IM-PS  top WBS settle to AUC

Dear all experts,
could you help me on the following issue?
i am working on a capital project. IM and PS modules are used.
my key users want to settle lower WBS to the superior WBS and the top WBS to one AUC when they do the monthly settlement.
i delete the IM profile in the lower WBS, and maintain the settlement rule of them.
when i do the settle i found that lower WBS settle to the superior WBS but the top WBS doesn't settle to AUC
could you tell me what's the problem.
Judy

sorry, i didn't mean to close the question, as the problem is still there.
here is what i am.
AUC is created automatically when i release the project.
if i didn't delete the IM profile, all the WBS including the top one will be settled to AUC individually.
but if i delete the IM profile of lower WBS and maintain the settlement rule manually, the lower WBS will be settled to the top WBS. but the top one will not be settled to AUC that is created automatically.
the settlement type is not AUC,but GES.
i don't think it is correct.
could someone offer me some help or suggestions?
did someone meet the same problem?
thanks in advance.
Judy

Similar Messages

  • Capital project WBS settle to AUC individually

    Dear all experts,
    please help me on the following issues.
    i am working on a capital project. Investment profile is defined and assgined to the project profile.
    the top WBS is T-09-001
    the second level WBS are T-09-001-01,  T-09-001-02,  T-09-001-03,  T-09-001-04, T-09-001-05 for example.
    the third level WBS is T-09-001-05-01.
    i do the test settlement when the project status is release. (i didn't maintain the settlement rule.)
    the result is that every single WBS is settled to a FXA (the numbers are generated automatically)
    for example
    T-09-001-01 to  FXA 1000/40047/0   30000CNY
    T-09-001-02 to  FXA 1000/40048/0   40000CNY
    T-09-001-03 to  FXA  1000/40049/0  40000CNY......
    i am not sure if it is correct or not, because it's my first time to deal with capital projects.
    if i want to settle all the sub-WBS to top WBS and the top one settled to AUC, how can i do it.
    i manually maintain the settlement rule for all the sub-WBS to top WBS and settle the project again.
    but the result is the same. i don't know where the problem is.
    please tell me how to do it or how to settle the capital projects in most cases?
    thanks a lot.
    judy

    Below was something which we had done in such case:
    1. Created a substitution rule against the WBS element, if the level of WBS >=2 substitute the Investment profile with 'Blank'. With this when ever you create a project and save it or call the substitution from menu, system would retain the investment profile on level 1 WBS and when project is released only 1 AUC is created for the project which is on level 1 WBS.
    2. Settle all other lower WBS to it's parent WBS and you can implement OSS note 211324 - CJB1: Strategy for settlement to superior WBS. Refer the below link about how this works:
    http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/PLM/ModificationnoteforStrategyforsettlementtosuperiorWBS
    Doing both the above, you would create only 1 AUC (on level 1 WBS) and finally settle all lower WBS to level 1 WBS and from there system would then automatically settle the costs to AUC fixed asset.
    Regards
    Sreenivas

  • WBS settlement wiht AUC

    Hello,
    Can anybody help to do the configuration for wbs settlement with AUC other than below mentioned configuration.
    1. New Asset class creation with line iteme settlement.
    2. Allocaiton structure added settlement with FXA.
    3. New settlement profile created with default object type FXA,document type AA and amount settlement check box activated.
    but based on above mentioned configuration i am not moving forward, kindly suggest any more configuration need for this requirement.
    Thanks for your advance help.
    Regards,
    Lakshmi.

