Images displaying differently in Library view to Develop - also affecting Exports

I've run in to a strange problem since the 4.1 upgrade.
When displayed in the Library view, images are not appearing correctly. In my case, there is a huge amount more noise in the Library view compared to the Develop view. This is also affecting Exports.
I have been unable to find any answers online, and only found one other case of this reported via a You Tube video.
Any ideas?!
Many thanks
Rick

I am assuming you have a correctly calibrated monitor calibrated using a hardware calibrator. Lightroom sometimes shows the aforementioned problems with canned monitor profiles on windows machines. Now that out of the way:
I am also having this problem - the library view is closer to the printer output - very frustrating! In dev mode the image is lighter - sometimes appears to be too hot, but in library and during print it is just right. This was not a problem in 3 - what's the fix?
Have you tried seeing what happens when you soft proof for the paper profile in the Develop module?
It seem the fit views do not match up...the confusion comes in that it seems the fill views sometimes do, and sometimes do not match. when the images appear different, I've the sense in dev the images are brighter and hotter.
This can happen if your image is very noisy or has a lot of high frequency detail. The sharpening preview in fit view that is applied in Develop tends to brighten images with lots of noise or detail. It also happens when you are applying a lot of color noise reduction and have a lot of colored detail. SInce Lightroom cannot really show you the result of this correctly but for when looking at 1:1, this results in the Fit preview showing more color saturation than there really is.

Similar Messages

PS CS5 Image Display Differs From Used ICC Profile In Win 7

Hi,
on my Windows 7 Ultimate x64 machine, I just calibrated my Dell SP2309W monitor using an i1DisplayPro and basICColor 5, creating a ICC v2 profile (I am aware of the problems under Windows with ICC v4 profiles).
It created the ICC profile and applied it to be used by Windows. I double checked under COLOR MANAGEMENT that the new ICC profile is being used. Although I can see that the new ICC is being used (desktop appearance changes), there are a few issues I am experiencing:
(1.) Windows Photo Viewer
The thumbnails in Windpows Explorer look fine (they DO use the new ICC profile), when I double click a jpeg and open the image it DOES NOT use the new ICC profile. When I click the PLAY SLIDESHOW button (starting the slideshow) in the opened image in Windows Photo Viewer, the images DO use the new ICC profile.
(2.) Internet Browsers
All current internet browser (Firefox, IE, Safari and Chrome) DO use the new ICC profile and display the image correctly.
(3.) Photoshop CS 5
When I open the same image - that Windows Photo Viewer does not correctly displays (according to the new ICC profile) - in Photoshop CS5, I get the same image display that Windows Photo Viewer gives me (when not thumbnail or not in slideshow mode) - it appears to be the sRGB display.
My color settings in PS CS5 are: North America General Purpose 2 > sRGB IEC 61966-2.1.
When I go to View > Proof Setup > Monitor RGB I get the image display using the new ICC profile.
Why does the image look different in PS than my calibrated monitor should output ?
I was under the impression (please correct me if I am wrong), that the sole purpose for calibrating my monitor was to get a uniform display across (ICC aware) applications. Even when one applies different color spaces to a document in PS, I thought the output on my calibrated screen done by the graphic card should always be according to my calibration and the settings in the ICC profile being used.
What Am I doing wrong or what am I misunderstanding ?
Any help or input is appreciated !
Thanks.
- M

