Incomplete Process order settlement at Month end.

We have issue with order settlement during the month end. We have process orders that run over the week (thus will run over the month-end), with REL, PCNF, and PDLV status at the month end. Production does not want to close/ TECO those orders, as we are not yet done. But FI wants to settle them for the month end.
1) Can FI settle those REL work orders, as mentioned before?
This is what I found:
2) The standard practice is TECO, is to set before closing the order.
3) You can only perform (business) closing for a process order if (CLSD):
The order has status Released (REL), Control recipe created (CRCR) or Control recipe discarded (CRAB), or Technically completed (TECO). To have status Technically completed, the order must have already reached status Released.
The order balance is 0.
There are no more open purchase requisitions, orders, or commitments for it.
All data related to the process order is available and correct (For example, the inspection lots for the order must be completed).
There are no future change records from the confirmation processes
2) So, if statement 1) is correct, is this correct lifeycle:
A.     Settlement at month end for all orders with REL status.
B.      TECO after settlement, and also after DLV and CNF status.
C.      Close after TECO.
Upload in your comments, if there is any link.
Thanks, points will be rewarded.

Hi Abi,
Since the Process order is in uncompleted stage and partially delivered to stock, still it has WIP to be delivered to stock.
Calculate the WIP value & settle the order in Month end.
Prerequisite for WIP calculation is order should has REL status.
In month end for Uncompleted order , calculate WIP value & settle the Order.
General steps for month end practice:
Over head calculation
WIP calculation
Variance calculation - Once the Order receives - DLV /TECO status.
Order settlement.
Order closing
Regards
Pradeep

Similar Messages

CO-Production Order Settlement at Month End

Hi Expert
We are using CO- Production Orders for making sample materials; the problem is that at month end when I run the settlement with CO88 at plant level system settled my CO-PO orders including release status orders. I want to settle only those orders whose status is TECO Technically Completed.
Can any body have an idea that why system settled my Release CO-PO order, I donu2019t want these orders to be settled in month end?
Thanks in Advance
Regards
Ashfaq

Hi Ashfaq
System is correct in doing this... All orders Including REL & over and above status REL would settle
If you wanna ignore them, then best option is to
a. Check the Order status from Table JEST
b. Settle them from KO88 using an LSMW
You can also use Program SE38-RKO7CO88.. This provides you multiple selection options... Ask your ABAP consultant to
a. Create a Z T code using RKO7...
b. create a SEARCH HELP so that you can select orders based on STATUS in RKO7CO88
br, Ajay M

PROCESS ORDER SETTLEMENT - KO88

Hi!
As per my knowledge KO88 will be done for OHDS and for Material. OHDS settlement will be done in month ending which results the difference between KSII and KP26.
Can anybody explain how the accounting entry will be generated at the time of Process order settlement of material i.e. KO88.
Sreenivas

Hi
Settlement entries are same as in production order. No diff
However, u must be aware settlement entries are dependent on status of process order. If status is DLV or TECO wip is calcelled and variances are calculated. If status if PREL or REL or PDLV wip entries are posted.
Hope you have made settings in WIP for offsetting entries
Pls assign points if this clarifies else send query with more explanation

Process order settlement

Hi,
when i do process order settlement , system gives error message that "maintain the settlement rule of the sender".
Process order contains two co-product and i have given details in "joint production" in MRP II tab.
When i checked order settlement rule in COR2 i couldn't find anything and when i try to insert new settlement rule system gives error message .
Sunoj

error message when executing KKS2
KV 206 1 OIT 20000095/1 No suitable settlement rule found for object OP0000200000950001 Checking and processing orders

Error during Process order settlement

Hi Gurus,
i am facing problem during the process order settlement. an error is occured is as follows: Tax code V0 country IN does not exist in procedure ZTAXIN.
actually this V0 tax code is assing to the ZTAXIN procedure & which is also assign to country. i couldn't get why it ask tax code during the settlement.
In Process order Itemization i find the 2 GL ( Element) in which there is one consumption GL & second is COFG sold GL. from GL Master i remove both GL Tax category & also remove the click from posting without tax allowed. till i am facing this problem?
Please help me to overcome this issue.
Point will be rewarded if question solved.
Than'x
Dhananjay R

hi gopan,
Than'x for attention on my question. till my problem is not solved. during the process order why it hit the tax code? would u please guide me how to find the tax code assignment which hit during the process order settlement?
i have check all the Tax related setting till this issue not solved. ( Check calculation procedure (OBYG), Tax code assignment (FTXP), also check the Tax Account Integration (OB40).
also i remove tax related assignment from the GL master related to specific gl which are display in component structure.
pls help me to solve this issue..
Than'x
Dhananjay

