IMEI invalid, why?

I type the correct IMEI number in nokiafreecharger.com but it says invalid. I have contacted to the live chat and confirm the IMEI is right. But do get the reply on why the IMEI is invalid, should I wait for 14 days since my purchase?

I am sure they will get to the bottom if it. Just have to give them a chance to figure it out first.

Similar Messages

HT4759 need to complete my account registration to install apps.. postcode is invalid, why?

need to complete my account registration to install apps.. postcode is invalid, why?
I am from Giza, Egypt.. my postcode is 12311 is not valid!

I've tried that too. Everything I am being told to do isn't working.

When I enter the printer code it says it is invalid, why?

When I enter the printer code it says it is invalid, why?

Hi Kathyjm,
I understand that your trying to setup ePrint. I have a couple of questions for you.
What printer do you have?
Have you created an ePrint account?
Create ePrint account here.

IMEI invalid

Why my IMEI number showed invalid?

niteshfromrichmond wrote:
Actually I purchased last year from At&t.
And this week I was trying to unlock my iphone online and also put my number there and today when I was trying to look up that my iphone is unlocked or not
But now its saying invalid number.
There are ZERO legitimate sites that can tell you anything about your IMEI other than Apple or the carrier the phone is currently used with. If you entered an IMEI into a site that claims to be able to tell you about your phone you should be prepared to deal with identity theft.

I had Lightroom 5, my computer crashed, I reinstalled it from Creative Cloud but it keeps saying my activation code is invalid, why?

I had Lightroom 5, my computer messed up and I had to refresh it, well it deleted Lightroom so I reinstalled it again. When I put the serial number in it keeps saying it is invalid. Why?

If you're positive the information is correct, ask the issuing bank why the transaction is being rejected.
You're getting this error because the store can not authorize the card with your bank.

I have used several different cards, but it continue to say the security code is invalid -- why??!, I have used several different cards, but it continue to say the security code is invalid -- why??!

Attempting to use iTunes and the app store again-- no matter which cardS I use it always says invalid security (cvv2) number.... HELP

Try here > iTunes Store: My credit card's security code or zip code does not match my bank's records

Downloaded 2 books from library but can't open them invalid Why?

Been using Overdrive Media Console for 2 yrs without a hitch & without having to sign in. Now asked to sign in which I have done an innumerable times with no success. Have changed my password, turned off IPad & on again. Librarian said Adobe support told them that I had too many devises with the same user name. However, I have only this devise I use for using Overdrive. I do not read on any other devise.Can someone help me out & tell me what I have to do to fix this?I would prefer not deleting the app & starting again but that was my next option. Thanks. Carole

Dear GBI,
welcome to this forum! I gather from your information that you are not ON-LINE when you try to open the message. Most likely you are using a phone-in acount and somewhere in your acccount settings, messages over a certain size (e.g. 30kB) are left on the server. You have to decide that you want to receive them, reconnect to your server and than the whole message is downloaded to your computer! Hope this is helpful, otherwise give more detalis about your mode of connection ad type of account (POP, IMAP, ??. Success Frank

Method Body invalid - Why?

Hello. I'm new to the forums so firstly, Hi! to all you guys and gals out there.
OK, I've just started a new project which is quite a big one so I might be on here often. I'm using the Eclipse compiler/development program as it is the best for me as I'm partially sighted. It also has really good autocorrect features (when it can!).
I entered the following code for my 'feel-good' class:
* Created on 21-Nov-2005
* @author Hussein Patwa
public class Main {
public static void main(String[] args) {
String UserName;
// String to hold the user's name
String GameName;
// String to hold the name of the game for use in dialogs and user feedback
public void enterUserName(UserName)
this.UserName = UserName;
/* Allows the user to enter his/her name for use in dialogs
*/ and user feedback
public void changeUserName(UserName)
this.UserName = UserName;
/* Allows the user to change his/her name for use in dialogs
*/ and user feedback
}Sorry it hasn't come out well formatted. The only errors are the method bodies, starting with the 'this.UserName' part. I thought I would try to keep things simple rather than creating different temporary variables and therefore just replace the existing UserName string I declared at the start of the class (I need that to be accessible from the outside anyway).
Please bear in mind that I am relatively new to Java so any 'technical' solution will probably go way over my head. Also, in now and future posts, I am NOT developing any GUI interfaces.
If you could help I would really appreciate it. Once again, hello to all, and hope to hear from you soon.
Regards.
Hussein.

Well, they aren't method bodies because you have written ill-formed code. Please take the basic Java tutorials which you can easily find on the java.sun.com web site.

Why does an Orange UK iPhone unlock take 30 days?

Orange UK says an iPhone unlock can take up to 30 days. AT&T can do it in 72 hours according to this article http://thenextweb.com/mobile/2012/04/08/atts-iphone-unlock-process-detailed-a-qu ick-online-chat-apple-does-the-unlocking-requires-imei-only/
Why the difference?
And why when you ask for a PAC number from Orange UK as you approach contract end don't they offer to unlock your iPhone at the same time (for which they charge £20)?

