ILD Teleservices

ILD Teleservices has placed charges on my bill - and I'm sure many others. I have contacted them via email explaining that I have not authorized the charges and did not use the services they list. We'll see. Verizon says they will not turn off phone if I don't pay, and I'm not going to, but I'm very frustrated that I've had unauthorized charges placed on my bill. It's also frustrating because I always round up, then set up automatic payment from my bank account - now all of a sudden I look like I'm delinquent in payment.
Any other opinions?
My charges were listed as:
US Credit Find-Credit REpair Mnthly Fee - what the heck is that - $9.99
Fone Right Voicemail Mnthly Fee - $14.95
Personally, if I have to keep checking my bill every month for these random things, I'm going to remove the landline. It's not like there aren't options out there these days.

Sharley wrote:
Sorry - I accidentally clicked on "report abuse" - I hope it is obviousl that your message wasn't. Cats on the keyboard.
No worries, Sharley. The kitty didn't manage to get the link clicked, and it wouldn't have been a problem if he/she had.

Similar Messages

ILD Teleservices cramming

Has anyone noticed charges for ILD Teleservices Inc? I was just dinged for a 'US Music Find' which is apparently a ringtone download. Only problem is, I don't have V* wireless, nor do I ever download ringtones.
When I called V* billing, I was surprised that I didn't have to wait very long, maybe 2 minutes before I got a real person (she was english speaking too!). She did say that she would take care of the credit and put a block on my account for misc charges, and she even talked me into upgrading my old 30/5 to 35/35 bundle with my phone and FIOS TV. Supposedly, this will save me about $20 per month and give me more TV, but we'll see tomorrow if anything gets botched up in this order...I'm not holding my breath, but this was a nice change in experience with V* billing, at least so far...

I just got off of a 34 minute phone call with "Risha" in regards to ILD Teleservices billing. She, after speaking with 50 other people 50 different times, just figured out that if you don't pay your bill on time, Verizon will, unbeknownst to you, "slowly strip your services" until you pay your bill on time. So, ILD Teleservices takes over all of their long distance calls. However, all of the charges which appeared on my account were to telephone numbers I have never seen before, and there were SEVERAL of them. "Risha" then told me I MUST be the one making those calls because some of them are like 23 minutes long and that's too long of a call for it to be an error. When I asked if someone might be third-party billing my home phone, she just said she didn't know. When I asked to speak to someone who did know, she said, "well, this is the billing department". DUH. So, basically, I am SOL. Pay your bills on time, people, or Verizon will suck even more money out of you with shady deals with companies like ILD.

My daughter is 11 years ild, soon. Why can't I create i Apple id for her?

My daughter is 11 years ild, soon. Why can't I create i Apple id for her?

Because a law in the USA requires website operators to obtain parental permission before collecting any personal information from a child under 13, and many have simply chosen not to allow them to sign up.
(100003)

[Athlon64] RS482M4-ILD MCE remote problems

Built a htpc based on the RS482M4-ILD which is working great. The only problem I've got is that when the board is brought out of S3 standby using the MS Media Centre remote, it stops working - its like the USB ports aren't being re-initialised properly, The only way to get the remote working again is to unplug it and re-insert it.
Any ideas?
Si

Quote from: simonf7 on 20-December-05, 14:38:38
Built a htpc based on the RS482M4-ILD which is working great. The only problem I've got is that when the board is brought out of S3 standby using the MS Media Centre remote, it stops working - its like the USB ports aren't being re-initialised properly, The only way to get the remote working again is to unplug it and re-insert it.
Any ideas?
Si
Known issue with ATI southbridge USB failure in suspend. No fix yet from ATI. Its an ATI problem - its specified in release notes for mb chipset /igp driver

