Incorporating Quality check in Repetitive scenario

Hi PP Experts,
I have a requirement which is as follows for Repetitive scenario
I need to do Quality check (for total carbonate (TC) value -- say will be in decimal)on one of the semifinished material and based on that result the operator controls the input temperature to the machine (say for example if total TC is 10 then the temp is say 110 deg). The requirement is that the TC for the semifinished material shud be captured and that information will be used by the operator in the control room.
Im trying to do this throug inspection character in the rate routing.
My Queries are
1. Do i woork with inspection lot?
2. How do I work with inspection characters?
Any suggestion as to how it shud be done wud be rewarded.
Thanks in advance
Vinod

Vinod,
You need to assign the insp characterisc TC in the routing operation.
Enter the control key as PP04 for the operation in routing CA22.
Select the operation and go to Insp charac. Enter the MIC in this.
When you create Insp lot through MSPR the insp lot will have this charc.
Hope now it is clear. Reward points and clos this thread.
rgds
ram

Similar Messages

Quality check in Repetitive Scenario

Hi Experts,
I have a requirement which is as follows for Repetitive scenario
I need to do Quality check (for total carbonate (TC) value -- say will be in decimal)on one of the semifinished material and based on that result the operator controls the input temperature to the machine (say for example if total TC is 10 then the temp is say 110 deg). The requirement is that the TC for the semifinished material shud be captured and that information will be used by the operator in the control room.
Im trying to do this throug inspection character in the rate routing.
My Queries are
1. Do i woork with inspection lot?
2. How do I work with inspection characters?
Any suggestion as to how it shud be done wud be rewarded.
Thanks in advance
Vinod

Vinod,
You need to assign the insp characterisc TC in the routing operation.
Enter the control key as PP04 for the operation in routing CA22.
Select the operation and go to Insp charac. Enter the MIC in this.
When you create Insp lot through MSPR the insp lot will have this charc.
Hope now it is clear. Reward points and clos this thread.
rgds
ram

How to do data quality check on XI?

Hi XI guru,
I am working on a project, our architect want XI to perform some data quality check to make sure the message contains correct data in future processing. Is there any existing solution or walk arround for XI to perform the data quality check?
For example: if field A and field B is not exist, then XI need to send a email to remind someone who support this interface.
For this kind of scenario, is that possible for XI to handle? What's the best option for XI?

Hi,
check all the condition in UDF and based on the condition result raise an alert.
follow below steps:
Michal Krawczyk
The specified item was not found.
Configuration steps are: go to transaction ALRTCATDEF
1) Define Alert Category
2) Create container elements which are used for holding an error messages.
3) Recipient Determination.
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/wiki?path=/display/xi/alert%2bconfiguration%2bin%2bxi
Alert can be triggered in different ways.
1) Triggering by Calling a Function Module Directly.
Triggering XI Alerts from a User Defined Function
chirag

Quality Check at customer location

Hi experts,
I am working for dairy industry and here one scenario is that my client sends processed milk in tankers to other dairies, before that quality check is done, FAT & SNF is measured and according to fat & snf the rates of milk to customer is done, that milk reaches to the customer on that day or second day, then at the customer site again quality of that milk is measured in terms of fat & snf, and it may or may not vary, but if quality is differed then it is noted down and that customer sends that quality on document and then according to the quality found at customer location the billing to the customer is done on this basis, so my client requirement is that he wants the quality check done at customer location should get fetch in POD (T-code LOPOD) so that their manual entry is minimized, whats the solution.
Regards,
Karad D D

Hi,
Activate the Delivery Inspection type 10. Create Quality Info record - customer. In Info Record , make the check for Quality Inspection after Delivery.
With Thos setting material can be delivered for the delivery note without Making Inspection, but lot will generate. Make the Inspection at Customer Site and Do the RR for that Lot.
Reagrds,
Neeraj

Implementation of Oracle Coding Standards and Code Quality Checks

I wanted to implement a list of coding standards and code quality checks for my oracle packages,functions,views,tableetc .
for example
All variables with number datatype should start with N_ and charcter type with C_ in all my tables & views definition.
This can be identified during peer review & can be corrected, but i think this is a repeated process which i don want to burden the developers rather i wanted a tool which does all these kind of checks which can be automated.
Is there any tool which does this operation or can someone give me a little idea how can i automate these stuffs bu creating a generic oracle procedure which can run through all the tables,views and generate a error report for those which are deviating from the standards.
Thus we can reduce the manual effort spent on peer review, please suggest.
thanks in advance

