Inconsistent SAP notes
Hi Experts,
There are few OSS notes which are identified as inconsistent by the client after upgradation to ECC 6.0
Could anyone please clarify what exactly it means by Inconsistent note.
Also,the inconsistent notes which are NOT applicable in ECC 6.0 as per SAP market place analysis, the status in SAP note browser (SNOTE) is maintained as 'Obsolete version implemented'.
For the inconsistent notes which are applicable also, the same status is maintained in snote.
Why is this so?
Please throw some light on this.
Thanks in advance!
Neha
When you go to transaction SNOTE, press the Information button (icon with letter I). Next press the 'hyperlink' to read about ' Implementation Status and Processing Status of SAP Notes'. I haven't seen anything about 'inconsistent notes', but there is something about ' Obsolete version implemented':
SAP corrected an SAP Note that
contains errors. Implement this SAP Note in your system again.
Correction, you can read about 'inconsistent notes':
If the implementation status changes afterwards so that it is no longer
compatible with the previous processing status (after you have imported
a Support Package, for example), the system indicates that the SAP Note
is inconsistent.
Edited by: Micky Oestreich on Jun 3, 2009 7:43 AM
Similar Messages
-
SAP System inconsistency for Inbound delivery / MIGO and a "sap note"
Hello Friends ,
After following SAP instruction on how to remove the inconsistency between posting GR through MIGO (Inv. mang.) and the reflection of the goods movement status in the inbound delivery document - done that using sap note 570991
the problem is that the system start behaving in a weird way throwing unjustified Error messages for any suggested goods receipt using MIGO with reference to inbound
for example after creating an inbound delivery document and trying to post it via migo , an error will pop up
- Inbound delivery storage location cannot be changed to here Message no. VLA316
the thing is i didn't even maintain any storage location entry up to that point and yet i cannot post any stock !!
also another error like
- Inbound delivery batch cannot be changed to *** here
which doesn't make any sense because there is not batches in the inbound document !!
i think this behavior is coming from the "Document Flow Update for Stock Postings" inbound indicator at the shipping parameter at client level customization
i need help on how to overcome this annoying SAP Bug/Problem specially i am in a post go live critical situationHi,
The messages you mentioned were introduced to avoid inconsistency between inbound delivery and IM, through the note: 1050944 - GR for inbound delivery using inventory mgmt as of ECC 6.00
If the messages are issued incorrectly, then you may check for SAP notes (I couldnt find anything relevant) or raise an OSS ticket to SAP.
Regards,
AKPT -
Hi,
I am trying to apply some SAP Notes in one of our BI systems. Currently we are on SP 18 of SAP_BW (release 700). The Notes that I am trying to apply are delivered in SP 19. So that part is okay.
The problem is that these Notes need some prerequisite notes to be downloaded and applied (SNOTE) which are delivered in SP 16 and SP 17. I checked the corrections delivered by the Prerequisite Note and they need to be implemented, i.e. in other words the corrections do not show up in the system even though they say that they have been delivered in the SP that we already are on.
Shouldn't the SP have modified these objects ? And this is happening not just with one Note. The version management for these objects shows the SAP version.
Does this sound wierd ? Any suggestions are welcome.
Thanks,
KunalHi Kunal,
Generally sometimes SNOTE advices to download some prerequisite notes, which were covered in current support package level. They will be downloaded but but only the main note and notes which were not covered in the current patch level are implemented, all other notes can be seen in not relevant status.
Kindly check again right correction instructions as it changes with the release. If you are above SP16 then changes will be present, I never saw anything like this before.
Regards
KVR -
How do remove commitment value in the PO ? any SAP note avl?
Hi,
Project (WBS)releated service PO (Account assignment category P and Item category D), in which SES,GR,IR have been completed for entire Project services for the year 2005,PO history also updatd for SES, GR,IR in the 2005 only.But Now system is showing still commitment value in the PO for the year 2009?.
Henece how do remove the inconsistency of the commitment value in the PO for the year 2009?. (i.e value is comming from COOI table entry).Is there any SAP NOTEs are available for this case?
Note:
But this case no PR has been refered in the PO. PO has been directly created, and PO QTY,Value changes have not been done after SES,GR,IR completion.