Ild error when upgrading from WorkShop 6.1 to 6.2

I'm trying to use WorkShop 6 update 2 to compile and link.
The options are "-compat=5 -O -instances=static -features=bool -g -xs -O0 -library=iostream,rwtools7 -liostream -mt -lCstd -lCrun -lthread -lc ...".
But link editor reports errors (seems multiply-defined):
ild: (error) NamedHookApplicationBase::__vtbl is defined in files NamedHooks.o and MessageHookEntryFilter.o
ild: (error) __RTTI__1nYNamedHookApplicationBase_ is defined in files NamedHooks.o and MessageHookEntryFilter.o
ild: (error) __RTTI__1CpnYNamedHookApplicationBase_ is defined in files NamedHooks.o and MessageHookEntryFilter.o
Previously, I used 6.1 to do the same thing, free of any error. :(
And I could not find any more about that thourgh 6.2 Release Notes.
Did I miss any thing?
Thanks so much!

Well, it's strange.
I removed "-instances=static" from compilation to test. And this time, no such error was raised any more.
In my opinion, the very characteristic of static instances linkage is that all the instances are placed under the current compilation (and are not visible outside the compilation unit), which might increase the size of the program.
But one more problem about "-lcx" occurred when I compile and link another set of C++ source files:
The error messages are:
Text relocation remains referenced
against symbol offset in file
__q_mag_sub 0x2f8 /opt/sc6.2d/SUNWspro/WS6U2/lib/libcx.a(_q_add.o)
__q_mag_sub 0x358 /opt/sc6.2d/SUNWspro/WS6U2/lib/libcx.a(_q_sub.o)
__q_mag_add 0x310 /opt/sc6.2d/SUNWspro/WS6U2/lib/libcx.a(_q_add.o)
__q_mag_add 0x344 /opt/sc6.2d/SUNWspro/WS6U2/lib/libcx.a(_q_sub.o)
<unknown> 0x50 /opt/sc6.2d/SUNWspro/WS6U2/lib/libcx.a(_q_mul.o)
<unknown> 0x94 /opt/sc6.2d/SUNWspro/WS6U2/lib/libcx.a(_q_mul.o)
<unknown> 0x9c /opt/sc6.2d/SUNWspro/WS6U2/lib/libcx.a(_q_mul.o)
<unknown> 0xac /opt/sc6.2d/SUNWspro/WS6U2/lib/libcx.a(_q_mul.o)
.stret8 0x37c /opt/sc6.2d/SUNWspro/WS6U2/lib/libcx.a(_q_add.o)
.stret8 0x148 /opt/sc6.2d/SUNWspro/WS6U2/lib/libcx.a(_q_dtoq.o)
.stret8 0xbac /opt/sc6.2d/SUNWspro/WS6U2/lib/libcx.a(_q_mul.o)
.stret8 0x11c /opt/sc6.2d/SUNWspro/WS6U2/lib/libcx.a(_q_stoq.o)
.stret8 0x3c4 /opt/sc6.2d/SUNWspro/WS6U2/lib/libcx.a(_q_sub.o)
.stret8 0xb4 /opt/sc6.2d/SUNWspro/WS6U2/lib/libcx.a(_q_utoq.o)
ld: fatal: relocations remain against allocatable but non-writable sections
The compile command is
CC -compat=5 -g -xs -library=iostream -mt -features=no%conststrings ... -lCstd -lCrun -lm -lw -lcx -lc
Still like the "ild error" we've been discussed, this kind of errors were not reported when I use lower version compiler 6.1.
What puzzles me is that there is no "-B" option in the compilation cmd. But it seems that ld tried to link "libcx.a" but "libcx.so", even "libcx.so.1" does exist under the same directory. Then I ran an experiment, I manally put "-Bdynamic" before "-lcx", the error messages remain. :(
I didn't get much result after search "-lcx" from internet. Do you know why this happens?
Thanks,
kidfire

What's with the ILD charge?

