Indesign DPS Preview Quality

When I view my article in preview mode on an iPad via Overlay Creator the quality is much better than when I share it for download - new to all this - any help very much appreciated.

Hi Bob,
I am away from the studio until the morning (UK) but can provide a little more detail - I have tried all three formats and get the same result - have tried all jpeg settings as well as the automatic option. Images are a little coarse but the text is particularly noticeable - the preview that is created and viewed on a linked iPad is much higher quality.
I have tested on iPad 2 and retina - iPad 2 quality is just about acceptable but retina is not.
I will take some iPad screenshots of the preview mode quality and the shared version when I get in tomorrow morning (UK) - hopefully they will provide a visible difference.
If necessary I can share the poor quality version with you.
I am new to all of this so I am hoping that it is something simple that I am missing - if I have an epiphany during the course of the day I will let you know.
Regards

Similar Messages

  • NEED: InDesign/DPS expert for Funny Or Die's iPad & iPhone magazine The Occasional

    Hello!
    We are looking for a InDesign expert for Funny Or Die's iPhone and iPad comedy magazine, The Occasional.
    Lets get to the facts:
    >>>>>> ABOUT OUR OUR TEAM:
    A very small team that works fast on new ideas.
    Passionate about putting out a great product.
    Located in New York's Flatiron district.
    >>>>>> WHAT WE WANT IN YOU:
    > INDESIGN/DPS EXPERT: "I kinda have used InDesign before once in school?" Nope, I am talking you know the ins and out of InDesign DPS BIG TIME. You know all the interactive features and how to use them correctly. You know the DPS bugs already and the work arounds to get the job done. You can layout text and import pre-optimized image for the smallest folio size possible.
    > PHOTOSHOP PRO: I can give you a PSD layout and you can go into the file, and cut it up and translate it to InDesign for a flawless victory.
    > CODE CHAMPION: We animate the magazine using javascript and HTML 5. You will need to be able to take the assets and make them move awesomely. (We use Hype)
    > GREAT ATTITUDE: A yes attitude is a must. You will receive challenges, some without an obvious answer. But a yes attitude knows to research and figure out a way to get it done.
    > HARD WORKER: So, you know-- magazines mean deadlines. And sometimes deadlines suck. But we will need a person to be there sometimes all hours of the night to get projects done.
    > DETAIL ORIENTATED: You notice the little design flare and animated around it. You can be given a list of notes and nail everyone without us needing to go back and double check everything. You notice the 1 pixel off on the layout and want it fixed. You notice how many misspellings I have in this ad, probably.
    > VERY ORGANIZED: Lists on lists on lists. You make your own todo lists. The inside of your files are clean and labeled perfectly so a stranger could pop in and understand everything completely.
    > COMMUNICATION: You have a question? Ask us! You have a suggestion? Suggest it to us! We need someone who is ready to talk it out so it can be done right the first time.
    > STOKED TO BE HERE: This job is awesome. We want you to be stoked to be here. We are.
    >>>>>> PERKS:
    > RESPECT: You prove you can get the job done and we let you do it.
    > BEST TOOLS: You want new software to help out? Sure. Top of line laptop? No problem. Want something else crazy? LETS GET CRAZY.
    > COMPANY CULTURE: We ain't no chumps. We try our best to have a good time and leave the watercooler talk & office politics out of it.
    > DIET COKE: We have tons of it.
    > EVENTS: Neat events from time to time. Company outings from time to time. Stuff of that nature.
    > THE EXTRA GOODIES: Medical, dental, life, vision insurance, 401k, blah blah blah.
    >>>>>> INFORMATIVE SENTENCE ABOUT THE COMPANY:
    Funny or Die is a comedy brand for the 21st century. We produce hilarious, premium-quality, celebrity-based content for the web, TV, film, mobile, live events, and more. Our website, founded in April of 2007, is the #1 comedy destination online.
    >>>>>> HOW TO APPLY:
    Send me over some examples of InDesign development and if possible HTML animation. Make sure to tell me about the projects and how you worked on them. Also include a little something about yourself and why you think you are a good fit for Funny Or Die and The Occasional.
    email: [email protected] / subject: InDesign Developer Job

