Inbound delivery qty cannot be less than previously GR-posted qty

Kindly suggest what could be the reason for appearing the subject line error message while doing GR-MIGO w.r.t inbound delivery.
Regards

we have not created any TO,we are using shipment snd shipment cost document processing......w.r.t inbound delivery.
then we are doing GR w.r.t inbound delivery using migo, but for information to all VL32N is also throwing errosr message.
scenario PO qty 200 TS(thousand)
Inbound qty        200 TS
1st GR done        96 TS
Now while doing second time GR w.r.t same inbound for the remaining qty i.e. 104 TS the system throwing message VLA-320,desc is written over the subject line.
material SKU is EA and order unit TS, conversion maintained 1 TS = 1000 EA.
why promting that message when there are open qty of 104 TS yet to GR.

Similar Messages

  • Return delivery qty greater than previously GR-posted qty

    Dear Team,
    We have created GRN with reference to inbound delivery and this is posted to quality stock.
    When we try to cancel this GRN document, system is giving the error "Return delivery qty greater than previously GR-posted qty xxxxxxx (IBD No) VLA 319"
    How to cancel this GRN.
    Thanks & Regards,
    R.Saravanan

    You can find information on the implementation of this error message (VLA319) in OSS note 1050944.
    As for the error your're facing maybe can be solved via the implementation of OSS note 1342935.
    Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Nov 2, 2010 8:49 AM

  • GRN Qty should be less than Sub contracting Challan Qty

    Hi Friends,
    When we put Sub Contract Challn at the time of receving Sub Contract material MIGO, system should pick up challn Quty, or System should accept less qty than Challan Qty.
    Can we do the same ?
    Please help me.
    Thanks in Advance
    Yogesh

    HI,
    Yes GRN Qty should be same or less  than Sub contracting Challan Qty, system will allow you do the reconcilation with J1ifq or if the challan qty less then GRN quantity at the time system wont allow you to do the reconcilation
    Regards
    Pramod

  • Excise invoice quantity cannot be less than the quantity received

    Hi,
    I have done MIGO with part 1 entry but while doing J1IEX, I am getting an error message 4F109 : Excise invoice quantity cannot be less than the quantity received.
    Please note that we have done MIGO with 5000 qty. and doing J1IEX with short 3000 qty.
    Regards.

    Hi,
    For this case of "Part I" selected during GR, you need to create Excise invoice thro J1IEX ->  Capture Excise Invoice -> Good receipt (use the material document number), which will complete the part II posting. Then you can proceed with MIRO.
    With regards,
    Jeeva.

  • Java.sql.SQLException: Invalid precision value. Cannot be less than zero

    Hi,
    In my portlet application have several jsf tables which bind to several oracle tables. I have tested the portlet in pluto and tried to deploy it on liferay. However, I get an exception stating:
    java.sql.SQLException: Invalid precision value. Cann
    ot be less than zero
    What could this exception mean? Has anyone else encountered this?
    Marc
    P.S. The trace is shown below:
    Feb 6, 2007 12:34:56 AM org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationDispatcher invoke
    SEVERE: Servlet.service() for servlet jsp threw exception
    java.lang.RuntimeException: java.sql.SQLException: Invalid precision value. Cann
    ot be less than zero
    at com.sun.data.provider.impl.CachedRowSetDataProvider.setCursorRow(Cach
    edRowSetDataProvider.java:343)
    at com.sun.data.provider.impl.CachedRowSetDataProvider.setCursorIndex(Ca
    chedRowSetDataProvider.java:300)
    at com.sun.data.provider.impl.CachedRowSetDataProvider.getRowCount(Cache
    dRowSetDataProvider.java:624)
    at com.sun.rave.web.ui.component.TableRowGroup.getRowKeys(TableRowGroup.
    java:806)
    at com.sun.rave.web.ui.component.TableRowGroup.getFilteredRowKeys(TableR
    owGroup.java:429)
    at com.sun.rave.web.ui.component.TableRowGroup.getRowCount(TableRowGroup
    .java:749)
    at com.sun.rave.web.ui.component.Table.getRowCount(Table.java:307)
    at com.sun.rave.web.ui.renderer.TableRenderer.renderTitle(TableRenderer.
    java:400)
    at com.sun.rave.web.ui.renderer.TableRenderer.encodeBegin(TableRenderer.
    java:123)
    at javax.faces.component.UIComponentBase.encodeBegin(UIComponentBase.jav
    a:683)

