IMAP client retrieves garbage

The problem persists in any of the 2 cases - whether we use GWIA IMAP or POA IMAP. The GW version is 7.0.2.
A groupwise user sends a message to another groupwise user by means of groupwise client (7.0.2). Let the text of the message be 2 lines, the 1st consists of all Russian capital letters, the 2nd contains all Russian small letters. The recipient uses an IMAP client, e.g. Mozilla Thunderbird. He retrieves the message with the following source code:
From - Tue Dec 18 12:02:29 2007
X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: GroupWise 7.0.2
Subject: Russian Aphabet
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 12:02:07 +0200
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]>
<[email protected]> <[email protected]>
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
From: "E.V. Suprun" <[email protected]>
To: "User Test" <[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
=D0=82=D0=83=E2=80=9A=D1=93=E2=80=9E=E2=80=A6=E2=8 0=A0=E2=80=A1=E2=82=AC=E2=
=80=B0=D0=89=E2=80=B9=D0=8A=D0=8C=D0=8B=D0=8F=D1=9 2=E2=80=98=E2=80=99=E2=80=
=9C=E2=80=9D=E2=97=8F=E2=80=93=E2=80=94 =E2=84=A2=D1=99=E2=80=BA=D1=9A=D1=
=9C=D1=9B=D1=9F
=D0=81=D0=82=D0=83=D0=84=D0=85=D0=86=D0=87=D0=88=D 0=89=D0=8A=D0=8B=D0=8C-=
=D0=8E=D0=8F=D1=80=D1=81=D1=82=D1=83=D1=84=D1=85=D 1=86=D1=87=D1=88=D1=89=D1=
=8A=D1=8B=D1=8C=D1=8D=D1=8E=D1=8F
That quoted-printable text is a garbage. The text should be like this:
=D0=90=D0=91=D0=92=D0=93=D0=94=D0=95=D0=96=D0=97=D 0=98=D0=99=D0=9A=D0=9B=D0=
=9C=D0=9D=D0=9E=D0=9F=D0=A0=D0=A1=D0=A2=D0=A3=D0=A 4=D0=A5=D0=A6=D0=A7=D0=A8=
=D0=A9=D0=AA=D0=AB=D0=AC=D0=AD=D0=AE=D0=AF
=D0=B0=D0=B1=D0=B2=D0=B3=D0=B4=D0=B5=D0=B6=D0=B7=D 0=B8=D0=B9=D0=BA=D0=BB=D0=
=BC=D0=BD=D0=BE=D0=BF=D1=80=D1=81=D1=82=D1=83=D1=8 4=D1=85=D1=86=D1=87=D1=88=
=D1=89=D1=8A=D1=8B=D1=8C=D1=8D=D1=8E=D1=8F
I used ASCII characters in the Subject field, so it is readable, but if the groupwise sender types a Russian subject, the IMAP recipient gets a garbage subject too.
Is it a bug? Or are there settings to avoid that behaviour?
There is no problem If the sender has "Windows default" as the setting of "Send Mime Encoding" in his groupwise client. The default is UTF-8, and the problem applies to that setting of the sending GW client.
Regards, Eugene

