Incompletion log Profitability Segment at item level in the Sales Order

Hello Sapians,
We recently activated the "Sales Order value flow to COPA". When we create the Sales Orders the Profitability segment for the item is getting picked up automatically and have no issue in saving the Sales Order.
But when we edit the Sales Order and then try to save it, Sales Order has incompletion log which is leading to Profitability segment in the item level.
When I click the little box in Sales Order Item > Account Assignment tab> Profitability Segment forward arrow--> "continue" or "derivation" in the populated screen, then the Forward arrow in the profitability segment is deriving the characteristics, then system lets us to save the Sales order with out any incompletion log.
I checked the OSS notes 114520, in this OSS note, my sitiuation is exactly first point but could not get any clue how to resolve automatically.
Why it is happening only when we edit the Sales Order? How to update bulk of Sales Order automatically?
Any inputs?
Thank you.

Hi
Since you have activated the Sales order flow to COPA, any change in the sales order triggers a Prof Segment redetermination.... Thats why you are able to save it once you redetermine the Prof Segment....
Ideally, if no Chars like Plant/Org Elements/etc are changed - It need not trigger the Prof Segment redetermination...
Refer  Note 729381 - When is a profitability segment supposed to be determined?.... With ref to this note, raise an OSS msg to SAP and check if it is possible to avoid the redetermination of PSG as long as none of the relevant chars are changed in the sales order....
There is a similar issue in MTO where by, even if you change the Header text of sales order, it triggers the Sales order cost estimate.... SAP provided a note to stop this... Note 1548608 & 1260868.... Your case is similar to this.... Raise an OSS to SAP and ask them if they can provide such a note for your case.... I feel, it should be possible for SAP to give this!
br, Ajay M

Similar Messages

  • Adding Variant in Header Level in the Sales Order

    Field "Card Verification Value" (CVV) is part of the Standard from Support Package SAPKH47028 onwards. But if you like you can use a variant for screen SAPMV45A4440 and set
    field "Card Verif.Code" to invisible in this variant.
    This is the reply from SAP after implementing the new support pack. Now there is an additional field in VA01 that I am trying to remove.
    I can add the variant in Table Settings but that is on Item Level in the Sales Order (VA01). How do I do it in Header Level?

    Hi,
    Go to SHD0 ,write down the Transaction code , transaction variant then go to Tab " With Processing'.
    Now you will be in T Code VA01 ,press enter and you will get all the variants maintained in Header Level.
    Now you can activate / deactivate as per your requirement.
    Best Regards,
    Ankur

  • Billing date at line item level in a sales order

    HI!
    Can anyone let me know the significance of billing date being present at the line item level in a sales order?
    And why does it get changed as per the Requested delivery date if the Prop. Pricing date in the maintanenece of sales doc type is set  as 'A'?
    Can it be different for different line items?

    Hello Asha,
    Can anyone let me know the significance of billing date being
    present at the line item level in a sales order ???
    The comprehensive information is available at SAP technical help(F1) for the "BILLING DATE" field at Sales Order line item level...Before raising these type of questions, i would urge to  conduct initiate analysis and then post at SDN forum if you are unable to find out answers...For your quick reference, i have extracted the same description for Billing date from SAP techincal help (F1) and pasted below.
    Billing date for billing index and printout
    +The date on which the billing is processed and booked for
    accounting purposes.+
    Use
    +You can use the billing date as one of the selection criteria
    when you process billing documents collectively.+
    Procedure
    +If invoice dates are defined for the customer, the system proposes
    the billing date from the invoice date calendar. If no invoice dates are
    agreed, then the actual goods issue date is formed on the basis of
    delivery related billing. In order related billing, the billing date of the
    order forms the basis of the billing date.+
    +If you are billing services, the system proposes the date of services
    rendered. You can change the date manually in the sales document.+
    +If you are using a billing plan to bill a project, the system can propose
    billing dates for the billing plan on the basis of planned or actual dates
    in the corresponding milestone.+
    +In a billing plan for a maintenance or rental contract, you can specify rules
    by which the system determines billing dates on the basis of other dates in the contract.+
    Regards,
    Sarthak

  • Shipping point at Item Level of a Sales Order

    Dear Gurus,
    Can anyone explain to me step by step how can I copy:
    1- The shipping point
    2- The route
    At Item level of a Sales Order in VA01
    Many thanks
    Regards
    Chris

