Images edited on Mac look like crap on PC (Windows). Why is this?

HELLO, ARABIA HERE...
I'M USING A MAC 10.4.11 AND PHOTO SHOP CS TO RETOUCH PHOTOS FOR MY NEW PHOTOGRAPHY BUSINESS, THE FINISH PHOTOS LOOK BEAUTIFUL ON MY MAC...,BUT WHEN I SAVE THEM TO A DISK AND VIEW THEM ON A PC THAT'S RUNNING WINDOWS,THEY LOOK AWFUL?
WHY IS THIS HAPPENING?
I SAVE THEM AS JPEG... SO I DON'T REALLY GET WHAT IS HAPPENING TO CHANGE THE PHOTOS SO DRASTICALLY .
IS THERE SOME CONVERSION HAPPENING THAT I'M NOT AWARE OF ?
OR IS THERE A STEP THAT I'M SUPPOSED TO DO WHEN SAVING TO A CD.
I MEAN IT'S NOT A SUBTLE CHANGE IT'S AS IF SOME ON THE STEPS I TOOK TO GET THE IMAGE THE WAY I WANT IT , ARE DELETED OR SOMETHING.
SO THANKS IN ADVANCE!

Ann's absolutely right, Arabia.
Save your jpegs to the sRGB colour space. Adobe RGB is best if you are looking to print a faithful, good quality reproduction of what you are seeing on your screen ( provided you have a decently calibrated monitor ). sRGB is commonly used for images that will be most often used on the web. If you haven't calibrated and want to have some idea of the difference between most uncalibrated screens and a calibrated one, go to System Preferences -> Displays -> Color -> Calibrate and let the Mac lead you through it's own calibration routine. Use Gamma 2.2 ( 1.8 is no longer widely used for Macs ) and use your own judgement when doing the adjustments. Give your finished calibration a name and then use that one , until such time as you feel you should be using a calibration tool to do it for you.
All things being equal , your monitor should appear darker than at present. Your editing will then be influenced by the darker image that you see. This is a good thing , as most monitors are set way too bright.
Let us know how you get on.
Kind regards,
David.

Similar Messages

  • Best way to make a logo that doesn't look like crap on big screens/phones?

    I am working on creating a simple text logo that fits in a 110x300 pixel space for a website. The thing is, at this small resolution, it looks pretty crappy using Photoshop. So, I tried Illustrator because I believe you can save vectors with it (I'm new to all this). From what I know, vectors don't lose quality when zoomed in (or on big screens). However, I have no clue what I'm doing. I tried to "save for web" a logo as a png 24, and it still looks like crap. Am I doing something wrong, or is it just not possible to save a high quality image at that size?

    So, there is no way to save a vector image for a website?
    SVG. Flash. HTML5 canvas objects (JavaScript).
    That was what SVG was really made for, but it never found widespread use.
    That's a pretty broad-based (and misleading) dismissal.
    Use of SVG is increasing, not declining, and practically all current browsers now support it. So with such a statement, you would need to quantify "widespread". Of course SVG (like Flash and canvas) is and probably always will be less common than raster formats, but that's always been true of vector-based graphics in general, even in print. Less "widespread" use of something superior is an advantage to those who employ it. Sites which employ it effectively can be more engaging and dynamic than the far more "widespread" ones which don't. That's the whole point.
    Fonts are also vector-based graphics and are certainly pretty "widespread" in use on the web. (Consider the potential of this in the light of things like font embedding and GoogleFonts.)
    From what I know, vectors don't lose quality when zoomed in (or on big screens).
    Stallone, your question is really more a matter of the platforms / browsers you are targeting. You have to be aware of what kind of zooming you are talking about and what is happening on what you're referring to as "big screens."
    For example, you can easily launch Inkscape, create an SVG graphic consisting entirely of vector paths, and include it in a static web page. It will be displayed and rasterized on-the-fly by the local machine, as vector graphics are intended to do. But now, who or what is going to "zoom" it? Are you talking about mere screen "magnification" by the sight impaired in which the whole page is zoomed? Are you talking about pinch zooming on mobile devices in which the whole page is zoomed? Are you talking about projecting on the conference room screen in which nothing is actually zoomed (re-rasterized) at all?
    Everything that anybody views on a computer monitor is a raster image, because the monitor itself is a raster imaging device. That's even true of vector paths you draw and view in programs like Illustrator. Vector-based graphics get re-rasterized on the fly--so long as the system in which they are being printed/viewed is capable of supporting that. The question boils down to when the rasterization occurs and what is doing the zooming.
    Historically, web browsers don't do that. The "intelligence" (programming) involved in rasterizing vector paths on the fly has to be effectively "embedded" in the graphic or in an add-on program (browser plug in) which performs the re-rasterization locally on the viewer's machine. That's why Flash requires a plug-in and SVG has to be viewed in a browser that understands the XML upon which it's based (which most current browsers nowadays do) and HTML5 Canvas has to viewed in browsers which can run its JavaScript-like programming (which is still developing).
    All this is constantly changing as mobile devices and platforms and ebooks proliferate, and all this is why designing for the web always entails some amount of experimentation on the platform(s) for which you are developing.
    It's a big subject; not something you can get a crash course on in a forum like this.
    JET