Henry Dodds wrote:
Why the difference?
It's simply Orange's policy on unlocking. Carriers can impose their own criteria/policy on unlocking.

Apex using result_cache has an invalid status for wwv_flow_language query

In the v_$result_cache_objects view of SYS I noticed that Apex is using the result_cache feature of 11g.
Some of the Apex queries will have the status 'PUBLISHED', but others have the status 'INVALID'
Why does the "SELECT /*+ result_cache */ NLS_LANGUAGE, NLS_TERRITORY, NLS_SORT, NLS_WINDOWS_CHARSET FROM WWV_FLOW_LANGUAGES WHERE LANG_ID_UPPE..." query has a INVALID status?
It already happens when I start APEX (http://localhost:7778/pls/apex).
As I understand the result_cache method it will invalidate the cache after an update is done on the depending table.
Does it make sense that those Apex queries has a result_cache hint when it will be invalidated soon after?

Hi,
just had a look at our own development box and for me this query doesn't show the status INVALID. It would also not make a lot of sense because this table is only populated during installation.
When you shutdown your database and start it up again and then access APEX with http://localhost:7778/pls/apex to see the query in invalid status?
Regards
Patrick
My Blog: http://www.inside-oracle-apex.com
APEX 4.0 Plug-Ins: http://apex.oracle.com/plugins
Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/patrickwolf

Every time I try to go to my homepage I get an error saying my url is invalid

every time I try to go to my home page I get the error, "url is invalid" Why is this happening? How do I validate my url?

What is the full URL of the home page?
See also:
*https://support.mozilla.org/kb/How+to+set+the+home+page

Why wont keychain access accept my login password

a pop up window states "safari wants to use keychain log-in password,"
but when i enter my log-in password it is invalid. why wont keychain
accept password?

When you get a request like that, the usual action you should take is to click on the "Allow" button.

ORA-01031: insufficient privileges in PL/SQL but not in SQL

I have problem with following situation.
I switched current schema to another one "ban", and selected 4 rows from "ed"
alter session set current_schema=ban;
SELECT * FROM ed.PS WHERE ROWNUM < 5;
the output is OK, and I get 4 rows like
ID_S ID_Z
1000152 1
1000153 1
1000154 1
1000155 1
but following procedure is compiled with warning
create or replace
procedure proc1
as
rowcnt int;
begin
select count(*) into rowcnt from ed.PS where rownum < 5;
end;
"Create procedure, executed in 0.031 sec."
5,29,PL/SQL: ORA-01031: insufficient privileges
5,2,PL/SQL: SQL Statement ignored
,,Total execution time 0.047 sec.
Could you help me why SELECT does work in SQL but not in PL/SQL procedure?
Thanks.
Message was edited by:
MattSk