    Dear Gurus,
    Can anyone explain to me step by step how can I copy:
    1- The shipping point
    2- The route
    At Item level of a Sales Order in VA01
    Many thanks
    Regards
    Chris
    Hi Chris,
    Answer to your Question,
    Please understand that Shipping Point and Route will be automatically determined based on the configuration settings we make. However we can even override the values manually in sales order screen (Va01 / Va02). See below the config settings to be made for  Shipping point and Route:
    1. Shipping Point.
    Based on the combination of below three parameters, Shipping Point will automatically populate while creating a Sale order. (VA01)
              Shipping Condition
              Loading Group
              Delivering Plant
    SPRO- Logistics Exceution - Shipping - Basic Shipping Functions - Shipping Point and Goods Receiving Point Determination - Assign Shipping Points
    2. Route
    Based on the following Four factors from configuration:
    Departure Zone of Shipping Point
    Destination Zone of Customer (Shipto)
    Shipping Condition from Customer master.
    Transportation Group from Material Master.
    Hope this Solves your Issue.
    Regards,
    VBASHA

  • SD - Manual entries allowed for item category in the Sales Order

    Hi experts,
    please do you know any OSS note related to SD, in order to increase the number of Manual entries allowed for item category in the Sales Order (table T184)?
    Thank you very much
    Andrea

    Hi,
    I searched OSS notes and did not find any OSS Note related to add more than 11 Manual Item categories or append T184 Table.
    Has any found solution for this, will this be a CORE MOD.
    Pavan Verma

  • Condition populated twice in the item conditions in the sales order

    Hi,
    We are creating the sales order through .csv flat file. The program calls the relevant BAPI which creates the sales order. It also fills the amount from the file for the manual condition type YNET in the pricing procedure. YNET is defaulted automatically in the sales order. But maintaining value is not mandatory.
    The problem is in sales order, YNET is displayed twice in the item conditions.
    One YNET with no value and another YNET with value which we passed through file.
    Any suggestions how we can get only one YNET in the item conditions in the sales order or how the value from our file can be added against the YNET in the pricing procedure with showing another YNET in the item conditions in the sales order
    Thanks in advance,

    Hi Ramakrishnan,
    Thanks for your reply. Its a manual condition type. No condition records maintained.
    Thanks,
    Ram
    Original thread:
    Hi,
    We are creating the sales order through .csv flat file. The program calls the relevant BAPI which creates the sales order. It also fills the amount from the file for the manual condition type YNET in the pricing procedure. YNET is defaulted automatically in the sales order. But maintaining value is not mandatory.
    The problem is in sales order, YNET is displayed twice in the item conditions.
    One YNET with no value and another YNET with value which we passed through file.
    Any suggestions how we can get only one YNET in the item conditions in the sales order or how the value from our file can be added against the YNET in the pricing procedure without showing another YNET in the item conditions in the sales order
    Thanks in advance,

  • Partial delivery at item level base-on sales order

    Dear experts
    In the customer code,the fileld 'Partial delivery per item' controls if Partial delivery allowed.
    In my scenario,i want to control the Partial delivery base-on every sales order not customer code.
    Because some sales order of this customer code will Partial delivery allowed,some not.
    If there are configuration to implement it?
    TKS!
    Edited by: stephen chow on Oct 20, 2008 5:15 PM

    Stephen,
    If you want to restrict the Partial delivery you can do this at 3 levels:
    Customer master
    Customer material info record
    Sales order.
    If you want the specific sale order to have the partial delivery control...you can set it at the sales order-item level-shipping
    If the restriction is on Material, then maintain CMIR
    Regards,
    Prakash

  • How to change the posting date at the line item level in a sales order

    how to change the posting date at the line item level in a sales order

    Hi,
    I believe the POSTING DATE will appear on the accounting document
    In the Accounting document, the posting date will be based on the  Billing date.
    Please let me know if you need any more details
    santosh

  • Display cost center field under item level when creating sales order

    Hi dear experts,
       during  the sales order creation(tcode VA01),  is it possible to display the cost center field in the tab account assignment under item level??
    currently we are using ECC6,in the tab account assignment, the cost center field was actually already defined in the screen by the system...i used to try to 'activate' the cost center field VBAP-KOSTL in the user exit  MV45AFZZ, but the cost center still not shown.
    I know that there is a config to the sales doc type can be used to open the cost center at header level, how about item level?
    thanks and best rgds
    Mu

