Inconsistency between catalog authoring tool & Search engine

Hi,
We are on CCM2.0 and SRM5.0 with catalog deployment in the same client as SRM.
In our implementation we are using master catalog and product catalog. We have very recently deleted around 65 items from our product catalog which is mapped to mater catalog and hence those 65 items are not found anymore in master catalog in CAT (Catalog authoring tool).
This master catalog when published, we expect that these 65 products should not be available for end users.
But end users can still see the deleted items through CSE (Catalog search engine). Thus there is data inconsistency between CAT & CSE.
Has anyone faced similar issue before if yes can you please share the same with us.
Edited by: Manoj Surve on Mar 24, 2009 7:05 AM

Run TCODE SE38 program /CCM/CLEANUP_MAPPING to look for errors/orphaned records in test mode.
If you want to clear out orphaned records uncheck the Test Mode but:
Warning: This program can slow down a production system as it clears out the memory buffers for user catalog searches and these have to be built up again by the users doing searches.  This can be  hours to days depending upon the size of your system and the number of users.
In Dev or UAt no problem.
Hope this helps?
Regards
Allen

Similar Messages

  • Why is there a one-inch gap between FF logo and search engines?(I'm using FF4).

    I recently downloaded FF 4.I'm not technically savvy,and was a bit confused to see a drop down menu and the word "Firefox".
    I didn't like the new set-up and managed to delete it, in favor of the logo.
    Now,the opening page is in the background and there is a one-inch gap between the logo and the search engine.Is there a way to have a space reduction?
    F11 is NOT a resolution.

    You can make FF4 look like FF3 by doing the following.<br><br>
    * Right click a blank part of the tab bar and click "Tabs on top" to remove the checkmark. Tabs will subsequently reappear below the search bar.<br><br>
    * Repeat the same steps, but click the top one called "Menu bar". This will reinstate the text links at the top.<br><br>
    * To rearrange the layout, repeat the same steps again and choose "Customize". A panel will open and while that remains onscreen, you can move elements like toolbars, buttons etc around and place them anywhere you wish. You can also drag anything you don't like into that panel and add anything you want by dragging it out of there.<br><br>
    * To replace the status bar at the foot of the page, install this add-on: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/status-4-evar/<br><br>

  • How do I specify a different search engine?

    I'm running ML with Safari 6. I see that it is possible to choose between one of 3 ****** search engines. How do I specify a search engine that isn't a piece of dog ****? This applies to iOS as well which has the same ****** limitations. Is Apple trying to see how ****** and annoying they can make Safari? Just a question!
    Thank you!

    These are the three major search engines? Who decided that? What a crock. I'm sorry this smacks of fascism. This is restriction of choice, restriction of the free flow of information. I'd absolutely call it a monoploy practice, collusion. I'm calling my senator to inform them that Apple is enforcing the monopoly of search by Google and Bing.

  • Change "Bing" from the defalt search engine setting 2. How can I have snipping tool on taskbar

    Can you please tell me how I can change Bing as the default search engine setting on my browser? I have checked the internet option and account setting. It doesn't seem it can be done.

    Refer this :
    http://windows.microsoft.com/en-in/windows/change-choose-internet-explorer-search-provider#1TC=windows-7
    For snipping tool : 
    When you open the tool, on task-bar, right click and click on Pin the program on Task bar. 
    Arnav Sharma | http://arnavsharma.net/ Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading
    the thread.

  • Since updating to 3.6.1 I don't get an empty browser window in my tool bar whe. it opens --- just a list of search engines. I can't find anything in "Help" or the FAQ's that seem to address this. My only choice seems to go back to Safari.

    Since updating to 3.6.1 I don’t get an empty browser window in my tool bar when it opens --- just a list of search engines. I can’t find anything in “Help” or the FAQ’s that seem to address this.
    My only choice seems to go back to Safari.

    I am not sure what your problem is, can you give more details.
    One possibility is you may be in full screen mode, for details on fixing that see the [[menu bar is missing]] article.
    If you are missing various toolbar items, see the [[back and forward or other toolbar items are missing]] article.
    If your problem is something else please give more details.

