IMAP Email Portlet Error accessing email with blank subject field

I have sucessfully deployed imap portlet and added it to a page. I am able to read and compose emails. However while testing the portlet I ran into few problems:
1. Cannot read an email from inbox if the subject field of email is blank. Only way to read this email is to first select an email that has a subject and then navigate through "next" or "previous" button to read this email.
2. Some of the emails does not show the attachments. Some of them dooes show it. I am unable to figure why is it doing so.
3. It takes too long to load and sometimes ends up in "portlet time out".
Has anyone else also ran into such problems. Is there a solution to these problems.
Thanks
Abhishek Periwal

Thanks for early reply.
I analayzed my emails and figured out that email that are forwarded to me with some attachments have problems. These emails do not include the actual attachments , they only include the text part written by the sender. It will be great if this bug gets fixed.
Secondly I increased the time out and it helped. Thanks for your suggestion.
Thanks
Abhishek

Similar Messages

I submitted my podcast and I got an email saying error, I checked with the feed validator and got this message: This feed does not validate. line 40, column 6: Undefined item element: itunes:order, how do sort this out, someone help me please.

I submitted my podcast and I got an email saying error, I checked with the feed validator and got this message: This feed does not validate. line 40, column 6: Undefined item element: itunes:order, how do sort this out, someone help me please.

Ignore it. 'itunes:order' is a recent addition which FeedValidator doesn't know about. If your podcast is rejected that is unlikely to be the reason. Of course as you haven't posted the feed URL nor the text of the error message I can't make any further comment.

Mail from Exchange 2010 mailbox - BCC to Hotmail addresses with blank To: field not hounoured

