INdesign CS5 and Lion Screen redraw errors

I have been running INdesign 7.0.4 with Mac OS 10.7.2, I am getting screen redraw issues and ghosting when scrolling or making any edits. I have trashed the prefs, repaired my disk permissions to no avail.
Anyone else having this issue?
Thanks for your help!

Ah, this is easy.
You have a problem with the SING module, see http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/408/kb408816.html.
2619 ???  (in Document Actions)  load address 0x12061000 + 0x2e08  [0x12063e08]
2619 GetPlugIn  (in AppFramework) + 57129  [0x1103f769]
2619 GetPlugIn  (in AppFramework) + 54943  [0x1103eedf]
2619 GetPlugIn  (in Font Manager) + 205284  [0x12b17074]
2619 GetPlugIn  (in Font Manager) + 54889  [0x12af24f9]
2619 GetPlugIn  (in Font Manager) + 53411  [0x12af1f33]
2619 GetPlugIn  (in Font Manager) + 54444  [0x12af233c]
2619 GetPlugIn  (in Font Manager) + 53832  [0x12af20d8]
2619 GetPlugIn  (in Font Manager) + 46910  [0x12af05ce]
2619 GetPlugIn  (in Font Manager) + 160199  [0x12b0c057]
2619 GetPlugIn  (in Font Manager) + 124761  [0x12b035e9]
2619 GetPlugIn  (in Font Manager) + 430364  [0x12b4dfac]
2619 ???  (in Font Manager)  load address 0x12abd000 + 0x2000a  [0x12add00a]
2619 GetPlugIn  (in AppFramework) + 57129  [0x1103f769]
2619 GetPlugIn  (in AppFramework) + 54943  [0x1103eedf]
2619 GetPlugIn  (in SING) + 21595  [0x106e933b]
2619 GetPlugIn  (in SING) + 20802  [0x106e9022]
2619 GetPlugIn  (in SING) + 52092  [0x106f0a5c]
2619 SINGDLLStorage_GetGlyphlet  (in SING) + 94  [0x1801977a]
2619 SINGDLLStorage_GetGlyphlet  (in SINGCore) + 127  [0x180a527b]
2619 SINGStorage_GetGlyphletWorker(_t_SINGCtx*, char const*, unsigned long, unsigned char**, unsigned long*)  (in SINGCore) + 87  [0x180a4eb9]
2619 GetDocument(_t_SINGCtx*, unsigned long)  (in SINGCore) + 280  [0x1809a820]
2619 SINGLIB::ContextImpl::GetRootDocument() const  (in SINGCore) + 269  [0x1805d92b]
2619 SINGLIB::CatalogOperationContext::CatalogOperationContext(boost::shared_ptr<SINGLIB::Context>)  (in SINGCore) + 155  [0x180820cd]
2619 SINGLIB::SystemLock::Acquire()  (in SINGCore) + 32  [0x18082b12]
2619 __sem_wait_nocancel  (in libsystem_kernel.dylib) + 10  [0x9c62bb7a]

Similar Messages

  • Indesign CS5 and CS5.5 crash on new document / Lion 10.7

    Hello!
    In our agency we encountered a problem since upgrading to OS X Lion 10.7. Both our Indesign CS5 and CS5.5 keep crashing on us whetver we open an existing document or create a new one. We tried to clean-up our installations, deleted both, installed just CS5 and/ CS5.5 - trashed preferences etc. pp. Nothing worked.
    Indesign opens like it should - but the moment we create a document it just hangs with the spinning ball - does anyone else can recreate the issue? We use no plugins in indesign only the app "Fontcase" from the Appstore to maintain our collection of fonts.. but we even tried to deactivate this app to see if it helps - no success.
    We currently cant set up the system new since it is time consuming and just our last choice.. is there some other way to find the problem? We also never see the adobe crash-reporter.. not even after 10-15 minutes as stated in the lion os x issue list.
    Thanks!

