InDesign CS2 - 100 document limit and compatibility with newer versions

Hello,
I have Adobe InDesign CS2 and am using it to compile a large report. I have come across a problem once i tried to add more than 100 documents to my book and now see there is a 100 file limit to books in CS2. Each document needs to stay as a single file so i am unable to join files to overcome this problem.
I have a summary table at the beginning of the document detailing the title of each file in the book. I am unable to work out how to create page hyperlinks in the pdf to the second book (documents over the 100 mark).
It has since come to fruition that my company has updates to CS3 and CS5 and that these new versions do not have a 100 file limit in creating books. This document i am creating is over 400 pages long so i am wary of upgrading to a new version when i am not far from publishing.
Should i have any concerns in upgrading to a new version of InDesign when i have almost finished my report? Would it be better to just upgrade to CS3 and not make such a large jump to CS5? Or does anyone know how to create page hyperlinks in my pdf to the files contained in the second book?
Thanks for any help! Much appreciated.

Normally I would advise against changing versions in midstream on a project like this, but I'm not sure you have a choice. My instinct is there will be fewer issues moving to CS3 than CS5, but there are far more features in CS5 you might like to use...
One way to limit the possible anomalies would be to export all the CS2 files to .inx na open those in CS5, rather than converting the .indd files directly, then save as new CS5 .indd files and add to a new book. One very serious issue you may run into wehn moving to a later version is that the text engines are updated and text won't necessarily flow exactly the same, particualry justified text, which can cause line endings to move and some paragraphs may gain or lose a line, which can have a really devastating effect on a long doc if it causes a page count to shift. The killer is that the changes normally don't happen until you start to edit text in that story. I believe the .inx route will force a recompose on opening, but I'm not dead certain, so take a look at http://indesignsecrets.com/force-text-reflow-when-indesign-forgets-to-flow-the-text.php to see how to force the recompose manually as soon as you open the file (you'd only need to do it once, before saving in the new version, for each file), then check carefully for oversets or other problems. Live preflight in CS5 can help with that.
As you can tell, a successful move to a newer version is likely to be a lot of careful work preparing and checking the files. Some of it can be automated (the export to .inx, the recompose, and the save in the new version) by scripting, but in all honesty you're going to need to check every page when you are done.
One of the others who uses Hyperlinks will need to weigh in on ID's native abilities and linking to other files in a book. I know that doing that with cross-references (which don't even exist natively prior to CS4) is extremely likely to break down at some point and leave you trying to remake them all, and large numbers of links across docs is likely to slow CS5 in particular to a crawl unless all files (at least the ones to which there are links in the doc you are editing) in the book are open.

Similar Messages

  • Gray ! on 100 records when I sync with new version of iTunes 10.2.1.1

    I have a Ipod classic 30g. I have 4079 songs in my iTunes. I am using Windows 7 on an ACER Extensa. I have my music on an external hard drive. The same place it has always been. Since I upgraded to the new version of iTunes when I sync my Ipod it randomly marks 100 records with the gray circle with a ! in it. Showing that it is not connected. I check the songs are still on the drive in the same location. I go into the control panel of my computer use the repair function and all the ! are gone. As soon as I try to sync iTunes selects 100 songs and does not sync them to my Ipod. After the first time I added more songs and there was no change to the number of songs not synced. Any suggestions?

    I only have songs no other media. The specs for my Ipod say it should hold 7500 songs. This problem only started after upgrading to the newest version of iTunes 10.2.1.1

  • App Files Saved as XML and Working with New Versions

    We work with app data in the form of array of large clusters and use LV Anything to XML conversion VIs to save to disk.
    The problem is when new app versions are developed and changes are made to the cluster format; we want the customer to be able to open the old version saved XML file format.
    Usually the saved cluster (in XML) has be changed by adding/removing a field or even changing the options of a ring control for example.
    The app name and version is stored in the XML.
    Question: Is there a way of easily working with XML file formats with slightly different fields?
    In the past we have worked with the raw XML text by searching for fields which are different and modifying them accordingly so they are accepted by the new file format.
    Any tips would be greatly appreciated.

