Image Software on nVidia RAID arrays

Has anyone been able to get a disk imaging program to work with the nVidia RAID array?  I have tried Acronis True Image, Norton Ghost 9.0 and the old Drive Image. I have been unable get the rescue/recovery disks to recognize the RAID Array. With Acronis, it appears that they don't have the Linux drivers for the RAID array.  Ghost 9.0 is supposed to support RAID arrays, but when I try to load the drivers, I get a message that it can't find nvraid.sys, despite the fact that I supply that file on the floppy disk. I spent 1.5 hours on the phone with Symantec Technical Support and their only answer was that I would receive a phone call from a supervisor in 3 days.  
I can get Norton Ghost to work from within windows, but in order to restore an image of my C: drive I need to gain access to the RAID array from the recovery disk.

I have sort of got it to work with ghost9 .
I have written a plug-in for nvraid/nvide for the bartWinPE cd made with PEBuilder 3032.
V2I Images can then be browsed with imagebrowser and files/catalogs be restored
to arrays partitions .
The thing that does not yet work properly is the V2I protector executable cause the bart plug-in for .Net gives problems .(not sorted out this yet)
The BartWinPE cd is also of course equipped with ghost9 plugin .
So basicly the PC is booted with bootable Windows PE cd (like the ghost9 CD) ,
windows runs from cd&ram . And all the nvraid arrays is visible .Restoration made
with V2I image browser .
The plug-in ( INF file ) :
Code: [Select]
; PE Builder v3 plug-in INF file
; NVIDIA RAID (Windows XP)
; Created by Syar2003
[Version]
Signature= "$Windows NT$"
[PEBuilder]
Name="DSK_NvRaid"
Enable=1
[SourceDisksFiles]
nvraid.sys=4,,1
nvatabus.sys=4,,1
[SetValue]
"txtsetup.sif","SourceDisksFiles","nvraid.sys", "1,,,,,,_x,4,1,0,0"
"txtsetup.sif","SourceDisksFiles","NvAtaBus.sys", "1,,,,,,_x,4,1,0,0"
"txtsetup.sif","SCSI.Load","nvatabus", "nvatabus.sys,4"
"txtsetup.sif","SCSI.Load","nvraid", "nvraid.sys,4"
"txtsetup.sif","SCSI","nvatabus", """NVIDIA NForce Storage Controller"""
"txtsetup.sif","SCSI","nvraid", """NVIDIA RAID CLASS DRIVER"""
"txtsetup.sif","HardwareIdsDatabase","PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_008E", """nvatabus"""
"txtsetup.sif","HardwareIdsDatabase","PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_0085", """nvatabus"""
"txtsetup.sif","HardwareIdsDatabase","PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_00D5", """nvatabus"""
"txtsetup.sif","HardwareIdsDatabase","PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_00EE", """nvatabus"""
"txtsetup.sif","HardwareIdsDatabase","PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_00E3", """nvatabus"""
"txtsetup.sif","HardwareIdsDatabase","PCI\VEN_10DE&DEV_00E5", """nvatabus"""
"txtsetup.sif","HardwareIdsDatabase","*_NVRAIDBUS", """nvraid"""
"txtsetup.sif","HardwareIdsDatabase","GenNvRaidDisk", """nvraid"""
If the BartWinPE cd is equipped with ghost8 you should be able to restore
full disks/partitions with the *.gho extension .
But then the images must be buildt with ghost8 (from the BartWinPE cd first).
Though i have not had the time to test that yet .
Links:
Plug-in repository
http://www.reatogo.de/BartPE/BartPE_plugins/repository.htm
PeBuilder
http://www.nu2.nu/pebuilder/

Similar Messages

  • Windows Vista + nVidia i680 MB + RAID5 + iTunes 7.3.2 = RAID array trouble

    Dunno if any of you can help out with this but I'm at witt's end over this issue.
    I have a Windows Vista box running an Abit In9-32MAX motherboard (nVidia i680 chipset), four drives in a RAID 5 array and using iTunes 7.3.2
    Drivers for the motherboard are the most recent ones from the nVidia site. BIOS for motherboard is also current.
    Practically ANY time I import any audio or video file over 50 MB into iTunes the entire RAID array will degrade. I'm also having issues transcoding video into Quicktime using Videora which seems to be related to this issue. The video simply refuses to play.
    For what it's worth the video/audio content is legit. I own the DVD's that I'm transcoding so I can watch them when I travel.
    Any thoughts, ideas, suggestions, etc appreciated. I'd love to go a whole week without iTunes/Quicktime forcing me to rebuild the RAID array.

    Well, whatever Itunes/quicktime does, it's definitely causing some sort of RAID compatibility. I've had this problem since I got my new rig a month ago. Nvidia 680i SLI board with a RAID 1, and I have it working fine (I've done 3 system restores now) and then I install itunes, and kablooie, there goes the RAID. I can also tell you that even if you disable the mediashield program (NVRAID.exe), it will still happen (this was my last experiment in trying to make it work) and the raid will show up degraded in the BIOS.
    Basically, Apple and Nvidia need to exchange a freaking phone call and try and figure out what is causing it to go bad. from reading around, it's not just apple (though they are the biggest culprit). I've seen people mention bittorrent and some other program whose name escapes me at the moment cause this as well (digital imaging program I think).

