IMac 2.33 vs. Mac Pro 2.66

I know this might seem like a no brainer but here goes. I am looking to set up a second rig and want it to be cost efficient. The iMac 2.33 is about $3300 with three gigs of RAM, the upgraded graphics card and a 500 GB hard drive. And it comes with that great big monitor.
The Mac Pro 2.66 with 2 GB of RAM, the standard graphics (same speed as iMac upgrade) and a 500 GB harddrive is about $3,000. but once i throw in the 23" monitor it goes to 4 grand.
Does anyone have any oppinions on this? Should I try configuring the MacPro 2.0? That would save me $300. Is there a performacne boost using ECC memory? Is a MacPro 2.0 with 4 GB memory better for Logic than a 2.66 with 2 GB?
these questions are a bit beyond me.

stephen, I think the thing with upgrading the graphics card is, it would give better performance for people working with FCP or intensive photo work where there are very large amounts of video data needing to be shunted around, such as multiple video streams. I realise you always work with video, but when we logic users say we work with video, it just means playing back one quicktime video at a time, it's not what video or photo people mean when they say it.. so you really should be fine. just remember to always encode your video to quicktime DV which doesn't require any software decoding and you'll be fine. that said, it's only a matter of a hundred bucks or so to upgrade that card, so it can't hurt to get it if you're at all concerned.
and yes, the MBP you refered to is the very same that I'm finding quite a bit more powerful than my G5. bear in mind that my G5 is not a quad, just a dual core 2gig. however, at an apple demo session I went to, a MBP did compare pretty favourably against a quad G5 anyway. I don't think you'd find it much of a problem to work with, it certainly would be no different to the imac you're looking at.
as for RAM, how much do you have in your G5? as you do orchestral stuff, you should absolutely bump the RAM on the MBP or the imac to the max 3GB. I've only got 2 because I couldn't justify the expense of getting 3 when I bought my machine, and I figured I'd see how it went anyway. so far so good. but I haven't done any projects where I've loaded in track after track of vienna yet. just a few things with some ivory piano, a few tracks of vienna strings and harp, and it handled it all fine. when I've done stuff using a lot of samples on the G5 I always found that around 4GB was the sweet spot.. things seemed to work as well as they would get, even after I tried sticking in a couple of extra gig that I borrowed to try it out. so 3GB it's not too far off that, and given that these machines are really alarmingly powerful anyway, they seem to be able to grunt their way through it regardless.. my MBP still surprises me with its paltry 2GB..
I can understand how after years of having a powerbook 17" you could be turned off the idea of getting another portable. it's hard to imagine holding something in your hands that looks and feels similar to the very underwhelming machine you have now, and to imagine that it could actually give your G5 a run for its money.. it's weird but it's true. my powerbook can only manage a handful of audio tracks, one or two exs, maybe another light synth or two, some EQ and if you ask it very nicely, maybe a single space designer, if it's a small setting. or, get rid of all of that and run one instance of sculpture instead, before it chokes. this is a 1.33gig PB G4 12" btw.. I'm writing on it right now, and I love it as my little email machine, but any serious logic work is quite far out of its reach. if your PB is the fastest one they ever made at 1.67Ghz (I think), well it's not much more of a performer than my little guy.. but when I move over to my little PBs big brother, I can't tell you what a different ballgame it is. everything about it feels like a serious desktop machine while running logic. check my recent posts to see the kind of songs I could work on with it in terms of plug ins and so on. I've yet to have to freeze anything...
so back to your shopping.. you mentioned the joy of having the 2 monitor logic experience. well, getting a 17" MBP to replace your powerbook and then connecting a 2nd monitor will give you that experience, as well as plenty of performance, as well letting you keep the concept of a portable writing machine. it will feel like having your G5 on your lap, you will be freaked out I can tell you that much right now..
and when you're set up in your studio, just use a wireless keyboard and mouse, and put the MBP up on a stand like an icurve or something (which I use) and it can just sit there being your second screen, next to the 23" cinema display or whatever you get, and also secretly be the hidden computer that is running the show. people will wonder where the giant computer tower is... surely you can't be running that huge arrangement in logic and that video playback from a laptop???
or, you can also go for the 24" imac. same performance as far as I can tell as long as you upgrade to the 2.33 chip, and oh boy does that screen look nice. I presume you can still add a second screen to that machine and use it for your video playback, so the imac screen could be a giant playground for logic. not a bad setup up at all.
as for interoperability of your logic sessions. AFAIK, as long as you are on the same version of logic, ie 7.2x on the G5 and on the intel mac, you can open songs on either machine no problemo. to be honest I haven't been able to try it because I've been away from my G5 setup, on the other side of the planet for a few months now, due to sad family reasons.. hence my need to get a MBP portable setup in the first place. anyway from what I've read as long as you're on the same version of logic, things should inter-open just fine.
anyway hope this helps. I think my best advice to you would be to find yourself an apple dealer that is going to grant you the time to come in and test out a couple of systems. it's not impossible to find an apple store that will either already have logic pro installed on machines or will do it for you. bring in an external drive with some of your work projects, your logic key, and go ahead and run them on a 24" imac and on a 17" MBP. make sure your hard drive has your exs sound library on it, and also remember that 3rd party plug ins won't be available. but if you've got projects that run mostly using built in logic stuff and that have some video files, you can see what you're getting yourself into. as you are in the states, there'd have to be an apple store with a pro audio genius somewhere, they'd be crazy to not have one in LA! you could give them a call, talk to the 'genius' and explain you're a working film composer and you absolutely need to be able to test your own projects on the systems before you buy. another possibility but a little more fiddly is to make a clone of your system drive on to a big external FW drive. then also add your sound library and some projects to this drive. you could then try booting from this drive on the imac and MBP in store, and if it works, you'd have your own logic setup and all of your plug ins right there with you.. don't forget iloks of course, if you need them. but I'd check with a 'genius' first.. it's possible that an intel mac won't boot into a cloned system from a G5.
either way, by trying out your own projects you'll be able to see if the machines are going to do what you need them to do. but if you can't swing it to go test drive, my feeling would be that they are both going to be able to give you what you want anyway, particularly if you've been suffering trying to run logic on your PB for so long..
happy shopping, let us know what you end up doing.
oh and one last thing.. you haven't mentioned what your i/o needs are. I doubt you are going to say that you need 24 channels of i/o with super low latency, but if you do.. remember that the imac and MBP limit you to firewire both for audio interfaces and external hard drives. in most cases this is absolutely no problem whatsover. but some users might be tempted to go for a mac pro desktop because of the fact that you can add lots of fast internal storage for projects and sound library, and the PCI or firewire for audio interfaces, thus spreading the load. this probably doesn't apply to what you want to do.. and also, if you are wanting to work between 2 systems, you probably want your project drives to be fast external firewire anyway.
ok any more questions, fire away.
all the best,
antonio

