Increased CPU utilization on Sup1A after upgrade

Hello,
I recently upgraded a 6009 with Supervisor 1A from CatOS 7.6(5) to 8.4(4). Baseline total CPU utilization before the upgrade was about 12%, post upgrade it sits at about 30%.
We have several similar switches throughout our network that we intend to upgrade as well, so are treating this one box as a testbed. We will soon deploy IP telephones to every desk in our network, and want to determine if this higher baseline utilization will be problematic for us.
Considering voice, should we be concerned about this? Will any changes due to voice deployment such as many trunks, QoS, etc. cause a significant jump in CPU that might put our baseline even higher?
Will the higher baseline CPU utilization affect switch performance? I know most forwarding functions do not depend upon the CPU, and are switched via ASIC.
thanks for the help,
Brad

The IDLE_Tasks process on which you are seeing a slightly higher CPU is actually an enhancement that collects information more effectively on crashinfo files (files generated when there is a crash on the box). This enhancement went into 8.3(x) and 8.4(x)
In the past "IDLE_tasks" processing was not counted and therefore belong to the "kernel and IDLE" process (which as you can see in the show proc cpu) accounts the amount of cpu not being used.
If you are upgrading other 6500's with Sup1a's make sure they all have 128MB DRAM just like this one has.

Similar Messages

Increased number of journal receivers after upgrade from ECC 5.0 to 6.0

After are upgrade from ECC 5.0 to ECC 6.0 on an iSeries machine we have noticed an increase in the number journal receivers being created by SAP approximately twice as many that were being created on are 5.0 system. I've checked all the attributes for the journal receivers and they were set the same on both versions. This hasn't caused use any issues but just wondering if anyone else has experienced this or knows the cause of this. Thanks, Jason Duncan

After are upgrade from ECC 5.0 to ECC 6.0 on an iSeries machine we have noticed an increase in the number journal receivers being created by SAP approximately twice as many that were being created on are 5.0 system. I've checked all the attributes for the journal receivers and they were set the same on both versions. This hasn't caused use any issues but just wondering if anyone else has experienced this or knows the cause of this. Thanks, Jason Duncan

The iMac CPU fan going ape **** after upgrade

Just installed Mountain Lion - result: CPU fan is at 3000 RPM constantly. CPU temperature 50 celcuis, GPU around 70. Nothing serious is running - just Safari iTunes and Mail.
Any suggesions?

If you're running ESET Cybersecurity you may need to upgrade. Older versions have been causing a crash in the Launch files which means reportcrash constantly triggers (drains battery and kicks in the fans).
Here's the fix...
First, check you've got a problem with crashreport (run Activity Monitor and select 'All processes'). If crashreport is at the top of the list with 100+ % CPU time and you have ESET then it's possibly this issue.
Go to Eset website and download the latest version of Cybersecurity and run the dmg file once downloaded. Click the 'uninstall' button to remove and you should (hopefully, as I did) see the crashreport stop. You can then reinstall ESET (I have done with the newer version with no problem).
I'm not sure if a straight install over the top (upgrade) will work - easy to uninstall and reinstall in a few mins anyway.
I hope this helps a lot of people out!

Does SAM effect to decrease CPU utilization on CSS ?

Hi everyone,
I have encountered the symptom that CPU utilization on CSS 11501 is increasing periodically.
I assume that this symptom is caused by handling many traffic on CSS 11501 and I am thinking it would be better to replace CSS 11501 to CSS 11503 with Session Accelerator Module (SAM).
So my question is, if increasing CPU utilization due to many traffic to handle by CSS, is CPU utilization decreasing by using SAM ?
Or do you have any idea ?ãsuch as adding I/O module ?
Your information would be appreciated.
Shinichi

the traffic will be split accross all the modules.
So, if the high cpu is due to traffic, adding another module like sam will help.
However, only the scp handles management of the box, like configuration, telnet, ssh, routing, snmp, ...
so if high cpu is due to such a process, adding another module will have no impact.
Gilles

Increase in CPU Utilization after migration from APEX 3.1.2 to APEX 3.2

Has any noticed any increase in CPU Utilization after migrating from APEX 3.1.2 to APEX 3.2?
Thanks,
Mark

Hi Mark,
Take a look at some of the usage reports within APEX (sessions, page views etc) to get an overall feel for where the time is being consumed.
You'll also find it useful if you can run a statspack report (or AWR, ASH etc) during a busy period to be able to drill down into where that CPU is being spent.
There's no magic answers here unfortunately, you need to track it down to where the time is being spent before working back up to find out where best to tune it.
John.
Blog: http://jes.blogs.shellprompt.net
Work: http://www.apex-evangelists.com
Author of Pro Application Express: http://tinyurl.com/3gu7cd
REWARDS: Please remember to mark helpful or correct posts on the forum, not just for my answers but for everyone!

