IMessage Multiple Threads

Hi, I have a slightly annoying "issue" with iMessage and I wondered if it was possible to solve it.
Here's the deal:
I text my girlfriend from my iPhone 4S (iOS 5.0.1) to her Android (HTC ChaCha) device over SMS.
I also text my girlfriend from my iPhone 4S to her iPod Touch (iOS 5.0.1) over iMessage.
Her e-mail address which she uses for iMessage and her cell phone number (from her SIM card in her Android device) are saved in the same contact person.
These 2 different texts however appear in 2 different threads in Messages: one for the iMessages and one for the SMS.
Is it possible to make my iPhone merge these threads this by changing some setting or contact information?
Thank you for reading this,
Tomas
P.S.: English isn't my mother language, I apologize in advance for any possible errors.

This happens with me as well.
Messages has 2 threads with the 3 same people. The group threads are named the same. Messages will appear in one of the 2 threads with no regular pattern. Deleting 1 group deletes that message history but can temporarily relieve the problem.
On my Macbook running Mavericks there is a single group. I have never had the multiple group problem on my Macbook Messages app. This only appears to happen on Messages on iOS 7 and 8.

Similar Messages

Can I combine multiple threads from the same contact in iMessage?

iMessage displays multiple threads for the same contact. Its very confusing and has resulted in lost messages. I've tried changing a number of settings but to no avail. Seems to require everyone in my contact list to eliminate all their email addresses in iMessage.
Begs the question why does iMessage even need this information? Worse, why does it suck it into its settings by default. The directory server should only require a valid Apple ID (associated with the users' devices) in order to direct an iMessage between two contacts.

Thanks for the reply, appreciate your input. I did find another way of doing it and that is to highlight the first e-mail, hold down the shift key and click on the last one. That highlights them all and then they can all be deleted. Your ideas also work of course and I thank you for that. Cheers.

Why is iMessage splitting group conversations into multiple threads after upgrading to iOS 8?

After upgrading to iOS 8 my group messages keep getting split up into different threads. Everybody in the threads have iPhones and before upgrading they were all working and sending/receiving iMessages just fine.
Now I'll have 2-3 threads with the same contacts (using their same phone numbers, not another contact point like iCloud email, Apple ID, etc.). My phone sometimes recognizes that the group is the same because it will automatically name the group the same thing, but other times it just puts the names of the people in the "To" line. In addition, some of the threads won't let me send iMessage so I have to reply in one thread and receive messages in the other (I send iMessages in thread A but the replies from the same people come back in thread B, but if I try and reply in thread B I can only send text messages even though all contact info is the same).
Update after OS X Yosemite: After upgrading to Yosemite, my Messages app on my MacBook Pro is now splitting the threads as well. It used to be that the computer understood the contacts were the same so all messages should be under one thread and just my phone was having this issue, but the upgrade changed that.
I have tried signing in and out of iMessage, upgrading to the latest iOS, turning on and off my phone, starting new groups, only replying to certain groups, etc. but nothing has worked.
Thanks!

Im having the same problem. This started with iOS 8 and Yosemite. Im in a group message with 10 people with and without iPhones. Currently have 9 threads and when ever a new person responds a new thread forms. they all have the same people but in a different order, that may be part of the reason why iMessage doesn't recognize them as the same conversation.
As I'm writing this post 3 new threads opened and other people with and without iPhones are mentioning the same problem
hope apple can fix this. VERY annoying

How to protect the creation of a db across multiple threads/processes?

Given a multi-process, multi-threaded application, and one database file to be created, how can I guarantee that only one of the threads in one of the processes successfully creates the database, when ALL of the threads are going to either attempt to create it, or open it (if it already exists) upon startup?
My current logic for all threads is:
set open flags to DB_THREAD
start transaction
attempt to open the db
if ENOENT
abort transaction
change open flags to DB_CREATE | DB_EXCL | DB_THREAD
retry
else if EEXIST
abort transaction
change open flags to DB_THREAD
retry
else if !ok
# some other error
end
commit transaction
I'm testing on Linux right now, with plans to move to Windows, AIX, and Solaris. What I'm experiencing on Linux is several of the threads (out of 10 threads I'm testing) will succeed in creating the database. The others will receive either either succeed in opening the first time through, or will receive the EEXIST when they do the open w/ create flags - ultimately, they open the same created db (I'm presuming the last one that's created by one of the other threads). Effectively, the open with DB_CREATE | DB_EXCL is not ensuring that only one DB is created. I was under the impression that opening in a transaction would guarantee this, but it does not, or maybe I'm doing something incorrectly?
Should DB_CREATE | DB_EXCL and opening in a transaction guarantee that only one thread can create the database? Do I need to use another synchronization method?
Note: I am running off of a local disk, not over NFS or anything like that.
I tried taking out my transaction and using DB_AUTO_COMMIT instead, still no go - multiple threads still report they successfully created the DB. Using BDB 4.5.
Thanks,
Kevin Burge

