Increased file size results when migrating from RH6 to RH7

Hi experts,
Not sure where to post this message, so I appologize for
repeating myself. I am a Frame Expert, but a RoboHelp Novice. I
created a new help project in RH7, based on an old one in RH6. It
generated and now the R&D department is telling me that many
new files are created and the file size is 10MB larger. Can someone
tell me if all these files are necessary?
xxx.ali
xxx.BRS
xxx.cpd
xxx.glo
xxx.hhc
xxx.hhk
xxx.ign
xxx.ldb
xxx.phr
xxx.ppf
xxx.pss
xxx.stp
xxx.svn
xxx.xpj
Im sure that most of these file extensions were created in
the previous version and that the file name itself (which I didn't
list) is what is new, but before I tell this to the engineer I want
to be sure.
Size is an issue because this software is being deployed from
a flash card. the extra 10MB in space could be considered a blocker
and stop our development.
Any help is great!
Laura

Those are files from the source. Your application only needs
the files in the ouput. By default, these will be in a subfolder
below !SSL!
Sometimes people ask if all the output files are required.
The stock answer is only if you want the help to work. :-)
Do note though, you only need to deliver whatever is in the
output you generate.

Similar Messages

How to increase file size on solaris 10 from 2g

HI All,
how can i increase the file size on solaris 10 from 2gb .
please reply complete steps.
or any helpful tutorials
thanks

files (log files ) are being created by application and max size for the files is "2147483647" and that restriction i cant get complete logs so how can i increase the file size ?
Q) What filesystem are you using?
A) UFS
Q) What Kernel release are you using? (uname -a)
A) SunOS ss00 5.10 Generic_120012-14 i86pc i386 i86pc
Q) What system are you running Solaris on? (prtdiag -v | head)
A) System Configuration: Sun Microsystems Sun Fire V20z
BIOS Configuration: Phoenix Technologies Ltd. V1.34.4.2 08/24/2005
BMC Configuration: IPMI 1.5 (KCS: Keyboard Controller Style)
==== Processor Sockets ====================================
Version Location Tag
AMD CPU0-Socket 940
AMD CPU1-Socket 940
Q) Are you running a 32-bit or 64-bit Kernel? (isainfo -v)
A) 64-bit amd64 applications
sse2 sse fxsr amd_3dnowx amd_3dnow amd_mmx mmx cmov amd_sysc cx8 tsc
fpu
32-bit i386 applications
sse2 sse fxsr amd_3dnowx amd_3dnow amd_mmx mmx cmov amd_sysc cx8 tsc
fpu
Q) How is the file being modified or created?
A) files are being created by application
Can you create a 3GB file using mkfile(1M) - # mkfile 3g 3gfile
A) 3221225472 Jun 8 05:31 3gfile yes file was created successfully

Video file size triples when transferred from camera into FCP

I recorded about 16gb of video in avchd on a canon hf10. When I import it into fcp6 using pro ress 422, the file sizes are enormous, about 100 gb from the original 16. How did this happen and how do I shrink my finished project it back down to fit on a dvd. I used compressor and Mpeg2 and got it down to 3.7gb but the quality was horrendous. I used compressor and h.264 and it took 24 hours then crashed before finishing.
using a canon vixia hf10, and FCP 6.
Thanks!

AVCHD is not a convenient format for editing so FCP converts it to ProRes which as you have discovered is around 50GB for an hour of footage.
ProRes enables it to be edited more easily and with better quality.
The size in gigabytes of your project is completely irrelevant . . . . it could be a terabyte with no problems.
All that matters is the length (time) of the project . . . . as long as it is no more than a couple of hours or so you will have no problems fitting it onto a DVD as iDVD or DVD Studio Pro etc. will compress it all down to around 4GB to fit.

File sizes vary when importing from iPhoto to different iPads. Why?

I'm running Mavericks with iphoto 9.5.1 and using iTunes 11.1.3. I have a iphoto library of 6830 pictures. We upload these pictures to mulitiple ipads. This xmas I got a couple new ipads to replace old ones and upon syncing the photos to the new ipads the file size is much larger than on the older ipads.
For instance. My photos that sync'd over to my iPad 2 was around 9 GB. Now on my ipad air it takes up 22.72.
I have a similar experience with my wifes new iPad Mini.
Any ideas or suggestions on what is going on?

Rather supports the guess. The smaller screen means smaller images are synced. When you sync with a device the images are optimised for that device. Those optimised versions are stored in the iPod Photo Cache.

HT4413 When migrating from time machine to my new hard drive, only some files and applications and setting are transferred, not all of them. In my latest back up I have them all. How can I fix that?

