Image size/quality on N79 gallery: thumbnails only...

On my N79, if I use the gallery to browse through my pictures, it shows thumbnails correctly, but if I try to view an image at full-screen, or zoom in on it, all I get is the thumbnail-sized image! Should I be waiting for images to buffer or is this something else that will have to wait for the next Software Update.
(Images are being saved at the correct size, they look fine on my computer or in the camera app.)
Help I'm trapped in a sig factory.

Turns out I just had to wait a moment or two longer, it works fine.
Help I'm trapped in a sig factory.

Similar Messages

  • Free Transform Vs. Image Size - Quality Impact?

    I'm using Photoshop CS3 and I have a quick query regarding the difference in image quality between resizing an image using 'Image Size' compared to 'Free Transform'.
    I'm laying out several individual photographs on to a page (with some precision) and therefore using the transform function to scale the image to the right size is certainly the quickest and easiest option. However, I have always been keen to ensure maximum image quality and I don't know if this will degrade the image more than resizing the image using 'image size' before pasting it (obviously with a lot more effort involved).
    Any thoughts?

    Many thanks for your replies - that's very useful.
    I should have mentioned that I will always be resizing down. Also, when performing my standard method for resizing (using Image Size) I always stick to the standard Bicubic then follow up with sharpening (specific for my output). What you've told me is great as it means I can simply perform the transform of each image and then an output sharpening on the entire canvas. This should be equivalent to resizing, sharpening and then copy-paste of individual images to the same canvas.
    Using smart objects (which I seldom do at the moment) is an interesting thought, which I'll have to look into. I could copy a smart object from each of my source files, resize and then perform a smart object sharpening to them...
    Many thanks again!

  • Image size in iBooks Author 'Gallery' when at full page

    Hi
    I'me looking to make an image gallery (c 40 images)  to fill a complete landscape page in IBAuthor
    I now need to get the images from the photographers.
    I was told to request them in the size below but I've just noticed that in the gallery format at full screen, the images look to be a different size due to the thumbnails at the bottom which I wish to include (I know you can untick this option)
    Can anyone advise me if I need to ask for more or different information?
    Specifically should I ask for images at 1024x768 pixels or at another size?
    Many thanks.
    Chris
    Working with images
    Photo should no larger than 500-600 kb each. iBookstore will ony accept books up to 2.0 GB for publication so I keep the size down for best results and to avoid performance issues.
    The (older) iPad display has a 1024x768 pixel screen so this should be the maximum size of the image. To make sure that all ipad users can view images to the best effect.
    Use JPG for opaque raster images and PNG for transparent raster images whenever possible.
    Use an RGB color profile in your images to improve size and processing time
    Cover images should be 1400 pixels wide in the smaller dimension

    I'm guessing that they will be jpegs but I can ask for them in any format you consider best. I guess that's part of the question. The notes above say:
    Use JPG for opaque raster images and PNG for transparent raster images whenever possible.
    Use an RGB color profile in your images to improve size and processing time
    Which format should I ask for?
    Thanks

  • Photo Gallery thumbnails in business catalyst render in different sizes in different browsers

    Photo Gallery thumbnails in business catalyst render in different sizes in safari and chrome but are fine in firefox. What is the issue with Safari? I have tried the different algorithm options such as fill_proportional etc and firefox is the only browser that displays correctly. I thought safari was the most standards compatible browser - what's the problem here?

