Incorrect Alerts CPU Time and Average Response Time

BUG
My Alert on Web app is consistently behaving incorrectly.
If I set an alert to monitor CPU Time at threshold 1.5 seconds, it's actually set to 1.5 milliseconds even though the graph shows a dotted red line at 1.5 seconds. The alert will trigger at 1.5 milliseconds threshold. So, instead, I have to set threshold
to 1500 seconds - the graph is completely useless showing a red dotted line at ~24 mins but the alert does then go off when CPU time goes above 1500 ms (aka 1.5 seconds).
The original portal alert seems to be fine - this problem is on new portal only. Unaffected by browser type - all browsers do the same thing (Just has to be said before someone asks).
This seems to apply to all metrics using seconds (Average Response Time acts in the same way)

Hii...
Am sure you are much aware " Components Response Time spectrum"
########Analyzing Performance Problems#################
--High wait time: Insufficient number of free work processes
--High roll-wait time: Communication problem with GUI, external system,
or large amount of data requested
--High load and generation time: SAP buffers (Program, CUA or Screen)
too small
--High database request time: CPU/memory bottleneck on database server;
communication problem with database server, expensive SQL statements,
database locks, missing indexes, missing statistics or small database buffer(s)
--High CPU time: Expensive ABAP processing, for example, processing
large tables; inefficient programming
--Processing time more than twice CPU time: CPU bottlenecks
If time aloows look at
Note 0000008963 - Definition of SAP response time/processing time/CPU time
Rgds

Similar Messages

CPU bits and Moniter response times

Do the G5 iMacs have a 32 bit CPU or 64 bit?
What is the response time for the monitors on the G5s?
Answers would be great! Thank you.
super duper di duper scooper pooper in your face Windows XP

Welcome to the discussions!
All G5s are full 64-bit CPUs.
As far as pixel response time goes, that is not something that Apple has ever published, but AFAIK the iMacs use the same LG.Philips LM201W01 panel as the 20" Cinema display. Depending on who you believe, that panel has either a 16 or 12 ms response time.
Apple uses S-IPS panels for their superior color matching capabilities due to the fact that so many people in creative careers use Macs. Response time is not as important as color accuracy.
The TN panels used by many manufacturers have a much better response time and contrast ratio, but are clearly not as good as S-IPS for color.

Macbook Pro Boot time and general response time slow.

I'm running 10.9 Mavericks.
Yesterday as I was doing my every day activites I realized randomly my macbook pro began preforming extremely poorly.
My problems:
Boot time now takes 2-3 minutes.
Applications take 2-3 minutes to open.
Applications will say they're open sometimes but will not display.
Applications will take several tries to quit.
Applications, especially Safari, will randomly crash.
Everything is slower and takes a while to do, even opening a simple folder will take a minute.
The things I have tried:
I ran a Hardware test and the results showed it is not a hardware problem.
I have reset the SMC and PRAM and the problems still occur.
I have Verified and repaired the Disk/Permissions, however it seems to stop mid-way through (after about an hour).
I can't seem to figure out what's wrong with it. I can re-install the OS but with my internet it is estimated to take 8 hours.
Any suggestions?

Your disk may be failing. Do not attempt to resintall the OS until your disk is healthy.
Backup your data immediately:
Before proceeding you should make sure you have a current backup. If it has been getting slower over time your disk could be a failing slowly. SATA drives have two retry modes: short and long. They can continue operating as read errors are increasing. The long retry cycle is very long and can cause significant performance degradation. If it has started long retries then it is likely to get worse and eventually fail. SSDs also have a failure mode where the fail slowly.
Time Machine Basics: http://support.apple.com/kb/ht1427
Most commonly used backup methods:
https://discussions.apple.com/docs/DOC-3045
Methodology to protect your data. Backups vs. Archives. Long-term data protection:
https://discussions.apple.com/docs/DOC-6031
Make a Genius Bar reservation http://www.apple.com/retail/geniusbar/ .
or find an Apple Authorized Service Provider https://locate.apple.com/country
If it is a failing disk, consider an upgrade to a 1 TB, 7200 RPM disk. Check out a one terabyte HGST 7K1000 7200 rpm, SATA III drive from OWC or consider an SSD.

Ping success rate against Average response time

Hi All,
I find this very weird, while I am pinging some host, and the host's Success Rate is for example below 40% while the average response time remains at around 5ms.Why Weird? Shouldn't it raise the Average response time if there were timeouts ( Success Rate ) on the proccess?
This is causing problems to me, because I have implemented a script which changes routing between two different ISP's based on Success rate and Average Response Time.
It compares both of the ISP's result to make the change, here is a piece of code which shows exactly what I want to do, maybe there's a better way to do it, if you have any ideas please share.
if {$srate_isp1 >= $srate_isp2 && $avrg_isp1 <= $avrg_isp2
:Make the change
else
Do nothing
The problem with this is, if Success rate is below 40% and is worse than Success rate of ISP2 , and the average time remains better for ISP1, it will not make the change.I was expecting average response time to raise if the success rate is bad, but sadly enough its not going to happen.
Btw, the script is in TCL, and I would share the whole script but its too long.If you need more bits of it, i'll share.
Thanks,
Uran

This happens when wifi device in your computer re-scans wifi networks in background.
To reproduce this, run ping to any host and then click on wifi icon to display list of available networks - and you will see ping lag.
This can be disabled in registry - search for ScanWhenAssociated parameter inside HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM and set it to 0 everywhere (typically 2 occurences). After it restart wifi driver or computer.

