IM stocks reconcilation with WM stocks

Hi all ,
Upon WM implementation how are IM stocks reconciled with the WM stocks .
how is the activity of the cutover managed and what are the precautions that needs to be taken during this process.
thanks,
ksr

Hello,
Yes I agree with Ganesh. I would like to add one thing here is, you will have to use movement type 311 from non WH managed sloc to WH managed sloc transfer. If all your customisation OK then TR will be created in 921 storage type. You can then move the stock to warehouse by converting TR to TO.
Milind

Similar Messages

Report 2KEE does not reconcile with report KE5Z

Hi,
Ran report 2KEE for period 1. Now I drill down in this report to see the details. The summary in report does not reconcile with sum of it's details. Report details reconcile with KE5Z for the same period and account.
Kindly explain why 2kee summary for an account does not reconcile with it's drill down details.

Report 2KEE takes data from table GLPCT & Report KE5Z from table GLPCA

Magnetic Media is not reconciling with Payroll Reconciliation Report..

Hello Team
Can anyone help me how to proceed/what to look at if Magnetic Media is not reconciling with Payroll Reconciliation Report..
Any insight into this will be highly appreciable.
Regards
Raspreet

Hi Charlene,
The Recommended way to Reconcile you tax fomrs is as follows.
1. Take the actual 941's submitted to authority.
2. Run 941 for all Quarters using SAP Tax reporter and Reconciliation report 941 application.
3. Run W-2 in Tax reporter and take copy of W-3 and 6559
4. Run Reconciliation report using W-2 Application.
Now first match the all 941 totals for all Taxable and Taxes with W-3 total. Then match your W-3 with 6559.
Remember the totals on your final report has to match by penny to penny. If there are any 941-C take them also into consideration.
I hope this helps.
Arti

COPA reconcile with FI

Dear Experts,
My client want to reconcile COPA value fields value with FI GL.
I am planning to implement Costing based COPA.
If i will activate account based COPA as well. will it solve my problem.
regards
Vijay

Hi Vijay..!
Costing Based COPA Vs A/c Based COPA
Two forms of Profitability Analysis are supported: costing-based and account-based.
Costing-based Profitability Analysis is the form of profitability analysis that groups costs and revenues according to value fields and costing-based valuation approaches, both of which you can define yourself. It guarantees you access at all times to a complete, short-term profitability report.
Account-based Profitability Analysis is a form of profitability analysis organized in accounts and using an account-based valuation approach.
The distinguishing characteristic of this form is its use of cost and revenue elements.
It provides you with a profitability report that is permanently reconciled with financial accounting.
You can also use both of these types of CO-PA simultaneously.
Recommendations for using the COPA Types
u2022     It is strongly recommended, however, that you do not activate both types of CO-PA.
u2022     The major reason being is that you will have significant table size impacts.
u2022     You must be careful with account based CO-PA as this creates additional line items in the existing CO tables of COEP (actual), COEJ (plan), COSP & COSS (summary records).
u2022     Hence if you want to do any cost center reporting, say, from any of these existing tables you will run the risk that performance will be degraded by these additional and unnecessary records.
u2022     The only advantage of account based over costing based CO-PA is it's ability to
automatically reconcile back to FI, in much the same manner as you would reconcile
cost center accounting back to FI.
u2022     However you don't have the flexibility in account based CO-PA to perform valuations using product cost estimates etc. as you do in costing based CO-PA.
u2022     If the reason you were advised to turn on account based CO-PA as well as costing based was to facilitate reconciliation, it is suggested that you look at alternatives that won't have the same negative impacts that turning on account based would have. In addition to the serious table space issues, it is not that easy to turn on and off account based at will (especially in production).
u2022     Instead what you should look at doing is creating a series of reports that enable you to
reconcile costing based CO-PA back to CCA/PCA and FI, if this is required.
u2022     The complexity of the costing based functionality you have used will determine the complexity of the reports that will be needed to reconcile back, but it can be done without turning on
account based CO-PA.
As per you r client requirement you can go for Costing based PA.
Rds,
Anil

In attempts to reconcile with the recent updates to Apple products/iTunes accounts, I have changed my password and settings on all of my Apple devices. Still, all of them repeatedly ask me to sign in, and sign in again, to my AppleID.