  • SATA RAID 0 and Drive Imaging Software

    I recently bought True Image 8.0 and it hangs during image restore.  The Acronis forums indicate that many people have had problems using True Image with the promise 378 SATA controllers.  I have a few of questions:
    1. Is anyone using True Image successfully in combination with the Promise 378 SATA controllers?  If so, what version?
    2. With the VIA controllers?  If so, what version?
    3. Are there other drive imaging Software (Norton Ghost, Drive Image, etc.) that are known to work with SATA RAID 0 & the  Promise 378 controller?

    Ghost 2004 working on VIA SATA here..
    ...although the mobo is a POS and I'm RMAing it that much DOES work. heh
    Ian

  • Unable to add partition on raid array, device or resource busy.

    Greetings,
    I want to be able to create a disk image of a software raid of one of my arch box.
    I'm able to create my image with G4U successfully. I'm also able to restore my image without error on my new box.
    When my system boot up, I make sure that my raid array are up by doing cat /proc/mdstat.
    I can see that md1 and md2 are 2 of 2 and active raid 1. But, when I look at md0 this is what I got:
    md0 : active raid1 sdb3[1]
               6289344 blocks [2/1] [_/U]
    I try to add the partition sda3 to md0 array with this command:
    mdadm --manage /dev/md0 --add /dev/sda3
    The output of this command give me this :
    mdadm: Cannot open /dev/sda3: Device or resource busy.
    It seems that this error only occurs on /dev/md0 (/) array. I'm 100% sure that both, my image and my drive (vmware hdd) are good.
    This is my partition table:
    /dev/sda1 /dev/sdb1 = /boot (md1) 100MB
    /dev/sda2 /dev/sdb2 = swap (md2) 2048MB
    /dev/sda3 /dev/sdb3 = / (md0) 8GB
    I have also tried the image creation with Acronis... same error.

    I solved my issue.
    My menu.lst was wrong..
    kernel /kernel26 root=/dev/md0 ro
    I should add this to my menu.lst:
    kernel /kernel26 root=/dev/md0 ro  md=0,/dev/sda3,/dev/sdb3
    Now it work.
    I followed the archlinux raid guide who's telling this:
    Nowadays (2009.02), with the mdadm hook in the initrd it it no longer necessary to add kernel parameters concerning the RAID array(s).
    Which is wrong because my distro is 2009.02, if someone can add a note to the wiki it can be usefull.
    Thanks for your support

  • K8N DIAMOND: New Raid array and old HD... I'm going crazy!!! Please

    Hi guys
    First, sorry for my poor english...
    My problem is:
    I bought two Raptor 36 Gb for my new raid array.
    I have my old HD Hitachi 250 Gb connected on sata 1.
    I connected my two raptor, on sata 3 and 4, I enabled all sata port and raid config for ports 3 and 4.
    I restart PC, typed F10 and set a stripe array with two raptor. All run ok...
    Restarted and boot with my copy of WinXP with SP2 and NF4 raid drivers.
    Installation found my array and my Hitachi;
    Hitachi with 4 partitions; C (os), D (driver), E (films), F (music)
    I create one partitions on my raid array, and it takes I: letter... So I formatted and start to copy os...
    Errors occurs when, restarting pc and resetting the boot to Hard disk (the order of booting is 1 - nvidia array, 2 - hitachi 250 gb), just before loading installation, It shows a black screen with an error: "there is an error in your hard disk bla bla bla.. try to control your connection or connect to windows help....bla bla..."
    The Raid array works properly, infact I try to disconnect my Hitachi from sata port 1 and all installation works (I'm writing from Win xp on the raid array).
    I tried to connect the hitachi on port 1 of silicon image controller.... same error..!!
    I'm desperate... I have all my life on my hitachi...
    I think that there's  a sort of conflict in drive letter assignement... I cant find a solution ..
    PLEASE HELP ME!!!

    Glad it worked, I had a feeling it would. 
    Quote
    One question for you.. on G: partition, there's a directory called "Windows", do you suggest me to format this partition??
    You can format it if you want to free up space, but unless you moved things around the My documents folder and everything in it is on that partition, along with anything you might of had on the old desktop during that Windows install.  You might have something you want there, I usually leave mine for a few month, and figure out if I have everything I need.
    Quote
    What I  have to do, if I need to reinstall WIn XP on first partition of raptor array??
    Things should be fine now as Windows marked the Hitachi drive as G. You should be able to reinstall without issue. But if you have a lot of sensitive info on the Hitachi, I would always disconnect the Hitachi if doing a fresh install.  Once windows is done installing, hook it back up.  But next time you shouldn't have to reconfigure NVRAID after disconnecting and reconnecting.
     

  • Can't create raid array in 10.4.6

    I am trying to create a mirrored raid array with two Fantom USB 2 external harddrives using disk utility.
    I am unable to drag the image of any hard drive into the right window and the create button is never activated.
    I have restarted, verified the disks and so on. I hve tried to select a different external disk but that won't work either.
    Any ideas what's up.

