In Logic X surround panner grayed in pre-fader freeze mode

In Logic X surround panner grayed - can't change anything -  in pre-fader freeze mode. Logic 9 works fine. There is some new setup i loose? Thanks

the peak level display got an error -0.1db and in some cases -0.2db, when Apple will launch an update for such a serious problem? this can compromise a complete mastering

Similar Messages

  • STP 2.0 Ls Rs problem in surround panner?

    I have an audio track that I only want heard in the rear (Ls and Rs) -- so if I move the head point to the rear I hear very faint audio from my Ls and Rs speakers (even with max vol settings).
    As a work around to this problem I use the rotation value and rotate 180 degrees which provides clear loud audio in my Ls and Rs speakers.
    I'm also a Logic Pro 7 user -- when using the very same audio file (Electrical Noise 2.aiff) the surround panner in Logic works as expected -- meaning I move head point to the rear and audio is place in the Ls and Rs. This also validates that I have all my hardware/speakers setup correctly.
    So I guess I'm a little confused at why STP is different than Logic Pro and why I need to rotate 180 degrees in surround panner to get good volume out of my Ls and Rs channels?
    Did I miss something obvious? The submixes are set to Surround 1-6. Is this a bug or did Apple decide that the Logic Pro 7 version is wrong and STP way is right??
    Very confused.
    Rob.

    Hi Rob,
    I was trying to do the same thing (pan a stereo signal to just the Ls Rs speakers), and I think I found a way to get it to work. Try setting the collapse parameter all the way to the right.
    Then, if you drag the panner puck about 1/2 of the way back (between the first and second concentric circles on the big panner), you'll see that the left and right blobby things are right in front of the Ls and Rs speakers, and the stereo track comes out of Ls & Rs exclisively. That seemed to work for me. Does that avoid the rotate 180 degrees approach you were using?

  • Is pre-fader metering in Logic Express possible?

    The manual says:
    "Activation of Audio > Pre-Fader Metering ensures that the level displayed by the level meters is measured pre fader..."
    But I don't have this option in Logic Express 7.2.3 - is this just me, or is it a manual misprint for a feature only available for Logic Pro?
    Cheers
    Powerbook G4 12 1.5GHz 512MB, iMac G3 400MHz 320MB   Mac OS X (10.4.10)   Logic Express 7.2.3

    Logic Pro only.
    "Express" = very limited version.
    Cheers

  • Pre-fader TRIM in logic?

    pro tools has a pre-fader TRIM plug-in... with it, you can attenuate a track BEFORE it hits a plug in.
    does anyone know if there is an equivalent in Logic Express 7.1?
    just bringing the fader down a bit doesn't work, because (as I understand it) all logic plugs are pre-fader.

    In the Logic>Helper> plug in list, you will find "Gain" you can use this to do what you want. It will make sure that no peaking will happen going into the plugin.
    Although many would dispute this doesn't matter as the logic mixer is 32 bit therefore has head room way above 0dB. I dunno myself and think it's worth keeping those levels down.
    It also makes plugins behave more as you'd expect if the level going into them is reasonble. It's hard to stop a compressor over compressing if the level going into it is too high etc.

  • Hola, tengo un problema al editar 7.1 surround. Configuro el proyecto para que sea 7.1 y tengo todo listo pero en el surround panner solo me aparecen 5 canales. No me salen los laterales. Que puedo hacer para tenerlos y que que en el bounce me lo haga con

    hola, tengo un problema al editar 7.1 surround. Configuro el proyecto para que sea 7.1 y tengo todo listo pero en el surround panner solo me aparecen 5 canales. No me salen los laterales. Que puedo hacer para tenerlos y que que en el bounce me lo haga con 8 canales y no con 6?

    Lo del antivirus no me quedó muy claro, la verdad es que como uso Mac, no tengo el antivirus corriendo siempre, casi nunca en verdad, y no creo que tenga que ver con eso.
    Sobre los archivos compartidos, no es el caso, estos archivos no lo están.
    Cuando me pasa esto, si le pongo a guardar por segunda vez... pues es lo mismo, igual una tercera, cuarta, etc.. Las dos únicas soluciones que he encontrado son: 1. cerrar el documento abierto de Indesign y, 2. guardar el archivo tif bajo otro nombre (save as...), pero esto último no es lo más práctico que hay...
    Pienso que el problema es que Photoshop cree que el archivo está abierto, lógicamente. ¿Por qué pasa esto? Solamente está abierto un archivo Indesign que contiene vinculado el archivo en cuestión. Insisto que es un problema de CS4. Sin ir más lejos, cuando efectivamente lograba guardar correctamente el archivo en PS y volvía a ID, el archivo se actualizaba sin problemas. Pero si vuelvo a hacer un cambio en PS, guardo y vuelvo a ID, el archivo no se vuelve a actualizar automáticamente (como lo hacía en CS3 y versiones anteriores), esta vez es necesario actualizarlo manualmente a cada vez... Según me han respondido en Adobe, esto se debe a que han reconstruido completamente el panel de vínculos, y al parecer quedaron cosas inconclusas... varias cosas.
    Bueno el dato de Snow Leopard! me actualizaré apenas pueda, al menos hay solución para ese otro problema!
    Sl2

