Image looks truncated in viewer and canevas
Hi there,
I am begining a new SD project in which I imported a QT sequence that was generated with Mpegstreamclip.
I chose easy settings mode in FCP.
In both viwere and canevas, the image does not look "centered".
As a matter of fact, it is truncated on the right side and when I play the sequence, a vertically moving blueish-greenwish band appears on the right side.
I have checked that the sequence plays all right in MPEG streamclip.
By the way, if I import another sequence that was shot with a HD photocamera, 16:9 format, a blueish band also appears on the right side.
What could be the problem ?
It is the first time I see that
Thanks in advance
Ivan
The image on the left in PS looks the same in Picasa Image
Viewer (I selected it to be color managed based on the monitor profile), looks the same in Windows Image Viewer, and looks the same in the thumbnail. The image on the right in LR is how the picture looks when I look at my image in Firefox but in Internet Explorer and in Chrome, the image looks like the image on the left in PS. The image below shows how the thumbnail looks different from the actual picture when it's double clicked and viewed in Picasa. The thumbnail (which shows the subjects having green skin) would be how I saw it online while the double clicked version is how I saw it in PS, even though it was sRGB (I checked the image properties to make sure of the color space).
I have a ATI 5470 GPU on my ASUS 17.3 inch laptop. Not sure about the drivers.
Similar Messages
-
Images look great in viewer and terrible in canvas
I made some map animations in Motion and Keynote. They plook perfect in the Viewer window but terrible in the Canvas window. I have a 480i DV/NTSC timeline. As far as I know, all my settings are correct.
The problem is that colors look blocky in the canvas window. Is there any way to get the Canvas window to display images as cleanly as they are displayed in the Viewer window of FCP7?
Is there anything I should do to these images in Photoshop to prep them for FCP?
Thanks very much in advance,
- Nick
Message was edited by: Nicholas Natteau1The Viewer just shows whatever you have in its native state.
Moving the clip or image to the Canvas forces it to display at the resolution and color space of the codec used in the Sequence setting.
FCP works best with still images that were saved in the TIFF format. PNG will also give good results. You should always use images with a RGB color space.
The problem is that colors look blocky in the canvas window.
The images very likely need to be rendered, then they will look much better.
Consider also that the Canvas always shows a low res proxy. This is less demanding on system resources for real time playback. To see what you really have requires connecting a calibrated, broadcast monitor or at the very least, an excellent TV.
Is there anything I should do to these images in Photoshop to prep them for FCP?
Unless you need to zoom and pan the images, open one of Photoshop's Film & Video presets that matches the pixel dimensions of your FCP timeline settings. Paste your images into the preset template and use the transform tools to scale them to the right size. -
Images not showing in viewer and browser
I've been using Apreture 2.1.1 without any problems until yesterday. Even though all my projects are in tact, I can no longer see the images in the Aperture viewer and browser. I really don't know how this happened. To rectify the problem I did the following:
1. Verified and repaired the Disk using Disk Utility
2. Logged in in Safe mode and did the above
3. Uninstalled Aperture, removed all reference files and re-installed
4. Opened the Library and photos are all intact.
5. Uninstalled Aperture and re-installed the 2.0 version
I did all the above but still have the same issue. Just can't figure out what is wrong here.
Any suggestions would be highly appreciated.
thanks
ps. Forgot to add this: It also crashes when I want to quit it
Message was edited by: AlexGoAlexGo wrote:
I've been using Apreture 2.1.1 without any problems until yesterday. Even though all my projects are in tact, I can no longer see the images in the Aperture viewer and browser. I really don't know how this happened. To rectify the problem I did the following:
1. Verified and repaired the Disk using Disk Utility
2. Logged in in Safe mode and did the above
3. Uninstalled Aperture, removed all reference files and re-installed
4. Opened the Library and photos are all intact.
5. Uninstalled Aperture and re-installed the 2.0 version
I did all the above but still have the same issue. Just can't figure out what is wrong here.
