Inconsistencies between DEV and QAS query output

Hi all -
I am currently using a BI query in my VC model that I send the output to a table in VC, note that I am showing only a few fields from the output. This works for some tables in my model that use another query.
The problem is that when I change the alias (using the Alias Manager tool) from BI DEV to QAS, then deploy, the number of columns is changing in my table and seems to give me all of the potential query output and not only the fields I have selected in my model.
To make a test, I have tried to hide the output fields in the BI query itself, and this seems to have a direct effect on the shown columns in VC but creates some other unwanted problem. In fact, it works for the other query...
Anyone had the same problem? could that be a refreshing problem?
Thank you,
Claude.

Hi
It could be a refresh problem. Try to change the RFC from the query definition & refrech the 'Data service'. Then test the output of the query from 'Test Query' then save & deploy. Also in Columns try with the charachters where type is 'Text'.
Regards
Sandeep

Similar Messages

What is CTS ? what is the role of CTS in between DEV and QAS?

Dear
What is CTS ? what is the role of CTS in between DEV and QAS?
Thanx & Regards
Mohamamd Nabi
[email protected]

hello, friend.
actually, you can search for subjects like this in the threads archive. you will be pleasantly surprised to find that there are already many threads with similar issues and that you can find answers to even more otherwise unrealized questions. and you don't have to wait for anyone to reply.
it looks like the issue is urgent for you, and this is why i am attaching this feed from Sadhu Kishore, which was posted some time ago... (if he replies to your thread, you may choose to award him points).
"Hi,
The transport workflow provides a framework for transporting enhancements or new developments of existing business functions in a system landscape. It provides a direct connection between development and transport administration. The transport workflow manages the transport process, determines the user for each individual step automatically, and then displays an interface which they can use to perform the task directly.
It is an efficient method of transporting a selected number of requests into a group of transport targets, and uses clearly defined approval steps to ensure the quality of your target systems. The requests can be transportable change requests, Customizing requests, relocation transports or transports of copies. The transport targets do not need to be located on defined transport routes. However, the transport workflow can involve some risks, caused by the dependencies between transport requests:
Import sequence
It is important that you import requests in the correct order, so that development work is up-to-date in the target system.
Incompleteness
It is important that the functions transported in the transport proposal are complete; otherwise errors may occur in the import system.
A request is not imported, but it contains an important data element. You use another request to transport a table that references this data element. Since the referenced data element does not exist in the target system, activation errors will occur when you import the second request.
The transport workflow is a generic workflow. Its ability to process the transport route configuration in TMS enables it to adapt itself to any system landscape. This means you can transport multiple requests into multiple targets, even if these targets are not located on the transport routes.
This reduces the amount of work for the transport administrator significantly. The automated nature of the workflow also reduces the likelihood of errors during transports.
You can use the transport workflow in two different ways.
Transport workflow as a transport strategy
If you have production systems in your landscape that can only accept approved transports, we recommend that you use the transport workflow to organize and coordinate the transport process.
To do this, set Workflow-controlled transports as your transport strategy and configure the transport workflow.
When you release a transport request, the transport workflow starts automatically and the screen Create Transport Proposal appears. The requests are then released implicitly when the transport proposal is sent to the transport administrator.
Special transport workflow (mass transports)
You can use the special transport workflow to make transports that do not follow the defined transport routes or that take place outside the normal transport schedule (part of the mass transport strategy). These transports may be corrections made in the development system that have to be transported into the production system without delay.
To use the special transport workflow, set Mass transports as your transport strategy and configure the transport workflow."
thanks. you have been most generous.
regards.

Compare SPRO between DEV and QAs

Hi there,
I'm in GoLive eve and all consultants are desperate with the future problems.
Is there a way that I can compare the customizing (SPRO) between DEV and QAS or another system?
Thanks,
Dany Anderson
Edited by: Dany Anderson Alves on Mar 4, 2008 9:03 PM

Hi,
Use comparison tool in SCU0.
Select SAP Reference IMG and ssay compare.
This will show the differences if any.
You can also compare at component level.
cross system visibility should be maintained in SCC4 settings for the client
Regards,
Revathi