I have a Macbook (2011), an iPad 3, and an iPhone 5. My son also has an iPhone 4, which logs in under my AppleID. I spent my entire day off yesterday trying to reconcile the issues with our devices. I had not used my Macbook for a couple of weeks, as I had had to replace my charger for the fifth time in three and a half years-different story for a different time (My last Macbook's supposedly inferior charger lasted the duration of my ownership of it and then some, by the way.). Anyway, my Macbook repeatedly asked me to log in, alternately, to my iCloud and then my FaceTime. No sooner would I enter my password for iCloud than it would ask for my Facetime password; I entered the password for Facetime, and the iCloud password would be requested, so on. The text boxes would not go away. Other programs' windows would not open in front of them. I searched here and other forums, having moved a FaceTime password request to the far right of my screen & minimizing my Safari window, so as to fully see my search results. I turned my Mail off and on, no luck. I logged out of iCloud completely, to no avail. Finally, I changed my AppleID password. This seemed to work...for my Macbook. It no longer asks me for my passwords. Now, however, I cannot even update apps on my iPad, despite the fact that I have logged out of and back into my iCloud on my iPad. This is NOT why have staunchly defended my choice to use strictly Apple products for the last decade. I feel like a Windows user. I was going to upgrade to the iPhone 6 Plus when my current contract is up in a couple of months, but if this is the future of Apple....
Anyway, if anyone has answers or a solution, I would greatly appreciate the guidance. So disappointed in Apple right now.

Go to Settings>iCloud, tap Delete Account, provide the password for the old ID when prompted to turn off Find My iPhone, then sign back in with your new credentials. If all you did was modify your existing ID rather than creating and entirely new ID, you can choose Delete from My iPhone when prompted. Your data will still be in iCloud and will download to your phone when you sign back in.

Visual voice mail does not sync/reconcile with icon notification

new to blackberry... have the Tour 9630 and so far am very happy but am having a few issues with visual voice mail:
1) the visual voicemail inbox does not register new voicemails... I continually have to manually "resync mailbox," even if I wait 20-30 mins for a voicemail to register once I get a standard notification
2) Once I listen to a visual voicemail and delete it, the notification icon on the Home screen does not reconcile that they've been listened to.... even if I've listened to them hours ago.
3) I'd rather not receive 3 notifications of a new voicemail in my main inbox... I get notification from 1) the icon on the Home screen, 2) from the "new Voicemail" message, and (when working) 3) from visual voicemail. I've looked but can't find how to set a preference to filter such redundant messages.
any help would be appreciated! Thank you!
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Hi.
I would do a battery pull and see it the icon returns to normal.
I would then call your BB and leave a VM. See if you can clear the icon when you clear the VM.
The other options is calling Verizon and ask them to reset your voice mail options and clear all messages.
Let us know how it goes!
Thanks,
Bifocals
(I'm not that quick, there is thread about three doors down, so I just what and pasted what I previously wrote!)
No data will be lost when doing the following: pull the battery while the device is ON.
Replace after a minute, Let the device reboot 1-3 min, see if the problem is fixed.
Click Accept as Solution for posts that have solved your issue(s)!
Be sure to click Like! for those who have helped you.
Install BlackBerry Protect it's a free application designed to help find your lost BlackBerry smartphone, and keep the information on it secure.