    Hi,
    If you have seperate XML file but with the same basic structure then you can change the XML a Spry dataset refers to and regenerate the spry region without reloading the full page.
    So on my photo gallery page I can change the album the photos are shown from via the seturl sprydata function as below.  dsPhotos being my Spry dataset that points to the relevant XML dataset with my image references and captions etc.  My XML is actually dynamically generated from Picasa RSS feeds (and RSS feeds are XML) but the principle will be the same with your static XML.
    First I add an event listener for when someone clicks on an album (the li tag within my div with the id "albums" holds a photo and title for each album.)
    function Albums()
    var myalbums = Spry.$$("#albums li", "TabbedPanels1")
    var rows = dsAlbums.getData();
    var setListener = function( element, value )
      Spry.Utils.addEventListener( element, "click", function(){ showAlbum( value ); },false );
    for( var i = 0, length = myalbums.length; i < length; i++ )
      setListener( myalbums[i], i );
    Then this is the code which changes the photo album to be shown. (when the user clicks the relevant album)
    function showAlbum(i)
    pauseShow();
    pImage = 'No';
    var rows = dsAlbums.getData();
    var albumid = rows[i]["albumid"];
    var url = "xml/PicasaAphotoFeed.asp?albumid=" + albumid;
    dsPhotos.setURL(url);
    dsPhotos.loadData();
    var rowcount = dsAlbums.getRowCount() - 1;
    var nextalbum;
    var navnext;
    var n;
    The page is here www.thehmc.co.uk/photo5.html is you want to see it in context.
    In your case showAlbum would switch between Frank.xml or Wolfie.xml depending on how you decide to name your xml datasets.
    Regards
    Phil

  • Gallery without XML definition of image size

    Hello,
    In my application, the images are actually created on the
    fly. So knowing the exact dimensions at the time the XML is created
    was a bit troublesome, since some images can be landscape, some can
    be portrait, and they all can have different aspect ratios. So, in
    it's original form, the gallery script didn't work very well for
    me. Last night, I sought out a solution that would not require the
    sizes to be in the XML file. Below is my refactored SetMainImage
    function. Where the original version of this function downloads the
    image after the opacity is reduced, this one starts by loading the
    new image, then uses the Size effect to resize the frame to the new
    image's size.
    Hope this helps somebody else! Spry certainly has helped
    me!!!!!! Thank you Adobe!
    Peace,
    Matt
    function SetMainImage(imgPath, tnID)
    var img = document.getElementById("mainImage");
    if (!img) {
    return;
    CancelBehavior("mainImage");
    Spry.Utils.SelectionManager.clearSelection("thumbnailSelection");
    if (tnID) {
    Spry.Utils.SelectionManager.select("thumbnailSelection",
    document.getElementById(tnID), "selectedThumbnail");
    if (gImageLoader)
    gImageLoader.onload = function() {};
    gImageLoader = null;
    // Use an image loader to make sure we only fade in the new
    image after
    // it is completely loaded.
    gImageLoader = new Image();
    gImageLoader.onload = function()
    gBehaviorsArray["mainImage"] = new Spry.Effect.Opacity(img,
    GetOpacity(img), 0, { duration: 400,
    finish: function()
    gBehaviorsArray["mainImage"] = new
    Spry.Effect.Size(img.parentNode, GetDimensions(img.parentNode), {
    width: gImageLoader.width, height: gImageLoader.height}, {duration:
    400, steps: 10,
    finish: function()
    img.src = gImageLoader.src;
    gImageLoader = null;
    gBehaviorsArray["mainImage"] = new Spry.Effect.Opacity(img,
    0, 1, { duration: 400, steps: 10, finish: function() {
    gBehaviorsArray["mainImage"] = null; }});
    gBehaviorsArray["mainImage"].start();
    } // End finish function for Size call.
    }); // End params for size call
    gBehaviorsArray["mainImage"].start();
    } // End finish function for first Opacity call.
    }); // end parameters for first opacity call
    gBehaviorsArray["mainImage"].start();
    }; // End gImageLoader function
    gImageLoader.src = imgPath;
    }