"Windows 8 using 100% of HDD with high average response times and low read/write speed"

Turns out this is a fairly well known windows 8.1 issue that has been plaguing users since at least 2013 and there is no one simple fix, so it may not be *entirely* hp's fault; but I've had two of these laptops, both the same model, the first one needing to be returned and exchanged for an entirely unrelated issue (hardware failure: ethernet port nonfunctional with lights stuck on). Both are refurbished. Both have been extreemly slow and unresponsive even compared to a lesser Brazos powered laptop I had before, but I've only recently decided to investigate why.
So if there is something HP specific going on here, I hope there is one simple fix. My average response time has gone up as far as well over a minute (>60,000ms), so I may be an outlier case here compared to the typical windows 8.1 hardrive responsiveness/bandwidth problem.
Edit: there is a case with another HP pavilion laptop (intel powered though, so it may be an intel storage driver issue described in the first link) being much, much worse.
This question was solved.
View Solution.

Guess what just now happened again
So using DISM did _not_ fix it.

Average response times for VA01 and VA02 transactions

Hi,
we have some users complaining about response times, more specific for VA01 and VA02 transactions. We would like to compare our average response times to those of other companies in order to get an idea of what is acceptable to most companies. If you are willing to contribute, can you please send a few hours of STAD data (only for VA01 and VA02 transactions) of an average working day? Perhaps you can download the data into a spreadsheet and mail the zipped file to my account Many thanks.
Best regards,
Guido Van Leuven

Hi,
This is not the issue. We are investigating everything possible to improve our response times and we believe that that these are ok as well. We just want to build a case where we can prove that our response times are not worse than those at other companies and that we can do only by comparing those statistics.
Best regards,
Guido Van Leuven

Average Response Time for Reports

Hi Gurus,
I am using OAS 10.1.2.0.2 with Business Intelligence and Forms Installation.
Previously I have never seen Average Response Time of Reports server greater than 10000(ms),
But It is increasing continously and now within 2-3 days it has increased upto 114668(ms)
CPU Usage (%)          N/A
     Memory Usage (MB)          N/A
     Average Response Time (ms)          114668
its Maximum queue size is 1000....
I am not able to find out why it is increasing in this manner.....
plz help..
Thanx

Hi,
Today it has been increased upto 170236 ...
Thanx,
Santosh

ISA Server 2006 + Average response time for Non Cached requests = performance issues?!?!?!

All,
I am in a predicament with internet browsing speeds...We have a 3rd party look after our line and internet facing f/w so I cant troubleshoot them, so at the moment Im looking at ISA as the potential bottleneck - we have a fairly standard environment:
Internal > Local Host > Perimiter n/work > Firewall > Internet
I have been running custom reports on the ISA server to see what data can be collected - I have noticed that "Average response time for non cached requests" (traffic by time of day) can be as high as 76 seconds!!!!!! Cached hits are between .5
and 2 seconds.
I have also coonfigured a connectivity verifier which is also flagging slow connectivity, massively over the >5000ms and also reporting "cant resolve server name on occassions- and this is configured for
www.Microsoft.com --- DNS ???!?!, however I have looked through DNS (no obvious errors / config issues) which I can see
I have run the BPA on ISA server to ensure its Health - - connectivity verifier errors flagged timeouts to microsoft.com as expected...
Can anyone advise any obvious areas to investigate as Im struggling! - as always the 3rd party have told us the internet pipe is fine :O

Problem resolved.
DNS forwarders have been changed on the ISA server / DNS and this has improved lookup speed considerably.
thanks all :)

ASM & Average Response Time

Greetings All, I was hoping that others may have some insight into DB Control and how is reports ASM Disk response times.
First my environment:
Oracle RAC 11g R1 Standard Edition, Patchset 12
Two Node Cluster
Windows x64 2003 R2 DataCenter Edition.
I am leveraging DB Control to monitor the ASM instances along with the db instances. My issue is regarding how db control gathers metrics to report on average response time for the DISKS that make up the Disk Group.
I have two issues:
1.) The overall response time reported in db control for my disk group "DATA" does not jive with the average I calculate based on the numbers being reported by db control. E.g.) I have ten LUNS in my DATA disk group and if I calculate the mean avg response time from each individual disk as reported by db control I don't get the same number being reported by db control. The numbers differ by as much as 20%.
2.) The numbers reported by ASM for avg response time for each LUN in the disk group are not the same from disk to disk. E.g.) In my current production environment here are the Avg Response Times for each LUN in the group:
8.73, 11.38, 5.22, 4.13, 3.04, 15.84, 12.71, 12.91, 10.51, 9.25.
I would have expected that these disks would have had the same avg response time because ASM is working to guarantee that each disk has the same number of I/O's.
The disk array has identical disks for all 10.
Further, the average for all disks as being reported by db control is : 7.28.
If I do the math I get an average of 9.38, the % diff between these two numbers is 28%
I have heard that db control does a poor job of reporting on ASM disk metrics but this is just people grumbling. I was hoping that someone out there may have some solid facts regarding db control and ASM.

