Increasing Report Loading Time

I am currently generating a report table through Visual Studio 9 and uploading it to our SQL Server. Before I go any further, I am a complete novice/beginner with this and it is my first time, so sorry if what i'm saying doesn't make complete sense. The
project deploys and I can open it, but it takes around 45 seconds to a minute to just load about 100 rows of data. What are some things that I can do to speed up this process?
Thanks in advance.

Hi TIGSlayer1,
In Reporting Services, the total time to generate a reporting server report (RDL) can be divided into 3 elements:
Time to retrieve the data (TimeDataRetrieval).
Time to process the report (TimeProcessing)
Time to render the report (TimeRendering)
Total time = (TimeDataRetrieval) + (TimeProcessing) + (TimeRendering)
Those 3 performance components are logged every time for which a deployed report is executed. This information can be found in the Executionlog view in the ReportServer database.
References:
Troubleshooting Reports: Report Performance
ExecutionLog2 View - Analyzing and Optimizing Reports
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Katherine Xiong
Katherine Xiong
TechNet Community Support

Similar Messages

Report (not Page) caching to improve report loading times

We are trying out Cystal Reports Server 2008 as a replacement for Crystal Reports CR XI R2 for an ASP.NET Web Application. Running some tests we found that the same report loaded from the server was far slower than loading the same report locally, using the CRXI SDK.
Being the Clone/Refresh strategy on the standalone SDK several times faster than the reportAppFactory.OpenDocument on the server platform, i think that the server is loading from scratch the report each time I execute the OpenDocument method. So what I am seraching for is, Is there a way to setup or tweak report caching on Crystal Server 2008? What I need is not page caching, but the whole report, which is used different databases each time it's executed (implying different data for each execution).
Some insight on the problem:
As I posted on a previous thread we are moving from CR XI due to a limit on the number of active instances suported by the SDK (74 instances). We reach this limit because of a workaround for improving report execution times, leaving instances of each report active, so the next execution just recicles the active instance, greatly reducing the overall process time. Therefor introducing Crystal Server is a setback on this module (due to it's actual performance).
Part of the problem resides on the complexity of the report. Using the standalone SDK the report takes several seconds to load from disk, and several seconds to execute. Regretably, we are not at liberty to change the reports' structure, so optimizing it is beyond posibility for now.
Thanks in advance,
Gustavo

Hello Maggie,
>> How can I get an all-encoompassing CSV file of the main report (Page 2014)?
This might be possible using the advanced print server configuration, with BI Publisher, using the same technique that is being used to print master-details reports (which is a type of a multi-region report) - http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/database/application_express/html/configure_printing.html . The standard print server configuration only supports reports with a single region. If you have BIP in your organization, that’s great. Otherwise, CSV files don’t warrant it.
The only other option, I can see, is to create the CSV file manually, using the technique described in the following Blog entry, by Scott Spendolini - http://spendolini.blogspot.com/2006/04/custom-export-to-csv.html .
Regards,
Arie.

Increase in Loading time for LV search in 2011

Initially when I loaded LV2011 my quick drop and the search took nearly 5 seconds but now it takes nearly 20 seconds to load so is there any reason for this kind of performance. Also I don't have anyother big software loaded or running in my PC. I have added few toolkits from VI package manager may be that is the reason?.
The best solution is the one you find it by yourself

RavensFan wrote:
In my message in the other thread, I commented that I thought 20 seconds wasn't all that long. But I thought you were commenting on the loading time for LabVIEW itself. That does seem like a long time for any of the internal LabVIEW dialogs to come up.
(Actually, I find several internal dialogs seem to take longer to load the first time then they should including the properties dialog. But not 20 seconds long.)
Hopefully, with this message thread in the LabVIEW forum, others can comment and offer suggestions on how to determine what the issue your having is.
Yes now I have plenty of toolkits ( Thanks for spotting me in the other thread )
Jeff you hit the bullseye. The loading was set as Load palette when needed.
Thanks
The best solution is the one you find it by yourself

Many Server Requests Increasing Page Load Time

Is there something that can be down on the server to cache
these files or something so that fewer requests have to be made?
One of my pages has almost 50 requests that I can see when I look
at the Net tab of Firebug...

