Import Direct Binding Service WSDL in OSB

I was wondering how to import direct binding service wsdl in OEPL. I tried the below but getting an error. Any help is greatly appreciated.
File - Import - File System. .... After importing the WSDL, I'm getting an error. So I was not sure if I'm on the right track or not.
Thanks
NC

If you have brought in the whole directory structure then you can simply drag the WSDL into the corrct directory that relates to your imports.
Then you can delete the unwanted directories using the delete key.
If you don't want the directory structory to import you need to be conscience every time that you need to uncheck a check box that is checked by default. Can't remember the exact name but basiclly something like import directory structure.
Once the WSDL in correct folder and still having issues, open up and view the source. Make sure all references are correct for the project directory structure.
cheers
James

Similar Messages

  • Problem Importing MOSS Search Service WSDL to ALSB 2.6

    I am trying to import the MOSS Search Service WSDL to ALSB 2.6. Facing issues while creating the WSDL resource in ALSB.
    Exception.
    "An error occurred creating the resource : The WSDL is not semantically valid: error: src-resolve: element 'schema@http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema' not found"
    Please let me know the next steps on how to resolve this. I am also not clear whether the ALSB2.6 supports the MOSS SharePoint service WSDL.
    The SharePoint Search service is secured using NTLM authentication. Please also let me know , how to handle the NTLM authentication on ALSB 2.6 for invoking the MOSS Search WebService.
    Any information, forums, links or documentation for the above issue is greatly appreciated.

    A possible workaround:
    1) import into ALSB XMLSchema.xsd e namespace.xsd from w3c
    2) add to msft wsdl <xs:import namespace="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" schemaLocation="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema.xsd"/>
    I tried it with alsb 3.0 and works fine.

  • Error handling for Direct binding

    Hi
    Anybody handled Direct binding exceptions. I have a requirement if the direct binding service is down I have to catch it and do some action. when I have catch or catchAll not catching it. I am getting rollback fault so my bpel waits continuously in running mode. I have a mediator then bpel. mediator times out but bpel is in running mode.
    Thanks
    comp

    try with a non blocking invoke. That will cause a new invoke message to be generated, and a commit of the currently active transaction. So, while the new invoking transaction will be rolled back, a catchable fault will be thrown, and the running tx will commit.
    However, if you are not intending to use a transactional system integration, you could go the soap route as well.
    your call, my 2cents.

  • Difference between Direct binding ,  Web service Adapter and HTTP Binding

    Can any one help what is the differnce between
    *1) Direct binding*
    *2) Webservice Adapter*
    *3) HTTP Binding*
    I am trying to use the above service adapters as references in BPEL.
    I had invoked a web service hosted in OSB from BPEL via web service adapter and was successful
    On going through few docs came through the other two service adapters but was not able to figure out what exactly is the differnce .
    I learnt +"*Direct binding*"+ can be used to call OSB+ . How does it vary from Webservice Adapter+

    hi Eric ,
    Thanks for clarification ..
    OSB does not generate WSDL and web service adapter in BPEL mandates WSDL .
    I had to create WSDL separately and then feed into Web service adapter in BPEL to call OSB Proxy service. Though successful , felt its not an better approach.
    Please advice is there any way thatWSDL is generated in OSB itself . .if i try to create webservice on Proxy service the wsdl resulted from it has only binding and porty type .
    Is it the same case for ++Direct binding++ .I assume it should not be the case

