Image Trace, high resolution

What are some tips for getting a clean (high definition, full color) Image Trace on a photo?

Like Monika said.  But use the image trace panel in the windows tab.  There are advanced features that you can adjust and tweak to your liking.  Image trace tends to be specific to the photo so you'll need to play around a little bit to get the desired effect you want.  

Similar Messages

  • How can you make a pixlated image a higher resolution in Photoshop CC? i have tryed image size but it doesnt seem to work someone please help

    As you can see in the screenshot here ----> Gyazo - b048a0770df6264af1ff398951acd4f9.png I have typed a higher resolution but when I try the pixles never seen to ever go away and it increases the file size every time, is there an easier way? PS: if another adobe cc software is needed to complete this task I have every one so it doesn't have to only be in Photoshop.

    The image has been reduced in size and over sharpened to the point that jaggies artifacts abound.  You will not be happy with the result of interpolate the images up in size increase the number of pixels..   You need to find the original image file from the camera.

  • How to avoid transparent background converting to white in smart object(psb )when image trace High Fidelity as we have the option of ignore white upto 16 colors trace.

    i have a psd image file in photoshop cc 2014 that has transparent background layer. I wanted it to convert to vector. The best option i saw was to first convert it to smart object in photoshop via Layer->Smart Objects-> Convert to smart Object. then exported it to a psb. Then i opened the file in illustrator and applied the image trace tool but the transparent background got converted to white but i had the option of ignore white upto 16 colors trace. But in case of High Fidelity Conversion, the ignore white option is not available, what should I do now?

    after using  high fidelity image trace  i hit expand, then i went to layers and hit the drop arrow by my thumbnail, which then shows <Group>,hit that drop arrow and it will show a list of all your paths, the very bottom one was my white background, you can click the eye or delete that path and it disappeared for me. i was using a png file with a transparent background, and nothing else worked for me, it always converted with white background, i never saw this mentioned anywhere, and accidentally discovered it, hope it works!!!

  • GDM-5010PT BAD IMAGE AT HIGH RESOLUTIONS

    I'm trying to install a GDM-5010PT connected to a PC. When I use the high resolutions, like 1024/768 and higher, the fonts apears with a dark line near the font, i mean as all dark lines has somethink like a dark shadow on the right, 1 or two milimetes away from the original lines. I've tried this monitor with a PC with a VIA/S3G Unichrome Pro IGP and a Intel 82865G card

    Though listed as "PC Compatible", that monitor is best driven at very specific
    screen resolutions. That includes very specific vertical refresh rates, too.
    Here's a link for that display, to a web page at a non-Sun site:
    http://www.sunshack.org/data/sh/2.1/infoserver.central/data/syshbk/Devices/Monitor/MONITOR_Color_21_Prem_CRT.html
    1024x768 is pointedly NOT a compatible resolution. It's a great screen
    and if I had one, I'd push it at 1280x1024 with a vertical refresh of 76Hz.
    If that still too coarse for you then go up to 1600x1200 at 75Hz.
    (... had one on my desk at work, in a past incarnation.
    Loved it.
    It was attached to an Ultra-5 and then a SB100,
    driving CDE at Sun's native 1152x900x76 mode.)

  • Best way to insert a table into image with high resolution for web?

    I've tried inserting a table from Excel into Photoshop and making a jpeg and gif out of it, but when I upload it to the web the resolution is terrible.
    Any ideas on how I can make get a table into an image? It's a bit too complex to create with HTML.

    Well, you are leaving out a lot of info.
    a: how are you saving it in Photoshop? What file type/compression amount, etc.
    b: how are you uplaoding it - where are you uploading it - are you uploading JUST the image, or are you uploading the image within an .html document?
    One thought, if you are JUST uploading it as an image, then trying to view it in a browser, if the image is larger than the viewport of the browser, some browsers will automatically rezie the image to fit visually into the viewport. More than likely, this resizing could be causing image distortion. Imagine it like when you zoom in/out in Photoshop - (unless you are using the accelerated graphic gui option in PS preferences), any zoom level outside of 25%, 50%, or 100% will cause visual distortion.
    Give a link to where you have uploaded the image (or whatever you are talking about). Like I said, there are other things to consider as to why this is happening.

  • How do i save a signature image in high resolution like the previous version.

    when i save a signature image in the new version, the signature is pixelated when the document is zoomed in.
    Unlike the previous version, the signature has high image quality

    As chris has pointed out GIF ony supports 1 level of transparenct Transparent or not make things like drop shadows feathed multiply blending not Posible. However you can somewhat doi it by creating your logo latge and scaling it down with Htme. Also layer mask and animation palette twend options help.
    TutorialsLinked Letters [Logo or Monogram ]
    The above gray background was added using HTML background-color: #808080;  and the logo centered using align=center"
    Link to full size animated gif http://www.mouseprints.net/JJMackAniShadow.gif  open link in new window or Tab to view...