    You can try updating the drivers from the makers site, but it could be that Apple won't allow USB drives to RAIDed.
    Unless your recording ET or something where a hard drive failure could mean disaster, mirrors are not ideal form of backup.
    Consider auto-cloning and auto-backup software like DeJaVu or Retrospect.
    What this will do is give you the benefit of time, cloning will "clone" a whole boot drive and make it bootable in case you need it. (You can clone a whole non-boot drive as well.) Auto-backup will copy user type files and folders, but it's not designed to copy a OS from one drive to another.
    http://www.apple.com/downloads/macosx/systemdiskutilities/dejavu.html

  • Why is my new 10TB Mirrored RAID array only showing 1.8TB total space?

    I have 5ea. 2TB Western Digital hard drives in a FirmTek 5PM enclosure connected via eSATA to my Mac Pro (April 2007 model). Running Leopard 10.5.8.
    I used Apple Disk Utility to set up a Mirrored Raid using MacOS Extended (Journaled) and have a check mark by "Automatically Rebuild Raid Mirror Sets." My Raid Block size is 128K.
    So, by all accounts I should have more than the 1.8TB showing as available space on this array.
    Here is how it looks in my Disk Utillity app (link to smug pic of Disk Uility window): http://richardbrackin.smugmug.com/Other/blogpics/RAID/754262625_iffPY-S.jpg
    I found a site here: http://blog.scottmroberts.com/archives/15 that discusses removing a GPT header but that doesn't sound like a good idea.
    How do I get more capacity? I have clearly done something wrong.

    Oh, you have mirrored one drive with 4 others creating a single 2 TB array consisting of one main member and four mirrors. I doubt this is your intended result. If you want a 10 TB RAID, then you want a "striped" not a "mirrored" RAID.
    Now, you can make a striped RAID of one pair of drives, another striped RAID with another pair, then create a mirrored RAID of the two RAIDs. This would give you a 4 TB mirrored array. But the only way to use all five drives in a single array is a 5 drive striped RAID. To learn more about RAIDs see:
    RAID Basics
    For basic definitions and discussion of what a RAID is and the different types of RAIDs see RAIDs. Additional discussions plus advantages and disadvantages of RAIDs and different RAID arrays see:
    RAID Tutorial;
    RAID Array and Server: Hardware and Service Comparison>.
    Hardware or Software RAID?
    RAID Hardware Vs RAID Software - What is your best option?
    RAID is a method of combining multiple disk drives into a single entity in order to improve the overall performance and reliability of your system. The different options for combining the disks are referred to as RAID levels. There are several different levels of RAID available depending on the needs of your system. One of the options available to you is whether you should use a Hardware RAID solution or a Software RAID solution.
    RAID Hardware is always a disk controller to which you can cable up the disk drives. RAID Software is a set of kernel modules coupled together with management utilities that implement RAID in Software and require no additional hardware.
    Pros and cons
    Software RAID is more flexible than Hardware RAID. Software RAID is also considerably less expensive. On the other hand, a Software RAID system requires more CPU cycles and power to run well than a comparable Hardware RAID System. Also, because Software RAID operates on a partition by partition basis where a number of individual disk partitions are grouped together as opposed to Hardware RAID systems which generally group together entire disk drives, Software RAID tends be slightly more complicated to run. This is because it has more available configurations and options. An added benefit to the slightly more expensive Hardware RAID solution is that many Hardware RAID systems incorporate features that are specialized for optimizing the performance of your system.
    For more detailed information on the differences between Software RAID and Hardware RAID you may want to read: Hardware RAID vs. Software RAID: Which Implementation is Best for my Application?
    Actually as I squinted at your tiny image I'm sure you never actually created a RAID. You have one 2 TB drives that are not properly arrayed with any of the other four drives.
    Message was edited by: Kappy

  • Diamond Plus Nvidia RAID problem

    Hello. I was able to set up nvidia raid in the BIOS and XP accepted the 2 drivers (F6) during install. However, when it gets to the point of formatting the array, Windows says it can't format the drive(s), "...maybe broken, etc." So, I tried the onboard Silicon Image raid and that worked fine. Windows installed without a problem. The only thing that bothered me was that HD Tach showed Burst Speed for the array as disappointingly slow. Actually, a few ticks less than the single ATA 150 drive they use for comparison. Every report I've seen with the Hitachi drives in raid 0 has them bursting above 300 mbs. But, the average read was an acceptable 97 mbs.
    So, I got rid of the raid array and installed Windows on a single drive. Burst speed is 221 (a lot higher than with the SI RAID), but average read, naturally, is much less at around 47.
    Questions: 1) Any suggestions on the problem I'm having with Nvidia Raid? I'd give it another try if there is a solution.
    2) Is RAID 0 really worth it? I'm mainly interested in gaming and everything I've read says there is no real world difference playing games with Raid 0.
    BTW, the system is very stable either way (Raid/Single Drive). Prime 95 & memtest, no errors after 4/6 hours.   

