Inconsistency PR in MD04

Hello SAP gurus,
one MRP generated PR is existing in MD04, when I checked the PR no line item is there. Because of that PR I am getting inaccurate MRP records for the material numbers.
Can some one please let me know how to resolve this issue?
I just want to clean the PR from MD04 screen.
Thanks
Sha

Hello all,
I received the below message from SAP :
Dear Customer,
Sorry for a delay. I could not find a generic solution to correct it.
You would need deletion of that EBAN record thru a Z report. Can you
please ask your abap consultant to do this.
I am sorry but I could not give a better solution to you.
thanks and regards,
Sanjeev Shrivastava
Thanks to all for your support.

Similar Messages

  • MD04 inconsistency With Purchase order quantity

    Hi All,
    My scenario is :
    Purchase order quanty - 100 LB ( 200 kg).
    GR against this Pur. ord - 100 kg
    So now the Open PO qunatity is - 100 kgs. i can see the same in delivery tab of PO.
    but in MD04 for that PO quantity is showing it as 120 kg. (eccess of 20 kgs).
    Please suggest, why this Inconsistency in MD04.
    Regards,
    Prakash.B

    Hello
    POs are generally displayed on MD04 exactly as they are on the MM tables, therefore, I suggest you to check the quantity on the MM tables (EKPO, EKET, EKES...).
    The quantity displayed is the total quantity minus the quantity reduced for MRP (field DABMG).
    BR
    Caetano

  • 62: Scheduling: Master data inconsistent in MD04

    Dear all experts,
    I am new in PP. After i run MRP and i go to MD04 . Noticed that, 1 message is shown as below
    62: Scheduling: Master data inconsistent
    I have checked Routing and BOM and they are correct.
    I am using ECC 6
    Any solution on this issue?
    Thank you.

    Dear cijelew,
    I dont think there is problem with configuration setting,but it's with
    1. BOM validity date,BOM status.
    2.Check if any change numbers are used with release key and ensure the release key is set.
    3.Routing status,usage,validity and also
    check if BOM selection method is value 2 or 3(production version--->so check whether production version has been created
    properly,lot size,validity date,check where you have assigned the routing group and group counter whether is it against
    detailed planning,rate based planning or rough cut planning).This routing assignment should be against the correct planning
    level as per the configuraion setting made in OPU5,for the selection ID.
    Check and revert.
    Regards
    Mangalraj.S

  • PurOrd & ShipNt in MD04 duplicated (SNC confirmation)

    Dear experts,
    When a purchase order released to vendor, initial order acknowledgment is received through EDI, from SNC (ECC integrated with SNC). This order acknowledgement creates confirmation category "AB" in purchase order under 'Confirmation' tab in ECC. Resultant is the 'Shipping Notification' in ECC system which is suppose to replace the existing Purchase order in MD04 but instead the system is creating additional line item along with purchase order as 'Shipping Notification' and is a duplication of the receipt element in MD04.
    this is leading to a wrong planning in MD04. can any one suggest to resolve this issue?
    thanks
    Shreenidhi

    Hi Shreenidhi
    Generally, this is an inconsistency on the field DABMG
    Note 202875 provides a correction report to fix this issue.
    Notes below are corrections to be implemented to avoid this issue in the future:
    1979068
    MRP reduced quantity not updated for schedule lines
    1827920
    Inbound delivery creation failed to update MRP reduced qty
    1725906
    Inbound Delivery missing in PO confirmation (EKES)
    If the issue persists even after the implementation of these notes, you should open an OSS incident to the component MM-PUR-GF-CON.
    BR
    Caetano

  • MRP result Exception No., 61  "Scheduling: Customizing inconsistent"

    Dear All hi,
    After running MRP iam getting the exception message 61 as "Scheduling: Customizing inconsistent" in MD04 screen for FERT
    Please help

    Hi Shaiz,
    The Reason for getting Exceptiom message is "The scheduling data Maintained in the Customizing settings are not consistent for the material".
    May be Routing selction Id u have defined at OPPQ is  not matched with ur routing u have cerated at ca01(Like type,usage,status, valid date.).
    I hope u have "acitavated scheduling"   check Box and all other  at "para detailed schedu" and OPU5
    Please do scheduling for Planned order or convert to production order  & see the routing selection
    Regards
    Pradeep

  • Planned order missing in md04

    Hello,
    i did a confirmation for 100 quantites in APO ppds 10 days back, but i was not able to see the planned order in md04 tcode.
    But yesterday i could see the planned order in md04 tcode.
    Please let me know what would be the reason.
    Thanks in advance.
    karthi.

