In subcontracting the component quantity consumed more than the BOM quantit

Dear Experts,
In subcontracting the component quantity ( 543) consumed more than the BOM quantity while doing GR, so please let me know what may be the possible reasons for the same.
Regards,
Balu

Balu
may be the suncontractor needed more than the BOM quantiy.It is the case of overconsumption of components.

Similar Messages

How to restrict the delivery quantity not more than target quantity?

Dear Gurus,
How to restrict the delivery quantity not more than target quantity in a scheduling agreement? I think there are 2 methods.
1. I found that setting 0 in Overdelivery Tolerance Limit in Info Record is not effective. Why?
2. I want to set E for the message but can't find the place. The message is generated when entering and saving quantity as delivery quantity that is larger than target quantity. How can I set E to a message (067, as I remember)
Any other effective method? Please advice. Thanks.
Regards,
David

Dear all,
It is not OK after checking everywhere you mentioned. I tested in 2 clients. In the development enviroment client, it works whatever E or W. In test enviroment, it does not work (meassge is W).
I think there must be somewhere besides of those you menetioned.
I notes that SAP help for the overdelivery tollerance setting of scheduling agreement:
Overdelivery Tolerance Limit
Percentage (based on the order quantity) up to which an overdelivery of this item will be accepted.
Dependencies
If you have set the indicator in the Partial delivery/Item field to 'D' (partial delivery allowed), this takes priority. It makes no sense to define a tolerance limit for overdelivery in such case.
Where can I see: 'the indicator in the Partial delivery/Item field to 'D' (partial delivery allowed)'? I want to check it.
Pls help! Thanks.
Regards,
David

Info cube key figure quantity is more than the data source

Hi,
I am loading data from a custom table data source into an info cube. The data records and key figure quantity of the info cube is more than the data source custom table.
I checked the extraction in RSA3. The number of records records and key figure quantity are exactly extracted from the data source in RSA3 transaction.
But after loading using the info package, the number of records and the key figure quantity of the info cube is more than the actual records available in the data source. The update rule is simple 1 to 1 mapping.
Kindly help to troubleshoot this issue.
thanks and regards
Murugesan

Hi,
There could be some other data already avilable in the Infocube. Pls take the Request ID or Number from the last run of the Infopackage you used and check the records only for that Request ID in Infocube.
You can check the data in the LISTCUBE Transaction.
Please let me know of you need additional information.
Thanks,
Jeysraj

System is allowing to post the Adv Pmt amount more than the PO Value

Hi Experts,
I am FICO Consultant. I facing one problem regarding Advance Payment. We have a process to for making advance payment with reference to Purchase Order and Purchase Order Line Item. But system is allowing to post the advance payment amount more than the Purchase Order Value. I want to prevent this to happen. The system should not allow to make advance payment more than the Purchase Order value.
Please help me on this issue.
Thanks in Advance and Regards,
Alkesh Mistry

HI
Please create the Advance payment request with PO number using sp gl indicator as F and then make the advance payment using the request.
Regds
Rajiv

What makes the iPhone cost $ 400 more than the iPod?

An iPod costs $ 199, an iPhone $ 645 (unlocked). Thats more than $ 400 in difference and 200% in ratio.
I know that keeping-carrier-signal mechanism eats a lot of power, there is a need for stronger battery, but a 200% up in price.

You need to create a user account for your wife (or yourself depending on who has the current user account). When syncing, each of you should sign in as a separate user, login to iTunes and then sync. I had this problem when my sister got an iPhone. When we did her initial sync, everything on my iPhone showed up on hers. Apple gave me this solution.

Why do I still love the 2nd gen iPod more than the new offerings?