Any suggestions would be highly appreciated.
thanks
ps. Forgot to add this: It also crashes when I want to quit it
Message was edited by: AlexGo
did you dump the preferences and appropriate other files? prior to the reinstall? otherwise if any of those files are bad you'll be installing aperture with the same possibly corrupt files.
your problem sounds like a hard drive or cable issue, have you swapped out cables?
what cable are you using? eSATA? FW800? -
Why are some jpg images scrambled when they appear in my screen saver? The same images look fine in Preview and Finder. Some images appear scrambled in the screen saver 'preview' window and the actual screen saver. Other jpg images look fine.
The desktop image is fine, taken from the exact same pool of jpg photos. However, as soon as the slide show screen saver comes on, the images are scrambled. What is it about the apple screen saver algorithm that scrambles the pics?
-
Image looks different in Photoshop and Lightroom
I started a forum on flickr and I have some issues with my images. I have calibrated monitor but my images look off online even though I saved them as sRGB. Now my image looks one way in PS and then when I finish editing it and save it, I import it into lightroom and it looks different.
Same image, but it looks different.
http://www.flickr.com/groups/photoshopsupport/discuss/72157626443796391/#comment7215762645 5942911The image on the left in PS looks the same in Picasa Image
Viewer (I selected it to be color managed based on the monitor profile), looks the same in Windows Image Viewer, and looks the same in the thumbnail. The image on the right in LR is how the picture looks when I look at my image in Firefox but in Internet Explorer and in Chrome, the image looks like the image on the left in PS. The image below shows how the thumbnail looks different from the actual picture when it's double clicked and viewed in Picasa. The thumbnail (which shows the subjects having green skin) would be how I saw it online while the double clicked version is how I saw it in PS, even though it was sRGB (I checked the image properties to make sure of the color space).
I have a ATI 5470 GPU on my ASUS 17.3 inch laptop. Not sure about the drivers. -
Missing images in "all projects view" and System Pref- Desktop!
I was about selecting the image pick for my projects in the Aperture's all projects view to find out that some of my picture are missing.
I had verify that the image I was looking for is actually in my project and isn't rejected. I even perform a library rebuilt, but still a few of my pictures aren't showing up in this view. Anyone is also having this issue, know why or how I could fix this?
beside, I also have a similar issue of some pictures not showing up in the System Preferences under Desktop. All my Aperture's project are there, but not all pictures aren't showing up. By the way, the missing pictures there aren't the same as the ones not showing up in the "all projects view".SeaBeast wrote:
I was about selecting the image pick for my projects in the Aperture's all projects view to find out that some of my picture are missing.
I had verify that the image I was looking for is actually in my project and isn't rejected. I even perform a library rebuilt, but still a few of my pictures aren't showing up in this view. Anyone is also having this issue, know why or how I could fix this?
The thumbnail you are scrubbing across with the mouse is only 156 pixels wide on the screen. If you have more than 156 images in the Project it'd be pretty complicated to show every single one. As far as I can see the All Projects view is there to give you a quick overview of the Project content, but isn't designed for 'detailed' browsing.
Find the image you want in it's Project, Right/Control-click and choose 'Make Key Photo'.
beside, I also have a similar issue of some pictures not showing up in the System Preferences under Desktop. All my Aperture's project are there, but not all pictures aren't showing up. By the way, the missing pictures there aren't the same as the ones not showing up in the "all projects view".
Only images that have had Previews generated will show up in other applications. Have you made sure that the Previews are up to date?
Ian -
Dreamweaver Images look fine in view but messed up in BROWSER !!!
Hello Guys
I have been getting this weird messed up images since i started my project.
This is giving me a headache so i thought this is best place to solve my problme.
I'm not pro website designer just newbie.
HELP ME !!!