  • Free iWeb SEO Tool to Help Improve Search Engine Rankings

    Hi,
    I have just posted a free iWeb SEO Tool that will let you add and edit all your meta tags and header information, as well as a few other important search engine optimization factors. Here is a brief description of what it can do;
    iWeb SEO Tool is the only software that makes it easy to get your iWeb built website ready for search engines.
    Since Apple has often neglected key SEO strategies in their iWeb software, it is difficult for many iWeb based websites to rank high in search engines. This is why we have created this free utility to help you properly optimize your website.
    Features include;
    1) Easily add meta tags such as description and keywords
    2) Edit your title tags for each pages
    3) Add robot rules and language meta tags
    4) Add alternative text for images
    5) All settings are saved in a private database so next time you publish your site you can take all the saved SEO copy and apply to your new site
    6) Edit sites locally or directly on your iDisk
    I am looking for feedback on this tool to see how useful it can be. If you find any problems, please let me know. You can download this tool by creating a free beta testers account at;
    http://www.trybeta.com/home/
    Please let me know if this is useful for anyone. It is completely free for all iWeb users.
    *I may receive some form of compensation, financial or otherwise, from my recommendation or link*
    <Edited by Moderator>

    1. To publish to .Mac just mount your iDisk and go to Web/Sites/ and you will see your old site there. Delete that site and just copy your new site to the location.
    2. Just press the load from iDisk button in the toolbar and enter your username and password. Your sites from your iDisk will load in iWeb SEO Tool.

  • Firefox tells me it can harm my computer and when I accept it it says that maybe I don't have permissions to access it. It all started when I accidentaly installed "Babylon" search engine tool bar, when I removed it, the system started blocking Firefox

    I accidentally installed the Babylone search engine tool bar while dowloading a program and when I realized that Firefox had been substituded I tried to get back and even ran a restore for the system. Since then, everytime I try to reisnstall Firefox, there is a message that says that Firefox can harm my system and when I ignore it, it says that maybe I don't have permits or licenses for it. I am frustrates as even the menu bar from my alternative search engine, Google Chrome, has disappeared.
    Please write back and tell me what to do

    You may also need to create a new profile in case more files were damaged by closing down Firefox that way.
    See http://kb.mozillazine.org/Standard_diagnostic_-_Firefox#Profile_issues

  • How search engine submission tool can be developed??

    Hi,
    I want to develop a search engine submission tool. How i can access the database of google like searchengines. Any body pls pointout some clues.
    If anybody solved the same problem pls give mail id for further communications.

    Read the submission rules of every search site then write some code that does what they tell you to do.
    Why do you ask here when all these search sites publish this info themselves?

  • Keyboard shortcuts to switch between search engines stopped working

    The latest version of Firefox looks great but unfortunately the keyboard shortcuts that I use all the time to switch between search engines stopped working which leaves me stuck with version 33.1.
    I'm talking about the shortcuts Ctrl + ↑ and Ctrl + ↓ described in this page:
    https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/keyboard-shortcuts-perform-firefox-tasks-quickly#w_search
    Please solve this! Thanks.

    This worked perfectly, many thanks!!!

  • How can I get rid of Nation as my tool bar search engine.

    Greetings,
    I am extremely frustrated with Nation as my search engine on my Safari Web browser. Can someone please help me get rid of it? Here is a screen shot of what I see.  I would really appreciate any support.
    Thank you,
    Balde

    Why don't you just go into ~/Library and remove the add-ons, extensions, plists
    Look in Preferences, Safari, Application Support, and look turn off 3rd party extensions.
    If you don't want to delete, then move them aside.
    Also clone your system. CCC does not copy everything and also gives you the freedom to test and try and make any changes you want safely and freely. Sometimes you can't make changes on a live system. And Resetting Safari for one does not remove all the metadata and temp files it keeps.
    What other browser are you trying with? Firefox, Chrome, OmniWeb....

  • Under "options" in tools, I removed Bing as my search engine. Now, I have no left or right arrows for returning to the preceding page.

    I've tried to get Bing back as the search engine, so as to enable the left and right arrows at the top left of the page, but cannot get it back.

    ran malawrebytes, it removed a registry key entry for search protect. seems to have solved it. AVG would have search protect as something to be deleted, but didn't seem to fix it. running malawarebytes removed key and seems to be fixed. I don't know if running AVG first is necessary.

  • In the search section of the tool bar, I used to have Google as my search engine now it is Norton Safe Search. How can I get Google back?

    As stated above, I used to have Google as my search engine now it is Norton Safe Search. How can I get Google back?

    See these threads about searchqu:
    *[/questions/816181]
    *[/questions/790833]

  • Ask becomes my first choice search engine repeatedly. I don't want that one. I have removed it from manage search engines and from Tools Addons. I also get a box in FireFox at the bottom that asks me to reset or choose Ask again. I don't like FFv4 either.

    Must remove Ask search engine.

    Dig this cats. Go to your Mozilla start up page. Go to Google home page. Then drag the Google Icon on the left side by the search bar over to the Icon of a home on the upper right side and Google will be restored as your home page. I hate you Ask.com, you were like a leach!

  • How difference between Adobe captivate with Adobe captivate authoring tools

    I just confused coz I cant edit the widget via captivate 7. Some expertise said I need to have Captivate authoring tool to edit and modify the widget.
    PS. while I clicked on the aidget the library present a link to SWF file.