Brian,
Thanks for the reply. I think I'm doing what you said, unless I'm misunderstanding. I do have all threads try to do the DB_CREATE | DB_EXCL. Are you saying I shouldn't use the DB_EXCL flag?
The problem I was seeing with 10 threads calling open w/ DB_CREATE | DB_EXCL on the same db:
* Between 1 and 9 threads would return success from db->open with the creation flags.... but the last one to create "wins".
* All the other threads would get EEXIST, as expected.
The threads that "lost", do get a successful return code from "open" with the create flags, but all data written to them is lost. They act normally except for the fact that the have a deleted file-handle that they are writing to. There's no indicator that records written to them are going into the void.
My test:
I had 10 threads each trying to create or open a recno db, then append 10 records, for a total of 100 records expected. Ultimately, I would end up with between 20 to 100 records in the db, depending on how many of the threads said they successfully created the db. So, if 5 threads said they created the db successfully, then 40 records would be missing, because 4 of those threads were writing to deleted file handles. If 2 threads said they created the db, then 10 records would be missing....If 8 threads, then 70 records missing, etc.
In other words, multiple threads creating the db appears to work correctly, because there are no errors. It was the missing records that caught my attention, and prompted my question on this forum.
For what it's worth, I've worked around the problem by opening a similarly named file via the open() system call, with O_CREAT|O_EXCL, which is guaranteed to be atomic. The first thread that can create this temp file is the only thread that can actually create the db - all others sleep upon open with ENOENT until it's created.
Thanks,
Kevin

Multiple Thread of a xml publisher report - messed up fonts in the PDF out

We are running 60000 invoices at a given time. In order to get the job done faster, the xml publisher report is set up to run mulitple threads. Each thread running unique set of invoices.
I am seeing this issue, randomly.
The pdf output of the invoice is having the fonts messed up. font 10 shows up as 14 and the invoice looks very bad.
When i rerun the same set of invoices it looks absolutely normal.
Also if I retrieve the xml output of the bad pdf and view it through the xmlpub desktop, it looks perfectly fine.
Two times we saw this issue
PRODUCTION
- when i run 8 threads, i saw this issue in one of the thread and affected one invoice. (Production- 1 concurrent processing node+ 5 OPP processes and 5 threads + MEMORY is J:oracle.apps.fnd.cp.gsf.GSMServiceController:-mx3072m )
TEST INSTANCE
- when i ran with 16 threads, one of the thread running xml pub report affected all the invoices (UAT environment-1 concurrent processing node+ 7 OPP processes and 1 threads + MEMORY is J:oracle.apps.fnd.cp.gsf.GSMServiceController:-mx3072m )
Looks like it is happening when running multiple threads.
The formatting command or information is getting lost somewhere and the report is all messed up.
Please advise.
Thanks
SJ

Really appreciate your response. Can you pls give little more details.
1] Are there any standard API's which I can use to submit XML publisher report from the JSP pages
2]Is there any sample code snippet for any of the options that I can refer to..or pls let me know the API's, I will check on them
Appreciate any help

PrinterException when multiple threads try to print report using JRC

Iam using Crystal Report's JRC for printing reports, it works fine.
But the problem araises when i use multiple threads.
I used the following:
reportClientDocument.getPrinterOutputController().printReport(.....); to print.
I get the following exception
Caused by: java.awt.print.PrinterException: No printer named "\\ch03\printer05" could be found.
Without multiple thread it works fine.
I have been scratching my head for days on this problem, any help is very much appreciated..

If an API doesn't specifically say that it is thread safe then it isn't likely to be thread safe and the only way to approach it is to assume that it isn't.

How do i use multiple threads( very much real time), using JavaFX?

I'm creating an application, using JavaFX because one can create awesome GUI using JavaFX. I need to know how to create real time multiple threads using javafx.
JavaFX doesn't support creation of multiple threads, but i think there is another way of doing it. I need it work in real time as my application works with an hardware (wacom intous 3 tablet), and i need mutiple threads to get all the parameters from the stylus of the tablet simultaneously...
any code which will help me out or explaination on how to go about this is appreciated...
Help required quickly...