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<title>Website Discovery Mongolia</title>
<style type="text/css">
#Question {
position: absolute;
width: 189px;
height: 23px;
z-index: 3;
left: 1100px;
top: 30px;
margin: auto;
#Container {
position: relative;
width: 1366px;
height: 2532px;
z-index: 1;
margin: auto;
background-color: #A22239;
#Destinations {
position: absolute;
width: 162px;
height: 23px;
z-index: 2;
left: 35px;
top: 310px;
#AboutDis {
position: absolute;
width: 288px;
height: 24px;
z-index: 2;
top: 310px;
left: 1045px;
#Activities {
position: absolute;
width: 338px;
height: 28px;
z-index: 2;
left: 35px;
top: 640px;
#LateAvail {
position: absolute;
width: 210px;
height: 28px;
z-index: 2;
top: 640px;
left: 1060px;
#LatestNews {
position: absolute;
width: 161px;
height: 28px;
z-index: 2;
left: 35px;
top: 980px;
#DisMongCom {
position: absolute;
width: 403px;
height: 28px;
z-index: 2;
top: 979px;
left: 328px;
padding: 0px;
#PopTrips {
position: absolute;
width: 200px;
height: 28px;
z-index: 2;
top: 980px;
left: 1060px;
padding: 0px;
#Read1 {
position: absolute;
width: 104px;
height: 23px;
z-index: 2;
left: 35px;
top: 734px;
#R1 {
position: absolute;
width: 110px;
height: 25px;
z-index: 2;
left: 35px;
top: 1135px;
#Read2 {
position: absolute;
width: 110px;
height: 1px;
z-index: 3;
left: 35px;
top: 1290px;
#Read3 {
position: absolute;
width: 110px;
height: 25px;
z-index: 2;
top: 1440px;
left: 35px;
#Video {
position: absolute;
width: 95px;
height: 22px;
z-index: 2;
padding-left: 2px;
top: 1135px;
left: 325px;
#Pictures {
position: absolute;
width: 133px;
height: 23px;
z-index: 3;
left: 328px;
top: 1280px;
#Follow {
position: absolute;
width: 136px;
height: 24px;
z-index: 2;
left: 329px;
top: 1440px;
#Copytight {
position: absolute;
width: 200px;
height: 58px;
z-index: 2;
top: 2260px;
left: 410px;
#ViewTripButton1 {
position: absolute;
width: 160px;
height: 40px;
z-index: 2;
top: 1405px;
left: 1170px;
#ViewTrip2 {
position: absolute;
width: 160px;
height: 40px;
z-index: 3;
left: 1170px;
top: 1570px;
#ViewTrip3 {
position: absolute;
width: 160px;
height: 40px;
z-index: 2;
left: 1170px;
top: 1230px;
#BannerPhoto1 {
position: absolute;
width: 1015px;
height: 180px;
z-index: 2;
top: 108px;
left: 15px;
#SpryMenu {
position: absolute;
width: 1100px;
height: 20px;
z-index: 2;
left: -1px;
top: -25px;
</style>
<link href="SpryAssets/SpryMenuBarHorizontal.css" rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" />
<script src="SpryAssets/SpryMenuBar.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#A22239">
<div id="Container">
<div id="BannerPhoto1">
<div id="SpryMenu">
<ul id="MenuBar1" class="MenuBarHorizontal">
<li><a href="Indexpage.html">HOME </a> </li>
<li><a href="#">TOURS</a></li>
<li><a href="#">TRANSPORT</a> </li>
<li><a href="#">ABOUT MONGOLIA</a></li>
<li><a href="#">TRAVEL GUIDE</a></li>
<li><a href="#">CONTACT</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
<!-- Begin DWUser_EasyRotator -->
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://c520866.r66.cf2.rackcdn.com/1/js/easy_rotator.min.js"></script>
<div class="dwuserEasyRotator" style="width: 1015px; height: 180px; position:relative; text-align: left;" data-erconfig="{autoplayEnabled:true, lpp:'102-105-108-101-58-47-47-47-67-58-47-85-115-101-114-115-47-66-105-108-107-97-83-109- 105-108-101-47-77-117-115-105-99-47-68-111-99-117-109-101-110-116-115-47-69-97-115-121-82- 111-116-97-116-111-114-80-114-101-118-105-101-119-47-112-114-101-118-105-101-119-95-115-11 9-102-115-47', wv:1}" data-ername="Roator" data-ertid="{pankqfmdhc4588799372931}">
<div data-ertype="content" style="display: none;">
<ul data-erlabel="Main Category">
<li> <img class="main" src="New Images/BannerSlidePhotos/Photo3.jpg" /> <img class="thumb" src="New Images/BannerSlidePhotos/Photo3.jpg" /> </li>
