In A Perfect World - Using Static Routes In RRAS 2012 To Traverse Sites

I have site-to-site VPN tunnels between my main sites
NYC <--> UK
NYC <----> SANFRAN
NYC <----> BOSTON
NYC <----> MALTA
UK <----> SANFRAN
UK <----> BOSTON
And could see ALL sites when I had my DA/RRAS server using one of the existing subnets (for example, when I used US VPN on NYC DHCP (192.168.2.x) I was able to see EVERYTHING on any site we had a site-to-site VPN with (i.e. from VPN client I could access
MALTA, UK, SANFRAN, BOSTON).
Alas I had to change that to a different subnet (192.168.145.x) and now only see the 192.168.2.x network in NYC.
Is there a way to add static routes on the NYC & UK DA/RRAS servers so this access is restored? Or would this be solved at the Layer 2/3 network level?
Michael P. O'Hara

No, you need to allow forwarding of broadcast packet, but it's really against the best-practice, as you can kill easilly your satellite link.
I agree with you for wins, as I personnaly does not use it and try to remove it when I see someone use it, but it's the only solution for what you want (network discovery over LAN). (even LLTD is not routable beyond router)
Editted: You need to see all machines, but does the enduser must see them ?
Regards, Philippe
Don't forget to mark as answer or vote as
helpful to help identify good information. ( linkedin endorsement never hurt too :o) )
Answer an interesting question ? Create a
wiki article about it!

Similar Messages

Configuring MPLS VPN using static routing

Hi,
I am managed to set up a BGP/MPLS VPN in a laboratory using CS3620 routers running IOS 12.2(3) with ISIS. I am thinking of using static routes among the PE and P routers instead of a IGP. Does anyone know if Cisco routers supports static configuration of LSP? I have tried but could not get it work.

You can very well run MPLS with static routing in the core, as in Cisco we have to meet 2 criterias to have a MPLS forwarding Table.
1) Creating the LIB
This thing lies in having LDP neighborship netween two peers and you have Label bindings.
This is irrespective of what is the best next hop to reach the advertising peers LDP_ID.
2) Creating the LFIB
Now after considering all the Label bindings, the LDP_ID which can be reached out an interface
as a next hop, those Label bindings get installed in the LFIB.
So considering the above two points, we have to be careful in static routes
only for interfaces like Ethernet (Multiaccess Segments).
As in CEF when you give a static route pointing to an Ethernet Interface, CEF creates a
GLean Adjacency (Meaning there could be multiple hosts as the next hop on this segement, and it will glean for the right next-hop)
Now you may observe that when you give a static route only pointing to an Ethernet interface,
you LDP adjacency may come up and you may exchange the bindings with each other. But the Label Forarding Table is not created. This is bcos of this being a Multiaccess interface. And you have
Glean For it. If its a Normal WAN interface like Serial or POS, then there is no problem of
GLean and you would have a Valid Cached Adjacency.
So to avoid probelems with Ethernet interfaces you can simply specify the next-hop-ip address.
For Eg: ip route 10.10.31.250 255.255.255.255 10.10.31.226 (Without the Interface)
ip route 10.10.31.250 255.255.255.255 fa0/0 10.10.31.226 (Or with the Interface)
Only Difference in both is in the first one it has to do a recursive lookup for the outgoing interface. Otherwise both work well. And you can have static routes in your network
running MPLS.
And doing this CEF would would work as it should and you would have a Valid Cached Adjacency.
So this is applicable for Cisco devices which use CEF, including 6500 with SUP720.
HTH-Cheers,
Swaroop

DMVPN will not bring up dynamic tunnel unless using static routes

I have a hub and two spokes and each spoke is bringing up a tunnel to the hub and is routing normally. My problem is that if I try to route from spoke1 (10.30.1.1) to spoke2 (10.30.3.1) it will not bring up a new tunnel but instead will route through the hub.
If I put 'ip route 10.30.3.0 255.255.255.0 tunnel 0' on spoke1, it will then bring up the tunnel to spoke2. I know this is an EIGRP issue (my misconfiguration somewhere), can someone look at the configs and point me in the right direction?
Thanks!!!