Process order settlement to cost center

Hi,
We have a requirement to settle only the quantity to material and the costs to
cost center from the process orders. This is to ensure the materials are
handled as non-valuated and the COGM is computed from the goods consumption
postings.
The process orders will have both co products and by products as well.
There is also one more requirement to allow Purchase orders against the non-
valuated materials.
I am planning to propose the following :-
1) To make the materials valuated but set the standard price to zero to give
the effect of non-valuated materials and at the same time can also raise
purchase orders because otherwise non-valuated materials cannot be used to
raise Purchase orders.
2) When goods receipt happens from the process order the actual costs of the
process order will remain as it is in the process order since the standard
price of the FG is zero and only the quantity will be received into inventory.
3) When process order settlement happens the full actual costs will be settled
to a price difference account and cost center tied to the price difference
account.
Do you guys see any flaws in the above design?
Edited by: FICO Consultant on Feb 21, 2012 4:28 AM

Answered

Process Order Settlement Rule by Order Type

Hi Experts
Our Client a requirement to have Process Order Settlement by Order Type please let me know how it can be achieved
In SAP a Process Order Variance is settled via the following Combination in OBYC :-
1 Chart of Accounts
2 Transaction PRD
3 Valuation Modifier
4 General Modifier
5 Valuation Class
6 GL Account
Can this account assignment based on the Order Type ?
Thanks
Suman

Dear Suman,
Normally, Order Types serves a different purpose. We can maintain default settlement rule, Costing Variants, Settlement Profiles, Number ranges etc at Order Type Level.
It is not possible to directly manage the Order Types in the Account Assignment in OBYC.
Thanks & Kind Regards
Umapathi G

How to review all process order for a month.

Hi,
I need advice to review all process order in a month in order to ensure Actual quantity usage for product (BOM) is correct without missing the quantity?
Thank you.
Br. Hadi

Hi Hadi,
Use report COOISPI with list as Components and input as process order numbers. In the output layout you can see the Requirement qty field which is qty as per process order BOM and Qty withdrawn which is the actual issue qty. From the layout you also select Pegged requirement field which display the components parent material.
You also check MB24 - Reservation List against the process order number which also display the required qty, issued qty and difference.
Thanks & Regards,
Ramagiri

Any T.code to view Incomplete process order

Dear Experts,
Is there any standard report or T.code to see Incomplete Process order?
Thanks & Regards,
Olet Malla

dear olet,
please elabprate ur question, which process u are concerned.?
do u want to see pending PO, open PO or smth else.
try me2m.
thanks
nisha

Settlement for month-end closing, individual production or sales order

Dear SAP Experts,
Our style is MTO.
In month-end closing, we follow to make a settlement for production orders:
1. CO43   -- Actual overhead calculation (collective processing)
2. KSU5   -- Actual allocations Assessment
3. KSII     -- Actual Price Calculation
4. CON2 -- Revaluation at actual prices (collective processing)
5. KKAO -- WIP calculation (collective processing)
6. CO88 -- Production order settlement (collective processing)
Question:
1. What kind accounts will be effected after above each step?
2. does individual production settlement need step 1-4 in above?
    1. KKAX (Work in Process)
    2. KO88 (Settlement)
    Is those enough?
3. What kind account will be effected after va44 processing?
Any tips will be welcome.
Zhou Zhen

Hi,
The value flow completely different for each of the MTO Scenario.
I need to know what kind of MTO scenario you have.
is it MTO - Valuated Sale Order without Sale Order Controlling
Is it MTO - Valuated Sale Order with Sale Order Controling
is it MTO- Non-valuated Sale Order (Sale Order controlling is mandatory)
based on this the value flows and the transaction that need to be executed will differ.
The way you explained i presume that it could be any of the first two scenarios.
in such case, the value flows are as good as make to stock scenario. Only in the third scenario, the value flow completely changes
For 1. What kind accounts will be effected after above each step?
all the accounts relevant for Make to Stock will get affected. But the the scenario is MTO - Valuated Sale Order with Sale Order Controling, the the variances from production order is settled to Sale order instead of settling to COPA.
For 2. does individual production settlement need step 1-4 in above?
All the steps from 1 to 6 are necessary for any of the above 3 scenarios
For 3. What kind account will be effected after va44 processing?
This is for calculating the overheads on the sale order. in this case, the sale order is a controlling object. once this t.code is executed, you can see the oh being calculated on the sale order
Hope this will give some good isight in to various MTO scenarios
Best Regards
Surya