Problem between DEV and QAS in SPDD and SPAU

Hello,
We adjusted the SPDD in the ACT_UPG and he SPAU in the post processing and everything was right.
When I try to install the QAS I gave the installer both transport but tells me this:
1 ETQ004 USER DECISIONS ABOUT PROCESS OF ADJUSTEMENTS
4 ETQ430 START reading "umodstat.lst" in directory "/usr/sap/trans/EHPI/abap/bin"
3 ETQ433 END   reading "umodstat.lst" in directory "/usr/sap/trans/EHPI/abap/bin"
4 ETQ427 START deciding about "SPDD" in release "701"
4 ETQ500 INFO number of objects in repairs   : "92"
4 ETQ501 INFO number of objects in transports: "82"
4 ETQ430 START reading "umodauto.lst" in directory "/usr/sap/trans/EHPI/abap/bin"
4 ETQ431       "2" entries read
4 ETQ432       read: rc="2"
3 ETQ433 END   reading "umodauto.lst" in directory "/usr/sap/trans/EHPI/abap/bin"
3WETQ498       transport "XXXXXXX" found. It seems NOT(!) to be OK
that in SPDD
3 ETQ438 END   writing entry to "umodauto.imp" in directory "/usr/sap/trans/EHPI/abap/bin"
4 ETQ454       user wants to check the transport result in "SPDD"
2 ETQ504 INFO upgrade will halt for "SPDD" in release "701"
3 ETQ429 END   deciding about "SPDD" in release "701"
4 ETQ427 START deciding about "SPAU" in release "701"
4 ETQ500 INFO number of objects in repairs   : "593"
4 ETQ501 INFO number of objects in transports: "495"
4 ETQ430 START reading "umodauto.lst" in directory "/usr/sap/trans/EHPI/abap/bin"
4 ETQ431       "2" entries read
4 ETQ432       read: rc="2"
3 ETQ433 END   reading "umodauto.lst" in directory "/usr/sap/trans/EHPI/abap/bin"
3WETQ498       transport "XXXXXXXXXX" found. It seems NOT(!) to be OK
that is on SPAU
The system before the migration, were both recreated from a PRD backup so it should be the same.
Please help me with this

Hello Carlos,
this error is mostly related to the second run of an Upgrade (either to QA or PRD systems), when SPAU/SPDD already have a request assigned for them. Please check notes #68678 and #610311.
If this does not help, please list the content of phase PREP_INTEGRATION/ADJUSTPRP (as seen in the sapehpiconsole.log)
Best regards,
Tomas Black

Performance problems between dev and prod

I run the same query with identical data and indexes, but one system takes a 0.01 seconds to run while the production system takes 1.0 seconds to run. TKprof for dev is:
Rows Row Source Operation
1 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID VAP_BANDVALUE
3 NESTED LOOPS
1 NESTED LOOPS
41 NESTED LOOPS
41 NESTED LOOPS
1 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID VAP_PACKAGE
1 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN SYS_C0032600 (object id 51356)
41 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID VAP_BANDELEMENT
41 AND-EQUAL
82 INDEX RANGE SCAN IDX_BE2 (object id 53559)
41 INDEX RANGE SCAN IDX_BE1 (object id 53558)
41 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID VAP_BAND
41 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN SYS_C0034599 (object id 53556)
1 INDEX UNIQUE SCAN SYS_C0032549 (object id 51335)
1 INDEX RANGE SCAN IDX_BV1 (object id 53557)Tkprof for Prod is :
Rows Execution Plan
0 SELECT STATEMENT MODE: ALL_ROWS
1 TABLE ACCESS MODE: ANALYZED (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'VAP_BANDVALUE' (TABLE)
52001 NESTED LOOPS
26000 NESTED LOOPS
26000 NESTED LOOPS
26000 NESTED LOOPS
1 TABLE ACCESS MODE: ANALYZED (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'VAP_PACKAGE' (TABLE)
1 INDEX MODE: ANALYZED (UNIQUE SCAN) OF 'SYS_C0018725' (INDEX (UNIQUE))
26000 TABLE ACCESS MODE: ANALYZED (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'VAP_BANDELEMENT' (TABLE)
26000 INDEX MODE: ANALYZED (RANGE SCAN) OF 'IDX_BE2' (INDEX)
26000 TABLE ACCESS MODE: ANALYZED (BY INDEX ROWID) OF 'VAP_BAND' (TABLE)
26000 INDEX MODE: ANALYZED (UNIQUE SCAN) OF 'SYS_C0030648' (INDEX (UNIQUE))
26000 INDEX MODE: ANALYZED (UNIQUE SCAN) OF 'SYS_C0018674' (INDEX (UNIQUE))
26000 INDEX MODE: ANALYZED (RANGE SCAN) OF 'IDX_BV1' (INDEX).The row count varies greatly. But it shouldn't as the data is the same.
Any ideas?