    Ah, this is easy.
    You have a problem with the SING module, see http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/408/kb408816.html.
    2619 ???  (in Document Actions)  load address 0x12061000 + 0x2e08  [0x12063e08]
    2619 GetPlugIn  (in AppFramework) + 57129  [0x1103f769]
    2619 GetPlugIn  (in AppFramework) + 54943  [0x1103eedf]
    2619 GetPlugIn  (in Font Manager) + 205284  [0x12b17074]
    2619 GetPlugIn  (in Font Manager) + 54889  [0x12af24f9]
    2619 GetPlugIn  (in Font Manager) + 53411  [0x12af1f33]
    2619 GetPlugIn  (in Font Manager) + 54444  [0x12af233c]
    2619 GetPlugIn  (in Font Manager) + 53832  [0x12af20d8]
    2619 GetPlugIn  (in Font Manager) + 46910  [0x12af05ce]
    2619 GetPlugIn  (in Font Manager) + 160199  [0x12b0c057]
    2619 GetPlugIn  (in Font Manager) + 124761  [0x12b035e9]
    2619 GetPlugIn  (in Font Manager) + 430364  [0x12b4dfac]
    2619 ???  (in Font Manager)  load address 0x12abd000 + 0x2000a  [0x12add00a]
    2619 GetPlugIn  (in AppFramework) + 57129  [0x1103f769]
    2619 GetPlugIn  (in AppFramework) + 54943  [0x1103eedf]
    2619 GetPlugIn  (in SING) + 21595  [0x106e933b]
    2619 GetPlugIn  (in SING) + 20802  [0x106e9022]
    2619 GetPlugIn  (in SING) + 52092  [0x106f0a5c]
    2619 SINGDLLStorage_GetGlyphlet  (in SING) + 94  [0x1801977a]
    2619 SINGDLLStorage_GetGlyphlet  (in SINGCore) + 127  [0x180a527b]
    2619 SINGStorage_GetGlyphletWorker(_t_SINGCtx*, char const*, unsigned long, unsigned char**, unsigned long*)  (in SINGCore) + 87  [0x180a4eb9]
    2619 GetDocument(_t_SINGCtx*, unsigned long)  (in SINGCore) + 280  [0x1809a820]
    2619 SINGLIB::ContextImpl::GetRootDocument() const  (in SINGCore) + 269  [0x1805d92b]
    2619 SINGLIB::CatalogOperationContext::CatalogOperationContext(boost::shared_ptr<SINGLIB::Context>)  (in SINGCore) + 155  [0x180820cd]
    2619 SINGLIB::SystemLock::Acquire()  (in SINGCore) + 32  [0x18082b12]
    2619 __sem_wait_nocancel  (in libsystem_kernel.dylib) + 10  [0x9c62bb7a]

  • Line thickness problem in indesign CS5 and CS6

    I use indesign CS5 and many short lines of 0.5 point in my project.
    After export to pdf (press) everything seems correct. After rip process from printer office in compressed file lines seems to have different thickness even on large zoom (400%).
    High quality pdf from rip prepared by printer office still shows small differences in thickness. Lines are in one solid color in my project.
    What is the source of this problem? 0.5 point ines seems not extremely thin.
    If the line is not sharp in pdf will it be not sharp in press?

    I wouldn't go off what I see on screen. I'd be asking the printer for a hi-res proof. If that's not satisfactory they could run a test on offcuts on another print job to see where the problem lies.
    One reason for different linethickness could be that the lines are interacting with transparent areas, giving the appearance of thicker, or could be physically changing the width by a few decimals.
    I'd try putting any of the thin lines on their own layer - and perhaps try different PDF compatibilities, from PDF 1.3 to PDF 1.4 etc.

  • Large PDFs from Indesign CS5 under Lion

    Has anyone noctived the incredibly large PDFs exported from Indesign CS5 under OS X 10.7 Lion?...
    When OS X 10. Snow Leopard all was great, though now I have noticed HUGE differences!!??
    crazy. example Indesign exported to pdf 106mb
    Print to file, then Distiller: 32mb
    BIG DIFFERENCE
    anyone else?
    thanks

    Ok lets forget the Distiller part of this story, sorry.
    My issue is that under Lion PDF's are WAY larger than in previous OS X (Snow Leopard etc)
    I don't have any Mac on Snow Leopard to now show a comparison only previous PDF's made before Lion was installed and they are signifcantly smaller.
    I just tested I think it is new documents made in Indesign CS5 in Lion.
    Testing a indd file previously made in Snow Leopard I exported a PDF it produced the same size PDF as in Snow Leopard, so now I am confused slightly hoping I am wrong. Then I exported that same .indd as a .idml opened and saved as .indd then exported as a PDF it is 150kb larger... small difference yes, though  ot enough to worry about, so I tried with previous larger files... only to have them create the satisfactory sized pdf.
    Ok, I am wondering if newly created documents are the issue?...
    Moving on I found then I found this..  http://www.creativepro.com/article/drop-20-pounds-indesign
    I have just done a space audit most of the file is the images, my only conclusion is that the images are containing meta data that is hogging?...