See example at
[http://jfxstudio.wordpress.com/2009/06/09/asynchronous-operations-in-javafx/|http://jfxstudio.wordpress.com/2009/06/09/asynchronous-operations-in-javafx/]

Problem with multiple threads accessing the same Image

I'm trying to draw into one Image from multiple threads. It works fine for a while, but then suddenly, the image stops updating. Threads are still running but the image won't update. I'm using doublebuffering and threads are simply drawing counters into Image with different speed.
It seems like the Image gets deadlocked or something. Anyone have any idea what's behind this behavior or perhaps better solution to do such thing.
Any help will be appreciated.

Sorry Kglad, I didn't mean to be rude. With "No coding
errors" I meant the animation itself runs with no errors. I'm sure
you could run the 20 instances with no freezing (that's why I put
the post :) ) But I'm affraid it is an animation for a client, so I
cannot distribute the code.
Perhaps I didnt explain the situation clearly enough (in part
because of my poor english...).-
- By 20 instances I mean 20 separated embedded objects in the
html
- The animation is relatively simple. A turned on candle, in
each cycle I calculate the next position of the flame (that
oscilates from left to right). The flame is composed by 4
concentric gradients. There is NO loops, only an 'onEnterFrame'
function refreshing the flame each time.
- It's true that I got plenty variables at the _root level.
If that could be the problem, how can I workaround it?
- It is my first time trying to embed so many objects at the
same time too. No idea if the problem could be the way I embed the
object from the html :(
- The only thing I can guess is that when a cycle of one of
the object is running, the other 19 objects must wait their turn.
That would explain why the more instances I run, the worst results
I get. In that case, I wonder if there's a way to run them in a
kind of asynchronous mode, just guessing...
Any other comment would be appreciated. Anyway, thanks a lot
everybody for your colaboration.

How to use multiple threads and swing for displaying status/interaction

I have a Swing-app which have to show progress and allow userinteraction for these tasks:
* First:
retrieve a list of IDs(String) from the database (single thread running)
* Second:
some work on the id-list and list written to hd (same thread as above)
* Third:
retrieve Objects (based on the id-list) from different sources (Multiple Threads are running)
To show the status I have a JProgressBar (indeterminate while task1&2 running) and
a JTextArea showing the current status (connect,retrieve list, sort, ...)
When task3 is starting the JTextArea have to disappear and be replaced by a ScrollPane
with an array of Labels/TextAreas showing the status of each thread.
While theses threads are working, the ID-list will be consumed and the JProgressBar
shows the remaining precentage of the hole progress.
Everything is working so far (excepts UI :) , the problem(s) I have:
I need the threads to interacts with the user through the ui. e.g: "Connection to db-xyz lost! reconnect?"
But I don´t know how to do this correctly.
I think one way would be to send an event to the ui... but how?
(the ui must know which thread is calling to unpause it after user answered)
I know that threads should NOT change the swing(-container) - How do I notify the ui that a thread has a question?
Since these threads are really time-consuming the UI is not updated frequently,
how can I increase this? (perhaps using another thread-priority?)
thanks for help!

if/when your threads need to interact with the UI, they can create a Runnable & send it to SwingUtilities.invokeLater or invokeAndWait. This Runnable can popup a message to the user, and act on the choice of the user (reconnect, cancel, ...). This action could be something which "unpauses" the task thread.
You may need to do synchronisation between the code in the Runnable & the Thread to which it is related - so the latter Thread knows when the user has made the choice.

Suddenly, I've been put on multiple threads over multiple firefox problems, which is filling up my inbox. How do I get out of these?

Details? I posted a question about one problem (for which no answers have been offered, but that's okay) and somehow, I've become part of multiple threads about various firefox problems. I have no interest in any of these questions/problems.
How do I get out of these threads? I get about 15-20 emails a day! Firefox is by far the worst community I've even been dragged into....

Sorry you are having problems.
Have a look at your settings in the dropdown from the username or https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/users/settings
Not too sure what you could subscribe to accidentally that causes that behaviour though.
It would be interesting to know what option caused all the email. If something has gone wrong and you are getting e-mails that you should not be getting we can refer this to the admins to look into. The Firefox sumo community certainly does not intentionally spam, and if you are having a problem lets find out more, because others may have a problem and not have reported it.

Multiple threads access the same method.