From DEV you show the Row Source Operations for the query. The column named "Rows" signifies the actual number of rows processed with each step.
From PROD you show the Execution Plan for the query; that is, tkprof was executed with the EXPLAIN option which generates the execution plan as of the time when tkprof was run. The "Rows" column in the Explain Plan output comes from the PLAN_TABLE.CARDINALITY, which represents an estimate by the CBO for the number of rows [expected to be] processed with each step.
So, if by <quote>The row count varies greatly</quote> you meant these "Rows" columns outputs then you're are comparing actuals from a database with estimates from another. Get the Row Source Operations from both.
"Identical data and indexes":
1. data may be the same, but it is not necessarily stored physically the same way.
2. Indexes being the same means their definitions are the same; again, physically they are not necessarily identical
In other words, data in PROD (the way it is stored on disk) may have evolved as a result of discrete deletes/updates/inserts ... in DEV it could be, for example, stored more compact if you took a copy of PROD and moved into DEV. So, the number of blocks for your segments will likely be different between PROD and DEV, the clustering factor for your indexes are likely different, etc ... things which could [and do] influence the CBO. The statistics may be different.
I guess what I'm saying is ... it is quite hard, if not outright impossible, to get two identical databases/instances/load ... hence, don't expect the executions to be 100% identical, even if you have "identical data and indexes". By all means compare between DEV and PROD (make sure you compare the same thing though) and use the observed differences as an indicator for further investigation ... don't chase the goal of 100% identical behavior.
Now, by all means look at that query taking 1 second in PROD ... I have only addressed <quote>The row count varies greatly. But it shouldn't as the data is the same.</quote>

Consistency between dev and prod systems!!!!

Hi All,
I wuld like to check the consistency between Dev and Prod systems for all the Data model and other objects existing. I would like to do this sanity check to see whether the two systems are in sync. Are there any tools or transaction codes within SAP framework which can guide me in this direction.
Kind Regards,
Surya Tamada.

Hi Surya ,
First build whole data flow :
1 .Create Infoarea ,Infoobjects & Masterdata ,Infoproviders ,Infoobject Catelog under Infoarea,MetaData - Characteristics MeteData - Key Figures
2 DSOs ,Infocubes ,Infosets, Multiproviders ,Views in the development system ,Datasources for BW system,Flat File Datasources,Transformations
then get data from the se11 tables as per your requirement :
like RSDVCHA ,RSDBCHATR,RSDCUBEIOBJ,RSDICMULTIIOBJ etc and built view on it as per your requirement .
then built flat file data sources and transformation .
get all data downloaded to flat file in ur PC .In the same way from other system.
make flow from PC File Datasource -> DSO -> Infocube and build queries for different objects .load the downloaded files to them and then run query .
ex : query to compare cube will take cube name and systems name as input and compare objects .
Regards,
Jaya

Not able to comapre roles in DEV and QAS using SUIM?

Hi,
I am trying to compare role in both DEV and QAS, DEV and PRD using SUIM t-code.
While comapring its showing that roles are in different systems, not able to comapre.
Actually role exisitng in both QAS and PRD.
Individually I can login to QAS, PRD can see the role.

For role comparision both the roles must be in the same system, in same client
Transaction code SUIM -> Comparision-> Roles
If the roles are in different system, then tranport the role into one of the system and do comparision. If no transport connection defined then, you can use the upload and download option in the PFCG
comparing
Run the t-code SUIM
Go To Comparison and select the option of roles
Click on Across systems option it will give option to select the sys name under Remote Comparison there enter the SYS ID between which system you want to do comparison and put the role name in compare role section then execute it will give you the result.
If there is any difference b/wn the t-codes it will b in red colour otherwisein yellow.