Open an SR, report the bug, get it refunded.
Eugene Suprun wrote:
> The problem persists in any of the 2 cases - whether we use GWIA IMAP or POA IMAP. The GW version is 7.0.2.
>
> A groupwise user sends a message to another groupwise user by means of groupwise client (7.0.2). Let the text of the message be 2 lines, the 1st consists of all Russian capital letters, the 2nd contains all Russian small letters. The recipient uses an IMAP client, e.g. Mozilla Thunderbird. He retrieves the message with the following source code:
>
> From - Tue Dec 18 12:02:29 2007
> X-Mozilla-Status: 0001
> X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> X-Mailer: GroupWise 7.0.2
> Subject: Russian Aphabet
> Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2007 12:02:07 +0200
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> References: <[email protected]>
> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
> In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
> From: "E.V. Suprun" <[email protected]>
> To: "User Test" <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> Content-Disposition: inline
>
> =D0=82=D0=83=E2=80=9A=D1=93=E2=80=9E=E2=80=A6=E2=8 0=A0=E2=80=A1=E2=82=AC=E2=
> =80=B0=D0=89=E2=80=B9=D0=8A=D0=8C=D0=8B=D0=8F=D1=9 2=E2=80=98=E2=80=99=E2=80=
> =9C=E2=80=9D=E2=97=8F=E2=80=93=E2=80=94 =E2=84=A2=D1=99=E2=80=BA=D1=9A=D1=
> =9C=D1=9B=D1=9F
> =D0=81=D0=82=D0=83=D0=84=D0=85=D0=86=D0=87=D0=88=D 0=89=D0=8A=D0=8B=D0=8C-=
> =D0=8E=D0=8F=D1=80=D1=81=D1=82=D1=83=D1=84=D1=85=D 1=86=D1=87=D1=88=D1=89=D1=
> =8A=D1=8B=D1=8C=D1=8D=D1=8E=D1=8F
>
> That quoted-printable text is a garbage. The text should be like this:
>
> =D0=90=D0=91=D0=92=D0=93=D0=94=D0=95=D0=96=D0=97=D 0=98=D0=99=D0=9A=D0=9B=D0=
> =9C=D0=9D=D0=9E=D0=9F=D0=A0=D0=A1=D0=A2=D0=A3=D0=A 4=D0=A5=D0=A6=D0=A7=D0=A8=
> =D0=A9=D0=AA=D0=AB=D0=AC=D0=AD=D0=AE=D0=AF
> =D0=B0=D0=B1=D0=B2=D0=B3=D0=B4=D0=B5=D0=B6=D0=B7=D 0=B8=D0=B9=D0=BA=D0=BB=D0=
> =BC=D0=BD=D0=BE=D0=BF=D1=80=D1=81=D1=82=D1=83=D1=8 4=D1=85=D1=86=D1=87=D1=88=
> =D1=89=D1=8A=D1=8B=D1=8C=D1=8D=D1=8E=D1=8F
>
> I used ASCII characters in the Subject field, so it is readable, but if the groupwise sender types a Russian subject, the IMAP recipient gets a garbage subject too.
>
> Is it a bug? Or are there settings to avoid that behaviour?
>
> There is no problem If the sender has "Windows default" as the setting of "Send Mime Encoding" in his groupwise client. The default is UTF-8, and the problem applies to that setting of the sending GW client.
>
> Regards, Eugene

Similar Messages

  • Unity Connection 8.x and Novell GroupWise IMAP client.

    Hi,
    Unity Connection 8.x clusters, the customer is using Novell Groupwise for email message store. We would like to setup GroupWise IMAP for them.
    However one of the customer's restrictions is that they locked down the end-users computers so that Unity Connection message can not be downloaded into end-user's local PC.
    I understand that on Unity Connection COS we can setup the option end-user can only access message header, but they have to dial-in the main-pilot number to retrieve message or use web-inbox tool.
    (1) Is there any way for us to setup the IMAP, so that end-user retrieve message while the message is still in centralized Unity Connection server?
    (2) If option (1) is not possible, can we setup the message folder of IMAP client to a network shared drive such as H, M drive instead of default local drive?
    (3) Any other solution or workaround?
    Thanks,
    JJ

    See sample depiction below of applications and physical core usage on a server with 2 CPUs and 8 total physical cores. In white is the reservation of one physical core.
    Regards.