Similar Messages

  • Wich mac is better for running Motion ?  iMac 27" retina or Mac Pro 8 core ?

    wich mac is better for running Motion ?  iMac 27" retina or Mac Pro 8 core ?

    I'm not sure if you've returned the monitor but I had the same problem with my new Mac Pro.
    Basically the Dell monitor doesn't identify itself properly via Mini Display Port/Thunderbolt and newer Macs think it's a TV so the wrong kind of signal is sent to the monitor.
    It's easily fixed - don't be put off by the instructions below, I've just done it and it takes less than a minute.
    Here's what you do:
    Download the Ruby script (click 'patch-edid.rb' in yellow):
    http://embdev.net/topic/284710#3027030
    Move the downloaded 'patch-edid.rb' file to your desktop
    Open the Terminal app from: /Applications/Utilities/Terminal
    In Terminal, type the following and hitting enter  (or copy and paste it into Terminal and hit enter):
    ruby ~/Desktop/patch-edid.rb
    Go to your desktop
    Check that a new folder was created - something like: "DisplayVendorID-10ac"
    Open the Display Overrides folder at:
    /Macintosh HD/System/Library/Displays/Overrides/
    Copy the new folder into the /Overrides directory
    Authenticate with your user password (if asked)
    Restart your mac
    For the first few seconds after restart it might look like nothing has changed but by the time you see the login screen (or your Desktop) everything will look as it should.
    That's it - you won't have to do this again unless you erase and reinstall your mac.
    Hope that helps someone.
    Cheers
    Ben