Sort Dumps All Over in DEV and QAS While Applying Patches - Help Pls

Applying about 80 patches on DEV and QAS over the weekend with the "Minimize Downtime" option. I got failure at the "TEST_IMPORT" phase and tried to backout and ignore the error but now I keep getting short dumps for any tcode that I use. I can't get past short dumps.
Here is a sample of short dump that I got when I try to execute SPAM and reapply just one patch. I does not load the patch, it just generates a short dump. I opened an OSS note with SAP and they refused to consider that as high priority. Since my DEV and QAS systems are down, the developers will not have any system to work on today and there will be a lot pressure on me today. Please help.
Short Dump text below
The following syntax error occurred in the program SAPLKKBL :
"The field "GFLG_NESTED_PRINT_ON" is unknown, but there is a field with"
Error in ABAP application program.
The current ABAP program "CL_GUI_ALV_GRID===============CP" had to be
terminated because one of the
statements could not be executed.
This is probably due to an error in the ABAP program.
What can you do?
Please eliminate the error by performing a syntax check
(or an extended program check) on the program "SAPLKKBL ".
You can also perform the syntax check from the ABAP/4 Editor.
If the problem persists, proceed as follows:
Print out the error message (using the "Print" function)
and make a note of the actions and input that caused the
error.
To resolve the problem, contact your SAP system administrator.
You can use transaction ST22 (ABAP Dump Analysis) to view and administer
termination messages, especially those beyond their normal deletion

Hi
Please check the following link, it may help you:
Re: Can not lanche workflow with event
Can you give me some more details like whether the patch application is complete or its hung in between? Did u tried to restart the patch application? Can you tell me what error you got while patch application in import_proper phase?
Regards
Sumit

Special Characters issue in DEV and QAS

Hi,
I am uploading a file that has special characters (Japanese).
In the DEV system the special character is converted to #. Which the business wants.
In QAS system the special character is not converted and is as it is, which makes the business users difficult to find out if any speical characters are there and they don't want the special character as it is
The file consists millions of record with a possibility of four or five records with special characters
The special characters on keyboards is not an issue.
The programs in DEV and QAS system are same and the file tested is also the same but different results.
Tried in Tcode SNLS to find something but didn't know what and where to look into.
What could be the issue in this? Looks like this is Basis issue but would like to know if anyone can let me know.......
Regards
Sandeep

Hi ,
i want to check ur open dataset statement in the program which is being used here if at all in ur case.
Can you please check the relavant code page in both the D and Q systems and search with the appropriate hexa decimal values(for the special characters ) in both the systems ..
u can use code page by tcode scp ..
ex -> as u say a special char sp1 is having entry in q and code page which is being used (like 4200 )
is not having in d03 .
then if in d03 this page has no entry then it shows as # , since it is showing in q then it has an entry over there. this is my guess..
so if at all the client wants not to see this special char's , u need to remove them from this code page.. and check ..
Cant say if this can solve but u can take this as one more way of dealing with code pages and special chars....
br vijay..

FB60 screen change layout different between DEV and PRD

Hi,
I'm having problem with transaction FB60. When i try to change the layout in PRD, in screen Edit System Setting, some of the field showing 0 length. For example in WBS element field, in DEV show length 24 but PRD show length 0. I try to compare the version but it is same (program & table structure - ACGL_ITEM). When I debug the program, found out that it will get the structure from sap internal c program call 'AB_GET_CX_DATA'. So, maybe this program version are different between DEV and PRD.
Anybody knows what is the cause of this problem? Or maybe somebody can tell me how to check sap internal c program.
Thank you very much.

Yes. FB60 is Enter Vendor Invoice. In this screen you can see a table with column such as GL Acct, Debit/Credit, Amount in DC, Cost Center and others. You can add or remove some of the field using Table Setting and create Screen Variant. My problem is, the length of WBS Element and Profit Center field is 0. How to change the length.
I already searched in forum but I only found how to create screen variant.
Thanks.

Importing Program from Production System to DEV and QAS.