    battler. wrote:
    I have written a software name and version cluster to XML.  How do you read the version field in the XML?  Do you use string search?  Is there a better way?
    Yes, I use String Search (because it is near the beginning of the XML string).  Depending on your XML "flavor", you should be able to uniquely-identify the Version information.
    I'm interested in how best to work with XML.  It seems cumbersome and prone to error to use string functions.  Is there a way or best practice of reading the XML fields directly without converting to cluster?
    XML is, after all, text with specific "tag" information, also text, identifying it.  String functions are pretty much "the way to go", but except in rare circumstances, you shouldn't necessarily "roll your own", but should try to use the utilities that come with your XML package that "know" how to do the mapping between the XML representation of a LabVIEW variable (and its value) and the Variable itself.
    Can you elaborate on these "mapping" and "reading/conversion" routines you're using?  How do they work and what functions do they use?
    An excellent question.  There are at least three XML packages out there for LabVIEW -- the "native" LabVIEW package that NI provides, EasyXML from JKI Software (distributed using VIPM), and GXML, also on the LabVIEW Package network.  I'm afraid that I'm slightly "abusing" XML, and have made some modifications to how I use EasyXML and GXML. 
    If you simply view an XML file in a "smart" editor, you'll see a series of text lines with Begin/End tags (like HTML).  Depending on the XML "flavor", embedded between the tags are data that describe the LabVIEW variable type (e.g. Dbl, Cluster, Array, etc.) and also the value(s) of the Variable.  The "ReadXML" (or similarly-named) function takes this description and (usually) returns a Variant that you can "turn into" the chosen variable (because you know the data type).  [You may need to tell the Reader, in advance, the type of LabVIEW variable to expect so that it "knows when to stop reading"].
    As to how they work, they just do String pattern matching and processing, usually of a pretty sophisticated level, but then you don't have to do the hard work yourself!
    Why do you use Private Project library?  Is your project based on OO?
    The reason I used a Project Library with the "messy details" in the Private parts has nothing to do with OO, but rather with "data hiding".  I actually developed this for my data processing routines.  I had a set of routines that collected and analyzed the data (about 700 VIs).  Let's call this Project "Version 1".
    For Version 2, I basically added a dozen variables to the main  Data Cluster (having over a hundred elements) that characterized the response.  As this Cluster was in a Type Def, I didn't have to change my code very much to accomodate this new data format, so most of my VIs kept the same name, but were "different" because the underlying TypeDefs were different.
    So I have a Version 1 program that can analyze Version 1 data, and a Version 2 program for Version 2 data.  What I want is a Version-independent program that can look at the data, and then call for Version 1 or Version 2 analysis.  By burying the Version 1 and Version 2 code inside of a Project Library, and only exposing the top-level "Analyze My Data" VI, my Analysis routine, which didn't know (and didn't care) about the two different Data TypeDefs, just figures out (from the XML) which Version of data I have and then calls either Lib1:Analyze My Data or Lib2:Analyze My Data.  If I ever change the Version again, I just need to copy the code in the Library to a new Lib3 Library, modify the TypeDef and related version-specific code as needed, and I'm done.
    I may have made this sound easy -- trust me, it was a definite learning experience.  While trying this out, the first thing I did was to "break" my installations of LabVIEW 2012, 2013, and 2014 (curiously, LabVIEW 2011 wasn't broken).  It stayed "broken" for about a week, then "cured" itself (I'd done something illegal, or maybe just immoral, with my Library, and it took a while to purge the badness).
    BS

  • I uninstalled FF4 because it's buggy. Some kind of dumb dialog box keeps opening, and there's much that isn't compatable with new version.

    I want to go back to firefox 3,6. I uninstalled FF 4 because it's buggy. I don't like it. There's a dialog box that keeps opening. That never happened before. It's damned annoying and not necessary.
    There are a number of items that no longer are compatible that once were.

    I want to go back to firefox 3,6. I uninstalled FF 4 because it's buggy. I don't like it. There's a dialog box that keeps opening. That never happened before. It's damned annoying and not necessary.
    There are a number of items that no longer are compatible that once were.