  • DVDs I burn look like crap. Quality is horrible, but looks great in iMovie.

    So I have a few movies I have put together in iMovie. One was imported using an HD camera, one from MiniDV. I have made edited movies of this footage, some adding text and what not, and some just raw footage. When I have exported these movies to YouTube or just Quicktime files to be emailed or posted on the web, they look great, like normal. When I burn them to DVD using iDVD, when played back on the regular TV or on another computer, the footage looks like crap, even though the animated menus look great.
    I export the movie using the Media Browser, in Large format, and load them into iDVD that way. When I play the file in iDVD, it still looks great. The only time it looks bad is when the DVD is burned. The footage looks as though it has a "slow shutter" effect on it. The quality is crap, and the footage looks like it's gone through generation loss, uploaded to YouTube then re-burned to a DVD.
    Why is this happening?

    I also have this problem and am trying to find a solution.
    I shoot 1080i on a sony hd cam (minidv), then import and edit in FC Express using the apple intermediate codec 1080i60 and export to QT as a NON-independent file using same settings. The final movie file is 1920x1080 which is dragged into iDVD '08 and burned at "professional quality".
    When I burn to dvd and play on my flatscreen in an sd dvd player, it looks like crap, even down to large pixelations around the text. I know not to expect HD but the SD should look better than this.
    Now, when I play this in my macbook's dvd player, it looks better than the tv. But this is played at actual size which is only about 1/4 of my screen whose resolution is 1920x1200. I will select the "actual size" mode on the dvd controls. So why is iDVD making a 1080 movie to a ~400 movie?
    ANy suggestions are appreciated and if anyone knows if DVD Studio Pro will solve this.
    Aloha:
    -Charlie-

  • Flash Looks Like Crap

    I republished the swf as stated to me in another section and
    it looked like crap. The file looks like a layer is missing or
    something, I started from scratch(as in how it was origianlly in
    the template). Any quick tips on how to edit flash templates? Edit
    as far as changint the text on buttons and in the "logo panel"
    area.
    [Started another topic because it's more of a design question
    now]

    if you just want to change the text on the buttons, go to
    your Library (Ctrl-L if you don't have it open) and double click
    the button you want to edit. once you do, you will be able to edit
    most aspects of the button, including the text. hope this is what
    you're asking help on....and...hope it helps.

  • How do i create an image in PSE11 to look like a negative strip?

    How do i create an image in PSE11 to look like a negative strip? I have been able to do this in the past in older PSE but i cannot find the option in this version.

    This is not the "PSE" forum.
    You want the Ps Elements forum across the hall:
    http://forums.adobe.com/community/photoshop_elements

  • Exported movie looks like crap

    I exported a 1080p home movie from iMove HD and it looks like garbage, pixelated and everything. The way I did this was: Share > Export using QuickTime. Then in the Options area I clicked on Size and selected 1920 x 1080.
    After nearly 3 hours of export time, and a nearly 1 GB file size, it looked like crap.
    So I tried it again, this time trying 1280 x 720, and it looked MARGINALLY better, but still not HD looking. What could be the problem?

