Image quality poor when using "fit in window" view

Hello,
i´m getting familiar with PS CS3 Demo and what buffles me is the poor quality of the downsized view of large images. I loaded a 8 MP JPEG image from a digital camera and it looks good in 100%, but when i choose to view the whole image to fit the window (33,33% in my case), the resulting "downsampled" image is very jaggy and pixelated. I use a freeware image viewer called Xnview that gives me a far superior view when viewing large images downsized - i can even choose to select a "HQ" mode so those images get resampled to look better. It it normal that PS does not offer such a thing (or did i not see it?) and delivers such poor visual quality or is there something wrong with my PC?
Thanks for your help.

Though 6.735, 12.5, 25 and 50% views usually are OK too. "Image quality" is great, though sometimes deceivingly so. I guess I don't understand sampling enough to tell you why 33% looks bad (rounding errors, I suppose). But 66% makes sense. You're trying to stuff 3 pixels into the space of 2.
Dave, what are the advantages to these nearest neighbor views instead of bicubic (or even bi-linear). Just speed?
J

Similar Messages

When using private browsing to view image results in Safari 5.1.3, only the first two rows of results are visible, the following four or so rows display greyed out place holders, and the safe search button is inoperable. Suggestions?

When using private browsing to view image results in Safari 5.1.3, only the first two rows of results are visible, the following four or so rows display greyed out place holders, the remainder of the results page is blank, and the safe search button is inoperable. When I turn off private browsing and refresh the page, everything works again.
Anyone else having this problem?

I have got the same behaviour after the last Safari Update to 5.1.3. It seems that Safari now handles some scripts in a new way. If you debug the Google Website, you will see, that there is some Javascript Error, that seems to prevent to write into local cache. After some searching I wasn't able to finde a solution for this problem, other then disabling Javascript while private browsing to prevent the script loading. You then are able to use Google with the old layout. The option to disable JavaScript can be found in the Menu "Developer", wich has to be enabled in Safari in the options first.
In my opinion this is a bug that is now occuring, because Apple changed something in private browsing and that has to be fixed by Google now, to run again. Or we will have to wait for 5.1.4, as you can read online Apple will change and bugfix the javascript engine in that version, perhaps this fixes the problem as well. I hope so!
If anyone is in the developer program perhaps you could test this with the beta of 5.1.4 and tell us if it works.

[svn:fx-trunk] 8961: Fix View Source Window when using a Spark Window.

Revision: 8961
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2009-07-31 11:08:29 -0700 (Fri, 31 Jul 2009)
Log Message:
Fix View Source Window when using a Spark Window.
Turn off the status bar for a Spark Window that is created for View Source.
QE notes: None.
Doc notes: None.
Bugs: SDK-21770
Reviewer: Ryan
Tests run: checkintests
Is noteworthy for integration: no
Ticket Links:
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-21770
Modified Paths:
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/airframework/src/spark/components/WindowedApplication. as

I had downloaded it for test, and requested for evaluation license...
But I haven't got license, and also I am not able to find Flash Builder Plugins from HFCD site....
I think those plugins are removed from site....
Please help me, if anyone have those plugins...

Best practice when using auto complete in view layer

Hello
I have a question regarding best way to store/cash data when using auto complete function in view layer.
I know that there will be a lot of visitors that will use this function and I dont want to kill the application server so I need some advice.
Its about 6000 words that should be searchable .... my first thought was to create a Singleton-bean that stores current items and that I will iterate over but its a lot of "waste" doing that way.
I would be very glad if anyone could advice me how to do this best way if there is any de-facto standard to use when using auto completion in "view layer"
Thanks!
Best Regards/D_S

I dont know what your design is, but here are some ideas:
To me, autocomplete means you have some user specific data that the user entered prevously such as their home address, and some generic data that is not specific to any particular user. I would store all that in a database. For the user specific data I would store their userID along with the data in the database. Then, when populating a JSP page, I would call up just the data specific to that user and the generic data from the database. I would store it as an array of some type in javascript client--side. When the user clicks the autopopulate button, I would have that button call a javascript fuction that reteives the data from the javascript array and populate the various textfields. All this is done client-side so the form does not have to be re-drawn. I question why you have 6000 items. Normally, autopopulate has at most only a few dozens of items. If you still need 6000 items, I suggest adding a textfield to the form to filter what the data he needs down to a manageable amount. Example: rather than get all names from a telephone book, put a textfield on the form that allowfs an end user to enter a letter a to z such as 'b', then only fetch last names from the phone book that begins with 'b'.