  • Surround Panner using realtime

    Regards,
    I have a Yamaha receiver 5.1 system, which is connected via optical cable to the my MacPro G5. I want to use the surround panner in STP, but when I moves sound in surround panner to the desired speaker, the sound can not hear the desired speaker. I hear only L, C, R, not Ls, Rs,
    Whether someone knows where the error, why can not I hear exactly the right channel loudspeaker. When I create a DVD and watch it through the DVD player then the channels are well arranged,
    tnx,

    It depends on your budget. MOTU interfaces are excellent. Something like the MOTU Ultralite is great:
    http://www.motu.com/products/motuaudio/ultralite-mk3/
    Also, you may want to check our Focusrite products:
    http://www.focusrite.com/products/#ranges_saffire
    Remember you'll want to have discrete analog inputs for your 6 channels on your receiver

  • Logic Pro X pre fader send

    Hi, I noticed when you select a send as pre fader in LPX it does not turn green anymore.
    I thought it was good before in LP9, so that you knew it was a pre fader and not post.
    Anyboby else found that?
    Thanks

    Hi!
    I always had a hard time telling those two colors apart. So much easier now: the Pre Fader knob is to the left, the Post Fader is to the right of the square with the text "Bus".
    /J

  • Levels and pre-fader metering

    In the past I had always presumed the channel fader controlled the volume level of a softsynth. I know now that it obviously does not. It simply acts as a "faucet," so to speak. Meaning that increasing the fader level simply allows more of the synth's signal to pass.
    So my question is this: Understanding that it is the instrument itself which is actually generating the signal (and consequetly the db's) should I keep all my faders at 0.00 on my audio instrument tracks and adjust the instrument levels instead when I mix? It would seem to make sense.
    And in keeping with this method, as far as automation is concerned, would I be correct in assuming track volume should be automated via the instrument level?
    I'm trying to keep all of this in the context of how it would be done in a studio with "real" instruments. Where the volume level is the volume level and if you want it louder you play harder or you turn up your amp. You want it softer you play your instrument softer.
    I should add that this whole question/conundrum came up after I started recording with pre fader metering enabled and was quite surprised to see just how easy it is to clip a track (remembering of course that as long as no clipping is occuring at the master output I'm NOT actually clipping).

    I don't know where all this "fader fear" is coming from.
    In DSP terms, making something louder or quieter is simply a really simple DSP calculation. It doesn't matter whether you turn you softsynth down 3dB, or turn the fader down 3dB, the end result is exactly the same.
    The faders are there for easy controlling of levels. It's why mixers were invented and designed this way.
    I think these days someone reads a post on some esoteric audio forum about how their mix was so much better when they left the fader at 0dB in some obscure DAW back in the 90's, and translate that into "I must never use faders" or "I must never EQ" or "I must effectively work out my mix beforehand by my mic choice and positioning so all the signals magically combine into an artistic mix."
    I'm trying to keep all of this in the context of how it would be done
    in a studio with "real" instruments. Where the volume level is the
    volume level and if you want it louder you play harder or you turn
    up your amp.
    You completely lost me here. Learning about gain staging is Elementary Audio Engineering Class 2 (the one afer the "what is a signal", and "what is a transducer").
    You set the level of your recording device or mixer's input depending on the item you are recording, so the natural sound of whatever your source is corresponds to some nominal level for your recorder. It doesn't just magically happen on its own.
    If you're recording an instrument that doesn't put out much sound level, you use the mic preamp to boost the signal to an appropriate recording level. And if you're recording Concorde taking off, you adjust your preamp, probably turning it down or padding the signal, again so it fits the range of your recorder.
    Softsynths can put out a lot of level, and many preset designers don't pay much attention to volume levels in their patches. In addition, when you play a patch polyphonically, you're mixing together multiple signals (each of the notes you are playing) so you end up with higher levels still. It's good practice to pull down the output of the synth if it's too hot, but generally speaking, and avoiding getting into any "levels in Logic" complexities here, using the fader in Logic is exactly the same process.
    Faders don't bite. Use 'em.