  • No Attachments with IMAP Client

    We are having an intermittent issue where we cannot see attachments using an IMAP client. I thought this might've been a NotifyLink issue, but we still have the problem when using Thunderbird via IMAP. I saw some other threads about missing attachments with IMAP, but I did not see any addressing GW8.0.2, which we have across the board. Any ideas on how to correct? If I missed a thread that addresses this, please point me to it.
    Thanks,
    -Jason

    Jasonpgutierrez,
    It appears that in the past few days you have not received a response to your
    posting. That concerns us, and has triggered this automated reply.
    Has your problem been resolved? If not, you might try one of the following options:
    - Visit http://support.novell.com and search the knowledgebase and/or check all
    the other self support options and support programs available.
    - You could also try posting your message again. Make sure it is posted in the
    correct newsgroup. (http://forums.novell.com)
    Be sure to read the forum FAQ about what to expect in the way of responses:
    http://forums.novell.com/faq.php
    If this is a reply to a duplicate posting, please ignore and accept our apologies
    and rest assured we will issue a stern reprimand to our posting bot.
    Good luck!
    Your Novell Product Support Forums Team
    http://forums.novell.com/

  • IMAP client, delete mail problems

    Hello all,
    I am on GW2012 and for a while now I have been having this problem.
    Anyone, whether using Apple, Android or any other device/client, that connects to the 2012 GWIA to check mail, if they delete a piece of mail, it is simply striked through and not deleted. It will look deleted on the IMAP client/device, but when one looks at the full client or web client, the email that should have been deleted only has a strike all the way through it. It never deleted until it gets deleted in the full or web client.
    Is there a setting somewhere in GroupWise that is causing this to happen?
    Tom

    cafetom,
    It appears that in the past few days you have not received a response to your
    posting. That concerns us, and has triggered this automated reply.
    Has your problem been resolved? If not, you might try one of the following options:
    - Visit http://support.novell.com and search the knowledgebase and/or check all
    the other self support options and support programs available.
    - You could also try posting your message again. Make sure it is posted in the
    correct newsgroup. (http://forums.novell.com)
    Be sure to read the forum FAQ about what to expect in the way of responses:
    http://forums.novell.com/faq.php
    If this is a reply to a duplicate posting, please ignore and accept our apologies
    and rest assured we will issue a stern reprimand to our posting bot.
    Good luck!
    Your Novell Product Support Forums Team
    http://forums.novell.com/

  • Cisco Unity Connection. TLS for IMAP client connections

    Hello!
    I have CUCM 8.6.2.21900-5, CUC 8.6.2ES44.22900-44, CUP version: 8.6.3.10000-20, CUPC version: 8.6.2.20563-1.1.140
    Now CUPC successfully connect to mailstore by IMAP. But I want to configure Transport Layer Security for IMAP client connections in order to protect user passwords.
    I have read these guides:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6509/products_configuration_example09186a0080b94d12.shtml
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/voice_ip_comm/connection/8x/administration/guide/8xcucsag175.html
    Problem is that CUC doesn't listen port 993 (see attachment), so i cant configure CUPC to connect by TLS. I have tried to configure CUPC connect to port 143 by TLS or SSL. CUPC successfully work and indicate that it use TLS, but it transfer password to CUC as plain text!
    So how I can enable IMAP over TLS in CUC?
    Thanks in advance!

    Hello!
    Problem is unresolved. I have read your article.
    Check the
    Allow Users to Use Unified Client to Access Voice Mail box. This allows access to port 7993 and TLS for the CUPC >> client support.
    Check the
    Allow Users to Use Unified Client to Access Voice Mail box. This allows access to port 7993 and TLS for the CUPC client support.
    CUC doesn't listen port 7993 or 993
    I have tried CUPC 8.6.3

  • GWIA IMAP Client Limits?

    What is the max IMAP clients an admin should allow to hit a single GWIA
    gataway using default threads?
    I'm having serious abend issues and have narrowed it down to IMAP clients
    hitting my GWIA, I getting colored debugging screen on my Netware 6.5 server
    that I have never ever seen in 25+ years in working with Netware.
    I "guess" I'm going call Novell since the only way to keep my GWIA up is to
    disable IMAP but I'm not sure what's worse, talking to front line Novell
    support or listening to my user tomorrow morning complain that that their
    fancy dancy iPhones can't get email.