Incorrect Results When Using an In-Line View and User Function in 10g

My developers are complaining of incorrect Select statement results when using an in-line view along with a user defined function. Below is the statement:
select test_f(wo1)
from
(SELECT a.WORK_ORDER_NBR, b.work_order_nbr wo1/*, facility_f(A.FACILITY),
A.PLANNER, A.WO_STATUS, mil_date(A.WO_STATUS_DATE)*, A.WORK_ORDER_TYPE,
A.WO_DESCRIPTION
FROM TIDWOWRK A, TIDWOTSK B
WHERE B.WORK_ORDER_NBR(+) = A.WORK_ORDER_NBR))
where wo1 is null;
Test_f() is a user defined function and the above query returns thousands of rows. It should return 308 rows. It is apparent that the target database is not evaluating the "where wo1 is null;" clause.
select to_char(wo1)
from
(SELECT a.WORK_ORDER_NBR, b.work_order_nbr wo1/*, facility_f(A.FACILITY),
A.PLANNER, A.WO_STATUS, mil_date(A.WO_STATUS_DATE)*, A.WORK_ORDER_TYPE,
A.WO_DESCRIPTION
FROM TIDWOWRK A, TIDWOTSK B
WHERE B.WORK_ORDER_NBR(+) = A.WORK_ORDER_NBR))
where wo1 is null;
In the above query return 308 rows. The user function was replaced by an Oracle function. The Where clause is now evaluated correctly.
The query is executed from an Oracle 10g R2 database and retrieves data from a 9.2.0.6 database.
I've seen a little information on Metalink. It appears that there was some trouble in 9i, but were fixed in a 9.2.0.6 patch. I don't see any information about a 10.2.0.2 database.
Anyone have any experiences or a successful solution. I suspect that I will need to report this to Oracle and wait for a patch.
Thanks,
John

I can only think of two reasons for this behaviour:
1) You are executing these two queries from two different users and there is some policy on the table.
2) The function doesn't do an upper, but returns null a lot of times, even when the input is a not null value, like this:
SQL> create table tidwowrk
2 as
3 select 1 id, 'A' work_order_nbr, 'DST' facility from dual union all
4 select 2, null, 'TRN' from dual union all
5 select 3, 'C', 'DST' from dual
6 /
Tabel is aangemaakt.
SQL> create table tidwotsk
2 as
3 select 'A' work_order_nbr from dual union all
4 select 'B' from dual
5 /
Tabel is aangemaakt.
SQL> create or replace function test_f (a in varchar2) return varchar2
2 is
3 begin
4    return case a when 'A' then null else a end;
5 end;
6 /
Functie is aangemaakt.
SQL> select count(*)
2    from ( SELECT a.WORK_ORDER_NBR
3                , test_f(b.work_order_nbr) wo1
4             FROM TIDWOWRK A
5                , TIDWOTSK B
6            WHERE B.WORK_ORDER_NBR(+) = A.WORK_ORDER_NBR
7              and a.facility in ('DST', 'TRN', 'SUB')
8         )
9   where wo1 is null
10 /
                              COUNT(*)
                                     3
1 rij is geselecteerd.
SQL> select count(*)
2    from ( SELECT a.WORK_ORDER_NBR
3                , to_char(b.work_order_nbr) wo1
4             FROM TIDWOWRK A, TIDWOTSK B
5            WHERE B.WORK_ORDER_NBR(+) = A.WORK_ORDER_NBR
6              and a.facility in ('DST', 'TRN', 'SUB')
7         )
8   where wo1 is null
9 /
                              COUNT(*)
                                     2
1 rij is geselecteerd.Regards,
Rob.

When using iphoto I can view the photos but when I double click on a photo it becomes a black box with a white circle on the screen

When using iphoto, I can view the photos but when I double click on 1 specific photo it enlarges to a black box with a large white circle in it...doesn't matter which photo I click on the end result is the same...black box with a white circle.

Hello michelefox17
It's sounds like you may need to rebuild your iPhoto Library. The article below has the steps on how do that.
iPhoto 6 and later: Rebuilding the iPhoto library
http://support.apple.com/kb/ht2638
If your issues persist then you may want to contact Apple Support
Contact Apple Support
http://www.apple.com/support/contact/
Hope that help,
-Griff W.