I have found countless links about this ILD company slipping charges on to Verizon phone bills without people actually asking for this service (whatever it is). Their website makes it look like a merchant type service while the charge on my bill eludes to a "Fone Right Voicemail Mthly Fee". This is a joke! Why would Verizon allow such a thing to take place is beyond me. Apparently, ILD does have legitimate contracts with the telephone companies to allow their services but sticking them on there through tricky backdoor means should never been allowed by Verizon. Of course, maybe they don't care about losing a customer who has to deal with this but I can't imagine them losing customers who pay well over a $1,000 a year in services simply to allow this company to start charging ($14.95) at will for unnecessary, unasked for services.
Please tell me there is hope to have this removed without having to drop my services altogether and switch to a cable provider.
Has anyone out there had this similar issue and any help from Verizon or is it time to switch away from a company that allows this to happen?
UpsetConsumer

PC7812,
I couldn't agree with you more about your sentiments/statements. It's crazy to see this stuff take place when it should be obvious that protective mechanisms should be in place for the consumer. I guess we're witnesses to the shaddy background deals that take place so that the big guy can make an extra buck.
Well, I have some good news to my initial post.
I contacted ILD services (who deny any immediate responsibility for the service being assigned to me) they kindly forwarded my email to Fone Right.
I contacted Fone Right and they have kindly agreed to refund two months of this service but it will take several billing months to do so. I will follow up if this actually occurs. Their reasons for why this charge occurred were erroneous and they could not substantiate who or why the service was assigned to a phone that already had this service. The person they referred to doesn't live in my home and I have never heard of them.
Moreover, I have addressed the real issue for my inconvience. I terminated my service with Verizon and have switched to Comcast triple for ALL of my services. I now have an internet connection speed that approaches 20Mps and have High Def TV to boot and all for less than what I would have paid with Verizon. Comcast has never allowed such "Add on charges" for other services not related to comcast.
Cheerfully, UpsetConsumer (not so upset anymore)
Message Edited by UpsetConsumer on 02-15-2009 03:02 PM

Contact Center and TeleService for Internal Emplooyees

Any one has information on enabling contact center and teleservice for Internal Employees?
We are planning to use for HR call center for internal employees

What version are you looking at? In R12, the contact center allows pulling up an employee record and then you can log a service request.
In 11.5.10, you can use service request form or HTML Service pages to create service request for HR Help desk requests.
You can use Zoom functionality to navigate to appropriate HR forms from SR form.

[svn] 1445: compiler: Changing all instances of "ff" to "ild" in SignatureEvaluator.

Revision: 1445
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-04-28 15:54:31 -0700 (Mon, 28 Apr 2008)
Log Message:
compiler: Changing all instances of "ff" to "ild" in SignatureEvaluator.
* Okay, okay, StringBuffer to StringBuilder.
Reviewer: Bruce
Bugs: n/a
QA: No
Doc: No
Modified Paths:
flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/as3/SignatureEvaluator.java

Good reason to use a real editor.
You're right, that does sound odd. Was the file created in Geany, or just opened that way?
... wait, here's what's going on. Geany opened a file with Unix line endings. It displayed correctly because Geany isn't stupid like Notepad, but Geany didn't convert the line endings when you closed the file because you didn't tell it to. But Vim modelines take effect as if you had typed them in after opening the file. So Vim detected that the file had Unix line endings, and opened it with fileformat=unix. Then the modeline set fileformat=dos. When you hit :w, Vim saved it with DOS line endings.
The moral of the story? Don't use modelines, and if you do, don't use them to set the file format. (Vim detects that automatically.)

RS482M4-ILD: How to boot from a USB Drive? Can't find the option in BIOS!!!

Hi!
I have a USB Pen Drive as well as External USB 2.0 HDD. I'd like to know how to enable the Boot from USB Option in my mobo: RS482M4-ILD BIOS.
I have seen everywhere but, still couldn't find the option.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
The GodFather

Hi:
I believe you need to to into the BIOS and change it to legacy mode to be able to boot from any other device than the hard drive.

