic Application Server 4.51 and Apache by
          > > > Stronghold/C2Net. However, this has not worked with the standard Apache
          > > > distrubution either.
          > > >
          > > > /bas
          > > > HBO <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
          > > > > Hi,
          > > > >
          > > > > We are developing an application using WebLogic ejb and servlet and we
          > > > > are planning to use Apache as the HTTP server. Are there any know
          > > > > issues about this combination?
          > > > >
          > > > > According to the manual, the mod_proxy of Apache can be used to link
          > > > > Apache and Weblogic. Has anybody done that?
          > > > >
          > > > > Thanks,
          > > > > Cecil Pang
          > > > > [email protected]
          > > > >
          From Tom Gerber (Surnames: Archer, Knaeble, Lahiff, Mooney, Preisen,
          Sexton)

CF + Flex 2.0.1 + Server 2003 + (IIS? Apache? My/MS SQL?)

I've been playing with CF/Apache2.2/Flex2.0.1 for a few
months and I finally bit the bullet and bought it all
(CF/Flex/Server 2003)...and F8 and PSCS2...to finish my,
unfortunately one-and-only-serious computer (dual 200-series
Opteron). So, until now, I've used the trials of Flex/CF on what I
thought would be the cat's *** OS (XP64) but it blows (sorry MS:()
so I bought Server 2003. After going through the rigamaroll of
registering for the 180 trial originally, I removed 2003 fairly
quickly. But it seems, according to spec, to be the best choice, 32
bit, for CF.
I've been using a combination of Apache2.2 and MySQL 5 (with
the hotfixes). But now that I have spent my unborn child's RESP
deposit, I want to make sure I'm doing it the right way.
My PLAN is to do the build like this, and I'd really
appreciate any feedback, because over the last few months, I've
found that many things can go wrong.
Server 2003, turn off IIS. Run Apache 2.2. Run CF under that
(Standard edition CF MX7.0.2). And the scary part, never even SEEN,
let alone used, is MS SQL, the free/4Gb limit version.
I don't know if I would be better off to scrap Apache,
because it's been bullet proof for me for years with PHP and MySQL,
and now with CF/MySQL. But what would the best 'occasionally minor
production, mostly non-critical/development' setup be for a Web
Server. I'm not an expert, and I know squat about IIS.
I also would (in ignorance) assume MS SQL is going to run
much better on IIS, and might even not work properly under Apache.
Any thoughts on this would be greatly appreciated. I've
everything still in the boxes for the worst case (take it back and
get 'this') scenario.
Would I be saving myself some grief if I asked a pro to come
in and do it, for a fee?
It's strictly for my personal development at this stage, but
I'd like to get some jobs, maybe hosting 1-2 semi-serious apps that
in one case at least (for my employer), will need to be secure
(Financial services regulation for a Members-only Site, i.e.,
sensitive financial data entered on a pre-production server at work
for which my system would serve as the development system, most
likely with live data).
My PERSONAL aim is a fully db-driven, fully-Flex/F8 and fully
CF set of sites, along the lines of hosting the pet projects I have
for my photographer friends. I want my galleries to be among the
best on the net, bar none.
Sorry for the very long post, I am just staring at all these
boxes, and am afraid to even open Server 2003 or look into IIS/MS
SQL until I hear from some of you who might have something pithy to
say.
Thanks for baring with me.
Shawn.

>>That data base is fine for a development environment.
Thanks edbrendel.
So, since I am able to run Apache 2.2 as I want to, would I
be better of to use MySQL 5 or MS SQL Express if I want it to be
largely development, but also for my own stuff (my galleries etc.)
actually running pages served to the web?
I know of the technotes, a couple of them (incl. the MySQL
note on installing V. 5 as a datasource and all that), but never
saw that one...so thanks very much. I've manually added the Apache
2.2 file line in httpd.conf and added the file in the config area,
which always worked in the past with XP Pro and XP64...hope it does
with 2003 I had 2003 server when I first started playing, it was a
nightmare, I hope now that I've bought everything I can wrap my
head around it!). I just make sure I don't try to configure CF
until after manually adding the files, and changing the Apache
config file and restarting. Then I go into the administrator for
the first time.
Shawn

Adding Server Behavior Call Virtual() but I am on IIS not Apache

When I add a new server behavior I get "virtual('parts%tracker/Connections/PartsTrackerDB.php')" at the top of the page, but my server is IIS not apache, so I am thinking the virtual() function is incorrect. As it is now I get a HTTP 500 error when trying to load the page.
How do I fix this? Isn't there somewhere to tell DW to us IIS functions not Apache?
I'm on DW CS5.5.

Ben, thank you for your reply. I have php interpretation on the server. In fact, if I change virtual() to require() it works just fine. It is my understanding that virtual() is an apache specific call. I have googled this and i have found several articles that detail this problem. They say, I should be able to select between an apache and IIS call but I havent found one that details the steps to do that. I can make it work by manually adjusting the code, but I know there is a setting Im missing that will make it automatic.