    Hi,
    Please follow above mentioned points
    Allocation structure added settlement with FXA. -- Path - SPRO - IMG - Investment Management - Projects as Investment Measures - Settlement  -- Maintain Allocation Structures  -create on Allocation structure - and assignment - 010 -- Material & service cost -- and select - click on - source - give Cost elements - from - to
    and click on settlement cost element  - give receiver category -- FXA  - check box for By cost element -- and save it ,
    2.Maintain Settlement Profiles -- Define Settlement Profile -- XX - WBSE Settlement Profile
        select radio button - to be settled in full , give allocated structure ,
         Default object type  FXA  Asset
         select all indicators -- and give other parameter -- Document type -- AA or as per requirement
         and Assign Settlement Profile to Project Profile
    3.New Asset class creation with line items settlement     --   Investment Management  -- Projects as Investment Measures -- Master Data  --Assets under Construction  --Define Asset Classes  ==
          give- Account determination -- asset class , scr layout rule -- capital investment measure ,
    give number range  --whichever is created
    status of AuC -- select radio button -- Investment Measure
    Save it ,
    Now you can create Project -   Run -- CJ88 for settlement
    Thanking you
    Regards
    Mahesh

  • WBS settlement with AUC

    Hello,
    Can anybody help to do the configuration for wbs settlement with AUC other than below mentioned configuration.
    1. New Asset class creation with line iteme settlement.
    2. Allocaiton structure added settlement with FXA.
    3. New settlement profile created with default object type FXA,document type AA and amount settlement check box activated.
    but based on above mentioned configuration i am not moving forward, kindly suggest any more configuration need for this requirement.
    Thanks for your advance help.
    Regards,
    Lakshmi.

    Hi Lakshmi,
    There are quite a few settings to be maintained. I do not remember exact sequence of steps but here are a few pointers.
    1. Investment profile needs to be created with 'line item settlement'
    2. AUC asset class to be created and assigned to this investment profile
    3. Investment profile to be linked to project profile.
    4. Source structure to be assigned to investment profile
    There may be other steps I am missing but I hope these help.
    Also, if you mention any error that you are facing or at which point you are getting stuck, it would be helpful.
    Regards

  • WBS settlement to AUC - use original cost elements?

    Hello gurus
    We have an allocation structure which settles project WBS costs to AUC.
    The issue is that it is using a single settlement cost element for all the costs going to the AUC.
    I notice there is a tick box 'by cost element' in the 'Allocation structure:settlement cost elements' entry for FXA.
    What is the result of using this tick box?
    We would like the original cost elements in the WBS to be credited rather than the single one.
    Is this possible?
    Thanks everyone

    Hi
    - we do not have secondary cost elements posted
    - we do not use budget checking
    As I said, we would like the original cost elements against the WBS to be credited. The single one is causing problems because it posts in total to 55291 (as in the configuration) which does not reconcile back to the many cost elements posted to the WBS.
    Is this possible?
    What is the effect of the check box 'by cost element' as we do not understand the help text on this checkbox field and are not sure if this could solve the problem (or there is a downside to using this). If this is not possible we would like to know as well.
    Thanks all

  • WBS settle to AUC in error

    We have a WBS element that was set up incorrectly to settle to an AUC asset. As a result, there has already been settlement activity (CJ8G) in past, closed fiscal years. So now we have an AUC asset that should not exist. I have been reading other issues to get a better understanding of my options. What is the best approach to remove this AUC asset???
    We use a settlement variant in CJ8G to prevent this from happening (i.e. exclude from settlement) in the event a WBS element is set up incorrectly with an investment profile but one somehow was overlooked.

    Please refer to note 339973

  • WBS settlement to AuC

    Hi,
    Currently settlement postings from WBS to AuC happens to Depreciation Area 01 as well as Area A10
    .  But business want to restrict the postings to Area 10.  How can we achieve this? Where is the relevant configuration?
    Kindly help.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Ramesan

    Capital Planning during AuC

  • Need WBS split to AUC and Expanses during settlement (not %wise)

    Hi,
    We have some capital projects settling to AUC but we are also charging WBS for labor costs and travel expanses and offcouse capital costs.
    Managment wants PS team to Settle labor/travel to CCTR and Capital cost to AUC. How can WBS recognize cost elements carry expanses and Capital Costs and split them during settlment?
    expanse range: 500000-599999 travel/labor
    Capital expance range: 600000-699999 to be capitalized
    I will appreciate any clue in this regard.
    -Atif
    PS.: I am trying capital investment key at this time, so that WBS will settle only capital range in AUC.