But still system commitment value is showing in the PO for the year 2009, so HOW do remove the value?
i am looking suitable answers.
Regards,
kumarHi,
Pre-requisites for a commitment update are:
o In transaction OKKP, the commitment management indicator must be
active for the given controlling area in the current fiscal year.
The controlling area is the highest organizational unit in Controlling,
however this area is missing from the accounting data of the PO.
o The accounting objects must be active for commitments:
- Work orders: The commitment management indicator must be set
in transaction KOT2 for the given order type.
- Cost centers: In transaction KS02, in register "Control", the
commitment update indicator must NOT be set.
- Projects: see note 47992
o In transaction CUNI, the unit of measurements used at item level
must be set to value based commitment.
Please check the following notes 152571, 634298, 459509 and
772206 carefully and also 165823.
Please check also if the "delivery complete" indicator is set in the PO item (see note 735404).
Usually for service POs the "Delivery completed" indicator will be
hidden and this indicator is fully controlled by the "final entry
sheet" indicator in ML81N. You must allow to set this indicator trough a field selection customizing for your PO item.
Regards,
Edit -
Hi,
I am facing an issue for Inconsistency in Delta extraction due to a Init Request Mismatch.
I found out an SAP Note 852443 for the same and it provided me with a workaround solution for the same.
But , this Issue is frequently reappearing for the same Data Source and I need to find a permanent fix/solution for the same.
Kindly help me in this.
Thanks,
VimarshHi.....
I have gone through the SAP note......what I have understood I will explain you....
1) You need to compare the Init request (ex : REQU_44H2K09BTG5799G2JXCORI1O5) in both BW and R/3 side....both should be same......
In the R/3 side the value of the field : RNR of the table :RSSDLINIT should match with the value of the field : INITRNR of the table ROOSPRMSC in the R/3 side.....
2) If there are NO entries in the RSSDLINIT table in BW, use transaction RSA7 to delete the delta queue for this DataSource/BW application combination in the source system (OLTP).........this step is very simple.......
3) But the confusion arrise when value is there in the table RSSDLINIT in the BW side.......then check the same Request number in the table ROOSPRMSF and ROOSPRMSC tables with the INITRNR field.
If, in the ROOSPRMSF and ROOSPRMSC tables for your DataSource source system combination, there are more entries with different INITRNR numbers...............it means if the value doesn't match or multiple values are there then also same solution ...........i.e...........use transaction RSA7 in an OLTP source system to delete all entries ...............then use the Program : RSSM_OLTP_INIT_DELTA_UPDATE and then delete all init selections in the 'Scheduler/Init selections in the source system' menu in the InfoPackage.......
4) But if it is a DataMart datasource that is a Export Dtasource then the solution is different.........starting with 8
But I don't want to confuse you.........first check whether is is a Export Datasource or not.....
Regards,
Debjani..... -
Hi SD Consultants,
Can someone explain me about SAP Note Nr. 683745. We applied this in 4.7 but now we are upgrading to ECC 6.0. Now we want to analyse if this note is required in ECC 6.0. I'm not sure if this is SD specific or FM specific. If someone can explain what this note does, that would be of great help.
SAP Note Nr. 683745 03.10.2008 Page 1
Number 683745
Version 0014
Processor BALAJI
Processing Status In Process
Implement. Status Completely implemented
Language EN
Short Text Utility programs for SD-FM integration
Component PSM-FM-UP-CM
Long Text
Symptom
You discover that the net value in some sales orders does not agree with
amounts in Funds Management (FM).
Other terms
VA01, VA02, VA03, Sales Distribution (SD)
Reason and Prerequisites
Reason: Inconsistency between SD and FM.
Solution
1. Create executable programs ZZ_CHECK_SDFM, ZZ_SIMULATE_VA02 and
ZZ_CORRECT_DEL_SDFM under Financial Accounting (FI) in a customer
development class beginning with Y or Z, with the titles:
ZZ_CHECK_SDFM Check of sales order inconsistencies in FM
ZZ_SIMULATE_VA02 Update of sales orders in Funds Management
ZZ_CORRECT_DEL_SDFM FM correction of deleted sales order lines
a) After you have saved and activated programs, you can take over
text symbols in English from the programs as follows:
- SE38 -> Text elements -> Change (CTRL+F1) -> Utilities ->
Adjust -> Textsymbols -> Edit -> Insert text symbols.
