Inbound deliverey

Hi experts,
My client required whether the Inbound delivery and Gr made for that inbound number whether the invoice as raised to the customer.
Is there any tcodes are tables to find what are all the outbound number for a inbound delivery created.
regards
arun

You can get the outbound delivery no. for an inbound delivery if your inbound is created in reference to your outbound from the table VBFA. Give the inbound delivery no. in the succeeding doc field and execute you will get the outbound delivery in the preceding doc field.
Reward, if helpful
Noopur

Similar Messages

Creation of inbound delivery without reference to a PO

Dear gurus,
Let's say that a normal inbound flow is something like this:
PO > Create inbound delivery with reference to PO > inbound shipment > Transfer Order > Confirm Transfer Order > Post Goods Receipt > Putaway
Issue:
My client does not want to create the PO because the PO serves no purpose to them. They want the process to start from inbound delivery.
Question:
1. Can a standalone inbound delivery be created WITHOUT reference to a PO ? If yes, please tell me the configuration and transaction code involved in order to create this standalone inbound delivery.
2. Based on standard configuration, can an inbound delivery be created automatically with reference to a material document (for eg MIGO Mvt Type 501). Once again, for this scenario, no PO should be involved. If yes, please tell me the configuration and transaction code involved in order to trigger the creation of this inbound delivery (I'm not looking for the answer of an inbound delivery creation BAPI to being triggered directly after the creation of the Material Document).
3. Based on standard configuration, can an inbound delivery be created manually with reference to a material document (for eg MIGO Mvt Type 501). Once again, for this scenario, no PO should be involved. If yes, please tell me the configuration and transaction code involved in order to create this inbound delivery.
Thanks.

Hi Peter,
Actually, my intention is not really to create an inbound delivery based on a goods receipt. Since my client is not keen on the idea of creating a PO, I'm actually trying to provide alternatives and workarounds. From what I have gathered, I already know this much
-> An inbound delivery must be created with reference to PO unless Handling Unit Management is activated. If Handling Unit Management is activated, the creation of a Material Document will trigger the creation of an inbound delivery (I havent tested this out yet). Therefore, a PO will not be necessary in this case.
I was kind of expecting answers along this line, unless of course, something better pops up. Maybe someone out there may know something more.
As for Handling Units, I'm not familiar with it. Hopefully somebody can give me a good configuration guideline on what to do in order to activate it so that I can simulate the scenario of a Material Document triggering the creation of an inbound delivery (I'm not looking for the kind of answers which simply cuts and pastes the SAP HELP URL, 4.6C Handling Unit PDF, Best Practice Document and etc). Hopefully somebody out there can really give me a good guideline on how to do this.
Thanks..

Creation of Inbound delivery mandatory for ASN process in classic scenario?

Dear Experts,
We are going for classic scenario for our green field SRM implementation process. Our client is not using ASN process in their existing MM process. However, they are now looking for an oppurtunity to enable Suppliers to trigger ASN using SUS. In such case, is creation of inbound delivery from Buyer side a mandatory process?
Is the below the process correct?
PO -> ASN (Supplier using SUS) -> Inbound delivery (Optional) -> Goods Receipt (Mandatory) -> Invoicing.
Here, I understand that Goods receipt can be verified against the PO or via Inbound delivery to PO. ASN will inform the store keeper in advance about impending goods receipt and smoothen the confirmation process.
Could you please comment on the above process? Could you please suggest the best practices followed here?
Thanks and regards,
Ranjan
Ranjan Sutradhar

Hey Ranjan!,
You are on track.
The process flow you have shown is true. ASN is available as a standard as part of the MM-SUS process. It makes the buyer aware of any delays in delivery or to make arrangements on shipping docks to receive goods on a said date etc.
Regards,
Nikhil

Intrastat - Inbound/Outbound of non valuated materials used in production.