    Hi,
    Maintain different settlement rule for WBSE with different recevier such as AUC & CTR. In settlement configuration define source structure such as CTR & AUC along with cost elements for settling the cost into different receiver.
    Hope this will help you.
    Regards,
    Rakesh Pradhan

  • Settle an AuC with investment support

    Hello Gurus,
    I have the following problem:
    I have some AuC with investment support measure assigned.
    If I settle the AuC created in prior-years the system settle the costs and the investment support to the final assets but If I try to settle an asset created this year, the system does not settle the investment support to the final asset.
    I need that when the asset under construction is created and settled to a final asset (within the same year), the investment support iis posted to the final asset aswell.
    Thanks alot for your help.
    Christine

    Normally settlement  needs to be performed twice, if the investment support measure is there.
    1) for Investment object to AUC ie WBS / IO to AUC. This called automatic /AUC settlement.
    2) From AUC to Final Asset: This is called final / periodic settlement.
    But both these settlement needs to be executed with KO88/ CJ88.

  • Block settlement to auc for downpayment

    Hi SAP Friends,
    There is a specific requirement in one of our project.
    In an investment project, advance payment is issued against a service PO with ref to WBS. The requirement is to block the settlement to AUC for this advance payment only until service entry acceptance is made. Other commitment in the WBS should go as usual without problem with regular path of setlement to AUC and from AUC to Fixed asset.
    Regards
    Srinivasan

    Hi Srinivasan,
    Please check if this could be of any help to you.
    Specify Capitalization of AUC/Down-Payment
    In this step, you determine how the system will deal with down payments on AuCs and their closing invoice during the settlement (capitalization) of the AuC. This system setting is particularly relevant for respresenting down payments from previous years in the asset history sheet.
    Standard Settings
    The system capitalizes down payments as follows in the standard system:
    If you capitalize a down payment from the previous year and the closing invoice from the current year together, the amount of the down payment is transferred with the transaction type for asset data from previous years, and only the difference between the closing invoice and the down payment is transferred with the transaction type for current acquisitions.
    Activities
    If you want to change the default setting, you must set the indicator for the capitalization of assets under construction without down payments. If this indicator is set, the system ignores down payments during the line item settlement of assets under construction. The total amount of the closing invoice is always transferred with the transaction type according to its posting year.
    SPRO -  Asset Accounting - Transactions - Capitalization of Assets under Construction - Specify Capitalization of AUC/Down-Payment
    Indicator transfer down payments from previous years
    When you set this indicator, the system ignores downpayments during the line item settlement of assets under construction. The total amount of the closing invoice is then always transferred to the capitalized asset using the transaction type based on the year of the closing invoice.
    Use
    This has the following result:
    There is an opposite effect when the indicator is not set, and you capitalize a downpayment from a previous year along with the closing invoice from the current year. In this case, the system transfers the amount of the downpayment from the previous year using a transaction type for old assets data. It transfers the difference between the total amount of the closing invoice and the downpayment using a transaction type for new acquisitions.
    Regards
    Vinayak.

  • Validation settlement to AUC or FXA from PS (CJ88)

    Hi All,
    I have an issue when doing settlement from WBS to AUC/FXA.
    Let say the project has a plant call ABCD, then i put settlement rule AUC or FXA..and doing settlement CJ88...but i could settle to AUC / FXA to different plant call CDEF . We decided not to use automatic AUC from IM, we create AUC and FXA from Asset module.
    How to validate that Project plant ABCD only could settle to AUC or FXA which have same plant..
    Cheers,
    Nies

    img-fi-spec purp ledger-tools-maintain validation/substitution rules - maintain substitution
    substitution rule under financial acc -line items
    create a substitution for doc type and get plant from WBS
    for this use substitution by exit for plant UF101
    Now write a program ZGGBS000 (config is in txn GCX2) to get plant from wherever you want

  • WBS settlement issue:Complete allocation structure A1.Message no. KD503

    hi all
    I created an WBS  600041 and through FB60 posted the JV by assigning the WBS 600041.
    Then I saw in CJI3 the posting is done and it is showing there and I created a settlement rule and gave the 100 % cost settlement on AUC and saved it. Now when I go to CJ88 and do the actual settlement and gave all the parameters for full settlement and execute it is giving the following error
    Complete allocation structure A1.Message no. KD503
    Is this problem due to cost elements? How do I go about it.please suggest.
    kind regards
    Aman

    HI,
    Check  your allocation structure OKO6 transaction. see whether your allocation structure is having the expense cost element  you posted listed in it
    OKO6- select your allocation structure-Assignments-source
    Here the GL account should be listed
    Regards,
    Radha

  • Error message KD625 during WBS settlement.