Use the Debug commands that run on the hub router confirm that the correct parameters are matched for the spoke and VPN Client connections. Run these debug commands.
debug crypto isakmp-Displays messages about IKE events.
debug crypto ipsec-Displays information about IPsec events.
Here is the configuration guide with the Hub & Spoke example. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk583/tk372/technologies_configuration_example09186a00801eafcb.shtml

Static routes within VRF

Is there a limit to the number of static route one could use within a VRF ?
We have a large customer connected to MPLS VRF based backbone and due to various limiting factors this customer uses static routing from a PE-CE perspective.
We have been experiencing a problem where a static needsto be removed and placed back as routing to a site stops (No traffic passed) , this happes intermittently and to different sites within diffrent regions as well. All the general or expected troubleshooting procedures have been followed i.e. Check routing table , bgp , CEF tables , FIB etc. All seems fine , the only thing that reloves this is removing the static and then replacing it.
My thinking is that there might be a limit to the number of static's that one can use within a VRF and that we have reached the limit for this customer , which causes the intermittent failure.
Please advise.

I know of a "maximum routes limit " command to limit the number of routes in a Vrf on a PE.
From this command reference i find there are no default values for this.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fswtch_r/xrfscmd3.htm#1032272
So I assume, the default is to allow a huge value and the only limitations would be the memory/capacity and the number of vrfs on the PE router.
If you are experiencing a problem in this regard and removing a static route is helping to overcome it, then I would only suspect a bug here.
I am also curious to know how may many static routes you have in this particular vrf.

Configuring static routes at the network edge

We have some Cisco 1750 routers at the edge of our network which are running RIP. We were advised to use static routes on the router, since there was only one route (across a WAN link) for traffic to go from the hub connected to the router, as RIP would only waste the limited bandwidth to the router. We posted this problem previously and got a response which stated :You could set up a default static route on your edge router, run RIP on your internal routers in order to propagate the default, but block the RIP to the outside.
On your edge router, make a default route to your external link. Keep RIP running as before, but add the line redistribute static in your rip configuration. That will get the default route propagated.
Now to stop the RIP on the external interface: If the link is on a different major IP network to your internal network, you can simply not include it in the network commands under rip. But if it is in the same network, then RIP will be enabled on the interface, so you will have to add passive-interface xxxxx, where xxxxx refers to the interface carrying your external link,
Alternatively, you could define your default route using the ip default-network command. This will get propagated automatically into the RIP even without the redistribute command.
We tried it, the problem is that the router is unreachable, via the serial or Ethernet, although if connected to the router via console port, with the configuration screen , you are able to ping external locations, and are able to telnet into the router, but he PC's on the Ethernet side of the router cant see the network.
Assistance\Advice requested.
attached you wll find , the actual reply , and a copy of some info from our work file.

Ernie
I have looked at the config that you posted and I see several issues. The serial interface on Salvage is 172.20.2.2. Your message indicates that it is connected via serial to a 3640 which your message seems to indicate is 172.20.1.4. But that makes the 3640 on a different subnet. Connections over a serial link should be in the same subnet on both ends. (The exception to that is when you are using the ip unnumbered feature - which you are not). I suspect that part of your problem is that the routers do not see themselves on a connected subnet. When you run RIP over the link it can compensate for that to some degree. But when you stop RIP the problem has impact.
Also I see that you have a static default route as Kevin suggested. And in RIP you have redistribute static. But there is no default metric defined. To redistribute into RIP you need a default metric. Another aspect of the problem with the default route is that the next hop for the default route is 172.20.1.4, but without RIP running I believe that Salvage has no idea how to get to that address. You can confirm this by doing show ip route 172.20.1.4 on Salvage. I suspect that you will get an error about route not in table.
Beyond these issues I believe that there is a larger problem of misunderstanding. When I look at your original post in this thread it talks about not running RIP over the serial link. And when I read Kevin's response the first paragraph is describing not running RIP over the serial interface when it says do static default on your edge router and run RIP on your internal router. If you are not running RIP over the serial interface then I see no reason to run RIP on Salvage at all. There is one piece of this that Kevin did not address. If you do not run RIP over the serial link then how does the 3640 know about the Ethernet subnet at Salvage. I believe that the answer is that the 3640 needs to configure a static route to 172.20.27.0 with the 1750 serial interface as the next hop. And if there are other routers that the 3640 communicates with via RIP then the 3640 needs to redistribute static into RIP (remembering to have a default metric).
If you address these issues I believe that you will have connectivity from the central network to the remote subnet on Salvage.
HTH
Rick