Hello,
I have been trying for a long time to find out multiple threads access the shared data.
I have written a sample code, there I my intention is that method has to be accessed
onlny one thread at a time., mean one thread finished the job, then next thread can
access the shared source. But for this code I am not getting the desired out put what I want. But if I am using synchronized block I am getting the output. Please correct where I got mistake. Please see my code.
public class TestThread implements Runnable {
     Shared r;
     public TestThread() {
          r = new Shared();
     public static void main(String args[]) {
          Thread t1 = new Thread(new TestThread());
          Thread t2 = new Thread(new TestThread());
          t1.setName("A");
          t2.setName("B");
          t1.start();
          t2.start();
      * (non-Javadoc)
      * @see java.lang.Runnable#run()
     @Override
     public void run() {
          // TODO Auto-generated method stub
          r.count();
class Shared {
     public synchronized void count() {
          String name = Thread.currentThread().getName();
          System.out.println(name + ":accessed...");
          try {
               for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
                    System.out.println(name + ": " + i);
          } catch (Exception e) {
               // TODO: handle exception
}Thanks
Bhanu lakshmi.

It depends on what you synchronize. Non-static methods synchronize on the object, so if you're using several objects, you'll be able to call each from their own thread.
Make your method synchronized or use only a single object and see the difference.

Can multiple threads write to the database?

I am a little confused from the statement in the documentation: "Berkeley DB Data Store does not support locking, and hence does not guarantee correct behavior if more than one thread of control is updating the database at a time."
1. Can multiple threads write to the "Simple Data Store"?
2. Considering the sample code below which writes to the DB using 5 threads - is there a possibility of data loss?
3. If the code will cause data loss, will adding DB_INIT_LOCK and/or DB_INIT_TXN in DBENV->open make any difference?
#include "stdafx.h"
#include <stdio.h>
#include <windows.h>
#include <db.h>
static DB *db = NULL;
static DB_ENV *dbEnv = NULL;
DWORD WINAPI th_write(LPVOID lpParam)
DBT key, data;
char key_buff[32], data_buff[32];
DWORD i;
printf("thread(%s) - start\n", lpParam);
for (i = 0; i < 200; ++i)
memset(&key, 0, sizeof(key));
memset(&data, 0, sizeof(data));
sprintf(key_buff, "K:%s", lpParam);
sprintf(data_buff, "D:%s:%8d", lpParam, i);
key.data = key_buff;
key.size = strlen(key_buff);
data.data = data_buff;
data.size = strlen(data_buff);
db->put(db, NULL, &key, &data, 0);
Sleep(5);
printf("thread(%s) - End\n", lpParam);
return 0;
int main()
db_env_create(&dbEnv, 0);
dbEnv->open(dbEnv, NULL, DB_CREATE | DB_INIT_MPOOL | DB_THREAD, 0);
db_create(&db, dbEnv, 0);
db->open(db, NULL, "test.db", NULL, DB_BTREE, DB_CREATE, 0);
CreateThread(NULL, 0, th_write, "A", 0, 0);
CreateThread(NULL, 0, th_write, "B", 0, 0);
CreateThread(NULL, 0, th_write, "B", 0, 0);
CreateThread(NULL, 0, th_write, "C", 0, 0);
th_write("C");
Sleep(2000);
}