    Locked. Please contact the OP directly.
    Bob

  • Questions on preview quality and where Aperture uses them

    I have been reading Apple's Aperture articles about preview quality and how Aperture shares images with the outside world. I had always assumed that the full quality image in Aperture was used for printing, exporting and sharing, but it seems that, at least for sharing, it is the preview that Aperture creates that is shared.
    I have just increased the quality of the previews that Aperture generates from 5 to 9 and forced Aperture to re-render all previews. It seems to me that the images on screen and in slide shows and other iLife documents, are now much clearer and brighter (the downside of this is that my Aperture library file has grown by 4 gigabytes).
    This leads me to ask four questions about Aperture and preview use (if I may?).
    Is a jpeg on a high setting (9) visibly better than one on a medium setting (5), or am I being led to see what I expect to see?
    Apart from editing, slideshows and iLife and iWork documents, in what situations does Aperture use previews where high or low quality might make a difference?
    Does Aperture use previews to compile photo books? If so, does the quality of the preview affect the quality of the final printed book?
    Is it possible to set Aperture to produce high quality previews for images above a certain star rating and low quality previews for the rest?
    Thanks for any answers you may have.
    Alasdair

    Previews are used within Aperture to quickly show an image in the main viewer before the master has been fully loaded, they are also used to see the referenced masters even if the external location is not available at that moment (not adjustments can be done then, but at least you can see the image)
    Previews are used outside Aperture to share the images with adjustments without exporting every image. It comes in handy that you can drag an image from Aperture's browser to another app or the desktop (what you get there is the preview). iMovie or other iApps use previews, the bigger size and quality the better quality you'll get.
    Once you set up the size and quality of the previews in Aperture's Preferences the previews are created with those settings. I guess you could lower the settings, in the browser select the images you don't need big previews, ctrl+click and 'update preview' to force create low res previews for those. After that you can put the settings back. But if you do any change to those images the previews will be updated. Certainly I don't see the point of having different previews, do some test find the settings that work best for you and keep it like that.
    Turn automatic previews off and create manually the previews you need, I have a smart album with images rated 3 or more stars and I use it to select and create previews manually to those images.

  • Library. Image Preview Quality & weird behaviour.

    Hi. I'll try to explain this the best I can.
    I never noticed this with Lightroom 2.4 ... I don't know if this has always happend but went unnoticed or is just happening after Lightroom 3 was installed.
    You browse the library, the thumbnails, as usual and the first time you click a thumbnail you get a full screen preview, wich quality I suppose is controlled by the 'standard preview quality' setting.
    Once in full screen, click and you get the 1:1 preview (or any other zoom factor, but I chose 1:1). This one is generated previously or as needed.
    I have the standard preview setting at maximum size, maximum quality.
    When I click on a thumbnail to open the full screen preview I get this preview (just cropped and zoomed part to explain what I'm seeing) :
    Notice the jagged lines everywhere ? It's noticiable at normal full screen as somewhat deformed noses, eyes, etc. Here I enlarged it to make it even more evident.
    Well ... then I click to get 1:1 zoom, wich prompts lightroom to generate a 1:1 preview. Once done, I click back to the normal full screen preview. Now, this is the image I see :
    See the change ? Now is softer, there's no jagged lines. No deformed eyes, just a good an clean image.
    Well ... If I close the full screen preview and then I open it again, the image I get is not this second softer version already generated by lightroom after the 1:1 preview ... no, I get the first picture again, the jagged one.
    Even more, If when I'm in thumbnails mode I click an image to get the full screen preview, and then browse the next images in this full screen mode... every image is jagged like this ... BUT, If I first click to enter the 1:1 preview and click back to standard preview ... then ALL the remaining images show the softer version, not the jagged one.
    This only happens in library module, not in the develop module.
    Was this behaviour always present ? Is this a bug ? Is it by design ?
    (I hope I've explained it well enough, it's confusing and english, as you might have noticed by now is not my best language.)
    Any question, help or comment is appreciated.