Multiple instances of EIGRP or static routes

I'm building a network which needs to have All but one of it's private networks pass through a DMVPN, all the routes are advertised through EIGRP, that part works great!
I have a private VLAN that only has access onto the internet, the address is Nat'ed over to a public IP address. Each router, there's six of them, are neighbors to two other routers. The furthest router to the internet has to go through three routers to get to the internet. My current idea is to use static routes on all the routers to the Internet gateway router. Then let recursive routing sort out each hop. What I would rather do is have EIGRP do all that. I really don't want to mess with the EIGRP that's running for the DMVPN tunnels, I'd like to have another instance of EIGRP run on the routers that will route the users to the Internet.
Does anyone have any thoughts concerning this design.
Thanks.
Mitch

Mitch
I am not clear about what you are attempting to achieve and not very clear about the topology. So my answer may or may not be on target. If it is not perhaps you can help us understand a little better what is involved.
I believe that what you are saying is that you have an existing network with multiple locations connected over DMVPN and that you run EIGRP as the routing protocol for that network. I believe you are also saying that there is one network segment which needs access to the Internet but should not be able to access the other parts of your network.
You say that the address of this other segment is NATed but are not clear whether the translation is ont the router where the segment is located or is on the Internet gateway router.
Probably the traditional solution for this would be to provide a default route for this segment pointing toward the Internet gateway router, to have a route on the Internet gateway router (and other routers along the path toward where the network is located), and a series of access lists on each router along the way which allows passage to the Internet and denies access to local resources.
I would propose a somewhat different solution. I believe that it would work if you configure a GRE tunnel between the router where the segment is located and the Internet Gateway router. On the router where the segment is located you could do Policy Based Routing to send traffic from the private segment to the Internet over the GRE tunnel (which effectively isolates it from your other resources). You might want Policy Based Routing on the Internet gateway router to be sure that traffic from the private segment was forwarded only to the Internet (though you might not need that). The Internet gateway router could have a route (probably a static route) which sends traffic to the private segment over the GRE tunnel.
Let us know what you think of this. And if it is off the mark perhaps you could clarify a bit.
HTH
Rick

Configuring Static Route Tracking Using ASDM 7.1(3) ASA 9.1(2)

I have recently updated my ASA5520 to 9.1(2) and I am using ASDM 7.1(3) to configure Static Route Tracking. I have done this previoussy in earlier version of ASDM without a problem. There seems to be a new field in the Tracked Options section. What is the "Target Interface"? Is it the interface I want to use as the standby route when the Monitor fails? Or is it the Interface that is doing the monitoring?
I have looked through Cisco ASA Series General Operations ASDM Configuration Guide Software Version 7.1, as well as older ASDM books and this field is never listed or described.

Hi,
The target interface will be the interface through which you will be polling some destination IP address with ICMP Echos to determine if the route through that interface is still valid.
So in your case you would use "Outside"
Heres the link to the ASA Command Reference listing the above "type" command under the "sla monitor 1" configuration
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/command-reference/t2.html#wp1568359
- Jouni

Reliable Static Routing Backup Using Object Tracking

Can someone confirm if Reliable Static Routing Using Object Tracking is supported on the Cisco 3850 switch running IOS-XE? If so, does it require IP Services licensing or will IP Base suffice?
If it is not supported on the 3850, what about the 3750X running IOS? Again, would it require IP Services licensing?

Hello
CCO seems to suggest it does
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios-xml/ios/ipapp/configuration/xe-3se/3850/iap-xe-3se-3850-book.pdf#page21
Res
Paul
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App

What syntax would I use to take off a DMZ, Outside static route from a Pix

I am having a problem with mail coming in and currently have all smtp traffic going to a mail filtering server. I want to point the traffic directly to the exchange server instead, but, before I do I want to make sure that I can take that static route off after the test.
This is the syntax that I have and would like to change.
static (DMZ,outside) tcp xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx smtp 172.16.xxx.xxx smtp netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0
I would like to point it to another IPA and then take it off.

Hello,
not sure if this is what you are asking, but check this link to the PIX command reference:
static
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/iaabu/pix/pix_sw/v_63/cmdref/s.htm#wp1026694
HTH,
GP

How do you promote a static route over a directly connected?