  • Can no longer copy and paste with new version. Articles you provided did not help.

    When I try to copy and paste in firefox it says I can't do it any longer. It's a security issue, and the "learn more" tab gives some abstruse directions about completely closing firefox, and then getting back in without opening it to a place I can't find.
    Could you please tell me how to re-enable these necessary functions in an understandable way?

    Is this only on one website? some websites disable copy and pasting for various reasons.
    If this happens on every website, have you tried to start Firefox up in [[Safe Mode|Safe Mode]]? It may be an extension causing the problem.
    Also, go ahead and update to Firefox 11, since it does have several bug fixes (I don't recall anything related to copy and paste, but give it a go [http://www.getfirefox.com www.getfirefox.com] )
    Or, you may have some sort of virus which is interfering with your copy and paste. Download and Install MalwareBytes Anti-Malware, run a full Scan. [http://www.malwarebytes.org/ http://www.malwarebytes.org/]
    Download and Run TDSSKiller [http://support.kaspersky.com/faq/?qid=208283363 http://support.kaspersky.com/faq/?qid=208283363]
    Let me know if you are still having problems after these steps!

  • Problems with Apple Preview filled forms and compatibility with Windows?

    Anyone else having problems with Apple Preview filled out forms and compatibility with Microsoft Windows after Lion?
    I've had it happen recently with two different people, where the data I had entered on a fillable PDF form could not be seen by Microsoft Windows, but I saw my data just fine.
    I don't know what version of Adobe Acrobat they were running.
    Thanks,
    kt

    You will get that first message when the document has been changed in a way that invalidates the internal digital signature that's applied when a document is Reader-enabled. Certain changes are allowed (e.g., filling fields, commenting, signing) and will not invalidate the signature, but others are not. The exact cause of the change is often hard to track down, but it can be due to font problems, some type of file corruption, or something that Acrobat/Reader attempts to correct when the file is opened/saved. You will also get the message if the users system time is not correct and is currently set to some time before the document was Reader-enabled. It seems best to use the most recent version of Acrobat to enabled the documents and recent versions of Reader to work with them.
    It problem is probably not related to the user using anything in the Sign pane.

  • Appleworks docs and compatibility with iWorks application?

    Appleworks docs and compatibility with iWorks application? Does it exists? I do not have iWorks and will soon be upgrading my op sys to 10.4 (it really is in the mail) I currentl have 10.2.8
    I use AppleWorks a great deal. Does iWorks replace it? or enhance it?
    Will AppleWorks be upgraded or is 6.2.9 the last iteration?

    Welcome to Apple Discussions SYGWS
    iWork (no "s") is not an application, but the name given to the package of two applications, Keynote & Pages.
    Keynote is a presentation application that can open AppleWorks 6 presentation files & PowerPoint files. I haven't use Keynote other than to view a few presentation. You probably can find a lot of information by searching the Keynote forum.
    Pages is the word processing/page layout application in iWork. Pages is able to open AppleWorks 6 word processing document as well as Word, text & RTF documents. It is not able to open any other AppleWorks documents or older Word documents (I'm not sure how far back it goes). Pages 1 (iWork '05) will not display floating spreadsheet frames in AppleWorks 6 word processing documents, Pages 2 can. Pages 2 has limited spreadsheet functions available in tables (as does Keynote 3, both in iWork '06). Pages can export as PDF, Word, plain text, RTF & HTML (HTML export is disappointing to say the least). It cannot export as AppleWorks (any version).
    No one here knows for sure if AppleWorks will ever get another update & those that do have signed non-disclosure agreements, but it is extremely unlikely. In the iWork ’05 press release iWork is said to be "building the successor to AppleWorks."
    Many users here, like me, use Pages for what it does so well & AppleWorks for what it does that iWork doesn't (at least not yet) - databases, spreadsheets & drawing.