  • Errors in direct binding invocation from BPEL to OSB

    Hi All,
    I have a problem in direct binding invocations between BPEL instances and OSB, this is the detail:
    There is in my composite a BPEL process that includes a catchAll component to manage all the faults resulting in the OSB invoke action and there is a fault policy too configured to manage the retry invocations. If the flow ends successfully there is no problem but if an error happens in the OSB part (time outs, bad address configuration in reference bindings details or something similar) the composite doesn't catch anything and retries aren't executed. The BPEL instance keeps in "running with errors" state from this moment.
    Any help about the management of this situation would be appreciated.
    Thanks,
    The log trace is the next one:
    [component_instance_id: 18440047] Failed to handle dispatch message ... exception ORABPEL-05002[[
    Message handle error.
    error while attempting to process the message "com.collaxa.cube.engine.dispatch.message.invoke.InvokeInstanceMessage"; the reported exception is: JTA transaction is not in active state.
    The transaction became inactive when executing activity "" for instance "18,440,048", bpel engine can not proceed further without an active transaction. please debug the invoked subsystem on why the transaction is not in active status. the transaction status is "MARKED_ROLLBACK".
    The reason was The execution of this instance "18440048" for process "ErrorBPELProcess1" is supposed to be in an active jta transaction, the current transaction status is "MARKED_ROLLBACK", the underlying exception is "oracle.soa.api.invocation.InvocationException: com.bea.wli.sb.transports.client.SBTransportException: An error occured while un-marshalling the request message: com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.CodecException: com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.CodecException: The SOAP envelope is not formatted according to the RPC style. The SOAP Body tag must have one and only one child element (named after the operation name).
    com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.CodecException: com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.CodecException: The SOAP envelope is not formatted according to the RPC style. The SOAP Body tag must have one and only one child element (named after the operation name).
         at com.bea.alsb.soa.codec.SOACodecUtil.unmarshall(SOACodecUtil.java:163)
         at com.bea.wli.sb.transports.sb.codec.SOAMessageHandler.createResponse(SOAMessageHandler.java:116)
         at com.bea.wli.sb.transports.sb.bean.SBDispatcherBean.invoke(SBDispatcherBean.java:355)
         at com.bea.wli.sb.transports.sb.bean.SBDispatcher_nwlqik_EOImpl.__WL_invoke(Unknown Source)
         at weblogic.ejb.container.internal.SessionRemoteMethodInvoker.invoke(SessionRemoteMethodInvoker.java:40)
         at com.bea.wli.sb.transports.sb.bean.SBDispatcher_nwlqik_EOImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
         at com.bea.wli.sb.transports.sb.bean.SBDispatcher_nwlqik_EOImpl_WLSkel.invoke(Unknown Source)
         at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.invoke(BasicServerRef.java:667)
         at weblogic.rmi.cluster.ClusterableServerRef.invoke(ClusterableServerRef.java:230)
         at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef$1.run(BasicServerRef.java:522)
         at weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:363)
         at weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:146)
         at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.handleRequest(BasicServerRef.java:518)
         at weblogic.rmi.internal.wls.WLSExecuteRequest.run(WLSExecuteRequest.java:118)
         at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:256)
         at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:221)
    Caused by: com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.CodecException: The SOAP envelope is not formatted according to the RPC style. The SOAP Body tag must have one and only one child element (named after the operation name).
         at com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.internal.runtime.soap.SoapRpcCodec.unmarshallBody(SoapRpcCodec.java:107)
         at com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.internal.runtime.soap.SoapCodec.unmarshall(SoapCodec.java:262)
         at com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.internal.runtime.soap.SoapRpcServiceCodec.unmarshall(SoapRpcServiceCodec.java:60)
         at com.bea.alsb.soa.codec.SOACodecUtil.unmarshall(SOACodecUtil.java:155)
         ... 15 more
    Consult the system administrator regarding this error.
    This error contained an exception thrown by the message handler.
    Check the exception trace in the log (with logging level set to debug mode).
    ORABPEL-05002
    Message handle error.
    error while attempting to process the message "com.collaxa.cube.engine.dispatch.message.invoke.InvokeInstanceMessage"; the reported exception is: JTA transaction is not in active state.
    The transaction became inactive when executing activity "" for instance "18,440,048", bpel engine can not proceed further without an active transaction. please debug the invoked subsystem on why the transaction is not in active status. the transaction status is "MARKED_ROLLBACK".
    The reason was The execution of this instance "18440048" for process "ErrorBPELProcess1" is supposed to be in an active jta transaction, the current transaction status is "MARKED_ROLLBACK", the underlying exception is "oracle.soa.api.invocation.InvocationException: com.bea.wli.sb.transports.client.SBTransportException: An error occured while un-marshalling the request message: com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.CodecException: com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.CodecException: The SOAP envelope is not formatted according to the RPC style. The SOAP Body tag must have one and only one child element (named after the operation name).
    com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.CodecException: com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.CodecException: The SOAP envelope is not formatted according to the RPC style. The SOAP Body tag must have one and only one child element (named after the operation name).
         at com.bea.alsb.soa.codec.SOACodecUtil.unmarshall(SOACodecUtil.java:163)
         at com.bea.wli.sb.transports.sb.codec.SOAMessageHandler.createResponse(SOAMessageHandler.java:116)
         at com.bea.wli.sb.transports.sb.bean.SBDispatcherBean.invoke(SBDispatcherBean.java:355)
         at com.bea.wli.sb.transports.sb.bean.SBDispatcher_nwlqik_EOImpl.__WL_invoke(Unknown Source)
         at weblogic.ejb.container.internal.SessionRemoteMethodInvoker.invoke(SessionRemoteMethodInvoker.java:40)
         at com.bea.wli.sb.transports.sb.bean.SBDispatcher_nwlqik_EOImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
         at com.bea.wli.sb.transports.sb.bean.SBDispatcher_nwlqik_EOImpl_WLSkel.invoke(Unknown Source)
         at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.invoke(BasicServerRef.java:667)
         at weblogic.rmi.cluster.ClusterableServerRef.invoke(ClusterableServerRef.java:230)
         at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef$1.run(BasicServerRef.java:522)
         at weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:363)
         at weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:146)
         at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.handleRequest(BasicServerRef.java:518)
         at weblogic.rmi.internal.wls.WLSExecuteRequest.run(WLSExecuteRequest.java:118)
         at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:256)
         at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:221)
    Caused by: com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.CodecException: The SOAP envelope is not formatted according to the RPC style. The SOAP Body tag must have one and only one child element (named after the operation name).
         at com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.internal.runtime.soap.SoapRpcCodec.unmarshallBody(SoapRpcCodec.java:107)
         at com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.internal.runtime.soap.SoapCodec.unmarshall(SoapCodec.java:262)
         at com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.internal.runtime.soap.SoapRpcServiceCodec.unmarshall(SoapRpcServiceCodec.java:60)
         at com.bea.alsb.soa.codec.SOACodecUtil.unmarshall(SOACodecUtil.java:155)
         ... 15 more
    Consult the system administrator regarding this error.
    This error contained an exception thrown by the message handler.
    Check the exception trace in the log (with logging level set to debug mode).
         at com.collaxa.cube.engine.dispatch.DispatchHelper.handleMessage(DispatchHelper.java:205)
         at com.collaxa.cube.engine.dispatch.BaseDispatchTask.process(BaseDispatchTask.java:88)
         at com.collaxa.cube.engine.dispatch.BaseDispatchTask.run(BaseDispatchTask.java:64)
         at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886)
         at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
