Implementing Source Control

Hi All,
I am new to team development environment of Weblogic. I have setup a CVS repository for my Weblogic portal application. How can other users access the same from their machine. Is there any option to connect to the repository from Weblogic Workshop? How can I get a latest version of a file from CVS through Workshop?
Thanks in advance.
Ajish

Thanks William,
Regarding "associated updates"
The process we followed is covered in the following links:
http://forums.adobe.com/thread/226305?tstart=1
http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/508/cpsid_50857.html
http://www.leinius.de/blog/category/Team-Foundation-Server.aspx
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/tfsversioncontrol/thread/6e020f2c-9356-40b0- 9baf-16dd74c9b52b
So your saying you could use labelled versions to store the various releases of the help. I'll certainly have a look at that. What we're trying to achieve here is to first match and then exceed the benefits of doing all this manually. It's also worth noting that the TA team is basically me and one contractor and likely to remain so. Having said that I like most of what I've seen in TFS epecially commenting changes and then being able to list changes..

Similar Messages

Timed Loop timing source - Control Loop From Task is too slow

I'm trying to make a Timed Loop run at a period of 2 ms, with an analog input task running at 50 kHz as timing source. The input analog signal is scaled and fed into a synchronised analog output task on the same multifunction DAQ board. Using the built-in 1 kHz or 1 MHz clock as timing source for the Timed Loop works great, except for a slight time lag between the loop and my AI/AO tasks which over time becomes unacceptable because my task will be running for up to an hour. However, when I use the DAQmx Create Timing Source: Control Loop From Task vi to create a timing source, everything slows down and the fastest loop time I can get is around 20 ms. Any suggestions to get around this would be highly appreciated!
System: LabVIEW RT 8.0 with DAQmx 8.0 running on an NI PXI-8186; NI PXI-6251 used for analog input.

You're welcome!
You can build an array, and if your data is not hugh (100's of MB) this may be the easiest solution. However, we aways suggest implementing the Producer/Consumer Architecture. Keep the PID in the Producer loop, but move the File IO to the Consumer. Also, it appears that your instrument uses some form of serial communication, so that could cause lags in your system....
What is your application about in general, what performance are you hoping for, etc?
Joshua B.
National Instruments
NI Services
NI Support Resources
NI Training Resources

Looking For Guidance: Best Practices for Source Control of Database Assets

Database Version: 11.2.0.3
OS: RHEL 6.2
Source Control: subversion
This is a general question aimed at database professionals, however, it is not specific to any oracle version, etc. Its a leadership question for other Oracle shops regarding source control.
The current trunk, in my client's source control, is the implementation of a previous employee who used ER Studio. After walking the batch scripts and subordinate files , it was determined that there would be no formal or elegant way to recreate the current version of the database from our source control - the engineers who have contributed to these assets are no longer employed or available for consulting. The batch scripts are stale, if you will.
To clean this up and to leverage best practices, I need some guidance on whether or not to baseline the current repository and how to move forward with additions of assets; tables, procs, pkgs, etc. I'm really interested in how larger oracle shops organize their repository - what directories do you use, how are they labeled...are they labeled with respect to version?
Assumptions:
1. repository (database assets only) needs to be baselined (?)
2. I have approval to change this database directory under the trunk to support best practices and get the client steered straight in terms of recovery and
Knowns:
1. the current application version in the database is 5.11.0 (that's my client's application version)
2. this is for one schema/user of a database (other schemas under the database belong to different trunks)
This is the layout that we currently have and for the privacy of the
client I've made this rather generic. I'd love to have a fresh
start...how do I go about doing that...initially, I like using
SqlDeveloper's ability to create sql scripts from a connected target.
product_name
|_trunk
     |_database
       |_config
       |_data
       |_database
       |_integration
       |_patch
       |   |_5.2A.2
       |   |_5.2A.4
       |   |_5.3.0
       |   |_5.3.1
       |
       |_scripts
       |   |_config
       |   |_logs
       |
       |_server
Thank you in advance.