  • InDesign CS5 and InCopy CS3

    I work at a weekly newspaper, and we have been using and InDesign/InCopy workflow for several years. The Reporters use InDesign CS2 (never did get around to installing the CS3 upgrades we bought because at first the computers they use wouldn't handle it, and after the computer upgrades got done all around, no one ever bothered). After the stories are written, the editor reviews them in InCopy, then releases them to the page designers who are now working in InDesign CS3 as part of Standard and Premium Suites.
    We are considering upgrading to InDesign CS5, but absolutely NONE of the reporters or the editor needs (or will ever use) the listed improvements included in InCopy CS5. Since there are nine InCopy products in the office, and as everyone knows the economy sucks - especially for PRINTED NEWSPAPERS these days, we really hate to have to upgrade just for upgrades sake.
    I have downloaded InDesign CS5 trial to check if our CS3 files will open and work in it, after reading an article published in the Washington Newspaper, a publication put out by the Washington Newspaper Publishers Association, reported that one of the state's newspapers happily upgraded to CS5 and had a nightmare of problems just opening their CS4 files. This has my editor very nervious about us upgrading. So... I'm testing it out, and I can't place, then open and edit our CS3 Incopy Files. I get a message that says "this story needs toa be converted to "InCopy Document" format to edit it. I've saved it in InCopy CS3 to both incx and incd formats, and both receive the error. Has Adobe made simple InCopy files incompatible with InDesign? I can import files from just about everywhere BUT InCopy??? The Sister Program?
    Please advise a simple work around, or I'll bet our upgrade is totally put off.
    Daria Lacy
    The Reflector

    Bob,
    I have to feel that you aren't really reading my posts. While I did mention that our reporters and editor lessentially use InCopy for a word processing program, I did specifically mention in my last post that we use the program for exactly what it was originally intended, for reporters to write and edit, for designers to layout the text, and for writers/and or correction people to get into the files and fix problems - up until the last minute, so yes, we do need to use InCopy, in the manner we were told it was developed for. We don't use it for viewing layouts - that's what InDesign is for.
    PLUS, none of our reporters have time, inclination or need to view the layout as it appears in InDesign. If they did, we'd get InDesign for them. They are busy investigating and writing stories, they don't have time to learn even the basics of layout, and frankly, they don't even want to. The one single reporter that is interested has learned some of the basics of InDesign, but she doesn't use it on a regular basis, and dosn't need or want to view the pages. She does need and want to edit a story occasionally even after it's been placed into the layout, but she want's to view it as the same copy she wrote, so she can do it quickly, not as a page layout she has to hunt thru it and every other story on the page to find the problem.
    I don't mind Adobe stopping selling older versions - don't blame them at all on that one - if you're buying a new product - go buy the latest and greatest. If the version didn't matter, you wouldn't have to worry if about matching your other versions and you wouldn't need to find an old version. But why BUILD IN obselecense in a PART of a system within just a couple of years. We're using CS3 InDesign, yes, but we bought it just shortly before they came out with CS4. If we'd known when the release would be (we don't track the industry close enough to be checking on when release dates are "expected" to be) we'd have probably waited the 4 months and upgraded to that. But time wise, we haven't had the CS3 THAT long, so I don't go along with the "two versions back is too old" theory.
    I'm afraid I don't quite see why the text fit would change from one version to another when the fit is based on font, text size, etc. And that doesn't change, Times Roman, 10.5 point on 10.7 leading...  And as far as split/span/balanced column features and mutiple page sizes - those aren't going to affect our work flow at all. All we need is the ability to write text, and edit that text from other desks besides the designers, as well as the designers being able to open the file to fix headline size in InDesign.
    As for the reporters getting the trial version and trying it out - did you miss where I mentioned that we provided CS3 to all of them, and pretty much none of them bothered to load it onto their computers??? They don't want any bells and whistles. They want to keep going as they are going.
    If they wanted to go to the latest and greatest - it'd wouldnt' be an issue - but they don't need or want it, why should they be forced to upgrade just for the sake of upgrading?
    And that also brings up the issue, when we buy those 7 versions that aren't going on computers with InDesign (and the whole rest of the Standard and Design Suites) who wants to bet me that it's gonna take more hard drive space, more ram, and there's a huge potential that it ain't even going to fit on their computers and still leave room for it to think?
    And just one other though - just because backwards incompatibility is a fact of life in today's programs - does that make it good or right?
    What this basically means, with no specific NEED for the designers to upgrade to InDesign CS5, and the requirement that if they do we'll have to upgrade not only the reporter's versions of InCopy AND most probably, their computers, we will probably put off upgrading and wait another year and a half for CS6.
    Daria