         at com.collaxa.cube.engine.dispatch.Dispatcher$ContextCapturingThreadFactory$2.run(Dispatcher.java:850)
         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
    And this is the payload from the instance details:
    <messages>
    <input>
    ... input data....
    </input>
    <fault>
    <exception class="com.collaxa.cube.engine.EngineException">
    JTA transaction is not in active state. The transaction became inactive when executing activity "" for instance "18,440,048", bpel engine can not proceed further without an active transaction. please debug the invoked subsystem on why the transaction is not in active status. the transaction status is "MARKED_ROLLBACK". The reason was The execution of this instance "18440048" for process "ErrorBPELProcess1" is supposed to be in an active jta transaction, the current transaction status is "MARKED_ROLLBACK", the underlying exception is "oracle.soa.api.invocation.InvocationException: com.bea.wli.sb.transports.client.SBTransportException: An error occured while un-marshalling the request message: com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.CodecException: com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.CodecException: The SOAP envelope is not formatted according to the RPC style. The SOAP Body tag must have one and only one child element (named after the operation name). com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.CodecException: com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.CodecException: The SOAP envelope is not formatted according to the RPC style. The SOAP Body tag must have one and only one child element (named after the operation name). at com.bea.alsb.soa.codec.SOACodecUtil.unmarshall(SOACodecUtil.java:163) at com.bea.wli.sb.transports.sb.codec.SOAMessageHandler.createResponse(SOAMessageHandler.java:116) at com.bea.wli.sb.transports.sb.bean.SBDispatcherBean.invoke(SBDispatcherBean.java:355) at com.bea.wli.sb.transports.sb.bean.SBDispatcher_nwlqik_EOImpl.__WL_invoke(Unknown Source) at weblogic.ejb.container.internal.SessionRemoteMethodInvoker.invoke(SessionRemoteMethodInvoker.java:40) at com.bea.wli.sb.transports.sb.bean.SBDispatcher_nwlqik_EOImpl.invoke(Unknown Source) at com.bea.wli.sb.transports.sb.bean.SBDispatcher_nwlqik_EOImpl_WLSkel.invoke(Unknown Source) at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.invoke(BasicServerRef.java:667) at weblogic.rmi.cluster.ClusterableServerRef.invoke(ClusterableServerRef.java:230) at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef$1.run(BasicServerRef.java:522) at weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:363) at weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:146) at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.handleRequest(BasicServerRef.java:518) at weblogic.rmi.internal.wls.WLSExecuteRequest.run(WLSExecuteRequest.java:118) at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:256) at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:221) Caused by: com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.CodecException: The SOAP envelope is not formatted according to the RPC style. The SOAP Body tag must have one and only one child element (named after the operation name). at com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.internal.runtime.soap.SoapRpcCodec.unmarshallBody(SoapRpcCodec.java:107) at com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.internal.runtime.soap.SoapCodec.unmarshall(SoapCodec.java:262) at com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.internal.runtime.soap.SoapRpcServiceCodec.unmarshall(SoapRpcServiceCodec.java:60) at com.bea.alsb.soa.codec.SOACodecUtil.unmarshall(SOACodecUtil.java:155) ... 15 more " . Consult the system administrator regarding this error.
    <stack>
    <f>com.oracle.bpel.client.util.TransactionUtils.throwExceptionIfTxnNotActive#107</f>
    <f>com.collaxa.cube.ws.WSInvocationManager.invoke#352</f>
    <f>com.collaxa.cube.engine.ext.common.InvokeHandler.__invoke#1070</f>
    <f>com.collaxa.cube.engine.ext.common.InvokeHandler.handleNormalInvoke#584</f>
    <f>com.collaxa.cube.engine.ext.common.InvokeHandler.handle#132</f>
    <f>com.collaxa.cube.engine.ext.bpel.common.wmp.BPELInvokeWMP.__executeStatements#74</f>
    <f>com.collaxa.cube.engine.ext.bpel.common.wmp.BaseBPELActivityWMP.perform#166</f>
    <f>com.collaxa.cube.engine.CubeEngine.performActivity#2687</f>
    <f>com.collaxa.cube.engine.CubeEngine._handleWorkItem#1190</f>
    <f>com.collaxa.cube.engine.CubeEngine.handleWorkItem#1093</f>
    <f>com.collaxa.cube.engine.dispatch.message.instance.PerformMessageHandler.handleLocal#76</f>
    <f>com.collaxa.cube.engine.dispatch.DispatchHelper.handleLocalMessage#218</f>
    <f>com.collaxa.cube.engine.dispatch.DispatchHelper.sendMemory#297</f>
    <f>com.collaxa.cube.engine.CubeEngine.endRequest#4609</f>
    <f>com.collaxa.cube.engine.CubeEngine.endRequest#4540</f>
    <f>com.collaxa.cube.engine.CubeEngine._createAndInvoke#713</f>
    <f>...</f>
    </stack>
    </exception>
    <root class="oracle.fabric.common.FabricInvocationException">
    oracle.soa.api.invocation.InvocationException: com.bea.wli.sb.transports.client.SBTransportException: An error occured while un-marshalling the request message: com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.CodecException: com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.CodecException: The SOAP envelope is not formatted according to the RPC style. The SOAP Body tag must have one and only one child element (named after the operation name). com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.CodecException: com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.CodecException: The SOAP envelope is not formatted according to the RPC style. The SOAP Body tag must have one and only one child element (named after the operation name). at com.bea.alsb.soa.codec.SOACodecUtil.unmarshall(SOACodecUtil.java:163) at com.bea.wli.sb.transports.sb.codec.SOAMessageHandler.createResponse(SOAMessageHandler.java:116) at com.bea.wli.sb.transports.sb.bean.SBDispatcherBean.invoke(SBDispatcherBean.java:355) at com.bea.wli.sb.transports.sb.bean.SBDispatcher_nwlqik_EOImpl.__WL_invoke(Unknown Source) at weblogic.ejb.container.internal.SessionRemoteMethodInvoker.invoke(SessionRemoteMethodInvoker.java:40) at com.bea.wli.sb.transports.sb.bean.SBDispatcher_nwlqik_EOImpl.invoke(Unknown Source) at com.bea.wli.sb.transports.sb.bean.SBDispatcher_nwlqik_EOImpl_WLSkel.invoke(Unknown Source) at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.invoke(BasicServerRef.java:667) at weblogic.rmi.cluster.ClusterableServerRef.invoke(ClusterableServerRef.java:230) at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef$1.run(BasicServerRef.java:522) at weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:363) at weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:146) at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.handleRequest(BasicServerRef.java:518) at weblogic.rmi.internal.wls.WLSExecuteRequest.run(WLSExecuteRequest.java:118) at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:256) at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:221) Caused by: com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.CodecException: The SOAP envelope is not formatted according to the RPC style. The SOAP Body tag must have one and only one child element (named after the operation name). at com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.internal.runtime.soap.SoapRpcCodec.unmarshallBody(SoapRpcCodec.java:107) at com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.internal.runtime.soap.SoapCodec.unmarshall(SoapCodec.java:262) at com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.internal.runtime.soap.SoapRpcServiceCodec.unmarshall(SoapRpcServiceCodec.java:60) at com.bea.alsb.soa.codec.SOACodecUtil.unmarshall(SOACodecUtil.java:155) ... 15 more
    <stack>
    <f>oracle.integration.platform.blocks.direct.OutboundMessageDispatcher.request#124</f>
    <f>oracle.integration.platform.blocks.direct.DirectExternalBindingComponent.request#190</f>
    <f>oracle.integration.platform.blocks.mesh.SynchronousMessageHandler.doRequest#139</f>
    <f>oracle.integration.platform.blocks.mesh.MessageRouter.request#182</f>
    <f>oracle.integration.platform.blocks.mesh.MeshImpl$2.run#178</f>
    <f>java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged</f>
    <f>javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs#396</f>
    <f>oracle.integration.platform.blocks.mesh.MeshImpl.doRequestAsSubject#176</f>
    <f>oracle.integration.platform.blocks.mesh.MeshImpl.request#151</f>
    <f>sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor1294.invoke</f>
    <f>sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke#25</f>
    <f>java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke#597</f>
    <f>org.springframework.aop.support.AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection#307</f>
    <f>org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.invokeJoinpoint#182</f>
    <f>org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed#149</f>
    <f>oracle.integration.platform.metrics.PhaseEventAspect.invoke#71</f>
    <f>...</f>
    </stack>
    </root>
    </fault>
    </messages>
    Edited by: luismi fernandez on Aug 1, 2012 1:20 AM