Hello,
A note on monitor calibration: calibrating your monitor will not guarentee that every application will display color correctly, it's more of a step along the pipeline, and for the preview part of a color workflow it's the last step. Here's how color translation follows for an ICC workflow when previewing to a monitor:
Image Color Numbers > Document Tag or Workspace Profile > Monitor Profile
For non-color managed applications, if the original document is or isn't tagged with a color profile it will be translated directly to the monitor profile anyway. This is the equivalent in Photoshop of selecting "Monitor" in soft proofing. Selecting monitor in softproofing will bypass the tagged or workspace profile to translate colors directly through the monitor profile.
For most automatic color managed applications (like Firefox), the image will be translated through the tagged profile and then sent through the monitor profile. If the image is untagged or the profile is unrecognized, the colors get sent directly to the monitor profile.
For Photoshop, a tagged document will have its profile respected and then sent to the monitor. An untagged document will be assigned the workspace profile, which acts like a temporary document profile, and then gets sent to the monitor. This is often why users will notice Photoshop behaves differently from other applications. It's usually a case of the workspace coming into play. By default the workspace profile is set to sRGB. You can change this in Edit > Color Settings.
The purpose of the workspace is originally for printing workflows, as a way of keeping consistant color translations when dealing with both tagged and untagged documents. For web output workflows it can be useful for viewing everything through sRGB, which is typical of the average monitor output (not so with newer wide-gamut monitors, another source of confusion...) combined with the fact that originally most web browsers were not color managed. Hence viewing everything through sRGB is pretty close to what most monitors see and what untagged/unmanaged docs will look like.
Monitor calibration is useful only because it brings your monitor output to a "known state". In traditional workflows the monitor was always a middle-man, a preview device which was useful for getting an idea of what the printed output would look like before you print it. Since print colorspaces are often smaller than display spaces, it's feasible and useful to narrow down the monitor/display space and calibrate it to a known state, so that even if it doesn't totally match the print, you'll get used to its differences/limitations and they'll be consistent so long as the calibration is maintained.
For web output, your final output is often another user's computer monitor, which can have any form of behavior (most standard monitors are pretty close to sRGB, or use sRGB as an operating system workspace (default monitor profile). Wide gamuts behave differently, but I'm not sure if there's a particular ICC space that they closely match, or if different wide-gamuts are even that close to each other in their display color spaces.
Hope this helps!

Display a document library view on a subsite

Hi
I have SharePoint 2013 On-Premise and I would like to display a document library from the top level site in a subsite. This subsite will then be saved as a template and used to create other subsites.
For example,
I have a site called Site 1. In Site 1 there is a document library called doclib1. Site1 also has a subsite called subsiteA.
I would like to display a view from doclib1 in subsiteA. SubsiteA will then be used as a template to create subsiteB, subsiteC etc.
I have tried a few things but these have not worked or I am not doing it correctly. Here is what I have tried
Copied doclib1 code from site1 to subsiteA using SPDesigner. I get the error "List does not exist......"
Used a Content Query Webpart. I get the error "Something went wrong"
Used a Data view web part. The complete page was displayed. I only want the view
Although it looks possible, I do not know how to take this forward. All I need is to display generic documents on each subsite that can be modified from one location.
Marc Collins www.QGate.co.uk

Hi,
To get the custom field in the search filter. You need to follow these steps.
Go to the Search schema from the Manage Service Applications -> Search Service Application in Central Administration
Create a Managed property for your field (Category)
Map the crawl property to the Managed property.
Once managed property created, run the full crawl.
Once full crawl executed, you are able to get your filter property in the search filter.
http://blogs.perficient.com/microsoft/2012/07/sp2013-search-quickie-createmap-a-new-managed-property-powershell/
Even though 2010 article, for 2013 steps are same.
http://johnrossjr.wordpress.com/2011/03/18/creating-custom-managed-properties/
Please mark it answered, if your problem resolved or helpful.

Saved image displays differently outside Photoshop

When I save an image I've been working on in Photoshop, then open the saved file outside Photoshop, the image looks quite different than it does inside Photoshop, much drabber and less saturated. I have both Photoshop and the display program set to sRGB. I figure that I should have consistency within the monitor, whether it's calibrated or not. I'm sure I'm missing something basic here. I'd appreciate any help here, because my prints wind up drab, too. Many thanks!