  • Digital persona(fingerprint reader) extension is incompatable with firefox 4.0b7 and many more extension which is working in firefox 3.6 is not compatable with this version

    Current version of firefox shows "Digital persona(fingerprint reader) extension is incompatable with firefox 4.0b7" and many more extension which is working in firefox 3.6 also not compatable with this version what should we do because this extensions are very useful for me in my laptop

    I got this reply from DigitalPersona:
    "DigitalPersona made the decision late last Spring, to discontinue the Personal products. There will be no further revisions."

  • Xfdf and pdf works in Adobe Reader 6, but not with new versions 7, 8, X

    I have a xfdf file which is created by querying a SQL data base and contains data for a pdf form; it works with Adobe Reader 6, but does not work with new versions of Adobe Readers (7, 8, 9 and X).
    It is an intranet site running IIS 6.0 in Windows Server 2003 Web Edition SP2 with Adobe 6 installed and client systems include XPSP2, XPSP3, Vista, Windows 7 with different versions of IE, Firefox.
    With new versions of Adobe Reader, click on the hyperlink launched the pdf form in a browser window without data; below is the link:
            // create shipping slip hyperlink
            string strLtrSlipUrl = "~/Archive/LtrShipSlip.pdf#FDF=" + lblWO.Text + "LtrShipSlip" + ".xfdf";
            HyperLink hlLtrShipPdf = new HyperLink();
            hlLtrShipPdf.Text = "Ltr Shipping Slip";
            hlLtrShipPdf.NavigateUrl = strLtrSlipUrl;
            hlLtrShipPdf.Target = "_blank";
            pnlLtrShipSlip.Controls.Add(hlLtrShipPdf);
    I have installed new versions of Adobe Reader in the Web server (to match what the clients are using), but results are the same – blank pdf.
    I uninstalled the new versions and installed version 6 and the pdf and xfdf worked happily together, but we need new versions of Adobe Reader in the client computers.
    Thanks for helps and suggestions – I have read articles about using iTextSharp to create pdf documents from .NET apps, but that would be my last choice.

    Adobe Reader 9 can't save the old FDA forms. FDA must update their forms.

  • My APE11 gets an Unable to use plug-in It's not compatable with this version of Photoshop

    My APE 11 will read my Canon 70D raw file since I used the 8.3. In the organiser but as soon as I got to Edit the Raw file it just come up " Unable to use Camera Raw Plug-in" " It is not compatable with this version of Photoshop" No photo in the screen at all just a blank area with the raw sliders. And the box with the wording unable to use etc.

    PortalPacific wrote:
    …Here is the file im having trouble with. You can download it here if you are interested in taking a look:  …http://portalpacific.net/movieposter.psd
    I downloaded it and looked at it.  Even Graphic Converter can't recover any pixels or meaningful data, just some general information:
    In my experience, if GraphicConverter can't open it, nothing will.
    Your file is toast  Sorry.

  • Dreamweaver MX 2004 compatibility with latest versions?

    Dreamweaver MX 2004 compatibility with latest versions?
    I have templates in a old Dreamweaver MX 2004 and want to update my software. Will I need to go in steps to a version a few years back and then to current?  Or can I go all the way to current?
    I also can't get my old dreamweaver to register anymore and they have NO support for it.  Any clues?  It is legit an I have the registration numbers and all the same but it won't take it for some reason.
    thank you all for any support you can give.

    HTML is HTML.  The product you use doesn't matter much except in terms of "ease of use" and quality of code it generates.  MX is a dinosaur.  Depending on how you built your sites with it, you may need to update your code to modern web standards.  But your site's code will remain editable in any version of DW.
    That said, a LOT has changed in 10 years.  So if you don't have really strong coding skills in HTML and CSS, you will struggle with newer versions of DW.  The interface is different, too, so it will take some adjustment.
    CS6 is the only version you can still purchase.
    Creative Suite 6
    All the rest are available only through subscription to the Creative Cloud.
    Creative Cloud pricing and membership plans | Adobe Creative Cloud
    Nancy O.

  • Primavera P6 R 8.2 compatibility with OID version 10.1.2.0.2

    Hi,
    Below mentioned is current OID version and Primavera version available:
    OID: 10.1.2.0.2
    Primavera: P6 R 8.2
    As per Oracle Support Team, P6 R8.2 has not been tested with OID version mentioned above however it has been tested with 10.1.4.0.1
    Can you please confirm about Primavera version compatibility with OID version 10.1.2.0.2 ?
    Thanks
    Andy

    Hi,
    Can anybody please respond to this ?
    Thanks in advance ...