  • Create unlimited folios today with InDesign CS5 and 5.5!

    Adobe's official statement
    http://blogs.adobe.com/digitalpublishing/2011/10/create-unlimited-folios-today-with-indesi gn-cs5-5.html
    Did you know…
    Customers with InDesign CS5 and CS5.5 can now create an unlimited number of .folio files for no additional charge.
    You already know that InDesign CS5 and CS5.5 integrate with Adobe Digital Publishing Suite to allow customers to publish apps to tablet devices such as the iPad, Xoom and PlayBook. But for InDesign CS5 and CS5.5 customers who are interested in creating content for tablet devices but are not yet customers, it is now easier than ever to try digital publishing before making the financial investment in the Digital Publishing Suite solution that meets your needs.
    InDesign CS5 and CS5.5 customers can now:
    Create an unlimited number of .folio files in InDesign
    Preview them on Adobe Content Viewer  – including interactivity – to see how they will render when published to a tablet device
    Share them with colleagues or clients on a 1:1 basis via the Adobe Content Viewer
    Further, customers can now access the Folio Producer Service in the Digital Publishing Suite with a valid Adobe ID to manage and edit their .folio files. All of this can be done before purchasing Digital Publishing Suite.
    If you are interested in learning how to create an App directly from InDesign CS5 or CS5.5, without writing code or depending on a developer, feel free to try it. You can pitch ideas to your client or your boss; or you can build a portfolio of your work and preview it on a tablet device. Practice makes perfect, and with an unlimited number of .folios, you can practice as much as you want! When you’re ready to publish to an app store, you can select the Digital Publishing Suite solution that is right for you.

    I'm sorry EvBurk, what you want is intended not to work.
    All Adobe's promotional material concerning InDesign and Digital Publishing (including the above "official statement") carefully uses verbs like "create" or "produce". But they never mention "distribute" or "spread", without explicitly referring to their exclusive hosting services. The whole Folio thing (in contrast to the former "issue" format) revolves around not giving you any chance of physically exporting, managing or owing the folio file itself. It's always somewhere on Adobe's or Apple's servers, or on your iPad, which is also as shut as a vault. So there's no way to export a folio file and toss it around like a pdf or jpeg. All you can do (without a paid distribution) is "share" your folio with some others, under the idea of "testing" and "reviewing". But this can be a cumbersome method. And even when paid (for the app), it's still difficult to distribute it outside Apple's or Android's market.
    More than a year ago (in the middle of the Flash-on-iOS debate) Adobe users, developers, bloggers, and evangelists heavily criticized Apple's "walled garden". Adobe literally stated "We Love Apple - What we don't love is anybody taking away your freedom to choose what you create, how you create it, and what you experience on the web." Well, you could say now: "I love Adobe, but what I don't love is Adobe taking away my freedom to own my files, and distribute them on my own terms." They let us create, but not spread our ideas. It's like giving you a typewriter and copier, that only works with Adobe stock paper. Like giving you a voice and an instrument, but only allowing you to sing and play in some walled gardens (dress code: Apple ID) or secluded shed (invitation only).
    I really wonder why they so fiercely protect 'their' Folio file. Why do they either have to be "under protection" or be turned into apps? I understand why Apple wants and needs to curate apps, but they don't mind me spreading my own ePubs, mp3 or jpegs. Why doesn't Adobe let me put my folio's on my own server, or send them off to someone with my own preferred service? The Content Viewer could easily be an Acrobat-like reader and let the iPad open folio's (by web links or mail enclosures) into it. If I see how many questions, worries, and problems creators and users have due to this whole closed technique and business, it would be easier to just let go and see what happens. Is it money? Of course it is. But my guess is that Adobe would eventually benefit more from it.
    So I hope Adobe declares the Folio as an "open" standard soon, but they're definitely not in that stage. Maybe the specification of the file format just isn't ready yet. Maybe some managers need to remember again how to "Spread the Love"...