When migrating from time machine to a new hard drive, not all is transferd, only partial documents, applications , settings etc. How can I migrate the latest back-up with all the content.

sohs wrote:
When migrating from time machine to a new hard drive, not all is transferd, only partial documents, applications , settings etc. How can I migrate the latest back-up with all the content.
If you want to use Time Machine to recover the contents of one of its a backups to a new drive, follow the instructions in Mac OS X 10.6: Recovering your entire system. Note that you must select the "Restore System From Backup" option from the Utilities menu of the Installer disc to do this.
Also note that if you are transferring files to a hard drive to be used with a different computer, you should use Migration Assistant instead. This intentionally will not copy everything because some settings, applications, etc. are not compatible computer-to-computer. Migration Assistant will copy everything that is.

Work book size increased by 4 times after migrating from BW3.5 to BI7

Hi Experts
work book size increased by 4 times after migrating from BW3.5 to BI7
our client runs the report using BI web report and exports to excel sheet.
she asks us to investigate why the size of the work book isincreased by 4 times after migrating from BW3.5 to BI7.
please let me know what you think.
thank you for reading this.
Regards
satish

ANY suggestion would be greatly appreciated

Adding Bates numbers to PDFs increases file size by 10x - How to keep original size?

I have a lot of email texts that I converted from Word to PDF and then Bates numbered.
However, Bates numbering made each email's file size go from about 50kb to 500kb.
Once I combine these larger files for uploading to a docket, at the maximum allowable file size is 4 Mb, I can put together only 8-10 emails at a time. What to do to keep the original file size small when Bates numbering?

Hi paulu40695891,
Yes, there is a significant increase in the file size when one applies bates numbering to the pdf and saves it.
A workaround for this issue would be to save the pdf file again as reduced size pdf. (File -> Save as other -> Reduced Size PDF. )
Does that helps with your issue? Please revert back for any further query or assistance.
Regards,
Rahul

HT4796 When migrating from a PC to my Mac user on the Mac.

When migrating from a PC to my Mac, the files get created under a new user on the Mac. How do I move the files to my user log on?

Check out the following KB Articles:
http://support.apple.com/kb/PH11393
OS X Mountain Lion: Transfer your information from a PC
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1408
How to transfer data from a PC to a Mac

JMS issues when migration from weblogic 9.2 to 10.3.5

We are facing some issues when migration from weblogic 9.2 to 10.3.5
In weblogic 9.2 :_
BMP Entity EJBs used in our project are read-only in nature using entity cache, below is the configuration details
<!DOCTYPE weblogic-ejb-jar PUBLIC "-//BEA Systems, Inc.//DTD WebLogic 6.0.0 EJB//EN" "http://www.bea.com/servers/wls600/dtd/weblogic-ejb-jar.dtd">
<weblogic-ejb-jar>
<weblogic-enterprise-bean>
<ejb-name>
Company
</ejb-name>
<entity-descriptor>
<pool>
<max-beans-in-free-pool>300</max-beans-in-free-pool>
<initial-beans-in-free-pool>150</initial-beans-in-free-pool>
</pool>
<entity-cache>
<max-beans-in-cache>3500</max-beans-in-cache>
<idle-timeout-seconds>100000</idle-timeout-seconds>
<read-timeout-seconds>0</read-timeout-seconds>
<concurrency-strategy>ReadOnly</concurrency-strategy>
</entity-cache>
Entity beans will get refreshed using the JMS messges. with in the MDB descriptor files(weblogic-ejb-jar.xml) we are using the provider URL directly and XA enabled connection factory is set to false.
migration to Weblogic 10.3.5_
With the same configurations MDB are not not getting deployed in weblogic 10 with some exception, so we removed the provider URL from weblogic-ejb-jar.xml and changed the JMS configuration to use foreign JMS and XA enable connection factory is set to true. Now when ever the JMS message is triggered Entity bean is not getting refreshed with the updated values. i.e values are stale.
Can some one look into this and provide your inputs to resolve this issue.

I think the Entity bean refresh problem appears to be unrelated to MDBs. The MDB is only responsible for getting the message to your application (which in turn interacts with Entity beans). You might want to try posting your question to an EJB newsgroup.
Tom

"Milky" or faint results when exporting from AE to FCP

(Accidently posted to FCP Express forum-- whoops!)
I've been using After Effects for years now to create graphics for our Avid projects, and the QT results have always been great. Clean, sharp moving graphics. But now that I've been using FCP, I'm not exactly happy when I export my Quicktime graphics from After Effects to FCP: they're extremely "milky" and faint/fuzzy when viewed from FCP over an NTSC monitor. I have tried various codecs when exporting: DV/NTSC, Animation, Component-- all with the same results.
I have read other threads with similar comments (even the thread that mentioned "milky" results when exporting from FCP to AE and back) but none of the suggestions/remarks helped in my situation.
I'm sure others have experienced this. Any suggestions?
Settings:
After Effects comp: NTSC/DV Preset (720 x 480, lower field, etc.)
Export Codecs: DV/DVCPro-NTSC, Animation, Component (all with the same milky results)
Final Cut: Sequence Preset "DV/NTSC 48 Khz"
Also tried using, as one thread suggested, the "Uncompressed 8 bit NTSC 48 Khz" preset and no difference
Side note: I'm using Final Cut in this system outputting to both DV video and Betacam video, using an Aja card for the Beta. Both DV and Beta results look the same (going straight thru the decks-to-NTSC monitor) and they both use the same "DV/NTSC 48 Khz" sequence preset-- except where I changed it to "Uncompressed 8 bit". If I use Animation or Component as my export codec from AE, naturally, I have to render to play the clip back in the timeline. It even looks milky or faint on the FCP source/viewer screens!
And yes, I've checked the NTSC monitor-- a Sony Trinitron PVM-20 monitor. And I've looked at the results on other monitors and even regular TVs. Milky/faint video all around.
Any suggestions would be appreciated!!