Alternatively, you can copy and paste the text from the following lines:
Text symbols for program ZZ_CHECK_SDFM
Sym Text dLen mLen
010 Doc. no. Line 15 15
011 Amount in SD Amount in FM 40 40
020 Line deleted in SD 18 18
030 Net values of selected sales orders in FM are correct 53 53
040 Missing line in FM 18 18
Text symbols for program ZZ_SIMULATE_VA02
Sym Text dLen mLen
Page 2
010 SD order was updated. 21 30
Text symbols for program ZZ_CORRECT_DEL_SDFM
Sym Text dLen mLen
010 Doc. no. Item 15 16
020 Amount in SD Amount in FM 34 34
030 Line deleted in SD 18 18
040 Net values of selected sales orders in FM are correct. 53 53
050 AccAs AmTp Year FM Date Period Amount 49 49
060 Correction is not possible with selected date. 46 46
100 Date/period for corrections 27 27
b) Then choose the "Selection texts" tab and take all possible
parameters from the dictionary by checking the "Dictionary ref."
box.
2. Now you can run ZZ_CHECK_SDFM to identify inconsistencies in SD-FM
integration. The billing amounts are not considered by this program
ZZ_CHECK_SDFM.
3. To correct any inconsistencies found, you can access the sales order
using transaction VA02.
a) In the most cases, if you change and remove a change in VA02 and
then
b) save, it will correct FM amount.
c) For larger numbers of incorrect sales orders, you can use program
ZZ_SIMULATE_VA02. To run ZZ_SIMULATE_VA02 you will need to
implement for EA-PS 1.10-2.00 the correction instructions
0120031469-347128 or 0120031469-347129.
d) You will need to change 2 methodes: TRANSACTION_INIT and
SAVE_DOCUMENT using the transaction SE19 and implementation
IM_BADI_SD_SALES_FM.
4. Inconsistencies that cannot be corrected using VA02 or
ZZ_SIMULATE_VA02 will be most likely where a sale order line item was
deleted and the deletion was not recorded in FM. In such cases, you
will notice the text: 'Line deleted in SD' in the log of
ZZ_CHECK_SDFM. Such lines can be corrected with 3 ways:
a) You need to create the deleted line again, save the sales order,
and then delete the line again. This will only have the desired
effect if sales order deletion is working correctly in FM. This
manual correction has an advantage that Budgetary Ledger documents
are created as well.
b) The second way is required for sales order lines which were
carried forward in FM to the next fiscal year and which are not
possible to recreate again, because sales order does not exist or
automatic line item numbering does not allow to type a certain
number. In such case you will need to run program
ZZ_CORRECT_DEL_SDFM in order to close the open amount in FM. If
you use Budgetary Ledger (B/L), then you will need to run
Page 3
budgetary ledger reconciliation program RFFMFG_BL_CORR for
corrected sales order document in order to create B/L document for
the FM closing amount.
c) The third way can be used only for sales orders, which were not
carried forward yet. It is suitable for sales orders which were
completely deleted in SD and the deletion was not recorded in FM.
In such case you can delete FM line items using deletion program
RFFMDLOI. If you have Period Based Encumbrance Tracking (PBET)
active, you need to use the modified version, ZFFMDLOI, provided
in note 577860. If you also use Budgetary Ledger (BL), this third
way is not suitable for you unless you are experienced with B/L
reversal program ZRFFMBLREVERSEDOC (provided by note 683707) and
locating the B/L document based on the relation of fields
FMIOI-TRANR and BKPF-XBLNR.
Valid Releases
IS-Public Sector
462
SAP R/3 Enterprise AddOn Public Sector
110
200
500
ISPSADIN - Merge IS-PS & DI
10A
Thanks,
RajbansHi ,
SAP note 1810084 - SAPBWNews NW BW 7.30 ABAP SP10
This note contains the SAPBWNews for ABAP Support Package 10 for BW release 7.3
It provides a list of all notes describing the corrections or enhancements in Support Package 10.This note will be updated when other notes are added.