    I know and hate this bug since version 1.0. It's still there in LR3. And I taught myself how to avoid it.
    You run into this bug when you switch from Grid to Loupe and back by double-clicking the mouse. To avoid it, you should either:
    Use the keyboard shortcuts instead of mouse (Enter, Esc and Z);
    or, in Loupe mode, to switch to Grid, double-click the gray area around the photograph instead of actual image area.
    Steps to reproduce the bug:
    Scenario 1:
    1. Go to grid view.
    2. Double-click a thumbnail to go to Loupe Fit.
        The image is smooth.
    3. Double-click on image (not gray area) to go back to Grid.
    4. Double-click a thumbnail to go to Loupe Fit again.
        The image is jagged.
    5. Zoom to 1:1 and back to Fit.
        The image is smooth.
    Scenario 2:
    1. Go to grid view.
    2. Double-click a thumbnail to go to Loupe Fit.
        The image is smooth.
    3. Double-click on gray area surrounding the image (not the actual image area) to go back to Grid.
    4. Double-clcik a thumbnail to go to Loupe Fit again.
        The image is smooth.
    5. Zoom to 1:1 and back to Fit.
        The image is smooth.

  • Preview Quality of Path Edges

    Is there a way I can improve the preview quality of path edges? From what I can tell, Illustrator is showing me underlying layers, even when it shouldn't.
    For instance, take the following simple drawing:
    Top Layer: Black Fill Square
    Middle Layer: Yellow Fill Square
    BACKGROUND: Black
    If the two squares are exactly the same size and have exactly the same X and Y coordinates, and I zoom out to 100%, I can see the edge of the yellow squares. I spend a great deal of time trying to zoom way in to make sure everything is as pixel perfect as can be (Ok, I know they are vectors). It doesn't matter which preview mode I am in.
    If it matters, my screen resolution is WUXGA (1920x1200) on Windows 7.

    That's what I figured since everything prints fine and if I zoom WAY in, it looks OK, but I was hoping there was a fix.

  • Standard Preview Size/Preview Quality

    This may be a silly question, but in Library mode, under Edit>Catalogue Settings>File Handling, you have options under Preview Cache for 'Standard Preview Size' (1024/1440/1680/2048/2880 pixels) and Preview Quality (High/Medium/Low)... but what do these settings actually do; I've tried changing them & not noticed and difference??