    I exported a 1080p home movie from iMove HD and it looks like garbage, pixelated and everything. The way I did this was: Share > Export using QuickTime. Then in the Options area I clicked on Size and selected 1920 x 1080. After nearly 3 hours of export time, and a nearly 1 GB file size, it looked like crap.
    When you shared as "Export using QuickTime", did you then select the Export option "Movie to QuickTime Movie" and if so what Settings, for example, Apple Intermediate Codec, H.264, MPEG-4 Video or other. Perhaps you selected the Export option "Movie to MPEG-4" - not "Movie to QuickTime Movie". We need more details as to your Export options and format settings - there are many to choose from. Just saying that you used "Export using QuickTime" doesn't provide enough information unfortunately.
    One critical consideration when exporting using QuickTime is the _Data Rate_. If this is set too low (when the option is presented) you will get poor results - "crap" as you say! I would suggest starting at a minimum of 5000 kbits/sec (5 megabits per second) and moving up from there until you see the quality you are seeking.
    Anyway, if you are still there, please provide more information about your settings - particularly regarding the format (codec) and data rate if possible.
    John

  • 876948422.js is a remote file and cannot be edited. [close] looks like a link.

    I need a Dreamweaver CS4 Sharpshooter's help:
    I'm having an issue on the last two site files I have opened and it driving my crazy. I'm getting the yellow hilighted warning message. I open a file and where it states Source Code I get a numbers for example: 876948422.js then in the yellow highlighted it states: 876948422.js is a remote file and cannot be edited. [close] and this close looks like a clickable link.
    I seen this on the first file last Friday and I freaked out because I have heard of bandits stealing traffic and comissions from affiliates and I though someone hi-jacked my page and was stealing my stuff because I have gotten zero results from all my sites with this style email Opin page while Google tracking software has been showing atleast a little activity on these sites.
    So every web site that used that email Opin page I completely deleted. I even deleted them from my testing server on my local machine. I don't know if there is any software out there that can clean my machine of this kind of intruduer if that is what it is.
    Now I just opened another file which I took into Dreamweaver. I copied all the code and did a paste and this file has the js file as well. What is going on here..... help!!!
    It has the same file type with warning has someone completely taken over my machine through Dreamweaver or...
    I took a screen shot in paint and pasted it below... Please help....

    See my reply to your other post.  Please don't double post like this.
    http://forums.adobe.com/message/4002393#4002393

  • How do I get photoshop to open with a plain gray backdrop on a Mac? Like it does with Windows.

    How do I get photoshop to open with a plain gray backdrop on a Mac? Like it does with Windows.

    What version of photoshop are you using?
    On newer versions of photoshop cs4-cc, it's usually Window>Application Frame

  • I have an Iphone 4s and i can't make a connection to my mac and other devices via bluetooth! Why is this a problem and how can i repair it?

    I have an Iphone 4s and i can't make a connection to my mac and other devices via bluetooth! Why is this a problem and how can i repair it?

    "I have an Iphone 4s and i can't make a connection to my mac and other devices via bluetooth! ":
    That is correct.
    "Why is this a problem and how can i repair it?"
    Becasue this has never been a feature of iphone/ipod/ipad.  There is nothing to repair.

  • After purchasing the Photoshop cs6 update for my Mac, the download page says for "Windows". Will this still work? How do I get the right download without purchasing again

    After purchasing the Photoshop cs6 update for my Mac, the download page says for "Windows". Will this still work? How do I get the right download without purchasing again?

    no.
    you need the update for a mac, not windows.
    Product updates

  • Idvd 09 - preview looks awsome, burned dvd looks like crap on a stick!

    What is going on with idvd???
    1. I use a Panasonic HD digital camcorder that saves video in 1080p x 720p and looks spectacular veiwed directly from camcorder to TV.
    2. I import the video files into imovie 09 and quality still looks great. (I realize my monitor won't display video at it's highest resolution.)
    3. I edit the video and as the text and transitions are added the playback gets choppy and starts to freeze. -Whatever!
    4. I "share" the final vid to media browser.
    5. I create a DVD menu in iDVD 09 and import the video from the media/movies panel.
    Preview looks great, runs fairly smooth. ok!
    6. I burn to a DVD-R using the Best Performance setting.
    7. I place the burned DVD into my dvd player and....
    It now looks like I am projecting the video onto a brick wall with the focus out of adjustment. The video is not very smooth, with jittery motion! And the resolution mimics that of an old Sega Game Gear view screen! Text has video noise distortion all around it. Probably would look better on youtube! AND....If I select "Scene selection" option and choose a scene from the middle of the movie, it just plays from the start anyway!
    So much for HD! So much for deadlines! Now I just want to know why I "upgraded" to iLife 09 and a new-found crappy quality!! "Hollywood style movies" - MY BUTT!!!!!
    Please help!!!!!!
    Message was edited by: Jerred Best
    Message was edited by: Jerred Best