  • Pixelated glitches and slow screen redraw

    Mid 2010 27" iMac (iMac11,3) with Radeon 5750 (1GB) running Mavericks 10.9.1. AppleCare just expired in December 2013 (of course!). Graphics card has been replaced in 2012 via AppleCare. Entire LCD panel has been replaced Jan 2013 via AppleCare. And now another graphics-related problem is back.
    The display goes black after logging in to an account after a couple minutes. And there's no way to bring it back other than a forced power off and reboot.
    I boot into Safe Mode and the screen redraw is extremely slow and there are these repeating glitchy blocks (see attached images).
    Any ideas? Do thse glitches look familiar to anyone? I created a new admin account and the problem exists there too, so I'm pretty sure it's not a bad user pref.

    Thanks for your reply.
    I am using Logic 9.1.1. on Snow Leopard. Upon installing Logic 9 recently, I noticed that the seemless screen redraws ( from extreme close up to extreme zoom out) takes over five separate attempts. it's like there's only so much video power to do it one shot like I used to.
    To be clear, let's say I'm very zoomed into a region editing an vocal comp track. Then I want to zoom out to see the whole project from start to finish. I click the playhead in the global tracks area. Then I push up and it shrinks the project to fit the screen. The problem is that it only goes so far before I have to release the mouse where it is and then try another run at it.
    Here's a self-answer:
    My feeling is that Logic has made it a more exacting science of how to manipulate the zoom in and out with the playhead. I actually feel it's faster now, you just have to stay within certain limits and not take your mouse and go too far up into the shorcuts area like I was used to in Logic 8. You have to stay within the global tracks area and your horizontal movements will be very fast actually and very smooth.
    Happy music making

  • Indesign cs5 and photoshop cs5 preferences installed as one.

    I have Indesign cs5 and adobe photoshop cs5 extended installed in my copmputer. I see those two programs as the largest installed applications in my computer. I just wonder that maybe some of the preferences of Indesign cs5 and photoshop cs5 are the same. I am thinking that these files are the reason why the two applications are very large.
    For example the Adobe Bridge cs5, i think that Adobe Bridge is installed two times in my computer. One from the installation of Indesign and one is from the Photoshop.
    I just want to know if there is a way to install the two applications having their preferences installed once and both applications could use them. I think in that way i can save a free space in my hard drive. Any help would be much appreciated.

    You cannot save space on your hard drive by combining portions of these programs, no.
    Their "preferences" take up a very small fraction of the space used by these programs.
    Furthermore, they already have an extensive set of common (shared) files that are used by both programs that are installed outside the program directories for each program.
    Under Windows, that is C:\Program Files\Common Files\Adobe. For Mac, /Library/Application Support/Adobe.
    But no.
    Also, hard drives are incredibly cheap. If you're worried about the size of these programs, you are doing something wrong and you're not going to be able to use them efficiently anyhow. In particular, effective use of photoshop needs many more times the size of the program in free space.
    It's probably time to go and out buy several hundred GB (or some TB) of space.

  • Indesign CS5 and CS6 crashing

    OSX 10.7.5
    Working in Indesign CS5 and CS6 on the same computer. Opening multiple different documents, it will crash either while browsing the file, closing, or saving at random intervals.
    Indesign CS5 crash:
    http://pastebin.com/mWyFgWVv
    Crashed Thread:  0  Main Thread  Dispatch queue: com.apple.main-thread
    Exception Type:  EXC_BAD_ACCESS (SIGBUS)
    Exception Codes: KERN_PROTECTION_FAILURE at 0x0000000000000001
    Indesign CS6 crash:
    http://pastebin.com/B3jJM7cr
    Crashed Thread:  0  Main Thread  Dispatch queue: com.apple.main-thread
    Exception Type:  EXC_BAD_ACCESS (SIGSEGV)
    Exception Codes: KERN_INVALID_ADDRESS at 0x00000000ffffffff
    Using Universal Type Server 3 client for fonts. I tried doing a synchronize and reset, and reactivating all of the fonts, but this did not help.