    Les_Cornwell wrote:
    Thanks again Rob
    You bet .
    Les_Cornwell wrote:
    I've tried all the different size options, namely 1024 through to 2880 & low/Medium/high and none make any obvious difference at all.
    So are previews only created as required when you view a picture in full screen mode or does LR create a preview for all your files?
    Every image you look at in Library module comes from the (library) previews, there are up to 8 possible jpegs:
    * a tiny thumbnail in root-pixels.db
    * up to 7 jpegs ranging from small to 1:1 in the "preview pyramid" (each smaller is half the dimensions of it's bigger sibling).
    Try this with a 10 photo test catalog:
    If you have a big monitor and set standard preview size to 1024, then (with Lr closed) delete all previews, then restart Lr and wait for all the "..." indicators to be extinguished (indicating standard previews have been built), then step from photo to photo in loupe view with all panels collapsed (loupe view "real-estate" maximized), you should see "loading" indicator, since it needs a bigger preview than you've got built. What it will do then is build 1:1 previews and all the smaller ones along with it, which is suboptimal from a performance point of view. If you try and zoom in to 1:1 after the "loading", there will be no additional loading, since 1:1 previews were already built.
    Then, repeat the test with preview size at max - no loading indicators, right? (when stepping in loupe view after standard previews have finished being built, I mean). Except now if you try to zoom in there will be "loading", since 1:1 preview were not required to display the loupe view, they will need to be built for the zoomed (1:1) view.
    The only difference between big enough and too big will be an ever-so-slightly greater lag when stepping in the loupe view and no 1:1 preview exists (when preview is too big I mean), since it's loading a bigger standard preview than is actually needed. Reminder: if preview is not big enough, there will be an ever-so-slightly bigger lag when stepping in loupe view too (e.g. vs. just big enough), since it's using the 1:1 preview instead of standard (which wasn't big enough). So, tester beware... (somewhat counter-intuitively, in some cases, it will be faster loading a preview when settings are, in general, too big, because it can get away with loading the next size down, which is an even better fit, e.g. if image is cropped just so - all of these little nuances make it especially tricky to test & evaluate, so consider doing initial tests using uniform-size uncropped images, to reduce the number of variables - it's confusing enough as it is ;-}).
    Note: as previously mentioned, there is considerable complexity (and bugs) in the preview system, and I may not have described it perfectly, so it wouldn't surprise me if your results were not exactly like that, but I just went and retested on my system, and what happened is exactly as I described above (win7/64), as I read it anyway...
    Regarding quality, you should see difference in some photos not others, but ONLY if it didn't resort to the 1:1 preview which may be higher quality than the standard and is independent of the standard quality setting. (I think somebody may have stated that you'd need to zoom in to see differences in standard preview quality settings, but that is wrong - the only way to see differences in standard preview quality settings is if you are in fact viewing standard previews, which you aren't when zoomed in to 1:1, and anyway it can be ellusive - see paragraphs above...).
    PS - If you want to compare jpeg quality of standard previews, one way is to export them using PreviewExporter. Again, it's tricky, since you need to assure you aren't exporting a scaled down version of the 1:1 instead of a true standard preview. After exporting you can compare outside Lightroom, so you don't have the "preview of a preview" issue going... I use Beyond Compare by Scooter Software for doing objective comparison of like-sized jpegs, but you can compare subjectively using any ol' viewer, e.g. as built into OS.
    Too much?
    UPDATE:
    Les_Cornwell wrote:
    does LR create a preview for all your files?
    No - they are created on an as-needed basis (thus the reason we hear many complaints about how stale or non-existent previews should be built in the background, to minimize "loading" in library module, e.g. after making dev changes to a large bunch), but note: standard previews may be considered "needed" when thumbnail is in view in grid or filmstrip (but not considered needed if thumbnail is off-screen, even if existing in filmstrip and/or grid).
    R
    Message was UPDATED by: Rob Cole

  • Adobe animate and InDesign/DPS format?

    How do I get the publish setting in Adobe animate for InDesign/DPS format?

    HI Trish,
    I found an article that could help you http://www.adobe.com/devnet/digitalpublishingsuite/articles/enhancing-your-dps-folios-with -edge-animations.html
    Please go through it and let us know if you need further help.
    Thanks,
    Preran

  • Preview Quality Setting--is low good enough?

    I tried importing a set of images at different preview quality settings: 10 jpegs, 27MB total, 1440 pixels standard preview size. At low quality, standard previews took 1.8MB, adding 1:1 previews increased it to 7.6 MB. Medium quality was 2.9 and 12.8MB, while high was 6.2 and 30.2MB! Doing side-by-side comparisons on-screen, I can see absolutely no difference between low and high-quality previews, either standard or 1:1. Is there any reason not to use the low-quality setting and save a bunch of storage space?

    Fred,
    This is interesting.
    For the standard preview, I definitely see a difference in quality between Low, Medium, and High... the High setting being the only acceptable one for me.
    However, when I have Previews set to Low, and the standard preview looks terrible, once I render the 1:1 preview (keeping the Previews setting to Low), the image looks fine.
    There could be two possible explanations:
    1.) The 'Previews' setting of Low, Medium, & High *does not* apply to 1:1 previews.
    --or--
    2.) Since my image is a 20MP image (huge), even rendering a 'low-quality' 1:1 preview is all right, because by the time you zoom out to fit-to-screen, the resizing/downsampling makes the preview look acceptable.
    Anyone care to chime in on which of the above 2 scenarios is more likely? Or if there is a 3rd that I am missing?
    Thanks,
    Rishi

  • TS1424 i downloaded a song and it shows the time length all to be correct but while playing the song will only play for about 30 seconds then skip to the next song in my list (all lists) - in short i payed for a song that is only of a preview quality

    i downloaded a song and it shows the time length all to be correct but while playing the song will only play for about 30 seconds then skip to the next song in my list (all lists) - in short i payed for a song that is only of a preview quality
    Either this needs to get fixed or i will request my money back because i will not work for my money while other lie about what i spend it on.