  • Image click - Higher resolution sample?

    Hi,
    I've published my website already but I would also like to make some changes and wanted to get a better understanding for future reference. In some sites (such as blogger) you can click on an image and it will give you an enlargment of that image, sometimes in a new tab (examples below)
    http://timcallisterart.com/3d.html
    http://timcallister.blogspot.co.uk/2013/01/guy-head-update.html (original source)
    http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-vkaS3pqgj70/UOTSj0sjQoI/AAAAAAAACH8/HcD9EYIO7PQ/s1600/Untitled-1 .jpg (preview)
    Is there anyway  that I can apply this to my Muse website? I would like people to be able to view a larger version of my image
    Thanks in advance, Tim.

    Hi Tim,
    Yes you can simply apply this function with Muse.
    Check out this video: http://tv.adobe.com/watch/learn-muse/adobe-muse-creating-a-lightbox-slideshow/
    As you will see, it is easy to change the look of the light box.
    I tested myself and it was no problem to use really large images in the light box.
    Just keep the image files as small as possible.
    Good luck, André

  • How do I get high resolution on my jpg photo

    I have a photo in iphoto that I need to change to high resolution and email it.  HOw do I do that?

    You can not "change" an image to High Resolution - what ever resolution it was created at it the maximum resolution it can be
    the most general way to use the max is to select the photos in iPhoto and export it to the desktop using the highest resolution and quality settings (see the user tip on exporting for details on the options)  and email from there
    LN

  • Higher Resolution photos than Adobe Photoshop Touch allows

    I am contemplating buying the Adobe Photoshop Touch but I am concerned about how it can only have a maximum image resolution of 1600x1600. I take photos all of the time at a far higher resolution so I am worried that the app won't even work with the photos that I take. If someone could tell me that I would be able to edit my higher resolution photos on this app, then I will buy it with all haste... Thanks

    Sorry, it won't.  For whatever reason Adobe decided that PS Touch should only handle 1600x1600 images.  Images of higher resolution are scaled down so you can load and work on your high-res photos, but the output would not exceed the 1600 limit.

  • Is there a way to take a high resolution image, and trace it in a lower resolution?

    Layers appear to need to be all in the same resolution, so I'm thinking layers are out. Is there any other ways to do this?

    Hi Trevor, thanks for responding!
    Basically, my goal is to use a higher resolution image as the basis for pixel art, but underlaying the higher resolution source picture under a much lower resolution layer, and "trace" out the basis for the pixel art on top of it. I suppose it would be a bit like onion skinning, but I'd need the two (layers? canvasses?) to be of radically different resolutions to accomplish what I'm trying to achieve. It's not a "size" issue, as I'd want the top to be the same physical size as the bottom, just have the top be, let's say 64 pixels by 64 pixels, and the bottom image to be 800 pixels by 800 pixels.
    If that doesn't make sense, let me know, and I'll have another go at it!
    Thanks very much!

  • High ram usage when loading high resolution images

    Hello,
    I'm wondering why Firefox almost hangs my system while opening high-resolution images like this one (save your data, you have been warned):
    http://minecraft.1favre.de/output.png
    While opening, it involves X process to use CPU and a lot of memory (it's freed shortly after loading the image). Other browsers don't do that. Moreover, other browsers don't do any problems with such images, they load it fast and efortless. I Have 2GB of RAM.
    Firefox memory usage: http://wklej.org/id/1027301/
    Konqueror memory usage: http://wklej.org/id/1027305/
    Opera memory usage: http://wklej.org/id/1027306/
    Chromium was problematic with getting the log: http://img.koci.net.pl/images/screen252.png
    Unfortunately I was unable to generate log with nvidia-bugreport.sh. Doesn't work, strange. Here are some details of my system:
    02:00.0 VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation G73 [GeForce 7300 GT] (rev a1)
    nvidia-settings: version 304.88 (buildmeister@swio-display-x86-rhel47-06) Wed Mar 27 15:32:47 PDT 2013
    [root@linux mk]# uname -a
    Linux linux 3.8.10-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Sat Apr 27 12:36:59 CEST 2013 x86_64 GNU/Linux
    root@linux mk]# X -version
    X.Org X Server 1.14.1
    Release Date: 2013-04-17
    X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0
    Build Operating System: Linux 3.8.7-1-ARCH x86_64
    Current Operating System: Linux linux 3.8.10-1-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Sat Apr 27 12:36:59 CEST 2013 x86_64
    Kernel command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-linux root=UUID=9ddb4ac2-a9bf-44db-830c-9ba210ea6d12 ro quiet
    Build Date: 17 April 2013 02:37:06PM
    Current version of pixman: 0.28.2