    Howdy,
    I decided to strip the effects from the thumbnails, so they
    all do show in their original full size. As a portrait
    photographer, my goal with using technology is to help me sell
    prints. Shrinking a portrait orientation photo down to fit in a
    square makes people look short and fat, and even if the large image
    is correct, people don't buy photos that make them look short and
    fat. Plus, it was also important to me to include the filename as a
    caption for the thumbnail. So that is a rather long explanation of
    how I got out of defining the sizes of the thumbnails.
    As for the large images, the code above is a replacement for
    the SetMainImage function in gallery.js. You'll also need to change
    the call to the function in ShowCurrentImage() from:
    SetMainImage("galleries/" +
    dsGalleries.getCurrentRow()["@base"] + "images/" + curRow["@path"],
    curRow["@width"], curRow["@height"], "tn" + curRow["ds_RowID"]);
    to:
    SetMainImage("galleries/" +
    dsGalleries.getCurrentRow()["@base"] + "images/" + curRow["@path"],
    "tn" + curRow["ds_RowID"]);
    Kin--You bring up some really good points. In my case, it
    would be too server intensive to calculate all the image sizes on
    the first load, as my server does not actually create the web
    images until they are requested--then they are stored in a cache on
    the server for future requests. So, I needed to do something that
    would not depend on knowing the size before loading the image.
    I totally understand why you did things the way you did. I
    think I might have to figure out a pre-loading strategy as you
    mention. Or, I may try some of the new spry effects to do something
    a bit different so the user sees some action immediately on click.
    That is probably pretty important, and I have not addressed it yet.
    Anyways, here is the link for my development site. I'll post
    here when it is done, because i'm not close to being done yet. The
    password for now is 'blue'
    http://www.mattjones.org/order_test/
    Peace,
    Matt

  • Photo gallery image size

    Hi. Is it possible to adjust the photo gallery module's code in a way that makes the image that gets displayed on selecting the thumbnail image display no larger than the browser? I have a client that's uploaded image that are pretty large and would prefer not to have to save them as smaller images if possible.
    Thanks
    Grant

    Are you by any chance saving as a JPEG or TIFF file?
    The image size that Photoshop displays is the uncompressed file size - if you save in a format such as JPEG the image is compressed, which will result in a smaller file size.
    Below is a comparison of the same image in Photoshop versus the compressed file saved to my computer:
    Here's a more technical explanation of what's going on: http://photo.stackexchange.com/questions/15184/why-does-photoshop-show-my-jpeg-files-unusu ally-large
    EDIT: If you want more accurate control over the image file size when saving, try going to File > Save for Web... You'll be able to choose your file format, and then see the resulting file size in the bottom left-hand corner of the window:
    I hope this helps!
    Cheers,
    Kendall

  • Web Flash Gallery: Problem setting Large Images size

    When using the Lightroom Flash Gallery I am not able to change the size of the Large Images (Web | Appearance | Large Images | Size). When I set the size to Medium or Small, the large images always ends up with the same size as when set to Large. Only when setting the size to Extra Large there is a slight change in size.
    How can I change the Large Images size to Medium and Small?
    Jørgen Johanson

    jools2005 wrote:
    Adobe please address this issue.
    This is a User to User forum not official Adobe support. Yes, Adobe staff may participate from time to time, but not often enough that you can depend on them reading your post. Therefore, I suggest that you support a bug report using the facilities provided at https://www.adobe.com/cfusion/mmform/index.cfm?name=wishform

  • How can I control the image size when I export form iphoto, the choice is too limited, I need to send a photo under 3 MB but if I choose high quaulity it is only 1.1 and i need to keep the best quaulity I can. Thanks for help.

    How can I control the image size when I export form iphoto, the choice is too limited, I need to send a photo under 3 MB but if I choose high quaulity it is only 1.1 and i need to keep the best quaulity I can. Thanks for help.

    Any image can only be as large as the Original. With a program like Photoshop you can UpRes an image and get it to a bigger size, larger files size as well, but the actual quality of the image will be degraded, depending on the UpRes system and the original quality of the image.
    iPhoto is not the program to be doing that in and I don't think it even has that option.
    So I suspect the image you are trying to send isn't much bigger than what you are getting. You can also try Exporting it from iPhoto to yopur desktop and see what size you end up with. If it is still that 209KB +/- file size then that is the size of the original image.