Here some clarification about BDB Lock and Multi threads behavior
Question 1. Can multiple threads write to the "Simple Data Store"?
Answer 1.
Please Refer to http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E17076_02/html/programmer_reference/intro_products.html
A Data Store (DS) set up
(so not using an environment or using one, but without any of the DB_INIT_LOCK, DB_INIT_TXN, DB_INIT_LOG environment regions related flags specified
each corresponding to the appropriate subsystem, locking, transaction, logging)
will not guard against data corruption due to accessing the same database page and overwriting the same records, corrupting the internal structure of the database etc.
(note that in the case of the Btree, Hash and Recno access methods we lock at the database page level, only for the Queue access method we lock at record level)
So,
if You want to have multiple threads in the application writing concurrently or in parallel to the same database You need to use locking (and properly handle any potential deadlocks),
otherwise You risk corrupting the data itself or the database (its internal structure).
Of course , If You serialize at the application level the access to the database, so that no more one threads writes to the database at a time, there will be no need for locking.
But obviously this is likely not the behavior You want.
Hence, You need to use either a CDS (Concurrent Data Store) or TDS (Transactional Data Store) set up.
See the table comparing the various set ups, here: http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E17076_02/html/programmer_reference/intro_products.html
Berkeley DB Data Store
The Berkeley DB Data Store product is an embeddable, high-performance data store. This product supports multiple concurrent threads of control, including multiple processes and multiple threads of control within a process. However, Berkeley DB Data Store does not support locking, and hence does not guarantee correct behavior if more than one thread of control is updating the database at a time. The Berkeley DB Data Store is intended for use in read-only applications or applications which can guarantee no more than one thread of control updates the database at a time.
Berkeley DB Concurrent Data Store
The Berkeley DB Concurrent Data Store product adds multiple-reader, single writer capabilities to the Berkeley DB Data Store product. This product provides built-in concurrency and locking feature. Berkeley DB Concurrent Data Store is intended for applications that need support for concurrent updates to a database that is largely used for reading.
Berkeley DB Transactional Data Store
The Berkeley DB Transactional Data Store product adds support for transactions and database recovery. Berkeley DB Transactional Data Store is intended for applications that require industrial-strength database services, including excellent performance under high-concurrency workloads of read and write operations, the ability to commit or roll back multiple changes to the database at a single instant, and the guarantee that in the event of a catastrophic system or hardware failure, all committed database changes are preserved.
So, clearly DS is not a solution for this case, where multiple threads need to write simultaneously to the database.
CDS (Concurrent Data Store) provides locking features, but only for multiple-reader/single-writer scenarios. You use CDS when you specify the DB_INIT_CDB flag when opening the BDB environment: http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E17076_02/html/api_reference/C/envopen.html#envopen_DB_INIT_CDB
TDS (Transactional Data Store) provides locking features, adds complete ACID support for transactions and offers recoverability guarantees. You use TDS when you specify the DB_INIT_TXN and DB_INIT_LOG flags when opening the environment. To have locking support, you would need to also specify the DB_INIT_LOCK flag.
Now, since the requirement is to have multiple writers (multi-threaded writes to the database),
then TDS would be the way to go (CDS is useful only in single-writer scenarios, when there are no needs for recoverability).
To Summarize
The best way to have an understanding of what set up is needed, it is to answer the following questions:
- What is the data access scenario? Is it multiple writer threads? Will the writers access the database simultaneously?
- Are recoverability/data durability, atomicity of operations and data isolation important for the application? http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E17076_02/html/programmer_reference/transapp_why.html
If the answers are yes, then TDS should be used, and the environment should be opened like this:
dbEnv->open(dbEnv, ENV_HOME, DB_CREATE | DB_INIT_MPOOL | DB_INIT_LOCK | DB_INIT_TXN | DB_INIT_LOG | DB_RECOVER | DB_THREAD, 0);
(where ENV_HOME is the filesystem directory where the BDB environment will be created)
Question 2. Considering the sample code below which writes to the DB using 5 threads - is there a possibility of data loss?
Answer 2.
Definitely yes, You can see data loss and/or data corruption.
You can check the behavior of your testcase in the following way
1. Run your testcase
2.After the program exits
run db_verify to verify the database (db_verify -o test.db).
You will likely see db_verify complaining, unless the thread scheduler on Windows weirdly starts each thread one after the other,
IOW no two or ore threads write to the database at the same time -- kind of serializing the writes
Question 3. If the code will cause data loss, will adding DB_INIT_LOCK and/or DB_INIT_TXN in DBENV->open make any difference?
Answer 3.
In Your case the TDS should be used, and the environment should be opened like this:
dbEnv->open(dbEnv, ENV_HOME, DB_CREATE | DB_INIT_MPOOL | DB_INIT_LOCK | DB_INIT_TXN | DB_INIT_LOG | DB_RECOVER | DB_THREAD, 0);
(where ENV_HOME is the filesystem directory where the BDB environment will be created)
doing this You have proper deadlock handling in place and proper transaction usage
so
You are protected against potential data corruption/data loss.
see http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E17076_02/html/gsg_txn/C/BerkeleyDB-Core-C-Txn.pdf
Multi-threaded and Multi-process Applications
DB is designed to support multi-threaded and multi-process applications, but their usage
means you must pay careful attention to issues of concurrency. Transactions help your
application's concurrency by providing various levels of isolation for your threads of control. In
addition, DB provides mechanisms that allow you to detect and respond to deadlocks.
Isolation means that database modifications made by one transaction will not normally be
seen by readers from another transaction until the first commits its changes. Different threads
use different transaction handles, so this mechanism is normally used to provide isolation
between database operations performed by different threads.
Note that DB supports different isolation levels. For example, you can configure your
application to see uncommitted reads, which means that one transaction can see data that
has been modified but not yet committed by another transaction. Doing this might mean
your transaction reads data "dirtied" by another transaction, but which subsequently might
change before that other transaction commits its changes. On the other hand, lowering your
isolation requirements means that your application can experience improved throughput due
to reduced lock contention.
For more information on concurrency, on managing isolation levels, and on deadlock
detection, see Concurrency (page 32).