    Hi All,
    I have a problem in direct binding invocations between BPEL instances and OSB, this is the detail:
    There is in my composite a BPEL process that includes a catchAll component to manage all the faults resulting in the OSB invoke action and there is a fault policy too configured to manage the retry invocations. If the flow ends successfully there is no problem but if an error happens in the OSB part (time outs, bad address configuration in reference bindings details or something similar) the composite doesn't catch anything and retries aren't executed. The BPEL instance keeps in "running with errors" state from this moment.
    Any help about the management of this situation would be appreciated.
    Thanks,
    The log trace is the next one:
    [component_instance_id: 18440047] Failed to handle dispatch message ... exception ORABPEL-05002[[
    Message handle error.
    error while attempting to process the message "com.collaxa.cube.engine.dispatch.message.invoke.InvokeInstanceMessage"; the reported exception is: JTA transaction is not in active state.
    The transaction became inactive when executing activity "" for instance "18,440,048", bpel engine can not proceed further without an active transaction. please debug the invoked subsystem on why the transaction is not in active status. the transaction status is "MARKED_ROLLBACK".
    The reason was The execution of this instance "18440048" for process "ErrorBPELProcess1" is supposed to be in an active jta transaction, the current transaction status is "MARKED_ROLLBACK", the underlying exception is "oracle.soa.api.invocation.InvocationException: com.bea.wli.sb.transports.client.SBTransportException: An error occured while un-marshalling the request message: com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.CodecException: com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.CodecException: The SOAP envelope is not formatted according to the RPC style. The SOAP Body tag must have one and only one child element (named after the operation name).
    com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.CodecException: com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.CodecException: The SOAP envelope is not formatted according to the RPC style. The SOAP Body tag must have one and only one child element (named after the operation name).
         at com.bea.alsb.soa.codec.SOACodecUtil.unmarshall(SOACodecUtil.java:163)
         at com.bea.wli.sb.transports.sb.codec.SOAMessageHandler.createResponse(SOAMessageHandler.java:116)
         at com.bea.wli.sb.transports.sb.bean.SBDispatcherBean.invoke(SBDispatcherBean.java:355)
         at com.bea.wli.sb.transports.sb.bean.SBDispatcher_nwlqik_EOImpl.__WL_invoke(Unknown Source)
         at weblogic.ejb.container.internal.SessionRemoteMethodInvoker.invoke(SessionRemoteMethodInvoker.java:40)
         at com.bea.wli.sb.transports.sb.bean.SBDispatcher_nwlqik_EOImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
         at com.bea.wli.sb.transports.sb.bean.SBDispatcher_nwlqik_EOImpl_WLSkel.invoke(Unknown Source)
         at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.invoke(BasicServerRef.java:667)
         at weblogic.rmi.cluster.ClusterableServerRef.invoke(ClusterableServerRef.java:230)
         at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef$1.run(BasicServerRef.java:522)
         at weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:363)
         at weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:146)
         at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.handleRequest(BasicServerRef.java:518)
         at weblogic.rmi.internal.wls.WLSExecuteRequest.run(WLSExecuteRequest.java:118)
         at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:256)
         at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:221)
    Caused by: com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.CodecException: The SOAP envelope is not formatted according to the RPC style. The SOAP Body tag must have one and only one child element (named after the operation name).
         at com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.internal.runtime.soap.SoapRpcCodec.unmarshallBody(SoapRpcCodec.java:107)
         at com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.internal.runtime.soap.SoapCodec.unmarshall(SoapCodec.java:262)
         at com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.internal.runtime.soap.SoapRpcServiceCodec.unmarshall(SoapRpcServiceCodec.java:60)
         at com.bea.alsb.soa.codec.SOACodecUtil.unmarshall(SOACodecUtil.java:155)
         ... 15 more
    Consult the system administrator regarding this error.
    This error contained an exception thrown by the message handler.
    Check the exception trace in the log (with logging level set to debug mode).
    ORABPEL-05002
    Message handle error.
    error while attempting to process the message "com.collaxa.cube.engine.dispatch.message.invoke.InvokeInstanceMessage"; the reported exception is: JTA transaction is not in active state.
    The transaction became inactive when executing activity "" for instance "18,440,048", bpel engine can not proceed further without an active transaction. please debug the invoked subsystem on why the transaction is not in active status. the transaction status is "MARKED_ROLLBACK".
    The reason was The execution of this instance "18440048" for process "ErrorBPELProcess1" is supposed to be in an active jta transaction, the current transaction status is "MARKED_ROLLBACK", the underlying exception is "oracle.soa.api.invocation.InvocationException: com.bea.wli.sb.transports.client.SBTransportException: An error occured while un-marshalling the request message: com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.CodecException: com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.CodecException: The SOAP envelope is not formatted according to the RPC style. The SOAP Body tag must have one and only one child element (named after the operation name).
    com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.CodecException: com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.CodecException: The SOAP envelope is not formatted according to the RPC style. The SOAP Body tag must have one and only one child element (named after the operation name).
         at com.bea.alsb.soa.codec.SOACodecUtil.unmarshall(SOACodecUtil.java:163)
         at com.bea.wli.sb.transports.sb.codec.SOAMessageHandler.createResponse(SOAMessageHandler.java:116)
         at com.bea.wli.sb.transports.sb.bean.SBDispatcherBean.invoke(SBDispatcherBean.java:355)
         at com.bea.wli.sb.transports.sb.bean.SBDispatcher_nwlqik_EOImpl.__WL_invoke(Unknown Source)
         at weblogic.ejb.container.internal.SessionRemoteMethodInvoker.invoke(SessionRemoteMethodInvoker.java:40)
         at com.bea.wli.sb.transports.sb.bean.SBDispatcher_nwlqik_EOImpl.invoke(Unknown Source)
         at com.bea.wli.sb.transports.sb.bean.SBDispatcher_nwlqik_EOImpl_WLSkel.invoke(Unknown Source)
         at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.invoke(BasicServerRef.java:667)
         at weblogic.rmi.cluster.ClusterableServerRef.invoke(ClusterableServerRef.java:230)
         at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef$1.run(BasicServerRef.java:522)
         at weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:363)
         at weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:146)
         at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.handleRequest(BasicServerRef.java:518)
         at weblogic.rmi.internal.wls.WLSExecuteRequest.run(WLSExecuteRequest.java:118)
         at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:256)
         at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:221)
    Caused by: com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.CodecException: The SOAP envelope is not formatted according to the RPC style. The SOAP Body tag must have one and only one child element (named after the operation name).
         at com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.internal.runtime.soap.SoapRpcCodec.unmarshallBody(SoapRpcCodec.java:107)
         at com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.internal.runtime.soap.SoapCodec.unmarshall(SoapCodec.java:262)
         at com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.internal.runtime.soap.SoapRpcServiceCodec.unmarshall(SoapRpcServiceCodec.java:60)
         at com.bea.alsb.soa.codec.SOACodecUtil.unmarshall(SOACodecUtil.java:155)
         ... 15 more
    Consult the system administrator regarding this error.
    This error contained an exception thrown by the message handler.
    Check the exception trace in the log (with logging level set to debug mode).
         at com.collaxa.cube.engine.dispatch.DispatchHelper.handleMessage(DispatchHelper.java:205)
         at com.collaxa.cube.engine.dispatch.BaseDispatchTask.process(BaseDispatchTask.java:88)
         at com.collaxa.cube.engine.dispatch.BaseDispatchTask.run(BaseDispatchTask.java:64)
         at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886)
         at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