  • Does reducing image size reduce image quality?

    i 'm new to AI and also to this forum.
    I know that enlarging and image can reduce image quality.
    I'd like to know if reducing the image size (not in pixels, but in actual size),
    will reduce the quality?
    i have a Ai file that's 600x300, and need to reduce it to 300x120 my websie.
    Before I convert it to a web format, I want to reduce this large Ai file to 300x120.
    Will i still lose quality even if it's still an Ai file, before converting to web format???
    thanks!!!!!

    No it is however best to use save for the web to do so for the best optimization.
    keep in mind the only lose in quality will be if some one grabbed it off of the website and tried to enlarge it or view it at a larger display size.
    What you want to do is the best way of reducing the size.

  • Images NOT importing to iPhoto library, I only end up with thumbnails.

    I am importing images to my iPhoto 11 library, but I only end up with thumbnails. Originals are NOT importing as masters. In Advanced Preferences, I DO have 'Copy items to iPhoto Library' checked. I have tried importing jpg's from a folder and a DVD, and results are always the same - thumbnails only, no originals to be found.
    What am I doing wrong?

    I got the same problem, BUT it didn't worked on my iPhoto, i have also tried to rebuild it whit ¨iPhoto Library Manager¨ that didn't worked to.
    I have a iMac 21.5 ultimo 2013 2,9 GHz Intel Core i5, and i bought it from another guy, so i just wanted to start my ¨new¨ iMac on a fresh, didn't wanna use my backup file on my Time Machine, everything else (what i wanted to have on my iMac, like files, programs, musik) i have on my old MacBook is now on my iMac, except all my photo´s.
    I can't find a way to get it, only have thumbnail in iphoto, i can't get the masters to open up.
    Can you please help me??
    Regards Dennis Bille

  • Spry Photo Gallery Image Size via CSS

    Hello!
    I´ve been customizing the spry photo gallery for a couple of time, but got my little problem when viewing it on a mobile phone. When you load up the pictures with a size of 450 x 300 px for example, put up the right xml file with it´s width and height, so the gallery shows the pictures in that size. So what I want to do is that you can specify the image size with css depending on the device you´re watching the site with. There is div in the css called "mainImage" where the size is in %. When you change it to 75% for example. The pictures are correctly shown with 75% of it´s original size, but the outline (grey background) is still in 100%. When you make this grey background transparent it´s still there and moves the caption down. I guess there have to be done some changes within the SpryImageViewer.js, but I just know very little things about JavaScript. Do you have any clues how to change this to specify the image size via CSS?
    Thank you for your help!!!
    Kind regards,
    Joerg

    I see you are still using Spry 1.5. Have you considered upgrading to 
    Spry 1.6.1?
    Also your XML is broken, if you open up your xml in a normal standards 
    complaint browser such as firefox, you will see that it doesn't render
    a normal tree view as it would do with other xml files. So i suggest 
    checking those errors out.
    Its mainly because you  forgot to close your starting tag of the 
    gallerys node. (<gallery
    base = ""
    background = "#FFFFFF"
    banner = "#F0F0F0"
    text = "#000000"
    link = "#0000FF"
    alink = "#FF0000"
    vlink = "#800080"
    before your xml starts.

  • Incorrect image size and low quality file (Photoshop CC trial ver. on Macbook Pro Retina)

    At first, I set 500x500 size
    but in workplace, it show smaller than 500x500 (maybe 250x250?)
    I check on "image > image size" it still show me 500x500 pixels
    Save for web
    After that, i got a 500x500 file but It resize from smaller to 500x500 , so... i got a low quality file.
    what's wrong?
    (sorry for bad english skill but i really want your help)
    Ps. it also incorrect when i set resolution as 300dpi

    Pixel is not a measurement unit of length per se.
    If a screen has more pixels per unit of length an image (when displayed as one image pixel per one screen pixel) would appear smaller than on a screen with lower resolution.
    To make sure could you please post an image that is 500px x 500px (according to Image > Image Size) but seems to be too small to you?