Heavu CPU Utilization of Dictionary Query - After 9i to 10g Upgrade

Hi Friends,
We have migrated our production DB from Oracle 9i(Windows) to Oracle 10g(AIX) and after that a heavy cpu utilization query is coming frequently and hence many timeouts are happening in the application.
Application is connecting to the database through Java Application (JDBC).
Once the application service is started, below query is invoked and CPU takes around 20% continuously.
The interesting thing is this query is not owned by the application schema but by SYS and it's invoked from Application Schema.
We have raised an SR but still no luck.
Any help will be very much appreciated.
SELECT -- Packaged procedures with no arguments package_name AS procedu
re_cat, owner AS procedure_schem, object_name AS procedure_name, NULL
, NULL, NULL, 'Packaged procedure' AS remarks, 1 AS procedure_type
FROM all_arguments WHERE argument_name IS NULL AND data_type IS NULL AN
D package_name LIKE :3 ESCAPE '/' AND owner LIKE :4 ESCAPE '/' AND obje
ct_name LIKE :5 ESCAPE '/' UNION ALL SELECT -- Packaged procedures with a
rguments package_name AS procedure_cat, owner AS procedure_schem, obj
ect_name AS procedure_name, NULL, NULL, NULL, 'Packaged procedure'
AS remarks, 1 AS procedure_type FROM all_arguments WHERE argument_name IS
NOT NULL AND position = 1 AND position = sequence AND package_name L
IKE :3 ESCAPE '/' AND owner LIKE :4 ESCAPE '/' AND object_name LIKE :5
ESCAPE '/' UNION ALL SELECT -- Packaged functions package_name AS proce
dure_cat, owner AS procedure_schem, object_name AS procedure_name, NU
LL, NULL, NULL, 'Pa
Regards,
Savad

Pl do not post duplicate threads - Heavy CPU Utilization of Dictionary Query - After 9i to 10g Upgrade
Srini

Heavy CPU Utilization of Dictionary Query - After 9i to 10g Upgrade

Hi Friends,
We have migrated our production DB from Oracle 9i(Windows) to Oracle 10g(AIX) and after that a heavy cpu utilization query is coming frequently and hence many timeouts are happening in the application.
Application is connecting to the database through Java Application (JDBC).
Once the application service is started, below query is invoked and CPU takes around 20% continuously.
The interesting thing is this query is not owned by the application schema but by SYS and it's invoked from Application Schema.
We have raised an SR but still no luck.
Any help will be very much appreciated.
SELECT -- Packaged procedures with no arguments package_name AS procedu
re_cat, owner AS procedure_schem, object_name AS procedure_name, NULL
, NULL, NULL, 'Packaged procedure' AS remarks, 1 AS procedure_type
FROM all_arguments WHERE argument_name IS NULL AND data_type IS NULL AN
D package_name LIKE :3 ESCAPE '/' AND owner LIKE :4 ESCAPE '/' AND obje
ct_name LIKE :5 ESCAPE '/' UNION ALL SELECT -- Packaged procedures with a
rguments package_name AS procedure_cat, owner AS procedure_schem, obj
ect_name AS procedure_name, NULL, NULL, NULL, 'Packaged procedure'
AS remarks, 1 AS procedure_type FROM all_arguments WHERE argument_name IS
NOT NULL AND position = 1 AND position = sequence AND package_name L
IKE :3 ESCAPE '/' AND owner LIKE :4 ESCAPE '/' AND object_name LIKE :5
ESCAPE '/' UNION ALL SELECT -- Packaged functions package_name AS proce
dure_cat, owner AS procedure_schem, object_name AS procedure_name, NU
LL, NULL, NULL, 'Pa
Regards,
Savad
Edited by: user9292816 on May 9, 2011 4:35 AM