LBJack wrote:
I overlooked one switch in the Save dialog. Now the images display correctly.
Can you be more specific, please?
Were you saving images without a color profile before, and some application(s) in your system were displaying them improperly?
Problem is, in that case one wouldn't really expect to see the kind of difference you describe unless your document profile really wasn't sRGB IEC61966-2.1.
Is it possible you're editing your images in the Adobe RGB 1998 color space? That could happen if you're opening images through Camera Raw, as the color space it's set to deliver is configured separately (via the link at the bottom-center of the Camera Raw dialog) from the Photoshop defaults.
By the way, if you don't already know, you can easily set the status block in the lower-left of the Photoshop window to show you the color space of your current document:
-Noel

Image Displays Differently in PS and Br CS4

I have a gs tif file that I converted to cmyk. In PS the cmyk version looks virtually identical on screen to the gs version although when you hold the eyedropper over the image, cyan displays as a higher percentage than m or y, with k lowest in both the cmyk conversion and the grayscale original...what do I have set wrong! In Bridge the cmyk version clearly shows a cyan cast.
Color settings are synchronized in CS4.
Can anyone tell me why: 1, the images are displaying differently, and, 2. using Convert To Profile, cymk, Working CMYK US Sheetfed Coated v2, image appears to have a distince cyan cast? And why, for that matter, is the GS image showing uneven cmyk percentages?
Thanks in advance
J

the images are displaying differently
Have you proofing enabled in both of them? Even if the profiles match otehrwise, that option still has to be toggled.
image appears to have a distince cyan cast?
Well, if you print CMYK, you want "rich black", which means that it needs to be underprinted with another color to not look like a dull gray. Only spot black/ text black does not require that. That's not the point here, though. It's really due to the conversion being done wrong. If you really want to retain the blacks as a pure channel, use the method described. Also, if you can, in the future simply start out in CMYK to avoid these issues.
Mylenium

Images displayed differently in Firefox

I have a Dreamweaver page that displays normally in IE. But when I open it in firefox, one of the elements is displayed differently. Specifically, I have some social media icons that are supposed to be displayed horizontally, and they are in IE. But when I open the same page in Firefox, it displays those same icons vertically. How can I correct that? Thanks.
http://www.blackexpotourweb.com/hampton.html