  • Using 27in iMac as display for Mac Pro (both latest models)

    I'm in need of using my new 27in iMac (current 2012 model) as the display for my current 2012 Mac Pro. As you probably know, the mac pro has 1 DVI port, 2 mini display port, and some firewire ports. The iMac has 1 firewire port and 2 thunderbolt ports. Both units have USB 2.0 obviously. I found that the new iMac doesn't support target disk mode with non-thunderbolt machines so that won't work. I wonder if there is a way to use these other connections to enable my mac pro to display on the imac. Any suggestions?
    (My latest wonder is if I can upgrade the video card in the mac pro with a card that has thunderbolt outputs?) 

    That is a subtle distinction, but I think you are right.
    Use an iMac with Thunderbolt as a display
    If you have an iMac with Thunderbolt, any other Mac with Thunderbolt can use it as a display. The iMac will play both the video and audio from the other Mac.
    Connect the Thunderbolt cable to the Thunderbolt ports on each computer.
    Make sure both Mac computers are turned on and awake.
    Press Command (⌘)-F2 on the keyboard of the external display Mac.
    If you want the external display Mac to play audio as well as video from the primary Mac, choose Apple menu > System Preferences, click Sound, and then click Output. Select the external display Mac from the list of devices.

  • 24" iMac... Mac Pro with Viewsonic Monitor or Apple Display.

    I'm tossing between the options of getting just a 24" iMac... or getting a Mac Pro and getting an Apple Monitor or Getting a Viewsonic Monitor... Are the Apple displays really worth their price? If ONLY talking displays not specs would I really enjoy the 24" iMac due to it being 24" but at the same time (quick mention of specs) it's not upgradable as much as a Mac Pro... is spending $1,000 on a 23" Apple display worth it? I want at least a 22" display. I can get a Viewsonic 22" for less then $400. What is so great about the Apple 23" display that I would want to buy that instead and spend the extra money?

    figured out what I wanted

  • Can I use an iMac to control a mac pro

    I have a 2008 Mac pro that's working well. Since I'm doing a lot a video creation that needs to go to DVD I'm not ready to give it up. but I see the need for a more modern machine for some of the newer software I would like to use. so here is the question.
    Can I use a new iMac as my primary machine, and send the video files to the mac pro for rendering, compression, and storage?
    also can I boot up an older OS (snow leopard) from a disk on the mac pro?
    thanks

    You can use file share
    iOS: About File Sharing
    You can use remote desktop to control hte Pro by another computer
    OS X Mavericks: Allow access using Apple Remote Desktop
    http://www.apple.com/remotedesktop/

  • New iMacs better than my Mac Pro?

    So would the new 27-inch iMac top of the line out in Dec 2012, be a better/faster station than my MAC PRO 3.0 early 2008 with 3TB storage, 12GB RAM and a ATI 5870 card?
    I'd be editing both CS6 and Final Cut Studio 3 on it.

    In case Allan was unclear:  Absolutely not. 
    I have a early 2008 MacPro 8x 3.2GHz (16GB RAM / 8TB Storage I've upgraded to SATA3 and have dual 27" Samsung monitors and a 37" color grading monitor on an Matrox MSO2 mini. I wouldn't trade it for a pile of new iMacs.

  • Imac hard drive in Mac Pro??

    My boss has an Imac drive that had problems, and got pulled out of his Imac.
    He wants me to try and recover the data.
    Can this drive go in my Mac Pro?
    I installed it, but when i tried to boot up, it sounded like a wind tunnel, never booted.
    any advice??
    Thanks!!

    For such situations, always better to slap drive into a USB/FW type case and boot the computer and only then try to mount the drive.
    The systems are different, your Mac runs 10.4.10 even now?
    There is a nice thread or two over on OS X on recovery software and tips.
    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2611678

  • IMac vs the new Mac Pro for video editing in FCPX?