    Hello Experts,
    I am trying to settle WBS element to AUC with investment measure in the current year, which has a balance from 2006 and getting the Error Message KD625.
    Kindly suggest me the solution.
    I found the below OSS notes but not sure how relevant are these for my issue.
    1) 425601
    2) 819197
    Could anyone suggest me the solution?
    Thanks & Regards,
    Akash Patil

    Hello Gordon,
    Thanks for your reply.
    You have read my requirement correctly. Is every thing fine if I Implement note 819197?
    I am not sure what impact will be after implementing it.
    since we are settling it to the AuC investment measure.
    And I found one more note 425601. Is this note also relevant for us? I am not sure about this note. Whether we need to implement along with the note 819197.
    Please suggest me.
    Regards,
    Akash Patil

  • Posting from Top Level WBSE to AUC

    Hi Friends,
    I am facing problem in doing settlement from Top level WBSE to AUC. I feel I have done the required settings. I am not able to generate settlement rule for the top level WBSE. Please help me out. I would appreciate some screen-shot help from anyone.
    regards
    Pratap.V

    Hi,
    Captain Caveman: I want the settlement from the top level WBSE to AUC get generated automatically. My Top level WBSE has an Investment profile. AUC is created automatically only. Since the settlement rule did not get generated automatically, I tried to set the rule manually. Still the system is not allowing me to do. Top level WBSE is acc assigned.
    Steve: In my settlement profile, I have given the default object type as FXA.
    Subhrajyoti: I have checked the asset class. The asset is not blocked. Also the status of AuCi s set right.
    Thanks guys for your replies. I will do the whole process again.
    I will check and let you know the results today itself.
    thanks
    Pratap.V

  • PS WBS Settlement  (tx CJ88) / Liquidación de Elemantos PEP (tx. CJ88)

    English
    Hello, I'm in a project in which my client needs to settle WBS's to AuC.  When he does so (tx CJ88), the system is settling the WBS with the actual exchange rate (ie. 2,60 VEF per 1 USD), nevertheless my client tells me that the settelment should use the historic rate that was assigned to the material in the inventory (ie. 2,00 VEF per 1 USD).
    I think that the WBS s being settled at the current rate because CO's currency is set to VEF and not USD. If this is the case, does anyone know a way to custom WBS settlements in order for them to use historic rate?
    Thanks in advance for your help.
    Paul
    Español
    Saludos. En estos momentos mi cliente necesita liquidar elementos PEP contra AFeC (tx CJ88).  Al hacerlo, el sistema esta realizando la liquidación con la tasa actual (2,60 VEF por 1 USD), no obstante mi cliente indica que al hacer la liquidación, el sistema deberia tomar la tasa historica (por ej. 2,00 VEF por 1 USD), que fue aplicada al inventario en el momento del consumo.
    Se me ocurre que el sistema puede estar asignando por defecto la tasa actual y no la historica debido a que la moneda de la Sociedad CO es VEF y no USD.  Si este es el caso, alguien conoce alguna forma para indicarle a PS que utilice tasas hostoricas al momento de realizar la liquicaicón de los PEP's?.
    Gracias de antemano por la ayuda.
    Paul
    Edited by: Paul Hernando on Apr 9, 2010 7:20 PM

    Sorry....just found this note Note 53190 - Info: Exchange rate type in the settlement...It says even if you change the exchange rate in oko9 other than M, the system will ignore this setting,,,,so i dont think you can use historic exchange rate for settlement...

Maybe you are looking for