To customers who power their BW with SAP HANA, SAP strongly recommends to apply the latest available SAP HANA revision.
AS there is no correction instruction in this note, this cannot be implemented using SNOTE.
You need to refer to all the SAP notes mentioned in this note and apply relevant notes.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Deepak Kori -
hi all,
please let me know a small thing...i have to apply an OSS note (214604) for inbound delivery workaround. the note involves creation of some z entries in some tables and some source code modification.
Please let me know if i use SNOTE for applying the note, will it create the table entries itself or will the entries have to be created manually first and then the note be applied for source code modifications.
ASAP plz....:-)
regards,
PJHi Surajit,
Please make sure the below mentioned Notes are implemented in the sequence given in order to get the changes related to Budget 2011
SAP Note 1558475- Amendments to IT calculation notified undercircular:08/2010.
SAP Note 1572614- Tax calculations inconsistent for emp. without a vaild PAN.
SAP Note 1575366- HINCALC0:Tax calculation inconsistent in case of invalid PAN.
SAP Note 1568264- Budget Changes 2011
Go through the text of the Notes for the pre-requisites and manual steps you need to perform.
Hope this help
Sarah -
Hi
This note implements a BADI so we can modify the log files of the SNP Opimizer.this Badi is for for adapting input log and results log of the optimizer.
When the Badi is active, a message is displayed in the input log, results log and message log.
but the above note is already implemented in our system,but user unable to change logs according to business need,?
basically this note helps to define user constraints in the log
Thanks
PoornaHi Surajit,
Please make sure the below mentioned Notes are implemented in the sequence given in order to get the changes related to Budget 2011
SAP Note 1558475- Amendments to IT calculation notified undercircular:08/2010.
SAP Note 1572614- Tax calculations inconsistent for emp. without a vaild PAN.
SAP Note 1575366- HINCALC0:Tax calculation inconsistent in case of invalid PAN.
SAP Note 1568264- Budget Changes 2011
Go through the text of the Notes for the pre-requisites and manual steps you need to perform.
Hope this help
Sarah -
How to revert back a SAP NOTE? Dump- Field symbol has not yet been assigned
Hi Experts,
We r getting dump(cause: Field symbol has not yet been assigned) in production for ABUMN tx, so, when debugged, it came to know that, the Field symbol is coming from REUSE_ALV_LIST_DISPLAY!!
So, for some reason the system message text is not getting output in ALV-->Dump!!
So, found a NOTE causing this problem!!
So, pls. let me know that, How to revert back this/any SAP NOTE? pls. in detail steps wise!!
thanq
Edited by: Srinivas on Jan 24, 2008 4:32 PMHi
In SNOTE tcode, select the Note that you implemented and click on 'RESET SAP Note Implementation'
shylesh -
Sap note 1507799 - Sec 80CCD - pension contribution notified by central gov
Dear
I have applied the sap note 1507799 - Sec 80CCD - pension contribution notified by central govt. and have done the necessary manual config steps as mentioned in the sap note.
When i am trying to check this pension contribution notified by central govt item in IT0585 and IT 0586.
i am unable to get this item.
Regards
VishHi ,
First do the manual changes & then apply the note. You will get "Contribution to pension scheme of Central Goverment" this option in IT 585
Regards,
Mahesh -
Sap notes for 103 movement type and 105 movement types in sap
Hi all,
Please let me know if there are any sap notes for 103 movement type and 105 movement type in sap as soon as possible
points will be awarded.
thanking u in advance,
srinivas.There are many SAP notes related to these movement types e.g 514609,750836,
533833, 808029, 317823,etc.
You can search them at http://service.sap.com
Regards,
Amit -
Doubt in Downloading Sap notes in SNOTE Transaction
Hi Experts,
I want to download the sap note (442831) in my developement system. For that i am using the Tcode SNOTE here i used Goto-->Download Sap Note. I gave my sap note number in that window, then i executed. after few minites its saying downloaded.
After downloading i searched the notenumber in that list but its not displaying.
Why its happening? Plz guide this any otherway is there or i did any wrong things over this??
Plz plz its urgent. Point will be sure.