    Try deleting the problematic tune (electing to remove original file if/when prompted) and then re-downloading the file from the iTunes store.
    You can re-download content purchased from the iTunes store (availability varies depending on location) using the purchased option from the Quick Links section in the top right corner of the iTunes homepage in your iTunes application on your computer.
    You can re-download content purchased from the iTunes store (availability varies depending on location) using the purchased option at the bottom of the screen of the iTunes app (or video app on your iOS device.
    If the problem re-occurs, select the content which is causing a problem and use the 'Report a problem' button in Your Purchase History using your computer.

  • Adobe InDesign / DPS Query

    Hello,
    Is it possible to create a folio / application and deploy it to multiple (standalone) iPads WITHOUT having to upload it to the Apple App Store using InDesign / DPS?
    Scenario / content:
    I'd like to create a photo album folio and deploy it to a single iPad. I'd then like to offer this service as part of my business and deploy it multiple iPads (if the need arises) without having to upload it via the Apple App Store.
    Any thoughts on if this is possible and if so, how, would be much appreciated.
    SB

    You need to submit the app to apple and will be available in the app store.
    You can create .ipa and sync it on the listed device (in your apple developer account) for testing.
    You can share your folio with anyone who has access to content viewer using adobe ID on their iPad.
    Apart from that if you want to sell your app without submitting it to apple it is not possible.
    Yasin

  • InDesign DPS and iTunes Connect: In-App Purchase won't appear

    Greetings Adobeans,
    first of all: I'm not a native speaker, so please forgive me my maybe erronenous english.
    To my question / problem: The company I'm employed publishes a multi-folio-tourguide-app. It is produced with InDesign DPS and the App Builder, published via Folio Producer and should now be sold at iTunes to the Apple iPad, so the publishing process leads inevitable to iTunes Connect. We already launched the multi-folio-app itself along with a free folio as a free, non-consumable in-app purchase. The app is now online, downloadable and our first folio works fine - even it stays "Waiting for Upload" ... I think, the multi-folio-app tells iTunes Connect to get the data out of the Folio Producer, but I don't know the exact details of how this works.
    The next step was to publish a second, priced in-app purchase.
    Our steps were (they might be useful for a solution, I guess):
    - publishing the folio in the Folio Producer (Status: Public - Trade),
    - creating a non-consumable in-app purchase at iTunes Connect, using the same Product-ID as the folio in the Folio Producer,
    - and uploading a update for the entire app, because Apple and Adobe say so.
    But the folio never appeared in the app. It the iTunes Connect-menu it just stays "Waiting for Upload", like our first, but it won't appear at all.
    My wisdom as a graphic designer has come to it's end a long time ago, Apple told us, that they don't look at these in-app purchases at all and we should ask Adobe for help ... and well, Adobe Help Services sent me to here.
    So, I would be deeply grateful for any help or enlightement.
    Greetings from Germany,
    Der Bäcker Scholz

    If your non-consumable in-app purchase in iTunes Connect is still "Waiting for Upload," it means it's not approved yet. You need to provide the screenshot and complete the in-app purchase submission to Apple. They should approved rather quickly. After a while (sometimes as long as 24 hours), your published folio will appear in your app.
    In the future, submit your in-app purchases to Apple well in advance of publishing the folio. That way, you can publish the folio as Public and Retail, and it will appear in your app right away.