<li> <img class="main" src="New Images/BannerSlidePhotos/Photo2.jpg" /> <img class="thumb" src="New Images/BannerSlidePhotos/Photo2.jpg" /> </li>
<li> <img class="main" src="New Images/BannerSlidePhotos/Photo1.jpg" /> <img class="thumb" src="New Images/BannerSlidePhotos/Photo1.jpg" /> </li>
</ul>
</div>
<div data-ertype="layout" data-ertemplatename="NONE" style="">
<div class="erimgMain" style="position: absolute; left:0;right:0;top:0;bottom:0;" data-erconfig="{__numTiles:3, scaleMode:'scaleDown', imgType:'main', __loopNextButton:false, __arrowButtonMode:'rollover'}">
<div class="erimgMain_slides" style="position: absolute; left:0; top:0; bottom:0; right:0;">
<div class="erimgMain_slide">
<div class="erimgMain_img" style="position: absolute; left: 0; right: 0; top: 0; bottom: 0;"></div>
</div>
</div>
<div class="erimgMain_arrowLeft" style="position:absolute; left: 10px; top: 50%; margin-top: -15px;" data-erconfig="{image:'circleSmall', image2:'circleSmall'}"></div>
<div class="erimgMain_arrowRight" style="position:absolute; right: 10px; top: 50%; margin-top: -15px;" data-erconfig="{image:'circleSmall', image2:'circleSmall'}"></div>
</div>
<div class="erabout erFixCSS3" style="color: #FFF; text-align: left; background: #000; background:rgba(0,0,0,0.93); border: 2px solid #FFF; padding: 20px; font: normal 11px/14px Verdana,_sans; width: 300px; border-radius: 10px; display:none;"> This <a style="color:#FFF;" href="http://www.dwuser.com/easyrotator/" target="_blank">jQuery slider</a> was created with the free <a style="color:#FFF;" href="http://www.dwuser.com/easyrotator/" target="_blank">EasyRotator</a> software from DWUser.com. <br />
<br />
Use WordPress? The free <a style="color:#FFF;" href="http://www.dwuser.com/easyrotator/wordpress/" target="_blank">EasyRotator for WordPress</a> plugin lets you create beautiful <a style="color:#FFF;" href="http://www.dwuser.com/easyrotator/wordpress/" target="_blank">WordPress sliders</a> in seconds. <br />
<br />
<a style="color:#FFF;" href="#" class="erabout_ok">OK</a> </div>
<noscript>
Rotator powered by <a href="http://www.dwuser.com/easyrotator/">EasyRotator</a>, a free and easy jQuery slider builder from DWUser.com. Please enable JavaScript to view.
</noscript>
<script type="text/javascript">/*Avoid IE gzip bug*/(function(b,c,d){try{if(!b[d]){b[d]="temp";var a=c.createElement("script");a.type="text/javascript";a.src="http://easyrotator.s3.amazonaws.com/1/js/nozip/easy_rotator.min.js";c.getElementsByTagName("head")[0].appendChild(a)}}catch(e){alert("EasyRotator fail; contact support.")}})(window,document,"er_$144");</script>
</div>
<!-- End DWUser_EasyRotator -->
</div>
<img src="New Images/MainBackgroundImages/Top.jpg" width="1030" height="287" /><img src="New Images/MainBackgroundImages/Form.jpg" width="336" height="287" />
<div id="Question"><img src="New Images/Buttons and Text/newdesign_03.jpg" width="189" height="23" /></div>
<img src="New Images/MainBackgroundImages/_03.jpg" width="1019" height="331" />
<div id="Destinations"><a href="Indexpage.html"><img src="New Images/Buttons and Text/newdesign_10.jpg" width="162" height="23" /></a></div><img src="New Images/MainBackgroundImages/About-Discovery-Mongolia.jpg" width="347" height="331" /><div id="AboutDis"><a href="www.wikipedia.com"><img src="New Images/Buttons and Text/newdesign_07.jpg" width="288" height="24" /></a></div><div id="Activities"><a href="www.google.com"><img src="New Images/Buttons and Text/newdesign_14.jpg" width="338" height="28" /></a></div>
<img src="New Images/MainBackgroundImages/Activities-and-Experiences.jpg" width="1019" height="342" /><img src="New Images/MainBackgroundImages/_06.jpg" width="347" height="342" />