Thnx,
MohanaHI,
Once you download the note it will be in NEW list click on it and expand then search the same
if you want to apply the patch then implement the note and finally change the processing status to completed
Regards
Shiva -
Date option in stock reversing program(SAP NOTE 175842)
Hi Gurus,
We have prepared a program with SAP NOTE 175842 for reversing stock posting.My client has done GR in march 09 and quality peoples have posted to unrestricted stock in same month.Now because of some reason stores person want to cancel GR. So we have reversed the posting for the lot in April using the programme.Now when stores person try to cancel GR in month of march system is giving error "Deficit of SL St.in QI prev. 14.800 MT ".Because we have reversed the posting from unrestricted to quality in april and we are trying to cancel GR in March system is giving above error.
Is there any settings such that in stock reversing program we can enter the date, so that on a particular date we can reverse the stock.Because in current situation we can enter lot no. only or is there any other solution to overcome this situation
Regards
Amithi amit
Yes system will not allow you to cancel GR for March when Reversal stock posting was done in April.
Because it will consider the status of stock when GR was made.
Which movement type you have used for reversal From Unrestricted to Quality.
Was it the activation of 08 & then 322.
If it is so then cancellation of GR will not take place through original GR document(as it is in unrestricted), It will give error msg if you give reference of same.
Even GR can not be cancelled based on 08 inspection lot as 08 is not wrt PO.
Just asuggetion explore User Exit
QEVA0008 Usage decision: Customer function key (e.g. to cancel UD)
Sujit -
What is the new sap note for Ptax slabs of FY 2011-12.
Dear Experts,
we are currently using ECC 6.0, release 604, patch level 0035 and support package SAPKE60435. professional tax slabs not updated in table V_T7INP4.
what is the new sap note for Ptax slabs of FY 2011-12.Hi,
The Profession Tax tables T7INP3 & T7INP4 are customizing tables in which the entries are to be modified. SAP provides the initial entries and, if there is any change in slab rates, then you would need to update these slabs manually.
Please delimit the slab code in table T7INP3 and then create a new slab code entry from the date of delimition for the new rates in table T7INP4.
Regards,
Nishtha -
Is it possible to force the implementation of a SAP note?
Hi guys,
I am installing SAP CPM, software components CPD 1.0 and PICM 1.0. During the SAINT installation, I hit an error for both components in the ABAP Generation Phase. I have found two notes with automatic corrections (1843317 and 2040519) to fix the errors.
However, when attempting to implement both notes through SNOTE, it shows them as "Cannot be implemented". I am assuming this is because the software components are not fully installed yet.
I know that I can get the correction instructions from each note and manually put them in, but one of the notes has 15+ corrections. Not exactly how I want to spend my day.
Is there a way to force SNOTE to implement a note that is listed as "cannot be implemented"? If not, does anyone have a better way to get the corrections applied besides doing each one manually?
Thanks!
-JaysonHi,
Here i would recommend to go for correction instruction instead of searching force implementation of SAP Notes as notes are used to fix bugs under some specific SAP standard codes and affects specific programs even and only recommended if support package still to be provided by SAP.
Also need to check for the supported releases under SAP notes for performing corrections (strictly based or relevant for mentioned releases.)
Hope you will understand and will try to avoid any issues by opting any force methods to implement the SAP Notes.
Regards,
Gaurav
Maybe you are looking for
-
Hi All, When I a am Extracting data from R/3 to BW. short damp happend in BW side as Runtime Error DBIF_RSQL_SQL_ERROR Except. CX_SY_OPEN_SQL_DB please any one help me and let me know the reasons why it happens short du
-
I can't change my internet certificate check to "off". It seems it is locked to "on", so everytime i try to surf the internet i get popups with several certificate i need to accept to go to nesxt page. I want to set the internet certificate check to
-
Easy way for group moving multiple rows to insert under new row?
Hi All. I have been trying to find a way that will let me move - say - 20 rows (#'s 105 - 125) each with 15 columns to a space that fits under an existing column that may be further up - say - row 5. I would like to do this in a way that does not req
-
How to I achieve great voice over audio for a macbook pro
Should I just plug in a mic? Do I need a external soundcard like the "apogee one" or is a USB mic a better solution? I also play the guitar so maby one day I would like to record some guitar to, but in logic or similar.
-
I have forgotten my iphone encryption password
How do i change it?