Hello everyone,
I've found several threads and very useful posts (ex: Re: PO Creation of free goods for intrastat reporting) regarding similar issue, but the solution proposed was manual input, therefore not answering totally to my client requirement.
I am actually performing maintenance activities and there is this new business process, I have been searching for the correct understandind of this process regarding intrastat here and I haven't found.
So i will describe the process hoping that someone can give me some hint:
Vendor A
Customer B
Raw Material R
Finish Product P
Service S
1. So we ( Vendor A ) receive raw material from our Customer B (+mov.type +)
2. We ( Vendor A ) with a production order process the Raw material R into Finish Product P.
3. We ( vendor A ) send the Finish Product P back to the Customer B.
4. We ( Vendor A ) then issue an invoice for the Service S to the Customer B.
5. It can occur that we Vendor A, can send back the Raw material R which was not manufactured back to Customer B (with a mov type.)
So thiswas the scenario and how the process is beeing done, and the client understanding is:
- As far as i understood, (please correct me if i am wrong) the Raw Material R must be declared (Quantity and statistic value) in Purchasing Intrastat, in the transactions where the Vendor A receives the raw material and as well in the case that they send it back to Customer B.
- Regarding the Invoice from the Vendor A to Customer B, the Raw Material R is incorporated in the Finish Product P, therefore I've been told that, the Statistic Value determined in the invoice in this situation has to include the cost value of the raw materials R.
My issues in MM are the following:
1 - If Raw Material R is non valuated, how can i maintain its statistic value to be declared, in inbound as well outbound? as an Info-record?
My issues in SD are the following:
1 - If the Statistic Value GRWR can be for example 102% calculated over the net value, and if the cost value of Raw Materials R are to be included, so i would have to add them somehow to the statistic value.
In this case the question comes up, where do i maintain the value of the raw materials R, and how to add it to the statistic value automatically ?
Regarding what is implemented in this client, they have SD intrastat running, but not MM intrastat was implemented.
Feedback would be highly appreciated!!
Thank you in advance.

Hi Sergio,
I have this exact same requirement but on a bigger scale.
The complexities are:
1. The raw material which client use, that can be either supplied by customer or can be procured by client. Remember, customer's raw material and my externally procured raw material is exactly same in all properties.
2. There are many customers who send same exact raw material.
Requirements:
1. Client wants to use same material codes (for raw materials and even for finished products) for normal production cycle and for Job work cycle. Master data needs to be the same, and data need to be separated at transaction level.
2. Whatever raw material client gets from customer, its statistical value should be entered at the time of goods receipt.
Please suggest if preference processing can handle this.
Thanks & Regards,
Vishal

ASN creation based on ECC inbound delivery

Hi All,
I have a scenario in which we are creating an inbound delivery in ECC and corresponding ASN should be created in supplier system.
In order to achieve this functionality of ECC to supplier system is there any way to map this functionality through any custom development ?
Kindly suggest
Thanks
Gaurav Gupta

Hi,
What I understand from the requirement is - The Supplier dispatches the material to Purchasing company & informs about the same via ASN. This ASN triggers inbound delivery in ECC. When the material reaches the Purchasing Company, GRN is posted with reference to the Inbound Delivery.
Is this correct?
If so, you can achieve this through RFC function, which can be called from vendor ERP system or through Vendor Portal by directly calling the RFC or by using Web Service.
Regards,
Prashant

Error in creation of inbound delivery

hi
When I tried to create inbound delivery against schedule agreement
1) Following warning message is coming when I enter the quantity for each and every line item
u201CAcknowledgment for PO item contains data varianceu201D
2)Following error message is coming when I saved the delivery
u201CTermination during purchase order updateu201D
So I am unable to create the inbound delivery
Note: this error is coming for a particular vendor only

Hi ,
Goto SM13 .
Find the terminations based on user and creation date.
Get the same analysed by ur ABAP team.
Also check the confirmations in PO at Item level.
Regards
Ramesh Ch

Inbound Delivery: Inbound WHSCON IDoc with Batch Split - HowTo...?

Hello
We have another tricky problem to solve on our ERP 6.0 system.
My colleagues of Lindt UK create manually inbound deliveries (VL33N) which are replicated to the warehouse (DESADV IDoc -> TRADACOMS.ORDHDR).
When the goods arrive at the warehouse they send back a good receipts message (TRADACOMS.DLCHDR -> WHSCON IDoc).
In some cases we have a batch split because the goods have been put into different storage locations. Example:
- item 10: 200 Cases of product 4711, batch 10-2011, in storage location '0001' (free available for Sale)
- item 10:     5 Cases of product 4711, batch 10-2011, in storage location '0004' (damaged)
I am aware that in the inbound WHSCON item 10 is a main position and the two actual batch split positions are sub-items (900001 & 900002 with HIPOS = '10'). I tried to used E1EDL19-QUALF = 'BAS' (= batch split) with the sub-items but failed so far to update the inbound delivery that I can see the batch split.
I have managed to get one sub-item but not 2 of them. Somehow the system aggregates the quantities for both sub-items into the single item that shows up in the inbound delivery.
When we send the inbound delivery to the warehouse the item looks like this:
- item 10: 200 Cases (no batch yet, Putaway quantity = 0, because these data are coming from the warehouse).
QUESTION: Has anybody else been faced with a similar (if not identical) problem and how did you solve it?
Thanks a lot in advance for your valuable input.
Regards
Uwe