Hi,
We couldn't find anything in the alert log related to this.
But we have taken the explain plan from both DBs as shown below.
PLan of the Query in Oracle 9.2.0.8(Windows - Old DB )
SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display());
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | | | |
| 1 | SORT ORDER BY | | | | |
|* 2 | FILTER | | | | |
|* 3 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | ARGUMENT$ | | | |
| 4 | NESTED LOOPS | | | | |
| 5 | NESTED LOOPS | | | | |
| 6 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| USER$ | | | |
|* 7 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | I_USER1 | | | |
| 8 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| OBJ$ | | | |
|* 9 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | I_OBJ2 | | | |
|* 10 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | I_ARGUMENT2 | | | |
|* 11 | FIXED TABLE FULL | X$KZSPR | | | |
|* 12 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | OBJAUTH$ | | | |
| 13 | NESTED LOOPS | | | | |
| 14 | FIXED TABLE FULL | X$KZSRO | | | |
|* 15 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | I_OBJAUTH2 | | | |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
2 - filter("SYS_ALIAS_1"."OWNER#"=:B1 OR EXISTS (SELECT /*+ */ 0 FROM
"X$KZSPR" "X$KZSPR" WHERE "X$KZSPR"."INST_ID"=:B2 AND
((-"X$KZSPR"."KZSPRPRV")=(-144) OR (-"X$KZSPR"."KZSPRPRV")=(-141))) OR EXISTS
(SELECT 0 FROM "SYS"."OBJAUTH$" "OBJAUTH$","X$KZSRO" "X$KZSRO" WHERE
"OBJAUTH$"."OBJ#"=:B3 AND "OBJAUTH$"."GRANTEE#"="X$KZSRO"."KZSROROL" AND
"OBJAUTH$"."PRIVILEGE#"=12))
3 - filter(("A"."ARGUMENT" LIKE :Z ESCAPE '/' OR "A"."ARGUMENT" IS NULL AND
DECODE("A"."TYPE#",0,NULL,1,DECODE("A"."CHARSETFORM",2,'NVARCHAR2','VARCHAR2'),2,
DECODE("A"."SCALE",(-127),'FLOAT','NUMBER'),3,'NATIVE
INTEGER',8,'LONG',9,DECODE("A"."CHARSETFORM",2,'NCHAR
VARYING','VARCHAR'),11,'ROWID',12,'DATE',23,'RAW',24,'LONG
RAW',29,'BINARY_INTEGER',69,'ROWID',96,DECODE("A"."CHARSETFORM",2,'NCHAR','CHAR')
,102,'REF CURSOR',104,'UROWID',105,'MLSLABEL',106,'MLSLABEL',110,'REF',111,'REF',
112,DECODE("A"."CHARSETFORM",2,'NCLOB','CLOB'),113,'BLOB',114,'BFILE',115,'CFILE'
,121,'OBJECT',122,'TABLE',123,'VARRAY',178,'TIME',179,'TIME WITH TIME
ZONE',180,'TIMESTAMP',181,'TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE',231,'TIMESTAMP WITH LOCAL
TIME ZONE',182,'INTERVAL YEAR TO MONTH',183,'INTERVAL DAY TO SECOND',250,'PL/SQL
RECORD',251,'PL/SQL TABLE',252,'PL/SQL BOOLEAN','UNDEFINED') IS NOT NULL) AND
DECODE("A"."PROCEDURE$",NULL,NULL,"SYS_ALIAS_1"."NAME") LIKE :Z ESCAPE '/' AND
NVL("A"."PROCEDURE$","SYS_ALIAS_1"."NAME") LIKE :Z ESCAPE '/')
7 - access("U"."NAME" LIKE :Z ESCAPE '/')
filter("U"."NAME" LIKE :Z ESCAPE '/')
9 - access("SYS_ALIAS_1"."OWNER#"="U"."USER#")
10 - access("SYS_ALIAS_1"."OBJ#"="A"."OBJ#")
11 - filter("X$KZSPR"."INST_ID"=:B1 AND ((-"X$KZSPR"."KZSPRPRV")=(-144) OR
(-"X$KZSPR"."KZSPRPRV")=(-141)))
12 - filter("OBJAUTH$"."PRIVILEGE#"=12)
15 - access("OBJAUTH$"."GRANTEE#"="X$KZSRO"."KZSROROL" AND
"OBJAUTH$"."OBJ#"=:B1)