Hi
This feels related to a previous question
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/exchange/en-US/bec88844-79c1-4d17-bf73-9425842b22de/problem-sending-mail-with-bcc-and-without-to?forum=exchangesvrgenerallegacy but is slightly different - it just applies to Hotmail and related addresses (e.g.
hotmail.com, hotmail.co.uk, outlook.com, live.co.uk).
Sending from our Exchange 2010 to BCC addresses with blank To: field, the BCC is not being honoured, but just by Hotmail-related addresses. Any Hotmail-related recipient sent to in this fashion sees all their and other Hotmail-related addresses in the To:
field. But any other addresses to other mail hosts (gmail, yahoo etc) in the same BCC list aren't shown, and recipients at the other mail hosts have a fully hidden BCC list (i.e. see no To addresses at all).
If the To: field has an address then there is no problem - all BCC addresses are hidden for all recipients as expected.
It feels like it is the way the header is being handled by the Hotmail MTAs. But I only see this behaviour from our Exchange 2010 servers (including test servers).
Below are message headers from examples - anyone any ideas on this?
Thanks,
Gordon
Headers from the same message sent as a BCC to a "@live.co.uk" address and "@gmail.com" address with no To: field, and below that a header of similar with a To: field.
First message, sent from [email protected] (gets translated to
[email protected]) BCCd to
[email protected] and [email protected] with no To: address.
Seen in mailbox of [email protected] (note the "to:" field at the bottom - this is what is being shown in the UI):
x-store-info:J++/JTCzmObr++wNraA4Pa4f5Xd6uensaUSop/gUCq9urBwwSF/6FOwwl1Py7H+wW1z5lc55JnUJDXNvxmGUxkw/bnnWJePWYXWzuS5Ywv2HQzl2GD+3A6SoaKpjD5JlShFHg3JE6so=
Authentication-Results: hotmail.com; spf=pass (sender IP is 143.52.X.XX)
[email protected]; dkim=none header.d=shu.ac.uk; x-hmca=pass
[email protected]
X-SID-PRA: [email protected]
X-AUTH-Result: PASS
X-SID-Result: PASS
X-Message-Status: n:n
X-Message-Delivery: Vj0xLjE7dXM9MDtsPTE7YT0xO0Q9MTtHRD0xO1NDTD0w
X-Message-Info: NhFq/7gR1vQRHV6jbdvQfibhgw1iwvrSqdhXuaSscqGalY1BHnH2KCdI+PRBKCQiYnAlF/zI6HIxnd9XTtPz9XHPDwg5mATFcpFtv9WV5ImszG0/OtQaSIg5iX4MbuVLCVo+t2VN/SyhCbwRod9LNPet1UXZtp+Oho5aLYTKlYQVRQ8OWRHqxMCUhgER4oHof+Be4v85/e3u59xr9Q2GEVPOpY/FDKse
Received: from MTA2.shu.ac.uk ([143.52.X.XX]) by SNT004-MC4F19.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.22712);
Wed, 10 Sep 2014 03:56:32 -0700
Received: from MTA1 ([10.14.XXX.XXX])
by MTA2.shu.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
id 1XRfZg-0004Kn-9C
for [email protected]; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 11:56:32 +0100
Received: from CAS1.shu.ac.uk ([10.14.XX.XX])
by MTA1 with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1)
(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
id 1XRfZg-0002cz-2q; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 11:56:32 +0100
Received: from MBX1.shu.ac.uk ([xxxx::xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx]) by
CAS1.shu.ac.uk ([xxxx::xxxx:10.14.XX.XX%12]) with mapi id
14.03.0174.001; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 11:56:29 +0100
From: "user1" <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: PLease ignore yet again! testing Bcc again - no "to" field
Thread-Topic: PLease ignore yet again! testing Bcc again - no "to" field
Thread-Index: Ac/M5d+WfHZZ5GLGRsCfXxvcxsjnbw==
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 10:56:28 +0000
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.14.XXX.XXX]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="_000_24BACA8040C3054487601DFC4087062C8C013974mbx1sh_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
to: [email protected]
Return-Path: [email protected]
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Sep 2014 10:56:33.0151 (UTC) FILETIME=[E23190F0:01CFCCE5]
Seen in mailbox of [email protected]:
Delivered-To: [email protected]
Received: by 10.25.156.200 with SMTP id f191csp386624lfe;
        Wed, 10 Sep 2014 03:56:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.194.200.137 with SMTP id js9mr48633666wjc.90.1410346592418;
        Wed, 10 Sep 2014 03:56:32 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <[email protected]>
Received: from MTA1 (MTA1. [143.52.X.XXX])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id cg3si20369633wjc.56.2014.09.10.03.56.32
        for <[email protected]>
        (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
        Wed, 10 Sep 2014 03:56:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of [email protected] designates 143.52.X.XXX as permitted sender) client-ip=143.52.X.XXX;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com;
       spf=pass (google.com: domain of
[email protected] designates 143.52.X.XXX as permitted sender)
[email protected]
Received: from CAS1.shu.ac.uk ([10.14.XX.XX])
by MTA1 with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1)
(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
id 1XRfZg-0002cz-2q; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 11:56:32 +0100
Received: from MBX1.shu.ac.uk ([xxxx::xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx]) by
CAS1.shu.ac.uk ([xxxx::xxxx:10.14.XX.XX%12]) with mapi id
14.03.0174.001; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 11:56:29 +0100
From: "user1" <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: PLease ignore yet again! testing Bcc again - no "to" field
Thread-Topic: PLease ignore yet again! testing Bcc again - no "to" field
Thread-Index: Ac/M5d+WfHZZ5GLGRsCfXxvcxsjnbw==
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 10:56:28 +0000
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.14.XXX.XXX]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="_000_24BACA8040C3054487601DFC4087062C8C013974mbx1sh_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Similar message sent with [email protected] in To: field: from
[email protected]/[email protected] BCCd to
[email protected] and
[email protected] as seen in mailbox of [email protected]
x-store-info:J++/JTCzmObr++wNraA4Pa4f5Xd6uensaUSop/gUCq9v81cBAiz99O+8SxkfBVJ9NjbAXH8xe1rjvemR/ciBJT5MdkHvi8JYPj0vgDySrSfVnSG2OjgyyKNgjV2QF5PyGqXgRRVkQVM=
Authentication-Results: hotmail.com; spf=pass (sender IP is 143.52.X.XX)
[email protected]; dkim=none header.d=shu.ac.uk; x-hmca=pass
[email protected]
X-SID-PRA: [email protected]
X-AUTH-Result: PASS
X-SID-Result: PASS
X-Message-Status: n:n
X-Message-Delivery: Vj0xLjE7dXM9MDtsPTE7YT0xO0Q9MTtHRD0xO1NDTD0w
X-Message-Info: NhFq/7gR1vTvTqmPqDcS3ZKVZ4zJXdbe/WQhPCDn6U7TYJxfLAm+gALYf9z8EvjEIPauVTBwIF/uNFwreEfp3wgBZYYA8nUP8PFhNAMvRkDwCAnqdyWkFMZlNIQlCYkX84PJFTI7+qoRwxyIjAr2dfuXuj/qYYgN8IbRFD0FftK7d85hSKx/muFfL/1x713Efp1R2ztH/sUzvcxbXl+i8zHWvMqqF945
Received: from MTA2.shu.ac.uk ([143.52.X.XX]) by BAY004-MC6F14.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.22712);
Wed, 10 Sep 2014 05:22:06 -0700
Received: from MTA1 ([10.14.XXX.XXX])
by MTA2.shu.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.76)
(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
id 1XRguU-0006jA-4s
for [email protected]; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 13:22:06 +0100
Received: from CAS2.shu.ac.uk ([10.14.XX.XX])
by MTA1.shu.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1)
(envelope-from <[email protected]>)
id 1XRguU-0001YY-0a; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 13:22:06 +0100
Received: from MBX1.shu.ac.uk ([xxxx::xxxx:xxxx:xxxx:xxxx]) by
CAS2.shu.ac.uk ([xxxx::xxxx:10.14.XX.XX%15]) with mapi id
14.03.0174.001; Wed, 10 Sep 2014 13:22:00 +0100
From: "user1" <[email protected]>
Subject: test BCC - using own name in To
Thread-Topic: test BCC - using own name in To
Thread-Index: Ac/M8dJDWdvoIxoORH2RMAqNKM2m1w==
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2014 12:22:00 +0000
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.14.XXX.XXX]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="_000_24BACA8040C3054487601DFC4087062C8C013A65mbx1sh_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [email protected]
Return-Path: [email protected]
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Sep 2014 12:22:07.0005 (UTC) FILETIME=[D63584D0:01CFCCF1]