    Hi.
    I am currently using a macbook air for all my editing and rendering of videos in FCPX. The editing process is reasonably smooth when dealing with shorter clips, but when I tried to edit multicam clips, things started to slow down. Also,  the rendering and compression processes are tedious. I am planning to edit and process a much larger number of videos in the next years to come, so I have decided to do a serious upgrade of my system.
    For the moment, I am torn between a maxed out iMac 27", which would be the cheapest alternative, and the 6 core Mac Pro or 4 core Mac Pro.
    When I look at benchmarks of the new Mac Pro's in Geekbench, the iMac is never very far away in terms of performance.  Does tests like this tell anything about how well the Mac Pro will perform in FCP?   Does the hardware in the Mac Pro have features which makes it superior to the iMac, in other ways than for example the "pure power" of the CPU and GPU?
    Christopher.

    FCP X 10.1, Motion 5.1 Updates w/Dual GPU Support (new Mac Pros) (from Thursday)
    Apple released Final Cut Pro X 10.1 Thursday with support for Dual GPUs in the new Mac Pro and more.
    Long list in the Final Cut Pro X 10.1 Release Notes that also links to info on How to back up important FCP X 10.0.x files before updating. (Today's Apple docs listing also has more related to Final Cut Pro X 10.1.)
    Also out today are Compressor 4.1 and Motion 5.1. Full release notes below but here's a clip from the App store Motion 5.1 changes:
    Optimized playback and rendering using dual GPUs in the new Mac Pro
    FxPlug 3 with custom plug-in interfaces and dual-GPU support
    Faster project loading, especially for complex projects
    Share directly to YouTube at 4K resolution
    Spanish language localization
    Dual FirePro Dxxx Rendering FCP-X
    http://www.barefeats.com/tube05.html
    Intel Xeon processors are designed to run 24/7 and stay cool and under load.
    Mac Pro so far hold up strongly for years, easy to add and upgrade RAM and processor, and maybe, hopefully, even the twin GPUs. Thunderbolt2 for all your projects and storage as well.
    6 or 8-cores is going to walk away from iMac which is breathing hard and not designed for constant heat. Haswell was designed to conserve and reduce.

  • Can I put my iMac HD into my Mac Pro?

    I recently purchased a new 1 TB drive for my Late 2006 iMac, installed lion and transferred all my data from an older computer.  I just recently was given a Mac Pro Early 2009 unit with only 640 GB in there.  I'd like to use my new 1TB as it is compatible with the Mac Pro, and I was wondering if I could remove the 1 TB drive from the iMac and merely install into the Mac Pro as the primary drive with the OS?  The goal being to not have to reinstall everything on a new drive in the Mac Pro, and then run a migration of over 400 GB.  Would this work, what are my risks? 
    If this would work, I'd just wipe the 640 GB and put in the second slot and use for additional storage or backup. 

    All SATA 3.5 in form-factor drives are compatible, and SATA 2.5 in drives can be used with an adapter for proper mounting.
    The Mac Pro, with its multiple drive bays, can get a big performance boost by establishing a "Boot Drive". This is a drive with only System, Library, Applications, and the hidden unix files for paging/swap. User files are moved off to a data-only drive or drives, and only the Admin account used for actual administration (not daily use) is left on the boot drive for emergencies. You may want to think about transitioning to a Boot Drive setup in the future.

  • Mac Pro or iMac? Benefit of Mac Pro not clear

    I have an older G5 PowerPC tower, which I bought back when the performance difference between it and an iMac was significant. But as I ponder replacing it, I am having a hard time seeing the benefits vs. cost of the Mac Pro tower. Other than expandability, is the Quad-Core processor that much better than the iMac's Core 2 duo? Assuming that expandability is not important to me, why should I consider the Mac Pro over the iMac? Here are two examples from a current MacMall catalog:
    • 27-inch iMac, 3.06 GHz Core 2 duo processor, 4 GB RAM, 1 TB hard drive, $1,694
    • Mac Pro, 2.66 GHz Quad-Core processor, 3 GB RAM, 1 TB hard drive, $2,594
    Why should I consider spending $900 more for the Mac Pro, especially when it has less RAM and an apparently slower processor?