Note: rule based optimization
PLan of the Query in Oracle 10.2.0.5.3(AIX - New DB )
?PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Plan hash value: 2991281545
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 109 | 451 (3)| 00:00:06 |
| 1 | SORT ORDER BY | | 1 | 109 | 451 (3)| 00:00:06 |
|* 2 | FILTER | | | | | |
|* 3 | HASH JOIN | | 3 | 327 | 450 (3)| 00:00:06 |
|* 4 | HASH JOIN | | 12 | 1128 | 448 (3)| 00:00:06 |
|* 5 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | ARGUMENT$ | 4821 | 291K| 259 (3)| 00:00:04 |
| 6 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | OBJ$ | 56329 | 1760K| 187 (2)| 00:00:03 |
| 7 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| USER$ | 6 | 90 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 8 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | I_USER1 | 2 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 9 | FIXED TABLE FULL | X$KZSPR | 1 | 26 | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 10 | NESTED LOOPS | | 2 | 50 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 11 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | I_OBJAUTH1 | 1 | 12 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 12 | FIXED TABLE FULL | X$KZSRO | 2 | 26 | 0 (0)| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
2 - filter("OWNER#"=USERENV('SCHEMAID') OR EXISTS (SELECT 0 FROM SYS."X$KZSPR"
"X$KZSPR" WHERE ((-"KZSPRPRV")=(-144) OR (-"KZSPRPRV")=(-141)) AND
"INST_ID"=USERENV('INSTANCE')) OR EXISTS (SELECT 0 FROM "SYS"."OBJAUTH$"
"OBJAUTH$",SYS."X$KZSRO" "X$KZSRO" WHERE "GRANTEE#"="KZSROROL" AND "OBJ#"=:B1 AND
"PRIVILEGE#"=12))
3 - access("O"."OWNER#"="U"."USER#")
4 - access("O"."OBJ#"="A"."OBJ#")
filter(NVL("A"."PROCEDURE$","O"."NAME") LIKE :2 ESCAPE '/' AND
DECODE("A"."PROCEDURE$",NULL,NULL,"O"."NAME") LIKE :3 ESCAPE '/')
5 - filter("A"."ARGUMENT" LIKE :5 ESCAPE '/' OR "A"."ARGUMENT" IS NULL AND
DECODE("A"."TYPE#",0,NULL,1,DECODE("A"."CHARSETFORM",2,'NVARCHAR2','VARCHAR2'),2,DECO
DE("A"."SCALE",(-127),'FLOAT','NUMBER'),3,'NATIVE
INTEGER',8,'LONG',9,DECODE("A"."CHARSETFORM",2,'NCHAR
VARYING','VARCHAR'),11,'ROWID',12,'DATE',23,'RAW',24,'LONG
RAW',29,'BINARY_INTEGER',69,'ROWID',96,DECODE("A"."CHARSETFORM",2,'NCHAR','CHAR'),100
,'BINARY_FLOAT',101,'BINARY_DOUBLE',102,'REF
CURSOR',104,'UROWID',105,'MLSLABEL',106,'MLSLABEL',110,'REF',111,'REF',112,DECODE("A"
."CHARSETFORM",2,'NCLOB','CLOB'),113,'BLOB',114,'BFILE',115,'CFILE',121,'OBJECT',122,
'TABLE',123,'VARRAY',178,'TIME',179,'TIME WITH TIME
ZONE',180,'TIMESTAMP',181,'TIMESTAMP WITH TIME ZONE',231,'TIMESTAMP WITH LOCAL TIME
ZONE',182,'INTERVAL YEAR TO MONTH',183,'INTERVAL DAY TO SECOND',250,'PL/SQL
RECORD',251,'PL/SQL TABLE',252,'PL/SQL BOOLEAN','UNDEFINED') IS NOT NULL)
8 - access("U"."NAME" LIKE :1 ESCAPE '/')
filter("U"."NAME" LIKE :1 ESCAPE '/')
9 - filter(((-"KZSPRPRV")=(-144) OR (-"KZSPRPRV")=(-141)) AND
"INST_ID"=USERENV('INSTANCE'))
11 - access("OBJ#"=:B1 AND "PRIVILEGE#"=12)
filter("PRIVILEGE#"=12)
12 - filter("GRANTEE#"="KZSROROL")
52 rows selected.
Regards,
Savad