I'm guessing that they're using something other than Exchange for the MTA's. I don't recall seeing this in the "Received:" headers ever since Exchange stopped using the MS Windows SMTP service:
Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.22712)
--- Rich Matheisen MCSE&I, Exchange MVP

Can message filters cause messages with blank subject and 1969 dates

I have done many things to try to trace why I get messages with blank subjects and 1969 dates.
downloaded TB
created all new folders
moved only persdict and msfFilterRules to the new profile.
At this try
set the option NOT to download messages on startup
went off line and compacted all folders.
emptied the inbox and all subfolders.
Exited TB.
deleted all files under pop.verizon.net except msgFilters rules.
Deleted all msf files for local folders in my profile.
opened TB.
a few times
--With Firefox went to verizon webmail and moved a few messages to the Verizon inbox.
--moved to TB window
-- Clicked <get messages>
-- still received blank messages with 1969 dates
-- deleted those messages
-- emptied trash
went to the filter rules and unclicked all filters that send files to local folders
left 2 rules in place
(1) if a sender was in my address list send the message to inbox folder called "Known sender"
(2) if the subject was NOT a weird string like "&*%$@!+=?><" send the message to inbox folder called "Suspicious" This filter is because there is not an ELSE function in TB it is extremely unlikely that a message would have such a subject.
[These two filters should move all messages except junk to the two folders.]
I then tried the above procedure of going to Verizon, moving messages to Verizon Inbox, etc. a few times.
I did NOT get the messages with blank subject and 1969 date!!
Questions:
(1) Is this just a fluke?
(2) From understanding the internals of TB is it reasonable that some now-unchecked message filter(s) had caused there to be the oddball messages?
(3) if It is a filter rule, how can I find out which one it is?

I looked though all the condition specification options I do not see how using header info in a condition specification would '''change '''the header info.
I looked at the possible actions on filters.
I only see "tag" and "Star" as ones that might change header info.
However, I found out that when I unchecked the first 17 of 19 filters and just had the two I explained above I would sometimes get a message with the 1969 date.
Since then I deleted those two rules and made new versions and moved them to the bottom where the earlier versions had been. I have not had the 1969 messages since!!
I have put a new filter at the top of the list that checks whether the date is before 1/1/971. If teh date is before 1/1/1971 the filter tags the message as important and moves it into the inbox folder named "Suspicious".
I have not seen any 1969 messages since then.
Since the problem was intermittent and because I was not able to create conditions whereby The 1969 dates would or would not occur, the problem may not be 'fixed'. I'll watch it for a while
Meanwhile, I'll continue to manually go though the webmail on Verizon and as a test only download mail that I do not want to save for the long term. Messages I want to keep I'll move messages I want to keep for the long term into foldrs on Verizon. '''If '''after a while, I do not get any more of the 1969 messages, I'll move messages I want to keep into the Verizon inbox and download them into TB