Hello Finbarr
I assume that you do NOT send any (suggested) batches to your warehouse. Otherwise you would have the same problem like we have that the WHSCON cannot overwrite a (suggested) batch.
However, if you just send the quantity per item then the batch split is much simpler than you suggested:
"First E1EDL24 segment:
POSNR     50
MATNR     000000000000602006
MATWA     000000000000602006
CHARG     L1519   " <<< first batch
LFIMG     37.000
VRKME     CT
"Second E1EDL24 segment:
POSNR     50
MATNR     000000000000602006
MATWA     000000000000602006
CHARG     L1880   " <<< second batch
LFIMG     37.000
VRKME     CT
Well, and as qualifier we use: E1EDL19-QUALF = 'XYZ' " a dummy
The SAP system is smart enough the realize that these two E1EDL24 segment belong to the same item yet have different batches and, therefore, yield a batch split in the delivery. The system generated the 9xxxxx numbers for this sub-item lines automatically.
Although I believe that it is not possible to change a batch in the delivery using an inbound WHSCON I would appreciate to have a final proof of this assumption. I could imagine that if you first delete the item containing the suggested batch and then add a new item with the actual batch from the warehouse it might works. However, this would require to implement a user-exit which I do not prefer.
Regards
Uwe
PS: It seems I gave an answer to the wrong question (should be EDI (DESADV): Can batches be overwritten by an inbound WHSCON (pick conf)? )

Creation of Sales Order and Service Contract from Inbound IDOC

Hi Experts,
My requirement is to create a Sales Order as well as a Service Contract from one Inbound IDOC. I am getting the Inbound IDOC from a third Party. The message type is ORDERS and Basic Type is ORDERS02. How ever i am using an extension type IDOC which carries all the required data for Sales Order and Service Contract. My requirement is like, to create a Sales Order first.
I have created a Z FM which is attached to the Process Code and subsequently to the message type. Inside the FM i an calling FM 'IDOC_INPUT_ORDERS' for creation of Sales Order. After that i am changing the IDOC data for the Document Type. I am changing the document type which is responsible for Contract Creation.
Then I am again calling the FM 'IDOC_INPUT_ORDERS' for creation of Contract with the help of IDOC data. But here the Contract is not getting created. It's getting failed during the Batch input session.
I need to solve this problem as soon as possible. Please help me. If there are any other options also please share.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
Priyabrata

Actually there is problem with BDCDATA. Inside the FM it's calling transaction with help of BDCDATA. If i am creating a Sales order or contract alone its creating successfully. But when i am trying to create both, it's retuning sy-subrc '1001' after calling the transaction on the second attempt. Is there any problem with BDCDATA like we can't handle with less time gap? Please help and give your inputs.
Regards,
Priyabrata

Creation of Service Contract from Inbound IDOC

Hi Experts,
I am using Inbound IDOC type ORDERS02 with message type ORDERS for creation of Sales Order. Now my requirement is like to create a Service Contract from that Inbound IDOC. The IDOC type contains all the data require to create a Service Contract. The scenario is like, after creation of Sales Order it will check for the corresponding Service Contract exits or not by querying on a Z table which contains all those entries.
So my idea is to create a Z Program, in which it will check for the Service Contract and will create the same by reprocessing the same IDOC or by calling some Function Module. Please suggest how shall i proceed to create a Service Contract.
Is there any way to reprocess the IDOC or to collect the Data from the IDOC segments pass them to a FM which is responsible for creation of Inbound IDOC. Please suggest if this is feasible.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
Priyabrata.