Linker error: ild: (undefined symbol)

I am porting a large pack of C++ from AIX to Solaris. All the modules now passed compilation. But the linker (incremental loader) complains about undefined symbol, such as
ild: (undefined symbol) __rwstd::__rb_tree<CString,std::pair<const CString,int>,__rwstd::__select1st<std::pair<const CString,int>,CString>,std::less<CString>,std::allocator<std::pair<const CString,int> > >::iterator __rwstd::__rb_tree<CString,std::pair<const CString,int>,__rwstd::__select1st<std::pair<const CString,int>,CString>,std::less<CString>,std::allocator<std::pair<const CString,int> > >::erase(__rwstd::__rb_tree<CString,std::pair<const CString,int>,__rwstd::__select1st<std::pair<const CString,int>,CString>,std::less<CString>,std::allocator<std::pair<const CString,int> > >::iterator,__rwstd::__rb_tree<CString,std::pair<const
CString,int>,__rwstd::__select1st<std::pair<const String,int>,CString>,std::less<CString>,std::allocator<std::pair<const CString,int> > >::iterator) -- referenced in the text segment of ../Release/solaris/libSpiderWeb.a(SpiderCommand.o)
ild: (undefined symbol) void std::list<const Process*,std::allocator<const Process*> >::__deallocate_buffers() -- referenced in the text segment of ../Release/solaris/libDragline.a(SystemScope.o)
I did not explicitly use those functions for sure. However, when I link a small test program using std::list and/or std::map which had at least __deallocate_buffers after template instantiation, the linker did not complain.
Any insighgt? What could be the problem and what is the fix?
BTW I am on SunOS 5.6 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-2 and use compiler Sun WorkShop 6 2000/04/07 C++ 5.1.
Thanks a lot!
Lan

There is no Solaris 6.2. To find the Solaris version, run the command
uname -a
Probably you mean Sun Workshop (or Forte Developer) 6 update 2. (The name of the product changed mid-stream, from "Sun Workshop" to "Forte Developer", and now is "Sun Studio".)
To find the compiler version, run the command
CC -V
For Workshop 6u2, the CC version is 5.3.
For old compiler versions like this, problems with missing template definitions can usually be fixed by clearing the template cache and rebuilding. To clear the template cache, you can just remove the directory SunWS_cache, or more conservatively, run the command
CCadmin -clean
There will be a cache directory in every directory where you create .o files. You need to clean all of them.
Starting with Sun Studio 8 (C++ 5.5) in 2003, the compiler no longer uses a template cache by default. These kinds of problems no longer occur.
You really should stop using the old compiler, and get a current one. The later compilers run faster, generate code that runs faster, are more standard-conforming, support modern hardware, and have superior program development tools (compiler, debugger, performance analyzer, thread analyzer). Best of all, the current compilers are completely free for all uses. The only license is the license you click to accept when you download the product.
If you are running on Solaris 8, get Sun Studio 11 here:
[http://developers.sun.com/sunstudio/products/previous/11/index.jsp]
If you are running on Solaris 9, Solaris 10, Solaris Express, or Open Solaris, get the current release, Sun Studio 12:
[http://developers.sun.com/sunstudio/]