"So, I guess there's nothing on the server that we can do to
help with
this?"
Not a lot. Depending on what web server you are using and
other factors
there are some ways to compress content before delivery so
that it takes
less bandwidth. But basically bandwidth is bandwidth and how
large a
web page and all its parts are will determine how long it
takes to
deliver from your server over all the intermediate
connections to the
client.
Other then make smaller more efficient pages, no there is not
a lot that
can be done.

Sudden increase in import time

On 9/6 I refreshed my database by exporting level 0 information,resetting the database, and importing the data back in. Theimport took 984 seconds. On 9/19, I performed the exact sameprocedure, and the import took 5,838 seconds. While I hadadded some dimension members in the meanwhile, as well as somedata, I can't see anything that would account for such a drasticincrease in import time. The size of the file on 9/6 was1,032,616 kb, and the file on 9/19 was 1,072,413 - not a bigdifference. Statistics on 9/6-------Statistics of Birdseye<img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-tongue.gif" border="0">lan1 ------- Dimension Name Type Declared Size Actual Size =================================================================== Accounts DENSE 2431 2254 Time Periods DENSE 23 14 Data Type SPARSE 8 8 Scenarios SPARSE 25 25 Versions SPARSE 5 5 Years SPARSE 7 7 Customer SPARSE 3281 2412 Product SPARSE 10786 10657 Commodity SPARSE 122 122 Dry - Frozen SPARSE 5 5 Family SPARSE 149 149 Label SPARSE 486 486 Number of dimensions : 12 Declared Block Size : 55913 Actual Block Size : 31556 Declared Maximum Blocks : 247722062000 Actual Maximum Blocks : 179932788000 Number of Non Missing Leaf Blocks : 373943 Number of Non Missing Non Leaf Blocks : 385909 Number of Total Blocks : 759852 Index Type : B+ TREE Average Block Density : 0.2448663 Average Sparse Density : 0.0004222977 Block Compression Ratio : 0.01842294 Average Clustering Ratio : 0.5076456 Average Fragmentation Quotient : 7.292331 Statistics on 9/19-------Statistics of Birdseye<img src="i/expressions/face-icon-small-tongue.gif" border="0">lan1 ------- Dimension Name Type Declared Size Actual Size =================================================================== Accounts DENSE 2431 2254 Time Periods DENSE 23 14 Data Type SPARSE 13 13 Scenarios SPARSE 25 25 Versions SPARSE 5 5 Years SPARSE 7 7 Customer SPARSE 3284 2414 Product SPARSE 10804 10660 Commodity SPARSE 122 122 Dry - Frozen SPARSE 5 5 Family SPARSE 149 149 Label SPARSE 486 486 Number of dimensions : 12 Declared Block Size : 55913 Actual Block Size : 31556 Declared Maximum Blocks : 403588822000 Actual Maximum Blocks : 292715605000 Number of Non Missing Leaf Blocks : 401337 Number of Non Missing Non Leaf Blocks : 437215 Number of Total Blocks : 838552 Index Type : B+ TREE Average Block Density : 0.2189758 Average Sparse Density : 0.0002864733 Block Compression Ratio : 0.01815302 Average Clustering Ratio : 0.5888489 Average Fragmentation Quotient : 3.811463 Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Looking at your statistics there is an increase in the dimensiion members, but that should NOT account for such a massive increase in loading time. 1.5 hours is just wrong.... Unless there is a problem in your database. Try validating it just to make sure that it is ok. On a different tack, it would be worth checking the network traffic and the job log to see whether there was anything else running that may have caused this to go slow. If you can't find anything, make a copy, and then try it on the copy, just to se if it was a 1 off issue, or if it is taking so long...

Issue with site load time when exported as HTML. Addressed?

Has the issue with website load time been addressed?
I believe the site attempts to load the entire image content at the initial visit - meaning any galleries with numerous pictures are all included when first getting to the site. This is causing a HUGE increase in load time. I was told when I last brought it up that it was an apparent issue that needed to be addressed.
Any type of resolution coming?
Site for reference: www.dkrecollection.com

Major updates of Muse are targeted to release roughly every quarter. The 1.0 release was in mid-May. The 2.0 release was in mid-August. A fundamental change to image loading would only appear as part of a major update due to the engineering and testing efforts required.
As provided in your previous thread http://forums.adobe.com/message/4659347#4659347 the only workaround until then is to reduce the number of images in the slideshow.