SCOT: When email status error, send email to sender

Hello everyone
I would like to know if it is possible to configure SCOT to send an email to the sender when an email ending as error.
Here is the scenario.
1. An email is sent through scot.
2. SCOT process the email and comeback with an error. Example msg 841 (message too long)
3. So, when the email status is an error, an email should be sent to the sender to advise him of the problem.
So, the sender will be able to act quickly and perform corrective action.
Any idea on how to configure this?
Regards
dstj

Hello Volkoale
Sorry, it is in project plan at the moment. I didn't have time to do it.
Here is some speudo code:
Select all record from SOST table where MSGTY = 'E'   " Message type Error
                                                                 and entry_date = sy-datlo
                                                                 and entry_time is between now and 15 minutes ago.
   select al record from SOOS where corresponding to SOST.
               field SOOS-sndnam correspond to the sender of the message.
    The table SOOD contain the title of the email (Field "OBJDES" )
When you have all those records.
you can send an email to the sender.
I hope that can help you.

Five days ago I received an email from an anonymous sender with the subject: Your Apple ID was just used to buy full album Elton John 312.99. Your receipt No. 37930343160405752. the content began: Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 From (my email add

Five days ago I received an anonymous email with the subject:
Your Apple ID was just used to buy full album Elton John £12.99.Your receipt No.37930343160405752
The content started: Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 From:(my email address) followed by a very,very,very long stream of gobbledygook. There is no record of it in my i-tunes purchases or my credit card statement but that might only be because I have not updated my credit card details. Should I be worried that my account has been compromised? Does anyone know how I can get through to the right section of Apple to deal with this - all the emails I get say no-reply so I don't have an email address to contact them on.
I would be most grateful if anyone could help me with this.
Thanks in advance
Walwal

It's a phishing attempt to try and get your account and payment details - forward it to Apple : [email protected] , and then delete it
Phishing emails : Identifying fraudulent "phishing" email - Apple Support
Genuine emails : Identifying legitimate emails from the iTunes Store - Apple Support

Email in box is filling with no subject, undeleteable email, only on iPad.

In the past 2 weeks my email in box if filling with dozens of no subject emails, many dated 1969. They will not delete and they don't show on iPhone or on my Mac. Any ideas to rectify?

Two options:
1. Reboot your iPad: Press and hold BOTH the power and home buttons at the SAME time for at least 10 seconds (ignore the red slider) until the Apple Logo appears. Then let go of both buttons and your iPad will restart. If that doesn't work.......
2. Delete the email box from your iPad. Then reinstall it.
I have seen one or both suggestions offer relief from this issue.

Security error accessing url with crossdomain.xml in InDesign FlexUI

I'm evaluating Flex as a UI component in an InDesign script. Part of what it needs to do involves retrieving some data from a web server to be displayed in a datagrid. I've written a server running on localhost that will provide this data. Everything works fine when I run the component from Flash Builder or from the HTML wrapper page that is generated during the release build, but once I copy the .swf to the InDesign scripts folder and load it as part of a ScriptUI component, I get a fault response ("security error accessing url") when connecting to the server. I'm running this bit of code in from my Flex client:
var h:HTTPService = new HTTPService();
h.url = "http://localhost:8080/elements";
h.method = "GET";
h.addEventListener("result", getElementsResult);
h.addEventListener("fault", getElementsFault);
h.send();
From what I've read, I may need a crossdomain.xml file at the root of my host, so I've added that to the server and can see that it is being accessed whenever the flex component attempts to connect to the service.
My crossdomain.xml file is:
<?xml version="1.0" ?>
<!DOCTYPE cross-domain-policy SYSTEM 'http://www.adobe.com/xml/dtds/cross-domain-policy.dtd'>
<cross-domain-policy>
<allow-access-from domain="*"/>
</cross-domain-policy>
which seems to be correct, from what I understand. I've also tried quite a few other variations (setting explicit site-control policies, etc.). I'm quite new to Flex/Flash and I'm basically stuck at this point. Where might I be going wrong?

I think sleeping on this one helped... I found that if I serve the .swf from my web server then everything works out fine. Loading it from the local filesystem seems to have been the problem.

Imap authentication fail error - cannot email pdf

!I installed acrobat XI about 6 months ago and still have not been able to figure out how to get it to send a pdf other than closing it. Copying it from file location and then posting in an amail. HIGHLY ANNOYING!!! When i try send directly from open pdf i get imap authentication error. I use WIN 365 subscription provided by my company. PLEASE HELP!!!

Generally Acrobat communicates with e-mail packages using IMAP. It may be that your e-mail package does not have IMAP implemented or activated. More information on your client and OS would be useful in trying to help. I still have one machine I could never get Acrobat to talk with my e-mail package, even though IMAP is active. So I don't have perfect answers, but generally have found that the IMAP is either a system or client issue, not an Acrobat issue.

