Image size lightroom 4.4

i have been having ongoing issues with very small image sizes, each time I send (by e-mail) or upload direct (web-based) the company gets back to me saying the image size is way too small ???
I have a nikon d5200 (24 million pixels) and all shots were in RAW
H E L P

"I don't know what size I sent them ! how can you tell that informtion ? all I know is I sent images and they replied with ''its way too small'' "
In that case you had better describe how you went about obtaining a jpg file for sending and how you did the actual sending. I can tell you what I would have done:
1. I would have cropped the image to a 3:5 shape (aspect ratio).
2. Using either a right-click or the File menu, I would have selected "Export".
3. I would have set the export dialog for a jpg, sRGB space, quality 80, Resize box checked, long side 50 cm., resolution 300 ppi.
4. I would have exported the jpg to a convenient location in my computer, like the Desktop.
5. I would have gone to the internet site of my chosen printer and following their instructions uploaded the jpg file to them.
6. I would have deleted the jpg after the uploading was completed.
Now it's your turn. What did you do?

Similar Messages

  • Image size changes when moving an image between Lightroom and CC.

    Image size changes when moving an image between Lightroom and CC.
    I opened a .dng image in LR and then opened it in the Develop module.  I clicked on Crop Overlay and then on the ‘As Shot’ drop down menu (the lock is closed) and cropped to 11 x 17 and clicked ‘Done’-.
    I click Cntl-E and the image opens in CC.  There I click on Image > Image Size and the Image Size  is 13.288 inches by 20.533 inches.
    Why does the image size change?
    I believe there is a menu to control the size of the image and I've looked everywhere I can think of in LR and CC, I googled various descriptions and I checked two of Scott Kelby's books, but I just can't figure out how to keep the image a consistent size when moving between LR and CC.
    Help!...Please?

    The penny will drop soon or maybe the cloud will lift.
    In Lightroom all editing is undoable/nondestructive.
    Hence a crop of 3x2 is not inches, centimetres, pixels or anything else. It is jst a ratio. When a file is exported, either to PS or disk, then the crop ratio has size determined in respect of pixels and inches or cms.
    So my 6000x5000 pixel image I will crop to 3x2 that leaves (before exporting) a 6000x4000 file.
    Now when exported it can be set to export at
    100pixels per inch and will end up at 60x40" when printed.
    200pixels per inch will end up at 30x20"
    300ppi will end at 20x13.3"
    You will notice in the Crop Tool there are no size denominations such as inches or centimetres as an image file only has pixels and the determination of size is done through exporting or printing.
    Hope that helps somewhat..

  • Hi there! So I am using Lightroom 3 on a pc and I have ran into an issue when exporting images. The DPI and image size (in inches) that I am selecting during the export process. For example I just exported a collection and set the dpi to 180 and the size

    Hi there! So I am using Lightroom 3 on a pc and I have ran into an issue when exporting images. The DPI and image size (in inches) that I am selecting during the export process. For example I just exported a collection and set the dpi to 180 and the size to 7 inches on the long edge. My exported result is 457 dpi and sized at 3200x2134 pixels.. Any ideas on why this is happening and what I can do to correct it?

    The DPI setting in a digital image has no meaning at all. You need to learn how to calculate what you need in your exported image. The only measurement in a digital image that has any meaning is the number of pixels in each direction. It doesn't matter what you set that DPI to (actually it's PPI or pixels per inch). The image will have the same number of pixels regardless of the setting. If you need an image that is 5 x 7" (for example) at 200 PPI then you would want an image that measured:
    5 x 200 = 1000 pixels
    7 x 200 = 1400 pixels
    So you would need an image that is 1000 x 1400 pixels to have a 5 x 7" image at 200 PPI. The reason your exported image had such a high PPI setting is because you specified the number of inches you wanted the image to be. And there were enough pixels in the image that it calculated out to be that high PPI setting.
    I apologize, I don't explain this very well. But you need to learn to do the math to determine how large you really want your exported images to be.