Slow report - loading the function masterReport.Load

Hi All,
We use the crystal report runtime 12 in a .net program,
we have a report that takes roughly a minute to run but 55 seconds of this is caused by a bottleneck on the feature masterReport.Load,
I am wondering if there is anyone who could explain what would cause this bottleneck and/or assist with the matter?
Many Thanks in Advance,
Gavin

Gavin, you say:
crystal report runtime 12 in a .net program, we have a report that takes roughly a minute to run but 55 seconds of this is caused by a bottleneck on the feature masterReport.Load,
But what is the performance of the report in the designer? E.g.; the runtime will not perform any better than the designer. If the performance is better in the designer by something like 5 or 10 seconds, then remember the total performance needs to be take into account. E.g.; load of report, db connection, view. E.g.; comparing from the time you you have logged on to the database and possibly filled out any parameters, is forgetting about the report load time, etc.
You also do not specify the CR 2008 Service Pack you are using...
- Ludek
Senior Support Engineer AGS Product Support, Global Support Center Canada
Follow us on Twitter

Movie Load Time Too Slow

Hello!
I've created three movies for a new website; all photo slide shows with 10-14 photos and some text. The photos have all been optimized in Photoshop and saved for web...most are under 100kb, however the movies are taking a long time to load on the webpages. Is there anything I can do through Edge Animate to reduce the load time? Even with the preloader, the load time is way too long. I've inserted the movies into the html pages using iframe. Any suggestions are much appreciated. Thanks!

Hi Simon,
I want to reduce Power View blank canvas / PowerView report load time from SSAS Tabular source in the SharePoint 2013 Portal.
I have observed that a PowerView report with 1 View, loads faster than a PowerView report with multiple (4) Views, so I think that your statement "Power View only retrieves the data it needs at any given time for a data visualization" might
be incorrect.
I have read the link you have provided and have all the patches applied, besides I am not using a Power Pivot source.
My tabular cube is complex and has about 200 measures, and the blank Power View canvas takes about 13 seconds to load in SharePoint 2013 URL from web browser. Appreciate if you can provide any insights here please.
Thanks, Ashish Singh

PowerView (SharePoint 2013) Load time too slow

I am using PowerView in SharePoint 2013 and when I access the SSAS 2012 Tabular Data Source through a "Report Data Source", the PowerView Canvas with the Field List takes a long while to load and the users get restless seeing the Blue spinning
wheel. I tested this on different tabular models and am seeing different results based on the complexity of the model.
Complex Model - 13 secs.
Adventure Works Model - 9 secs.
Very Simple Model (1 fact, 1 dim) - 8 secs.
I think if the model is complex then the engine takes a longer time to render the field list. How to get around this limitation and bring the blank canvas load time to under 5 secs.? I am curious to know if anyone has ever seen lesser load times in their
environment for the blank PowerView canvas and field lists.
Alternatively, If the field list loading takes time, is it possible to disable it? Because, I have already created dashboards for the end users in PowerView and do not want to load the field list if it is slowing down the entire experience.
Appreciate any guidance.
Thanks, Ashish Singh

Hi Simon,
I want to reduce Power View blank canvas / PowerView report load time from SSAS Tabular source in the SharePoint 2013 Portal.
I have observed that a PowerView report with 1 View, loads faster than a PowerView report with multiple (4) Views, so I think that your statement "Power View only retrieves the data it needs at any given time for a data visualization" might
be incorrect.
I have read the link you have provided and have all the patches applied, besides I am not using a Power Pivot source.
My tabular cube is complex and has about 200 measures, and the blank Power View canvas takes about 13 seconds to load in SharePoint 2013 URL from web browser. Appreciate if you can provide any insights here please.
Thanks, Ashish Singh

I just updated my RAM and I keep getting a crash report. I have a 21.5 Inch mid 2010 imac. I also am experiencing slow load times and when I try to open Final Cut it says that quartz extreme is not compatible and that I have no VRAM even though I do.