HiWe are using Data ONTAP 8.2.3p3 on our FAS8020 in 7-mode and we have 2 aggregates, a SATA and SAS aggregate. I want to decommission the SATA aggregate as I want to move that tray to another site. If I have a flexvol containing 3 qtrees CIFS shares can I use data motion (vol copy) to move the flex vol on the same controller but to a different aggregate without major downtime? I know this article is old and it says here that CIFS are not supported however I am reading mix message that on the version of data ONTAP we are now on does support CIFS and data motion however there will be a small downtime with the CIFS share terminating. Is this correct? Thanks

Integrated Source Control doesn't honor given username after restart of LabVIEW

I don't really like the integrated Source Control of LabVIEW 8.20 due to some missing features and failures which happen. But for a presentation I had to get some practical information. As SCC API provider I selected Microsoft Visual Source Safe for an example project. While playing around I noticed following bug in the implementation for LabVIEW.
All given information to access the SCC provider is saved inside 'labview.ini' (which is IMO not the correct place, especially when you are working with different projects). As user I selected 'admin' and not the logged on system user. Access to the repository is granted within the current session and I can do all operations. But if you restart LabVIEW it cannot access the repository because it uses the system user and not the given username to log into the repository.
If you wan't to work with the integrated Source Control each user who should get access to the repository should have an own user account with the same username as his Windows account.
This is one of a number of bugs since a couple of versions which don't let me use the integrated Source Control.
Henrik

Due to following items I don't want to work with the integrated source control:
1. All SCC options are stored inside the file 'labview.ini'. That makes you unimpossible to work with different projects without reconfiguring the SCC again and again. Each project should hold it's own SCC options which overrides the LabVIEW global SCC options. If you are working without projects the global SCC options should be used.
2. If you don't have access to the repository (e.g. network disconnected) you get an error message each time you open a vi (last tested with 8.0 a long time ago). LabVIEW should silently fail and give me at maximum one alert that the connection to the repository cannot be established. Opening the SCC options you can see that everyting is resetted while the correct configuration is still located inside the 'labview.ini'. You have to delete them manually inside the configuration file.
Both parts are already reported to NI in february last year.
3. Comparing two different versions of one file is not working unless you compare the current local version with the latest version inside the repository. Using subversion I can do that by integrating metadiff and lvdiff. It is more than helpful.
4. You have to use an external scc client to create a branch or tag.
5. That's a personal thing but I like the way of using update/commit instead of checkout/checkin.
Dunno if I remember all the things I missed while testing the integrated source control some time ago.
Henrik

Do I need Robohelp Server or Source Control? and RH installation

So, I'm still comparing authoring products and trying to filter down requirements.
I've been reading more about RH and have come across RH Server and source Control and wondering exactly if they are needed.
I'm the single author in the company, most likely publishing web help, or html help outputs for use online via our web application.
Is there any need to implement Server or source control, as far as I can see Server gives me reporting abilities and statistic reports, neither of which I really need. Is there anything else about RH Server that would be beneficial?
Also, source control, this is more needed when there are multiple writers accessing the same content at the same time so that problems dont crop up? Correct?
Also, how difficult, or time consuming is the installation process of RH on a single machine. Is it a simple program installation, or will I need to install server-side databases or anything else that could require the IT team to get involved?
Thanks for your help.
Nick

Hi Nick.
You have got it pretty much spot on. RoboHelp Server is mainly only required if you want the additional reporting functionality. There are some other minor differences between RoboHelp and RoboHelp Server but that is the main one. RoboSource Control is a application to get source files safe and backed up and is designed for a multi-author environment. It adds a layer of complexity for a single author environment although you can still use it if you wish. Personally I'd just ensure you have your source on a local drive (a key requirement of RoboHelp) and backup to a network drive.
The installation of RoboHelp is painless. It is just like any other application with a wizard to guide you. It has various options that you can choose, one of which is whether to install the RoboSourceControl client.
Click here for further reading on the difference between RoboHelp Server and RoboSourceControl.
Read the RoboColum(n).

Visual Studio 2013 slows down + crashes when using Source Control features.