    Hi Karthi,
    The planned order got created 10 days back once the confirmation
    has happened which is the SAP standard functionality.
    But once it is created, it is not updated in md04 due to inconsistency.
    It would have got struck in inbound/outbound queues or it would have
    got displayed as a result of /sapapo/ccr run or upon clearing the
    queues.
    Regards
    R. Senthi Mareeswaran.

  • Multiple Entries in MD04

    Hello all,
    Need some advice on this.
    There exists multiple entries for a purchase order in the MD04 screen. One with element name 'POITEM' and the other one with 'Shipping Notification'. The acknowledgement (shipping notification) is received for the total Purchase Order quantity so obviously the POITEM should have been replaced with ShpgNt in the MD04 screen but it din't.
    Is this something to do with the rescheduling factor ?
    PS: Rescheduling Horizon value in OPPQ = 100 days.
    Regards,
    Rahul

    Hello Rahul
    When the shipping notification is created, the respective quantity should be updated on the field DABMG of the purchase order (table EKET).
    I made a quick notes search and I found several corrections for errors in the update of this field.
    1979068
    MRP reduced quantity not updated for schedule lines
    1860803
    Errors when processing confirmation documents in OLTP
    1827920
    Inbound delivery creation failed to update MRP reduced qty
    1877198
    Confirmation lines not update with PO Confirmation SOA
    Please implement this notes into your system, in order to avoid this kind of problem in the future.
    If there are POs wrongly displayed on transaction MD04 due to an inconsistency on field DABMG you should open an OSS incident to SAP under the component MM-PUR-GF-CON.
    BR
    Caetano

  • MD04 Isuue

    Hi Gurus
    I have a issue in which Planned order is seen in MD04, but when I GOTO MD13 Display Planned order error message is comming No Planned order exist
    Please help in this issue
    Regards
    Dhananjay

    Hi Rajesh
      Thanks for ur reply.
    The problem in my scenario is that our client is using SAP 4.6C  Version.
    This is a case of inconsistency with symptom as “Dependent requirements (DepReqs) exist in the Stock/Requirements list (MD04) for which no parent planned order exists”. These erroneous requirements cause the creation of unnecessary receipt elements during the planning run.
    I have found a OSS note 633119 for which I can give inthe solution to the client
    Thanks once again to all of u for ur efforts
    Regards
    Dhananjay

  • Qty difference between "mmbe" and "/afs/md04" transaction?

    Dear Gurus,
    When I am checking MMBE txn for a material, it is showing me 201 qty in Unrestricted stock(batch)..
    but when I am checking in "/afs/md04" txn, it is showing me 55 qty for Unrestricted stock(batch)..
    why is this discrepancy?
    pls help..

    I assume you are only checking for the "A" tab and comparing only the batch stock ( Stock type - C) , /AFS/MD04 is a stock and requirement list and MMBE is a stock report , if you have compared only the batch stock , might be you can run the report /AFS/SDRQ to check for inconsistency , Hope this helps...
    Arun

  • Delivery completed subcon POs & deleted PRs appearing in MD04

    Dear Experts,
    We have observed that, delivery completed subcontracting POs & deleted PRs are appearing in the stock requirement list (MD04).
    Could you please let me know if there is any OSS note to fix this?
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi,
    The report RM06C020 provided in SAP note 115899 should clear this inconsistency.
    Regards,
    Marcelo

  • Inconsistent MRP results

    Dear Sir / Madam
    Our users are continuously complaining that the MRP results are inconsistent. We are using MD61 transaction for entering Planned Independant Requirements. Planning run is executed using 1 3 1 3 1 parameters in md01. We are using multi level BOMs. Backflush indicator 1. Strategy group for BOM components is 40. Strategy group 11 is used for FG.
    KIndly suggest how to get consistent MRP results.
    Thanks in advance.

    Dear Sagar ,
    I would like to comment on the same issue that MRP  is one of the most  high level functionality in SAP specially in supply chain  , which is intregarted with core module like MM-SD-PP-PS-FICO etc .
    There are two different aspect which one should be very much aware about MRP : Excution of MRP  based on business requirement based on Demand situation  and Analysing the MRP result for decision making  as a planner ( Why did it happen -What needs to be done ) .There are bvarious exception messages MRP generates in MD04-Dyanamic result which indicates the reason and needs farther investigation to conclude on the result .
    Now in your case , as you have mentioned some of the activity . I would suggest the following :
    1.Re-check the MRP excution parameters selection  in MD01/MD02/MD03  ( Processing Key -NETCH , Create PR-2 OR 1 , MRP List -3 , Scheudle Line -3 , Planning Mode -1 for frist time , 3-Delete and re-create  )
    2.Check all the MRP1-MRP4 parameters .Specially for depedent compoenets , you must have BOM explosion and selection methods  is important and OPPQ-Carry all over all plant parameters -BOM explosion is very important .
    3.If you delete planned order , then open demand or current demand will be treated in MRP  and it will generate planned order based on the planning horzon or Process key seletion .
    4.Finally , it needs extensive training and understanding for user level to have clarity on MRP concept .
    Hope its helps
    Reagrds
    JH