I just updated my RAM (replaced the two 2 gig cards with two Corsair 8 gig cards) and I keep getting a crash report. I have a 21.5 Inch mid 2010 imac. I also am experiencing slow load times with Photoshop and when I try to open Final Cut it says that quartz extreme is not compatible and that I have no VRAM even though I do.
Here is the crash report:
Interval Since Last Panic Report: 5426204 sec
Panics Since Last Report:          2
Anonymous UUID:                    2DD57DDB-BB42-5614-395A-CA6225BDAFD9
Wed Mar 20 11:36:53 2013
panic(cpu 0 caller 0xffffff801aa43d8e): "a freed zone element has been modified in zone: maps"@/SourceCache/xnu/xnu-2050.18.24/osfmk/kern/zalloc.c:219
Backtrace (CPU 0), Frame : Return Address
0xffffff81eb0eb950 : 0xffffff801aa1d626
0xffffff81eb0eb9c0 : 0xffffff801aa43d8e
0xffffff81eb0eba00 : 0xffffff801aa435d2
0xffffff81eb0ebae0 : 0xffffff801aa663f7
0xffffff81eb0ebb20 : 0xffffff801aa67398
0xffffff81eb0ebc70 : 0xffffff801aa6887c
0xffffff81eb0ebd20 : 0xffffff801ad5b8fe
0xffffff81eb0ebf50 : 0xffffff801ade182a
0xffffff81eb0ebfb0 : 0xffffff801aaced33
BSD process name corresponding to current thread: launchd
Mac OS version:
Not yet set
Kernel version:
Darwin Kernel Version 12.2.0: Sat Aug 25 00:48:52 PDT 2012; root:xnu-2050.18.24~1/RELEASE_X86_64
Kernel UUID: 69A5853F-375A-3EF4-9247-478FD0247333
Kernel slide:     0x000000001a800000
Kernel text base: 0xffffff801aa00000
System model name: iMac11,2 (Mac-F2238AC8)
System uptime in nanoseconds: 1070542822
last loaded kext at 707348380: com.apple.driver.AppleIRController    320.15 (addr 0xffffff7f9c53e000, size 28672)
loaded kexts:
at.obdev.nke.LittleSnitch    3908
com.apple.driver.AppleIRController    320.15
com.apple.driver.AppleUSBCardReader    3.1.0
com.apple.driver.AppleFileSystemDriver    3.0.1
com.apple.AppleFSCompression.AppleFSCompressionTypeDataless    1.0.0d1
com.apple.AppleFSCompression.AppleFSCompressionTypeZlib    1.0.0d1
com.apple.BootCache    34
com.apple.iokit.SCSITaskUserClient    3.5.1
com.apple.driver.XsanFilter    404
com.apple.iokit.IOAHCIBlockStorage    2.2.2
com.apple.driver.AppleUSBHub    5.2.5
com.apple.driver.AppleFWOHCI    4.9.6
com.apple.driver.AirPort.Atheros40    600.70.23
com.apple.driver.AppleUSBEHCI    5.4.0
com.apple.driver.AppleAHCIPort    2.4.1
com.apple.iokit.AppleBCM5701Ethernet    3.2.5b3
com.apple.driver.AppleUSBUHCI    5.2.5
com.apple.driver.AppleEFINVRAM    1.6.1
com.apple.driver.AppleACPIButtons    1.6
com.apple.driver.AppleRTC    1.5
com.apple.driver.AppleHPET    1.7
com.apple.driver.AppleSMBIOS    1.9
com.apple.driver.AppleACPIEC    1.6
com.apple.driver.AppleAPIC    1.6