Hello fellow forum users.
I've been reading these forums for over a year now, but only recently did I register in order to post on this forum. I'm a real music nut and I've owned virtually every iPod since I bought my first one three years (a 1st gen iPod mini). At the moment I own the iPod classic (both 80gb and 160gb versions), an iPod touch 8gb, iPod nano 2nd gen 8gb, iPod nano 3rd gen 4gb, iPod shuffle 2nd gen and since last night I've been the proud owner of an iPhone!
Anyway, I've always wanted to own either a 1st or second gen iPod (the firewire version). I was a poor student when the 1st gen was released way back in 2001, so I'd never seen one apart from photos on the web and watching Steve Jobs' original iPod keynote speech on YouTube. I'd been scouring eBay for the last 6 months for one, but mint examples were going for several hundred pounds, or the other versions I could find were either faulty or completely wrecked. I managed to pick a 2nd gen 10gb iPod up a week ago (just the iPod and the slipcase it originally came with.) After buying a firewire cable and charger from eBay for a couple of pounds, I synced the iPod with my Windows XP laptop and I was away to go!
The thing is (and the reason I've posted this discussion) is how the build quality on the new ipods seems to be lacking compared to a device released 6 years ago. Although the 2nd gen has the same stare-at-me-and-I'll-scratch chrome backplate as my 6th gens, the front hardly has a mark and feels like a rhino could stand on it before it is damaged. The hold switch is big (and less fiddly for my bigger fingers), the headphone jack is secure and the plastic covering on the firewire port is still on sits nicely to protect the firewire port.
Regarding firewire, I think it's a big shame Apple have abandoned this format. As someone who syncs many gbs of music every week, I synced over 1300 songs to it in under 10 minutes (would take my 6 gens over 20 minutes). Even charging via firewire is slightly faster.
I also feel that the sound quality is superior on my 2nd gen and when comparing it to my 6th gen there is a clear difference in sound quality, clarity and the presence of a noticeable background hiss on both the 6th gens and the iPod Touch.
I know you're going to say that the new gen iPods have better battery life, supports videos and pictures, but as a music player I still think my 2nd gen still has lots to offer. I don't know, perhaps I'm becoming nostalgic in my old age! What do you think?

you're absolutely right. i have a selection of newer iPods, an iPhone, etc. and in my desk drawer i also have the very first 5GB iPodl, purchased the week they were released, and a 2nd generation 20GB, which i happened to charge up tonight (i was thinking about ditching it because i never use it anymore). well, then i listened to it. i was blown away. i'd forgotten how good the old iPods sound. so rich, so dynamic, with a kind of -- i don't know how to describe it -- velvety warmth to the sound. the iPhone, by comparison, has a flat electronic quality to it, as does the new shuffle. it seems like in the effort to make things smaller they've cut corners on the sound processing. i don't know. needless to say, i won't be ditching my old 20GB anytime soon. what a gem.

Confirmed quantity more than the ordered quantity in sales order.

Hi All,
We have a situation wherein the confirmed quantity is more than the ordered quantity.
a.) SO was created for qty1.Two schedule lines were proposed as stock was not available.
b.) When stock came in and most probablly, when the rescheduling job calling tcode V_V2 was run, both the schedule lines were confirmed.
c.) As a result, further processing is not done by system as confirmed quantity is more than ordered quantity.
Also we noticed that double schedule line was confirmed for a another order even without the rescheduling job is run.
Can you please suggest as to why this is scenario is occuring and how we can avoid the reoccurence? Thanks in advance!!
Regards,
Jeevan Penumatsa

Hi Jeevan Penumatsa
Welcome to SDN forum
Generally two schedule lines will take place if stock is not available in your plant or if open orders are there for that material also. So check the stock in MMBE
.If there are any backorders then it might be getting added in the created sales order and then you might be getting in two schedule lines
Regards
Srinath

In Funds Management-Assigned budget is more than the release

Hi Experts,
We have Funds Management active and in few cases the assigned budget is more than the released budget for a funds center and commitment item. We observed that the material consumption (stores requests) entries get posted even when there is no released budget.
Can you suggest ways to control the posing of material consumption entries when there is no released budget in Funds management.
With Regards
ACR.Ruben

hi
Try there is a USER _EXIT for Material consulmption for the Movement type 261 GI to Production .
Extension SAPLFMFA, component EXIT_SAPLFMFA_001
through this you can stop the Material consumption additions to fundcenter through the commit ment item.
Thanks & Regards
Mala K Reddy