    Hi,
    The Cost Center Determination settings is in OVF3 -  but there are some cases where the Cost Center must be exceptionally changed. 
    If the document category for order type in IMG VOV8 is defined to be "I" which belong to order type FD - Deliv.Free of Charge, then the field cost center is active for input during transaction VA01. 
    Alternatively, you can specify an order reason and assign a cost center to an order reason. 
    However the standard SAP works only at the header level though, so it would not work if cost center is needed on the line item. 
    The cost center are assign for such business transactions as :
    - Free deliveries
    - Returns
    - Deliveries of advertising materials
    You can also make cost center allocation dependent on the order reason, for example:
    Order reason: Damage in transit
    Order reason: Free sample
    Both the IMG settings are done in transaction OVF3, either with/without the order reason.
    regards,
    Siddharth.

  • How to change the product category on the item level of a Sales order

    1) For each product there are Basic Product Hierarchy and Sales Product
    Hierarchy.
    2) when creating sales order, system gets the Sales Product Hierarchy
    on the Item level with the default logic.
    So our question is: how to change the logic to let system get the Basic
    Product Hierarchy on the Item Level.

    Hi,
    I believe the POSTING DATE will appear on the accounting document
    In the Accounting document, the posting date will be based on the  Billing date.
    Please let me know if you need any more details
    santosh

  • Authority check at field level in the sales order

    Dear all, our business requirement is the following:
    only some users should be able to see the prices (including netwr, netpr,...) in the sales order depending on the authority check performed on the sales group field.
    This means that for an order of sales group 'A':
    a user of sales group 'A' can see the prices and change the order, a user of sales group 'B' cannnot see the prices but can change the order, a user of sales group 'C' can display the order but cannnot see the prices.
    I ask you if such a scenario can be realized in SAP.
    We currently run SAP ECC 5.0.
    thx all !
    bye Roberto

    Hi
    In general different users will be given different authorizations based on their role in the orgn.
    We create ROLES and assign the Authorization and TCODES for that role, so only that user can have access to those T Codes.
    USe SUIM and SU21 T codes for this.
    Much of the data in an R/3 system has to be protected so that unauthorized users cannot access it. Therefore the appropriate authorization is required before a user can carry out certain actions in the system. When you log on to the R/3 system, the system checks in the user master record to see which transactions you are authorized to use. An authorization check is implemented for every sensitive transaction.
    If you wish to protect a transaction that you have programmed yourself, then you must implement an authorization check.
    This means you have to allocate an authorization object in the definition of the transaction.
    For example:
    program an AUTHORITY-CHECK.
    AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT <authorization object>
    ID <authority field 1> FIELD <field value 1>.
    ID <authority field 2> FIELD <field value 2>.
    ID <authority-field n> FIELD <field value n>.
    The OBJECT parameter specifies the authorization object.
    The ID parameter specifies an authorization field (in the authorization object).
    The FIELD parameter specifies a value for the authorization field.
    The authorization object and its fields have to be suitable for the transaction. In most cases you will be able to use the existing authorization objects to protect your data. But new developments may require that you define new authorization objects and fields.
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/52/67167f439b11d1896f0000e8322d00/content.htm
    To ensure that a user has the appropriate authorizations when he or she performs an action, users are subject to authorization checks.
    Authorization : An authorization enables you to perform a particular activity in the SAP System, based on a set of authorization object field values.
    You program the authorization check using the ABAP statement AUTHORITY-CHECK.
    AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'S_TRVL_BKS'
    ID 'ACTVT' FIELD '02'
    ID 'CUSTTYPE' FIELD 'B'.
    IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.
    MESSAGE E...
    ENDIF.
    'S_TRVL_BKS' is a auth. object
    ID 'ACTVT' FIELD '02' in place 2 you can put 1,2, 3 for change create or display.
    The AUTHORITY-CHECK checks whether a user has the appropriate authorization to execute a particular activity.
    This Authorization concept is somewhat linked with BASIS people.
    As a developer you may not have access to access to SU21 Transaction where you have to define, authorizations, Objects and for nthat object you assign fields and values. Another Tcode is PFCG where you can assign these authrization objects and TCodes for a  profile and that profile in turn attached to a particular user.
    Take the help of the basis Guy and create and use.
    <b><REMOVED BY MODERATOR></b>
    regards
    Anji
    Message was edited by:
            Alvaro Tejada Galindo

  • ITEM LEVEL CONTROL IN SALES ORDER

    Dear All,
    In a sales order if I have 5 line items,usualy  if the stock is not there for first two line items, in delivery it will start with 3rd line item...Is there any control in item level where I can keep first line item as mandatory ,then only it should process to second line and 3rd line item with out using any userexit.
    Please help
    Regards
    CNRNAIR

    with out using any userexit.
    No unless you apply a suitable user exit, this requirement cannot be met.
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Dont allow to change item level data in sales order.