Remote desktop and apache

remote desktop and apache.
There are times I feel that someone is looking over my shoulder, and changing my settings and controlling me.
I would like to at least be able to communicate with them so I can ltarn. I also want to be able to monitor and have some say so as to what they are doing to my computer.
Thank you

Thanx for your reply.
I should have stated that this is my personal computer and if any one should be the administrator I would think it would be me.

Problems when using shared instances of struts and apache-commons?

I found this worrisome statement on this page (http://struts.apache.org/1.3.8/userGuide/configuration.html) regarding sharing jar files across multiple applications:
<i>When a class is loaded from a shared class loader, static variables used within that class become global as well. This can cause inter-webapp conflicts when the underlying code assumes that the statics are global only within a particular web applicaiton (which would be true if the class was loaded from the webapp class loader). There are many cases where the framework, and the Commons libraries it relies on, use static variables to maintain information that is presumed to be visible only within a single web application. <b>Sharing these JAR files can cause unwanted interactions, and probably cause incorrect behavior</b>.</i>
For those of you currently using Struts and Apache Commons (and perhaps other open source libraries) have you run into any issues when sharing the jars amongst multiple applications?
I would like to avoid having multiple applications loading their own copies of these libraries, for obvious reasons. However, if there are issues with doing so, I may have to relax that position.

To answer my own questions, while we didn't run into any issues with sharing Struts, it may be a good idea to incorporate the libraries directly into the web app if suspicious behaviour is observed by the application.
Also, the taglib definitions could not be loaded from the referenced jar files - these had to be placed into the WEB-INF directory, which introduces a synchronization problem - you could conceivably have different versions of the tld's and the base libraries.

Upgrade PHP and Apache on 10.6.8

I'm thinking of upgrading PHP and Apache that were installed as part of 10.6.8 (Snow Leopard) to their current versions.
How do I do it?
- nello

I posted links for creating a Macintosh, Apache, MySQL, PHP (mamp) stack on delicious:
http://www.delicious.com/nlucchesi/tag_bundle/mamp

Tomcat 4.0 and Apache 2.0.35

Hello,
I am trying to install mod_jk or mod_webapp.so with Tomcat 4.0 and Apache 2.0.35, running on Windows XP Professional. When I try to start Apache, it fails to see it the new module in the modules/ directory, even though it's most definitely there. Anybody have any thoughts?

The Tomcat 4 has different settings compared to the previous releases (Tomcat 3.3.x and Tomcat 3.2.x). If the previous releases use mod_jk.dll and/or mod_jk.so, the version 4 uses different modules. I have obtained the following from the server.xml file from Tomcat 4.0.3.
The MOD_WEBAPP connector is used to connect Apache 1.3 with Tomcat 4.0
as its servlet container. Please read the README.txt file coming with
the WebApp Module distribution on how to build it.
(Or check out the "jakarta-tomcat-connectors/webapp" CVS repository)
To configure the Apache side, you must ensure that you have the
"ServerName" and "Port" directives defined in "httpd.conf". Then,
lines like these to the bottom of your "httpd.conf" file:
LoadModule webapp_module libexec/mod_webapp.so
WebAppConnection warpConnection warp localhost:8008
WebAppDeploy examples warpConnection /examples/
The next time you restart Apache (after restarting Tomcat, if needed)
the connection will be established, and all applications you make
visible via "WebAppDeploy" directives can be accessed through Apache.

Configuring tomcat and apache on the same system

i need to configure tomcat and apache on the same system.
first i have configured apache and it is working well.
Next is have configured tomcat and it is working well.
i need to interlink tomcat and apache. so i downloaded jk connector and i have configured it.
i gave an entry in the httpd.conf as
Include /tomcat/conf/auto/mod_jk.conf
i have copied the file mod_jk.so to /usr/local/apache/libexec/
went i start apache after the entry is given it gives the error like this
cannot load /usr/local/apache/libexec/mod_jk.so into server: ld_so.1. /usr/local/apache/bin/httpd: fatal : libgcc_s.so.1 : openfailed : no such file or directory in linux
please help to configure this.
i have done every thing as it is in apache.org documentation. please give the complete configuration. some say that tomcat is not compiled according to apache1.3. but i configure jk connector as --with-apxs=/usr/local/apache/bin/apxs
send me the reply
thankqs in advance

Hi,
I'm working in a linux machine and choose to use also two different users. Of course I'm using two different ORACLE_HOME directories.I think that the best approach.Just a question ,are you keeping the "GROUP" same or different?
Anand

PHP and Apache, Bah Humbug

Setting up PHP and Apache, I was following this: http://developer.apple.com/mac/articles/internet/phpeasyway.html
I did the step to turn on "web sharing", and the "your computers website" link opened up the local page no problem. When I copy and pasted the content in "enabling PHP in apache" to terminal, I thought it worked... but now neither of the links work. Both say something like "Firefox can't establish a connection to the server at....". Any ideas?