I have spent two full days trying to resolve this issue but no luck so here we go,
I have created a project using Visual Studio Team Foundation Server plug-in in the past. Later on I switched to
Microsoft Git Provider.
Now when I connect to that project in the Team Explorer and double click on the solution to work on it locally it somehow changes the plug in to Microsoft Git Provider automatically and of course I can't
Commit/Commit and Push since I receive following error in the Team Explorer,
An error occurred. Detailed message: Failed to open directory 'C:/Users/.../AppData/Local/Application Data/'
Manually changing the plug-in to the Visual Studio Team Foundation Server
results in a broken Team Explorer as below,
With Settings leading to an empty pane, and also a warning in the Team Explorer's Changes page telling me the message below if I click on Pending Changes...
Microsoft Git Provider is not the current Source Control plug-in. Change Plug-in
And manually selecting the solution from Solution Explorer, right click and
Add Solution to Source Control, leads to never ending hour glass and (Not responding) visual studio.
New Projects
Creating a new project is straight forward, unless I "Add to Source Control" is checked. If so, again never ending process if Microsoft TFS plug-in is selected in the tools and eventually me Ending the Visual Studio task. And a VERY long process
(40+ mins) if I have chosen Microsoft Git but that finishes successfully rather.
New TFS project from Team Explorer
If I create a new project in my Online Web Studio
Click on Open with Visual Studio Link => Opens and connects to a my newly created TFS in team explorer.
Clicking new in Team Explorer under Solutions to create a new solution and bind it to this Repo
leads to straight crash of Visual Studio and restarting attempt of VS.
So I really can't use Source Control from visual studio other than cloning GitHub's existing repo's on Visual Studio and Committing my current Microsoft Git managed projects.
I have attempted
Repairing Visual Studio (no luck in results)
Devenv.exe /setup (no luck)
Trying to scrap the SCC info on my solution then at least it won't get picked up by source control then I can Check it in as a new project. (no luck and the solution picks the Microsoft Git upon opening it by clicking on the .sln file.) I have followed
these steps in this stack overflow answer.
And lots of mucking around like removing my workspaces almost Thousand times and putting them back, binding and etc.
I am really stuck on this and it's holding me back from staring a new project (which is problematic using Adding to Source Control) and unfortunately is dependent on the old project (which is developed under Visual Studio Team Foundation Server Plug-in which
is throwing tantrums)
Would like to hear you pro-s input on this
Using
Visual Studio 2013 Community edition (recently switched from Pro to Express to Community)
Windows 7 (64-bit)
Git tools
Git windows installation
Nuget Package manager
Visual Studio Log File
http://filesave.me/file/50620/log-txt.html
Mehradzie

Hi Mehradzie,
Based on the description, seems you're working with Git team project in Visual Studio Online(formerly Team Foundation Service). I'd like to know whether you mean Visual Studio Git command tool as the plug-in, and if you're trying to create solutions/projects
with Visual Studio and add them to the created Git team project.
From the screenshot, you're not connect to the Git team project by using Team Explorer. To work with Git team project locally, you can follow the instructions as below:
Connect to Git team project by using Team Explorer, after that you might install Git tools if you connect to the team project for the first time
Clone the remote Git repository to a local git repository and set the path to local git repository
Create a solution and select Git source control, also saved to the local path of the local git repository
Select your branch, and then click "Changes" and Commit the changes
Click "unsynced commits" and push the commit to remote git repository
You can also refer to the links below for more information about getting started with Git in Visual Studio Online.
http://www.visualstudio.com/en-us/get-started/share-your-code-in-git-vs.aspx
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/visualstudioalm/archive/2013/01/30/getting-started-with-git-in-visual-studio-and-team-foundation-service.aspx
If you still have any other concerns, please elaborate more details about your scenario. Thanks for your understanding.
Best regards,
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

Custom SharePoint 2010 designer page throws "The data source control failed to execute the insert command" exception while adding the new item after the August 13, 2013 CU has installed