Ild: (Performing full relink) internal free space in undefined symbol error

I am using Sun Sparc C++ 5.4 compiler to compile some code.
I had some issues with Makefile which I have resolved successfully for test program, which has only one string and print statetments.
When I compile my program error_log.C program using Makefile, I am geting following errors.
Same file for test program works ok.
Any suggestions/pointers etc are much appreciated.
Thanks
Ravi
ERRORS:
==================================================================================
/opt/SUNWspro/bin/CC -g -compat=4 -V - YP,/ford/thishost/u/rbhave/mqrouter/lib:/usr/lib:/opt/SUNWspro/prod/lib -I/ford/thishost/u/rbhave/mqrouter/include -c error_log.c
CC: Forte Developer 7 C++ 5.4 2002/03/09
ccfe: Forte Developer 7 C++ 5.4 2002/03/09
/opt/SUNWspro/bin/CC -g -compat=4 -V -YP,/ford/thishost/u/rbhave/mqrouter/lib:/usr/lib:/opt/SUNWspro/prod/lib -I/ford/thishost/u/rbhave/mqrouter/include error_log.o -o error_log -lXm -lXt -lX11 -lstring -lipc -lutils
CC: Forte Developer 7 C++ 5.4 2002/03/09
CClink: Forte Developer 7 C++ 5.4 2002/03/09
CC: Forte Developer 7 C++ 5.4 2002/03/09
ild: (Performing full relink) internal free space in output file exhausted (sections)
/opt/SUNWspro/bin/../prod/bin/c++filt: Forte Developer 7 C++ 5.4 2002/03/09
ild: Forte Developer 7 Incremental Linker 4.0 2002/03/09
ild: Forte Developer 7 Incremental Linker 4.0 2002/03/09
ild: (undefined symbol) ErrLog_c::ErrLog_c(void) -- referenced in the text segment of error_log.o
ild: (undefined symbol) ErrLog_c::SetFileOutput(char*) -- referenced in the text segment of error_log.o
ild: (undefined symbol) operator <<(ostream&, const String&) -- referenced in the text segment of /ford/thishost/u/rbhave/mqrouter/lib/libutils.a(ini_file.o)
ild: (undefined symbol) operator <<(ostream&, const String&) -- referenced in the text segment of /ford/thishost/u/rbhave/mqrouter/lib/libutils.a(datetime.o)
ild: (undefined symbol) IsSocketUsed(const char*, const char*) -- referenced in the text segment of /ford/thishost/u/rbhave/mqrouter/lib/libipc.a(socket_recv.o)
ild: (undefined symbol) IsSocketUsed(const char*, const char*) -- referenced in the text segment of error_log.o
ild: (undefined symbol) operator >>(istream&, String&) -- referenced in the text segment of /ford/thishost/u/rbhave/mqrouter/lib/libutils.a(general.o)
ild: (undefined symbol) setsockopt -- referenced in the text segment of /ford/thishost/u/rbhave/mqrouter/lib/libipc.a(socket_recv.o)
ild: (undefined symbol) recv -- referenced in the text segment of /ford/thishost/u/rbhave/mqrouter/lib/libipc.a(socket_recv.o)
ild: (undefined symbol) bind -- referenced in the text segment of /ford/thishost/u/rbhave/mqrouter/lib/libipc.a(socket_recv.o)
ild: (undefined symbol) socket -- referenced in the text segment of /ford/thishost/u/rbhave/mqrouter/lib/libipc.a(socket_dgram.o)
ild: (undefined symbol) ErrLog_c::Rename(const ErrLogMesg_t&) -- referenced in the text segment of error_log.o
ild: (undefined symbol) sendto -- referenced in the text segment of /ford/thishost/u/rbhave/mqrouter/lib/libipc.a(socket_dgram.o)
ild: (undefined symbol) ErrLog_c::~ErrLog_c(void) -- referenced in the text segment of error_log.o
*** Error code 5
make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `error_log'
==================================================================================

Try rebuilding with -xild=off to eliminate ild from the process.
If it still doesn't link, delete the most recent .o files and try again to see how it goes.
- Rose