  • User Permissions being corrupted by InDesign DPS Tools

    I am using a Mac Pro, running OSX 10.9.5 (2x2.26 GHz Quad-Core, 14GB DDR3).
    I login with an admin account (I did have no other accounts).
    Earlier this week I installed Adobe Creative Cloud and specifically the Digital Publishing tools. When I try to use the Folio Builder I get an error message "An update is required to use Folio Builder.  Please click here to download the Folio Producer tools."
    I contacted Adobe support about this and they told me it was a user permissions corruption (following 3 hours of chat and phone calls!). They fixed it by creating a second admin user account. The Folio Builder worked using this account, so they then amended the read/write Sharing & Permissions of InDesign in my main account. This fixed the issue. For a day. It then broke again.
    I went back to Adobe and they told me to contact Apple as is an operating system problem. After much arguing I have had enough of Adobe and their passing the buck. I followed this link to reset my user permissions: http://macs.about.com/od/Troubleshooting/qt/Mac-Troubleshooting-Reset-User-Accou nt-Permissions.htm
    This fixed it too. For a day also. I now have the same error.
    The only work-around I have so far is to use InDesign and DPS in the second Admin user account that I have now created. Appears to be fine.
    So, to sum up, my user account permissions appear to being corrupted quickly by the InDesign DPS tools. I am really stumped by this and really frustrated. Any suggestions are welcomed!