Color Settings: Getting colors in PS CC to match colors of the image when used as a Windows Background

or vice versa. I probably do not know enough to be able to ask the question properly.
The colors of photos in PS CC are not the same when used as a desktop background in Windows 7. The colors are somewhat more saturated when as a background on the desktop and while not totally unusable, it would be nice to have matching color between my PS editing screen and the photo as viewed as a desktop background.
The following are some conditions that may or may not be relevant to the answer of my following question.
1.) I am a complete novice to Color Management so a presumption of knowledge and the heavy use of jargon may not penetrate my head.
2.) I shoot with sRGB embedded in my photos.
3.) My RAW conversions use sRGB IEC61966 - 2.1.
4.) My PS Color Settings are North American General Purpose 2 with sRGB IEC61966 - 2.1 as the working space and Intent as Relative Colormetric
5.) In the Win 7 Control Panel>Color Management>Device, my Device = NEC LCD2690wuxi, ICC Profile = NEC LCD2690wuxi (default), file name = nl269wui.icm
6.) In the Win 7 Control Panel>Color Management>Advanced, Device profile = System Default sRGB IEC61966 - 2.1 and (everything else set to System Defaults too). The only difference from the PS Color Settings being that Windows is defaulted to Perceptual Intent, but a change in either PS or Win 7 has no effect on the relative color differences.
7.) The monitor is set to the Native internal preset, but the relative differences in color remain the same even if the monitor is changed to sRGB, or any other internal preset.
8.) I have Proof Setup set to Monitor RGB but none of the settings will match the Win 7 Background color.
Now, my question is this. How would you set up your color settings/profile in PS and/or Windows to match color between PS and the Windows desktop of Windows 7?

Nevermind. I didn't have Proof Colors checked.

Please help! Elements 11 image quality poor compared to LR

Hello, I just started using elements and am very irritated because the image quality is very poor compared to when i am viewing in LR. Its not the conversion - i have tried pulling directly from the camear. It looks great in Camera Raw 7.1 but the second i pull it into editor, it lines get jagged. Adobe help is telling me this is normal. Surely not?? Something about a halo around pixels? Image on left is Elements 11, right is Lightroom and Zoomed in so you can see how sharp it is. PLEASE help. im so frustrated!

In the pse 11 editor are you looking at the image at 100% view (actual pixels)?
(Other viewing percents can be misleading in the pse 11 editor)
Double click on the zoom tool in the tol box to get 100% view.
Also you should be on camera raw 7.4 available from Help>Updates within the pse 11 editor.
Is that lightroom 4.4?

Still image quality poor, Help

I posted a similar question last night. This one is more of the same.
Issue: Poor image quality (flickering, Jumping) when viewing stills on my TV only...
I have made 2 test videos. One was made in FCE and one in iMovie8. Both are identical and consist of only 5 still pictures. I added motion to a couple of pics in each test. The video from iMovie looks great on my TV. The video fro FCE looks very poor. The image is jumpy and flickering.
Why does the same movie movie look different depending on the source? What is different? Do I have something set up incorrectly in FCE?
I tried applying the De-interlacing filter and the Flicker filter. I tried all variants of the De-interlace filter, ie odd/even. I have made several exports from FCE trying to get rid of the flicker/jumpy-ness to no avail.....Even the still pics that have no movement flicker a bit from FCE, for example, one of the pictures are of my son holding a dark green fishing rod while standing in a tent. The picture has no movement but the fishing rod and tent poles are flickering, almost like there are lights in them blinking on and off. A similar picture that has movement shows the fishing rod as alternating dark and light lines instead of just a dark green rod. The same pics from the iMovie clip look great. The color is correct and no flickering at all.
To export from FCE I am using Quick Time Movie. From iMovie 8, I am using 'Export Movie' high quality. On each video I then just dropped them into iDVD and viewed on my TV.
I am a new user to FCE and so far I like it much better than iMovie 6 or 8. I have a hard time believing that the still picture quality output form FCE is worse than iMovie. So I must be doing something wrong.
Thank you in advanced for help,
Toshiro

Well I can only assume that there is a difference in the way the data is handled between the 2 apps. I have resolved my issue by not compressing the data while exporting. Unfortunately, my 3 minute video is 7G !!...oh well
...now if I could just get rid of the thin green line at the bottom of the screen during my opening segment it would be great....
Thanks for taking the time to assist
Toshiro

DV7-3079wm webcam image quality poor

I've had this laptop almost 2 yrs, but never used the webcam until recently. My nephew wanted me to sign up for Sykpe. Anyway even using the HP MediaSmart software, the webacm image is washed out and blurry. I can take the laptop outsife on battery and try to take snap shots. The image have too much contrast and out of focus.
Is this a software or hardware issue?
I had pruchased a 2 yr extended warrantee and sent it to Warranty Logistics, but they found 'nothing wrong.' Needless to say I won't be buying extended warrantees again.