  • Implementing BADI MD_ADD_COL_EZPS for MD04 custom column

    Hi there,
    I'm using BADI MD_ADD_COL_EZPS to display 3 new buttons and three new columns in MD04.
    For each line item that is displayed, the custom column is filled, after the button is hit -This works fine.
    My Question is:
    Is there any way to limit the value that is filled into the new column so that it only appears on the FIRST line item/row?
    (At the moment it is repeated all the way down the page - the new value is a material characteristic, so doesn't change, will always be the same for each line)
    I've looked at all the available structures/tables in the FILL_ADD_COLUMNS method of the BADI, and none seem suitable
    to determine the "first" row. (ie. something like the way SY-TABIX or SY-INDEX might be used)
    Any help appreciated.
    Thanks,
    David.

    Hi Shubhendu,
    in the method 'ACTIVATE_ADD_COLUMNS', you can set the flag EZ1_MODE to '1' to make the first column visible always. (it's been a while, but I think setting it to '2' makes it visible when the button is pressed.)
    Same applies to EZ2_MODE for second column, EZ3_MODE for third.
    look at the flags/parameters in this method, and also in FILL_ADD_COLUMNS, to fill the data.
    here you need to fill structure EMDEZX_USEX1 (for column 1) etc.
    The code is hit for each record displayed in MD04
    Hopefully this helps you.
    Regards,
    David

  • OPEN_INTERFACE_REJECTS- INCONSISTENT SUPPL SITE

    Payables Open Interface Import program is throwing INCONSISTENT SUPPL SITE, when a third party vendor site code and third party vendor site id is passed along with matching PO number for creating an invoice for third party vendor site.
    Can any one let me know, how to resolve this issue.
    Thanks in advance

    Hi,
    this could be due to passing values which are not correct for the vendor_site_id field ....do compare this transaction with other transactions that are imported successfully past, so that we can narrow down on the data which is different ...
    Reference:
    Expense Report Export Rejects Expense Reports With 'Supplier Site Id And Supplier Site Code Do Not Match' [ID 1408830.1]
    Regards,
    Ivruksha

  • MD04 release reject problem

    Sir in MD04 when i am converting planned order to production order i am getting following message also release is rejecting :-
    No valuation variant found for valuation area AMBA
    Message no. C6015
    Diagnosis
    The system could not find a valid valuation variant for valuation area AMBA.
    If the valutaion variant is not assigned to a valuation area, this will have the following effect on the valuation of the goods receipt of the finished product:
    u2022     If the price control indicator in the material master of the finished product is S, it will lead to price differences.
    u2022     If the price control indicator in the material master of the finished product is V, the goods receipt will be regarded as a delivery free of charge.
    Procedure
    Assign a valuation variant to valuation area AMBA in the configuration menu.
    Can u please tell me in which tcode i have to do customization to overcome above error message.
    I online wait.

    Dear,
    You must  check the maintenance of "Valuation variants for order  (Transaction OPK9)", which you can also access via the Customizing path "Production --> Production orders --> Integration --> Define valuation of goods received":it may be that an assignment valuation area - valuation variant is missing."
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

  • Planejamento de necessidades - MD04

    Prezados, bom dia.
    Estou com uma situação nova para mim, na tela de planejamento de materiais (MD04) está aparecendo uma necessidade para uma ordem de venda (OrdCli) tipo de necessidade 011 - Necessidade remessas.
    Porém não mostra qual a ordem e possivelmente é um erro/ problema pois a necessidade é de 2008.
    Já rodei o programa sdrqcr21 mas não corrigiu o problema.
    Alguem tem alguma sugestão do que pode estar acontecendo ?
    Tks,
    Rodrigo

    Olá Rodrigo,
    Por favor, veja se o grupo MRP está associado no mestre do material.
    Transação OVZI é onde o "requirement" é associado (nota 207942).
    Você também pode rodar o programa report ZSUMBD_INITIAL_FIND como explicado na nora 907053.
    Esper poder ter ajudado,
    Ruy Castro

Maybe you are looking for