    EtreCheck version: 1.9.15 (52)
    Report generated 8 October 2014 10:55:47 BST
    Hardware Information: ?
      Mac Pro (Early 2009) (Verified)
      Mac Pro - model: MacPro4,1
      2 2.26 GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon CPUs: 8 cores
      14 GB RAM
    Video Information: ?
      NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 - VRAM: 512 MB
      SA300/SA350 spdisplays_1080p
      SA300/SA350 spdisplays_1080p
    System Software: ?
      OS X 10.9.5 (13F34) - Uptime: 0 days 2:35:22
    Disk Information: ?
      HL-DT-ST DVD-RW GH41N 
      Hitachi HDE721064SLA360 disk0 : (640.14 GB)
      S.M.A.R.T. Status: Verified
      EFI (disk0s1) <not mounted>: 209.7 MB
      Macintosh HD (disk0s2) / [Startup]: 639.28 GB (278.14 GB free)
      Recovery HD (disk0s3) <not mounted>: 650 MB
    USB Information: ?
      Apple, Inc. Keyboard Hub
      Logitech USB Optical Mouse
      Apple, Inc Apple Keyboard
      Apple Inc. BRCM2046 Hub
      Apple Inc. Bluetooth USB Host Controller
    Gatekeeper: ?
      Mac App Store and identified developers
    Kernel Extensions: ?
      [not loaded] com.FTDI.driver.FTDIUSBSerialDriver (2.2.16) Support
      [loaded] com.GoodLuckTechnology.driver.RecordComputerSound (1.01 - SDK 10.7) Support
      [loaded] com.logmein.driver.LogMeInSoundDriver (1.0.3 - SDK 10.5) Support
      [not loaded] com.wacom.driver.HIDTablet (4.9.0) Support
    Launch Daemons: ?
      [loaded] com.adobe.fpsaud.plist Support
      [loaded] com.adobe.SwitchBoard.plist Support
      [loaded] com.adobe.versioncueCS3.plist Support
      [not loaded] com.logmein.logmeinblanker.plist Support
      [running] com.logmein.logmeinserver.plist Support
      [loaded] com.logmein.raupdate.plist Support
      [loaded] com.microsoft.office.licensing.helper.plist Support
      [not loaded] com.teamviewer.teamviewer_service.plist Support
    Launch Agents: ?
      [not loaded] com.adobe.AAM.Updater-1.0.plist Support
      [running] com.adobe.AdobeCreativeCloud.plist Support
      [failed] com.epson.Epusp.plist Support
      [running] com.epson.epw.agent.plist Support
      [loaded] com.hp.StatusMonitor.plist Support
      [running] com.kodak.BonjourAgent.plist Support
      [failed] com.logmein.LMILaunchAgentFixer.plist Support
      [running] com.logmein.logmeingui.plist Support
      [running] com.logmein.logmeinguiagent.plist Support
      [not loaded] com.logmein.logmeinguiagentatlogin.plist Support
      [not loaded] com.teamviewer.teamviewer.plist Support
      [not loaded] com.teamviewer.teamviewer_desktop.plist Support
    User Launch Agents: ?
      [loaded] com.adobe.AAM.Updater-1.0.plist Support
      [loaded] com.adobe.ARM.[...].plist Support
      [loaded] com.adobe.ARM.[...].plist Support
      [loaded] com.adobe.ARM.[...].plist Support
      [failed] [email protected]
      [running] com.genieo.completer.download.plist Support
      [loaded] com.genieo.completer.update.plist Support
      [loaded] com.google.keystone.agent.plist Support
      [loaded] com.kodak.KODAK AiO Annual Opt.plist Support
      [loaded] com.kodak.KODAK AiO Firmware Updater.plist Support
      [loaded] com.kodak.KODAK AiO Software Updater.plist Support
    User Login Items: ?
      None
    Internet Plug-ins: ?
      LogMeInSafari64: Version: 1.0.730 Support
      Default Browser: Version: 537 - SDK 10.9
      AdobeExManDetect: Version: AdobeExManDetect 1.1.0.0 - SDK 10.7 Support
      Flip4Mac WMV Plugin: Version: 2.3.6.5 Support
      OfficeLiveBrowserPlugin: Version: 12.2.7 Support
      AdobeAAMDetect: Version: AdobeAAMDetect 2.0.0.0 - SDK 10.7 Support
      FlashPlayer-10.6: Version: 15.0.0.152 - SDK 10.6 Support
      AdobePDFViewerNPAPI: Version: 11.0.0 - SDK 10.6 Support
      LogMeIn: Version: 1.0.730 Support
      Flash Player: Version: 15.0.0.152 - SDK 10.6 Support
      LogMeInSafari32: Version: 1.0.730 Support
      iPhotoPhotocast: Version: 7.0
      QuickTime Plugin: Version: 7.7.3
      AdobePDFViewer: Version: 11.0.0 - SDK 10.6 Support
      SharePointBrowserPlugin: Version: 14.4.4 - SDK 10.6 Support
      Silverlight: Version: 4.0.50917.0 Support
    Safari Extensions: ?
      Evernote Web Clipper-2
      AdBlock
    Audio Plug-ins: ?
      BluetoothAudioPlugIn: Version: 1.0 - SDK 10.9
      AirPlay: Version: 2.0 - SDK 10.9
      AppleAVBAudio: Version: 203.2 - SDK 10.9
      iSightAudio: Version: 7.7.3 - SDK 10.9
    iTunes Plug-ins: ?
      Quartz Composer Visualizer: Version: 1.4 - SDK 10.9
    User Internet Plug-ins ?
      Unity Web Player: Version: UnityPlayer version 2.6.1f3 Support
      Google Earth Web Plug-in: Version: 7.1 Support
    3rd Party Preference Panes: ?
      Adobe Version Cue CS3  Support
      Flash Player  Support
      Flip4Mac WMV  Support
      MacFUSE  Support
      NTFS-3G  Support
      Pen Tablet  Support
    Time Machine: ?
      Time Machine not configured!
    Top Processes by CPU: ?
          3% WindowServer
          2% mds
          0% AdobeCrashDaemon
          0% DashboardClient
          0% notifyd
    Top Processes by Memory: ?
      3.85 GB Adobe Photoshop CC 2014
      459 MB Adobe Illustrator
      315 MB Adobe InDesign CC 2014
      215 MB Safari
      201 MB Finder
    Virtual Memory Information: ?
      3.61 GB Free RAM
      7.57 GB Active RAM
      1.78 GB Inactive RAM
      1.03 GB Wired RAM
      2.95 GB Page-ins
      0 B Page-outs