  • In putting together a book I can move photos onto a page and enlarge the picture but is there a way to reduce the picture size? some cases I want a smaller picture and if I change the size of the picture box I only get a portion of the image. I wnt to red

    picture size...in putting together a book I can move photos onto a page and enlarge the picture but is there a way to reduce the picture size? some cases I want a smaller picture and if I change the size of the picture box I only get a portion of the image. I want to reduce the image to fit the size of the box.

    If you right click on the image on the page in the context menu select photo box alignment and then select one of scale to fit {centered, Left-aligned, Right-aligned}
    That should do what you are loking for.

  • Print multiples of the same image on one paper. I tried to change the layout to 9 per page, but it's only showing up and printing one per page, though it is the size i would like. But only one image is showing up as opposed to 9

    I'm trying to print multiples of the same image on one paper. I tried to change the layout to 9 per page, but it's only showing up and printing one per page, though it is the size i would like. But only one image is showing up as opposed to 9. HELP!!Version 7.0 (826.4)
    I'm using Preview Version 7

    Hello @kgingeri1, 
    Welcome to the HP forums.
    If you have sent a test print via ePrint, and experience this issue, i would call the Cloud Services department.
    If ePrint works fine, it is definitely a Google Cloud Print issue.
    Also, when you print from your android device, are you using Google Cloud print or the HP ePrint app?
    Please call our Cloud Services at 855-785-2777.
    If you live outside the US/Canada Region, please click the link below to get the support number for your region. http://www8.hp.com/us/en/contact-hp/ww-phone-assist.html
    Hours:
    Mon-Fri. 8am - 11pm, Sat. 9am-8pm - EST
    Mon-Fri. 7am - 10pm, Sat. 8am-7pm - CST
    Mon-Fri. 6am - 9pm, Sat. 7am-6pm - MST
    Mon-Fri. 5am - 8pm, Sat. 6am-5pm - PST
    Aardvark1
    I work on behalf of HP
    Please click “Accept as Solution ” if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
    Click the “Kudos Thumbs Up" on the right to say “Thanks” for helping!

  • Optimize JPG image size reduction by reduced compression quality vs. reduced pixels?

    I have many images of slides scanned at high res (4800 DPI, maximum pixels 5214x3592).   Although I will be saving these as lossless TIFs, I also wish to make JPGs from them that I wish to be just less than 5 MB in file size.  Aside from cropping, I know I can achieve such a reduction of JPG file size by a combination of saving to lower quality JPG compression or reducing image size.  My question is, what is theoretically or practically better, achieving this mostly by reducing image total pixels or by reducing  JPG compression quality.  Thank you

    Thank you Doug.  The comments on extensive uniform blue sky vs. marked variation in color seem well taken, I'll keep this method of choosing in mind.  My goal is to create a JPG family photo archive of the highest quality images that I can make for future use by non-technical descendants (thus it will supplement the TIF archive that holds the best quality versions of the same images but that may not be usable to novices).  As I cannot anticipate exactly how the JPGs will be used, I just want them to be the best possible, while still being of a size that can be uploaded to, say, Costco (5 MB size limit) for making enlargements. 
    In general, I am often left curious as to how exactly Photoshop carries out its algorithms and how different factors influence the outcome.  So often, one read "just try different techniques and see what looks the best".  But I am always left wondering, what is the theory behind this and has it been systematically studied and worked out and published.  In so many disciplines, such as medicine, the methods of optimization has been evaluated, systematized, and fully described.  I have not yet explored what may be found in technical journals, but I'm sure much of this good stuff must be available somewhere. It would be nice to have a "How Things Work" that actually explains what Photoshop is doing under the hood.
    Thanks again.

Maybe you are looking for