  • Pre Fader Metering Query...

    Hello to all,
    I've been following a couple of threads recently and the topic of Pre Fader Metering has come up in regards to the level of the final stereo Output. I would like a little more clarification on this.
    My individual track levels often times are in the "red" Pre Fader, but that seemingly never has anything to do with my final stereo output level; it's my Post Fader level of each track that affects it.
    How, if at all, does the Pre Fader level affect the final stereo output? Since Logic has 32-bit floating point architecture, isn't there a ton of headroom on individual track level and its like impossible to really overload/clip?
    Thanks in advance for any insight on this.
    M-DAY

    Yeah - sorry for the headrush, that thread was a doozy!
    Yes, the same issues occur on for plugins in any audio path - if they use a fixed-point implementation, like for instance some Waves plugins do, or have low input headroom, then you can be distorting the audio through the input stage before the plugin is even doing anything, if you send in high or over-0dB values.
    It is quite posible to clip the outputs slightly without really hearing much - the ear is used to small amounts of distortion, but you are damaging and changing the audio by doing so. Some people like this effect and even use it regularly.
    Personally, there is a very good argument for keeping mix levels way below the 0dB point - 24-bit audio is fine for this, you don't lose resolution by turning the volume down, which is a popular misconception.
    And any distortion you add into the chain, make sure it's introduced and controlled by an artistic decision, not a side-effect of not understanding what's happening...

  • Pre Fader AUX Sends....

    Is it possible to set up aux sends in Logic to be pre fader?
    Dual G5   Mac OS X (10.4.7)  

    I've been looking through the manuals and menu's and I have not found the Pre-fader option.... Could you direct me to whatever menu I need to go to?
    2.7Ghz Dual G5 | RME Fireface 800 | Tonelux Mixer    

  • Pre-fader vs. post-fader metering

    I generally avoid any internal clipping on my virtual instruments by making use of logic's pre-fader metering option, is this really necessary?
    Which is best, mix post fader and forget about internal levels of plug-ins, instruments etc. or always make sure there is no internal clipping?
    What are the results really when making sure there is no post or pre fader clipping?

    Chance Harper wrote:
    I did a quick experiment to see what the result would be if I overloaded or pushed the internal volume of a plug-in but made sure the output channel wasn't clipping VS. a plug-in that got leveled pre and post.
    I used only a drum kit from battery 3 with a simple riff. Pushed the plug-ins overall volume to +6.0dB and then made sure my post fader level wasn't clipping, both of them then got mastered using ozone 4.
    Both of the tracks reached the same RMS level, neither of the two sounded louder than the other.
    The one I pushed up in the plug-in sounded a bit squashed and not as clear or pure as the one that considered the pre and post fader metering. The drums sounded way more defined and clear when ensuring both pre-and post metering wasn't clipping.
    It does seem that by ensuring none of your virtual stuff clips internally you get purer sound.
    Of course I am sure you could still get a great sound if you internally only pushed it over by 2dBs. Still think it's best though to mix pre and post as a rule. Any comments?
    Message was edited by: Chance Harper
    Message was edited by: Chance Harper
    Message was edited by: Chance Harper
    again, i would agree with BeeJay's original reply to the original post. it's not good practice to let internal levels fly out of control and there's really no good reason to. and i would also agree that keeping levels lower result in better quality mixes.

  • Pre-Fader Sends

    When assigning a "Send" going to a reverb bus as "Pre-Fader", the signal on that track becomes audible on all other tracks. For example, placing a "Pre-Fader" reverb send onto a vocal track makes the vocals audible on any other track that I solo. I thought it may be tied to the "solo" function, so I tried muting all tracks, and I will hear vocals on any track that I un-mute. I had another Logic Pro 9 user try it on his machine and he re-created it too. Pre-Fader Sends are not that common in use, but has anyone else noticed this bug?
    //Andy

    PapaPugs wrote:
    When assigning a "Send" going to a reverb bus as "Pre-Fader", the signal on that track becomes audible on all other tracks. For example, placing a "Pre-Fader" reverb send onto a vocal track makes the vocals audible on any other track that I solo. I thought it may be tied to the "solo" function, so I tried muting all tracks, and I will hear vocals on any track that I un-mute. I had another Logic Pro 9 user try it on his machine and he re-created it too. Pre-Fader Sends are not that common in use, but has anyone else noticed this bug?
    //Andy
    This is not a bug. This is how 'pre-fader' sends work.
    By "pre-fader", it means that signal from your track is being sent to the reverb bus no matter what your channel's fader is set to.
    When you solo a track, if it's sending any signal to the reverb bus then the reverb bus is included in the 'solo' signal. And if other tracks (even non-soloed ones) are sending to that reverb bus as well, you'll hear their reverb as well. To clarify, when you solo a track that's sending to an effects bus, you'll hear the both the solo'd track AND the entire FX Bus it's sending to.
    It would be nice if Logic was smart enough to mute all the other fx sends of non-solo'd tracks... But that's not how solo works in Logic (or in most old school analog mixers).