com.apple.driver.AppleIntelCPUPowerManagementClient    196.0.0
com.apple.nke.applicationfirewall    4.0.39
com.apple.security.quarantine    2
com.apple.driver.AppleIntelCPUPowerManagement    196.0.0
com.apple.iokit.IOUSBHIDDriver    5.2.5
com.apple.iokit.IOSCSIBlockCommandsDevice    3.5.1
com.apple.iokit.IOUSBMassStorageClass    3.5.0
com.apple.driver.AppleUSBMergeNub    5.2.5
com.apple.driver.AppleUSBComposite    5.2.5
com.apple.iokit.IOSCSIMultimediaCommandsDevice    3.5.1
com.apple.iokit.IOBDStorageFamily    1.7
com.apple.iokit.IODVDStorageFamily    1.7.1
com.apple.iokit.IOCDStorageFamily    1.7.1
com.apple.iokit.IOAHCISerialATAPI    2.5.0
com.apple.iokit.IOSCSIArchitectureModelFamily    3.5.1
com.apple.iokit.IOUSBUserClient    5.2.5
com.apple.iokit.IOFireWireFamily    4.5.5
com.apple.iokit.IO80211Family    500.15
com.apple.iokit.IOAHCIFamily    2.2.1
com.apple.iokit.IOEthernetAVBController    1.0.2b1
com.apple.iokit.IONetworkingFamily    3.0
com.apple.iokit.IOUSBFamily    5.4.0
com.apple.driver.AppleEFIRuntime    1.6.1
com.apple.iokit.IOHIDFamily    1.8.0
com.apple.iokit.IOSMBusFamily    1.1
com.apple.security.sandbox    220
com.apple.kext.AppleMatch    1.0.0d1
com.apple.security.TMSafetyNet    7
com.apple.driver.DiskImages    344
com.apple.iokit.IOStorageFamily    1.8
com.apple.driver.AppleKeyStore    28.21
com.apple.driver.AppleACPIPlatform    1.6
com.apple.iokit.IOPCIFamily    2.7.2
com.apple.iokit.IOACPIFamily    1.4
com.apple.kec.corecrypto    1.0
Model: iMac11,2, BootROM IM112.0057.B00, 2 processors, Intel Core i3, 3.2 GHz, 16 GB, SMC 1.64f5
Graphics: ATI Radeon HD 5670, ATI Radeon HD 5670, PCIe, 512 MB
Memory Module: BANK 0/DIMM1, 8 GB, DDR3, 1333 MHz, 0x029E, 0x434D5341384758334D314131333333433920
Memory Module: BANK 1/DIMM1, 8 GB, DDR3, 1333 MHz, 0x029E, 0x434D5341384758334D314131333333433920
AirPort: spairport_wireless_card_type_airport_extreme (0x168C, 0x8F), Atheros 9280: 4.0.70.23-P2P
Bluetooth: Version 4.0.9f33 10885, 2 service, 18 devices, 0 incoming serial ports
Network Service: AirPort, AirPort, en1
Serial ATA Device: ST31000528AS, 1 TB
Serial ATA Device: HL-DT-STDVDRW GA32N
USB Device: hub_device, 0x0424 (SMSC), 0x2514, 0xfd100000 / 2
USB Device: IR Receiver, apple_vendor_id, 0x8242, 0xfd120000 / 4
USB Device: Built-in iSight, apple_vendor_id, 0x8502, 0xfd110000 / 3
USB Device: hub_device, 0x0424 (SMSC), 0x2514, 0xfa100000 / 2
USB Device: BRCM2046 Hub, 0x0a5c (Broadcom Corp.), 0x4500, 0xfa110000 / 4
USB Device: Bluetooth USB Host Controller, apple_vendor_id, 0x8215, 0xfa111000 / 6
USB Device: Internal Memory Card Reader, apple_vendor_id, 0x8403, 0xfa120000 / 3

