Image won't export after using Aperture 2's new retouching tools

After I used the new retouching tools: clone and repair in Aperture 2 on a small jpeg image from a Canon point and shoot, I tried to export my image to desktop. Although the exporting "wheel" indicated the image was being exported it showed nothing after 10 minutes and I had to cancel the export. After I "Removed Adjustments" it exported in a flash. Other images that had not been retouched and retouched RAW images exported just fine. I have reported a bug to Apple. Any suggestions?

I had a similar problem with the Aperture trial until I deleted my Aperture library and re-installed the trial. I had previously (about a year ago) installed an earlier version Aperture trial and I might have still had the old library file on my hard drive. I wonder if the Aperture 2 trial upgraded the old library and corrupted it. After I reinstalled, export is still slow when retouch is used, but it works. If you don't have much invested in your Aperture library, you might try backing it up, deleting it and creating a new one. I'm just speculating, though.
Message was edited by: Cyrtolite

Similar Messages

  • HT5260 iphoto only shows photo with 5 stars in the event after using aperture

    iphoto only shows photo with 5 stars in the event after using aperture...
    help

    Thanks for your response again.
    and this happen to every single folder in iphoto.

  • How can I export photos from Aperture with a new sequence and ignore the embedded JPEG number? Have tried renumbering to no avail.

    How can I export photos from APERTURE with a new sequence and ignore the embedded JPEG number? Have tried renumbering to no avail.
    has anyone resolved this issue?
    This is now the second big Problem with using Apple's Appeture with NO apparent FIX...
    Aperture has NO DIRECT way to Burn to a CD/DVD & apparently NO way to RE-SEQUENCE the numbering system????
    ANYONE... I wish APPLE would address/fix these 2 problems... LIGHTROOM I guess is next?

    Hi David,
    Coming in and whining loudly is rude.  We are all volunteers here, voluntarily sharing our expertise so that users like you can make the most of their time with Aperture.  Speaking just for myself:  although I do care about your success with software (it's why I'm here), I don't care what software you use.  If you want to use Lightroom, do so, and post your questions in an appropriate forum.
    Burning files to a CD is a file operation done at the system level (it is built into OS X).  Aperture lets your create sharable image-format files from your Images.  You then use OS X's tools to burn those files to a CD.  Iirc, you can set up a "Burn Folder" in Finder, into which you can export files created from your Images, and with a single click burn your CD.
    Naming the files you create by exporting your Images can be tricky.  There are _many_ possibilities.  Some things can't be done.  Sequencing can be done in a number of ways (see Léonie's answer above).  What have you tried?  What was the result?  In what way did this differ from what you expected?
    --Kirby.

  • What is krb5kdc, why did it  interfere after using or sync'ing new MBA

    what is krb5kdc, why did it interfere after using or sync'ing new MBA ???
    It showed up in console and other logs and activity monitor after sync'ing others with new MBA late 2010.
    Caused keychain problems and connection problems to my well-used secure wifi network and other processes.
    Never happened before the New MBA late 2010, now causing problems with other computers synched via MobileMe after initial sync with new MBA
    Message was edited by: Rhyd

    http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=6739752

  • Aperture library won't open after using new iphoto

    My Aperture library won't open after accidently using iphoto to view it. It says Aperture is outdated but I run 3.4.5 version which is the last.
    Now I CAN'T DO MY WORK thanks to this lunacy.
    Anyone any suggestions how to fix this ****?

    Also one more thing
    On the MacBook Air - Where aperture is working fine and loading the library, i tried to change the name of the library and then when I tried to open it it shouted with the error ""Error Opening Library--The library could not be imported because it is from an out of date version of Aperture 3. Please upgrade the library to the latest version of Aperture 3 and try again""
    But when I changed the name back it was working fine again on the MacBook AIr
    Should i be worried that when i look at the get info on my library it says it's an aperture library 3.5.1 ?
    Pandava