  • I am trying to get a photo printed in canvas, b0 size. The original photo is 5472 x 3648 px, 193x128 cm.  What happens is: if I adjust the photo in Photoshop it keeps the image size but if I import it into Lightroom to adjust it there, the photo is being

    I have checked all the settings when importing..the maximum size Lightroom will keep it is 30x 40cm... Lightroom is doing it to all the photos I import into the program.
    I need to be able to export my image from Lightroom in its original size and stop Lightroom of making it smaller.. Any clue on what should I try?
    Thanks!
    Carol

    Digital files don't have sizes in centimeters or inches, meters or yards. They have only pixels. If LR is not changing the number of pixels, it is not changing the digital image. When the image is printed, the number of pixels packed into every inch has a large effect on the quality of the print. This is the pixels per inch number, or "ppi". For a smooth print paper it is generally accepted that 300 ppi produces optimum quality, but for canvas a lower ppi, as low as 150 even, will do. Unfortunately, your camera puts a tag on the digital file which sets a default ppi of only 72. The reason is very anachronistic and silly and is a hangover from 30 years ago when Apple monitors had a resolution of 72 dpi, a measure long ago abandoned. That tag is misleading because it gives the impression that a very large print can be made from the pixels just as they come from the camera (the smaller the ppi, the larger the print) and some beginners think that is the only size print that can be made. But that not true. It is only a default tag, a suggestion, and it can be disregarded or changed (LR changes it to 240 ppi) and any sized print made. The real, operative, ppi will be the pixel dimensions divided by the print dimensions. Your image with all its pixels (uncropped other than to the 1:1.4 paper ratio) will have an operative 93 ppi on b0 paper which is a bit low. I would suggest using LR's resize function to double it to 7296 pixels on the short side.

  • Lightroom - FIlter by image size (cropped or dimension)?

    Is there no way in Lightroom to filter a catalogue by the image size?
    The new filter system in V2 appears compact and tidy, but I can't believe there is not a method to filter by all information contained in the Metadata list? Any help gratefully appreciated. Thanks

    _Moon_ wrote:
    So, there's nothing I could do within Bridge? Is there any other Adobe application that would be able to do this that isn't Lightroom?
    As I stated you can use the Bridge Search (Find) function.

  • How can I create life size images in Lightroom's Book module?

    I want to scan something and place it in a book without scaling the original up or down. I have not found a way to do this – Lightroom only tells me what percentage of the image is showing and it can be at any scale. Can anyone say how I should go about this?

    You are not doing anything wrong - except to try this in the Lr Book Module.
    The Lr Book Module is not a full fledged book layout program, and many things that you expect for a book layout program can't be done.
    I would not be so "picky" as to wanting to avoid any up- or downsampling.
    But if you absolutely have to, use Blurb Booksmart or Adobe InDesign to do this. In Blurb Booksmart you can design an image box to exact dimensions in inches.
    In Lr you cannot do this, a feature that many users want but it seems that Adobe is adamant that templates is the way to go. Lr 5 beta has not changed this.
    You can download Blurb Booksmart free of charge from Blurb's website. You will like the freedom of page design that Booksmart offers.
    Disadvantages: Your workflow is more complicated than using the Book Module in Lr. And you are bound to print with Blurb.
    With Booksmart you have to export the images from Lr to a specific folder from which Booksmart loads the images. But every time you change an image in Lr you have to export it again and load it again in Booksmart.
    If you also use the Blurb plug-in for Lr you can create a Blurb Publish Service. Changes to an image that has already been published have to be re-published in Lr but the changes will "carry through" into the book automatically.
    Finally, I question whether you can actually test the size of an image in the Lr Book Module by printing the page with your printer. There are reports on this forum that the printed image size is not exactly as shown in the Lr Print Module. I have observed this too with my printer. Mostly the printed image is about 1/8 of an inch larger than in the Lr Print Module. The reason might lie in how the printer translates pixels into ink droplets - just a guess of mine.