Workflow Email Notification with blank subject header

Hi Gurus,
I am not a workflow expert but I am looking into a situation where some PO upon sending for PO release approval, there is subject header but for certain country, there isn't any header.
Please advice where to check.
Thanks in advance for your help.

Hello,
First check (in SWEL) which events are created when a sales order is created.
From this you can deduce the BOR object.
See if the business partner's contact person email is an attribute of the object; if not then you will have to add an attribute that deduces the email via an ABAP program or function module.
This attribute should be added to a delegated subtype of the BOR object.
Then you can use the new attribute of the BOR object in the workflow to send him a message.
Try it.
regards
Rick Bakker
Hanabi Technology

What is the likely source of a recent flurry of bogus emails supposedly from trusted correspondents, with no subject, no message and only a link (which I never click)?

I don't know that this is the community I should be addressing, but I can't find any dedicated to Apple's Mail appllication that came with my iMac or OS.
I've always been fortunate (as I'm told all Apple product users are) to have little trouble with phony messages or invasive viruses, etc. Lately, however, I have been getting numerous (a couple a day or so) bogus emails suppossedly from my brother or niece or a friend. They frequently have no subject line and often give return email addresses that make no sense and bear no resemblance to the actual addresses of the supposed senders. What is goin on? Is my computer infected? How do I find out? How do I go about correcting the problem?

Your computer is not infected, and it's not anything you have done nor anything you can do about it. Someone else's computer or email account has been hacked and harvested to send out spam messages. My guess is someone's computer with a link to Facebook has been hacked, since the messages like this I've received have all been people on Facebook.
All you can do is delete the messages, and if you have a spam filter looks at the email addresses in your address book, whitelist the actual addresses you wish to allow through and then start marking these bogus messages as spam.
Regards.

Error accessing protocols with JAXM 1.1.2 Provider Admin Tool

I installed JAXM 1.1.2 with JWSDP 1.2 on W2K Pro according the instructions under the JAXM doc's "Integration with JWSDP" link. The samples seem to be working. However, when I start the JAXM Provider Admin tool and drill down to one of the protocols (e.g., Profiles > SOAPRP > HTTP), the server throws an exception. I tried this on two different machines and got the same result. The jaxm-provider webapp's provider.xml looks reasonable. Anyone have any idea what's going on?
Thanks,
Mike
Here's the stack trace:
HTTP Status 500 -
type Exception report
message
description The server encountered an internal error () that prevented it from fulfilling this request.
exception
org.apache.jasper.JasperException
     at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.service(JspServletWrapper.java:367)
     at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.serviceJspFile(JspServlet.java:293)
     at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.service(JspServlet.java:240)
     at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:856)
     at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:288)
     at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206)
     at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:263)
     at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardValveContext.invokeNext(StandardValveContext.java:151)
     at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:562)
     at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:1018)
     at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:196)
     at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardValveContext.invokeNext(StandardValveContext.java:151)
     at org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke(AuthenticatorBase.java:558)
     at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardValveContext.invokeNext(StandardValveContext.java:149)
     at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:562)
     at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:1018)
     at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.invoke(StandardContext.java:2748)
     at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:186)
     at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardValveContext.invokeNext(StandardValveContext.java:151)
     at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorDispatcherValve.invoke(ErrorDispatcherValve.java:171)
     at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardValveContext.invokeNext(StandardValveContext.java:149)
     at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:172)
     at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardValveContext.invokeNext(StandardValveContext.java:149)
     at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:562)
     at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:1018)
     at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:163)
     at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardValveContext.invokeNext(StandardValveContext.java:151)
     at org.apache.catalina.valves.AccessLogValve.invoke(AccessLogValve.java:512)
     at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardValveContext.invokeNext(StandardValveContext.java:149)
     at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:562)
     at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:1018)
     at org.apache.coyote.tomcat5.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:199)
     at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:637)
     at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.processConnection(Http11Protocol.java:463)
     at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.TcpWorkerThread.runIt(PoolTcpEndpoint.java:568)
     at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool.java:631)
     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:536)
root cause
java.lang.NullPointerException
     at provideradmin.util.MessageUtil.initializeConfig(MessageUtil.java:281)
     at org.apache.jsp.soaprp_005fhttp_jsp._jspService(soaprp_005fhttp_jsp.java:112)
     at org.apache.jasper.runtime.HttpJspBase.service(HttpJspBase.java:136)
     at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:856)
     at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.service(JspServletWrapper.java:320)
     at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.serviceJspFile(JspServlet.java:293)
     at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.service(JspServlet.java:240)
     at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:856)
     at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:288)
     at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:206)
     at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:263)
     at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardValveContext.invokeNext(StandardValveContext.java:151)
     at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:562)
     at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:1018)
     at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:196)
     at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardValveContext.invokeNext(StandardValveContext.java:151)
     at org.apache.catalina.authenticator.AuthenticatorBase.invoke(AuthenticatorBase.java:558)
     at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardValveContext.invokeNext(StandardValveContext.java:149)
     at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:562)
     at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:1018)
     at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext.invoke(StandardContext.java:2748)
     at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:186)
     at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardValveContext.invokeNext(StandardValveContext.java:151)
     at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorDispatcherValve.invoke(ErrorDispatcherValve.java:171)
     at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardValveContext.invokeNext(StandardValveContext.java:149)
     at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:172)
     at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardValveContext.invokeNext(StandardValveContext.java:149)
     at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:562)
     at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:1018)
     at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:163)
     at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardValveContext.invokeNext(StandardValveContext.java:151)
     at org.apache.catalina.valves.AccessLogValve.invoke(AccessLogValve.java:512)
     at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardValveContext.invokeNext(StandardValveContext.java:149)
     at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardPipeline.invoke(StandardPipeline.java:562)
     at org.apache.catalina.core.ContainerBase.invoke(ContainerBase.java:1018)
     at org.apache.coyote.tomcat5.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:199)
     at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:637)
     at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Protocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.processConnection(Http11Protocol.java:463)
     at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.TcpWorkerThread.runIt(PoolTcpEndpoint.java:568)
     at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool.java:631)
     at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:536)
Java Web Services Developer Pack/1.2