There have been a few reports on here where Corsair RAM seems to have caused users a lot of grief with crashes.
The recommendation on here, mostly, is to only buy RAM from macsales.com or crucial.com as they guarantee their modules will work and offer a no quibble lifetime guarantee.
I'd put the original RAM back in, return the Corsair chips for a refund and re-order from one of those two companies.
http://eshop.macsales.com/shop/apple/memory/iMac
http://www.crucial.com/

Very slow loading time - Crystal Reports Viewer 2008

Hi,
I search this forum to find another thread regarding this issue. Since I've found nothing in particular, I started this one.
We are currently developping a new report engine based on the .Net Crystal Report Viewer. This engine will be used in our applications to show, print and export reports. We based the engine on the Crystal Report 2008 version (12.0.2000). The code is in C#, targeted on the Framework 3.5 SP1. For the CR runtime, we tested on machines with the SP2 and SP3 versions, as well as on a computer with Crystal Report Developper installed (v12.3.0.601) with no runtimes. Since the runtime is in x86 only, the engine is compiled in x86 (not ANY CPU)
When we try to open a report in an application, the first report loading is unusally slower than the others. If I open a report, close it and open it a second time, the second time is much faster than the first. While reading the threads, I realized that the first load implies some assembly loading from the Framework (which is normal).
But since i can take as long as 20-30 seconds to load the first report, I ran some test. Using the System.AppDomain.CurrentDomain.AssemblyLoad event, I've tracked the assemblies being loaded when opening the report and the start time of the loading. I've discovered that, while most of the CR assemblies takes less than 500 milliseconds to load, there is one that takes at least 3 seconds (20 seconds sometimes) to load : BusinessObjects.Licensing.KeyCodeDecoder. Each time I ran the tests, it is the assembly that is the slowest (and by far) among them all.
Prior to this, we were using Delphi with the Crystal Report 10 runtime. We never had such issues. Now, some customers are complaining about this behavior.
For you information, we are using the ReportDocument.Load() method to load documents. Our reports are all dynamically linked to the database with the DataSourceConnections.SetConnection() method. The report is being loaded in the viewer using the CrystalReportViewer.ReportSource property.
Why does it takes so long to load/execute ? Is there something implied with registry keys or Internet access ? Is there a way to speed up things ?
Thanks !

Thanks for your help Don ! :o)
I know that the CR10 runtime was built on win32 and while I knew that the .Net version of the runtime would be slower due to the Framework and .Net architecture, we did not expect such differences between the two methods.
You are right that the hardware could play a great factor here, but since I work on this machine for a few years now and I saw the performance from the old CRPE32.dll and the new .Net counterpart, I am really surprised that there is such a difference. Most of our customers have entry-level desktops and our application always ran well on it, until now.
So, if it is the way that the CR 2008 runtime works, do you know if your developpers optimized this part with the next version (CR 2010) or it is based on the same engine ?
Thanks again for your time !

Report RPTARQPOST keeps increasing in the time it takes to run

Hi
Since we have implemented Leave Requestes using ESS/MSS this report has increased from taking 300 seconds to run to taking 1000 seconds currently. I need advices as to what can be causing this report to increase its running time?
Any advice will be appreciated. System : ECC6 SP Stack 19
Regards
Duvan

read the note 1460527
check teh size of PTREQ_HEADER and ensure its not getting large
The status ERROR is assigned to a request if it cannot be posted in a
run of the report RPTARQPOST. There are three main reasons for this:
1: The personnel number is locked.
2: There is a collision.
3: The quota is insufficient.
The first reason does not constitute a problem because the request is
posted in the next run in this case.
The two other reasons must be resolved by an administrator. However,
these situations can only occur if an absence is entered using a
different procedure after the creation of the request.
If these requests in the status ERROR or the collision reason are not
removed, the report RPTARQPOST tries to post these requests in each run,
but this is unsuccessful. The performance deteriorates as a result.
You can use two indicators in the report RPTARPOST to solve this
problem:
The "Post with Infotype Match" option ensures that leave requests that
have already been created as absences are automatically marked as
posted. This is useful if absences are sometimes manually entered in
parallel in spite of the automatic posting. In this case, the system
does not recognize the collision and posts the request.
The "Ignore for Posting" option ensures that all ERROR requests are
ignored. You can use this workaround at the start, but all ERROR
requests are retained, even the requests from point 1 that would be
normally posted otherwise.
Page 2
For a final solution, an analysis as to why so many ERROR requests are
created in the system must be performed because, usually, only a few
ERROR requests should be created as a result of the manual entry of
absences.

Increase Adf Application Load Time

We have identified that ADF application is taking very long time to load at very first time , it is taking time to load the images,css and java script files ..
only after all these resources are downloaded, then it is starting to load the page..
Is there a way to load the page (displaying content on browser) in spite of waiting complete dom is ready. (domConetntLoaded).?
Is there any why to increase the page load time.?