    Oh I was just grasping a straws, I have a ton of word of mouth iPhone users
    that they passed the email IMAP & SMTP addresses around and without having
    predefined limits on GWIA of who could or couldn't access it, suddenly I
    have several hundred IMAP users along with over hundred moblity users.
    I running test code from Novell to address the SOAP thread issues which
    seems to work, problem was in that first release of this test code, there
    appear to a GWIA IMAP bug, newest test code seems to fix the GWIA now, I'm
    running 3 days now without an crash and SOAP is behaving ok.
    "Peter Schwindt" <[email protected]> wrote in message
    news:ogCVo.10869$[email protected]. .
    > On 01/07/11 03:18, Michael Rae wrote:
    >
    >> I "guess" I'm going call Novell since the only way to keep my GWIA up is
    >> to
    >> disable IMAP but I'm not sure what's worse, talking to front line Novell
    >> support or listening to my user tomorrow morning complain that that their
    >> fancy dancy iPhones can't get email.
    >
    > Why not set-up Mobility and have them leave your IMAP for "normal"
    > users? ;-)
    >
    > Peter

  • Email Sender's display name not displaying/resolving on internal emails with POP/IMAP clients

    Here's the scenario. I have two 2013 test accounts setup in Outlook as POP/SMTP accounts. I have their name setup as initials in the outlook account (the "Your Name" field).  If I send an email (Through SMTP) to a 2013 Exchange(Outlook
    Anywhere) client, their names resolve to their actual Display Name in the GAL which is correct.  Now if I send an email to another 2013 POP/IMAP user, their name shows what is setup in Outlook which is their initials which is not correct.
    Now we are currently in the process of a 2007 to 2013 migration.  I do not see this behavior on the Exchange 2007 side with POP/IMAP clients.  If I run the same test setup with a 2007 mailbox as the recipient, the sender's name resolves to
    their GAL display name and NOT the name configured in the Outlook Account settings.  It doesn't matter whether the sender is a 2007 or 2013 account.  As long as the recipient is on 2007 it works fine.
    This is all tested using authenticated SMTP.  The only difference I can tell is that the 2007 servers resolve the name before delivering it to the inbox where the 2013 servers don't.
    There aren't any GAL or Address Book related issues on the 2013 side.  Full exchange clients or OWA work correctly.

    Hi,
    It seems to be related to the permission settings on the receive connector. For example, using a Receive Connector for Anonymous Relay. We can refer to this article:
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa996395(v=exchg.141).aspx
    And we can use the tool Dsacls to check the permissions:
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc771151(v=ws.10).aspx
    Receive Connector Permissions
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj673053(v=exchg.150).aspx

  • Outlook IMAP client authen to CUCMBE-UC with LDAP/AD integration

    I have a CUCME 7.1(3). instlallation which is integrated into AD's LDAP for user population and authentication.  Users can log into the UC PCA (/ciscopca)
    and authenticate their username/password against AD successfully.
    I'm trying to setup Outlook clients but I cannot authenticate my client when testing the connection to UC. My username's SMTP address is [email protected]
    and when I set-up my IMAP outlook client I am using an email address of [email protected], server information for IMAP has incoming and outgoing server address 10.1.1.1 (10.1.1.1 is my CUCMBE-UC address). I am using my username and password which works for ciscopca access (via AD authen). But when I test my connection it just kicks back the test that the log in failed.
    Is there a problem with authentication IMAP clients to UC-IMAP when AD auth/integration is used in Business Edition or am I missing something.
    THANKS!!