  • TS5376 I'm having a problem with downloading and installing the new version of itunes for windows (11.1.4)  I have done everything the troubleshooting article has said and it is still not working properly.

    'm having a problem with downloading and installing the new version of itunes for windows (11.1.4)  I have done everything the troubleshooting article has said and it is still not working properly.  I have even done a repair to see if that works and it has not.  Has anyone else found a new way to get it working?

    Try Troubleshooting issues with iTunes for Windows updates.
    tt2

  • Have iTunes version 10 .3 but do not understand cloud in iTunes 11.03 can someone explain it and also how do you find duplicates in new version and will the new version sync with my iPod Classic which I have had for 4 years

    I have iTunes version 10.03 which I love but my iPad Apple mini has iOS 7 but I don't understand the new iTunes what is the cloud shown next to the music and how can I find duplicates can anyone help me navigate the new iTunes and will the new version sync with my iPod Classic which is 4 years old

    The main differences between iTunes 11 and earlier versions are the loss of coverflow and ability to have multiple windows open.
    In Windows, you can restore much of the look & feel of iTunes 10.7 with these shortcuts:
    ALT to temporarily display the menu bar
    CTRL+B to show or hide the menu bar
    CTRL+S to show or hide the sidebar
    CTRL+/ to show or hide the status bar (won't hide for me on Win XP)
    Click the magnifying glass top right and untick Search Entire Library to restore the old search behaviour
    Use View > Hide <Media Kind> in the cloud or Edit > Preferences > Store and untick Show iTunes in the cloud purchases to hide the cloud items. The second method eliminates the cloud status column (and may let iTunes start up more quickly)
    If you don't like having different coloured background & text in the Album (Grid) view use Edit > Preferences > General and untick Use custom colours for open albums, movies, etc.
    With iTunes 11.0.3 and later you can enable artwork in the Songs view from View > Show View Options (CTRL+J) making it more like the old Album List view
    View > Show View Options (CTRL+J) also contains options to change the sorting of grid based views
    The cloud icons give you access to stream or download any qualifying past purchases that you don't currently have downloaded to the library.
    Regarding duplicates, things haven't really changed. Apple's official advice is here... HT2905 - How to find and remove duplicate items in your iTunes library. It is a manual process and the article fails to explain some of the potential pitfalls.
    Use Shift > View > Show Exact Duplicate Items to display duplicates as this is normally a more useful selection. You need to manually select all but one of each group to remove. Sorting the list by Date Added may make it easier to select the appropriate tracks, however this works best when performed immediately after the dupes have been created.  If you have multiple entries in iTunes connected to the same file on the hard drive then don't send to the recycle bin. Use my DeDuper script if you're not sure, don't want to do it by hand, or want to preserve ratings, play counts and playlist membership. See this thread for background and please take note of the warning to backup your library before deduping.
    (If you don't see the menu bar press ALT to show it temporarily or CTRL+B to keep it displayed)
    Yes, iTunes 11 will support your iPod classic.
    tt2

  • After Upgrading to 10.6.8 my aperture app starts but hangs trying to read the Lib. I removed the old lib and start with new. but still have the problem. 10.6.8 also made my Shark FX7 do the same thing. Any Ideas? Thanks

    After Upgrading to 10.6.8 my aperture app starts but hangs trying to read the Lib. I removed the old lib and start with new. but still have the problem. 10.6.8 also made my Shark FX7 do the same thing. Any Ideas? Thanks

    Verifying volume “Macintosh HD”
    Performing live verification.
    Checking Journaled HFS Plus volume.
    Checking extents overflow file.
    Checking catalog file.
    Checking multi-linked files.
    Checking catalog hierarchy.
    Checking extended attributes file.
    Checking volume bitmap.
    Checking volume information.
    The volume Macintosh HD appears to be OK.

Maybe you are looking for