Complaint report about TELESERVICE warranty in Istanbul Turkey

I 'm writing a complaint to report on my Iphone5 device that i bought one from an authorized dealer of you; Istanbul Bilisim A.S Turkey Istanbul .
i bought my phone on 07/25/2013, serial number 01*******355, from Istanbul Bilisim A.S Turkey Istanbul
You can see the receipt of it attached file .
Two months later, the phone's audio output has been damaged, i called the dealer ask for the guarantee, they answered "your guarantee is not on us". They made me directly to the company named Brightstar / Teleservice .
on 10.22.2013 i send my phone in its original box to Teleservice Company with the fault information in it by cargo. ( Yurtici Cargo )
A week later, the phone was sent back to me by cargo company.
The note was added ,that they need me to uninstall the application of "find my iphone" from i cloud, i couldn't understand why it's necessary but i did what they asked for.
Following days i called the company to get the information about their decision, they said it's decided to change with the new one.
On 22/11/2013 supposedly " new "one send to my by cargo firm.
i said supposedly because the "New" device is faulty; is has rattling noise coming from it !they placed the "new"phone in the box which i send them my damaged phone
At the same day , this time, we've reached the phone which they send to the service office in person.
i said there are sounds came from "New" phone they send to me and i don' t believe that it's really "NEW"... they got the device from my hand and go away to the back room and 5 min. later came back ,then he said" we got it all right ",
I told him, i can not accept this device
They answered that they could not give original sealed box device , they gave me the information of new phones are coming them in this way from the manufacturer.
Within this information, with your permission, I want to ask you a few questions ;
1 - Is Apple firm REALLY sending Iphone devices ,under warranty change, to the authorized services in this way?
2- Is Apple firm is aware of their authorized service of Iphone devices named TELESERVICE, is sharing wrong informations with consumers , And is this behaviour accepted by Apple Company?
3- Is Apple firm aware of the comsumers bad experiences, grievances about authorized service ,named TELESERVICE, of iphone in many countries.
4- Is Apple firm aware of lots of people are injured by TELESERVICE , lots of complaints are written in internet, and ther is a facebook page named TELESERVICE VICTIMS;
" TeleService victims " https://www.facebook.com/teleservicemagdurlari?fref=ts
View on a facebook page including thousands of complaints across Turkey
5-Is Apple firm doesn't valued the reputation in Turkey , after sales satisfaction and customer loyalty of Turkey market?
i have been an Iphone user since the Iphone3 came out .I have used my Iphone3 and iphone4 model phones seamlessly but Iphone5, during warranty coverage i'm done with the service problems. It will become a pretty discouraging experience for the next telephone exchanges .
There is a change decision, issued by the competent service of mt device in the warranty period . I want them to be replaced my phone with the original sealed box a new or demand that fee refunding . With this request, the same day i delivered the device to TELESERVICE and they refused to change it with the original sealed box a new or demand that fee refunding.
Assuming that every serious and honorable company ,as wellknown as Apple firm, cares about the customer satisfaction, i want to share with you about the process i am placed in.
TELESERVICE is insisting not to change my phone with the original sealed box a new or demand that fee refunding, unfortunately, i have no chance to enter an action and wait for the consumer courts decision, and write the whole bad experience process to social media including this letter.
For the brand awareness and satisfaction sustaining ,i need you to interfere flow my problem (and the grievances of all Turkish consumers injured by TELESERVICE) They are representing Apple brand here. Thank you for your interest.
I'll be waiting for your reply ,
yours sincerely .
Bahar Ünlü, Architect,Ms. (İ.T.Ü)
<Edited by Host>

i have received an e-mail From Damla Ulber, who is Apple Account Manager in TELESERVICE Germany, including following massage, she tried to explain something about the process failures but above all offers nothing to solve the problem; here is the massage;
Dear Mrs Unlu,
In regard to your mail to arvato Bertelsmann, I would like to give you some information about your case:
As Apple’s authorized service center in Turkey, we do after sales services for Ipads and Iphones. In “non-repairable” cases, broken devices are swapped by an equivalent devices of the same model and colour. These “swaps” were sent by Apple and it is indeed correct that they were sent in a box without any accessories- not like a purchased phone or tablet from a retail store. The meaning of “swap” is like “exchange device”.
Apple has recently changed its after sales structure and opened a local warehouse in Turkey. You as a customer shouldn’t be affected by these troubles were occurring, but unfortunately shipments and services delayed and our customers had to wait longer than expected for an exchange device. We – as Teleservice – are sorry for this bad experience.
Since iOS 7, the FMIP (Find my Iphone) regulation is mostly activated by users so that in case the phone gets lost or stolen, you are able to find your phone even if it’s off. So there is no way for use by unjustified persons. However, this is avoiding a repair as well. Without your permission – means without turning off the FMIP function – our technicians can neither repair nor swap this phone with a new one. Since your IMEI changes with a swap device, it would be easy to steal a phone with warranty, bring it to service and get a new, unwanted phone “for free”. This is why we asked you to turn off FMIP.
Sound problems are the highest probability seen on Iphone 5 models and reason to swap the device since there is no chance to resolve this problem properly. Like new Iphones, Swap phones fulfill the same criteria, have the same software and – unfortunately- therefore, the same risk to be defect. In case your swap device doesn’t work properly as well, it will be swapped again and defective devices are sent to Apple. Everything sent by the customer will be sent back in the same way. This is why we are not able to provide you an original sealed boxes even if we would like you, because we basically do not have any.
We are aware of complaining pages about us and other companies in the social media you were talking about. This is of course a very bad reputation and we try our best to improve our image for the future, however good experiences are rarely shared.
This is not a defense mail, so please don’t get me wrong. I can totally understand your disappointment about our service as I am very unsatisfied about our unlucky situation as well. We would to like to offer the best service to our customers and will do our best to do so very soon since waiting devices are mostly handled.
Yours sincerely,
Damla Ülber
Apple Account Responsible