  • Image quality of slide shows using Aperture 3 seems inferior to iPhoto '08

    I haven't previously used Aperture. I've been using a copy of iPhoto '08 for several years. I've shot everything in RAW for the last several years and process it in
    DXO on my Mac Pro (3 1/2 years old with 7 gigs of RAM). I then load the jpegs into iPhoto '08.
    I downloaded Aperture 3 yesterday, and it certainly is impressive in what it can do for improving existing jpegs. I think I could do most touch-ups with Aperture
    instead of Photoshop 3. Because of some glitch, I couldn't load or link to my 37,000 images from iPhoto but I did export about 4000 images as full jpegs into
    a separate file and then imported these images into Aperture. Touch-ups are an order of magnitude better that trying to use iPhoto to do the same.
    I'm an amateur and aside from a fair amount of print making and a few thousand images uploaded to a new Picasa account
    http://picasaweb.google.com/jamesn88888
    I enjoy a lot of my images via slide shows on my 23" Apple monitor, usually sequenced at 3 seconds per slide.
    Comparing slide shows of identical jpegs run with iPhoto '08 and then with the files uploaded to Aperture 3 there is a very subtle loss of definition with Aperture. It's not so
    obvious when viewing relatively large detail but is is very noticeable when running slides containing small detail. When both of these programs are just used to display static images full screen I note no difference in readability. Someone suggested that I check the preferences for preview displays. Sure enough, it was set for relatively low quality. I decided to re-do all 4000 images maximum preview display quality.
    Using the import settings that came already selected on the trial software, the total size of my
    Aperture 3 trial library was a little over 25 GB. The quality of the slide shows did not approximate
    the quality of the slide shows of the identical jpegs included in my iPhoto '08 library.
    I therefore re-processed all of the previews to the "don't limit" in the photo preferences. The total size of my Aperture 3 trial library grew from 25GB to 41.37GB, an increase of 17 GB. With 3926 jpegs in the library that means the average additional size added to each preview image was 4.33 Megabytes. Inasmuch as the original jpeg images that I imported into Aperture 3 were more in the neighborhood of 1.7 to 3.5 Megabytes each (I have DXO output most jpegs @ 90% quality- fine for my purposes), this is an extreme measure to take in order to be able to use Aperture 3 the same way that I used iPhoto '08. In comparing slide shows between the two applications I still get the feeling that there is a very slight loss in acutance when viewing the slide shows. iPhoto still wins out.
    I think that I'm better off staying with iPhoto and continuing to do the RAW processing with DXO and slight file modifications with iPhoto. More elaborate changes can continue to be done using Photoshop 3 and Viveza. It's a shame, because I really like the image processing abilities that are contained in the new Aperture.
    Have any of you compared slide show views on your computer between Aperture and iPhoto?
    Is there any workaround for best slide show viewing- importing or referencing my existing iPhoto library of 37,000 images does not work for me. My copy of iPhoto 7.1.5 get the message that Aperture cannot import or link to iPhoto earlier than 7.1.5 (?)

    I think I've solved my problem with a Google Search. I came across a free slide show generator
    (contributions requested) that shows much higher quality slide shows than either iPhoto or Aperture 3.
    You click on a folder of jpegs and it almost immediately generates thumbnails and within a few seconds
    I can be viewing a full screen, tack sharp, slideshow of all of the files in the folder. Much sharper than
    I'm used to seeing.
    I think I'll keep the Aperture 3 and use if for the purpose it's intended for in the future. I'll also redo the
    image preview files to the small size it started with and then I'll copy all of the files I'm interested in from
    iPhoto into a separate folder on another disk. I'll use Aperture to catalog and to perform image manipulations
    on but I won't try to use it as an iPhoto replacement. I don't think I'll be using iPhoto much as an image
    viewer in the future either after I finish moving my favorite pictures to the Phoenix Slides folder.
    The name of the free program is Phoenix Slides. It's free to download and try, free to keep (though I
    think you'd want to pay the small amount requested) and fast. My pictures have never looked so good
    before.
    http://blyt.net/phxslides/
    Message was edited by: Jimbo2001

  • JPopupMenu won't disappear after using it!