Process order settlement configuration

Dear experts,
I'm trying to run the end month process to settle and properly take the costs to the materials as per confirmed trough activity types with price mantained, but really dont know the exact process to follow, can anyone please explan this process and the config needed, does this has something to do with CO88 or KO88
I see some config trough transactions OKG1 to OKG8 is this config mandatory? or what config needs to be done
When I run KO88 for an order that is confirmed and delivered and status TECO i get this message "There are no accrued amounts; settlement is not possible"
Your help here will be highly appreciated
Thanks in advance

Hi
It seems RA Key is specified in your Prod order.. But you have not calculated WIP and tried to settle directly.. thats why you got this message...
IMG > Controllin > Prod Cost Cont > Cost Obj Con > Prod cost by order > Period end > WIP / Variance....
you need to do settings in the nodes here... I suggest refer Building block library.... Type " SAP Building block library" in google and refer the BB Library for CO-Product Costing
br, Ajay M

Process Order Settlement without GR or GI

Hello,
I have a quick question that I need help with please. A process order has no Goods Receipt yet (only consumption) as of month-end when we settle all orders. Will such an order settle and post an entry to GL even though it is not completed yet?
Also, if an order has Goods Receipt but no consumption (I know it doesnt make sense, but it is an error order), will it still settle?
Thanks,
Gligor.

Hi,
If I understood correctly, you have consumptions of RM from your inventory but you dont have production GR. You wanted to do the order settlement.
- Why do you want to settle order that is not completed in production? If there are any expenses on the order during the month, shouldn't these expenses be tracked as WIP?
- Also, for the case where there are GR without GI, are there any activity consumptions on the process order?
Thanks,
Ram

Process order settlements not flowing into BI for Inventory

Hi,
I built a cube for inventory based on the standard extractors to generate MAC values. I have three MAC reports, each for daily, weekly and monthly. The reports give the right values at the at the month level , but whenever there is a settlement for process order done, BI does not pick the settlement value and this makes the MAC value shoot up at the daily and weekly level. I tried to a find an extractor for this settlement and could not find any. Can someone please help me with this ? Is there any datasource for settlement of process order?
Thanks

Hi,
Both Tomas and Debraj have provided good tips. Let me elaborate on this.
From SWU3, access Maintain Runtime Environment -> Schedule Background Job for Missed Deadlines by double clicking on it and execute it. You could maintain the interval until next deadline check. You could keep the number low.
Also, if you have the event queue turned on, some times the work items will stuck in the queues and took a long time for them to be available.
Best Regards,
Jennifer Cha
GRC RIG

Problem with process order settlement

Hi,
I'm having a problem while doing settlment for process orders. I have two types of process orders AJWV and AJW0; AJWV works for center 2000 and AJW0 works for center 1000. When I calculate variances both work good. The problem comes when I try to settle them. For AJWV orders there are three finance documents generated, FI document, Controlling document and Profit Center document. But for AJW0 it's just generated Controlling document and Profit Center document.
Both order types have the same settlement profile assinged
The settlement rule for both orders is to Cost Center, full settlement 100%
Both orders are produced for Sales order with valuated stock
I already checked the account assigment for the materials corresponding to each order, and both account determination are ok.
What can be the problem so the AJW0 is not posting to FI variances?
Thanks

Hi,
Yes for AJWV the FI entry was generated.

How to see Process Order settlement details?

Dear Experts,
How do I view the accounting/controlling details after a Process Order Settlemnet is carried out?
In OBYC, what is the posting transaction for Order Settlement through which I can see the valuation class & G/L account assigned?

Hi,
IF you wish to check the Accouting documents or settlement documents , you can check throw CO88 select Previous Settlement to check the detaiils or else you can go to KOB1 Order line item display for checking all the line items.
in KOB1 T.code you can check all the documents including Material and other by double clicking the items.
Hope this will Help you ..
Thanks
Goutam

Incomplete Process order settlement at Month end.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for