    Hi Jerred,
    Welcome to apple discussions. I have some bad news and some good news for you. I'll start with the bad news.
    iDVD does Not support burning High Def DVD (even though iMovie will in fact edit HD). That's the bad news.
    The good news is that there are third party options available to you at a relatively low cost (under $120).
    See here: http://www.roxio.com/
    OK. I told you the bad news and the good news right? Well here's the frosting on the cake:
    You DON'T need a BD burner if you're doing this on the cheap (like most of us). A standard DVD burner such as your Mac's superdrive will do fine.
    See here: http://www.macvideo.tv/dvd-authoring/features/index.cfm?articleId=112361
    Btw, you do want to make certain your camcorder/ camera is listed below prior to proceeding with the above info:
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT3290?viewlocale=en_US
    Hope the above info helps but if not just come on back.
    Disclaimer: Apple does not necessarily endorse any suggestions, solutions, or third-party software / products that may be mentioned in this topic. Apple encourages you to first seek a solution at Apple Support. The following links are provided as is, with no guarantee of the effectiveness or reliability of the information. Apple does not guarantee that these links will be maintained or functional at any given time. Use the information above at your own discretion.
    Message was edited by: SDMacuser

  • Security - pop up ads coming up on my mac - looking like it's mac security

    Hello, pop up ads coming up on my mac -
    For the first time in 4 years, My mac is getting ads (looking like mac windows) for 'anti'malware' and ads (looking like mac) saying that I have viruses and to download to erase them. I have seen this twice this week. It is NOT from mac protection (although it looks like your computer and HD). This is happening in firefox - what can I do to block this??? (i already have blocked suspicious sites, etc)?
    I called Mac - they said this is malicious software and has been happening in the last 2 weeks - to not download anything (which I hadn't) and that they ask for a credit card number and download possible viruses.
    I changed something in my system preferences in safari - but use firefox usually - is there anything I can do in safari to not get these??

    On my iMac, I opened Safari -> Preferences -> General and unchecked ''Open “safe” files after downloading'' to protect against the recently reported "Bogus MacDefender malware".<br>
    Ref: <br>
    http://thenextweb.com/apple/2011/05/02/bogus-macdefender-malware-campaign-targets-mac-users-using-google-images/
    Firefox would not automatically open a downloaded file that could start a software installation, as far as I know. The file would be saved and you would need to open it manually, as a Firefox user mentioned here:
    http://www.mac-forums.com/forums/apple-rumors-reports/237155-macdefender-malware-targeting-mac-users.html
    You can do other things to keep safe online with Firefox, such as making sure all your plugins are up to date by visiting www.mozilla.com/plugincheck/ and disable any plugins in Firefox that you aren't using, via "Tools -> Add-ons -> Plugins" . See [[Troubleshooting plugins]] for more info.
    If you already installed the malware, the [http://thenextweb.com/apple/2011/05/02/bogus-macdefender-malware-campaign-targets-mac-users-using-google-images/ first link I posted] explains how to remove it, which I've copied below.
    Luckily, disabling and removing the bogus MacDefender application is easy. If you have been infected and want to make sure it no longer resides on your system, follow the steps below:
    #To ensure you do not automatically download the app, uncheck the following: Safari > Preferences > General > uncheck “Open “safe” files after downloading”.
    #Searching for the application and deleting it directly may fail, saying the app is in use. To stop it running, check Activity Monitor (in Applications > Utilities) and disable anything that relates to MacDefender.
    #Look in /Library/StartupItems and, same place, LaunchAgents and LaunchDaemons for references to the malware app.
    #Once quit, head to the Applications folder and drag the MacDefender app to the trash, then delete trash.
    #To ensure all references to the app are cleared, run a search using Spotlight and delete all MacDefender references you find.
    The removal of the app is somewhat easier than on Windows, mainly thanks to the security of the Mac OS X operating system. The malware looks to proliferating off the back of attacks on websites that are serving images on Google Images – it is recommended that you browse safely, utilising other image searches for the time being.
    If you feel uncomfortable following these instructions, you should visit Apple Support or the Apple discussion forum, where I found many related threads about this malware, including https://discussions.apple.com/thread/3029144

  • Query re Photoshop interface - can PS on Mac look like PS on Windows?