    Is Universal Type Server updated to the latest version? Is InDesign the only program you're facing issues with? Are you working with the document that is located in a network location? Try saving the file locally to your computer and see if you can replicate the crash. Clean the InDesign cache location by dragging the en_US folder from the following location: Macintosh HD/Users/Username/Library/Caches/Adobe InDesign/version 7.0 or version 8.0/ for both CS5 and CS6. If you can't see the Library, then use the Go menu of the Finder holding down the Alt key on the keyboard to make the Library visible inside the Go menu and navigate to it that way.
    Once you've cleaned the cache, re-launch InDesign and open your document to edit. Do not activate all fonts using the UTS, just activate the fonts that you used in your document to test for crash. If ID still crashes, then replace fonts by local fonts and test for crash.
    Change the Display performance settings from Preferences to Fast for both Options panel and Adjust view settings panel and test for crash.

  • Are InDesign CS5 and InCopy CC compatible?

    Does a workflow between InDesign CS5 and InCopy CC work?Or does InCopy CC only work with InDesign CS6 or CC?
    I’d be really grateful for your advice - thanks!
    Kathrin

    I was looking for answers to a problem and I found this post. Question. Can InCopy CS5 and CC live togheter on the same computer? I'm creating inDesign files using CS5 that I want to use with inCopy.
    I cannot open any thing using InCopy CS5 but it all open in CC, Can save and re-open in InDesign CS5...
    But I'm the only one in my team using CC. Anyway, any tips would be gratefully appreciated.

  • Screen redraw errors in Jdev 10.1.3.1 and 10.1.3.2

    My laptop is having serious troubles drawing the screen correctly in Jdeveloper 10.1.3.1 and 10.1.3.2. This problem only occurs when I use the mouse..The best way to describe how the screen looks is that the item that is scrolled "out" of the visible screen leaves a few display lines in place.
    When I create a screenshot ( ALT-PRINT SCREEN button combo ) it captures the screen corruption as well.
    I've tried various display drivers but this didn't solve the issue ( yet ).
    My laptop specs.
    HP/COMPAQ NC6320
    4gb memory ( 2x2gb).
    Windows XP Pro
    Anyone else has the same display redraw errors and/or someone knows a solution to this problem?

    Try:
    1) Making sure you have the latest video drivers from your laptop vendor.
    2) Dropping graphics acceleration somewhat. I think you can do this from the Advanced page on the Display control panel in Windows (unfortunately, I currently don't have access to a Windows machine, so I can't point you to exactly the right place).
    3) This option instead: -J-Dsun.java2d.noddraw=true
    4) Making sure you have the latest JDK minor update.
    Java is notorious for having visual issues on laptop graphics hardware, unfortunately.
    Thanks,
    Brian

  • Indesign cs5.5 server (service) giving error while including .indd document

    Hi all,
    When I try to include the .indd document in book  and try to genarate pdf using indesign cs5.5  server sevice  it gives following error:
    ( note : but when i am using command line(.bat ) file it is including .indd document without locking)
    Error::    
    "[server] C:\clients\221\template\JNH.indd is locked and cannot be added to book file! [7232] [18387]"
    please help me on this issue.
    Thanks,
    Sameer.

    Hi,
    I am not sure if this is a "Master Page since we use a French version (the functionnality is  named "Gabarit" in French), so here is a printscreen which shows what our users try to do:
    Immediately after the drop is completed, InDesign shuts down without further notice as described before.
    I fully patched one machine to 7.5.3, rebooted it and it still does not work.
    I know 2 GB is a little bit short, but since this is currently a corporate standard in my customer's organization, I will need to be sure that this is the direct and only cause before any upgrade request can be made.
    Thank you for your help.