    Hello,
    The Reset Firefox feature can fix many issues by restoring Firefox to its factory default state while saving your essential information.
    Note: ''This will cause you to lose any Extensions, Open websites, and some Preferences.''
    To Reset Firefox do the following:
    #Go to Firefox > Help > Troubleshooting Information.
    #Click the "Reset Firefox" button.
    #Firefox will close and reset. After Firefox is done, it will show a window with the information that is imported. Click Finish.
    #Firefox will open with all factory defaults applied.
    Further information can be found in the [[Reset Firefox – easily fix most problems]] article.
    Did this fix your problems? Please report back to us!
    Thank you.

  • Moving high resolution images from PSE6 to Premiere Elements 4

    I am trying to take a pdf map (happens to be of the San Diego Zoo) and insert it into a Premiere Elements 4 (PE4) project to show where we went in the Zoo and then show our family pictures/video in that area
    So I bring the pdf map file into PSE6 and convert it to a jpeg and/or psd file so I can import it into PE4 (which cannot import a pdf). It works fine, but if I don't increase the image size in PSE6 the image becomes super blurry in PE4 when I change the scale (zoom in).
    However, when I do increase the image size in PSE6 and save as either a jpeg or psd so it will be clear at 250% scale in PE4, I get this error message when I try to import it to PE4: "File video dimensions (width/height) too large."
    This happens even when I leave the dimensions (8.5 X 8.176 inches) the same and just change the ppi for the higher resolution I need. It starts out as a 300 ppi image and I get the error message even if I only change it to as high as 500 ppi. (And if I go much lower than that, it's not going to help the resolution enough to be worth it in PE4).
    (btw, the original pdf file is perfectly clear in PSE6 at 1000+% and the converted jpeg/psd are clear enough in PSE6 at 250%)
    So, my question is:
    How do I improve the picture quality in PSE6 so that it's not blurry when I export to PE4 and increase the scale, but maintain the right size that PE4 will accept?
    This might be somewhat of a PSE6 question, but hopefully somebody knows the answer and can help me out! Thanks!

    Joseph,
    In an NLE, you are really only using the pixel x pixel dimensions. DPI/PPI mean nothing, except a larger file size.
    You can set the PPI to 72 and be fine for TV. You might want to bump it up slightly, if you are outputting to a progressive file for display on a computer, but even then, you'll not need much.
    PSD will be as clear a format, as you can get. I'd not bother with any JPG compression, as by the time that you lower the compression settings, i.e. compress less, to keep the quality, you will not have compressed all that much.
    For zooming in, you do not need for the image to be much larger than the preset for your Project. The FAQ's at the top of the page have some good recs. for the exact sizing. If you will be panning, while zoomed out, you'll want just enough extra to allow for that movement.
    Depending on the native resolution of your PDF's image, you should be able to get a reasonably sharp image onto the TV screen. Also, judge the final look of this image on a TV, if that is your final output, as it will appear better, than on the computer screen. I use a DVD RW for this sort of testing and just re-use the discs.
    Last, do all of your re-sizing (as much as is possible) in Photoshop. The algorithms are a bit better than in an NLE. Now, for a dynamic zoom, you have no choice but to use Motion>Scale.
    Hunt

  • Saving an image to a higher resolution from a lower one

    I have photoshop cs6 on my MacBook Pro and downloaded images I'm working on for a friend who needs them for professional use. They're all in 72 dpi so I managed to save them at a higher resolution of 300 dpi, and in Tiff format but when I try to email them the images revert back to 72 dpi. How can I keep the resolution at 300 or higher for email
    Thanks

    I know you haven't asked for advice about the actual re-sampling process, but I can't help myself .
    If the images are for print reproduction or a similar high quality requirement the results are likely to be very poor even if up-sampled to 300dpi. It's OK to down-sample images if the pixel data is there in the first place. If it's only 72dpi and then up-sampled, and even if it looks good on screen, it'll be rubbish in commercial print.
    The exception might be if the actual dimensions of the 72dpi image is large and it is up-sampled to 300dpi but at the same time the dimensions are reduced considerably that should help preserve some quality.
    All that said, if you are using Mail, try selecting Actual Size, as shown in the image (if you haven't already). The option only appears when you add an attachment to an email.