Problem solved. JWSDP_HOME/common/lib had log4j-1.2.8.jar from the Axis 1.1 distribution. After I moved the jar to JWSDP_HOME/jwsdp-shared/lib, the jaxm provider admin works (and Axis still finds the log4j jar file).
Mike

Error on MIGO with added new field that was not pass empty

Hello,
I added new field and screen to MIGO with MB_MIGO_BADI using Sample
Code. It seems on MIGO. But when i pass empty this new field, i take an
error message. So how can i pass empty for this new field?
Best regards,
Munur

I send all methods codes by order :
Moderator message - Please respect the 5,000 character maximum when posting. Post only the relevant portions of code
Edited by: Rob Burbank on Jan 11, 2011 5:12 PM

Error in reconciliation with invoice subject to wtax on payment

When doing reconcilation to BP ,an error appears "Withholding Tax needs to be processed for at least one of the selected transactions. This can only be done by restricting reconciliation to transactions with the same withholding tax code."
This error appears when we try to reconcile Invoice that is subject to withholding tax on payment. Payment was partial only and the balance is adjusted as CM or JE. When doing the internal recon, the above error appears.
Please let us know how to resolve the problem.
Thanks,
Janice

Hi Jesper,
I read the note and as per my understanding it was the systme behavior of SAP if we reconcile BP with JE or other documents with withholding tax this error will appear. The note does not give any workaround resolution on how to resolve that issue.
Did you guys have any idea on how to resolve or to closed the invoice transactions inc. withholding tax that was partially paid and the remaining balance was done in JE or CM?
Thanks,
Janice

Saving Notifications with blank Mandatory Fields

Dear Experts,
I have an observation.
The tabs 10\TAB02 and 10\TAB06 of a notification are having mandatory fields.
Saving of this notification is refused without filling the mandatory fileds of tab 10\TAB02, but the same thing is not happening with the other tab namely 10\TAB06. (This notification is saving without filling the mandatory fields of this tab).
How to avoid this?
Regards
Jogeswara Rao

10\TAB01     Notification 1     Header Info
10\TAB02     Additional data 1     Equipment/Material
10\TAB06     Location
10\TAB10     Item     Catalogs & Codes
10\TAB11     Tasks     Tasks
10\TAB17     Additional data 4     Additional Data
20\TAB01     Item overview     Object Part & Damage
20\TAB02     Item causes     Causes
20\TAB03     Item tasks     Tasks
20\TAB04     Item activities     Activities
This is the set-up.
-Jogeswara Rao
Edited by: K Jogeswara Rao on Jul 16, 2010 7:21 AM

IMAP Email Portlet Error accessing email with blank subject field

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for