    I'm using a JPopupMenu on a JTable. When I rightclick on a line in my table, I display a dialogbox to make some selections which you can close by clicking an OK button. The problem is, that when I close the dialog box the JPopupMenu won't go away. More exact: Parts of it persist on the screen, but it is more like a background image, since it then is no longer functional (menu items are not highlighted etc.). Does anybody know a workaround to this problem why the pop up menu doesn't go away after using it?

    Have you tried firepopupMenuCacelled() ??
    This is a method of JPopupmenu that notifies listeners that it hacs been cancelled.... ??
    Or maybe a mouse removed listener event to close the JPopupMenu... ??

  • Images load really slow after using Reduce File Size...

    After using the "Reduce File Size..." feature in Acrobat 9 on Windows Vista, some of the images load really slow as I page through the document. Is there some kind of compression setting that I should look for to prevent the images from be affected by this?
    For some of my documents it will take 30 to 60 seconds to load an image. Sometimes I can't do anything with the document until the graphic loads entirely.

    Can you post an example of a file that has this issue? Personally, I recommend using the PDF optimizer, it gives better control of the final pdf file.

  • Using Aperture 3 with new (2011) iMac

    Currently I have been using Aperture 3 with my MBP. My library is on an external drive. When I bought my iMac, I hooked up my drive to that machine and then opened Aperture and I got a message that popped up saying something like my library was 32bit and the iMac is 64bit and I would have to convert my entire library over to be able to use AP3 on my iMac. Does this sound right. I remember it was something along those lines and I ended up not converting all my files and still use my MBP instead.

    How is your workflow set up? How are you moving the Aperture Library around? What OS X and what Aperture versions?
    After backup to an independent drive (stuff happens...) make sure all apps and the OS are current. Also read this regarding
    Switching Kernels:
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4287
    HTH
    -Allen

  • Won't let me use photoshop cc on new laptop

    won't let me use my photoshop cc that I recently downloaded a free trial of on my old computer on my newer one that I recently purchased. It's very aggrivating, and I would like to use my newer computer rather then switch back and forth. I signed into the same adobe ID, and also downloaded the application manager....HELP?!

    Chat Now button near the bottom for Activation and Deactivation problems may help
    http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/policy-pricing/activation-deactivation-products.html
    OR
    Asked to sign in after paying may help
    -http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/policy-pricing/activation-network-issues.html
    or
    http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-cloud/kb/license-this-software.html
    Membership and Payments http://helpx.adobe.com/x-productkb/policy-pricing/membership-subscription-troubleshooting- creative-cloud.html

  • Image won't open after right click and "open with" command using Editor PSE 10

    Can't see image after right click and "open with" Windows XP command using Editor PSE 10. The editor opens but no image appears. I have to use the open command from within Editor

      Make sure you have chosen the application PhotoshopElementsEditor.exe and not a shortcut.
    To manually associate a file format with an application:
    In Windows Explorer, right-click a file whose file association you want to change. For example, if you want to change the file association for all jpeg files, click a jpeg file.
    Choose Open With > Choose Program from the pop-up menu.
    In the Open With dialog box, click Browse and then locate and select the exe application file.
    Checkmark "Always use the selected program to open this kind of file" and click OK.
    Note:If you choose a program from the Open With menu in step 2, instead of selecting the Choose Program option, this check box is not available, and the file association won't work.

  • Image won't open after copy from lr 3 to ps3

    hello,
    ps cs3  won't open an image after i select copy or use original from LR 3 3.5 /camera raw 6.5.
    if i select open with LR adjustments (first choice at top) image will open.
    i'm guessing this has something to do with the version of camera raw??
    thanks, Owen

    Ok, i did some testing and here's what i came up with. I use both the d200 and d700.
    all files are .nef's. the files of the d700 open in all 3 options from LR3.
    there are some photos from d200 that open with all 3 options as well, however i found that in another series of photos with the d200 when i open the nef, do changes, and hit save, it doesn't reimport, it puts it in the folder as .tiff but doens't bring it back into LR
    i can import the .tiff  back into LR3 but once it's imported my only option is to open with LR changes.
    This is a bit strange?? two different shooting sessions, all in .nef one opens and reimports as .tif and the others don't.
    thoughts?