We have the SharePoint Server 2010 with SP1 environment on which the custom SP2010 designer pages were working as expected before the
August 13, 2013 CU has installed. But, getting the below exception while trying to add the new item after the CU has installed.
Error while executing web part: System.NullReferenceException: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.     at Microsoft.SharePoint.WebControls.SPDataSourceView.ExecuteInsert(IDictionary values)     at
System.Web.UI.DataSourceView.Insert(IDictionary values, DataSourceViewOperationCallback callback) 3b64c3a0-48f3-4d4a-af54-d0a2fc4553cc
06/19/2014 16:49:37.65 w3wp.exe (0x1240)                       0x1300 SharePoint Foundation
Runtime                       tkau Unexpected Microsoft.SharePoint.WebPartPages.DataFormWebPartException: The data source control
failed to execute the insert command. 3b64c3a0-48f3-4d4a-af54-d0a2fc4553cc    at Microsoft.SharePoint.WebPartPages.DataFormWebPart.InsertCallback(Int32 affectedRecords, Exception ex)     at System.Web.UI.DataSourceView.Insert(IDictionary
values, DataSourceViewOperationCallback callback)     at Microsoft.SharePoint.WebPartPages.DataFormWebPart.FlatCommit()     at Microsoft.SharePoint.WebPartPages.DataFormWebPart.HandleOnSave(Object sender, EventArgs e)
at Microsoft.SharePoint.WebPartPages.DataFormWebPart.RaisePostBackEvent(String eventArgument)     at System.Web.UI.Page.RaisePostBackEvent(IPostBackEventHandler sourceControl, String eventArgument)     at System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean
inclu... 3b64c3a0-48f3-4d4a-af54-d0a2fc4553cc
06/19/2014 16:49:37.65* w3wp.exe (0x1240)                       0x1300 SharePoint Foundation
Runtime                       tkau Unexpected ...deStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint) 3b64c3a0-48f3-4d4a-af54-d0a2fc4553cc
I have tried changing the "DataSourceMode" as below, now the insert command is working, but update command is not working.
<SharePoint:SPDataSource runat="server" DataSourceMode="ListItem" />
Also, the lookup dropdown fields are displaying the value as "<a href="Daughterhttp://cpsp10/sites/Employees/_layouts/listform.aspx?PageType=4&ListId={8F62F444-FB6A-4F03-9522-C4696B45DCD1}&ID=10&RootFolder=*">Daughter</a>"
instead of only "Daughter".
Please provide the solution to get rid of this issue.
Thanks
Ramasubbu

Try below:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/ae910269-3a0c-4506-844b-e8bc89d95b71/data-source-control-failed-to-execute-the-insert-command
http://blog.jussipalo.com/2012/01/sharepoint-2010-data-source-control.html
While there can be many causes for this generic error message, in my case the first parameter or ddwrt:DataBind function inside the SharePoint:FormFields element was
'i' and I was working with an Edit Form. Changing it to
'u' as it was with every other FormField fixed the issue.
<SharePoint:FormField runat="server" id="ff1{$Pos}" ControlMode="Edit" FieldName="Esittaja" __designer:bind="{ddwrt:DataBind('u',concat('ff1',$Pos),'Value','ValueChanged','ID',ddwrt:EscapeDelims(string(@ID)),'@Esittaja')}"
/>
Explanation:
DataBind operation type parameters (the first parameter) are listed below:
'i' stands for INSERT,
'u' stands for UPDATE,
'd' stands for DELETE.
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:d9HHY4I7omgJ:thearkfloats.blogspot.com/2014/03/sharepoint-2010-data-source-control.html+&cd=4&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=in
If this helped you resolve your issue, please mark it Answered

Can i use subfolders with source control for developer ?

We'd like to use the repository as source control for our developer files.
We planned to use the following structure in the repository:
- Application Container
- Folder
- Files
We uploaded the files in the repository.
Now if we open the file through the ron the file will open in form builder, which is pretty good.
The following thing I'de like to do is a checkout of the file ... ok ...i'm going to file - administration - checkout - the message occurs: no versionable object exists ! ... ? :-(.
So I go to file - administration - source control options .. i'd like to say forms that it has to look for the file in a subfolder of the application system .. ok.
After changing this i try again - the same message.
If I return to source control options the container entry has been changed to the application folder.
Are Subfolders not supported by the source control for developer ?
Does anybody have the same effects ?
Background informations ?
Thanks in advance
Mario
null

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by [email protected]:
Did you check the file in first? When you first put files in Repository, they are initially unversioned until the first checkin...
Brian<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Hello Brian
Sorry, for the delay. I worked for some day for another customer.
Yes, i did.
I'm working like this:
- upload file with check in Folder which is under an application Folder (app - fmb )
- then i check out the fmb in the repository
- doubleclick in repository, which opens the form in form builder
- change the file
- File - Administration - check-in - connect to repository - choosing the workarea - and defining the folder (app - fmb ).
- The file will be check-in, but directly under the folder app.
Thanks in advance
Mario
null

Robo HTML 9 will not open our project from Source Control after initial start.