  • InDesign DPS und iTunes Connect: In-App Purchase will nicht funktionieren

    Hallo liebe Adobenten,
    erneut eine Frage zu InDesign DPS und dem dahinter liegenden Prozess im Folio Producer:
    Derzeit veröffentlicht mein Arbeitgeber ein Multi-folio-App via iTunes Connect auf das Apple iPad. Das von Adobe mitgelieferte Tutorial hat hier soweit brauchbare Arbeit geleistet. Wir haben dem Leitfaden entsprechend ein Multi-folio-App erstellt und in iTunes mit einem kostenlosen Folio als Gratis-In-App-Purchase ausgestattet. Das funktioniert auch soweit. Das App ist online, das kostenlose Folio downloadbar und funktional (obwohl es in iTunes Connect stets unter dem Status Waiting for Upload verbleibt - ich nehme an, iTunes bezieht seine Daten aus der veröffentlichten Datei im Folio Producer).
    Als nächstes wollen wir nun seit einer ganzen Weile ein weiteres Folio, diesmal als käufliches Produkt veröffentlichen. Der Prozess war dabei der Selbe: Folio im Folio Producer veröffentlicht (mit dem Unterschied, dass es diesmal nicht Öffentlich-Kostenlos, sondern als Öffentlich-Handel markiert wurde), anschließend im iTunes Connect ein In-App Purchase eröffnet (diesmal mit einem Pricing Tier), dieses mit der selben Produkt-ID ausgestattet und, weil Apple und Adobe das gleichermaßen empfehlen, gleich darauf ein Update des Gesamt-Apps hochgeladen.
    Seitdem hat sich nichts getan. Das neue Folio erschien einmal für eine Minute im Multi-folio-App (konnte aber nicht heruntergeladen werden), ansonsten scheint es so, als wäre die Integration fehlgeschlagen. Beide in In-App Purchases verweilen im Waiting for Upload, das kostenlose Folio ist weiterhin herunterladbar, sein preisgebundener Bruder bleibt unerschienen. Die amerikanischen Foren wissen auch keine Lösung mehr, Apple schiebt alle Verantwortung von sich und der Adobe-Hilfechat schickte mich hierher.
    Für Anregungen oder Eingebungen wäre ich sehr dankbar.
    Grüße,
    Euer Bäcker Scholz

    Danke für die rasche Antwort
    Adobent war ein Wortspiel aus Langeweile, genauso wie Bäcker Scholz aus der totalen Abstinenz von Kreativität für Foren-Nicknames entstand. Ich bin ungefähr so sehr Bäcker wie Astronaut.
    Die DPS ist eine Pro-Version. Soweit ich weiß kann man in der Single Edition sowieso keine Multi-Folio-Apps erstellen.

  • InDesign CS5.5, DPS: Preview error

    I watched an AIGA webinar on "Reinventing the Magazine for the Digital Era", which contained an introduction by Colin Fleming to the DPS offerings, based in InDesign 5.5. I tried to follow along with his examples to begin learning... I downloaded the latest patch so that my extensions were updated - I could play with the Overlay Creator's Image Sequence and Slideshow, and Object States. Colin's next step was to "Preview" what he created.
    I opened the Preview window, but didn't get very far. When I hit Play, I received this error:    Invalid URL for Web Content Overlay
    No url was mentioned in the webinar, so I might not have something set up properly... although I can't seem to find a place for this anyways.
    Anyone have some tips?
    Thanks!

    I'm not sure what's in the folio you uploaded, so it's difficult to say what's wrong with your web content URL. You may want to go through the tutorials to get up to speed. Here's a link to getting started content:
    http://help.adobe.com/en_US/digitalpubsuite/using/WS67cb9e293e2f1f60174dc2eb12f2ca67c28-80 00.html

  • Help please! In InDesign DPS, my folio files are fine, but when previewing, random elements disappear?

    I have been working on these files now for a long time. All of a sudden, when I updated my Folio recently and previewed it, random elements disappeared from view. Images, text, buttons, all are just not visible at random. Please help me out as I need to get this published ASAP!
    I tried resetting my preferences, and I updated my DPS Tools... not sure what else to do.
    Thank you.

    See here for 'Preview on Device'

Maybe you are looking for