  • How do I get a mirror image of a photo when using aperture?

    can someone explain this i am new to aperture and mac for that matter!!!

    You may be able to modify the EXIF data. I don't know quite how Aperture will behave, but Preview works fine.
    So, if you have [exiftool|http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool> (which can be a scary proposition if you're not familiar with the Terminal), you can modify the tags in picture headers. One tag, called "Orientation" (See [http://www.sno.phy.queensu.ca/~phil/exiftool/TagNames/EXIF.html]) tells your image viewer how to interpret the pixel data in the picture. You can change that tag to "Mirror Horizontal" instead of "Horizontal (normal)" and see what happens. This tells any good image viewer to decode the pixel data in the picture, but do it so the left of the picture in the file is on the right when you display it.
    You should do this to picture not managed by Aperture, and then import the picture into Aperture.
    So, after installing exiftool, do the following at a Terminal:
    exiftool -Orientation='Mirror Horizontal' file1 file2 ... file_n
    Where the file1... part is a list of picture files that you want to flip.
    I just tried that with a picture on my desktop, and Preview opened it just fine and had it as a horizontal mirror image. I didn't import it into Aperture (Since it's already there as the correct image), but you may want to experiment with this until there's a built-in feature.
    nathan

  • Disk Images won't open after update to 10.4.10

    After updating to 10.4.10 disk images (dmg-files) won't open any more. I get the error message "The following disk images failed to mount:.. Reason: Device not configured". This happens every time on every disk image. These same images mounted just fine before the update.
    Any ideas?

    what if the disk image is on an attached FireWire Drive?
    there is no OS on that drive, so I can't repair permissions.
    I have two disk images on it: one opens fine, the other I get "no mountable file systems"
    It opened just fine a few weeks ago
    ??

  • Import Aperture Adjusted Versions After Using Aperture Importer

    I have used the Adobe Aperture Importer tool to migrate my Aperture Library to Lightroom. The process seemed to work well and was pretty painless. However, i did not realize initially that the adjustments don't carry over at all (I expected they would at least become exported TIF/JPG versions). So naturally I have a lot of versions in Aperture now that have none of the adjustments that were made to them.
    Basically I'm wondering how exactly to proceed.
    I've found the online guide for importing both the masters and exported/adjusted versions to Lightroom (http://macnn.com/rd/315385==http://landing.adobe.com/dam/downloads/whitepapers/54511.en.sw itch-from-aperture-to-lightroo…) although given that I've used the Importer, I'm kind of stuck awkwardly part way through that process.
    I am creating an Aperture Smart Album with all the adjusted versions in it (that's taking a while, there's a lot). I can export those to a Year/Month/Day folder. However, given that I've already imported the masters, will the Import to Lightroom work? Will the new versions go into the same folders as the existing masters? Will I be able to pair them (ie in Stacks) with their corresponding masters? Am I going to wind up with a mess between the unadjusted versions Lightroom already imported and the new adjusted versions I'm adding to the mix?

    You can probably do this a few ways.
    You ask "Will the new versions go into the same folders as the existing masters? Will I be able to pair them (ie in Stacks) with their corresponding masters?" Do you want the answers to be yes to each question? Is this what you want? Assuming so....
    My initial thought is that you would export the versions to a folder called Aperture Versions, with subfolders by date or however you wish.
    It would make sense to test with a small number of the exported versions. Do a regular Import Photos (not the Aperture Importer tool) and choose Move in the Import dialog. Point the import's destination to the new Pictures/LightroomMasters folder (created by the Aperture Importer tool), and split the import by date. What I think will happen is that the version files will now end up in the same folders as the corresponding masters, and then you'll be able to stack them too.
    Does this seem clear? I've not tested it, and I've assumed you selected default options in the Aperture Importer tool (my steps would be different if you set some options). You should back up your LR catalogue before trying it.
    John

Maybe you are looking for