WIP Report in CO does not reconcile with FI

Hi All,
I currently facing an issue related to reconciling WIP in FI and CO.
There seems to be a single production order that is not reflected in FI. It is not the same production order but rather a new one every month. It is very easy to isolate but tedious. I can not seem to understand why a single order would be transferred consistently.
Any professional advise would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks in advance

Thank you all for your valuable input.
Let me try providing more pointed information, this may allow for better assessment
In Period 2 user noticed a difference between the amount in KKAO - Calculating WIP and FS10N - GL Display
The difference in period 2 was 1804.44
The difference in then period 3 increased to 2526.51
After further analysis I discovered that the discrepancy stemmed from two orders. In period 2 order 400XXX for the amount of 1804.44 was not transferred to FI. However, that order was reversed - due to completion - in period 3.
In period 3 order 400XXXY for the amount of 2526.51 was not transferred to FI but was reversed - due to completion - in period 4.
I have reviewed the production order and the config multiple times but can not identify a concrete reason for this exception. If this persists what steps should i take. Just and FYI - the program is kicked off at night and results are reviewed in the morning. Settlement process has already been completed through automation.
Once again, i thank you for your input.
Edited by: Aziz Khan on May 12, 2011 7:35 PM

Reconcile with email Notification

Hi,
I am trying to send an email notification when reconciliation between IDM and resource is taking place. I am using the notification.redirect parameter defined in the waveset.properties file to capture the email contents in a flat file eg. c:/email.txt.
In the Edit Reconcile Policy, i am using post reconciliation workflow as "Notify Reconcile Finish"
I am modifying the waveset.properties file as notification.redirect = c:/email.txt
After reconciliation, no such file is created.
Note: I am not changing anything else ...
Can anybody help me out
Thanks in advance

did you receive a reply on that point ?
I wonder if the notification connector can be customized and used for reconciliation

Reconciled with Target systems

when recon with the target system all fields are not updated in the xellerate.how to fix this issue.

It sounds like you are talking about trusted reconciliation. If so, the fields from your target system are listed on the Xellerate User resource object on the reconciliation tab, and the mapping from there to the process form (OIM User Definition) is defined on the process definition of the Xellerate User on the reconciliation mappings tab.
-Kevin

Bill Not Reconciling With Amount Due

Hello, I'd like to have conducted this privately but don't see a way to contact Verizon Support by email or DM, and chat either doesn't work on the weekends or isn't available for billing. I'd appreciate a private contact by email or DM from a Verizon Support representative. My issue is: After moving to a new home and transfering my Verizon Internet service, my bill is higher than I'd expect, given my plan(s). If that's a one time service fee, I understand, though I'd like to see it listed out before I pay it. However, my bill lists my total as '$0' and gives no details, saying that my account is disconnected. As I'm online right now, I can say it hasn't. All my previous bills are showing up as $0 as well, and they appear empty when I look at the pdfs, though I can see my payment history. The personalized bill video also doesn't play. How do I see my actual full bill with the $70.43 due prior to the auto-pay going through on 8/9/15? Please see screenshots below for more details.

Hi schere,
Please contact Verizon Support directly through Contact Us for questions regarding your bill For billing issues please contact them during normal business hours.

Data is not getting reconciled with the R/3 Source

Hi Gurus,
I am trying to extract data from R/3, and i did extracted data from R/3 to PSA (no target is created yet),
the records in R/3 are arround 1003 (2lis_11_vaitm) and after extraction the data records in PSA are around 5000+ , and i don't have any transformations in between , its a just replica of data from R/3 to PSA, can any body clear out this issue pls.
Surabhi

Hi Surabhi,
Check RSA3 and Increase the packet size to maimum number.
Also Check PSA if there is any existing data before loading to PSA.
Is it Full load ? if yes (you are in DEV or Quality then try to delete the data in setup tables and fill setup tables again)
Regards,
Siv

Available Stock status (MM) - which table should I take and what are the fields ??