         at com.collaxa.cube.engine.dispatch.Dispatcher$ContextCapturingThreadFactory$2.run(Dispatcher.java:850)
         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662)
    And this is the payload from the instance details:
    <messages>
    <input>
    ... input data....
    </input>
    <fault>
    <exception class="com.collaxa.cube.engine.EngineException">
    JTA transaction is not in active state. The transaction became inactive when executing activity "" for instance "18,440,048", bpel engine can not proceed further without an active transaction. please debug the invoked subsystem on why the transaction is not in active status. the transaction status is "MARKED_ROLLBACK". The reason was The execution of this instance "18440048" for process "ErrorBPELProcess1" is supposed to be in an active jta transaction, the current transaction status is "MARKED_ROLLBACK", the underlying exception is "oracle.soa.api.invocation.InvocationException: com.bea.wli.sb.transports.client.SBTransportException: An error occured while un-marshalling the request message: com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.CodecException: com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.CodecException: The SOAP envelope is not formatted according to the RPC style. The SOAP Body tag must have one and only one child element (named after the operation name). com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.CodecException: com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.CodecException: The SOAP envelope is not formatted according to the RPC style. The SOAP Body tag must have one and only one child element (named after the operation name). at com.bea.alsb.soa.codec.SOACodecUtil.unmarshall(SOACodecUtil.java:163) at com.bea.wli.sb.transports.sb.codec.SOAMessageHandler.createResponse(SOAMessageHandler.java:116) at com.bea.wli.sb.transports.sb.bean.SBDispatcherBean.invoke(SBDispatcherBean.java:355) at com.bea.wli.sb.transports.sb.bean.SBDispatcher_nwlqik_EOImpl.__WL_invoke(Unknown Source) at weblogic.ejb.container.internal.SessionRemoteMethodInvoker.invoke(SessionRemoteMethodInvoker.java:40) at com.bea.wli.sb.transports.sb.bean.SBDispatcher_nwlqik_EOImpl.invoke(Unknown Source) at com.bea.wli.sb.transports.sb.bean.SBDispatcher_nwlqik_EOImpl_WLSkel.invoke(Unknown Source) at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.invoke(BasicServerRef.java:667) at weblogic.rmi.cluster.ClusterableServerRef.invoke(ClusterableServerRef.java:230) at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef$1.run(BasicServerRef.java:522) at weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:363) at weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:146) at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.handleRequest(BasicServerRef.java:518) at weblogic.rmi.internal.wls.WLSExecuteRequest.run(WLSExecuteRequest.java:118) at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:256) at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:221) Caused by: com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.CodecException: The SOAP envelope is not formatted according to the RPC style. The SOAP Body tag must have one and only one child element (named after the operation name). at com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.internal.runtime.soap.SoapRpcCodec.unmarshallBody(SoapRpcCodec.java:107) at com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.internal.runtime.soap.SoapCodec.unmarshall(SoapCodec.java:262) at com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.internal.runtime.soap.SoapRpcServiceCodec.unmarshall(SoapRpcServiceCodec.java:60) at com.bea.alsb.soa.codec.SOACodecUtil.unmarshall(SOACodecUtil.java:155) ... 15 more " . Consult the system administrator regarding this error.
    <stack>
    <f>com.oracle.bpel.client.util.TransactionUtils.throwExceptionIfTxnNotActive#107</f>
    <f>com.collaxa.cube.ws.WSInvocationManager.invoke#352</f>
    <f>com.collaxa.cube.engine.ext.common.InvokeHandler.__invoke#1070</f>
    <f>com.collaxa.cube.engine.ext.common.InvokeHandler.handleNormalInvoke#584</f>
    <f>com.collaxa.cube.engine.ext.common.InvokeHandler.handle#132</f>
    <f>com.collaxa.cube.engine.ext.bpel.common.wmp.BPELInvokeWMP.__executeStatements#74</f>
    <f>com.collaxa.cube.engine.ext.bpel.common.wmp.BaseBPELActivityWMP.perform#166</f>
    <f>com.collaxa.cube.engine.CubeEngine.performActivity#2687</f>
    <f>com.collaxa.cube.engine.CubeEngine._handleWorkItem#1190</f>
    <f>com.collaxa.cube.engine.CubeEngine.handleWorkItem#1093</f>
    <f>com.collaxa.cube.engine.dispatch.message.instance.PerformMessageHandler.handleLocal#76</f>
    <f>com.collaxa.cube.engine.dispatch.DispatchHelper.handleLocalMessage#218</f>
    <f>com.collaxa.cube.engine.dispatch.DispatchHelper.sendMemory#297</f>
    <f>com.collaxa.cube.engine.CubeEngine.endRequest#4609</f>
    <f>com.collaxa.cube.engine.CubeEngine.endRequest#4540</f>
    <f>com.collaxa.cube.engine.CubeEngine._createAndInvoke#713</f>
    <f>...</f>
    </stack>
    </exception>
    <root class="oracle.fabric.common.FabricInvocationException">
    oracle.soa.api.invocation.InvocationException: com.bea.wli.sb.transports.client.SBTransportException: An error occured while un-marshalling the request message: com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.CodecException: com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.CodecException: The SOAP envelope is not formatted according to the RPC style. The SOAP Body tag must have one and only one child element (named after the operation name). com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.CodecException: com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.CodecException: The SOAP envelope is not formatted according to the RPC style. The SOAP Body tag must have one and only one child element (named after the operation name). at com.bea.alsb.soa.codec.SOACodecUtil.unmarshall(SOACodecUtil.java:163) at com.bea.wli.sb.transports.sb.codec.SOAMessageHandler.createResponse(SOAMessageHandler.java:116) at com.bea.wli.sb.transports.sb.bean.SBDispatcherBean.invoke(SBDispatcherBean.java:355) at com.bea.wli.sb.transports.sb.bean.SBDispatcher_nwlqik_EOImpl.__WL_invoke(Unknown Source) at weblogic.ejb.container.internal.SessionRemoteMethodInvoker.invoke(SessionRemoteMethodInvoker.java:40) at com.bea.wli.sb.transports.sb.bean.SBDispatcher_nwlqik_EOImpl.invoke(Unknown Source) at com.bea.wli.sb.transports.sb.bean.SBDispatcher_nwlqik_EOImpl_WLSkel.invoke(Unknown Source) at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.invoke(BasicServerRef.java:667) at weblogic.rmi.cluster.ClusterableServerRef.invoke(ClusterableServerRef.java:230) at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef$1.run(BasicServerRef.java:522) at weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:363) at weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:146) at weblogic.rmi.internal.BasicServerRef.handleRequest(BasicServerRef.java:518) at weblogic.rmi.internal.wls.WLSExecuteRequest.run(WLSExecuteRequest.java:118) at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:256) at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:221) Caused by: com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.CodecException: The SOAP envelope is not formatted according to the RPC style. The SOAP Body tag must have one and only one child element (named after the operation name). at com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.internal.runtime.soap.SoapRpcCodec.unmarshallBody(SoapRpcCodec.java:107) at com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.internal.runtime.soap.SoapCodec.unmarshall(SoapCodec.java:262) at com.bea.alsb.ws.codec.internal.runtime.soap.SoapRpcServiceCodec.unmarshall(SoapRpcServiceCodec.java:60) at com.bea.alsb.soa.codec.SOACodecUtil.unmarshall(SOACodecUtil.java:155) ... 15 more
    <stack>
    <f>oracle.integration.platform.blocks.direct.OutboundMessageDispatcher.request#124</f>
    <f>oracle.integration.platform.blocks.direct.DirectExternalBindingComponent.request#190</f>
    <f>oracle.integration.platform.blocks.mesh.SynchronousMessageHandler.doRequest#139</f>
    <f>oracle.integration.platform.blocks.mesh.MessageRouter.request#182</f>
    <f>oracle.integration.platform.blocks.mesh.MeshImpl$2.run#178</f>
    <f>java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged</f>
    <f>javax.security.auth.Subject.doAs#396</f>
    <f>oracle.integration.platform.blocks.mesh.MeshImpl.doRequestAsSubject#176</f>
    <f>oracle.integration.platform.blocks.mesh.MeshImpl.request#151</f>
    <f>sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor1294.invoke</f>
    <f>sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke#25</f>
    <f>java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke#597</f>
    <f>org.springframework.aop.support.AopUtils.invokeJoinpointUsingReflection#307</f>
    <f>org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.invokeJoinpoint#182</f>
    <f>org.springframework.aop.framework.ReflectiveMethodInvocation.proceed#149</f>
    <f>oracle.integration.platform.metrics.PhaseEventAspect.invoke#71</f>
    <f>...</f>
    </stack>
    </root>
    </fault>
    </messages>
    Edited by: luismi fernandez on Aug 1, 2012 1:20 AM