Hi all,
I have a need for a static route to be used instead of a directly connected route. (Long story - involving firewalls and anti-spoofing.. but can go further if required)
I am using a Cisco 3750 switch. I notice directly connected routes have a metric of 0, and the highest metric I can give a static route is 1.
Therefore, how is it possible for me to make the switch use the static route and not the directly connected?
Any help would be appreciated!
Cheers,
Ben

Hi Rick,
Thanks for your patience.
Maybe I should start again.
Initially we had 16 VLANs within the 10.0/16 address space. We have some Cisco 3750's connected by dark fibre accross a couple of kms and then lower access switches all hanging of these by some means. The network is flat.
We have a checkpoint firewall hanging off one of the 3750s connected using a TRUNK port. The firewall has an IP address on all VLANs and is used to route traffic between VLANs based on its ruleset.
So if I have a user in VLAN 10 who wants to talk to VLAN 20, they travel to the firewall, if a rule permits the access, the firewall routes the packet on to VLAN 2 and the switches deliver at Layer 2.
The switches all have their default VLAN 1 disabled, and have an IP address on our management VLAN to allow us to manage the switches.
Its quite important that this IP is on a secured management VLAN as we don't want just anyone being able to snoop switch logins etc..
If we need to login to a switch, the firewall routes our traffic from whatever VLAN we are on to the Management VLAN.
One of our VLANs (the Desktop VLAN) is quite large (approx 1300 hosts) and suffers a great deal from too much arp broadcast traffic.
As we have a flat switched network across several kms, the cost of putting in routers to subnet this large VLAN is excessive.
However, the 3750's we have are perfectly capable of routing between VLANs, so we decide to create a load of new VLANs instead of subnetting our large VLAN. We don't want to use the firewall to route between these new VLANs as thats just giving the firewall more to do, and previously all these hosts were on a single subnet, so we have no need for any strict security - at most we can use ACLs on the switches if we even need that!
So far so good.
With 1300 hosts, we obviously can't make sudden topology changes. Therefore we need to be able to route between the Desktop VLAN and the new VLANs.
We therefore introduce the static routes between the firewall and the switches.
So the firewall says:
route 10.1.0.0/16 via Multilayer switch IP on 10.1.0.0/16
The multilayer switch says:
route 10.0.0.0/16 via Firewall IP on 10.1.0.0/16
This allows routing perfectly between the Desktop VLAN and the new VLANs.
However the moment we enable ip routing on the switches we break access between the desktop VLAN and the Management VLAN.
A packet leaves the desktop VLAN through the default gateway on the firewall. This is then routed to the Management VLAN. The return packet doesn't use the Management VLAN default gateway (firewall), it follows the static route on the switch and ends up at the firewall on 10.1.0.0/16. This is subsequently dropped as the firewall knows the packet hasn't come from the 10.1.0.0/16 network, it originally came from the desktop VLAN on 10.0.0.0/16.
It might seem we can define a route on the switch to say:
route 10.0.50.0/24 (management VLAN) via 10.0.50.254 (firewall). However, this would result in all packets from 10.1.0.0/16 being dropped by the firewall.
The other problem is that if we are on a new VLAN and want to talk to the management VLAN. The packet goes to its default gateway on the switch. The switch says - "I have an IP on the management VLAN, its directly connected" - therefore it ignores the static route, and passes the packet on its way. We have now bypassed the firewall, which is bad.
Incidentally the return packets get routed through the firewall and dropped, as the original packet didn't come through the firewall, there is no entry in the state table for its return.
I think if we turned off the management interface on the switch and managed it through the interface on 10.1.0.0/16, I assume everything would work. However, we don't want to do this for a whole load of other reasons I wont go into.
Im sure there must be a fairly simple solution - I just don't have enough experience!
Cheers,
Ben

Default static route and Null 0

Hi Everyone,
Need to clear some doubts for below setup
Switch 3550A is connected to Internet Router and has OSPF nei relationship with it.
3550A#                      sh run int fa0/11
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 272 bytes
interface FastEthernet0/11
description OSPF LAN Connection to 2691 Router Interface Fas 0/1
no switchport
ip address 192.168.5.2 255.255.255.254
sh ip route shows
3550A#sh ip route
Gateway of last resort is 192.168.5.3 to network 0.0.0.0
O*E2 0.0.0.0/0 [110/1] via 192.168.5.3, 20:39:56, FastEthernet0/11
3550A#
All is working fine.
For testing purposes i config below static route on 3550A
ip default-network 192.168.1.0
ip route 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 Null0
After above change
3550A#           sh ip route
Codes: C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
       D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
       N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
       E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2
       i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2
       ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static route
       o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route
Gateway of last resort is not set
S*   192.168.1.0/24 is directly connected, Null0
O*E2 0.0.0.0/0 [110/1] via 192.168.5.3, 20:38:38, FastEthernet0/11
Now i can not ping to internet as below
3550A#ping 4.2.2.2
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 4.2.2.2, timeout is 2 seconds:
Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
When we ping from Switch then source IP is always the Outside interface IP right?
So in this case Switch is using which IP as source?
Ping to internet is not working as default network is set to 192.168.1.0 and all request goes to this IP and then it goes to
Null interface right?
Extended ping works fine as below
3550A#ping
Protocol [ip]:
Target IP address: 4.2.2.2
Repeat count [5]:
Datagram size [100]:
Timeout in seconds [2]:
Extended commands [n]: y
Source address or interface: 192.168.5.2
Type of service [0]:
Set DF bit in IP header? [no]:
Validate reply data? [no]:
Data pattern [0xABCD]:
Loose, Strict, Record, Timestamp, Verbose[none]:
Sweep range of sizes [n]:
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 4.2.2.2, timeout is 2 seconds:
Packet sent with a source address of 192.168.5.2
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 76/79/80 ms
Second thing to confirm is this ping works because 192.168.5.2 is directly connected to Internet Router interface?
Regards
MAhesh