    I've dug deeper into this problem and am able reproduce the error in the Pluto server. To reproduce this error, I modified my Oracle jdbc driver from the JSC embedded driver (smoracle.jar) to the Oracle native driver (ojdbc14.jar). Now, I am getting the exception in my Sun Application Server:
    What is the difference between ojdbc14.jar and smoracle.jar that could cause this problem? What can I do so that I can fix this problem for ojdbc14.jar?
    Thanks,
    Marc
    P.S.
    The problem is with the clob column (DOR_NOTE_TX). The stack trace is:
    [#|2007-02-06T09:00:53.663-0800|INFO|sun-appserver-pe8.2|javax.enterprise.system.stream.out|_ThreadID=16;|
    Reader executing query ps=0 SELECT DOR_NOTE_DT, DOR_NOTE_TX FROM DOR.DOR_NOTE_DATA WHERE DOR_NOTE_CD='SECURITY' AND TO_CHAR(DOR_Note_Dt, 'mm/dd/yyyy') = '02/05/2007'
    No Params|#]
    [#|2007-02-06T09:00:53.679-0800|WARNING|sun-appserver-pe8.2|javax.enterprise.system.stream.err|_ThreadID=16;|
    java.sql.SQLException: Invalid precision value. Cannot be less than zero
    Message was edited by:
    marcnikko

  • Umbraco CMS - startindex cannot be less than zero error is showing instead of 404 error page

    I am running into an issue with an Umbraco website.
    If I miskey the URL on a top level page, e.g. mysite.com/wrongpage I get an asp error.
    If I miskey it on a subpage, even if the top level page is incorrect too, I get my correct 404 error e.g. mysite.com/wrongpage/wrongpage2
    At this point I'm trying to find out whether it's a bug in Umbraco 4.11.10 or if this error is caused by something obvious. I'm completely stuck and not particularly technical (I'm not a developer).
    If anyone could help explain what this error means, and/or if there's any way to correct or bypass it I would really appreciate the help.
    The full contents of the error are: 
    Server Error in '/' Application.
    StartIndex cannot be less than zero.
    Parameter name: startIndex
    Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code. 
    Exception Details: System.ArgumentOutOfRangeException: StartIndex cannot be less than zero.
    Parameter name: startIndex
    Source Error: 
    An unhandled exception was generated during the execution of the current web request. Information regarding the origin and location of the exception can be identified using the exception stack trace below.
    Stack Trace: 
    [ArgumentOutOfRangeException: StartIndex cannot be less than zero.
    Parameter name: startIndex]
    System.String.InternalSubStringWithChecks(Int32 startIndex, Int32 length, Boolean fAlwaysCopy) +10698829
    System.String.Substring(Int32 startIndex) +12
    AutoFolders.NotFoundHandler.Execute(String url) +538
    Umbraco.Web.Routing.LookupByNotFoundHandlers.HandlePageNotFound(PublishedContentRequest docRequest) +1148
    Umbraco.Web.Routing.LookupByNotFoundHandlers.TrySetDocument(PublishedContentRequest docRequest) +10
    Umbraco.Web.Routing.PublishedContentRequestBuilder.<LookupDocument1>b__1e(IPublishedContentLookup lookup) +15
    System.Linq.Enumerable.Any(IEnumerable`1 source, Func`2 predicate) +146
    Umbraco.Web.Routing.PublishedContentRequestBuilder.LookupDocument1() +198
    Umbraco.Web.Routing.PublishedContentRequestBuilder.LookupDocument() +195
    Umbraco.Web.Routing.PublishedContentRequest.ProcessRequest(HttpContextBase httpContext, UmbracoContext umbracoContext, Action`1 onSuccess) +139
    Umbraco.Web.UmbracoModule.ProcessRequest(HttpContextBase httpContext) +339
    Umbraco.Web.UmbracoModule.<Init>b__7(Object sender, EventArgs e) +80
    System.Web.SyncEventExecutionStep.System.Web.HttpApplication.IExecutionStep.Execute() +136
    System.Web.HttpApplication.ExecuteStep(IExecutionStep step, Boolean& completedSynchronously) +69

    Hi Aaronb9,
    Since the issue regards ASP.NET and website deployment. I suggestion you post the question in the ASP.NET forums at
    http://forums.asp.net/. It is appropriate and more experts will assist you.
    We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
    Click
    HERE to participate the survey.