Privs granted via a role are only valid from SQL - and not from/within stored PL/SQL code.
Quoting Tom's (from http://asktom.oracle.com) response to this:I did address this role thing in my book Expert one on one Oracle:
<quote>
What happens when we compile a Definer rights procedure
When we compile the procedure into the database, a couple of things happen with regards to
privileges. We will list them here briefly and then go into more detail:
q    All of the objects the procedure statically accesses (anything not accessed via dynamic SQL)
are verified for existence. Names are resolved via the standard scoping rules as they apply to the
definer of the procedure.
q    All of the objects it accesses are verified to ensure that the required access mode will be
available. That is, if an attempt to UPDATE T is made - Oracle will verify the definer or PUBLIC
has the ability to UPDATE T without use of any ROLES.
q    A dependency between this procedure and the referenced objects is setup and maintained. If
this procedure SELECTS FROM T, then a dependency between T and this procedure is recorded
If, for example, I have a procedure P that attempted to 'SELECT * FROM T', the compiler will first
resolve T into a fully qualified referenced. T is an ambiguous name in the database - there may be
many T's to choose from. Oracle will follow its scoping rules to figure out what T really is, any
synonyms will be resolved to their base objects and the schema name will be associated with the
object as well. It does this name resolution using the rules for the currently logged in user (the
definer). That is, it will look for an object owned by this user called T and use that first (this
includes private synonyms), then it will look at public synonyms and try to find T and so on.
Once it determines exactly what T refers to - Oracle will determine if the mode in which we are
attempting to access T is permitted.   In this case, if we as the definer of the procedure either
owns the object T or has been granted SELECT on T directly or PUBLIC was granted SELECT, the
procedure will compile. If we do not have access to an object called T by a direct grant - the
procedure P will fail compilation. So, when the object (the stored procedure that references T) is
compiled into the database, Oracle will do these checks - and if they "pass", Oracle will compile
the procedure, store the binary code for the procedure and set up a dependency between this
procedure and this object T. This dependency is used to invalidate the procedure later - in the
event something happens to T that necessitates the stored procedures recompilation. For example,
if at a later date - we REVOKE SELECT ON T from the owner of this stored procedure - Oracle will
mark all stored procedures this user has that are dependent on T, that refer to T, as INVALID. If
we ALTER T ADD some column, Oracle can invalidate all of the dependent procedures. This will cause
them to be recompiled automatically upon their next execution.
What is interesting to note is not only what is stored but what is not stored when we compile the
object. Oracle does not store the exact privilege that was used to get access to T. We only know
that procedure P is dependent on T. We do not know if the reason we were allowed to see T was due
to:
q    A grant given to the definer of the procedure (grant select on T to user)
q    A grant to public on T (grant select on T to public)
q    The user having the SELECT ANY TABLE privilege
The reason it is interesting to note what is not stored is that a REVOKE of any of the above will
cause the procedure P to become invalid. If all three privileges were in place when the procedure
was compiled, a revoke of ANY of them will invalidate the procedure - forcing it to be recompiled
before it is executed again. Since all three privileges were in place when we created the procedure
- it will compile successfully (until we revoke all three that is). This recompilation will happen
automatically the next time that the procedure is executed.
Now that the procedure is compiled into the database and the dependencies are all setup, we can
execute the procedure and be assured that it knows what T is and that T is accessible. If something
happens to either the table T or to the set of base privileges available to the definer of this
procedure that might affect our ability to access T -- our procedure will become invalid and will
need to be recompiled.
This leads into why ROLES are not enabled during the compilation and execution of a stored
procedure in Definer rights mode. Oracle is not storing exactly WHY you are allowed to access T -
only that you are. Any change to your privileges that might cause access to T to go away will cause
the procedure to become invalid and necessitate its recompilation. Without roles - that means only
'REVOKE SELECT ANY TABLE' or 'REVOKE SELECT ON T' from the Definer account or from PUBLIC. With
roles - it greatly expands the number of times we would invalidate this procedure. If some role
that was granted to some role that was granted to this user was modified, this procedure might go
invalid, even if we did not rely on that privilege from that role. ROLES are designed to be very
fluid when compared to GRANTS given to users as far as privilege sets go. For a minute, let's say
that roles did give us privileges in stored objects. Now, most any time anything was revoked from
ANY ROLE we had, or any role any role we have has (and so on -- roles can and are granted to roles)
-- many of our objects would become invalid. Think about that, REVOKE some privilege from a ROLE
and suddenly your entire database must be recompiled! Consider the impact of revoking some system
privilege from a ROLE, it would be like doing that to PUBLIC is now, don't do it, just think about
it (if you do revoke some powerful system privilege from PUBLIC, do it on a test database). If
PUBLIC had been granted SELECT ANY TABLE, revoking that privilege would cause virtually every
procedure in the database to go invalid. If procedures relied on roles, virtually every procedure
in the database would constantly become invalid due to small changes in permissions. Since one of
the major benefits of procedures is the 'compile once, run many' model - this would be disastrous
for performance.
Also consider that roles may be
q    Non-default: If I have a non-default role and I enable it and I compile a procedure that
relies on those privileges, when I log out I no longer have that role -- should my procedure become
invalid -- why? Why not? I could easily argue both sides.
q    Password Protected: if someone changes the password on a ROLE, should everything that might
need that role be recompiled? I might be granted that role but not knowing the new password - I
can no longer enable it. Should the privileges still be available? Why or Why not? Again, arguing
either side of this is easy. There are cases for and against each.
The bottom line with respect to roles in procedures with Definer rights are:
q    You have thousands or tens of thousands of end users. They don't create stored objects (they
should not). We need roles to manage these people. Roles are designed for these people (end users).
q    You have far fewer application schema's (things that hold stored objects). For these we want
to be explicit as to exactly what privileges we need and why. In security terms this is called the
concept of 'least privileges', you want to specifically say what privilege you need and why you
need it. If you inherit lots of privileges from roles you cannot do that effectively. We can manage
to be explicit since the number of development schemas is SMALL (but the number of end users is
large)...
q    Having the direct relationship between the definer and the procedure makes for a much more
efficient database. We recompile objects only when we need to, not when we might need to. It is a
large efficiency enhancement.
</quote>

Free ePocrates Rx Pro offer from BlackBerry - I can't register my device!?!

I am a previous Palm user but now purchased a BlackBerry as my new device because of an offer for a free ePocrates Rx Pro (a medical software program) subscription with a new BlackBerry purchase.
http://www.blackberry.com/select/smb/healthcare/offers.shtml
https://www.blackberry.com/HealthCareOffer/index.do
However, I am unable to get the promised ePocrates subscription, because the registration website keeps giving me an error message of "First IMEI invalid" when I try to register my new, activated device - with the CORRECT IMEI number. There is notechnical support contact information listed anywhere.
According to the offer guidelines, I have to register within 14 days of the purchase, which will expire tomorrow as I have been trying unsuccesssfully to register for two weeks now.
Could somebody help me with this problem?
I hope that the BlackBerry offer was real!!!

you can contact ePocrates here, I found it wo clicks away from the first link you gave us.
http://www.epocrates.com/company/contact/
The search box on top-right of this page is your true friend, and the public Knowledge Base too:

I have a problem in the itunes

I have a problem in the itunes when i try to update any a Application Because my billing info
and i try to put my security code but every time is invalid ,,, why ???

Your card issuer is rejecting your card. You need to contact them.

IMEI invalid, why?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for