  • Field values directly binded to backend service are getting cleared.

    Hi,
    In HCM Forms & Process, for ex: in a form the header field values are directly binded to SAP_PA backend service and rest of the fields (dropdown list and free text fields) are getting from custom generic service. Now there is also a pushbutton in my form is used to calculate percentage of a field. Now when the form is displayed by default the header values are getting populated from SAP_PA backend service. When I click the push button with out selecting values(drop down list) getting from generic service all header field values are getting cleared. But if I select any dropdownlist value before selecting pushbutton and then if I click pushbutton all the header fields are retained with values. I am facing this problem for all the forms that I developed. I am looking for valuable answer.
    Regards,
    Nayani .

    So you are or are not using a user event? Sounded like you were which was firing when the user selecpiushed the "button" for calculating fields. Whatever "event" you have tied that button too seems to be your culprit. Are you doing this calculation in Javascript off the button "onClick" even or passing it to a HCM P&F "user event" in the backend? If it is to a HCM P&F "user event", that's where I would make sure your fields are selected.
    From the sounds of it, it seems when you do NOT select a dropdown list value, your generic service is not handling this gracefully and an error occurs. That would cause ALL other services NOT to run. It's an odd thing the framework does and often very frustrating to hunt down, but whenever any service errors, it will not run others.....hence no fields coming back correctly....even if those other services have NOTHING to do with yours (weird, I know).
    Hope this helps.