    Terry,
    Just to add to this, I just recently got a 2.66 single-quad core nehalem 2009 mac pro.. and just a few days ago I received my core i7-975 desktop processor and was able to remove the xeon w3520 or 2.66 and replace the ecc memory with non-ecc memory and everything works great. So, you do have options.. you are not bound to use xeon processors or ecc memory, as for my purposes the desktop core i7-975 which the xeon equi is w3580 - this is the same processor Apple charges royally for at the apple store.. I bought both processor and memory for like 500 dollars - saving a lot of money..
    The Hatter, a pc builder will tell you that the 2009 quad-core singles use standard OEM INTEL processors with integrated heatsinks.. while the duals are lidless and don't use oem.
    This is good news if one is trying to save a lot of money on a processor upgrade..

  • No Sound from Flip video clips on iMac, but works on Mac Pro and Macbook

    I just got a flip video camera today. I tried it out at work, made a quick video, imported it on my mac pro, and it worked fine. I came home took some videos, went on my iMac(24 inch core 2 duo) and was surpised that the videos imported without sound. After searching the web, I didn't find any concrete solutions, just some suggestions that pointed towards codecs. Since nothing worked, I sent the file to my wife's macbook pro to try it out. The same AVI file on her computer plays sound. Now I am totally confused.
    Any ideas?

    The sound is on, and other files and applications play sound.
    In fact, in iMovie 09, there is sound. But there is no sound in quicktime, VLC player, the flipshare software the camera works with, and if I upload to youtube via the iMac there is no sound on the youtube video, but if I upload the file to youtube from the macbook pro, there is sound.
    I don't know what to try next.

  • Are new iMacs adequate or is Mac Pro needed

    I'm about to upgrade. are new iMacs adequate for 1st home studio and running apps like Logic or do i need to invest in a Mac Pro?

    i think you'll find the new iMacs more than capable of running a home studio. buy the mac pro if you need room for expansion, or if you just don't like the idea of an all-in-one. otherwise, save some serious dough and go for the iMac. i think you'll be quite thrilled honestly.
    my CoreDuo 2ghz almost matches my old Power Mac Dual G5 using Logic - i say almost because i recently got a Core Audio Overload message on the iMac trying to play a big session i created on the G5 (where i never got such a message). but as i said before, i think the new Core2Duo chips will erase any doubt re: intel imac vs. power mac g5 (dual)

  • Synching calendar on iMac, iPhone, iPad, and mac pro

    i'm a newbie, is there a way i can synch my calendar on all my 4 system? thanks.

    Yes, it is called iCloud.  If your iMac has Lion, Mac OS X 10.7.2 or later, you can use iCloud on the iMac and the idevices if they have iOS 5 or later.  Just click on the iCloud icon on your iMac, System Preferences, on the left side and under Internet and Networks and setup your free iCloud account.

  • Using IMAC 27 (LATE 2009 ) as primary display for MAC PRO PRO 2013

    I have been a user of IMAC & Macbook but not mac PRO.
    I wish to upgrade to  MAC PRO ( 2013 ). As i want to make the transition less costly i want to use my current IMAC 27in ( LATE 2009 ) as the one and only display.
    First question . Is the above possible with MAC PRO ?
    Second question related - When using the above option eg  MAC PRO as main system and 27in IMAC as display. Will the hard drive and on the IMAC be possible to go in to sleep mode. I would be concious about power consumption and the life expentancy of the constant use of the HARD DRIVE on the IMAC.
    I would like to be able to keep the hard drive on the IMAC off or at least in sleep mode.

    Target Display Mode FAQ:
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3924?viewlocale=en_US

  • Should I buy a new Mac Pro or an iMac?