Berkeley DB Java Edition - multiple threads accessing database

Hi,
I would like to access (read & write) a Berkeley DB from multiple threads (all same process/jvm).
Should I use a single com.sleepycat.je.Database object for all threads, or should I create an instance for each?
Or is there any other way of doing it?
Thanks

The Database object may be used by multiple threads, so you can use a single instance or multiple ones, as best suits you. From http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E17277_02/html/java/com/sleepycat/je/Database.html,
Database handles are free-threaded and may be used concurrently by multiple threads. 'If you read through the javadoc, you'll find other notes on using classes from multiple threads.
Regards,
Linda

How to proces the record in Table with multiple threads using Pl/Sql & Java

I have a table containing millions of records in it; and numbers of records also keep on increasing because of a high speed process populating this table.
I want to process this table using multiple threads of java. But the condition is that each records should process only once by any of the thread. And after processing I need to delete that record from the table.
Here is what I am thinking. I will put the code to process the records in PL/SQL procedure and call it by multiple threads of Java to make the processing concurrent.
Java Thread.1 }
Java Thread.2 }
.....................} -------------> PL/SQL Procedure to process and delete Records ------> <<<Table >>>
Java Thread.n }
But the problem is how can I restrict a record not to pick by another thread while processing(So it should not processed multiple times) ?
I am very much familiar with PL/SQL code. Only issue I am facing is How to fetch/process/delete the record only once.
I can change the structure of table to add any new column if needed.
Thanks in advance.
Edited by: abhisheak123 on Aug 2, 2009 11:29 PM

Check if you can use the bucket logic in your PLSQL code..
By bucket I mean if you can make multiple buckets of your data to be processed so that each bucket contains the different rows and then call the PLSQL process in parallel.
Lets say there is a column create_date and processed_flag in your table.
Your PLSQL code should take 2 parameters start_date and end_date.
Now if you want to process data say between 01-Jan to 06-Jan, a wrapper program should first create 6 buckets each of one day and then call PLSQL proc in parallel for these 6 different buckets.
Regards
Arun

Is there any problem to use multiple threads to send email with JavaMail

Dear all,
I am using JavaMail 1.3.2 to send emails with SMTP, it works very well for a long time.
But one day, I found that the email service hanged and I could never send email again until I restart the tomcat. I found that the reason was a deadlock had been created, the required resource for sending email had not been released.
I guess the error is due to multiple threads are sending email at the same time. I made a test to create seperate thread for sending each email. After few days, I found this deadlock happened again. So, my question is: Can I use JavaMail with multiple threads? If not, I may need to sychronized all the thread that using JavaMail. I would like to make sure this is the reason for causing the deadlock problem.
Here is part of my code for using JavaMail:
transport = session.getTransport("smtp");
transport.connect(email_host, smtp_user, smtp_pass);
message.saveChanges();
transport.sendMessage(message,message.getAllRecipients());
which is very standard call, and it worked well for a long time.
Here is part for my thread dump on tomcat:
(Thread-339)
- waiting to lock <0x5447c180> (a sun.nio.cs.StandardCharsets)
(Thread-342)
- locked <0x5447c180> (a sun.nio.cs.StandardCharsets)
It seems that these happened after call the method transport.sendMessage() or message.updateChanges()
, and the underlying implementation may require the JRE StandardCharsets object. But the object had been locked and never be released. So, the sendMessage() or updateChanges() can't be completed.
Please give me some helps if you have any idea about it.
Thanks very much!
Sirius

Note that the Nightly build gets updated daily (and sometimes more than once in case of a respin) and it is always possible that something goes wrong and it doesn't work properly, so be prepared for issues if you decide to stay with the Nightly build and make sure to have the current release with its own profile installed as well in case of problems.
See also:
* http://kb.mozillazine.org/Testing_pre-release_versions
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Creating_a_new_Firefox_profile_on_Windows
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Shortcut_to_a_specific_profile
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Using_multiple_profiles_-_Firefox

IMessage Multiple Threads

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for