    So, there is one portion of the document that I sent you I'd like to focus in on and ask if you've tried this and, if not,
    please do:
    Configure the corporate email address of each user  as an SMTP proxy address for the user. When setting up the Connection  IMAP account on user workstations, use the corporate email address of  the user, rather than the Connection-specific email address, in the IMAP  settings. In this way, users do not need to know an extra set of email  addresses for addressing voice messages in the email client, and are  insulated from changes to the Connection-specific addresses if the  Connection SMTP domain is changed.
    In other words, you would have the following:
    AD User = jdoe
    CUC User = jdoe (synced from AD)
    Corporate SMTP/Email Address = [email protected]
    CUC SMTP/Email Address = [email protected]
    For jdoe's CUC user account, configure the SMTP proxy address to be the corporate email address ([email protected]).
    When you set the IMAP connection in Outlook, specify the SMTP Proxy Address as the connection name NOT the CUC SMTP address.  You would also provide your AD password just like you do with PCA.
    Have you tried to see if that yields different results?
    Hailey

  • Sending to Groups with IMAP client

    I have a user that is wondering if there is a way to send to a GroupWise group from his phone using the IMAP client. An example would be a Group we have named "All" that includes all company employees. He wants to send to [email protected] I don't think this is possible unless you are connecting with Web Access client, but it doesn't hurt to ask....
    Thanks for any ideas.

    Am 05.03.2015 um 18:10 schrieb MarkMoorhead:
    >
    > I have a user that is wondering if there is a way to send to a GroupWise
    > group from his phone using the IMAP client. An example would be a Group
    > we have named "All" that includes all company employees. He wants to
    > send to [email protected] I don't think this is possible unless you are
    > connecting with Web Access client, but it doesn't hurt to
    > ask....
    Just to count beans, IMPA isn't relevant here, as IMAP is strictly for
    receiving mails only. Sending is SMTP, just like any other sent email to
    your server. SO yes, groupwise *can* accept mail to groups, if it's
    configured to do so (expand groups on incoming messages in the GWIA).
    But of course, that makes those addressable by anybody, not limited to
    "your" phones or clients.
    CU,
    Massimo Rosen
    Novell Knowledge Partner
    No emails please!
    http://www.cfc-it.de

  • WebOS IMAP client: No expunge performed

    The IMAP client does not appear to have an option to automatically issue an IMAP EXPUNGE after a message deletion or when the folder / program is closed.
    This is a serious omission, as all of the messages you delete while using the Pre will still show up in the Inbox when accessing the mailbox from a desktop client.
    Please add the option to auto-EXPUNGE when closing a folder, if message deletions were performed.
    Update: In reviewing RFC3501, I see a simpler and more efficient option. Just do a CLOSE on the folder when closing it, and expunging the deleted messages is done automatically by the server.

    Hello
    Lyubov,
    Thank you for your question.
    I am trying to involve someone familiar with this topic to further look at this issue.
    Thanks,
    Simon
    We
    are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
    interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
    Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

  • 10.6.8 IMAP - Clients can't receive email

    I am running a IMAP mail server on Snow Leopard 10.6.8, which had been running fine for 1+ year.. It is located at my residence. Long story short, after a power outage/cable outage Comcast just decided to block port 25 on my residence which made me have to switch my SMTP port to 587. After much muddling around, I got that to go, but now clients can't recieve emails. I have turned on debug logging on the mail server, but I can't see anything to explain it. Eventually, the messages are kicked back to the sender (as a test, I sent from my mobile me account) with the following
    Thu, 07 Mar 2013 22:55:56 +000 (GMT) TCP active open: No addresses found for host Error: Connection timed out.
    However, I can't see any activtiy in the server side logs. DNS possibly?
    Any help is GREATLY appreciated.

