Increasing TFTP block size for 2960 series switches

I have read that some Cisco components can increase the default TFTP block size to values greater than 512 bytes by using the command -
ip tftp blocksize xxxx
This doesn't seem to be available on Cisco 2960 series switches. Is there a way to do this with the 2960's?

I have moved a WS-C2960-24LC-S running LanLite to 12.2(55)SE9 - the current end of the line for this switch - and indeed the command is not present. Sooo....this appears to be a limitation of LanLite.
My predecessor implemented about 70 switches with LanLite. I put a stop to this about a year ago but it is going to take some time to flush them out of the inventory.
Thanks for your response.

Similar Messages

  • What are the New IOS Versions available for 2960 series Switches?

    Hi all,
    can anybody give the details about it?
    thanks,
    Haribabu.

    15.0(1)SE is the latest-and-greatest IOS.  Unfortunately, I personally wouldn't recommend this to anyone because this version has a memory leak that affects switches even before configs are loaded.
    Next is the 12.2(58)SE2.  This is so-so.  The earlier version has a memory leak similar (not the same) as the 15.0(1)SE but it is triggered differently.
    12.2(55)SE4 is probably the most stable of the "new" versions. 

  • ORA-00349: failure obtaining block size for '+Z'  in Oracle XE

    Hello,
    I am attempting to move the online redo log files to a new flash recovery area location created on network drive "Z" ( Oracle Database 10g Express Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0).
    When I run @?/sqlplus/admin/movelogs; in SQL*Plus as a local sysdba, I get the following errors:
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-00349: failure obtaining block size for '+Z'
    ORA-06512: at line 14
    Please let me know how to go about resolving this issue.
    Thank you.
    See below for detail:
    Connected.
    SQL> @?/sqlplus/admin/movelogs;
    SQL> Rem
    SQL> Rem $Header: movelogs.sql 19-jan-2006.00:23:11 banand Exp $
    SQL> Rem
    SQL> Rem movelogs.sql
    SQL> Rem
    SQL> Rem Copyright (c) 2006, Oracle. All rights reserved.
    SQL> Rem
    SQL> Rem NAME
    SQL> Rem movelogs.sql - move online logs to new Flash Recovery Area
    SQL> Rem
    SQL> Rem DESCRIPTION
    SQL> Rem This script can be used to move online logs from old online
    log
    SQL> Rem location to Flash Recovery Area. It assumes that the database
    SQL> Rem instance is started with new Flash Recovery Area location.
    SQL> Rem
    SQL> Rem NOTES
    SQL> Rem For use to rename online logs after moving Flash Recovery
    Area.
    SQL> Rem The script can be executed using following command
    SQL> Rem sqlplus '/ as sysdba' @movelogs.sql
    SQL> Rem
    SQL> Rem MODIFIED (MM/DD/YY)
    SQL> Rem banand 01/19/06 - Created
    SQL> Rem
    SQL>
    SQL> SET ECHO ON
    SQL> SET FEEDBACK 1
    SQL> SET NUMWIDTH 10
    SQL> SET LINESIZE 80
    SQL> SET TRIMSPOOL ON
    SQL> SET TAB OFF
    SQL> SET PAGESIZE 100
    SQL> declare
    2 cursor rlc is
    3 select group# grp, thread# thr, bytes/1024 bytes_k
    4 from v$log
    5 order by 1;
    6 stmt varchar2(2048);
    7 swtstmt varchar2(1024) := 'alter system switch logfile';
    8 ckpstmt varchar2(1024) := 'alter system checkpoint global';
    9 begin
    10 for rlcRec in rlc loop
    11 stmt := 'alter database add logfile thread ' ||
    12 rlcRec.thr || ' size ' ||
    13 rlcRec.bytes_k || 'K';
    14 execute immediate stmt;
    15 begin
    16 stmt := 'alter database drop logfile group ' || rlcRec.grp;
    17 execute immediate stmt;
    18 exception
    19 when others then
    20 execute immediate swtstmt;
    21 execute immediate ckpstmt;
    22 execute immediate stmt;
    23 end;
    24 execute immediate swtstmt;
    25 end loop;
    26 end;
    27 /
    declare
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-00349: failure obtaining block size for '+Z'
    ORA-06512: at line 14
    Can someone point me in the right direction as to what I may be doing wrong here - Thank you!