<div id="LateAvail"><a href="www.quirky.com"><img src="New Images/Buttons and Text/newdesign_08.jpg" width="210" height="28" /></a></div>
<div id="LatestNews"><a href="www.google.com"><img src="New Images/Buttons and Text/newdesign_17.jpg" width="161" height="28" /></a></div><div id="DisMongCom"><a href="www.yahoo.com"><img src="New Images/Buttons and Text/newdesign_19.jpg" width="403" height="28" /></a></div><div id="PopTrips"><a href="www.exodus.co.uk"><img src="New Images/Buttons and Text/newdesign_21.jpg" width="169" height="28" /></a></div>
<img src="New Images/MainBackgroundImages/Contern2.jpg" width="297" height="669" /><div id="Read3"><a href="Indexpage.html"><img src="New Images/Buttons and Text/newdesign_27.jpg" width="110" height="25" /></a></div><div id="R1"><a href="Indexpage.html"><img src="New Images/Buttons and Text/newdesign_27.jpg" width="110" height="25" /></a></div><div id="Read2"><a href="Indexpage.html"><img src="New Images/Buttons and Text/newdesign_27.jpg" width="110" height="25" /></a></div><img src="New Images/MainBackgroundImages/Content1.jpg" width="722" height="669" /><div id="Follow"><img src="New Images/Buttons and Text/Bullet.jpg" width="30" height="21" /><a href="Indexpage.html"><img src="New Images/Buttons and Text/newdesign_43.jpg" width="103" height="20" /></a></div><div id="Pictures"><img src="New Images/Buttons and Text/Bullet.jpg" width="30" height="21" /><a href="Indexpage.html"><img src="New Images/Buttons and Text/newdesign_36.jpg" width="103" height="19" /></a></div><div id="Video"><img src="New Images/Buttons and Text/Bullet.jpg" width="30" height="21" /><a href="Indexpage.html"><img src="New Images/Buttons and Text/newdesign_30.jpg" width="63" height="22" /></a></div><div id="ViewTrip3"><a href="Indexpage.html"><img src="New Images/Buttons and Text/ViewTrip.jpg" width="160" height="40" /></a></div><div id="ViewTripButton1"><a href="Indexpage.html"><img src="New Images/Buttons and Text/ViewTrip.jpg" width="160" height="40" /></a></div><div id="ViewTrip2"><a href="Indexpage.html"><img src="New Images/Buttons and Text/ViewTrip.jpg" width="160" height="40" /></a></div>
<img src="New Images/MainBackgroundImages/Content3.jpg" width="347" height="669" /><img src="New Images/MainBackgroundImages/Footer.jpg" width="1366" height="398" /><div id="Copytight"><img src="New Images/Buttons and Text/Copyright_03.jpg" width="536" height="58" /></div><img src="New Images/MainBackgroundImages/Copyright-and-Privacy.jpg" width="1366" height="515" /></div>
<script type="text/javascript">
var MenuBar1 = new Spry.Widget.MenuBar("MenuBar1", {imgDown:"SpryAssets/SpryMenuBarDownHover.gif", imgRight:"SpryAssets/SpryMenuBarRightHover.gif"});
</script>
</body>
</html>I'm having trouble with my graphics, too, not your trouble though.
As Murray above says,
absolute positioning is wrong! Don't do that. Browsers keep objects with absolute positioning on the coordinates you set, no matter what monitor size is viewing it and no matter how the rest of the page flows.
I took off absolute positioning and it made an immediate difference - code below. The graphics are now inside their containers.
go here to see what I did: http://mkcolling.com/morionadobe.html
go here to see what you did: http://mkcolling.com/BADmorionadobe.html
Two other things I noticed:
1) Remove the height on your containers, too. Instead, use padding to add blank space around the content inside your containers and use margin to add the outside space that separates the containers.
2)Your spry menu is wider than your outer container. You would fix that on the Spry css. -
ITunes 7.3.2: ArtWork does not match Images on Cover Flow View and iPod
Hello everyone, this is my first post, thanks in advance for any and all help.