  • How to export all Artboards for different mobile resolutions? e.g. My artboards are 1080 x 1920 px, I want them all to 216 x 384px... ( I m using export .png by adjust ppi, but cannot set less than 72ppi)

    e.g. My artboards are 1080 x 1920 px, I want them all to 216 x 384px...
    ( I am using export .png by adjust ppi, but cannot set less than 72ppi)

    Sorry to hear that. There is an enhanced version on Adobe Exchange that may be more "bug free".
    https://creative.adobe.com/addons/products/2955#.VNQ6Asbdkqg
    You might want to test is on a smaller file and see if it will export the PNGs at the proper resolution. My quick test showed that it did.
    You can delete the "Layer" export and get JUST the Artboards by choosing "Export Layers>None". You may have already tried that.
    You might also break your file into 2 or more files and see if it works with fewer artboards.
    I have had good success with the free version. Perhaps the paid version will solve the issue.

  • Posting change quantity less than quantity already posted

    Hello,
    Our customer have a problem on Live system. On transaction LU04 have a
    posting change notice impossible to display, because system provide the
    message number L2 145 'Posting change quantity less than quantity
    already posted'. The Posting Change Number XXXXXX and the
    transfer order is XXXX Is there any way to cancel this TO??It is impossible to do something with that.
    The history is: 321 movement from quality for 5040 un. 3 TO, 2 with 2160 are fine, and the 3rd to sap have generated 2160 un instead of 720 pending.
    Any one had this problem in the past?We are forbidden to change status for PCN from 'T' to 'U'.
    Thanks

    Hi,
    I think you have posted the question in the wrong forum. This is MDM forum.
    Thanks and Regards
    Nitin Jain

  • GR qty showing less than production order confirmation qty

    Hello Experts,
    Greetings.
    My issue is while doing production order confirmation(CO12),for some materials it shows less GR quantity than the confirmation qty.I m wondering how it can be possible?
    What could be the problem?
    Plz advice.
    Thanks
    Nitin

    Confirmed qty of each operation and delivery qty at the header are two different fields.   Confirmed qty will be the same with the yield to conf. during confirmation.  Whereas, the GR qty is equal to the total sum of quantity received from the order. 
    Check whether during confirmation you create auto GR or not.  If yes, then check the COGI t-code.  There might be some error log of goods receipt in there.  If no, then check GR qty in document goods movement compared to confirmed qty during confirmation.
    Hope it helps.

  • ERROR: PGI in delivery with picked quantity less than delivery quantity

    Hi Friends!
    I need your help, i have the following situation:
    Outbound Delivery with batch position:
    90001  Mat DD3450 Picked Delivery Quantity=98 and Picked quantity=84
    Overall Pick Status = "B"
    Overall WM Status = "C"
    The outbound delivery was posted completely and the following documents was generated:
    WMS transfer order:  With 84 UN in quantity
    Material document:  With 98 UN in quantity
    Invoice: With 98 UN billed
    The question is how was posible to generated the PGI for the outbound delivery when the picked quantity was less than delivery quantity? is a SAP program error?
    Thanks
    Best regards
    Enrique

    benito,
    Check your Picking Confirmation config. as you are using WM/Lean WM, then your Shipping Point should have a mandatory requirement to confirm all TO's. The confirmation should update the Picking Status and the Overall GI Status to 'C' (with any relevant changes to the picked qty). Give that a go.
    Cheers,
    Paul...