  • No pre-fader solo?

    I'm using Logic 9.1.6, with system 10.6.8. I have a headphone mix that is routed via pre-fader sends out bus 3 & 4 to outputs 3 & 4, which go out of my audio interface into my headphone amp.
    I used to be able to solo my faders or channel strips, and it wouldn't mute my pre-fader sends to headphones. It now mutes pre-fader headphone sends too. I've changed the settings on preferences/audio/general/Track-Mute Solo between Slow Response & Fast Response.

    Holy schmoly! When did Logic start requiring "solo safe" on busses and aux sends in order to have true pre-fader solo on the aux busses? This drove me crazy!
    For people who are searching for the answer to this, this is the method that fixed it for me.
    1. Go to the environment. Find the Aux and Bus fader strips that you're using for your headphone mix.
    2. Click on each fader strip's "solo" button while holding control, putting them in "solo safe" indicated by a diagonal red line through the button.
    Get a beer. You win.
    When did this system start? The previous method, where you didn't have to use "solo safe" worked just fine for me. Bleh.
    Happy recording.

  • Pre-fader metering

    How many of you guys make use of pre-fader metering? Is it recommended?
    I noticed that as soon as I turned it on a lot of my channels clipped and that I actually had to sort that out internally with a lot of the AU instruments, like RMX.
    Let me hear some of your thoughts on this?
    Thanks.

    and it shows clipping,
    Clipping? What, you mean that some of the meters are red, rather than orange? That's not clipping, that's just to indicate you have high levels.
    that equals distortion doesn't it?
    No. You can't really clip in a 32-bit floating point DAW. The only place you can clip are at the outputs - for this reason, you must always come in under 0dBFS to print the final mix.
    But inside the mixer, you can have very high signal levels. It's possible for instance, to take an audio channel, add +1500dB (yes, fifteen hundred dB), and then on the output channel, reduce the gain by 1500dB, and you will still have a good, undistorted signal.
    This is the benefit of implementing mixers with floating point maths (as they pretty much all are, these days) rather than fixed point maths.
    However, good practice says that your audio channel levels shouldn't be too high, use 24-bit audio, and avoid running everything into above 0dBFS levels for a number of reasons - this also helps keep your mix levels under control.

  • Pre-Fader Metering on Output

    Hello all.
    While pre-fader metering is working great on all the channels - there is no difference registering on the master output (Output 1+2) when I toggle PFM off and on. I am sending it 16 very hot signals and only the output fader can change the meter reading.
    Any ideas
    Paul
    PS - I love having this on the transport as a button - that and low-latency mode!

    Nope.
    If you put a few channels of noise that feed into Outputs 1+2, set the output fader to -50 or so, and then toggle the Pre-Post metering button, can you get a different reading from it?
    Paul

Maybe you are looking for

  • Voice memos on iPhone automatically go to iTunes

    Every time I record a voice memo on my iPhone, it shows up in my music library in iTunes. SO I delete it. But is there a way to prevent it from showing up there in the first place?

  • China - Custom Tax, VAT Tax Handling

    Hi SAP friends I have the problem of Import custom tax and VAT tax for puchasing. It is Domestic Sales scenario. Need to purchase material from oversea vendor. Oversea vendor sell mateiral to China company RMB 100 per PC. Mainland company needs to pa

  • Search Logic in Knowledge Search ?

    Hi Experts, I log in with IC_AGENT business role. In knowledge Search workcentre link, I passed the text as a* in search term on "Text Search" tab, then on "Attribute Search" tab i selected knowledge base as solution database, category as validation

  • PSE 10 default program

    I have installed PSE 10 but it does not show up in the default program list in windows 7. I am unable to right click on an image file and go to open with and select elements 10. Would be grateful for any help.

  • ECM: Appraisal score in Planning I-view

    Hi, In the planning I-view you can customize the columns you want to show the user in view V_TWPC_ACOL. My customer would like to have the appraisal score in this view as well. Now the appraisal score is only visable when you go to the detailed emplo