This is what I see
<style type="text/css">
html {
    background-color: #000;
    height: 100%
body {
    width: 1000px;
    margin: auto;
    background: url(http://www.keystonemkg.com/Hampton.gif) no-repeat;
    height: 800px;
    position:relative;
    background-image: url(Hampton.gif);
.maintext {
    font-family: "Courier New", Courier, monospace;
#apDiv1 {
    position:absolute;
    width:174px;
    height:305px;
    z-index:1;
    left: 289px;
    top: 329px;
#apDiv2 {
    position:absolute;
    width:328px;
    height:449px;
    z-index:2;
    left: 138px;
    top: -49px;
#apDiv3 {
    position:absolute;
    width:137px;
    height:126px;
    z-index:2;
    left: 448px;
    top: 417px;
.infotext {
    font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif;
    color: #FFF;
siteinfo {
    font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif;
    font-weight: bold;
    color: #000;
.siteinfo {
    font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif;
    color: #000;
#apDiv4 {
    position:absolute;
    width:715px;
    height:22px;
    z-index:3;
    left: 253px;
    top: 804px;
#apDiv5 {
    position:absolute;
    width:170px;
    height:242px;
    z-index:4;
    left: 46px;
    top: 408px;
    text-align: center;
dropsha {
    border-top-style: solid;
    border-right-style: solid;
    border-bottom-style: solid;
    border-left-style: solid;
#apDiv6 {
    position:absolute;
    width:883px;
    height:62px;
    z-index:5;
    left: 71px;
    top: 141px;
    vertical-align: middle;
    text-align: center;
#apDiv7 {
    position:absolute;
    width:170px;
    height:69px;
    z-index:4;
    left: 51px;
    top: 710px;
    text-align: center;
#apDiv4 .infotext .siteinfo {
eventtext {
    font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif;
#apDiv8 {
    position:absolute;
    width:181px;
    height:27px;
    z-index:6;
    left: 281px;
    top: 327px;
    font-weight: bold;
a:link {
    color: #FFF;
a:hover {
    color: #F00;
#apDiv9 {
    position:absolute;
    width:200px;
    height:115px;
    z-index:6;
    left: 16px;
    top: 764px;
.maintext1 {    color: #FFF;
    font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif;
#apDiv10 {
    position:absolute;
    width:115px;
    height:36px;
    z-index:6;
    left: 831px;
    top: 716px;
    float: left;
#rightjust {
    text-align: right;
#apDiv11 {
    position:absolute;
    width:868px;
    height:53px;
    z-index:7;
    left: 77px;
    top: 214px;
    text-align: center;
</style>
What you need to do is add the bold part into this as per
<style type="text/css">
html {
    background-color: #000;
    height: 100%
body {
    width: 1000px;
    margin: auto;
    background: url(http://www.keystonemkg.com/Hampton.gif) no-repeat;
    height: 800px;
    position:relative;
    background-image: url(Hampton.gif);
.maintext {
    font-family: "Courier New", Courier, monospace;
#apDiv1 {
    position:absolute;
    width:174px;
    height:305px;
    z-index:1;
    left: 289px;
    top: 329px;
#apDiv2 {
    position:absolute;
    width:328px;
    height:449px;
    z-index:2;
    left: 138px;
    top: -49px;
#apDiv3 {
    position:absolute;
    width:137px;
    height:126px;
    z-index:2;
    left: 448px;
    top: 417px;
.infotext {
    font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif;
    color: #FFF;
siteinfo {
    font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif;
    font-weight: bold;
    color: #000;
.siteinfo {
    font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif;
    color: #000;
#apDiv4 {
    position:absolute;
    width:715px;
    height:22px;
    z-index:3;
    left: 253px;
    top: 804px;
#apDiv5 {
    position:absolute;
    width:170px;
    height:242px;
    z-index:4;
    left: 46px;
    top: 408px;
    text-align: center;
dropsha {
    border-top-style: solid;
    border-right-style: solid;
    border-bottom-style: solid;
    border-left-style: solid;
#apDiv6 {
    position:absolute;
    width:883px;
    height:62px;
    z-index:5;
    left: 71px;
    top: 141px;
    vertical-align: middle;
    text-align: center;
#apDiv7 {
    position:absolute;
    width:170px;
    height:69px;
    z-index:4;
    left: 51px;
    top: 710px;
    text-align: center;
#apDiv4 .infotext .siteinfo {
eventtext {
    font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif;
#apDiv8 {
    position:absolute;
    width:181px;
    height:27px;
    z-index:6;
    left: 281px;
    top: 327px;
    font-weight: bold;
a:link {
    color: #FFF;
a:hover {
    color: #F00;
#apDiv9 {
    position:absolute;
    width:200px;
    height:115px;
    z-index:6;
    left: 16px;
    top: 764px;
.maintext1 {    color: #FFF;
    font-family: Georgia, "Times New Roman", Times, serif;
#apDiv10 {
    position:absolute;
    width:115px;
    height:36px;
    z-index:6;
    left: 831px;
    top: 716px;
    float: left;
#apDiv10 img {
    float: left;
#rightjust {
    text-align: right;
#apDiv11 {
    position:absolute;
    width:868px;
    height:53px;
    z-index:7;
    left: 77px;
    top: 214px;
    text-align: center;
</style>
and remove the float: left that you placed in the meantime under #apDiv10
Gramps

Image appears different in Library and Develop modes?

I have an image that appears different depending on whether it is in the Library Module or the Develop Module. Only this one image does this. The develop module version is the one I want to work on in Photoshop. However, when I click on "Edit in Adobe Photoshop CS3" the resulting tiff that opens in PS has an appearance that matches that of the Library module version of the image. It makes no difference whether I click on "Edit in PS CS3" from the Library or Develop module, the tiff always matches the Library Module version of the raw file.
Any ideas what might be causing this?
Thanks.
J.

How are you calibrating your monitor? The only real difference between the Library and develop module is that the Library module shows a preview that is generally stored in the adobeRGB color space. The Develop module uses a color space based on prophotoRGB primaries and can encompass any color your camera can capture. It is possible that your green falls outside of adobeRGB and gets clipped in the library preview, while in the develop module it shows them. This is only possible to see if you have a wide gamut monitor, or when your calibration software generates a perceptual rendering intent. If you export and you do not use the prophotoRGB color space, you will loose these colors.

In Lightroom CC images look different in Library and Develop modules. After output, images do not appear as they do in Develop.