Hi All,
I have 3 Systems in my Landscape.
DEV-> QAS-> PRD
One of my Z program is running in the Production system.
This Z program is got deleted in the DEV and QAS.
How can I import the Program from Production System to QAS and DEV.
Regards,
Viji.

hi Vijaya laxmi,
you can goto Production system ---> SE38/ SA38 and copy the program and create the same in program using SE38 in Development system and then transport it to Quality system.
You can also Re-Import the Request from Production to Dev system.
Thanks,
Nelson
Edited by: Nelson karunakar on Sep 18, 2008 7:15 AM

Using same webdypro iview with DEV and QAS

Dear Sir,
We have the webdynpro program iview in EP 7.0 , however, I would like to change the same webdynpro iveiw with different client in Sap DEV and QAS, Is it possible? Or how to change the connection to SAP system.
Please kindly advise.
Thank you and best regards,
Vimol

Vimol,
Yes, you can do it.
Procedure :
Logon to NWDS : -> Windows-> Preferances->J2ee Engine
First mention the QAS system on which you want to deploy the application.
Then change these parameters and point to the DEV system.
Now, you have finished deploying the application in both the servers successfully.
1.Logon to the QAS system
http://fqdn:portnumber/sld
2.login as a J2ee_admin
3.Create a technical system and test the jcos that you are using in your application there. After the JCOs are tested and pinged successfully, run the application and test.
4. Finally, create a web dynpro iview and assign it to the users or roles you want.
Repeat the same steps for your DEV system and you are good to go.
Hope this helps.
Cheers,
Sandeep Tudumu

PRD installation in a differenet domain than DEV and QAS

Dear Experts,
I need to install SAP ECC 6 and PI 7.1 on production servers.Our dev and qas servers are running in the domain X(for eg) and the PRD servers are in the domain Y(for eg).All the servers are supposed to be in the same landscape.Do I have to include the prd servers also in the same domain as dev and qas or will it cause any issues running them in different domain ?If it gives issues pls let me know the the kind of issues it will be as I need to give my IT team proper reasons to run all the servers in the same domain.
I know some reasons like servers should be in the same domain if we use common transport directory.
Please let me know if there are any other reasons.
Regards,
Dinakar
Edited by: mutnuru dinakar on Apr 13, 2011 7:19 AM

Hi Sunny,
Thanks.your notes are helpful.From PI point of view,running dev PI and prd PI in different domains will cause any issues?
Suggestions of others will also be appreciated.
Regards,
Dinakar
Edited by: mutnuru dinakar on Apr 18, 2011 1:44 PM

Role difference in DEV and QAS?

Hi
I made some changes to role in DEV and moved to QAS.
Whatever changes I made in DEV, are reflecting in QAS, But SUIM comaprision of roles, it's showing 3 objects are existing in DEV, but not there in QAS.
I opened the role in DEV, tried to find these objects.
Actually these 3 objects not at all existing in DEV also.
Then why in SUIM comaprison it's showing these 3 objects existing in DEV, not QAS.
Cheers
Sreenivasu Balaka

Hi Sreenivasu,
maybe the cause is the same as you have mentioned in Profile not generated in QAS even though same as DEV? ....
Try first to generate both profiles in DEV and QAS. run the compare then again....
Still some differences?
b.rgds, Bernhard

DEV and QAS copy from PRD

Hi,
We have ERP 2004 on Windows 2003 with SQL 2005.
Due to some corrections(config changes and abap corrections) were made directly made in our PRD System, we now need to completely refresh our DEV and QAS system with PRD.
As we do not have enough space to make a system copy, please suggest me a way to do a complete refresh without PRD data getting into DEV and QAS servers.
Thanks and Regards
Dev

Hi Mukund,
In your scenario , better to go for client export / Import process in order to refresh .
Select the appropriate profile :
SAP_ALL    All Client-Specific Data w/o Change Documents
SAP_CUST   Customizing
SAP_CUSV   Customizing and User Variants
SAP_CUSX   Customizing w/o Authorization Profiles and Roles
SAP_EXBC   Customizing, Users and Cross-Client Customizing
SAP_EXPA   SAP_ALL with Cross-Client Customizing
SAP_EXPC   Customizing Including Cross-Client Customizing
SAP_PROF   Only Authorization Profiles and Roles
SAP_RECO   Recovery (Only if Source Client = Target Client)
SAP_UCSV   Customizing, User Master Records and User Variants
SAP_UCUS   Customizing and User Master Records
SAP_UONL   User Without Authorization Profiles and Roles
SAP_USER   User Master Records and Authorization Profiles
I think you need   SAP_EXPC    " Customizing Including Cross-Client Customizing " .
Do not go for SAP_ALL as it contains all config and data .
Regards,
Nibu

Inconsistencies between DEV and QAS query output

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for