  • Lightroom 2.5 Image Size When Printing

    I have searched and tried several approaches, but cannot get LR to adjust an image size correctly when printing. 
    For example, I have a Lab Test Page tif image that has a document size of 23" W x 29" H and a resolution of 180 ppi.
    I can use CSR 4 Image/Image Size to change this to 8" W x 10.5" H and a resolution of 320 ppi using resampling. The reduced image prints correctly in CSR 4 on 8.5" x 11" paper and results in .25" margins top and bottom. The same thing happens in LR 2.5 with the size reduced image.
    However, if I try to print the original image using LR 2.5 to automatically resize the image it does not work correctly. I have tried all sorts of combinations of settings to get it to reduce the image (as is done in CSR 4) and print with .25" top/bottom margins without success. The image fails to resize correctly.
    Is this a bug, a feature??, or operator error? Can anyone tell how to make LR 2.5 automatically resize so it prints correctly? I have tested this on other computers with the same results.
    Thanks
     

    Go to print module.
    Select Print to jpg.
    Set the resolution at 180 ppi.
    Other output settings, sharpening, paper profile as required.
    Set the margin sizes as required.
    Set the cell size to the size of the image
    Set the Custom File Dimensions to the size of the paper...29" x 23" in this case.
    You can drag the Cell size and the various borders around until you get exactly the lay out on paper you require. Then when finished hit print to file, name the file and the job is done.
    If you want to print a a different size, with a different resolution, on different sized paper, with different borders all this can be done in the print module and it is WYSIWYG so no guess work (or calculations) involved. Using LR rather than PS for this also has the advantage of using much better algorithms for upsizing images than PS and applying output sharpening for the specific media type you intend to print to, all using the RAW data

  • Lightroom 1.4.1:  Reducing File/Image Size for Web/E-Mail

    This should be a simple thing.
    I need to reduce my file size to upload it into various things on the web and e-mail and what not.  Sometimes it asks for a specific size.
    Right now, I'm using the Export function to do this, which means I have to reset the Image Settings each time in order to get to the size required.
    Isn't there and easier way to do this, like just type in the image size you want and have the program reset the image proportionately?
    Is there a ratio chart for this, like 1000 x 1400 = # of bytes?
    This is a function used all the time--I can't believe it's this cumbersome.

    Banktank wrote:
    (a)     How do I know I am selecting the correct pixel size for e-mail?  Just keep hunting and pecking until I find the right mix or is there a number combination that works consistently?  And if the latter is correct, what is that number combination.
    I just can't believe that reducing the MP size to get it in shape for an e-mail "thumbprint" photo is this tough.  Even with the 'preset', I'd have to set up a preset for every picture because they vary by MP and the scaling seems to change.
    There is no "standard" size for sending images via email. Just make it small. There is a save for email preset in recent releases of Lr. You can download the demo and see what that entails.
    You don't have to create a preset for each picture. I don't know what you would say that. Yes, the amount it compress varies with the information in the image, but this has always been the case with JPEGs. You don't have to make an image that is exactly some size. You just have to make it small enough for most MTAs and MUAs to handle. Since there is no real standard for this, just make it small enough for you.
    Something like 800px on the longest side, 70-80% quality should do it to find the JPEG compression sweet-spot.

  • Image size and profiles in Aperture;

    version 3.0.3.
    First problem is I can't see where I can fix the image size before getting to the print page! I prefer to do this and preview it before printing, as I used to in PS and then Lightroom.
    Other problem is that Aperture tells me to turn off my printer colour management, but I can't get to such a control from the HP B9180 driver that is now part of OSX (10.6).
    Help please!

    Pat,
    You don't need to set the image size as such. The image prints on the page according to two sets of criteria:
    1. Whether you set dpi to custom or a specific value, and
    2. The page margins you set either as a printing once-off, or as a new printing pre-set.
    For example, I print "arty" photos in a portrait format on A4 matte paper. Left and right margins are around 3cm, top margin is around 3cm, bottom margin is around 5 cm (all numbers are from memory...). I have a title just below the image.
    I created this particular page setup for a certain photo and liked it so much I saved it as another print preset. Any photo I print using that preset fits within the margins defined. The very next print might be the same photo, but this time printing A3+ on Ilford Galerie Smooth Pearl. Choose the photo, select the relevant print pre-set, print. Re-sizing is irrelevant - the print in both cases is coming from the processed raw at maximum resolution.
    Regards,
    Calx

  • Image size and resolution question.