Kindly Suggest Me !!!
Report that outputs stock, grouped by Material type and Plant. The output shows Material no, Storage location, unit of measure and description in addition to group table using ALV.
Thanks in adv.
Bunty ( New to SAP )

Hello Bunty
When you run the report put in current month in date fields, then when you are in the report you can add the different fields you need.
At the top there is a button called 'Switch Drilldown', this enables you to view by Material Type etc. Fourth from the right is another button that looks like the standard variant button, here you can add or remove different figures for valuing the stock.
Don't forget that this report views periods so you can use average stock etc by changing the month. Also make sure that any stock reports you are using reconcile with each other.
Michael

KF's Unrestricted stock quantity and value coming wrong

Dear All, 
 
I have this serious issue that in the stock overview report the KF's unrestricted stock value and quantity are not coming correct. 
Receipt issue quantity are correct. 
 
Where in i checked the data in the cube for that particular month in production and development and they are same. 
 
I reconciled with r3 too. 
 
I am not able to crack this issue and as far as i know i guess these figures are calculated at runtime but how and why they are wrong i am clueless. 
The same are coming right in development system. 
 
Also i have compressed the BF and UM initialization without marker update. 
 
Also the deltas without marker update. 
 
Is this an issue?? 
 
Any help pls !!! 
 
Regards, 
 
Suyash

Hi AJ,
I know that but is that just a performance issue as data is same in the cube?
Pls let me know if you have more inputs on this.
I still have doubts on this
regards,
Suyash

Difference between stock as per FI & MM

Hi,
I am reconciling stock record as per FI ( Balance Sheet) & MM.
few difference are coming in some business area.
Can anyone clarify me the possible causes of this difference.
regards
Saurabh Bagri

Hi, from my experience there are certain things we have to aware:
For all valuation areas in which currency is being converted to the leading currency, the stock values of the materials must also be converted.
Remember that small differences may occur because amounts are rounded to the the nearest cent.If this cause inconsistencies (for example, the stock value is not equal to the quantity x the price), a reconciliation is required after currency conversion.
If necessary, differences that occur are taken into account during the conversion procedure and corrected automatically.
And also, the LIFO/FIFO receipt data is not reconciled with the material documents and accounting documents that have been converted. If required, you can recompile the LIFO/FIFO receipt data using a document extract after the conversion. To do so, you must not have archived any material documents or settlements for production orders.
hope it helps and don't forget to assign points
regards,
Lily

Reconcile Accounts Based COPA with FI

Dear Experts,
My client needs material wise, customer wise, Sales Area-wise, region wise etc profitability report. The only way to achieve this is through COPA.I have confusion whether to go for Costing based COPA (CBC) or Accounts based COPA (ABC).
I am afraid of CBC because reports from CBC do not automatically reconcile with FI and I will have a life long task of explaining the difference to management. I have seen clients scarpping CBC because at the end CBC works on calculated values which cannot inherently tally with FI and soon management stops trusting CBC. Moreover Gross Profit level figures for each characteristics can be obtained straight from LIS instead of going for CBC.
I am sure that ABC will reconcile with FI. I presume that this will happen ONLY if field status group of all cost and revenue accounts have been configured to mandate posting to PSG. Else even ABC will not reconicle with FI. My question is If I mandate PSG for all cost/revenue posting then I fear that automatic postings coming from MM/HR will go into error. How do we handle this and achieve ABC = FI.
If anyone has come across ABC to FI reconcilation error/issues I would like take their guidance before I move forward.
Regards
Deepak Saxena

Hi..!
You can use either activate Costing Based CO PA nor Accounting Based CO PA.
1.Costing based CO-PA - it will be difficult to reconcile FI with CO PA as lot of time it will take to reconcile.
For this you need to do assessment - settlements and direct postings from FI-MM-SD to CO PA thru PA transfer structure.
You can find the Differences of FI -CO PA in KEAT t-code and based on the you can understand why it is showing difference (If any). This T-code will help you to reconcile.
2.Accounting Based CO-PA it is easy to reconcile and here the reconciliation happens between GL Account and Cost element level. So you wont get many issues while reconciling.
In Costing based CO-PA you can draw a report at COGS Level where as you wont get it in Account Based CO-PA.
Thanks,
Anil

IM stocks reconcilation with WM stocks

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for