After upgrading to Lion, the Finder will increase the virtual memory while using external HD

after upgrading to Lion, the Finder will increase the "virtual memory size" while using external HD. I check it using Activity Monitor and found that "Finder" wll increase the "Virtual Memory Size" and "Private Memory Size". and then after a while. the system told me my HD is full and hanging there.
My External HD is 1TB. and I have installed new version Paragon NTFS for Mac V.9.01. I am not sure it is related or not.
but I attached my external HD. the "Finder" will start to increase the "Virtual Memory Size".
please help out this case and solve this issue.
thank you !!!

The one has nothing to do with the other. Virtual memory size and Private memory size are used by developers to analyze their software. it has nothing to do with anything related to the user.

After upgrading to OS X Mavericks syslogd needs lot of memory and cpu, system is very slow

After upgrading to OS X Mavericks the system is very slow. securityd and syslogd are using 50% of cpu and memory is also used by syslogd and kerneltask (8 GB out of 12). After rebooting the system it runs very well, a view days later (without reboot, only hibernating) the situation is the same.
Looks like a problem in OS X. Any solutions?

I haven't worked out the LDAP messages but I noticed at other times I was seeing lots of album art messages from BlackBerry desktop. I'd already uninstalled the app but it still had processes running. I followed this link to remove completely; http://apple.stackexchange.com/questions/57023/how-to-uninstall-completely-black berry-device-manager
CPU levels have been noticeably lower ever since.

MDNSResponder taking 100 percent CPU after upgrading to 10.5.1

Hello,
just want to know if anybody else has the same problem.
After upgrading to 10.5.1 the process mDNSResponder took up almost 100 percent of CPU power.
In the system.log following line appears (very often):
mDNSResponder[171]: KQ SSLHandshake failed: -9806
I took a look at my Linux firewall in front of my network and it drops a lot of packages:
REJECT:IN=eth0 OUT=ppp0 SRC=192.168.2.20 DST=17.250.248.161 LEN=64 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=63 ID=47178 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=63684 DPT=5354 WINDOW=65535 RES=0x00 SYN URGP=0
Looking who is 17.250.248.161 turn out:
bash-3.2# dig -x 17.250.248.161
; <<>> DiG 9.4.1-P1 <<>> -x 17.250.248.161
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 7068
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;161.248.250.17.in-addr.arpa. IN PTR
;; ANSWER SECTION:
161.248.250.17.in-addr.arpa. 6000 IN PTR pm-members.mac.com.
;; Query time: 210 msec
;; SERVER: 192.168.2.1#53(192.168.2.1)
;; WHEN: Fri Nov 16 06:45:11 2007
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 77
Maybe this is a server something to do with .MAC (I'm a member and some sync are turned on)?
I opened the 5354 port and mDNSReponder is now running normal.
But hey Apple, I don't want computers be registered by Bonjour or something else at your servers.
Can you please check this out?
Thanks for your answers.
Andreas

Hi
I think I found the cause to my problem and also solved it?
When I investigated my "Console Log" the next message was repeated :
... mDNSResponder[202] Failed to obtain NAT port mapping from router 10.0.1.1 external address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx internal port 9999
This gave me an idea and pointed in the NAT configurations.
What have I done (which solved my problem) :
• opened "Airport Utility"
• selected my Airport Base Station
• choose "manual Setup"
• choose "internet connection"
• after that i selected the tab "NAT"
• where I deactivated "Enable NAT port mapping protocol"
• and then I updated my Airport Base station
=> since then, no more the problem and de message disappeared from the "Console Log"
Greetings
Peter

Memory and CPU consumption very high after OS X10.7.5 upgrade.