    You do not need any add on to install the widget. The widgets are installed when you install Captivate.
    Captivate widgets are created in Flash. If you know Flash and ActionScript, you can create one of your own. The Flash source files of the existing widgets are at:
    C:\Program Files\Adobe\Adobe Captivate 7 x64\Gallery\Widgets\Source
    You can find some info on this at:
    http://helpx.adobe.com/captivate/using/create-widgets.html
    http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1203981
    Sreekanth

  • Inconsistency between get-childitem -include and -exclude parameters

    Hi,
    Powershell 2.0
    Does anyone else consider this a minor design bug in the Get-ChildItem command?  
    # create dummy files
    "a","b","c" | % {$null | out-file "c:\temp\$_.txt"}
    # this "fails", returns nothing
    get-childitem c:\temp -include a*,b*
    # this "works", returns desired files
    get-childitem c:\temp\* -include a*,b*
    # this "works", excludes undesired files
    get-childitem c:\temp -exclude a*,b*
    # this "fails", excludes undesired files BUT RECURSES sub-directories
    get-childitem c:\temp\* -exclude a*,b*
    I'm writing a wrapper script around the GCI cmdlet, but the inconsistency between the two parameters is problematic.  My end user will surely just type a path for the path parameter, then wonder why -include returned nothing.  I can't unconditionally
    add an asterisk to the path parameter, since that messes up the exclude output.
    I'm just wondering why Microsoft didn't make the parameter interaction consistent???  
    # includes desired files in the specified path
    get-childitem -path c:\temp -include a*,b*
    # excludes undesired files in the specified path
    get-childitem -path c:\temp -exclude a*,b*
    # combine both options
    get-childitem -path c:\temp -include a*,b* -exclude *.log,*.tmp
    # same as above, the asterisk doesn't matter
    get-childitem -path c:\temp\* -include a*,b*
    get-childitem -path c:\temp\* -exclude a*,b*
    get-childitem -path c:\temp\* -include a*,b* -exclude *.log,*.tmp
    # same as above, but explicitly recurse if that's what you want
    get-childitem -path c:\temp\* -include a*,b* -recurse
    get-childitem -path c:\temp\* -exclude a*,b* -recurse
    get-childitem -path c:\temp\* -include a*,b* -exclude *.log,*tmp -recurse
    If I execute the "naked" get-childitem command, the asterisk doesn't matter...
    # same results
    get-childitem c:\temp
    get-chileitem c:\temp\*
    If this isn't considered a bug, can you explain why the inconsistency between the two parameters when combined with the -path parameter?
    Thanks,
    Scott

    The Get-ChildItem cmdlet syntax is horrific for advanced use. It's not a bug in the classic sense, so you shouldn't call it that. However, feel free to call it awful, ugly, disastrous, or any other deprecatory adjective you like - it really is
    nasty.
    Get-ChildItem's unusual behavior is rooted in one of the more 'intense' dialogues between developers and users in the beta period. Here's how I recall it working out; some details are a bit fuzzy for me at this point.
    Get-ChildItem's original design was as a tool for enumerating items in a namespace -
    similar to but not equivalent to dir and
    ls. The syntax and usage was going to conform to standard PowerShell (Monad at the time) guidelines.
    In a nutshell, what this means is that the Path parameter would have truly just meant Path - it would not have been usable as a combination path specification and result filter, which it is now. In other words
    (1) dir c:\temp
    means you wanted to return children of the container c:\temp
    (2) dir c:\temp\*
    means you wanted to return children of all containers inside
    c:\temp. With (2), you would never get c:\tmp\a.txt returned, since a.txt is not a container.
    There are reasons that this was a good idea. The parameter names and filtering behavior was consistent with the evolving PowerShell design standards, and best of all the tool would be straightforward to stub in for use by namespace
    providers consistently.
    However, this produced a lot of heated discussion. A rational, orthogonal tool would not allow the convenience we get with the dir command for doing things like this:
    (3) dir c:\tmp\a*.txt
    Possibly more important was the "crash" factor.  It's so instinctive for admins to do things like (3) that our fingers do the typing when we list directories, and the instant failure or worse, weird, dissonant output we would get with a more pure Path
    parameter is exactly like slamming into a brick wall.
    At this point, I get a little fuzzy about the details, but I believe the Get-ChildItem syntax was settled on as a compromise that wouldn't derail people expecting files when they do (3), but would still allow more complex use.  I think that this
    is done essentially by treating all files as though they are containers for themselves. This saves a lot of pain in basic use, but introduces other pain for advanced use.
    This may shed some light on why the tool is a bit twisted, but it doesn't do a lot to help with your particular wrapping problem. You'll almost certainly need to do some more complicated things in attempting to wrap up Get-ChildItem. Can you describe some
    details of what your intent is with the wrapper? What kind of searches by what kind of users, maybe? With those details, it's likely people can point out some specific approaches that can give more consistent results.

Maybe you are looking for