Hi Mahesh,
When we ping from Switch then source IP is always the Outside interface IP right?
That is correct. By default it is always the outgoing interface on the device unless you specify it differently.
Ping to internet is not working as default network is set to 192.168.1.0 and all request goes to this IP and then it goes to
Null interface right?
That is correct. Null0 can't be used as next-hop.
Second thing to confirm is this ping works because 192.168.5.2 is directly connected to Internet Router interface?
No, that is because 192.168.5.0/30 is NATed. Remember 192.168.x.x address is a private segment and cannot access the Internet unless NAT is used.
HTH
Reza

Advertise implicit-null label for static routes

Hi, I want to ask if there is any way to change the label or stop adveritise label for an static route. Normally LDP advertises an Implicit Null label for directly connected routes. We want to do similar thing for static routes.
We need to do this is because somehow we need to do rate-limit on the PE interface connecting to the core network instead of the interface connecting to CE. As the incoming packets still got labelled, the rate-limit is skipped. So we want to stop the PE creates label for the static routes or advertises them with implicit null label. Thanks in advance.

Calvin,
Bear in mind that if you only enter the "no mpls ldp advertise-label" command, LDP will stop propagating all labels, which might not ba what you want. If you selectively want to propagate certain labels, then you need to also use "mpls advertise label for " as Shivlu suggested.
Regards,

Check for Null in Mediator Static Routing filter

Using Expression Builder for Mediator component how can I check the values for NULL in a particular XML element. In my case the XSD is
<xs:complexType name="OdsCadDataSet">
<xs:choice>
<xs:element name="odsCadCase" type="OdsCadCase" minOccurs="0"
maxOccurs="1"/>
<xs:element name="odsCadEvent" type="OdsCadEvent" minOccurs="0"
maxOccurs="1"/>
<xs:element name="odsCadUnitStatus" type="OdsCadUnitStatus"
minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1"/>
</xs:choice>
</xs:complexType>
I want to check in expression builder of mediator whether odsCase, odsCadEvent, odsCadUnitStatus is been processed. I have three static routing for each element and plan to put filter which checks is odsCadCase is null and so forth. How to have this use case.
Thanks
Edited by: user5108636 on 28/06/2010 00:15