I have loaded most of my music collection onto iTunes, and authorized it to get album artwork. It has only found about 60% of my cover art (I have a lot of international discs, etc.), and of what it does find maybe 60% is correct. So I have spent a lot of time adding artwork by either scanning in cover art or cutting and pasting from the web. I go to "Get Info" and check the artwork tab all the time to make sure that only artwork that is correct or that I have added is attached to each of my song files.
However, I have noticed that there is a significant amount of my song files that, when I use cover flow view, or when I play the songs on my video iPod, the artwork that is on the artwork pane and what appears on the cover flow view don't match. Or the artwork that is in the artwork pane (and the only artwork in the get info artwork section) and what shows up on my iPod, don't match up. It is, for an OCD completist like me, rather annoying.
As an example, I have a lot of compilation albums. I have probably 13 different albums by different artists but which all have the same name of "The Ultimate Collection". There are some tracks for each album where the artwork pane and the cover flow view artwork match, but not all of the tracks.
I selected "group compilations when browsing", but that doesn't help. I selected all the tracks from the same album and clicked yes to whether it is a compilation, and that didn't work.
Does anyone have a simple, QUICK solution for making the artwork I have put in the artwork pane override or force itself on the cover flow view? Horrible phrasing I know, but thank you in advance for your help!I had the same problem when I updated to 7.3, but I was able to fix it.
As far as I can tell, itunes 7.3 sees all music files (in your user/itunes/music folder) with the extension .mpg as quicktime movies, not mp3's and itunes won't let you add a cover to them. The problem is that songs imported as mp3's by previous versions of iTunes were all given the extension .mpg and not .mp3 (at least on my machine). I was able to fix the problem by simply changing the .mpg to .mp3 for all of my songs. As soon as I did this, the album artwork showed up again.
You have a few options for how you change the extension. You can right click on every file in your itunes library and select "Show In Finder" to change the file extension, or if you have many songs to fix (I had 793) you can download 'A Better Finder Rename' (search for it at www.versiontracker.com, it costs $20 to change more than 10 files at a time) which will make the changes automatically. If you are cheap you can always set up an automator work-flow to get the job done.
Hope this helps -
As above.
Mac OS X 10.9.5 has a color management bug that can lead to colors appearing different in Develop and Library: Jao's photo blog: Serious color management bug in Mac OS 10.9 "Mavericks" . See also: Jao's photo blog: Further quantification of the Mavericks color management problem and Jao's photo blog: Color management in Safari is broken in Mavericks too. Sorry for all the links to my blog, but this bug really annoys me and it bugs me that it hasn't been fixed all these months that Mavericks has been out. This can lead to color shifts especially in the deep tones. You can sometimes work around it by turning on soft proofing and proofing to adobeRGB or sRGB. Adobe could fix this but they haven't so far. Apple could fix it too, but they haven't until now. They fixed some code that lead to Aperture working correctly but Lightroom still has the problem.
-
My images look blurry when I export or publish my site from Muse. Why and how do I fix it?
My images look blurry, jagged, pixelated and low quality when I publish or export my site from Muse. Is there any way to avoid or fix this problem?
The primary cause of blurring images is the less than Photoshop-quality image downsampling algorithm currently used in Muse (that was compounded in early betas due to a bug in the JPEG compression library we were using at that time). Due to work we've done for Beta 7 to improve image encoding performance we now have the infrastructure in place to enable us to take a much better image resampler/resizer (after Beta 7), so this source of blurring will be addressed.
The other source of blurring is unique to opaque images containing line art or otherwise containing hard edges and large areas of solid color. When an image is opaque Muse will encode it as JPEG (if it's altered in Muse is a way that requires re-encoding). For line art this will introduce JPEG compression artifacts that can be noticeable depending on your eye and the specific image involved.
There are (at least) to ways to avoid these JPEG compression artifacts:
Resize your image before placing and avoid applying any effects (rounded corners, drop shadow, etc.) or doing any cropping or resizing in Muse. If the image is unaltered your original JPEG, PNG or GIF will be passed through unaltered.*
Put at least one pixel of transparency in your original image. (It could be a single 99% opaque pixel.) This will force Muse to encode as PNG. PNG compression is lossless and thus doesn't introduce any compression artifacts. However, an average PNG can be 5 times the size of a JPEG for the same image, so there is an impact to webpage download performance.