As above.

Mac OS X 10.9.5 has a color management bug that can lead to colors appearing different in Develop and Library: Jao's photo blog: Serious color management bug in Mac OS 10.9 "Mavericks" . See also: Jao's photo blog: Further quantification of the Mavericks color management problem and Jao's photo blog: Color management in Safari is broken in Mavericks too. Sorry for all the links to my blog, but this bug really annoys me and it bugs me that it hasn't been fixed all these months that Mavericks has been out. This can lead to color shifts especially in the deep tones. You can sometimes work around it by turning on soft proofing and proofing to adobeRGB or sRGB. Adobe could fix this but they haven't so far. Apple could fix it too, but they haven't until now. They fixed some code that lead to Aperture working correctly but Lightroom still has the problem.

Same image displaying differently in FF and IE6

This has me beaten
http://wrfinn.com/map_leros.html
(login/password fred) - the first image (I know it's out of
alignment...
later, later).
What is displaying in FF is the original image before the
circle/text was
added.
I have deleted it from the server and replaced it
(desperation as it's fine
in IE6) checked the scripts are there although I've tested it
without the
javascript with no better results. The DOM inspector is
showing an error on
the page in FF if this helps -
[Exception... "'Permission denied to get property
XULElement.accessKey' when
calling method: [nsIDOMXULLabelElement::accessKey]" nsresult:
"0x8057001e
(NS_ERROR_XPC_JS_THREW_STRING)" location: "JS frame ::
http://wrfinn.com/map_leros.html
:: jspw3 :: line 43" data: no]
<li><a href="#" class="p7PMtrg">About
Us</a>
Could somebody possibly throw some light on this?
Jo

josie1one wrote:
> This has me beaten
>
>
http://wrfinn.com/map_leros.html
> (login/password fred) - the first image (I know it's out
of alignment...
> later, later).
>
> What is displaying in FF is the original image before
the circle/text was
> added.
>
> I have deleted it from the server and replaced it
(desperation as it's fine
> in IE6) checked the scripts are there although I've
tested it without the
> javascript with no better results. The DOM inspector is
showing an error on
> the page in FF if this helps -
>
> [Exception... "'Permission denied to get property
XULElement.accessKey' when
> calling method: [nsIDOMXULLabelElement::accessKey]"
nsresult: "0x8057001e
> (NS_ERROR_XPC_JS_THREW_STRING)" location: "JS frame ::
>
http://wrfinn.com/map_leros.html
:: jspw3 :: line 43" data: no]
> <li><a href="#" class="p7PMtrg">About
Us</a>
>
> Could somebody possibly throw some light on this?
>
Hey Jo,
did you get this resolved? - I don't see the problems that
you are
describing nor do I get a dom inspector error.
The only thing I see is that the image which should reside
under the
side nav - you haven't set a path/source for this.
chin chin
Sinclair

Background image displays differently when published

I am using Captivate 5. I did a software simulation and in Captivate the background image is correct (the one on the left) but when i preview it or publish it and view in the browser the colors are off (second image) ..I tried to play around with the brightness/sharpness but it did nothing dramatic...any suggestions?
Hi,

Hi there
Generally speaking, Optimized ofen works well too. I'm unsure of the file size differences (if any) between the two settings. Because the image quality improves it would be logical to assume that the file size will increase.
Cheers... Rick
Helpful and Handy Links
Begin learning Captivate 5 moments from now! $29.95
Captivate Wish Form/Bug Reporting Form
Adobe Certified Captivate Training
SorcererStone Blog
Captivate eBooks

Using images in library view when file is missing

I have some images in the library but the file is missing. Can I somehow use the image displayed in the library view and export to disk for printing or e-mail? I’m using v4 on a Mac. Thanks.
Following on from the above I have downloaded the Extract previws help guide. http://helpx.adobe.com/lightroom/kb/extract-previews-lightroom-4.htmlThis runs a script to enable extracts to be made. After a bit of messing about with the process for choosing where to house the extracted files this works perfectly. It has certainly saved me a lot of pain and heartache.
Message was edited by: David Osmond
Message was edited by: David Osmond. Now closed.