maru wrote:
I wanted to implement a list of coding standards and code quality checks for my oracle packages,functions,views,tableetc .
for example
All variables with number datatype should start with N_ and charcter type with C_ in all my tables & views definition.Hungarian notation is dead. It has no place in modern programming languages. Has no place in PL/SQL. Anit ain't just me saying that.
+"Encoding the type of a function into the name (so-called Hungarian notation) is brain damaged—the compiler knows the types anyway and can check those, and it only confuses the programmer."+
Linus Torvalds
+"No I don't recommend 'Hungarian'. I regard 'Hungarian' (embedding an abbreviated version of a type in a variable name) a technique that can be useful in untyped languages, but is completely unsuitable for a language that supports generic programming and object-oriented programming—both of which emphasize selection of operations based on the type an arguments (known to the language or to the run-time support). In this case, 'building the type of an object into names' simply complicates and minimizes abstraction."+
Bjarne Stroustrup
2) Conditional Statements
IF (x = 1) --> Wrong
IF ((x = 1) AND (y = 2)) --> wrong
IF x = 1 AND y = 2 --> RightIdiotic rules. The simple rule should be readability of code. Not how many brackets to use, and when not to use brackets. Minute standards like detracts from designing and writing proper code, fast and efficiently.
There are many more rules (which is specific to ur application) which can be incorporated in the tool, there by giving consistency ,readability and easy to maintain for the developers.Bull. The more rules there are, the more difficult it becomes for programmers to write code. As it is no longer about writing readable and flexible and performing code - it is about double checking every single statement line against a huge list of rules about do's and dont's. It is not about getting the programmer focusing on solving the problem - it is about distracting the programmer with a complex and large rule list of how the code should look like.
Sorry - but this rubs me the wrong way. In that environment, I would be the first to tell you to shove your "+many more rules+".
I've developed systems in over a dozen languages over the years. I've seen all kinds of standards. The standards that work are those that are short, simple and sensible. Hungarian notation is not sensible. Writing reserved words in uppercase is not sensible. Dictating how brackets should be used is not sensible.
What is sensible is using the de facto naming standards in use today - as per .Net Guidelines for Names (MSDN) and Code Conventions for the Java Programming Language.
What is sensible is providing guidelines like bulk collection needs to be justified (not possible using SQL only) and use the limit clause to manage memory spend on the collection variable. Or how packages need to be used to modularise code, providing a public interface and private implementation.
Standards are about creating a sensible and easy-to-use framework for writing code. It is not about creating a list of a 1001 rules that a developer needs to remember and adhere to, as if the developer is now part of some weird religious sect that has rules for every single aspect of human behaviour.

Quality Check before every Delivery

Dear All,
I have a requirement as follows:
This is a Make to Stock scenario where the material is produced, a Quality check is performed and placed in finished goods storage location. After 3-4months of production when a Sales order is due for delivery, the client wants to perform a Quality check before every delivery is dispatched.
Can you please suggest me how this can be mapped in SAP?

Hello ,
please check this link
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_05/helpdata/EN/7b/acae87475331479287bcb94b25072d/frameset.htm
venkataswamy

Data quality check or automation

Apart from passing the report to the user for testing are there ways the process can be automated for a data quality check and how?
Thanks.

Hi Dre01,
According to your description, you want to check the report data quality. Right?
In Reporting Services, the only way to check the report data is viewing the report. So for your requirement, if you want to make this data processing automatically. We suggest to create subscription, it will process the data automatically based
on the schedule and you will get the subscription of report to check if it shows data properly.
Reference:
Create, Modify, and Delete Standard Subscriptions (Reporting Services in Native Mode)
If you have any question, please feel free to ask.
Best Regards,
Simon Hou

Check on repetition of employee names during hiring

Hi All,
Could anyone please guide me on how to keep a check on repetition of employee names during the hiring process? i.e whenever the administrator enters a person's name during personal data maintenance, it should throw an error if the same name already exists in the employee database. and the system should prompt a number to be prefixed after the name to make it unique.
I suppose this is to be done with an ABAP development... but could anybody guide me as to what tables etc to refer to atleast??

Hi,
You can achieve this by using the user exits -EXIT_SAPFP50M_001 and EXIT_SAPFP50M_002.
In this exit,you can compare with the table(pa0002) name .If exits,throw an information message and pass prefered name to the screen.
Reward points if Helpful.
Regards,
Manoj.