Hi @mzdymond01
Thank You for the inquiry, I will do my best to assist you!
I understand you received this notebook at Christmas and image quality of the WebCam is poor.
Have you done all your Windows updates?
Have you tried Using automated troubleshooting (Windows 8)?
Have you ran the HP Support Assistant to assist with HP updates?
Here is a link to Webcam Troubleshooting (Windows 8) that will guide you through some steps.
If the issue should remain I suggest contacting HP support for further assistance. As this is a new product you want to ensure everything is performing as it should.
Please call our technical support at 800 474 6836. If you live outside the US/Canada Region, please click the link below to get a support number for your region.
World Wide Phone Support
Best of Luck!
Sparkles1
I work on behalf of HP
Please click “Accept as Solution ” if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
Click the “Kudos, Thumbs Up" on the bottom right to say “Thanks” for helping!

Div Background Image...Resize To Fit Browser Window...???

[b]hello again[/b]...
I would like to have a background image (.jpg) automatically resize to fit any browser's window...& I read somewhere on the web it should be accomplished by placing the image in a layer (as a background image); & then set the layer size to 100%.
can someone please tell me how the coding goes for this...?
[or...if that [i]is[/i] in fact the correct approach? I don't care if it's html or css...I just want it to work. (&...I'm starting off w/ a larger image (so resolution doesn't get lost when going bigger)]
thanks very much,
[b]mark4man[/b]
btw - I should add that it's the image's [i]WIDTH[/i] I'm interested in resizing...while it's aspect ration remains in tact.

http://css-tricks.com/how-to-resizeable-background-image/
For the record, I'm not a big fan of huge background images on web pages. They take forever to load on slow connections. And some mobile devices won't display them at all. So all that weight just for eye candy is kind of a waste IMO.
I think the safest, most practical way to achieve backgrounds that fill available viewport is to use a small, seemless tile and repeat horizontally, vertically or both.
More on background-images:
http://alt-web.com/Backgrounds.shtml
Nancy O.
Alt-Web Design & Publishing
Web | Graphics | Print | Media Specialists
www.alt-web.com/
www.twitter.com/altweb
www.alt-web.blogspot.com

CP5 simulation image quality poor

I am a very new CP5 user. I have successfully run the software simulation process with one problem. The image quality of the output file when previewing the project "bands" the images and distorts gradients. I am capturing images from Firefox on the web, using a MacBookPro with 4GB memory over a wireless internet connection.
So far everything else is working great -- really need help figuring out this image quality because the result is not acceptable. Thanks!

Hi there,
Multi select all the slides
In the Slides Property PI, Change the Slide Quality to - Optimized or High.
Invoke the Publish dialog and Enable "Force Re-Publish" and hit publish
Let us know if this solves your issue.
-Ashwin Bharghav B

Can't see certain things (invisible) when using internet on Windows 7.

I think this is a Windows 7 issue I am having. I just got my Ideapad with Windows 7. When using both Internet Explorer and Firefox, certain text, image, and boxes are invisible..or so faint I can barely see them. Fox example, as I type this, I see no box under subjet. All that I see is white space. I have to tab around to find the boxes to type in. Same thing with this text box where I am typing now. There is no box. Another example is the streets on a map in google maps...the smaller white streets are almost invisible. Since this is happening in both IE and Firefox, I am thinking it must be a Windows 7 issue. Anyone know how to fix it?

Actually I just figured this out today after receiving no help from customer service (i talked to 2 agents) and pretty much you need to update the drivers. for my laptop i have the nvidia. You just go to their website and there is this option there that will let you search for the current one you have on your laptop. It will also give you the driver for it to update. I updated it with the new driver and bam....i got text boxes!!

Image quality reduced when scaled down on black background

I am trying to view two tracks at the same time so I have scaled them down. Once I rendered them, the quality was horrible and then I changed the background to checkerboard instead of black, which worked, but I would like a black background for viewing, so how do I fix the poor image quality problem?

I'm guessing you're making this judgement in the Canvas. You really can't. Check it on an external CRT, and make sure your render settings are all set to their highest. Just because it plays back or evven has a proxy render doesn't mean you're seeing its highest quality.
Are you saying that when you put them over a different background the quality improved? I don't know why that would be, bbut if it works then try putting a slug on V1 as a black background.
Or by checkerboard you mean you set the Canvas to a different mode...?

Photo become more dark than IE when using Facebook on Windows 8

Dear
I install firefox 18.0.1 on windows 8 for my PC. When i access to facebook, almost picture on my facebook page became a litte darkness. I compare to Chrome it's same. But when I compare to IE, every picture became normal, same when I using Firefox on windows 7 at other PC.
Could you tell me how to fix this problem?

Do these images have an embedded color profile?
That can be caused by a problem with the color profile for your display monitor or color profiles embedded in images.<br />
You can disable color management to test that.<br />
You can set the gfx.color_management.mode pref to 0 on the about:config page to disable Color Management.<br />
You need to close and restart Firefox to make the change effective.
See:
* http://kb.mozillazine.org/gfx.color_management.mode

Image quality poor when using "fit in window" view

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for