Actually there is problem with BDCDATA. Inside the FM it's calling transaction with help of BDCDATA. If i am creating a Sales order or contract alone its creating successfully. But when i am trying to create both, it's retuning sy-subrc '1001' after calling the transaction on the second attempt. Is there any problem with BDCDATA like we can't handle with less time gap? Please help and give your inputs.
Regards,
Priyabrata

Inbound email update data in R/3 46C?

I know that Interactive Forms has the possibility of having an inbound email update data in R/3?
I also know that Interactive Forms is not possible with version 46C.
Can I get an inbound e-mail to update data in R/3 if I am on version 46C???
-Ken

Dear Relaxed Surfer,
The link you give is great to handle basis setup.
Is there a place to handle application setup? Suppose I want an inbound e-mail to execute a transaction, call a BAPI or simply do a direct update to a Zee table. Is there documentation on this?
-Ken

PI 7.11 sp6 - SOAP error on INBOUND SYNC (BE) interface - No handler ...

Experts,
We're running a AIX 6.1 unix based PI 7.11 system patched to Stack SP6. We've got one instance...no web dispatcher or load balancing of any kind.
Our proxy system (sender) is an ECC6.0 EHP4 system. Our 3rd party system (receiver) system is non-sap.
In about a 2 hour timespan, we processed 9700 XML messages all in the SOAP adapter. almost all our traffic is BE (sync). Of those messages, we got 11 errors. And here is what we see in XSMB_MONI and in the java default trace:
#2.0^H#2011 08 29 15:40:08:183#0-500#Error#com.sap.aii.adapter.xi.ms.XIEventHandler#
#BC-XI-CON-AFW#com.sap.aii.af.lib#327C4279AB0F2E5C000000010019C0BE#3930552000000004#sap.com/com.sap.aii.af.ms.app#com.sap.aii.adapter.xi.ms.XIEventHandler.onRequest(Services, TransportMessage)#PIISUSER#8
546##875E5AD3D27311E0C8580000003BF9B8#875e5ad3d27311e0c8580000003bf9b8#875e5ad3d27311e0c8580000003bf9b8#0#Thread[HTTP Worker [@2008983637],5,Dedicated_Application_Thread]#Plain##
Message 4e5b07b7-8180-00ab-e100-80000ae201a4(INBOUND): was not delivered due to com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception.MessagingException: SOAP: response message contains an error XIAdapter/PA
RSING/ADAPTER.SOAP_EXCEPTION - soap fault: Server was unable to process request. ---> No handler is registered for this service.#
#2.0^H#2011 08 29 15:40:08:081#0-500#Error#com.sap.engine.messaging.impl.spi.ServicesImpl#
#BC-XI-CON-MSG#com.sap.aii.af.ms.svc#327C4279AB0F2E98000000000019C0BE#3930552000000004##com.sap.engine.messaging.impl.spi.ServicesImpl.deliver(Message)#J2EE_GUEST#0##875E5AD3D27311E0C8580000003BF9B8#875e
5ad3d27311e0c8580000003bf9b8#875e5ad3d27311e0c8580000003bf9b8#0#MS Queue Worker [SOAP_http://sap.com/xi/XI/SystemRqst]#Plain##
Caught exception com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception.MessagingException from application code with msgKey: 4e5b07b7-8180-00ab-e100-80000ae201a4(INBOUND)#
So I've looked all over the marketplace and SDN/google. I could not find anyone else getting this type of error.
We have WILY introscope and all the diag tools. I am not seeing any bottlenecks on the threads for http or inbound/outbound queues.
I was hoping someone could point me in the right direction. I was thinking about bumping up all the default queue threads for the com.sap.aii.af.ms.svc service. It has the default "10" for all those.
We have done MAJOR tuning already on this instance. I think I've read all the notes/guides/HOW-TO...etc that there is for PI 7.11. So we are making progress.
Thanks,
NICK

Hi Nick,
From error message i could feel that, there is no problem from PI side and error is at the receiver system side where PI is posting the message. Why i am telling it's not PI issue and it's receiver's issue is that, error message you got is SOAP fault message. Fault message are raised by receiver system if any error occurs. If messgae is processed successfully then receiver system would send proper SOAP response message not a SOAP fault.
soap fault: Server was unable to process request. ---> No handler is registered for this service.#
So, in my view you better check at your receiver system (in your case it's no-sap sytem) why it's giving problem as 'No handler is register for the service'.
Rgards,
RK

NFe Inbound - Qual processo deveria ser usado com a CFOP 1.353 ?