    Hi all,
    I have a requirement in which, users should not be allowed to change  item level data or not allowed to add any new items in sales order on a certain condition. But they should be allowed to change the header level data.
    How can i achieve this.
    Can anyone help me?

    Hi,
    Check below exit.
    MV45AFZZ and in form USEREXIT_MOVE_FIELD_TO_VBAP.
    Here check for ur validation, If passes then CHECK variable SVBAP-TABIX. If it is 0 then item is created. If it is GT 0 then item is changed. Other way could be...
    select data from VBAP for each sales document and item in xvbpa internal table.
    If for any item u don't have data in VBAP table that means u r adding that item. So issue error message.
    *       FORM USEREXIT_MOVE_FIELD_TO_VBAP                              *
    *       This userexit can be used to move some fields into the sales  *
    *       dokument item workaerea VBAP                                  *
    *       SVBAP-TABIX = 0:  Create item                                 *
    *       SVBAP-TABIX > 0:  Change item                                 *
    *       This form is called at the end of form VBAP_FUELLEN.          *
    Thanks,
    Vinod.

  • Force free item (TANN) in the sales order?

    Is there any way to force a free item (TANN category) to be added to a sales order (VA01)? Standard configuration cannot be used because users want the item to be added after they have filled in an custom (Z) field on a line.
    With standard free goods determination free item is added immediately after user hits [Enter]. But in this case they enter data for the line, hit [Enter], SAP goes through all its stuff and only then the field becomes available. After they fill in the field and hit [Enter] SAP doesn't go back to the same place where normally free goods are determined.
    Could I use some flag to fool the program into going back or is there an FM that I could call? Does anyone know where exactly standard free goods determination is performed?
    I've been debugging the whole day, so your help will be trully appreciated. Thanks!

    Thanks for your response. Basically yes, they want just to add a free item to the order, it's just not based on the material entered (otherwise standard would have worked fine) but on the custom "deal" field.
    User expectations are along these lines:
    1. User enters material, quantity, sales unit.
    2. Use goes to the tab 'Additional data B' on the item
    3. User enters 'Deal" and hits Enter (or goes back to the overview screen).
    4. Free item appears.
    The problem is that standard free goods determination happens between 1 and 2. Nothing happens between 3 and 4.

  • Make Net Value Field at item level Editable in Sales Order

    Hi
    All pricing in our system are manual .
    So the client wants to change the Net Value Field in Credit and Debit Memo Request to be Editable ( Currently it is not modifiable)
    Plz suggest how to g about it.
    Do i need to use Userexit_ Field_ Modification, if yes how , The field VBAP-NETWR.
    REgards
    Rohit

    Hi Yadav
    Changing Net Value will effect the updation of various tables ...so u r right not the correct approach .
    Can i put condition type and its value in Credit Request Memo and its value aditable same as in screen for Sales Order .if yes how , changing screen sequence group in credit memo request is creating problems
    Regards
    Rohit

Maybe you are looking for

  • Svg line chart  problem with latest patch?

    Hi team, I was checking out one page containing an SVG chart that I didn't modify in 2 weeks, according to the application builder, but it seems to hang after displaying the first line series of 4 total. It was working before the last patch was insta

  • Paramater Criteria not selecting correct data

    Why oh why would disco do this I have a field configured in the EUL to a format mask of "Mon" it shows a truncated date field with Jan, Feb, Mar etc... When I put selection criteria on the field to only display JAN it brings back the columns with Jan

  • Error in ODS Activation

    Hi Friends, I got error when the ODS activating in Process Chain. The Error Messages are 1. Inconsistent aggregation behavior - activation will be terminated. 2 Activation of M records from DataStore object 0PUR_DS03 terminated in the data target (OD

  • Activity/Individual Object Relation

    Hi all, We have activities with relations to individual objects (vehicles, in our case). How can I get the individual objects which are related to specific activity? Is there any FM available? Thanks ahead,

  • Layer Mask vs Quick selection

    hey there, I don' understand the difference between the quick selection tool and the layer mask option. What exactly does a layer mask do? And what are the advantages compared to the quick selection tool? thanks in advance