    Here are the logs from the IMAP (last group of timestamps). Are there any other logs that would be useful?
    IMAP
    Mar  8 10:56:27 server dovecot[38993]: IMAP(*): Master disconnected (pid 39117)
    Mar  8 10:56:27 server dovecot[38993]: IMAP(*): Master disconnected (pid 39070)
    Mar  8 10:58:51 server dovecot[39343]: imap-login: Login: user=<dean>, method=PLAIN, rip=76.21.19.69, lip=192.168.1.210, TLS
    Mar  8 10:58:51 server dovecot[39343]: IMAP(*): maildir: data=/Volumes/External HD3/spool/imap/dovecot/mail/F037805C-94D5-47B8-8D48-DC15F14905AC
    Mar  8 10:58:51 server dovecot[39343]: IMAP(*): maildir++: root=/Volumes/External HD3/spool/imap/dovecot/mail/F037805C-94D5-47B8-8D48-DC15F14905AC, index=, control=, inbox=/Volumes/External HD3/spool/imap/dovecot/mail/F037805C-94D5-47B8-8D48-DC15F14905AC
    Mar  8 10:58:51 server dovecot[39343]: imap-login: Login: user=<dean>, method=PLAIN, rip=76.21.19.69, lip=192.168.1.210, TLS
    Mar  8 10:58:51 server dovecot[39343]: IMAP(*): maildir: data=/Volumes/External HD3/spool/imap/dovecot/mail/F037805C-94D5-47B8-8D48-DC15F14905AC
    Mar  8 10:58:51 server dovecot[39343]: IMAP(*): maildir++: root=/Volumes/External HD3/spool/imap/dovecot/mail/F037805C-94D5-47B8-8D48-DC15F14905AC, index=, control=, inbox=/Volumes/External HD3/spool/imap/dovecot/mail/F037805C-94D5-47B8-8D48-DC15F14905AC
    Mar  8 11:00:51 server dovecot[39343]: imap-login: Login: user=<dean>, method=PLAIN, rip=76.21.19.69, lip=192.168.1.210, TLS
    Mar  8 11:00:51 server dovecot[39343]: IMAP(*): maildir: data=/Volumes/External HD3/spool/imap/dovecot/mail/F037805C-94D5-47B8-8D48-DC15F14905AC
    Mar  8 11:00:51 server dovecot[39343]: IMAP(*): maildir++: root=/Volumes/External HD3/spool/imap/dovecot/mail/F037805C-94D5-47B8-8D48-DC15F14905AC, index=, control=, inbox=/Volumes/External HD3/spool/imap/dovecot/mail/F037805C-94D5-47B8-8D48-DC15F14905AC
    Mar  8 11:02:28 server dovecot[39343]: imap-login: Login: user=<dean>, method=CRAM-MD5, rip=192.168.1.210, lip=192.168.1.210, TLS
    Mar  8 11:02:28 server dovecot[39343]: IMAP(*): maildir: data=/Volumes/External HD3/spool/imap/dovecot/mail/F037805C-94D5-47B8-8D48-DC15F14905AC
    Mar  8 11:02:28 server dovecot[39343]: IMAP(*): maildir++: root=/Volumes/External HD3/spool/imap/dovecot/mail/F037805C-94D5-47B8-8D48-DC15F14905AC, index=, control=, inbox=/Volumes/External HD3/spool/imap/dovecot/mail/F037805C-94D5-47B8-8D48-DC15F14905AC

  • Problem setting up IMAP client that is housed on my MacMini OS 10.6 Server

    I can access my mail account on my Mac Mini OS 10.6 server from my iMac. I can not set up the clients on my iPhone (3S) and iPad (Wi-Fi). Both access the sever through the same Wi-Fi circuit that the iMac uses. Both were originally are synced to the iMac. Error message is first
    "No password is provided for IMAP account". When the password is manually added then the response is
    ""servername" is not responding. Check your network connection and that you entered the correct information in the "incoming Mail Server" filed. I have checked multiple times and modified connection settings just to get the same response. Thank goodness the iMac client works. Could this be a mail server setting or a DNS issue?