  • Sample projects on direct binding in osb 10.3.1

    Hi All,
    Can anyone suggest me some sample projects in osb 10.3.1 describing direct binding
    Thanks in Advance!!

    Hi Roshni,
    You can find examples for OSB 10.3.1 here, not sure if there's one for direct binding, but may be useful anyway...
    http://java.net/projects/oracleservicebus1031/downloads?page=1&theme=java.net
    Cheers,
    Vlad

  • Howto access clustered direct binding Endpoint from OSB - SOA?

    Hello,
    I have one question in a clustered osb / soa envoirement. I a single instance to access a soa endpoint from the osb I use
    t3://serverip:8001/default/myProject/showUserDirectBinding
    what do I have to to if I have a a Cluster?
    I know i the WLS Console I have to add the Cluster Adress serverip1:8001 serverip2:8001
    But what to configure in the OSB Direct Binding?
    t3://serverip1:8001/default/myProject/showUserDirectBinding, t3://serverip2:8001/default/myProject/showUserDirectBinding ?
    Thanks you for you help
    Kind Regards
    Ben

    Hello Anuj,
    thank you for the quick response. I was just updating my post. My expectation is, that there has to be a cluster adress defined. Because when using lot of nodes, like 100+ or attaching new nodes to the cluster, i would be a bad way to always be forced to update the projects and deploy again.
    For setting the cluster adress i have found the documentation :
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E14571_01/core.1111/e12036/extend_soa.htm#insertedID18
    It is some how missleading. I can enter multiple cluster adresses here, why should I do this? How is this adress propagated to the nodes? And is this port custom? Or is this just a List of the Cluster Nodes, but where would be my cluster adress then?
    A Simpler Question, if I enter to my osb cluster the clusteraddress osbfoobar:1234 would the cluster(osb1:8001, osb2:8001) be accessable through osbfoobar:1234?
    Kind Regards
    Ben

  • Timeout for OSB direct binding

    Hi,
    I have a OSB proxy invoking Bpel process using direct binding. whenever there is a unexpected error in Bpel the Proxy is not erroring out immediately and is waiting for 2 min before erroring.
    When we use SOAP binding we can use read timeout to specify the timeout for response.
    How can I do similar stuff using Direct Binding ?
    Any suggestions.
    Thanks
    Sam

    Having the same issue. Did you manage to solve this ?

  • Expose an orchestration as WCF service with a Request-Response port set to Direct Binding

    Hello , 
      I'm trying to expose an orchestration as a WCF service (while the Request-Response port is set to Direct binding) . Is this possible ? (the issue will be correlating back the response to the synchronous WCF request after the response is posted back
    to the Message Box by the Direct Send logical port).
    I have no problem in exposing the orchestration while I'm setting the Binding port to 'Specify Later' (What I'm trying to do actually is to expose a orchestration using different adapters (like Http and Wcf ) in the same time ).
    Thanks

    Yes, you can publish an orchestration as WCF/Web service which has direct bound request-response port.
    Subscription works based on “EpmRRCorrelationToken”
    and “RouteDirectToTP”. When you enlist the orchestration which
    has the direct bound request-response port (also published as service), its subscription are based on above two context properties and they take care of correction.
    And also the response matches to the request part of the port due to the nature of two-way communication protocol.
    Create an Orchestration with direct-bound request-response port and publish it as service. This will work. Give it a try
    Regards,
    M.R.Ashwin Prabhu
    If this answers your question please mark it accordingly. If this post is helpful, please vote as helpful by clicking the upward arrow mark next to my reply.

  • Error after import external webservice(RFC) wsdl url to Process Composer

    Hi all,
    I try to use RFC webservice in my BPM as below:
    1. Expose RFC as webservice using CAF (import external service RFC and then create application service use this external service)
    2. Define Destination in NWA.
    3. Create a Process Composer project, and import the external webservice(RFC) wsdl file as service interface in the project.
    After importing, i get error : the port type specified for the ...binding is undefined. Check port type name and ensure it is defined.
    If i import another external service, not RFC (such as business object), there is no error.
    My system is NWCE 7.11
    Thanks in advance,
    Sinh.
    Edited by: Sinh Nguyen Van on Jul 20, 2009 8:29 AM

    Hi Bharath,
    Below is content of wsdl url and error message, thanks
    Error message:
    The 'zfm_rfc_caf_as' port type specified for the 'zfm_rfc_caf_asBinding' binding is undefined. Check the 'zfm_rfc_caf_as' port type name and ensure it is defined.
    wsdl url :
    - <definitions xmlns="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/" targetNamespace="http://www.sap.com/caf/demo.sap.com/s00_caf_rfc/modeled/zfm_rfc_caf_as" xmlns:b0="http://www.sap.com/caf/demo.sap.com/s00_caf_rfc/modeled/zfm_rfc_caf_as">
      <import namespace="http://www.sap.com/caf/demo.sap.com/s00_caf_rfc/modeled/zfm_rfc_caf_as" location="http://sinhnv-lap:50000/zfm_rfc_caf_as/zfm_rfc_caf_asBeanImpl?wsdl=binding&mode=ws_policy" />
    - <service name="zfm_rfc_caf_as">
    - <port name="zfm_rfc_caf_asBindingPort" binding="b0:zfm_rfc_caf_asBinding">
      <address xmlns="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/soap/" location="http://sinhnv-lap:50000/zfm_rfc_caf_as/zfm_rfc_caf_asBeanImpl" />
      </port>
      </service>
      </definitions>
    Edited by: Sinh Nguyen Van on Jul 22, 2009 4:18 AM

  • SOAP fault propagation for Direct Binding

    Hello.We have following set-up
    Composite A --- OSB -- Composite B
    Composite A exposes HTTP interface (one-way operation) and refers to one-way operation of OSB (over direct binding) which again calls one-way operation of Composite B (again over soa-direct)
    Error in composite B is propagated properly to the OSB. I've tested same also with HTTP proxy on OSB, HTTP 500 returned in case of error in Composite B
    But Composiet A never raises error to the HTTP service. Thus Consumer is getting HTTP 200, regardless downstream error

    try with a non blocking invoke. That will cause a new invoke message to be generated, and a commit of the currently active transaction. So, while the new invoking transaction will be rolled back, a catchable fault will be thrown, and the running tx will commit.
    However, if you are not intending to use a transactional system integration, you could go the soap route as well.
    your call, my 2cents.