F-28 partial incoming payment entered more than the net due

Dear Experts,
My users are entering the partial payments in F-28 transactions more than the net due. How can we avoid these in future.
And secondly how can we do the transactions where in the amount received is more than the net due.
with regards
Ramesh Y

Hello Ramesh,
If you receive more amount than net due, then you can post these amount with special gl indicator in transaction F-29 as a advance. So that this amount is being displayed separately in FBL5N.
Rgds
Murali. N

How to block invoice posting more than the GR quantity

Dear Experts,
While trying to do MIRO with more than the PO/GR quantity system is accepting both increase in qty and value with out any tolerance limit.
How to block, so that system should not allow to do MIRO more than the GR quantity.
Regards,
Alok

Hi,
System will by default block the payment, when it is not matching with the PO/GR value.
then you have to go transcation code MRBR - Release Blocked Invoices. so that you can make the payment for these invoices.
system will give you the message before saving, if you want an error message then go to oba5 tcode and change the message in to error, then if the Amount is not matching with the PO/GR value then the system will through error.
Regards,
Padma

Unable to do GR more than the process order quantity

When we try to do a GR against a process order (MIGO), and we use a quantity more than the process order, then the system is issuing an 'error' message.
Say process order is for 37000L, confirmation is done for 39000L (COR6): works
But when we try the MIGO or MB31, for the GR, then the system issues error as M7022: 'quantity exceeded by 2000L'.
Checked: 1) OMCQ and the message M7/ 022 is set as 'w', warning.
2) Also, the permissible batch size is 35000L - 39700L
Please advice.
Thnx!

Hi
you need to have an overdelivery tolerance (i.e 10%) in the process order header - goods receipt tab.
The tolerance should be maintained in the work scheduling view of the material. Then it is copied into the process order automatically.
BR
Eivind

Gross price of Service entry Sheet more than the value ordered in PO

Hi all!!
I have a PO that were created and changed by the following way:
The user created the PO of service with the quantity = 1 and the price = 50.000,00
Than he made the service entry sheet of this PO and MIRO normally.
As the fields on service tab wasn't blocked, the user changed the quantity to 105.000,00 and the price to 1.
After that, he made 3 services entry sheet to complete 105.000,00 quantities.
With this, the value delivered became bigger than the value ordered in the PO.
if I make a service entry sheet with a quantity of 200.000,00 for example, the message SE363 will be shown to me with a message that the "quantity entered exceeds quantity in purchase order".
I'd like to know if there's a way by customizing of control the price on Service entry sheet based on the value ordered in PO instead of quantity.
Can anybody help me?
Thanks in advance,
Cris

Hi Ajit and Rajesh
Thanks for the response.
The user made a PO with one line with quantity 1 and net price 50.000,00.
In the services tab, he put a sevice with quantitiy 1 and gross price 50.000,00, and than made the service sheet entry, and MIRO.
After this he changed in the services tab the quantity to 105.000,00 and the gross price to 1 (with the objective of making more than one service entry sheet by quantity).
With this, the system let the user make many entries of service allowing the user to make entries os sheet more than the net price that is in the line of PO.
I'd like to know if there's a way configure the system to make a compare between the gross price and the net price when i'm doing the service entry sheet, because now when I change a line of service tab, the system is not considering that other service entry sheet were made.
So that, i'm having the value of ordered bigger than the value delivered.
Nowadays, the block is made by quantity as I said, but i'd like to block by price too.
Sorry about the bad explanation before, I hope that now i explained better.
Thanks
Cris