We have a project in version control that we have been using forever, since 2003 or so and many versions of RH. Now that we have upgraded to 9, this project will open the first time in version control and work normally. Once you close the project and attempt to reopen from the starter screen, it opens just great, just not in version control. The files are still set to read only. I have done this several times and the only way i can work on my project in version control is to act like i am opening a project from scratch, then it needs to overwrite all of my local files with the server files. It would not be so bad but I am 3000 miles away from the server and 13 hops plus a slow firewall on the other end. While this has never been a problem in the past it is a big problem because it takes hours for all the files to download and overwrite my local files.
This only happens with RH9 and Version Control 3.1. RH8 works no problem. So, I don't know if this is a RH9 starter problem or a Source Control Problem. Maybe I will make a similar thread in the RH area. I'll wait to see if I get any useful hits from this one first.
It is very strange, I had RH9 open for several days because I was afraid to close the project for this reason and yesterday I published for the month so the heat is less right now but today, it opened with no source control. If I go to Source Control the only thing i can select is put project in source control. That is how it got into source control after converting to RH9.
We have another project that seems to open from version control normally but we can only save topics in HTML view. No useful answers to that topic after a week.
Got any ideas???
I have tried different folder names, different paths, etc.
Thanks,
dv

Ok, here is a wierd one, I used the add to version control icon in the menu bar, It already knew the path so I figured I'm the only one who has been editing these files for the past few days so I clicked add to version control. It added it. I closed and reopeded and still had the same files checked out. Closed, checked in all, then reopened and it is working in SourceControl. Strange that after opening from source control and closing that you need to reopen and tell it to put the project into source control. Obviously some flag is not getting set somewhere. This might help others having problems reopening source control files.
dv

Multi-authoring with source control with RH10 and RH11

Situation:
Writer A is running RH10. Writer A opens Project A, from Visual Studio Source Control, which is connected to a Team Foundation Server.
A new employee, Writer B, has been given RH11.
Writer A can't install RH11 until after mid-June because of tight schedules (can't afford any upgrade problems).
Writer B is supposed to work on the same Help project. (We know that RoboHelp does not support checking out the same file at the same time.)
If Writer B configures her version of RH11 to work with TFS and Source Control, can she open Project A and work on it (from Source Control) without causing problems for Writer A?
Thanks.
Carol Levine

If Writer B is not using Source Control or it is competely separate from Writer A, possibly but I still would not be comfortable.
I think I would rather upgrade Writer A and I note your reservations. It's your call but it's like being between the devil and the deep blue sea. Neither is ideal.
So far it looks like Rh11 upgrades have been OK.
See www.grainge.org for RoboHelp and Authoring tips
@petergrainge

How can I add a Website Project in a solution that should be excluded from source control?

Using VS 2013 update 4
I currently have a solution with a couple of Class Library Projects and Web Application Projects and all of these are bound to a source control (VS Online). Now I added an Existing Website Project in the same solution by choosing a Local IIS instance. However,
I don't want this Website Project to be in source control.
I have tried File > Source Control > Advanced > Change Source Control ... and then clicked on the website project and then clicked Unbind. By doing this, it seems that the project was unbound. However, as soon as I close the solution it asks me
to save the .sln file and seems that it restored the Scc*** info in the file.
I also tried editing the .sln file and set the SccProjectEnlistmentChoice* = 0 (of the website project, under GlobalSection) and then set the ProjectSection of the WebsiteProject to
SccProjectName = ""
SccAuxPath = ""
SccLocalPath = ""
SccProvider = ""
instead of "SAK". This actually worked for me but everytime I open the solution, Visual Studio alerts an error saying "Unspecified error". This is the closest I got into solving this.
Is there a proper way of doing this? I think the proper way should be the "Unbind" method but it seems that it's not working as expected.
Let me know of other solutions.
Cheers!