    888442 wrote:
    I am trying to drop and recreate ONLINE redo logs on my STANDB DATABASE (11.1.0.7)., but i am getting the below error.
    On primary, we have done the changes., ie we added new logfile with bigger size and 3 members. When trying to do the same on Standby we are getting this error.
    Our database is in Active DG Read only mode and the oracle version is 11.1.0.7.
    I have deffered the log apply and cancelled the managed recovery, and dg is in manual mode.
    SQL> alter database Add LOGFILE GROUP 4 ('+DT_DG1','+DT_DG2','+DT_DG3') SIZE 1024M;
    alter database Add LOGFILE GROUP 4 ('+DT_DG1','+DT_DG2','+DT_DG3') SIZE 1024M
    ERROR at line 1:
    ORA-00349: failure obtaining block size for '+DT_DG1'First why you are dropping & recreating online redo log files on standby.
    On standby only standby redo log files will be used. Not sure what you are trying to do.
    here is example how to create online redo log files, Check that diskgroup is mounted and have sufficient space to create.
    sys@ORCL> select member from v$logfile;
    MEMBER
    C:\ORACLE\ORADATA\ORCL\REDO03.LOG
    C:\ORACLE\ORADATA\ORCL\REDO02.LOG
    C:\ORACLE\ORADATA\ORCL\REDO01.LOG
    sys@ORCL> alter database add logfile group 4 (
      2     'C:\ORACLE\ORADATA\ORCL\redo_g01a.log',
      3     'C:\ORACLE\ORADATA\ORCL\redo_g01b.log',
      4     'C:\ORACLE\ORADATA\ORCL\redo_g01c.log') size 10m;
    Database altered.
    sys@ORCL> select member from v$logfile;
    MEMBER
    C:\ORACLE\ORADATA\ORCL\REDO03.LOG
    C:\ORACLE\ORADATA\ORCL\REDO02.LOG
    C:\ORACLE\ORADATA\ORCL\REDO01.LOG
    C:\ORACLE\ORADATA\ORCL\REDO_G01A.LOG
    C:\ORACLE\ORADATA\ORCL\REDO_G01B.LOG
    C:\ORACLE\ORADATA\ORCL\REDO_G01C.LOG
    6 rows selected.
    sys@ORCL>
    Your profile:-
    888442      
         Newbie
    Handle:      888442
    Status Level:      Newbie
    Registered:      Sep 29, 2011
    Total Posts:      12
    Total Questions:      8 (7 unresolved)
    Close the threads if answered, Keep the forum clean.

  • Is there a way to increase the font size for the "songs" and "artists" lists in the new music app for iPad 2 (iOS 5)? It is too small for me.

    Is there a way to increase the font size for the "songs" and "artists" lists in the "music" app for iPad 2 (iOS 5)? It is smaller than the previous version.

    falkner09 wrote:
    is there really no fix for this?
    It would depend on your definition of "Fix"
    Your iPod touch running OS 4.2 has a ZOOM feature which will enable you to see the screen more clearly.
    To turn Zoom on or off got to:
    Settings > General > Accessibility > Zoom and tap the Zoom On/Off switch.
    _To Zoom in or out_:
    Double-tap the screen with three fingers. By default, the screen is magnified 200 percent. If you manually change the magnification (by using the tap-and-drag gesture, described below), iPod touch automatically returns to that magnification when you zoom in by double-tapping with three fingers.
    Increase magnification: With three fingers, tap and drag toward the top of the screen (to increase magnification) or toward the bottom of the screen (to decrease magnification). The tap-and-drag gesture is similar to a double-tap, except you don’t lift your fingers on the second tap—instead, drag your fingers on the screen. Once you start dragging, you can drag with a single finger.
    _Move around the screen_:
    When zoomed in, drag or flick the screen with three fingers. Once you start dragging, you can drag with a single finger so that you can see more of the screen. Hold a single finger near the edge of the display to pan to that side of the screen image. Move your finger closer to the edge to pan more quickly. When you open a new screen, Zoom always goes to the top-middle of the screen.
    _Large Text_:
    Large Text lets you make the text larger in alerts, and in Calendar, Contacts, Mail, Messages, and Notes. You can choose 20-point, 24-point, 32-point, 40-point, 48-point, or 56-point text.
    Set the text size: In Settings, choose General > Accessibility, tap Large Text, then tap the text size you want.
    I hope this has helped a little - other than this option I think it pretty much is what it is.
    BTW - This information can be found on page 208 of the iPod Touch iOS 4.2 Users Guide.
    Best wishes..
    Ricky

  • Is it possible? "automatically increasing text block size when typing?"

    I want to know that:  "automatically increasing text block size when typing?" This works exactly in Freehand 10, 11.
    is it possible?
    Thanks.