  • Is it possible to convert a PDF to a high resolution image with ColdFusion?

    I would like to determine how to convert PDFs to high resolution images using ColdFusion.
    I'm running ColdFusion 9,0,0,251028 on CentOS 5.5 with Apache 2.2.3.
    The <cfpdf action = "thumbnail" ...> is all well and good for creating 72 dpi images of a PDF, but I need to be able to create 300 dpi images of a PDF.
    The PDFs in question have a much higher level of detail available than 72 dpi.
    The related scale attribute for the action="thumbnail" functionality has an accepted range of 1 to 100, but an example of what I need is something more like a value of 415.
    I should mention that I did try to use the jpgdpi attribute, and set it to 300 dpi . . . which produced a JPG that was indeed set to 300 dpi, but still had the same pixel dimensions as the 72 dpi image, so this did not affect the pdf to jpg conversion process in any way to make the image higher resolution.
    Alternatively, would another possibility be to use ColdFusion to alter the dimensions of the pdf to be 415% of its original dimensions in memory, and then output a 100% thumbnail of that altered PDF? Is this possible? I can not for the life of me work out how to alter the set dimensions of a PDF via ColdFusion, in order to determine if this would have an affect on the size of the thumbnail produced.
    Or more broadly, how would you use ColdFusion to convert a PDF to a (or a series of) high resolution images?
    Thanks in advance for any help on this.

    Another idea:
    Use a third party tool with CFEXECUTE if there's no other way. As you're on Linux you could easily run ghostscript on the command line to do it. gs lets you specify filetype as the device and also has options for resolution. For Windows there's gs as well (not sure though what it's command line capabilities are there) or tools like this: http://www.softinterface.com/Convert-PDF-To-Image/Convert-PDF-To-Tiff.htm
    Cheers
    Kai

  • Increasing physical dimensions of high resolution image?

    I have an image that I want to use in a video, though it is not physically large enough to fill the 1920 x 1080 dimensions of the video, though it has a 300ppi resolution and video only needs 72ppi. How do I take advantage of the fact that it is high resolution image, and increase the physical dimensions of the image? Is there a way to do this?
    Thanks.

    Hi Marian.
    Thanks for the excellent link. And I believe it is spot on.
    ***Warning: This is an off topic rant. And it's over 500 words.***
    I did not get my first computer until 2001. Although I am a scientist at heart (university trained in chemistry and physics), and quite comfortable with technology, there was something deep within me that was resistant to buying a computer. Almost an inner foreboding. Even though I had already been using corporate computer nets (not the internet) since 1979, the PC seemed ominous to me.
    And the internet seemed even more ominous. To the point that I didn't hook up to the web until 2006. I had a sense that the web was a double edged sword, and had the potential to diminish its users. Even though I had never been on line and had very little idea of what it was really all about. What I found was what I feared. A wasteland punctuated by oases of useful information. A wasteland in the literal sense. For every second saved on the task at hand, a minute is wasted by the distractions that bombard us on the way to saving that second.
    I'm not saying that the web is bad. Just that it's fraught with danger. And the worst danger is the notion that a concrete answer to every question is just a Google away. And with that, the odieous notion that every question can be answered comprehensively in one quarter of an internet page, leaving the rest for advertising.
    I do quite a bit of writing, and my first experience at writing for the internet was a disaster. Among other things, I am a fly fishing guide. A new internet fly fishing magazine had requested I submit a series of articles. Personal anecdotes about my experiences. The first article I submitted was about 2400 words. They loved it, but they said it said it was too long. So, I did a rewrite. It came in at 1800 words. And the rewrite took more time and effort than writing the original 2400 words. And the article was diminished. And still too long. They wanted it shorter.
    At this point, I dug in my heels. I admitted I understood such constraints on paper publishing, but how could they insist on such constraints on web publishing? How much does is cost to add a web page to an article? It's just another page they could slather with advertising. To which they replied, no one will read an article longer than 1200 words. I was flabbergasted. I like long articles and books. I'm bummed when I come to the end. In the end, these folks had an editor hack it down to 1200 words and publish it over my signature without my knowledge or permission. When I saw the article, I was appalled. I didn't recognize it. And demanded they take it down.
    Maybe the publisher was right about his readers having short attention spans. I hope not, but I'm afraid it's true. And this mindset is the 500 pound gorilla in the room that few want to address.
    I'm not by any stretch suggesting we should turn back the clock of progress. Only that we need to be aware of the negative potential of any new technology. And resist that negative potential with all our hearts. Or our minds will suffer.
    FWIW.
    Peace,
    Lee

Maybe you are looking for