Bom dia,
Estamos implementando em um cliente o SAP NFe inbound (3.10) e temos uma dúvida em relação com algums CFOPs.
Por exemplo: Qual seria o cenário correto para a CFOP 1.353 Aquisição de serv.transporte p/comercio Fil.adm ? Não tenho certeza se é possivel tratar este caso no SAP NFe Inbound.
NFe inbound business processes:
NF-e Process Normal Purchasing
Other Processes for NF-e
NF-e Stock Transfer Process
NFE Customer-Specific Business Process with DANFE
NF-e Subcontracting Process
NF-e Future Delivery Overview
NF-e Invoice Receipt Future Delivery Process
NF-e Consignment Overview
NF-e Invoice Consignment Process
Returnable Packaging for NF-e Processes
Muito obrigado por qualquer ajuda.
[]os,
Felipe

Bom dia Eduardo,
Que encrenca heim...rsss
Seguinte, no GRC pode ignorar esta nota, matar, o que quiser como você mesmo disse ela não deveria estar ali, e tentar fazê-la retornar ao ERP para pedir cancelamento só irá piorar as coisas.
Se entendi bem, é uma nota externa "registrada" no ERP, então está com o FORM vazio. Você terá que reverter os status manualmente no ERP, pegue uma nota "equivalente" e sincronize os status.
Para evitar nova transmissão de NF-es externas (sem formulário) aplique as SAP Notes 1396498, 1368159 e 1518476.
Atenciosamente, Fernando Da Rós
Ops, li novamente e acho que o erro foi ter registrado com a categoria com formulário, né? Isto também teria que ser revertido manualmente.
Edited by: Fernando Ros on Oct 28, 2010 12:18 PM

Processo Standard de Archiving para GRC NFe Inbound

Olá pessoal tudo bem?
    Mais uma vez gostaria de apoio para definir a melhor estratégia. Estou em um projeto de implementação do GRC NFe In com o SP16, o ambiente ainda não está pronto para customizações e testes porém algumas preocupações surgiram devido ao volume de XMLs recebidos. Dessa forma, gostaria de entender melhor a abrangência da solução Standard para archiving no GRC NFe in.
    Pelo que percebi, existem monitores específicos para administrar NFe e CTe arquivados (é necessario ativar o service na SICF)
NF-e Fiscal Workplace for Archived NF-es
CT-e Inbound Fiscal Workplace for Archived CT-es
    Porém tenho algumas dúvidas quanto ao funcionamento. Alguém já implementou essa funcionalidade, pode me ajudar a esclarecer o funcionamento?
a) Pelos monitores acima, é possível visualizar e realizar o download dos documentos arquivados? Isso é importante em caso de auditoria...
b) Hoje utilizamos o monitor "Download XML of NF-es / CT-es" para fazer download em massa de XMLs. Também será possível fazer o download em massa dos registros arquivados?
c) As rotinas de arquivamento são as mesmas utilizadas no ECC? (SARA. SARI e etc).
d) Existe alguma limitação para realizar download de documentos arquivados?
    Obrigado pela apoio....
Abraço
Edson

Bom dia Edson,
b) Sim ele também lê o archiving, inclusive se as estruturas do archiving não estiverem ativas ele fica dando uma mensagem para ativá-las (mesmo que não execute o archiving)
c) Sim. Entra na SARA e procura pelos objetos de achiving com a mascara /XNFE/*
d) A limitação é autorização e que o archiving esteja disponível para consulta.
Atenciosamente, Fernando Da Rós

NFe 3.10 Inbound - Dump na etapa Simular Invoice

Pessoal, boa tarde!
Estamos testando o processo de inbound (com automação) e depois de aplicar todas as notas para a versão 3.10 estamos com o seguinte erro no GRC ao executar o processo "Simular Invoice e NFe":
No ECC, ocorre o seguinte Short Dump:
Pesquisando no fórum, encontrei o mesmo erro do GRC, porém para outra função: GRC10 - Incoming NFe erro 00 341
No programa SAPLJ_1B_NFE_IN, include LJ_1B_NFE_INF3K a função e o parâmetro "IT_EXTENSION" existem e estão OK.
As SAP Notes 1752688, 1826868, 1857765 já estão aplicadas.
Alguém está com o mesmo problema?
Estou tentando fazer o debug desde o GRC mas ainda não consegui acertar o break-point. Onde exatamente devo colocar os breaks para conseguir debugar até chegar nessa função no ECC?
Obrigado!