    Smart Text Reflow was added to CS4, which might also be of interest to you.
    Adobe does, in fact listen to customer requests for new and improved features. Not all requests can be satisfied during each release cycle, but if you have a suggestion, you should file it at Adobe - Feature Request/Bug Report Form

  • Choosing block size for RAID 0 & Final Cut

    Hi.
    I now have 3 500GB internal Seagate drives in bays 2/3/4 and want to make a striped 1.5TB RAID to use with Final Cut Studio 2. The help page talks about choosing a "large" data block size for use with video, but makes no specific size suggestion. What value would you recommend that I select for the block size? I haven't been in there yet so I don't know what the choices are.
    Any other settings I should be aware of that will optimize the RAID performance for video capture and editing? Thanks!
    Fred
    Message was edited by: FredGarvin
    Message was edited by: FredGarvin

    If you're using Disc Utility to set up your RAID, when you go to the RAID tab, you'll see an options button near the bottom of the window... clicking this will open a small menu where you can set the data block size... the largest is 256K, which is what you'd want to use.
    As for you're other question... have a look at this website: http://bytepile.com/raid_class.php
    note that disc utility can only set up RAID 0 & RAID 1 (if i remember rightly).

  • Default block size for UFS format in OSX?

    Hi,
    I formatted an external drive as "unix format" (UFS) using Disk Utility, which subsequently became unrecognizable by the firewire controller. Now in a Unix box, the superblock of this drive is coming up as corrupted or nonexistent. Does anyone know where I can find the default block size for UFS in os x? I need to specify a backup superblock. Thanks!
    -Dan

    If it is just scratch, run some benchmarks with it set to 128k and 256k and see how it feels with each. The default is too small, though some find it acceptable for small images. For larger files you want larger - and for PS scratch you definitely want 128 or 256k.

  • Using large block sizes for index and table spaces

    " You are not using large blocksizes for your index tablespaces. Oracle research proves that indexes will build flatter tree structures in larger blocksizes.
    Is this a generic statement that I can use for all tables or indexes? I also have batch and online activity. My primary target is batch and it should not impact online. Not sure if both have common tables.
    How to find the current block size used for tables and index? is there a v$parameter query?
    What is an optimal block size value for batch?
    How do I know when flatter tree str has been achieved using above changes? Is there a query to determine this?
    What about tables, what is the success criterion for tables. can we use the same flat tree str criterion? Is there a query for this?

    user3390467 wrote:
    " You are not using large blocksizes for your index tablespaces. Oracle research proves that indexes will build flatter tree structures in larger blocksizes.
    Is this a generic statement that I can use for all tables or indexes? This is a generic statement used by some consultants. Unfortunately, it is riddled with exceptions and other considerations.
    One consultant in particular seems to have anecdotal evidence that using different block sizes for index (big) and data (small) can yield almost miraculous improvements. However, that can not be backed up due to NDA. Many of the rest of us can not duplicate the improvements, and indeed some find situations where that results in a degradation (esp with high insert/update rates from separated transactions).
    I also have batch and online activity. My primary target is batch and it should not impact online. Not sure if both have common tables.
    How to find the current block size used for tables and index? is there a v$parameter query?
    What is an optimal block size value for batch?
    How do I know when flatter tree str has been achieved using above changes? Is there a query to determine this?
    What about tables, what is the success criterion for tables. can we use the same flat tree str criterion? Is there a query for this?I'd strongly recommend that you
    1) stop using generic tools to analyze specific problems
    2) define you problem in detail ()what are you really trying to accomplish - seems like performance tuning, but you never really state that)
    3) define the OS and DB version - in detail. Give rev levels and patch levels.
    If you are having a serious performance issue, I strongly recommend you look at some performance tuning specialists like "http://www.method-r.com/", "http://www.miracleas.dk/", "http://www.hotsos.com/", "http://www.pythian.com/", or even Oracle's Performance Tuning consultants. Definitely worth the price of admission.

  • Optimal Block Size for Xserve's RAID hosting Final Cut Server

    What would be the optimal block size for the software RAID on the machine that will be hosting Final Cut Server? The default is 36K. Since FCS is essentially a database, would be the optimal settings? Any glimpse what data size chunks FCS write to the disk?

    Actually I meant the block size for the internal startup volume where FCS is installed, not Xsan volumes. As to optimal settings for Xsan volumes it really depends on the type of the data you store on Xsan, and if it is primarily video, what format: SD, HD.