    Quote
    Do I also need to load the SATA IDE driver after/before the 2 Raid drivers?
    Both drivers need to be loaded for OS to se the array as one disk . You must do this with nvidia SATA raid .
    Use the "S" a second time and load the second driver during the F6 install .

  • Is It Possible to Clone RAID Array in a Safe and Easy Way?

    Why do computer users need to clone RAID array, especially Windows Server users need to do RAID cloning? Generally speaking, they need to clone RAID array regularly in order to upgrade disk or migrate data from small disk to a larger one. A typical
    example is that when the partitions on the hardware RAID runs out of space, you may prefer to rebuild the hardware RAID with larger hard disks. Then, you need to backup the data to another place, rebuild the hardware RAID and restore data again.
    What a time-consuming task!
    Is it possible to clone RAID array in a safe and easy way? The answer is yes and this article will introduce a RAID cloning software.

    Hi jiangchunli,
    Were you looking to post this question in some other forum? This looks like related to RAID and Disk upgrades.
    This forum is meant for
    http://www.windowsazure.com/en-us/services/recovery-manager/
    Please let us know if this is indeed Hyper-V Recovery Manager related so we can help better.
    Thanks
    Praveen
    Praveen/ www.PraveenKumar.in

  • Raid array being seen as 2 individual drives

    Hi. Here is the issue as posted in other places. Still searching for the answer to this one.
    Specs:
    K7n2 delta2 platinum with b50 bios
    2x1gb crucial pc3200 2.5cas ram
    AMD Barton 2500
    2 x 160gb 7200rpm 8mb cache SATA Samsung Hdd's
    Thermaltake 430w psu
    Gainward fx5700 ultra graphics
    OS's: original xp corp, slipstreamed xp corp sp2
    raid drivers: nvraid.sys v4.27, 5.10, 5.11 (also the needed nvatabus.sys with those)
    I am NOT overclocked.
    fsb 166
    1:1 ram/cpu
    no spread spectrum or other garbage
    ddr400 patch disabled
    PSU gives presumably stable reading (according to what I see), with amperage ratings above the required.
    checked and rechecked cables for bad ones
    ran mulitple scans on drives, all come up drives OK
    I HAVE installed into Raid 0 already, this is not an issue of hardware failure as far as I am concerned.
    So here is the scenario
    I have properly set up the array, using correct bios settings and the raid setup utility, for a raid 0 array of those 2 hdd's listed. When booting into xp, either version, I have used all 3 of the driver sets listed. I have been reinstalling to do some performance tests on different configurations.
    Anyway, for the last few nights I have been trying to get the windows setup to see the raid 0 array as one 300gb drive. It does not, no matter what I try. It sees them as 2 drives, each being 160gb (or thereabouts). These drives are matched, same firmware, same lot, so that should not be an issue.
    I have used numberous tools to delete the mbr on the drives, both in an array and as single drives. I have done the same as well as tried an install and formatted each drive individually, still the same effect when the raid array is recreated.
    Basically, I can find no good reason why the array is seen as individuals and not as an array. It is interesting to note, that even though xp setup sees the the array as 2 drives, I can complete the text based portion of setup. However, rebooting to start the GUI portion of setup, it will not boot. Obviously becuase the bios has the controller as the nvraid controller and it is supposed to be a raid 0 array, so I expected that.
    Short of rewriting the mbr, either by deleting it or by changing each drive by formatting/partitioning/installing an OS on them, I cannot think of how to fix this. I know the drives and xp cd's work because I have already installed with them.
    I understand what to do in the bios portion, and in the raid setup utility portion. I know that I can boot into windows as a single drive and use the nvraid tool to set it up, but that is not the way it should be, and that is not the way I am going to learn WHY this is happening.
    Roger that. First set in bios enable raid (in this bios I have to enable IDE array, then choose which controller to actually enable raid on, which happens to have been SATA 1 & 2).
    Second, upon reboot, I use the F10 key to enter raid utility. Then, set to striping, set stripe size (which was one of the things I am testing), and add the drives to the array. Next step is to create it. It asks to clear disc data, and it is done.
    Have deleted that array as well as just cleared it. Have deleted it and reboot and rebuild it. Have deleted it, reboot, change bios back to non-raid, reboot. Reboot. Change bios back to raid enabled. Reboot. Rebuild array in raid utility, reboot. Run setup, only see 2 hdd's, not one array.
    Umm, yep, that is about it.
    More to the story now.
    From some other posts I tried this.
    1. destroy array. reboot. disable raid in bios. reboot. verify sata's visible as singles in bios.
    2. power down. pull plugs on sata's. reboot. no drives visible.
    3. pull power. jumper clear cmos. wait 60 seconds. re-pin jumper. power up.
    4. verify no drives. verify default bios settings. all is good
    5. plug drives in. reboot. seen as singles. erase mbr on both drives. reboot
    6. enable raid in bios, and choose sata 1 & 2 as "enabled". reboot.
    7. use F10 key to setup raid. Here is the interesting part. Even though I deleted the array prior to all of this, and removed the drives to force an ESCD update, and cleard the cmos with the board jumper, and then before raid was enabled, cleared the mbr on the drives, when I started the raid utility, the array was already set up. That is the problem, whatever that is. I have read snippets where it is claimed that this chip or bios or whatever stores some kind of a table on this stuff, but this is a bit out of hand.
    That combination, IMO, should have cleared anything out. But, the saga continues.
    Thanks for you help BWM
    [Edit] BTW, I have finally found a utility that will see a raid array and allow me to clear the arrays mbr. It is called SuperFdisk and is at ptdd.com. So far the only one that see's the 2 drives as 1.
    Yeppers.
    Started with v5.10 which came on a floppy with the mobo. Told setup to use both, nvatabus.sys and nvraid.sys. Even switched which one of the 2 I picked first, just to see.
    Same thing with v4.27 and v5.11. Also tried it with just the nvraid.sys and just the nvatabus.sys (which obviously does squat for raid, lol)
    Trying some new things now. Post in a little bit.
    I am officially at 'Wit's End'.
    Here is what I have tried now.
    1.pull drive cables. pull power. jumper clear cmos. wait. power up. no drives
    2.plug sata 1 in. boot. drive detected.
    3.boot to command.com, run MHDD, which is a nice russian utility similar to Spinrite. Used this to clear the mbr at hardware level, and do a complete erase.
    4. reboot to command.com. run superfdisk. erase mbr.
    5. pull plug on sata 1, and plug in sata 2 with sata 1 cable. repeat the erasure steps listed above.
    6. pull plug on sata 2, no sata plugged in. reboot
    7. change bios to raid enable on sata 1 & 2. power down
    8. plug in sata 1 & 2. power up.
    9. inspect raid utility. no listing of any arrays. reboot
    10. in raid utility, build array. did NOT clear discs. reboot
    11. attempt install. single drives found again (used both drivers).reboot
    12. in raid utility, optioned to CLEAR discs (funny, rebuild option is never valid).reboot
    13. attempt install, both drivers, still seen as 2 individuals.
    Things to note. When creating an array when presumably there are none, it assigns the raid array an ID of 2. Upon reboot, the ID is now 1. Don't know what difference that makes.
    Also, tried the install listed above with APIC functionality both off and on. Also, when on, set MPS to both 1.1 and 1.4. In addition to this, each variant I tried manual HAL layers of, in this order, ACPI (the one that actually spells ACPI out), ACPI Uniprocessor, MPS Uniprocessor, and let it choose it for me.
    So, here I sit in a barca-lounger at 'Wit's End', with a warm cup of java and a dinner mint.