hey....
maybe its be better off to open a generel discussion task on metalink....
*T

Average Response Times for a Reports Server

On Application Server Control and Grid Control are sections listing the Average Response Time in milliseconds.
Can anyone tell me what response it is measuring exactly?
Thanks
Andy

See the Online Help for the page for a description of the metric. In Help, you can search for "metric" to see definitions of the other metrics.

ST03N Tcode not showing last 3 days average response time

Hi,
In my Production system not showing last 3 days average response time.In our production 1 (CI+DB) and 3 dialog instances are there. In all servers sapcollector working fine but in all servers not showing last 3 days values.Please advise solution.
Thanks,
Srinivas.

The following are the prerequisites needed to get the workload monitor(st03) working.
1)      The system time zone of the SAP and the Operating system has to be same. This can be done by customizing time zones of the SAP using the Tcode STZAC.
2)     All the standard background jobs has to be scheduled to run. This can be done by scheduling the standard background jobs using the Tcode SM36.
3)     The following parameters has to be added to the instance profile.
Parameter                                                  Value(default)                                                  Description
i.     stat/as_collect                                                          = 2                                          Application statistic: detailed records.
ii.     stat/as_level                                                              = 1                                          Records for application statistic are active.
iii.     stat/max_files                                                           = 48                                        Max. no. of stat files to be kept.
iv.     stat/as_max_files                                                    = 48                                        Max. no. of appl. stat files to be kept.
This can be done by editing the profiles using the Tcode RZ10.

[Weblogic 11G] FrontEnd Average Response time exploded

--- windows server 2008 R2
--- weblogic 10.3.2
--- Sun JVM 1_6
Good morning,
We have an web app (war archive contained in an ear) deployed on weblogic cluster (2 managed nodes). This application is monitored through Wily Introscope and regularly I can see the metrics "FrontEnd-->Average response time" rockets to 100K ms.
Effectively, some pages are loading very slowly...
I'd like to know what should be monitored and the tricks and tips to make sure my Weblogic managed servers are configured correctly, how can I check that everything is OK on the "web container side"
Thank you
--Simon

hey....
maybe its be better off to open a generel discussion task on metalink....
*T

Average Response Time ASM

Hi,
Installed 10g RAC SE on Enterprise Linux 64. We have two ASM instances with 2 disk groups DATA and FRA. Database Control reports for disk group DATA (that consists of 3 RAID 5 vol.) that Average Response Time is 54-58 ms. Read Response Time is around 40-45ms. Everything is done to Oracle recommendations with a large stripe size and so on. We don't have performance problem but should not the response time be better? Can someone else share response time values for comparison?
Regards Lars

Grid Control always has been notoriously bad at measuring I/O performance of ASM, sadly. The service time numbers are usually high, and the IOPs numbers often are not IOPs so much as "I/Os to date with periodic resets to zero" numbers.
As the previous poster said, use iostat. On Linux, iostat -x, the svctm column.

Webgui and high response time

Hi guys,
we have upgraded our worktation to windows 7 with IE9. Our users complains high response time after migration.
We have tested the webgui with Win 7 and IE8 and the response time is accetable, but we can't downgrade the IE version.
We have tried to setup the compatibility with IE8 , but the issue persist.
Do you have any suggestion about resolve the issue ?
thank's in advance fro your help.
Antonino

What is your SAP MII version?
While loading webpage, is it showing contentiously loading and not opening content, then its 100% java issue only.
Goto IE9-->Tools-->internet options --> Advanced --> Browsing check(Disable script debugging). Once you down this, on status bar its shows the error like 'undefined object'.
To correct it, you need to upgrade or degrade java version accordingly.
Mine is Window 7 and using Java version 1.7.0_13-b20. its working fine.
Regards,
Praveen Reddy

CPIC/RFC Time vs Total Response time

Hi experts,
We are experiencing performance issues in our SRM system, when checking the transaction ST03 we have identified a high dialog comsuption time in the Average RFC Interface time (CPIC/RFC), this time is even higher than the Total Average Reponse Time per dialog step.
Could you please let us know if the component Average RFC Interface time (CPIC/RFC) is part of the average response time? We can't understand why this time is almos the double than the
Thanks and best regards,

Hello Sowmya,
I would normally suggest a solution without having detailed background about your system such as SAP kernel, SAP release etc.
But the following SAP Note almost describes your issue.
2071875 - Incorrect Average RFC Interface Time ("CPIC/RFC") in ST03N Workload Overview ("Average time per step in ms")
Hope that helps.
Regards,
Siddhesh

Incorrect Alerts CPU Time and Average Response Time

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for