  • Optimal NTFS block size for Oracle 11G on Windows 2008 R2 (OLTP)

    Hi All,
    We are currently setting up an Oracle 11G instance on a Windows 2008 R2 server and were looking to see if there was an optimal NTFS block size. I've read the following: http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/win.112/e10845/specs.htm
    But it only mentioned the block sizes that can be used (2k - 16k). And basically what i got out of it, was the different block szes affect the max # of database files possible for each database.
    Is there an optimal NTFS block size for Oracle 11G OLTP system on Windows?
    Thanks in advance

    Is there an optimal NTFS block size for Oracle 11G OLTP system on Windows?ideally FS block size should be equal to Oracle tablespace block size.
    or at least be N times less than Oracle block size.
    For example - if Oracle BS=8K then NTFS BS better to be 8K but also can be 4K or 2K.
    Also both must be 1 to N times of Disk sector size. Older disks had sectors 512 bytes.
    Contemporary HDDs have internal sector size 4K. Usually.

  • RAID block size for final cut pro x

    Just got one of the new late 2012 27" iMacs and a 6 TB LaCie Thunderbolt drive. Can finally edit the video I took last spring. I'll be using Final Cut Pro X, and doing a lot of multicam stuff with 4 or 5 views and a separate audio track. The LaCie came formatted as a mirrored RAID. I'm going to change that to 0 (Striped RAID set), but am wondering what block size to set. The default is 32k, but I have read that this ought to be increased to the max (256k) for video editing. I have also read it should NOT be increased. And the posts I have read have all been at least 3 years old. So let me ask you all--what block size would you recommend for my situation?
    Thanks in advance!

    Hi Eddie...
    This depends on what kind of source footage you are editing....
    For compressed Video, Audio and Uncompressed audio 128k
    I have only had BAD results with 256k. 64 is also weird. Whereas 32 is fine.
    All my RAIDs have 128k for audio/video editing
    you can go further if you editing Image Sequences.. but according to my own findings and I have been dealing with raid since years.... 128k does the job the best.
    Rule of thumb.... The smaller the file sizes you are putting the RAID the smaller the block size. And vice versa.
    I.e. You would cripple the raid performance if storing a database on it, having a block size of 256. In case of servers and OS 32k would be a good choice, perhaps even 16k if supported.

  • Cisco 2960 Series Switch Architecture

    Hi all,
    I wanted to know if there is a document or an article which describes 2960 series architecture specifically for model WS-C2960-24-S as there is for 2600 series in the following link:
    http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/routers/2600-series-multiservice-platforms/23852-2600-architecture-23852.html
    Thanks.

    Hi,
    You should be able to find the information that you need here:
    http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/switches/catalyst-2960-24-s-switch/model.html
    Thanks,
    Jake

  • Change block size for several log-files simultaneously?

    Hi,
    I'm using SignalExpress to record and analyze data.
    Sometimes I want to analyze the recorded data both for a short period of time and for longer time.
    (Imagine creating an average of every second first and then an average of every 10 seconds)
    Then I need to change all the log-files, and also the specific parts of the log-file. See attachment.
    I have sometimes up to 1000 log-files containing signals from 4 different modules, that makes 4000 adjustments to change from block size 10000 to block size 1000.
    Is there any way to adjust all the log-files block size at once?
    Many thanks!
    Anders Hansson
    Engineer
    Attachments:
    NI.JPG ‏95 KB

    Hi,
    Is't anyone else interested in a solution for this operation?
    I reported this to the NI-feedback service and they adviced me to report/request advice here to get a quicker reply.
    So...
    Best regards
    Ingenjör Hansson

  • Need rack ears for SR224 series switch. Please help.

    I need a pair of rack ears for an SR224 series switch. (11-inch wide chassis)
    Please direct me to a part-number and a source.
    Thank you!

    You have posted exactly the same question on the WAN Routing and Switching forum where it has already gotten some response. I suggest that we consolidate any discussion to that forum.
    HTH
    Rick

  • Recommended Block Size For RAID 0

    I am setting up a RAID configuration (Striping, no Parity, Mac G5, OS-X) and was curious what the recommended Block Size should be. Content is primarily (but not limited to) Images created with Adobe Photoshop CS2 and range in size from 1.5MB to >20MB. The default for OS-X is 32K chunks of data.
    Drives are External FW-400.
    Many thanks, and Happy Holidays to all!

    If it is just scratch, run some benchmarks with it set to 128k and 256k and see how it feels with each. The default is too small, though some find it acceptable for small images. For larger files you want larger - and for PS scratch you definitely want 128 or 256k.

Maybe you are looking for