Safari says this:
Safari can’t connect to the server.
Safari can’t open the page “http://192.168.1.100/” because Safari can’t connect to the server “192.168.1.100”.
I tried restarting apache with "sudo /usr/sbin/apachectl restart", but no luck, still get same messages in browsers.
The computer's site (not personal) DID work when I started following the tutorial, but I only got half way through. I believe it stopped working when I copy/pasted the part from the tutorial. Any ideas? Can I completely reboot the process somehow?

Ssh, sshd, and Apache Enable OpenSSL pkcs11 Engine by Default on T4, T4+ Platforms (18762585, 18764604)

Hi,
so I followed the advice in ssh, sshd, and Apache Enable OpenSSL pkcs11 Engine by Default on T4, T4+ Platforms (18762585, 18764604) - Oracle® Solari… and turned off UseOpenSSLEngine in /etc/ssh/sshd_config (Solaris 11.2 x86, AES-NI capable Intel CPU)…
Now dtrace shows me this:
root@sol112:~# ps -ef | grep ssh
raider 18807 18806   0 03:02:43 ?           0:00 /usr/lib/ssh/sshd
root@sol112:~# dtrace -n 'pid$target:::entry { @[probemod, probefunc] = count(); }' -p 18807
libcrypto.so.1.0.0                                  AES_encrypt                                                  481299
libcrypto.so.1.0.0                                  _sse_AES_encrypt_compact                                     481299
sshd                                                ssh_ctr_inc                                                  481299
Honestly, I was expecting AES-NI and not SSE calls… Could someone please tell me what's wrong?
root@sol112:~# nm /lib/openssl/default/libcrypto.so.1.0.0 | grep -i aesni
[1302] |   1406040|        52|OBJT |LOCL |0    |21     |aesni_128_ctr

Upgrading to PHP 5 on Tiger and Apache 1.3

I need a little help with configuring php on my local server. I love XHTML/CSS and a bit of php, WordPress, and Rails - but I'm terrible at this server stuff. I'm petrified of screwing my configuration.
I'm running everything from the default OS X Apache server (I'm on Tiger OS X 10.4.10). I prefer using the internal server to all-in-one apps like MAMP and Locomotive. I have phpMyAdmin v2.10.2, MySQL v5.0.24a, and I think I'm running php 4.4.7 (typing php -v whilst in my document root in terminal returns version 4.4.7).
I now want to use the latest version of php. However, I can't remember if I upgraded php when I was installing MySQL etc. If not, is it possible that I installed the latest version, and I'm just not using at the moment (which could be why terminal is saying it's version 4.4.7)? Is there anyway to check for dormant versions of php or to switch over to running a different version?
If I don't have it, I need to install it. Is there an easy way of doing this via an installer? Is there anything I need to watch-out for whilst I'm attempting this feat?
Also, does Leopard bring many advancements on the server front, i.e. Apache 2, php 5, MySQL etc, which might save me some hassle if I just go through the inevitable OS upgrade sooner rather than later?
Any help is much appreciated.

I now want to use the latest version of php. However, I can't remember if I
upgraded php when I was installing MySQL etc. If not, is it possible that I
installed the latest version, and I'm just not using at the moment (which could
be why terminal is saying it's version 4.4.7)? Is there anyway to check for
dormant versions of php or to switch over to running a different version?
Well you could try this in terminal:
<pre style="font-family: monospaced;">locate php</pre>
It should show you nearly everything associated with php. As far as what the php version command lists this only picks up the CLI version of php not necessarily whats running on the web server. throw a php file in your webroot with the following code in it to see what the server is using:
<pre style="font-family: monospaced;"><?php phpinfo(); ?></pre>
That will give you the lowdown on what Apache is configured with. this is goign to depend on what mod_php is being used.
Generally i wouldnt upgrade anything that lives in the system as you never know if it might get overwritten or updated when a system update comes down from apple. A better practice is to install the version you want to use to /usr/local/<dirname> so that the installations are isolated and manageable.
If I don't have it, I need to install it. Is there an easy way of doing this via
an installer? Is there anything I need to watch-out for whilst I'm attempting
this feat?
I generally use the php packages from www.entropy.ch just so i dont have to bother with compiling. My versions of Ruby, Apache 2.0.x and Apache 2.2.x i compiled myself, along with an upgraded version of Python and alot of other libraries.
Then you can jsut make some changes to configuration files to use the versions you want. However if you use the entropy.ch packages of php as i suggested the installer takes care of the configuration changes for you. Jsut make sure you grab the one for the proper version of apache youre going to be using it with.
Additionally you could always get Mac/DarwinPorts - whatever its called now... this is a package manager like apt-get or yum under linux. It fetaches the package for you from a repository, and installs it. I dont use these because they use a different dir structure than standard Darwin - ie. the create the /opt folder and install under this. I dont really like that so i dont use them - but that isnt going to cause you any problems, its jsut a preference thing.
Also, does Leopard bring many advancements on the server front, i.e. Apache 2,
php 5, MySQL etc, which might save me some hassle if I just go through the
inevitable OS upgrade sooner rather than later?
I know it comes with apache 2. I think it may also come with php 5.1.6 (5.2.x is avialable though).. not sure about MySQL at all...

IIS and Apache

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for