    Here is the final product on the floppy disk that I used to  successfully install a stable raid 0 on the MSI K7N2 Delta 2 Ultra 400  Platinum ms-6570e motherboard.
    On root of floppy, from driverset 6.70. (after much testing, I used  driver pack 5.10 for my nic and smbus. I used the realtek sound  drivers off the cd for audio. I have used every driver pack I could  find, and while some did offer better I/O or read/write latency, this  set in general provided the most stable environment. The only drivers  I used were these floppy drivers for SATA, the nic and smbus just  mentioned, the sound just mentioned, and updating the nvide drivers to  mside drivers)
    <from sataraid directory>
    disk1
    idecoi.dll
    nvatabus.sys
    nvraid.cat
    nvraid.inf
    nvraid.sys
    nvraidco.dll
    <from legacy directory>
    nvata.cat
    nvatabus.inf
    I used the txtsetup.oem from the sataraid directory, but edited this:
    [Files.scsi.RAIDCLASS]
    driver  = d1,nvraid.sys,RAIDCLASS
    inf     = d1,nvraid.inf
    dll     = d1,nvraidco.dll
    catalog = d1,nvraid.cat
    [Files.scsi.BUSDRV]
    driver = d1,nvatabus.sys,BUSDRV
    inf    = d1, nvraid.inf
    dll    = d1,idecoi.dll
    catalog = d1, nvraid.cat
    To this:
    [Files.scsi.RAIDCLASS]
    driver  = d1,nvraid.sys,RAIDCLASS
    inf     = d1,nvraid.inf
    dll     = d1,nvraidco.dll
    catalog = d1,nvata.cat
    [Files.scsi.BUSDRV]
    driver = d1,nvatabus.sys,BUSDRV
    inf    = d1, nvatabus.inf
    dll    = d1,idecoi.dll
    catalog = d1, nvata.cat
    Now, it is important to note that I installed or attempted to install  at least 50 times. Bare minimum. I noticed when I use this custom  driver disc that in the GUI portion of setup, XP asks me for files  from the disc. I tried lot's of different things to alleviate this,  and denied some of them.
    One thing that really bugged me was that the bios would see my #2  optical, slave on secondary IDE channel. A dvd/rw drive. And I could  even start the setup from it. But, once I got about 3/4 through copy  file stage on text setup portion, I would hang. Becuase the drive was  no longer accessible. Booting from the master would get me to the  desktop, but the slave optical was nowhere to be found. Updating the  ATA/IDE controller to the ms ide drivers would get it visible, but I  kept having issues with stability after I did that.
    The most stable method I found was to use my above listing of driver  files for the floppy, and when in GUI mode setup asks about NVCOI.DLL,  I skipped it, ignored it, and did not let setup install it. That  actually got me to the desktop, with access to the slave optical as a  "removable drive". It even knew what the hardware was. It just could  not access it. On a reboot however, back to not seeing it. This method  however did allow me to update the nvide driver with the mside driver  with no stability issues. So, for me it was a raving success.
    Here are some links regarding the SATA RAID driver workaround:
    http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:jHbX5bNfGx4J:www.msfn.org/board/lofiversion/index.php/t51140.html+nforce2+nvraid.sys+ms+ide&hl=en&client=opera
    http://www.aoaforums.com/frontpage/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=292&Itemid
    http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:J9UhG2Kd8W4J:www.short-media.com/forum/showthread.php%3Ft%3D32751+xp+2+sata+raid+0+seen+as+individual&hl=en&client=opera
    Early on one problem I noticed was that in text setup mode of xp  installation, there were long pauses that I have never seen before. I  noticed that with both ide and sata installs. Also I noticed that when  booting there was a really long pause when the xp logo is first seen  in a sort of dim state till when it became bright and vivid.
    Come to find out that this is a more or less typical scenario. Most  instances that I read about were all pointing to the nvide driver. So,  I found if I just updated the PATA controller to the standard ms ide  driver, that went away and the whole system ran better.
    It took awhile to figure out that if you install a driver with the  nForce2 chip, you had to uninstall it or you will have issues. Herein  was the main problem I encountered with the SATA RAID installs. The  nvatabus.sys driver was required for an SATA RAID install. Omitting  the ata driver was impossible. And for awhile I had no success  updating the ms ide driver once I was to the desktop without major  instability. Here are some links regarding the drivers for this  chipset:
    http://www.nforcershq.com/forum/latest-drivers-for-nforce-3-vt60240.html
    In my browsing I came across some pretty interesting articles  regarding ACPI. One thing I started playing with was the different HAL  layers that xp installs on it's own, vs. me picking one manually (F5  key). I must have started the setup at least 50 times to figure out  this: that this particular board does not give me the bios settings to  install xp with anything but the ACPI Uniprocessor Hal. For instance,  the MPS Uniprocessor HAL is much more responsive, but it lacks the  IRQ's needed for setup to see the raid array. I booted to each one,  some locking the system up, some booting OK. The one I found the best  performance with early on was the one that spells out ACPI, not just  initialized. (sorry, I don't want to look it up).