Service entry sheet - GR quantity is more than confirmed quantity

We have a service based PO with Acct assignment F and Item category D.
We have ticked Goods receipt in delievery tab.
We have ticked 1) invoivce receipt and 2) GR-based IV. ( S-based IV is not ticked)
There is no purchase order history.
While making the service entry sheet and accpeting it , system is throwing an error log "GR quantity is more than confirmed quantity".
But we have not confirmed any quantity.
Please advise how to solve this error or what could be wrong in PO.
Thanks,
Manohar

Hi,
Go to ML81N, put the PO number and find out Is there any service entry sheet with No acceptance(Red Mark) is found there or not for that PO Line Item.
If yes, thenclick on that...go to change and delete that SES ......
Hope Clear U !
Regards,
Pardeep malik

Printing a component that is larger than the paper size

Hi,
I am trying to print a component that may be larger than the size of the paper being used. Is there some way to get it to split between pages - ie, if it's larger than the page, it is printed over two or more pages?
The component in question is a JTextArea. Would it be better to get the text from it and use the graphics drawString rather than the component's paint method?
The relevant part of the code is below.
Thanks,
Helen
     //cast the Graphics object to a Graphics2D object
     Graphics2D g2 = (Graphics2D) g;
     //set the origin to be (0,0)
     g2.translate(format.getImageableX(), format.getImageableY());
     //if double buffering is enabled, disable it before printing
     boolean b = testForDoubleBuffering(c);
     if (b == true){
     disableDoubleBuffering(c);
     //tell the Component to draw itself to the printer
     comp.paint(g2);
     //if double buffering was enabled, reenable it once printing has happened
     if (b == true){
     enableDoubleBuffering(c);
     //return this constant to tell the PrinterJob that the page has been printed
     return Printable.PAGE_EXISTS;

Hi,
I am trying to print a component that may be larger
than the size of the paper being used. Is there some
way to get it to split between pages - ie, if it's
larger than the page, it is printed over two or more
pages?
The component in question is a JTextArea. Would it be
better to get the text from it and use the graphics
drawString rather than the component's paint method?
The relevant part of the code is below.
Thanks,
Helen
     //cast the Graphics object to a Graphics2D object
     Graphics2D g2 = (Graphics2D) g;
     //set the origin to be (0,0)
g2.translate(format.getImageableX(),
format.getImageableY());
//if double buffering is enabled, disable it before
printing
     boolean b = testForDoubleBuffering(c);
     if (b == true){
     disableDoubleBuffering(c);
     //tell the Component to draw itself to the printer
     comp.paint(g2);
//if double buffering was enabled, reenable it once
printing has happened
     if (b == true){
     enableDoubleBuffering(c);
//return this constant to tell the PrinterJob that
the page has been printed
     return Printable.PAGE_EXISTS;I should add that this is part of a class that implements Printable. However, it is being called by a Book class with the Book's append() method. It is the Book class that is being printed by the PrintJob:
     Book book = new Book();
     book.append(new PrintableClass(c), format);
     //set the pageable class to be the book, with the user-selected format
     job.setPageable(book);
     //if the user clicks the print button, start the printing process, otherwise cancel the print
     if(job.printDialog()){
     try {
          job.print();
     } catch(PrinterException pe) {
          System.out.println("Error printing: " + pe);
Thanks,
Helen

Returns qty accepting more than the invoice qty

Hi Experts
When i am creating a sales order with reference to invoice the system is allowing to enter the quantity more than the invoiced quantity.
suppose the invoice quantity is 100 when i create a sales returns system is accepting to do returns for 150 also whichshould not be and also it is allowing to do so many times with the same reference document
i am getting just q warning message that for this invoice reference already returns exists if i bypass the warning message system is allowing to do next time also
how to do
any user exits to control which checks the VBRK number and VBRK billed quantity and it should less or equal to VBAK quantity
regards

Hi,
Yes, unfortunately SAP does allow it.
We are using FORM USEREXIT_MOVE_FIELD_TO_VBKD of MV45AFZZ to have our own validation for the same.
I hope this helps,
Regards
Raju Chitale.

In subcontracting the component quantity consumed more than the BOM quantit

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for