    Hi,
    I co-run a video production company in the UK. We have an old 2009 iMac, a MacBook Pro from 2010/11 ish, and a PC all used for video editing, and some other intensive apps like Photoshop and Adobe After Effects.
    We're about to spend some money on either a fully specced 2013 iMac or a new Mac Pro. The mac Pro we'd be able to afford would be £1500 more than the iMac (which includes purchasing an external display, mouse and keyboard - all of which an iMac obviously already includes so the price comparison is valid).
    The Mac Pro would be a 3.7 quad-core processor, 256ssd, 12gig ram - which I would then upgrade to 64gig (somewhere else for financial reasons) and finally Dual AMD GPUs with 3gig of ram each. That's all we can afford unfortunately!
    The iMac would be a 3.5 quad core, 1TB fusion drive, and 8gig of ram that I would then max out externally to 32gig, and finally NVidia Geforce 4gig GPU.
    Either one we buy we'd get Applecare.
    Any suggestions as to which would be better to purchase? Our difficulty comes with the fact that we don't have an awful lot of cash to spare, and we also have other things we'd like to invest in (building improvements etc). The guys who work at the company are naturally leaning towards the Mac Pro, as was I intially, but my job is also to spend our money as wisely as possible, so I'd like some advice on whether the Mac Pro is worth spending that extra £1500 on.
    Obviously I understand the Mac Pro will be faster generally speaking, but will it really make a big difference when using Adobe Premiere Pro and After Effects and Photoshop? Or is a fully specced iMac going to be just as good?
    Also what other advantages, other than just speed, would a Mac Pro bring?
    Cheers in advance,
    Phil

    One question to ask yourself is how long you need this machine to do these tasks and what future programs/tasks will you need?
    While both machines can handle everything you mentioned now, the MAc Pro will be faster now, and easier to expand in the future.  The iMac will simply not be as cost effective long term.  If however your needs wont change or you don't plan to use the machine more than 3-4 years, the iMac is going to get the job done and of course be much cheaper.

  • New iMac 24" or Mac Pro for Aperure

    Hi All,
    I only can get stock computers in COMPUSA or authorized resellers in PR.
    Which one do you recommend for Aperture, the new iMac 24" or the Mac Pro? It looks they both use the same video card...

    Sadly I have just asked Apple to take back my mac book pro 17" 2.16 because aperture was just to slow and it became annoying, after any adjustments to a photo the loupe tool would jump and jerk across the screen or the patch tool would do the same after around 3-4 patched dust marks, I came across to a mac purely for aperture, which incidently I think aperture is a great tool, if it would only run faster. If the MBP 17" 100gb 7200rpm HD 2 gb Ram and Radion X1600 with 256 mb memory has problems running this software what hardware setup was this programme actually built for.
    I will have to stay with my steam driven dell pc until I can make my mind up what to do, I must admit I am impressed by the mac itself and I found the service from apple outstanding, this laptop is my second machine in 3 weeks, first one had a warped top apple took it back and sent another one immediately, having also explained my problem and dissatisfaction with the second they have taken it back with full refund without any hassle whatsoever.
    Dave Hall

Maybe you are looking for

  • Cannot write the suitable source codes for running program

    I want to write a program that help student to compile program and run program by using some test cases. For the compiled part, i have been wrote it successfully, but for the run part, i cannot pass the test cases to the program for running. Could an

  • Essbase Security filter in OBIEE 11.1.1.6 request

    Hello Experts I have got a requirement whereby I need to apply Data Level Securityfor the Essbase sourced cube in OBIEE11g. But the issue is the dimension value where I need to apply security filter has 25K distinct values and is Unbalanced Hierarchy

  • Please reset license for Adobe Indesign Server CC

    Hi, Can you reset this license because it have error "Adobe Genuine Software Vertification Failure"? Previously, I installed AIS CC on this server that it can install, but I have some other problem so I full installed server again found that AIS CC c

  • OVD - exclude users without uid attribute

    Hello, i'm mapping an LDAP using OVD. Users and Groups are OK. Now i need to exclude users without the attribute uid ... how can i do it? I try to do it using the "DN Matching" of the adapter, but as soon as i start to put some expression related wit

  • How long will the shuffle stay on repeat?

    I want to use a Shuffle as an on-hold device...how long will it continue to repeat?