    Is an image at W 48.667 x H 32.444 inches at 72 res the same as an image that I could convert in photoshop to 300 res and then the with "Resample Image" clicked off would be W 11.68 x H 7.78 at 300 res for printing purposes? I'm asking this questions because after exporting 200 images from Lightroom 1.4, putting them into an wedding album I realized the images were not at 300 res but the first size listed above. I'm trying not to have to rebatch and have to put them back into the album. I sent the question to NAPP and got this back"
    "If you do the math you'll see that the answer is "no."
    48x72=3456 pixels; 32x72=2304 pixels
    11.68x300=3504 pixels; 7.78x300=2334 pixels."
    I did the math and it comes up to 5760 vs 5830. Pretty darn close. So would an image printed out with both settings print the about the same quality or am I missing something?
    Thanks
    Bob

    Bob's question is a common one. And one of the first that most of us struggled to understand. Let's see if I can shed some light to help clarify the matter.
    o The image starts out with a given number of pixels from the camera, scanner, or whatever was its source. The resolution only matters when it comes time to print the image.
    72 dpi was once a common resolution for displaying on a computer monitor. Today 90 dpi is more common monitor resolution.
    o Let's assume that the image is 3504 x 2336 pixels (which I got from his size @ 72 dpi).
    o In "image size", if you do _not_ have 'resample image' checked, all you are doing is _rescaling the image. The image resolution is whatever you enter ...
    For example, if you enter 360 dpi -- the native printing resolution of many Epson printers -- you get a print size of 9.733 x 6.489 inches
    o Let's say you want to print this image at 360 dpi in portrait on 13 x 19 inch paper with a one inch border on the sides. That would make the short dimension of the image 11 inches and the long would work out to 16.5.
    To do that you need to _resample_ the image to change the size. More pixels will be made. The resolution stays at 360 dpi. So check the 'resample image' box.
    After resampling to get the print size and resolution you want, the pixel dimension goes to 5960 x 3960 (from 3504 x 2336). Those new pixels came at a price, but that is a matter for another thread and a lot of personal bias.
    Hope that helped.
    P.S. The answer to your question, Bob, is yes. With resample off in PhotoShop, your original images should have gone to 11.68 x 7.787 inches @300 dpi.
    In looking at the rest of your original post, it seems that the export didn't work the way that you wanted. Do I read right that the images turned out to be 11.68 x 7.787 @ 72 dpi? Can't help with that as I don't do Lightroom.

  • Advanced Sort, Filter (color, image size), DUPLICATES, face recognition, GUI customizeability

    Hi,
    here are some of my Lightroom Feature Requests (maybe later more):
    - Filter based on image size. Example: show me all photos with a resolution of 1600x1200 or less.
    - More complex filtering. Example: show me all photos from the Collection A that are tagged with keyword 'k1' and 'k2' but not with keyword 'k3' and that are in the date range d1-d2 and were made with camera model X.
    - Automatic portrait/human face recognition
    - Sort and filter by color! Example: show me all photos that are mostly green (blue, yellow, red, ...)
    - Intelligent recognition and optional deletion of duplicates. Calculate some kind of fingerprint for each photo (file size won't do I guess) so that it will be possible to recognize duplicates EVEN if they are of different image resolution or orientation (landscape, portrait), i.e. really based on CONTENT of the image!
    - Make the components in the side panels movable so that the user can arrange his/her own panel with the components he uses most and on that side of the screen where he wants it.
    Besides that: I LOVE Lightroom. A GREAT product!! Use it A LOT!
    Nice greetings from Germany,
    Stefan.