Hi Karlo Medallo,
Since this issue is related to the VS Online, I am moving your thread into the
Visual Studio Online
Forum for dedicated support. Thanks for your understanding.
Best Regards,
Jack
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

How do I use Perforce Source Control on a substituted drive

Hello all,
I am wrestling my way through using perforce as an integrated source control package in Labview.
The path has many potholes but seems possible.
My latest challenge:
Substituted Paths.
In a professional source control environment there are many users with many views/workspaces and it is good proactice for each one to have a unique name [user][machine][branchname][myprojectstructure]
Labview is notorious for requiring fixed, absolute paths due to the way .vi's remember their callers, my previous practice using IBM/Rational clearcase was to substitue ("subst B: ." ) the project root [myprojectstructure] to another drive, say B: for example. This makes Labview is happy as the paths are now fixed, the developer is happy as they don't have to check out a miriad of files.
This practice is widespread in the embedded software development world and isn't exactly innovative.
Perforce
Clearcase integrated into Labview works seamlessly, you just point the path to the substituted drive and all is well.
Perforce, not so much.
The setup options within labview whilst being intuitive and easy to use, don't appear allow this method.
Does anyone know how to do the equivalent in Perforce?
Thanks in advance,
Tim L.
iTm - Senior Systems Engineer
uses: LABVIEW 2012 SP1 x86 on Windows 7 x64. cFP, cRIO, PXI-RT

Thanks John,
I will see if this works
I hadn't thought about substituting the drive first and then populating the workspace.
I can see that this implimentation requires discipline,
There is a significant danger of refreshing the wrong workspace and trashing modified files.
Tim L.
iTm - Senior Systems Engineer
uses: LABVIEW 2012 SP1 x86 on Windows 7 x64. cFP, cRIO, PXI-RT

Can teamcenter community be used for source control?

I have this new tool called teamcenter community and I'm trying to see how well it will work with source control for labview. I haven't learned how to use it fully yet, but when I try to open a vi get the error message:
The document could not be opened for editing. A windows SharePoint Services compatible application could not be found to edit the document.
I'm using 8.5. Is this a feature that was added to a more recent environment.
Is this feature a possiblity? So far I've been able to use it to manage file, but haven't had success with folders.

Steve:
Unfortunately, teamcenter isn't supported in LabVIEW (past or present). A full list of supported clients is located in this KB. While it may be possible to use other clients, there hasn't been any testing done with them, so they may very well not work with LabVIEW.
Caleb Harris
National Instruments | Mechanical Engineer | http://www.ni.com/support

How to use a 3rd party source control tool with RoboHelp?

Hello,
I would like to set our RoboHelp users up with source control. They are using RoboHelp HTML 8.0.
Our software developers are using the AccuRev scm system; I'd like the doc team to use AccuRev, too.
Can someone direct me to RoboHelp documentation that explains how to set up and use a 3rd party scm system with RoboHelp?
Thank you,
Marilyn

It appears that RoboHelp 7 only sees the first SCC provider listed in the Windows Registry and ignores the rest. I was able to get RoboHelp to display the File | Version Control menu for SourceGear Vault by setting the following two Registry keys and removing keys for other SCC providers (SourceSafe, Surround SCM, and others I am evaluating).
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\SourceCodeControlProvider
     ProviderRegKey = \Software\SourceGear\Vault Client
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\SourceCodeControlProvider\InstalledSCCProviders
     SourceGear Vault VS2003 Compatible Client = SOFTWARE\SourceGear\Vault Client
If I create a new RoboHelp project, save it, then select File | Version Control | Add to Version Control, RoboHelp does the following:
     - pops up the Select Version Control Provider dialog and displays SourceGear Vault Classic Client.
     - I select that, check "Make this my default selection" checkbox, and click OK.
     - RoboHelp crashes.
I'm using SourceGear Vault 5.02 under Windows 7 Ultimate 32-bit. A search of the SourceGear Vault knowledge base reveals that they do not support RoboHelp because of its incorrect behavior and instability. It's so sad that RoboHelp can't work properly with industry standard SCC providers. Vault is by far the best SourceSafe replacement out there, and very affordable.

Steps to export B2B Project and Source Control.

Hi,
I need steps to export a B2B project for source controlling it and deploying the code to higher environments.
Right now the coding is done in DEV , We want to push it to TEST.
Thanks for all the help.
Regards,
Sid.

Documents which we have created newly will also be exported, provided it is part of the agreement.
another answer
First time all "export-import". Every change - incremental export and import

Implementing Source Control

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for