    I seemed to be getting closer, but I could not find the needed bios  settings to properly manage my ACPI, and since I was trying for RAID,  I could not use the one that did work. Here is a link for that kind of  stuff.
    http://www.fceduc.umu.se/~jesruv98/info/acpi/acpi.html
    Another thing that I did not like was being forced to use the dynamic  overclocking feature of this board. I have a 333mhz barton core, and I  have ddr400 ram. In optimized (fool proof) mode in bios, I was running  asynchronous. I did not want that. So I set it down to run at 166mhz,  with very slow and conservative settings on everything. Unfortunately,  if I did this "manual" method, I was forced to use the dynamic  overclocking. I thought I had that figured out. So I set everything to  "optimized". But, as it turns out, the system had terrible stability  without the dynamic overclocking set to at least Private. What this  meant is that I could not rule out that my stability issues  (corruptions and hangs and bsod) were from being overclocked even a  tiny bit or not. And as if that were not enough, this bios has a  special set of settings you must unlock to see. And one of those is  paramount in achieving a stable system. It is called the DDR400 patch,  and it is enabled by default. So, by pressing SHIFT+f2 AND CTRL+F3,  these settings are now available. Like I said, I had to disable that  DDR400 patch setting.
    I also found out from the first day that my board shipped with the  latest bios. I flashed the 2 prior versions with no success in more  stability. After about 6 weeks of getting whipped on by this board, I  found mention of some modded bios's for this board. I have used modded  bios's in the past, some worked wonders, others required some serious  effort to recover from. What I found out about this board is that  there are 2 players who make the modded bios's. Here is the first  index I found from a german website. This one actually is for the  older B4 version only for the Platinum.
    http://storage-raid-forum.de/viewtopic.php?t=2824
    And here is an english forum for pretty much the same thing
    http://www.nforcershq.com/forum/bios-mods-for-k7n-and-k8-boards-vt55014.html
    These links have a bit more information, and I decided to go with  these. I tried versions b61,b62 and b71. I found b71 to work the best  for me. Mind you I am not into overclocking or what-have-you. Just a  rig that performs as well as it was advertised to do. Try these out  for the bios information:
    http://forums.pcper.com/showthread.php?t=385480
    https://forum-en.msi.com/index.php?topic=84715.0B62
    Here is a page that had a bunch of misc stuff I found interesting:
    http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:QkvLeKcbwjQJ:www.amdzone.com/modules.php%3Fop%3Dmodload%26name%3DPNphpBB2%26file%3Dviewtopic%26p%3D75383+nforce2+ultra+nvraid+driver+freeze&hl=en&client=opera
    In the end, I have, I think, conquered this board. My findings can be  summed up as follows, all in my opion only I guess.
    1. There are some ACPI/APIC issues with this board or this chipset. I  believe it also included drivers and some can be attributed to XP.
    2. There are some major bios issues with this board.
    3. There are some major driver issues concerning SATA/RAID. I am not  sure who get's the boob prize, nVidia or MSI.
    The only way I have found to get RAID 0 installed and stable is to  modify my bios (which is a modded beta version), modify my driver disk  for SATA/RAID, modify my install sequence for those drivers, modify my  drivers within windows after setup, use different drivers from  different driver packs for different pieces of hardware, and modify my  HAL layer after everything else is done, to achieve peak performance.
    If I had not spent soooo much time trying to get a stable install, I  would have built up an Unattended CD, which has some possibilities for  forcing non WHQL drivers. But, hey man, I am totally burn out on this  board. And all it was for is a spare LAN box for when I go to a  lanparty. Sheesh. Murphy's law.
    Oh, and I also found out, with my own eyes, that the Soyo KT600  Dragon+ that I dumped for this wonderful board, is way faster. Faster  read/writes, faster throughput on the nic, faster booting, much faster  installs of xp. As a matter of fact, I could get my KT600 to get a  consistent thruput on the network to my older KT266a board at 99%.  That is pretty fast. 2 of these Platinum boards, on a sweet switch  that is tweaked, will only go up to 91%, no matter how much I tweak  them. The gigabit connects via a crossover cable at about 38% of full  bore. This is tweaked stuff, but still. I listened to the hype. Dual  channel memory, giglan, etc etc.
    I hope this may help anyone else out there who is still fighting with  these issues.
    Out.
    sul