  • Indesign cs5.5 out of memory error

    Hi,
    I am having constant problems with out of memory errors in indesign cs5.5 (version 7.5.3).  I am on a mac. Everything is up to date, I have preflight off, my display performance is on typical view and have tried restarted my computer multiple times.  I do not have any other programs open and the document I have open is 3 pages (8.5x11) with little content and a couple links to small images.  I do not know what to do!  This is affecting my job and my performance!! Please help!!!  Thank you!

    close the application
    Rename the preferences from the following location
    /Users/[User Name]/Library/Preferences/Adobe InDesign/Version #
    /Users/[User Name]/Library/Caches/Adobe InDesign/Version [#]
    then open a new document and then open the document you are facing an issue with it should clear the memory issue temporally
    Alternate :
    copy and paste the content in a new document and check if the 1st option does not work
    PS : changing the folder name would reset the preferences
    refer to KB : InDesign preferences and support file locations

  • InDesign CS5 and inCopy CS6 workflow problem

    I've looked at other discussions and haven't found any to answer the question to our problem.
    We are a small publishing company and we have license for roughly 7 inDesign CS5 copies that we purchased a year ago.  We contract with outside editors to edit content for us using inCopy.  For a year there hasn't been any problems.  But any new contracted editor we now sign, which in turn purchases inCopy, we are having trouble with our files talking to one another.  Any new contracted editors are only able to purchase CS6 inCopy.  This leaves us with the problem of having inDesign CS5 on about 7 or so of our employees machines and 6-8 CS 5.5 InCopy on outside contracted editors and an additional 3-4 contracted editors with CS6 inCopy.  When the editors with CS6 inCopy try to open files from our InDesign CS5, either they won’t open at all, or they will open, the editor works on the project for awhile, their program crashes and they are not able to recover (re-open) the files again.  Which results in hours of lost work.
    Has anyone else come across this problem?  Is there a work around or a quick fix.  We would hate to have to upgrade to CS6 for all of our in house copies of InDesign and then ask our outside editors what do have inCopy cs5.5 to upgrade to CS6. 
    If this is the case, when CS7 comes out, and we hire additional outside editors, will we continuously have to go through the process of upgrades again?  This is too costly for use and our existing contracted editors.
    Any thoughts are assistance would be appreciated.
    This is one of the error messages received from an outside contracted editor using inCopy CS6.  The file crashed after several hours of work, when the editor went to reopen the file, they received this error.  Which looks to be a generic error code that doesn't tell us anything.

    Hi Ruffus,
    Unfortunately different versions of InDesign and InCopy do not work well with each other. Newer versions of the program should be able to open older files, but they cannot save backwards. I am not sure what is causing the errors with the newer versions of InCopy however.
    Are you able to open the CS6 InCopy files on your computers?   

  • Indesign CS5 and CS2 upgrade/compatibility issues

    Hi,
    I have recently upgraded from CS2 to CS5 and I am having printing issues.
    If I open a CS2 file in CS5, I can not print direct from Indesign.  It prints part of the page with big white boxes and then spits out 5 odd pages of error messages.
    I had a case open with Technical Support (#181804690) but they have now told me that CS2 and CS5 are not compatible and I will have to redesign all files from scratch.  He said that all CS2 files will not work in CS5 - only from CS3 and up.
    Surely this is can't be right and Adobe do not care (as I was told by Tech Support)?!
    Also, Indesign seems to crash every time I close the application.
    Can anyone help with this?  Thanks!

    Hi Peter,
    What a relief!!!
    My case number was 181804690.
    I have a Dell Optiplex 780 Intel Core Duo, Windows XP 32 bit.
    I am trying to print direct from Indesign to a Lexmark C782.  We have updated all the drivers etc from Lexmark but still not luck.
    When I print I get part of the background print fine but where there is meant to be text and images, there is just white boxes.
    The error messages which print out after the first page are:
    ERROR: syntaxerror
    OFFENDING COMMAND: binary token, type=138
    STACK:
    - mark -
    - dictionary -
    ERROR: syntaxerror
    OFFENDING COMMAND: binary token, type=138
    STACK:
    -0.0
    0.0
    ERROR: unmatchedmark
    OFFENDING COMMAND: ]
    STACK:
    0.0
    0.0
    ERROR: undefined
    OFFENDING COMMAND: i can't find it on the keyboard but its a little squiggle up the top.  Kind of like a 'v'
    STACK:
    Thanks so much for your help Peter!
    Kind regards,
    Jill

Maybe you are looking for