Is this on files with alpha channels? Have you tried
changing the Alpha type? Are you having
pre-multiplication problems?
No, they don't have alpha channels. But I did try, when rendering with Animation, changing the colors to "Millions +" which was something I read on another thread. Same results.
Basically, these are After Effects projects with simple backgrounds and moving text. I'm not doing any layering with alpha channels-- like lower third supers.
However, whenever I use Apple programs like LiveType or Motion, the NTSC results look like they did while I was creating the projects with these programs before I rendered them.

Is there a Maximum file size limit when combining pdf files

I am trying to combine files 8 PDF files created with i Explore using Acrobat XI Standard, the process is completed but when opening the file not all 8 individual files have been combined only the first two have been combined, the process shows all eight being read and combined.
I can open and view each of the original 8 individual files and read the content without any issue, the largest of the eight files is 15,559kb and the smallest is 9,435kb
if anyone can assist that would be most appreciated

Hi Tayls450,
This should not have happened as there is no maximum file size limit when combining PDFs.
Please let me know if there are some password protected PDFs also?
Also, I would suggest you to choose 'Repair Acrobat Installation' option from the Help menu.
Regards,
Anubha

Help!..CS4 IS INCREASING FILE SIZES.

Hi all
Wondered if anyone has had a problem with increased files sizes when opening a document up in Photoshop? Anything i open up is increased by two thirds in file size and i've no idea why ( e.g..8MB doc opens as 24MB doc)
What is even more strange is that it won't let me reduce a file size to anything under 1MB.
Has anyone ever come across this problem?...would appreciate any help.
Thanks
Bri

Hey Noel
Fair Play.
This is what is happening.
I’ve got a standard JPEG file that viewed in Explorer and Bridge reads as a 2.70MB (2838,796 bytes) file. Pixel dimensions 797x1000. Document size 6.75 x 8.47cm .Res 300 PPI.
When I open it in CS4 it reads 2.28MB. (This is the first thing I don’t understand)
Either way my simple( so I thought ) objective is to decrease the file size.
In the image size box I have re-set the resolution to 72ppi as I just need to post the image on a Website. My before and after calculations in the image Panel reads (was 2.28MB...now 134.3k)
Great! .this is what I want, However..... when I ‘save as’ and the JPEG compression box appears it has suddenly increased the file to 1.8MB Large file...and only allows me to reduce it to 1.7MB small file.
Admittedly this is not my area of expertise....I’m doing something wrong so any pointers would be much appreciated.
Bri

Increase File Size

After converting CR2 Raw files to Jpeg the size of the files is too small. How if possible Can one increase file size in Elements 9? Thanks

Why on earth do you want to have "larger" files?
JPG uses compression to reduce the size of the resulting files. If you're concerned about the picture quality because of JPG's lossy compression method, simply set the JPG "Quality" setting to its maximum.
Ken

HT201250 When migrating from time machine to my new hard drive, it migrates the first back-up I made several years ago. How can I migrate the latest back-up ?

When migrating from time machine to my new hard drive, it migrates the first back-up I made several years ago. How can I migrate the latest back-up ? I need time machine to migrate the latest back-up. Should I delete the older back-ups ?

As noondaywitch says, it should use the latest backup.
Where are your backups (external HD, Time Capsule, etc.)?
It sounds like there are two separate sets, and you're not connected to the right set.

Increase in CPU Utilization after migration from APEX 3.1.2 to APEX 3.2

Has any noticed any increase in CPU Utilization after migrating from APEX 3.1.2 to APEX 3.2?
Thanks,
Mark

Hi Mark,
Take a look at some of the usage reports within APEX (sessions, page views etc) to get an overall feel for where the time is being consumed.
You'll also find it useful if you can run a statspack report (or AWR, ASH etc) during a busy period to be able to drill down into where that CPU is being spent.
There's no magic answers here unfortunately, you need to track it down to where the time is being spent before working back up to find out where best to tune it.
John.
Blog: http://jes.blogs.shellprompt.net
Work: http://www.apex-evangelists.com
Author of Pro Application Express: http://tinyurl.com/3gu7cd
REWARDS: Please remember to mark helpful or correct posts on the forum, not just for my answers but for everyone!

Increased file size results when migrating from RH6 to RH7

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for