  • RAID Arrays and WinXP Home

    OK... I tried upgrading to Win XP 64-bit, but found there were games and applications that were screwy there and some items without 64-bit drivers, etc.  So, I rolled back to a clean install of XP Home (32-bit).
    After much effort, I was told today at a local techie-store that XP Home "doesn't allow for RAID arrays."
    True?
    I have 2 Hitachi 160GB drives I got last week at the afore-mentioned store for $112 US total!  So, I am trying to make it all work, but am having no luck.
    Any thoughts?
    Scott in Los Angeles

    There is a way to make some versions of windows do a software RAID, but the MSI board has a VIA and a Promise hardware array. Don't worry about what the 'techie' said.
    Enable Promise controller in BIOS and set it for RAID.
    Press Ctrl & F when prompted to set up your RAID array.
    Boot to Windows CD
    Press F6 when prompted and insert your Promise RAID disk.
    Enjoy!

  • NVidia RAID using existing drives?

    Hi folks --
    Just installed WinXP x64 (build 1218). I've been using an Adaptec 1200A RAID controller with 2 200GB Maxtor PATA133 drives in a RAID1 config.
    Unfortunately, there seems to be no 64-bit driver available for that controller card (I've checked Adaptec, planetAMD64, various other places). So the question is: can I set up these drives as RAID1 on the nVidia built-in controller without losing data? These are not bootable drives -- storage only.
    The MSI mobo booklet explains a "Rebuild Array" option, where if one of the drives in the array fails, the data on the remaining drive can be mirrored to a new one. Will that work if the source drive was not part of an nVidia array to start with?
    I can't afford to lose that data, and I have no place to back it up (without buying another drive). So don't even wanna risk it without some guidance!
    One possible complication: the system also includes a Promise Tx ATA133 controller, which is controlling the boot drive (Win64 included a 64-bit driver for this). There is no conflict under Win2k, however.
    Anyone have some savvy on this? Or know where to get a 64-bit controller for the Adaptec card?
    Thanks!
    SYSTEM:
    MSI K8N Neo2 Platinum
    AMD64 3500+
    1 GB Crucial PC3200 DDR
    Dual boot: Win2k, WinXPx64
    Promise Tx ATA133 IDE controller
    ATI 9800 XT
    Soundblaster Audigy2
    PS: All the rest of this system is working fine, so if anyone is having probs with a similar setup, I'd be happy to help.

    Earlier posts on this site,  may be in the sata/raid  sticky , that the only time a raid can be remade is when using the same controller. Doubt very much that Adaptec & Nvidia raid components are interchangable
     i know to my cost on previous rigs that even changing a raid driver has caused the loss of data.
    creating a new raid destroys any data on the target drives.
    rebuild only applies to drives in an existing array created  i would guess with the same controller.
    Chances also are that any 64 adaptec drivers will only be beta and your raid may be at risk changing to these from existing drivers.
    my advise has to be if u cant back it up dont do it  

  • I would like to migrate from Aperture. What happens to my Masters which are on a RAID array and then what do I do with my Vault which is on a separate Drive please ?