    Hi all,
    For various reasons I've just switched to the Mac platform after many years using Windows.
    I've become very used to Photoshop being 'full screen' i.e. a toolbar at the top of a window that isn't transparent - I can't see the desktop background through the Photoshop window.
    On Mac, however, Photoshop is a toolbar at the top and my desktop background and other applications are visible when Photoshop has focus.
    Is there a way of configuring Photoshop so that it looks the same as Windows?
    Please don't take offense that I want it to look this way - I have no allegiance to either Windows or OS X but I do like the way I'm used to working.
    Thanks in advance for any help.
    - Chris

    Ever since I started using CS4 I don't see a difference between the two other than the grey workspace background in Windows. If I want that too, I use the application frame as described above.
    I'm back and forth between Mac and Windows all day. Using identical 23" monitors in separate rooms. as long as I have enough screen to work with, I'm happy.

  • Plugging Macbook Pro i7 into external displays looks like crap.

    I have a rather confusing problem with my Macbook Pro. I went out and bought a Samsung 27" display. I am running a generic no-name adapter from the mini port to a HDMI plug into the display. The quality was AWFUL- as in basically unusable. I returned the monitor and came back a few weeks later with the laptop to the store. I spent about an hour plugging the laptop into various monitors throughout the store. Almost all of the monitors- including smaller 24" monitors- looked like crud also except for the upper end models from HP and of course- the $1,000 model from Apple. I wound up buying a 27" HP 2710m monitor. It looked "ok" in the store. I work as a graphic designer so I'm very picky about details. Upon opening a Photoshop doc I could see that things like gradients, shadows, and text all looked funky and wrong. Thus again- the monitor I bought looks like #$@!.
    What's weird is that if I take a look at the display settings when its not plugged into a monitor there is a huge amount to choose from. When its plugged into any monitor I've tried- except of course the super expensive Apple display- about half of those setting become unavailble and I'm basically stuck with using what appears to be TV settings ( 1080P) and so on.
    I tested the new monitor on a Mac Tower and it seems to do fine. But then again- it looks like crud with the Laptop. The Mac tower uses non-apple 24" displays and they look great. I even plugged the laptop into one of these 24" displays currently used for the tower and again- SAME thing!
    So basically I've got a $2,000 laptop that appears to ONLY work with an Apple monitor. Is there something stupid I'm simply not getting here or what? I realize those apple displays are a much higher pixel density, but still- the generic 24" displays work with the Mac tower but NOT with the laptop.

    Welcome to Apple Discussions!
    If you have an i7, it can't be running 10.5.4 reliably. At minimum it can run 10.6.3. So that might be part of the problem if you managed to to load an older operating system on the Mac than the Mac itself can handle. Your My Settings or posted OS link has 10.5.4, even though you are using an i7. If you meant to select 10.6.4, pardon me.
    Generic adapters are usually not as reliable as quality adapters, but also if you have 1080p display, I recommend checking your progressive setting under Apple menu -> System Preferences -> Displays Options.
    I'm assuming you tried the same cables on the desktop as the notebook. If you don't have a mini-Displayport connection on the desktop to test with, you can't rule out the cables.
    http://www.macsales.com/ offers several adapters you can use with your notebook for HDMI. You might want to check with them, or find a non-generic adapter.

  • My mpeg-4 looks like crap

    i was uploading to vimeo, exporting from a final cut pro hd 4.5 file using quicktime 7.6.6 conversion, here's the link to the settings i used:
    http://vimeo.com/help/compression
    any advice would be much appreciated!

    any advice would be much appreciated!
    How about posting a link to the QT v7.6.6 output file so we can see what the actual quality of your source content looked like and what results were actually achieved using your targeted settings.

Maybe you are looking for