*For PSD files Muse has to encode the original PSD data into some web-friendly image format. If an image is resized in Photoshop and placed Muse won't resize/resample the image data, but it will encode it as JPEG or PNG depending on whether it contains transparency. -
Exported images looking different in different browsers
I've just published a set of images to my website using a publishing service from Lightroom 5, sRGB. The images look different when viewed in Chrome and Firefox browsers, Chrome looking fine but Firefox displaying them with a red cast. The also display with the red cast in some parts of the OS X Finder but not in Lightroom or Photoshop.
I've run one of the images through Jeffrey Friedl's online exif viewer and it's telling me there's no colour space metadata or embedded colour profile in the images ( http://goo.gl/Ouqkis). this would make sense as far as the strange colour goes but I thought Lightroom always embedded a colour profile?
I've had a couple of suggestions that revolve around changing firefox settings but really I just need for the images to work in any browser, without visitors having to care.
Does anyone have any thoughts
Sample screen grab, Chrome to the left, Firefox to the right.kimaldis wrote:
Firefox and OS X's Cover Flow view both showed the red cast until this am. Now neither of them do.
Ah ... hang on, I had a second, wide gamut monitor attached to the computer yesterday, mirrored display. Now it's not. I'd been mostly viewing in the main monitor (Macbook Pro), that was the one that was out and I wasn't checking the second monitor much after uploading. I'm willing to bet that was it. Second monitor affecting colour management on the first .....
This is what you are seeing and why everything now looks fine on your MacBook's display, which is NOT wide gamut:
http://www.gballard.net/photoshop/srgb_wide_gamut.html
Here's a screenshot of an sRGB profile ColorChecker image file with and without the profile in FireFox and Chrome browsers. All four browser images look identical on my non-wide gamut display...what do you see?
With sRGB Profile embedded Without sRGB Profile
As long as the images are sRGB profile it doesn't matter whether the color profile is embedded or not. -
Making an image in a pic viewer link to an outside site
I am very new to Flash and have purchased a great set of
tutorials from LearnFlash.com. I am currently taking what was
taught in the "Building Websites in Flash 8" and tweaking my own
site using the ideas. I have a portfolio page that has thumbnails
that when clicked on show in a pic viewer. What I want to happen is
to take the larger image in the pic viewer and be able to click on
it to get to the actual website. Now the guy that teaches in the
tutorials likes to make everything a movie clip. I am not sure that
I can make a button inside the movie clip of the pic viewer. Maybe
some text could show up under the pic viewer giving the name of the
site and they can click on that but I would rather have the image
in the pic viewer take them to the site. Here is the code that is
on the page so far. Any help would be greatly appreciated. This is
in AS 2.0..container {
height: 800px;
width: 1000px;
.head {
background-image: url(header003-1.jpg);
float: left;
height: 200px;
width: 1000px;
.break {
background-image: url(break.jpg);
float: left;
height: 50px;
width: 1000px;
.nav {
background-color: #000;
float: left;
height: 500px;
width: 200px;
overflow: auto;
.navbreak {
background-image: url(verticalBoarderLong.jpg);
height: 500px;
width: 10px;
float: left;
.main {
background-color: #000;
float: left;
height: 500px;
width: 790px;
overflow: auto;
.foot {
background-image: url(break.jpg);
float: left;
height: 50px;
width: 1000px;
#wrapper {
width: 1000px;
margin-right: auto;
margin-left: auto;
<div class="nav"><img src="Contruction.jpg" alt="" name="construction" width="200" height="100" id="construction" /><img name="" src="AboutButton.jpg" width="200" height="100" alt="" /><img name="" src="" width="200" height="100" alt="" /><img name="" src="" width="200" height="100" alt="" /><img name="" src="" width="200" height="100" alt="" /></div> -
Images look blurry in small, medium and large view in ADE
Hi,
I am working on creating an ePub compatible on ADE, iPad, Kobo and Mobi. I have fixed the issue of image overlapping in ADE view by keeping the width as 100%, but the image looks very blurry on ADE.
Does anybody advise?
Thanks,
SathishIt may sound counter-intuitive, but could you try disabling graphics hardware acceleration? Since this feature was added to Firefox, it has gradually improved, but there still are a few glitches.