    I am sorry, but I do noisy understand what happens to my RAW original Master files, which I keep offline on a RAID array and then what I do with my Vault which as all my edited photos ? Sorry for such a simple question, but would someone please help my lift the fog ?
    Thanks,
    Rob

    Dear John ,
    Apologies, as I am attempting to get to the bottom of this migration for my wife ( who is away on assignment ) and I am not 100% certain on the technical aspects of Aperture, so excuse my ignorance.
    She has about 6TB worth of RAW Master images ( several 100 thousand ) which, as explained, are on an external RAID drive. She uses a separate Drive as a Vault . Can I assume that this Vault contains all of her edits, file structures , Metadata, etc ?
    So, step by step........She can Import into Lightroom her Referenced Masters from her RAID and still keep them there ? Is that correct ?
    The Managed Files that are backed up by her Vault , are in the pictures folder of her MacPro, but not in a structure that looks like her Aperture library ? This means Lightroom will just organize all the Managed files, simply by the date in the Metadata ? Am I correct ( Sorry for being so tech illiterate ).
    How do I ensure she imports into Lighgtroom in exactly the same format as she runs her workflow in Aperture ?  ( Projects, that are organized by year and shoot location and Albums within those projects with sub-locations, or species , etc ). What exactly do I need to do in Aperture please to organize Managed Files to create a mirror structure of Aperture on my internal Hard Drive ?
    There are a couple of points I am unsure about in regard to Lightroom. Does it work in the same way as Aperture ? Meaning, can she still keep Master Files on an external RAID and Lightroom will reference them ? If the answer is yes, how do you back up your Managed ( edited ) work in Lightroom ? ( Can you still use an external Drive as a Vault ? ) . Will the vault she uses now be able to continue to back up Managed Files post migration ?

  • Does "AirPort Disk" work with RAID arrays?

    I currently have a RAID 10 array consisting of four USB hard drives all attached to a USB hub. I use it with three different macs (two leopard, one tiger) and have never had any problems. I know that you can attach multiple USB hard drives to an AirPort Extreme Base Station via a hub, but will it recognize a RAID array and make it available as a single volume over the network?

    ...but will it recognize a RAID array and make it available as a single volume over the network?
    Why did you ask that question if the device has never appeared as multiple drives?
    I understand that the AEBS is NOT a Mac.
    (a) Some RAID devices are hardware RAID devices. These devices use several hard drives but appear to the outside world as a single hard drive.
    (b) Some devices allow you to install several hard drives and then these must be pieced together into a software RAID and then appear as a single hard drive. OS X has the ability to do this.
    If this device operates like the description in (a) it should have no problem connected to the AEBS.

  • Remote sync between two RAID arrays

    We have two Xserve RAID arrays. One is here in our local office, the other at a remote site which hosts a few of our servers as well. Does anyone have any suggestions for keeping the two synced? I would like to not have to deal with tape backups in the office, but the files being stored here are pretty valuable. I've dealt with this on the Windows side with a tool called Tacit. Essentially that was a Windows box that had proprietary software that would continually update remote Tacit boxes. Anything like that on the Mac side? Possibly free? Would Automator be able to sync me up?
    Cheers!

    I made a 400.rsync script in /etc/periodic/daily:
    #!/bin/sh -
    # @(#)daily 8.2 (Berkeley) 1/25/94
    PATH=/bin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/usr/sbin:/usr/local/bin
    log=/var/log/rsync.log.`date -u ''+%y-%m-%d''`
    date > $log
    mountpoint=`mount | grep '/Volumes/EOFILMsan'`
    if [ "X$mountpoint" == "X" ]
    then
    echo "Oh Oh, Filmsan not yet mounted" >> $log
    /bin/mkdir -p /Volumes/EOFILMsan >> $log
    /sbin/mount -t acfs EOFILMsan /Volumes/EOFILMsan >> $log
    fi
    echo "START VIDEOsan" >> $log
    rsync -av --delete /Volumes/EOVIDEOsan/ /Volumes/EOFILMsan/EOVIDEOsan >> $log
    echo "END VIDEOsan" >> $log
    date >> $log

Maybe you are looking for

  • Oracle 816 on linux slackware 7.0

    hi, i have a problem while installing 816 on linux slackware 7.0. i have followed all the install instructions... but every time that it gets to the "Oracle Database Configuration Assistant" it just hangs. why would it do this?? when i terminate the

  • HELP! Cannot Compress Footage to Single Layer DVD...

    Here's my problem. I cannot compress footage to single layer DVD. I'm trying to make a DVD with motion menus and a full length feature. TRT 1 hr 47 min 3 sec. I compressed the video and audio using compressor after it did not fit on one single layer

  • JavaHelp to point to specific HTML Page

    Hi, Does anybody know how to display JavaHelp to point to a specific HTML page??? i.e when my JavaHelp opens, i want to display a component specific JavaHelp or rather a specific HTML page Help needed urgently on this Thanks kavita

  • Installing iOS 4.0.1

    Hi All, I have a MacBook Pro at home that I sync with my iPhone 3G, The 3G is currently running iOS 4.0, I haven't used a windows computer personally for a while now and if I remember correctly I think that if you install an iOS update from iTunes on

  • After update all of my subclips have different in and out points

    After updating Premiere Pro CC all of my subclips now have different in- and out points. It´s hundreds of subclips and they have nothing to do with how they´ve been before. The In-Point is always the In-Point from the original Master-Clip, the out-Po