Hi,
I am new to Mac world (just couple of months and still getting used to mac).
After upgrade to OS X 10.7.5, I am seeing gradual memory consumption upon normal bootup and login. loginwindow, systemUIServer and systemUIAgent processes are using almost all the remaining RAM. Also, _coreaudiod process is consuming maximum CPU.
System Preferences is not responding.
I don't have TimeMachine setup. No backup is available.
Any remedy?

Disable your Extensis / Suitcase font plugins until they can get a patch out.

DS6 instance reaches 50% CPU utilization after restart

Hi,
I am running DS6 on Solaris 10. I noticed that after every orderly restart slapd process reaches 50% CPU utilization. This situation lasts for about 5 min. What do you think it is?
Thank you.

At Startup Directory Server does initialize some of its caches :
- ACI
- Roles
- Class Of Service.
- Groups (for the new isMemberOf feature).
Depending on your configuration these searches may take a little bit of time and cpu.
Regards,
Ludovic

After migration Exchange 2013, MBX server, CPU utilization is so high

CPU utilization become so high this morning after migration into Exchange 2013,
Some healthy DBs is getting disccounetced with growing replay Queue length, mounted DB is no issue.
It seems that's short of CPU performance,
Are there any processes to limit or set up to reduce the load of CPU, MBX servers? It's temporary treatment...

What's the CU level you have for your Exchange 2013? Also, please check node runner processor as Node Runner process can cause CPU utilization issue. I would also suggest to check your disk IOPs as it looks like disk IOPs issue to me as well. Thanks.
Regards, Riaz Javed Butt | Consultant Microsoft Professional Services MCITP, MCITP (Exchange), MCSE: Messaging, MCITP Office 365 | mstechtalk.com

Performance by system and utilization reports are blank after upgrading SCOM 2012 SP1 to SCOM 2012 R2

Hi Experts,
We are getting blank Performance reports after upgrading to SCOM 2012 R2. Can anyone provide fix for this issue?
All the reports are working fine except Performance by system and utilization report.
Thanks in advance.
Regards
Karthick Malayalan

Hi Karthick,
Here are two links for your reference regarding to the blank report issue:
SCOM 2012 performance by system report and perform by utilization
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/systemcenter/en-US/b1b13318-2de5-4940-82a2-a8ce5b832c11/scom-2012-performance-by-system-report-and-perform-by-utilization?forum=operationsmanagerreporting
Base OS MP Version 6.0.6989.0 Imported? And Now Some Reports Are Partially
Empty?
http://thoughtsonopsmgr.blogspot.com/2012/11/base-os-mp-version-6069890-imported-and.htmlRegards,
Yan Li
Regards, Yan Li

Table AUD$ is flooded after upgrade to 11.2.0. - 100 times increase.

Our Production Oracle database is flooded audit messages. The volume of audit information generated increased 100 times! A simple select count(*) from dba_objects generates 20 entries in aud$ table. All VPD related operations are audited. Even select . from dual generates tonns of entries.
Did somebody run into this problem after upgrading to 11.2.0.2 ?
Any thoughts / suggestions would be highly appreciated.

Hello;
Last fall I updated one of our databases to 11.2.0.2 that had a link to an Oracle 10 database.
We had the exact same thing. I ended up doing a rollback.
Searching for my oracle document....
Later
Found this, but its not the one I'm still looking for
AUDIT_SYS_OPERATIONS Set To FALSE Yet Audit Files Are Generated [ID 308066.1]
The other piece of information I have is we were using Patch 9362194. (Solaris patch only)
Seemed to only happen with a link from 11.2.0.2 to Oracle 10.
ORA-07445 When Executing Procedure Over DBLink While Enabling DB Audit [ID 1361130.1]
Best Regards
mseberg
Edited by: mseberg on Dec 1, 2011 7:47 AM
You are right that is an 11.2.0.1, it was from my notes since 11.2.0.1 was giving us a different issue we tried to go to 11.2.0.2. In our case this helped find the cause, but did nothing to settle the debate of what should and should not be in the audit.
select * from DBA_PRIV_AUDIT_OPTS
union all
select * from DBA_STMT_AUDIT_OPTS;Edited by: mseberg on Dec 2, 2011 6:10 PM

Increased CPU utilization on Sup1A after upgrade

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for