You usually need to restart Firefox in order for this to take effect, so save all work first (e.g., mail you are composing, online documents you're editing, etc.).
orange Firefox button ''or'' classic Tools menu > Options > Advanced
On the "General" mini-tab, uncheck the box for "Use hardware acceleration when available"
If you restart Firefox, is the issue resolved? -
Why do images within a PDF look jagged when viewed in Acrobat Pro 10.1.6?
Using a MacBook Pro running Mac OS version 10.7.5 with NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M 1024 MB graphics card. High-resolution source images look fine in other software, and embedded images in a PDF look fine when viewed on Google Drive, but curves and diagonal lines look jagged when viewed in Acrobat Pro 10.1.6. Checking smoothing options in Preferences only adjusts the position of the jagged edges; it neither enhances nor ameliorates them.
I created a sample PDF to illustrate the problem I'm having. Created in illustrator, exported to PNG and converted to PDF. Here is a screenshot of the source PNG side-by-side with the PDF I created from it:
Please note that when I preview the PDF in Finder, and when I view the PDF in Chrome using Google Drive, the image looks fine. Here's a link to the sample PDF:
http://www.sendspace.com/file/77f5m6
Any assistance is appreciated. Thanks!Unfortunately, as I mentioned in my original post, I've already tried toggling smoothing options. They don't make the jagged edges go away—they just change them slightly. In some cases, as with the sample file provided, it does help smooth the art out, but it never looks as good as it did going in, in a recent project, toggling smoothing options didn't affect the appearance of the image at all. Zoom does not appear to relieve the artifacting.
A little clarification: this PDF was created from a flat PNG, but I have had this issue with PNGs and TIFFs as well, generated by both Photoshop and Illustrator. To reiterate, the PDFs display fine in other software—Finder preview looks great, and the same file viewed in my browser via Google Drive looks as intended as well. A colleague was able to replicate this issue in Acrobat on his Windows machine. This appears to be a rendering issue specific to Acrobat with regards to the files I use it to create. -
Images (actually graphics) loaded fine in the previous version of firefox, but now do not open in firefox 5. It is our business' website. it opens and looks fine in explorer and other browsers. However, please goto www.trinitystone.biz (using Firefox 5)and look at how the top menu bar has a black box surrounding it and the bottom menu also has this black bar. It is not supposed to be there, if you view the site from IE, you will see what it is supposed to look like. Any help would be appreciated! Thanks
You can modify the pref <b>keyword.URL</b> on the <b>about:config</b> page to use Google's "I'm Feeling Lucky" or Google's "Browse By Name".
* Google "I'm Feeling Lucky": http://www.google.com/search?btnI=I%27m+Feeling+Lucky&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=
* Google "Browse by Name": http://www.google.com/search?ie=UTF-8&sourceid=navclient&gfns=1&q=
* http://kb.mozillazine.org/keyword.URL
* http://kb.mozillazine.org/Location_Bar_search
Maybe you are looking for
-
I have a Gen 4 Ipod Touch, it is still running with IOS 4. When i go to my settings and select <General> there is no <Software Update> button to choose from. How do i update my Ipod to the new IOS system?
-
Excise duty difference in VF02 and J1iin
Hi Experts, We are getting Excise duty values difference in VF02 and J1IIN.We are getting this error for few cases only, and it is not specific to sales org or document type.We are not able to regenerate the same case in development as it is exceptio
-
How do I get all my music in one place?
I'm not sure how this happened but I have music in two different place on my macbook, under Applicaitons and also under "___" (the name of my macbook). Itunes is only recognizing the music in one location. The rest of the music I get "file not found
-
Error while creating SAPJSF user- NW 2004s installation
Hi All, I am installing SAP NetWeaver 2004s ( ABAP + Java) on Linux 64 machine. Operating system is CentOS 5. JDK - 1.6.0_15 ( JDK 1.4.2 is not availble for linux 64 bit on sun site) after starting installation i am getting following error at creat
-
Dead Screen & Need to Transfer Data
I have a Nokia 3555b & the screen is dead. I need someone to walk me through the steps to connect either the USB port or Bluetooth to my PC to transfer the data off of the phone's memory. Thanks... Dean.