    It amuses me that the email that was sent to confirm the posting of this question had a clickable link. Naturally that link did not work. Cutting and pasting it into FireFox allowed me to complete the posting process. Annoying.

  • BCC will not show recipients in Mail app - for IMAP client user

    Our office iMac was just upgraded to Mavericks.  The Apple mail app (which we use via IMAP to receive our gmail) will not show BCC recipients on sent mail.  Not sure what other info you might need.
    Yes it did work prior to Mavericks upgrade --lots of other quirks that are just user preference issues but this is by far a concern because we need to keep track of school sent emails.  So far the only solution has been to use the gmail client via web interface -- hoping there is a different solution!
    Thanks for any help
    Joanne Bartolotti
    ST Robert School
    San Bruno

    John -- Thank you for your reply. 
    When we send the email we (our user end) can see the recipients in the BCC field (good)
    When the email is delivered they (the recipient) cannot see all the other emails (good)
    "Susie" (who was on our original BCC list as a recipient) calls and says I did not get the email - We go to our sent folder and click on the sent email to verify the email address we used but (and here's the issue) it says "No recipients"
    Prior to installing OSX Mavericks -- it listed ALL the recipients in our sent folder copy of the email (this was very helpful to us)
    To date the ONLY solution has been to use the web version of gmail -- My question is (and please know I have done a number of checks on this process) Why did it work BEFORE upgrading to Mavericks and why does it not work NOW?  Our school secretary is convinced it is "my fault" for upgrading the system -- I am convinced there is a user error since she NEVER lists anyone in the TO field
    She will NOT use the web interface because it takes "too much time" -- for this my response is -- then fix it yourself! (Sorry 10 days left of school -- tech coordinator frustration creeping in -- tired of id10t erros -- should have waited to upgrade until no one was around and NOT tell them!)
    Joanne

  • HP UPD 5.3 - some clients print garbage

    Server: Windows 2008 R2 SP1.
    Clients: XP SP3.
    Yesterday I upgraded from HP UPD PS 5.2.6.9321 to 5.3.1.10527.  This morning I find out that tons of users are now printing "garbage".  This garbage is actually raw PostScript code from all types of applications.  The kicker to this problem
    is that it appears to be PC and/or user based.  For example, WorkstationA prints out garbage but WorkstationB prints just fine -- they both are using the same queue on the print server.  Deleting all HP printers from the client and
    re-installing from the print server does not fix it.  If I change the print driver on the print server for the problem queue from HP Universal Printing PS (v5.3) to HP Universal Printing PS (v5.2), then the XP clients can print just fine again.
    I've contacted HP and found out that other clients are reporting this problem too.  Awesome.
    While I wait for HP to investigate/resolve the problem, what would cause some XP clients to print raw postscript while others work fine?

    Dear Customer,
    Thank you for posting here!
    After reading your post, I still have a few questions not very clear. Please let me know some information as below:
    1. Please capture a screenshot and send it to the me([email protected]).
    I appreciate your time and cooperation. If anything is unclear, please feel free to let me know. I am looking forward to hearing from you.
    如果您对我们的论坛在线支持服务有任何的意见或建议,请通过邮件告诉我们。
    立刻免费下载 
    TechNet
    论坛好帮手
    Tom Zhang – MSFT

  • Automatic IMAP email retrieval not disconnecting o...

    Hiya
    Have setup an IMAP mailbox with a 15 minute auto mail retrieval on my N95. Unfortunately, after it's checked for new emails for the first time it never seems to disconnect from the server and constantly maintains the GPRS/3G connection, sucking battery big style.
    Is there a way to get the phone to disconnect once it's checked for new emails? It seems to work this way when using pop, but not with imap.
    Is this a bug, intentional or have I done something wrong?

    27-Oct-200701:38 PM
    e61drc wrote:
    It is a feature called IMAP-IDLE!
    Nice. Can it be turned off?

Maybe you are looking for