helo, i have same problem here...
I have a xsd:choice on request like this:
<message>
<properties>
<property name="tracking.compositeInstanceId" value="80003"/>
<property name="tracking.ecid" value="0000J1MQVAZBDC^5lVg8yZ1DtZWJ000T5r"/>
<property name="transport.http.remoteAddress" value="10.106.17.137"/>
</properties>
<parts>
<part name="request">
<ns1:parametrosConsultaGuia>
<ns1:guiaCompensacaoRequest>
<ns1:anoGuia>2011</ns1:anoGuia>
<ns1:numeroGuia>314</ns1:numeroGuia>
<ns1:codigoFatoGerador>6</ns1:codigoFatoGerador>
<ns1:codigoPorte>77011</ns1:codigoPorte>
</ns1:guiaCompensacaoRequest>
<ns1:guiaComplementarRequest>
<ns1:codigoEntidade/>
<ns1:classeEmbarcacao/>
<ns1:codigoPorte/>
<ns1:codigoAssunto/>
<ns1:fatoGerador/>
<ns1:numeroTransacaoInternet/>
</ns1:guiaComplementarRequest>
<ns1:guiaDesarquivamentoRequest>
<ns1:codigoAssunto/>
<ns1:idPessoa/>
</ns1:guiaDesarquivamentoRequest>
<ns1:guiaDividaAtivaRequest>
<ns1:numeroDebito/>
<ns1:codigoUsuario/>
</ns1:guiaDividaAtivaRequest>
<ns1:guiaNormalRequest>
<ns1:codigoEntidade/>
<ns1:codigoAssunto/>
<ns1:fatoGerador/>
<ns1:numeroTransacaoInternet/>
</ns1:guiaNormalRequest>
<ns1:guiaReferenciaRequest>
<ns1:numeroGuiaPai/>
<ns1:anoGuiaPai/>
<ns1:codigoEntidade/>
<ns1:classeEmbarcacao/>
<ns1:codigoAssunto/>
</ns1:guiaReferenciaRequest>
<ns1:guiaRemanescenteRequest>
<ns1:numeroDebito/>
<ns1:codigoUsuario/>
</ns1:guiaRemanescenteRequest>
<ns1:guiaMultaRequest>
<ns1:codigoEntidade/>
<ns1:dataVencimento/>
<ns1:valorMulta/>
<ns1:percentualDesconto/>
<ns1:percentualAcrescimo/>
</ns1:guiaMultaRequest>
</ns1:parametrosConsultaGuia>
</part>
</parts>
</message>
I tried everything to check if some of the requests are filled but allways mediator returns null:
03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemEvaluation of xpath condition "string-length($in.request/guia:guiaRequest/guia:parametrosConsultaGuia/guia:guiaReferenciaRequest) > 0" resulted false
<payload>
Atividade03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemonCase "GuiaCompensacao.getGuiaCompensacao"
03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemEvaluation of xpath condition "$in.request/guia:guiaRequest/guia:parametrosConsultaGuia/guia:guiaCompensacaoRequest != ''" resulted false
<payload>
Atividade03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemonCase "GuiaRemanescenteService.getGuiaRemanescente"
03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemEvaluation of xpath condition "string-length($in.request/guia:guiaRequest/guia:parametrosConsultaGuia/guia:guiaRemanescenteRequest) > 0" resulted false
<payload>
Atividade03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemonCase "GuiaMultaService.gerarBoleto"
03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemEvaluation of xpath condition "string-length($in.request/guia:guiaRequest/guia:parametrosConsultaGuia/guia:guiaMultaRequest) > 0" resulted false
<payload>
Atividade03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemonCase "GuiaDividaAtiva.getGuiaDividaAtiva"
03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemEvaluation of xpath condition "string-length($in.request/guia:guiaRequest/guia:parametrosConsultaGuia/guia:guiaDividaAtivaRequest) > 0" resulted false
<payload>
Atividade03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemonCase "GuiaDesarquivamento.getGuiaDesarquivamento"
03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemEvaluation of xpath condition "string-length($in.request/guia:guiaRequest/guia:parametrosConsultaGuia/guia:guiaDesarquivamentoRequest) > 0" resulted false
<payload>
Atividade03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemonCase "GuiaComplementarService.gerarBoleto"
03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemEvaluation of xpath condition "string-length($in.request/guia:guiaRequest/guia:parametrosConsultaGuia/guia:guiaComplementarRequest) > 0" resulted false
<payload>
Atividade03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemonCase "GuiaNormalService.gerarBoleto"
03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemEvaluation of xpath condition "string-length($in.request/guia:guiaRequest/guia:parametrosConsultaGuia/guia:guiaNormalRequest) > 0" resulted false
<payload>

How to connect my ipad using static ip

How to connect my ipad using static ip?
Using Netgear Router.

Go to Setting > General > Network > WiFi > Then tap the blue icon next to your network, from here you can setup a static IP on your internal network.

Is there a way to add a static route in an Ipod touch ?

I am trying to get the ipod touch to configure correctly for our wireless network.
The wireless side does not provide DNS or DHCP directly . Rather this is done from a different
subnet . This assists to a small extent with our wirless security in that the attacker must also know
routing address and DNS and DHCP addresses to steal web access. In windows or Linux this can be done
by route add (DHCP IP Address) netmask 255.255.255.255 (gateway IP address)
and route add (DNS IP Address) netmask 255.255.255.255 (gateway IP address)
and manually specifying the DNS and DHCP addresses. Even if i manually enter the
the IP address without a simple static route I will not get DNS services across the gateway.
I am no apple expert but route add has been in use since the internet was still on 2 wheels
surely this can still be done ?
Thanks in advance

hi!
have you seen javax.swing.JMenuItem ?
and have a look into
http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/uiswing/components/menu.html
:)

In A Perfect World - Using Static Routes In RRAS 2012 To Traverse Sites

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for