Continuous reports of R12 Oracle Teleservices experience - is it a profile issue?

We have a call center of approximately 70 agents - all work in R12 Oracle Teleservices Module. There are 2 users that continue to report issues with Oracle experience, i.e. FRM 92100, slowness, unresponsive, freezing, etc. We have reset their Windows Profile, gave them new computers, and they continue to report. They have also logged in as a different user, and they report that their issues go away. We have matched their profiles across other agents to see differences in them, but nothing is noticeable. We currently have Employee Records tied to their Oracle Profile and cannot create a second Oracle User that would tie to the same Employee Record. My question is, is there another approach that we can test to see if their issues are in fact with their Oracle Profile or is it a Windows/Computer issue? Any information, guidance shared is appreciated.

We have a call center of approximately 70 agents - all work in R12 Oracle Teleservices Module. There are 2 users that continue to report issues with Oracle experience, i.e. FRM 92100, slowness, unresponsive, freezing, etc. We have reset their Windows Profile, gave them new computers, and they continue to report. They have also logged in as a different user, and they report that their issues go away. We have matched their profiles across other agents to see differences in them, but nothing is noticeable. We currently have Employee Records tied to their Oracle Profile and cannot create a second Oracle User that would tie to the same Employee Record. My question is, is there another approach that we can test to see if their issues are in fact with their Oracle Profile or is it a Windows/Computer issue? Any information, guidance shared is appreciated.

MSI RS482M4-ILD and s-video out

I am planning on buying the RS482M4-ILD. Can I output video to my TV with s-video and still use the monitor at the same time? I am not concerned with extented desktop, I just want the video window out to my TV. Is the TV out feature with this board comparable to an external video card?
Thanks

Quote from: Xpress200 on 23-December-05, 03:24:48
Yes. It works great. I used onboard VGA only - running MCE2005 sVid --> 42" tv. looks as good - ACTUALLY better than 9800pro sVid --> TV. the xpress has built in oversacan that covers the entire screen while using MCE2005. no other vid card i've used does this... I also used an x700pro pci-E and it was same quality. i got an X2 now and will try 6600 next...
oh yeah. I use corsair XMS 1GB 3200C2PT. no issues. 1ghz HT / C2 timings. fast.

Super Talent Memory Issue - RS482M4-ILD

I just purchased an RS482M4-ILD board with 2 - 1 Gigabyte Super Talent DDR400 D32PB1GJ DIMMs. System is stable but the boot messages state that the DRAM clock is at 333mhz. The data sheet for the Super Talent states that the DIMMs runs at 2.6v. I read in couple of places on this forum that only 2.5v DIMMs can be used.
Am I using the wrong memory? ???
Which memory can I use for this mobo? (Make and part# will help immensely) ???
If I use slots 1 & 3 does the memory default to dual channel? ???
System Stats:
AMD Athlon 64 3800+
2 - 1 Gigabyte Super Talent D32PB1GJ DIMMs in DIMM slots 1 & 3.
RS482M4 A7191AMS V1.1 101505 15:40:42
Maxtor 200GB Primary
Maxtor 300GB Secondary
2 IOMagic DVD-Writers
TIA,
Mitch

What processor are you using? All older 130nm cores require 4 sticks to run at DDR 333. You will atleast have to run at a 2T timing with 4 sticks and a 90nm Venice or San Diego core.

ILD Teleservices

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for