User, tell us your jdev version, please!
The framework loads some content up front, which takes time. There are some techniques you can use to reduce this time like http://www.ateam-oracle.com/improving-adf-page-rendering-time/
or resource losing servlet which can cache calls and deliver images or other stuff faster.
Timo

Sudden increase in webpage loading time

I´ve had a Mac Mini (1 Gig of RAM) for over three years. It´s connected to a router Zyxel Prestige 660HW-61 via Ethernet. My internet connection is 3 Mbps down. Web surfing has been fine until last week when I noticed a sudden and dramatic increase in the time web pages took to load, to the extent that they fail to load more often than not.
When browsing threads for possible causes, I found this one: http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2059511&start=0&tstart=0
As suggested by Boece, I restarted my Mini and run nothing but Safari (4.x) and Activity Monitor to watch the outs-to-ins ratio while Safari tried to load a page. Page outs remained at 0% for the duration of the test (around 40 minutes testing sites such as IMDB and Youtube and running a few google searches)
Next I installed Firefox (3.5) and Camino and run the same test to see how my DNS setup performed. Page outs remained at 0% again and page-loading time was painfully slow with the new browsers.
Time to switch over to OpenDNS. I installed the OpenDNS domain name servers in both the router and the Mini instead of those provided by my ISP, restarted the Mini and run the same tests with Safari, Firefox and Camino. Unfortunately, I didn´t notice any improvements at all.
I´m not aware of any anti-virus or malicious-website protection software installed on the Mini or in the browsers.
I don´t have MS Office installed and only one Dashboard widget (iStats Pro)
Web surfing is fine with my Dell laptop and donwload speeds with the Mini, though I´ve been unable to test them via websites (pages failed to load), seem fine after having downloaded a few bittorrent files using Transmission.
Whatever the problem, it also applies, perhaps not surprisingly, to MacTubes. It fails to both play and download youtube videos.
Any other suggestions? Thanks in advance for your help.

I´ve had a Mac Mini (1 Gig of RAM) for over three years. It´s connected to a router Zyxel Prestige 660HW-61 via Ethernet. My internet connection is 3 Mbps down. Web surfing has been fine until last week when I noticed a sudden and dramatic increase in the time web pages took to load, to the extent that they fail to load more often than not.
When browsing threads for possible causes, I found this one: http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=2059511&start=0&tstart=0
As suggested by Boece, I restarted my Mini and run nothing but Safari (4.x) and Activity Monitor to watch the outs-to-ins ratio while Safari tried to load a page. Page outs remained at 0% for the duration of the test (around 40 minutes testing sites such as IMDB and Youtube and running a few google searches)
Next I installed Firefox (3.5) and Camino and run the same test to see how my DNS setup performed. Page outs remained at 0% again and page-loading time was painfully slow with the new browsers.
Time to switch over to OpenDNS. I installed the OpenDNS domain name servers in both the router and the Mini instead of those provided by my ISP, restarted the Mini and run the same tests with Safari, Firefox and Camino. Unfortunately, I didn´t notice any improvements at all.
I´m not aware of any anti-virus or malicious-website protection software installed on the Mini or in the browsers.
I don´t have MS Office installed and only one Dashboard widget (iStats Pro)
Web surfing is fine with my Dell laptop and donwload speeds with the Mini, though I´ve been unable to test them via websites (pages failed to load), seem fine after having downloaded a few bittorrent files using Transmission.
Whatever the problem, it also applies, perhaps not surprisingly, to MacTubes. It fails to both play and download youtube videos.
Any other suggestions? Thanks in advance for your help.

SSRS report taking time to load the data

Hello Everyone,
I have create SSRS report get data using web service. When i run the web service methods its gives me result instantly, But when i run the report it takes lot time to load data in SSRS report. some times in SharePoint page it shows time out error.
Could you please tell me why SSRS report lots of time to load data.
Thank You.

Have a look at ExecutionLog tables in report server database to get an idea of which step is taking more time.
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/crm/archive/2008/11/19/auditing-report-execution-using-the-reportserver-database.aspx
Please Mark This As Answer if it helps to solve the issue Visakh ---------------------------- http://visakhm.blogspot.com/ https://www.facebook.com/VmBlogs

Increasing Report Loading Time

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for