Boa tarde Ricardo,
Se o seu processo for o simulação de compra normal, você pode colocar o break na função /XNFE/CALL_NFE_SIMULATION_NP caso contrário existe uma função para cada processo.
/XNFE/CALL_NFE_SIMULATION
/XNFE/CALL_NFE_SIMULATION_CSGR
/XNFE/CALL_NFE_SIMULATION_CSIV
/XNFE/CALL_NFE_SIMULATION_FDGR
/XNFE/CALL_NFE_SIMULATION_FDIV
/XNFE/CALL_NFE_SIMULATION_GR
/XNFE/CALL_NFE_SIMULATION_NP
/XNFE/CALL_NFE_SIMULATION_SA
/XNFE/CALL_NFE_SIMULATION_SC
Att, Cesar Coelho

GRC Inbound - setar step POASSIGN manualmente

Bom dia Pessoal,
Preciso de uma ajuda, alguém sabe se é possível setar o step POASSIGN do GRC Inbound para Definido como OK manualmente?
Pergunto isso porque a solução aqui do projeto é que alguns passos do processo que o GRC faz sejam feitos por um desenvolvimento ABAP no ECC,que irá gerar uma série de workflows para áreas responsáveis em caso de erro..
Exatamente isso:
Para compras normais:
1.SIGNATUR (Auto)
Checagem da assinatura (EXECUTADO PELO GRC)
2.AUTHORIZ (Auto)
Checagem da autorização na SEFAZ (EXECUTADO PELO GRC)
3.NPURVALD (Auto)
Validação de processo normal (EXECUTADO PELO GRC)
4.POASSIGN (Auto) (NESSE MOMENTO HÁ INTEGRAÇÃO ENTRE GRCxECC PARA QUE O STEP SEJA EXECUTADO PELO DESENVOLVIMENTO ABAP NO ECC)
Associação do pedido ao XML
5.NFESIMUL (TAMBÉM EXECUTADO PELO DESENVOLVIMENTO ABAP NO ECC)
Simulação da nota
6.DELCREAT (Auto) (TAMBÉM EXECUTADO PELO DESENVOLVIMENTO ABAP NO ECC E APÓS OK, RETORNA UM STATUS AO GRC QUE OS 3 PASSOS FORAM EXECUTADOS COM SUCESSO, NESSE MOMENTO OS 3 PASSOS POASSIGN, NFESIMUL E DELCREAT DEVEM SER SETADOS OK MANUALMENTE NO GRC PARA DAR SEGUIMENTO NO PROCESSO, PORÉM LOGO NO PRIMEIRO PASSO POASSIGN JA NÃO FOI POSSIVEL SETA-LO, APARENTEMENTE ELE OBRIGA QUE ENTRE COM UM NR. DE PEDIDO PARA A ATRIBUIÇÃO, É ISSO MESMO?)
Pensei em usar o processo flexível FLEXPR01, porém afetaria os passos do monitor logístico que estão contemplados no processo normal,(GRCONFQU,.GRFICHCK e GRMMCHCK)
Há alguma outra saída?
Obrigado pela ajuda,
DANIEL

Olá Eduardo,
Desculpe pela demora em dar um feedback.
Atualizando a questão, acabamos por adotar o processo Flexível mesmo, deixando a parte de verificações de quantidade a cargo do sistema ABAP aqui da integração.
Respondendo suas perguntas
porque destes desenvolvimentos?
O cliente decidiu adquirir uma ferramenta desenvolvida em ABAP que irá controlar os passos que citei e gerar Workflows para as áreas responsáveis em caso de erros, esse seria o motivo principal dessa solução.
O que vocês irão fazer? Como irão fazer?
Iremos utilizar como ponto da integração as BADIs flexíveis, método before_danfe para o momento de atrib. de pedido até a geração da inbound delivery. e método after_danfe após a entrada da chave de acesso até a geração da MIRO
Obrigado pela ajuda,
Daniel

Inbound deliverey

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for