  • What are the limitations or disadvantages of SOA Direct Binding

    What are the limitations or disadvantages of SOA Direct Binding.

    When we call SOA service from another SOA service most of the time Local RMI call is used even you are using SOAP over http to invoke the service, this based on your SOA configuration - Refer the following url for more details on Local optimization.
    Albin's Blog: Configuring Local Optimization in Oracle SOA 11g
    SOAP binding will help us to invoke the service exposed with WSDL and accepts XML as request/response.
    HTTP Binding will help us to invoke any services that will accept HTTP GET/POST messages but there is restriction with input/output message type(refer this document for more details Getting Started with Binding Components - 11g Release 1 (11.1.1.7)).
    HTTP binding is light weight and provides better performance.
    I hope this will help you.
    Refer https://forum.java.sun.com/thread/2612466

  • SOA / SOAP - Direct Binding

    Hello,
    I have already searched and googled for plenty for online resources about the question, although they haven't really made my concepts clear.
    I am following this document - Using the Direct Binding Invocation API
    Section : 36.1 Introduction to Direct Binding
    for clarifications about Direct-Binding.
    Objective : Interaction between OSB and SOA Suite Components(BPEL, Mediator).
    Question 1: Why would I use a "direct-binding", instead of a "web/soap binding" ? What are the (dis)advantages ?
    I am quoting snippets from the aforementioned document, around which I have some doubts.
    [Document] A common way to invoke a composite is to use SOAP over HTTP.
    [Question.1]  What are other ways of invoking a composite ? I am aware of SOAP over JMS, however, never used it.
    [Document]  This is enabled by creating a SOAP service for your composite using web service binding. Direct binding enables Java clients to directly invoke composite services, bypassing the intermediate conversion to XML required with web service binding.
    [Question.2]  What I interpret this is : Composite + WebService Binding = SOAP Service of my Composite. I added a "Direct Binding" to the composite and deployed the service. The deployed concrete "directWsdl"  contained 2 auto-generated bindings for SOAP1.1 and SOAP1.2. The Endpoint URL contained "t3" URL. Now the question is, if the aim of direct binding was to avoid to conversion into XML, as with WebService binding, then, why is the deployed directWsdl contains SOAP 1.1 and SOAP1.2 bindings ?
    Any pointers to some theoretical books / resources will help !
    Thanks !

    Direct binding avoids intermediate conversion to XML because an XML Object on client side does not need to be serialized as XML, sent over HTTP(or other transports), deserialized at server and converted to XMLObject again. Client will directly invoke the server side method using RMI and passing the XML object as the input (may be via the direct binding API) this should probably save some processing. But keep in mind that it is not the only reason to use Direct Binding. See the documentation on Direct Binding to identify other benefits or use cases where direct binding may be a good idea.
    Oracle SOA Suite Transport (SOA-DIRECT)

  • Direct Binding Activity

    Hi,
    I have created a BPEL process and exposed it as a proxy service. Now i need to call that proxy service WSDL in to another BPEL process. What is the activity i need to use to call that proxy service WSDL. My friend said that I need to use Direct Binding. If that is right means, How should i use that activity?
    Jdeveloper Version: 11g
    Regards,
    R.Bhaskar Prasanth

    Hi,
    I did the same as in the blog abut iam getting this error.
    PMMessageError during invoking Async operation "process" on target service "DReference1"
    oracle.fabric.common.FabricInvocationException: java.sql.SQLException: Unexpected exception while enlisting XAConnection java.sql.SQLException: Transaction rolled back: setRollbackOnly called on transaction at weblogic.jdbc.jta.DataSource.enlist(DataSource.java:1609) at weblogic.jdbc.jta.DataSource.refreshXAConnAndEnlist(DataSource.java:1496) at weblogic.jdbc.jta.DataSource.getConnection(DataSource.java:439) at weblogic.jdbc.jta.DataSource.connect(DataSource.java:396) at weblogic.jdbc.common.internal.RmiDataSource.getConnection(RmiDataSource.java:355) at oracle.integration.platform.xml.XMLDocumentManagerImpl.getConnection(XMLDocumentManagerImpl.java:623) at oracle.integration.platform.xml.XMLDocumentManagerImpl.insertDocument(XMLDocumentManagerImpl.java:208) at sun.reflect.GeneratedMethodAccessor1643.invoke(Unknown Source) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at
    <payload>

Maybe you are looking for

  • HDMI on Mini to DisplayPort display

    Here's a quick and dumb question: I have a HP monitor currently connected to my late 2012 Mac Mini via a DisplayPort cable. It's the full size connector on the monitor, and I used a mini DisplayPort adapter so that I could plug it into the Thunderbol

  • Little perk: (PAL to NTSC header)

    When opening a new project in iMovie HD, I have this (DV-PAL) header. I know that I can change the frame 25 to 30 in the preference to make it a NTSC movie. But... what I really want is when opening new projets to have the (DV-NTSC) header. I'm maybe

  • Out put Determination Error

    Hi All, i have created a new out put type and added this output type to an existing output determination procedure. I have assigned this new output type to partner funcitons. Created a condition record for the out put type But when i create the sales

  • ADS - SFP Forms Activation Error

    Dear @all, I have an activation Error in SFP for Z FORMS. ADS is configured and all configuration checks working fine: checked: Hinweis 944221 - Fehleranalyse bei Problemen in der Formularprozessierung checked with repords: FP_CHECK_DESTINATION_SERVI

  • Error Log, what does it mean?

    my java log shows this (I can't get chat window" Error loading class: BrainJavApplet java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: BrainJavApplet      at com/ms/vm/loader/URLClassLoader.loadClass      at com/ms/vm/loader/URLClassLo