  • Inbound Delivery via Idoc with more than 1 line fails

    Hi @ all,
    i try to replicate inbound deliveries from an external system to SAP EWM using Idocs (SHP_IBDLV_SAVE_REPLICA02 with MessageType SHP_IBDLV_SAVE_REPLICA).
    If there's only one position in inbound delivery it works, but if i try with two or more lines processing ends up with idoc-status 51 (WE02) and message 'Error inserting partner and location data at item level'  (SLG1).
    Any ideas to solve this problem?
    kind regards

    Hello Markus,
    "i try to replicate inbound deliveries from an external system to SAP EWM using Idocs".
    you are trying to send the information from non sap system?. Can you elaborate the scenario.
    Is the case you are sending ASN information directly to eWM system.
    Seems the process is more interesting. Can you please share details.
    regards
    Sastry

  • MIRO posting date less than MIGO / SES posting date

    Hi,
    In our system , user can make MIRO with respect to a PO and give posting date less than posting date of GRN or Service entry sheet. I want that user can give posting date of MIRO document equal to or greater than posting date of GRN / SES of that PO.  How can i do this?
    Regards
    Kalpesh

    Hi,
    Please write a validation in order to avoid the user keying in the pre posting date at the time of MIRO

  • Less than 2 months post bk, scores soar!

    Scores after bk were around 490ish and less than 2 months later, my experian fico is 627! Equifax and transunion are 534 and 518. I applied for two capital one cards and since leaving a small balance on both, my scores raised significantly. I am excited! Ill be at 700 within the 2 year timeline for sure !!

    Kookoos wrote:
    Absolutely start rebuilding your credit the day of your discharge.( provided your trustee has not put any limits on you.... It can void your bankruptcy.) Ask you attorney. I cried my self to sleep thinking about filing..then I cried my self to sleep asking why I didn't do it earlier.
    Credit on Sept 2013 the day of discharge.
    Eq 589 / TU 569 / Ex 585
    Today
    EQ 761 / TU 756 / Ex 752
    Be smart.. Never carry a balance of $0.
    If your card closes on the 18th. It will be due on the 12th. It reports on the 7th then you pay on the 8th. This way you carry a "reporting" balance but still never pay interest. I always report 7% balance. Nothing more. Nothing less!!!!! It is a pain but it has worked for me. I hope this helps someone. BK is absolutely frightening. Im 6'3" 235lbs. It brought me to my knees!!! But there is hope. Hang in there!!! Just remember this one thing. Your Fico is a credit score..not a debt score.. If you don't show how you manage credit your score will see very little movement. USE your cards and let it show. $0 reported balance means 0 activity to the computing formula. Good luck. YOU CAN DO THIS!!!This, by far, has to be the best and still a little hard, tip to date for repairing credit! Thank you! I am trying to get all of my due dates the same or very close together. In the interim, I am using this method of using maybe 3 cards, then rotating. 

  • Inbound Delivery from PGI

    Hi SAP Gurus,
    We are using two step STO process. I want to make Inbound delivery at the recieving plant from the Outbound delivery at the Issuing plant after PGI is done. What I understand is that we need to have ASN implemented to do so. Is there any other way available in standard SAP to do so?
    Please tell.
    Thanks
    Manav

    ASN implemented means you need to have Order Acknowledgment from the Vendor which we are not using in our system. This is IS Retail system and we are using STO between DC and Stores. The problem we are facing is when DC issues less material than what is in STO, Inbound delivery does not get updated for the same qty at Store. So the person who is recieving material expects qty mentioned in Inbound delivery but physically recieves less. So that creates problem as he tries to do GR of more material but systme does not let him do because of less qty in PGI. So now I want that system should create Inbound delivery from PGI/Outbound delivery instead of creating from STO. In this case it will be able to pull the exact qty of the material expected for GR in store.
    So I want to know how to do this.

  • Error when creating inbound delivery - insufficient quantity

    Hello all,
    after creating a purchasing scheduling agreement (ME31L), I want to create an inbound delivery (VL31N).
    But when saving the inbound delivery, I get the following error message:
    Insuff stk qty (       0.000) for line item000001
    The stock for the material on the scheduling agreement is empty. But why does it not let me do an inbound delivery?
    Thanks
    Anne

    In the config of  Define Internal Confirmation Categories 
    is
    2 shipping notification is assign to 10 or LA if it LA than it will allow you to create the inbound delivery
    The delivery is created in my system
    i got message
    Notified quantity exceeds quantity still to be notified 15.000- CS   Message no. ME160                                               
    but it is warning not error.

Maybe you are looking for