    I second that.
    "More complex filtering. Example: show me all photos from the Collection A that are tagged with keyword 'k1' and 'k2' but not with keyword 'k3' and that are in the date range d1-d2 and were made with camera model X."
    This should be relatively easy to do. Most other DAMs in the market, e.g. ACDSee, do have this feature. It doesn't really becomes a real database until you have this feature.
    "Intelligent recognition and optional deletion of duplicates."
    Another great feature in ACDSee. Somehow it finds duplicates, even if filenames and dates are different, shows the different photos and gives you an option on what to do.

  • Image size limit in Lr 5.3-64 and Ps CC-64

    What is image size limit in Lightroom 5.3 - 64 bit And Ps CC - 64 bit?

    I believe the maximum image size in Lightroom is 64kpixels X 64kpixels.
    I don't know what it is for Photoshop, but I'll bet that Google thing can find out.

  • Exporting Images from Lightroom 4 | The Complete Picture with Julieanne Kost | Adobe TV

    In this Episode of The Complete Picture, Julieanne demonstrates the advantage of setting up presets in Lightroom to simultaneously export images to multiple file types, sizes, compression settings etc. You might find even find this method more powerful than Photoshop’s Image Processor!
    http://adobe.ly/QQ1iKx

    Hi Julieanne, currently I do have several Export Presets set up so that a specific image can be exported in various sizes, I believe I have 4-5 presets. 
    Question:
    I would like now to select an image and have "all my various image size presets" run at once without me having to select each of the presets, the method I currently use.
    Is that possible?
    Don J J Carroll
    [email protected]

  • Web Flash Gallery: Problem setting Large Images size

    When using the Lightroom Flash Gallery I am not able to change the size of the Large Images (Web | Appearance | Large Images | Size). When I set the size to Medium or Small, the large images always ends up with the same size as when set to Large. Only when setting the size to Extra Large there is a slight change in size.
    How can I change the Large Images size to Medium and Small?
    Jørgen Johanson

    jools2005 wrote:
    Adobe please address this issue.
    This is a User to User forum not official Adobe support. Yes, Adobe staff may participate from time to time, but not often enough that you can depend on them reading your post. Therefore, I suggest that you support a bug report using the facilities provided at https://www.adobe.com/cfusion/mmform/index.cfm?name=wishform

  • Setting the image size?

    How would I set a specific image size to my photo, not an aspect ratio, but a specific image size such as 8"X9" ? I need this feature when I shoot tethered and have the specific size of a layout to adhere to an want to make sure my crop fits the layout perfectly, Thanks

    Jim gave you the RIGHT answer on how Lightroom works with crop size but if you want to see a 8x9 box on the screen you can create an overlay and then you will not have to have the crop tool turned on.
    Layout Overlay view > Martin Evening on Importing Photos in Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 4
    Lightroom 4 Layout Overlay Options - YouTube

Maybe you are looking for

  • How to get music from ipod into itunes?

    i cannot find the way to import my music whuich is already onto the ipod into the itunes folder? i reformatted my computer and transferred all my music files onto the ipod to save them but i cannot get them back onto the computer!! thanks a great dea

  • Problem to get file with special characters in the message

    Hi, I'm developing an application that read the email and save the attached file. However, some files have special characters in the name, like: Documento de EspecificaÇÂO.doc I noticed the de name of the file in de message head is: "=?iso-8859-1?Q?D

  • Issue with weblogic.jar parsing the wsdl

    Hi, Here is a very small program, for which i am facing the problem of getting the types from the wsdl. It works fine, as standalone....You do not have to deploy the code any where..just have weblogic.jar in the classpath. It does not work. It works

  • Power Source Help

    My Kt333 Ultra is doing fine. Excelent Mobo. Since installed PCAlert, randomly get warnings because of 12 v. limit beeing surpassed to 13.1 v. No problem with temp. Was wondering if is possible to put a resist. in 12 v. out line to assure the 12 v li

  • Dot1q and 6248 Interconnects Connectivity

    Hello, Is dot1q supported on the 6248 Interconnects? We have a few 3750's and we have FC connected from the 3750's to the interconnects with the following configuration: Int gx/x/x Switchport mode trunk Switchport trunk encap dot1q Switchport trunk a