Check whether the machine at school has correctly been updated to A§ 8.0.2. Several not so minor bugs were fixed with the updates. also check your files on Illustrator (Mac) and if necessary, re-save them from there.
Mylenium

Image layouts display differently in Safari than in Explorer

I have noticed that web page images display differently in Safari than in Explorer on a PC. On a PC, the web page may display three images side by side. In Safari, I might get two images side by side and the theid image below. Is there any correction for this? Thanks.
Norb

#sidebar_1 a:vistied {
color:#000;
is stating that all visited links in the #sidebar_1 div to be black. Are you saying that all visited links are black, outside the sidebar_1 div?
Jim

"Library" view does not show ALL photos

My "Library" view is not showing me the last 2 rolls I imported. If I click on the specific year views, I can see the photos, but I expect all photos are displayed in the "Library" view.
While still running iPhoto 5, I imported a roll of images from disk that included photos taken at the end of Dec 2005 and in Jan 2006. These are the photos that do not show in the "Library" view. This was happening with iPhoto 5 and is still happening with iPhoto 6.
Any suggestions for getting all photos to shwo in the "Library" view ?
Thanks,
Eliot

Thanks -- I figured out my problem...
Since iPhoto now seems to group items into "rolls", I had imported images from several different dates. The first image was from Sep'05, so it placed ALL the images imported, even those from Jan'06, with the Sep'05 photo in the middle of of my "Library" view.
Is there a way to have the "Library" view sort in date order instead of by imported roll ?
Thanks,
Eliot

Different view to develop and library module

Hello everyone, I have a big problem during my workflow, or when working images from the development at the end of the work as the images are like me and very sharp. But when I see in the library module are not sharp and the blacks are very mordibi. Below I post the link to see for yourself.
MODULE DEVELOPMENT:
MODULE LIBRARY:
The problem is that when I export my image is identical to the form LIBRARY and not that beautiful clear form DEVELOPMENT. So I find myself not export images with crisp blacks and dishes.
I already tried to delete the cache, but does not change anything, and I use 1:1 previews, you have no idea how to fix my problem?

twenty_one wrote:
Ah, now I see the rightside of that screenshot, with, as you say, sharpening 150 and NR 0. That's a combo it would never even occur to me to use, not in a hundred years...
Anyway, I tried this with an ISO 1250 shot, but couldn't see any differences anywhere. But maybe you need to go higher.
I've learned to never take anything for granted when reviewing LR forum posts. An ISO 1250 shot is probably too low with most DSLR cameras to see this issue. On my 5D MKII I could really only see the "lightening" between Develop and Library views with ISO 6400 raw images. It may also show up at lower ISO settings with images that are heavily underexposed (i.e. LR Exposure +1 and greater), and with smaller sensor cameras (1.6 crop, P&S).
Gianlu24, keep in mind that Adobe increased the Sharpening amount from '100' in LR3 to '150' in LR4 when using a high 'Masking' setting. For most normal images and Masking settings you should use a Sharpening amount below '100.' There are two basic types–Capture and Output sharpening, each adjusted using separate controls. In addition you can apply both Global and Local Capture Sharpening in LR. These three articles by Laura Shoe may be helpful:
http://laurashoe.com/2011/08/21/sharpening-in-lightroom-part-one-overview-and-capture-shar pening/
http://laurashoe.com/2011/09/27/creative-sharpening-in-lightroom-sharpen-eyes/
http://laurashoe.com/2012/07/11/sharpening-in-lightroom-part-three-output-sharpening/

Have trial version of lightroom images display in library and 'before' in developer, but can't display full image to develop. Shows as a blue box with a white X on it.

I have downloaded and installed Lightroom for a 30 day trial. Library works fine, but when I try to edit images in Develop, I can't see the full size image just a blue box with a white X on it. If I switch on to Before & After mode, the image displays fine in the before, but still just blue box in the 'after'. Can't find any answer to this anywhere! Please help as my trial days are running out.

Lightroom CC - blue box in develop module

Images displaying differently in Library view to Develop - also affecting Exports

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for