Calculation of WIP in repetitive scenario - urgent

Hi,
We are using Product Cost Collector (Product cost by period) to capture the cost.
I have the following queries.
We are using standard REM profile, Target cost,
1. If I calculate WIP at the month end in a scenario where no GR has been made (No final good produced) will system calculate the WIP based on consumption (material and activities) for that month.
In this scenario month end settlement should post the WIP values also.
2. Will system calculate the Target cost for the PCC if no GR is made for that month?
3. If settlement is made will there be an entry posted for the materials and activities consumed?
4. How SAP determines WIP in a repetitive scenario, in the following cases.
Scenario 1 - Month end confirmtaion with GR (Goods delievered)
Scenario 2 - Month end calculation with GR , only GI has happened and no final product has been delivered, and my Cost captured thru GR wil be equivalent to the WIP.
Please help me to understand the process.

http://help.sap.com/saphelp_470/helpdata/en/90/ba6671446711d189420000e829fbbd/content.htm

Transport Quality Check-How to design

Dear All,
During transport request migration from SAP development system to SAP production system, we are facing following challenges.
1. Parallel developments
Change1 on ObjectA is done on development and migrated to test. Another change2 on same objectA is done by other developer and he also send it to test. Change1 is overwritten and testing can not be performed.
2. Changes moved to production for critical business objects during a time when critical business activities are scheduled.The timing of change migration to production was wrong.Developer and tester were not aware of that critical business activity.
I request your suggestion on how quality check can be in place to avoid above situations.
What is the process following in your organization/client/project?
Thankful to All in Adv.
Brgds,
Pankaj

Hi Pankaj,
This is not a technical issue.
Only thing you can do is to make the developers aware of production impact.
may be remove their rights to perform imports in production... so that a system admin can control it.
You will have to figure out.. approval level in your organization to transport anything in production.
Also a fixed time to be decided for transport, may be weekly once.
Also for emergency transports, you must have a higher level of approval procedure in place.
Regards
Gaurav Desai

Suggestions about the best tool for quality check for an ADF application

Hi All,
I need a few suggestions about the best tool for quality check in our ADF applicaiton.
ours is a small size WebCenter Portal application which neither uses any task flows nor consumes any portlets.
It has many jspx pages that use ADF components like table etc, consume web services using web service clients, and has some java classes.
We have come across below option to implement the code quality tools.
1. Jdeveloper inbuilt Staus option in View tab
2. PMD extension for Jdeveloper
3. Red Samurai
Few more suggestions or best practices would be really helpful.
Thanks,
Usha

Some general ADF / Webcenter coding standards -
http://umeshagarwal24.blogspot.com/2012/06/adf-coding-standards-check-points.html
You can use JAudit as well as mentioned in the blog.

Quality checks at level of vendor's plant (in GR)

Dear all,
we have a problem with quality checks during GR. Our client wants to be able to check the his vendors at plant level.
The dynamic modification rules have to consider not only the vendor but also the plant of the vendors from wich the materials were send.
How can I do it?
Thanks

Please delete this duplicate thread. There is already one thread for same query.

Quality check for Pipeline Material

Hi MM Guru's
Is it possible to do quality check for Pipeline Material?
If yes what is the process.
Thank you
Venu

you can create a manual inspection lot, analyze a sample and record the results.
but you cannot have a quality stock and do not do a transfer posting from quality to unrestricted or quality to blocked.
There a many chemicals that are transported via pipeline and managed as pipleline materials, either supplied by a supplier in the neighborhood or even cross country. And it is needed that you want do quality checks on certain materials before you use them.
Search the QM forum, you may find some discussions.

Quality check in FCP

Hi all,
I need a plug-in to FCP that can do tech checks...like look for black/colour bars/ high audio levels/high video levels etc. Can someone suggest me some third party plugin for Quality check of video / audio or any other solution for Quality check(technical check ) of .mov before sending it for broadcast .
thanks

FCP already contains both these functions:
Mark > Audio Peaks > Mark
View > Range Check

Customer returns to quality check storage loc............

hi, sap gurus,
suppose some customer X has returned some 100 goods from 1000 he purchased and then these goods has to be transferred to different storage location because there quality check happens and after 72 hours or so then the tested goods will be transferred to goods for un restricted use and
how to do this configuration in SAP r/3.
plz help me onthis.
regards,
sd consultant

If your requirement is something like this :
Goods coming in - After GR is put - Goods should be posted to Quality Inspection not to Unrestricted Use.
If its so,
Goto Material Master
Goto Quality Management Tab Page
Activate the "Post to insp. Stock"
Your requirement should be fulfilled.
Thanks
Vaidee
Edited by: Vaidee on Aug 27, 2008 8:20 AM

Incorporating Quality check in Repetitive scenario

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for