Individual period split for Period Totals

Hi there,
If I maintain a new Individual period (T-code : OMDA) with valuse 3 under days & 4 under weeks then as per my understanding in period total we will have 3 months reqirement in days & next 4 months requireement in Weeks.
Am I correct ??
Second thing is that I want that further 5 months requireement to be seen in months ...... how I can do the same .......
Regards
Kaushik

Hi,
Pls check the below link,
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_470/helpdata/en/16/244237b8d67e70e10000009b38f936/content.htm
Anil

Similar Messages

Period total field in my work/Task scree

I noticed that the user can enter their taks time using the Period Total field in My work/task screen. The system is equally dividing the time for the entire period. There is any way we can make thsi field read only?
Thank you

No way out of the box.Gary Chefetz, MCITP, MCP, MVP msProjectExperts
Project and Project ServerFAQs
Project Server Help BLOG

MDX Script for Caluclate total year

Hi ,
I need to calculate total year for actual and forecast data in essbae aso cube .Already we have MDX script for calculate actual and forecast .and now we need to calculate total year .
Kindly any one can help me on this .
Script we used :
Case
When CurrentMember ([Years]) is [FY06] Then ([Scenario].[Actual],[Version].[Final])
When CurrentMember ([Years]) is [FY07] Then ([Scenario].[Actual],[Version].[Final])
When CurrentMember ([Years]) is [FY08] Then ([Scenario].[Actual],[Version].[Final])
When CurrentMember ([Years]) is [FY09] Then ([Scenario].[Actual],[Version].[Final])
When (CurrentMember ([Years]) is [FY10] AND CurrentMember ([Period]) is [Jan]) Then ([Scenario].[Actual],[Version].[Final])
When (CurrentMember ([Years]) is [FY10] AND CurrentMember ([Period]) is [Feb]) Then ([Scenario].[Actual],[Version].[Final])
When (CurrentMember ([Years]) is [FY10] AND CurrentMember ([Period]) is [Mar]) Then ([Scenario].[Actual],[Version].[Final])
When (CurrentMember ([Years]) is [FY10] AND CurrentMember ([Period]) is [Apr]) Then ([Scenario].[Actual],[Version].[Final])
When (CurrentMember ([Years]) is [FY10] AND CurrentMember ([Period]) is [May]) Then ([Scenario].[Actual],[Version].[Final])
When (CurrentMember ([Years]) is [FY10] AND CurrentMember ([Period]) is [Jun]) Then ([Scenario].[Actual],[Version].[Final])
When (CurrentMember ([Years]) is [FY10] AND CurrentMember ([Period]) is [Jul]) Then ([Scenario].[Current Forecast],[Version].[Working])
When (CurrentMember ([Years]) is [FY10] AND CurrentMember ([Period]) is [Aug]) Then ([Scenario].[Current Forecast],[Version].[Working])
When (CurrentMember ([Years]) is [FY10] AND CurrentMember ([Period]) is [Sep]) Then ([Scenario].[Current Forecast],[Version].[Working])
When (CurrentMember ([Years]) is [FY10] AND CurrentMember ([Period]) is [Oct]) Then ([Scenario].[Current Forecast],[Version].[Working])
When (CurrentMember ([Years]) is [FY10] AND CurrentMember ([Period]) is [Nov]) Then ([Scenario].[Current Forecast],[Version].[Working])
When (CurrentMember ([Years]) is [FY10] AND CurrentMember ([Period]) is [Dec]) Then ([Scenario].[Current Forecast],[Version].[Working])
When CurrentMember ([Years]) is [FY11] Then ([Scenario].[Current Forecast],[Version].[Working])
When CurrentMember ([Years]) is [FY12] Then ([Scenario].[Current Forecast],[Version].[Working])
Else
Missing
End
In above script Jan to June is actual data and Jul to Dec is forecast data .now we need write MDX script for calculate total years .
We have substitute veritable is Endmost for actual and startMo for forecast .can we use these variables in script?
i am trying below script but i am getting some errors :
case
when (currentmember([Years]) is [FY10]) then
sum(crossjoin{(([Scenario].[Actual]),([Version].[Final])),([jan],[Feb],[Mar],[Apr],[May],[june])}+
sum(crossjoin{(([Scenario].[Current Forecast],[Version].[Working])),([July],[Aug],[Sept],[Oct],[Nov],[Dec]))}
end
is this script is correct and also let me know how we can use substitute veritable in FASO MD scripts.
Thanks,
vi

Yes. That makes sense to craete a calculated member( say FYF) and apllying the logic you have told.
Can see the required result at the total year level.
And it is always better not to change the actulas and forecast cosolidation at the total year level.

No split for particular key figure while "Time Distribution in Update Rule"

Hi experts,
I wanted to have data in the infocube at day level. Currently it has only week level data. So I used "Time Distribution in Update Rule". Due to this am able to split 0Calweek data at 0calday.
But while using "Time Distribution in Update Rule" all key figures are getting split by same way. For e.g. key fig1 has week level data as 100. so after getting split in calday, it is apperaring as (100/7) 14.285 . for every day.
But i dont want to happen this split for every key figure. For some key figures value "100" should be as it for every field in calday. for e.g. 100 should not get divided by 7 and posted as 100 only for all seven days.
How can i achieve this? Is it possible if i write formula or routine for particular key figure so that split should not take place for that particular kay figure? Or is there any other to keep exception?
Please help.
Thanks

Hi,
This is one of the limitation of Time Distribution that you can not have it by individual key figure. Check the below article for more information,
[http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/e0e1096a-e058-2c10-06b7-c66f9a82a9c8?QuickLink=index&overridelayout=true]
I think in this case you will have to write individual routine for each key figure instead of Time Distribution approach.
Regards,
Durgesh.

WT reporter does not show split for tax authorities!

Dear all:
I need to report for all employees some WTs of taxes, but wt reporter does not show the splits for them (to distinguish federal from statal authorities payments), it is like summarises all the same WTs... I tried payroll recon. report but this one does not output the data in ALV format (im in 4.6 version) so it is not useful to run in bulk
Do you have any work around for this?
I would appreciate any tip or workaround on this,
Thank you!

Hi
1. Allocated costs are always treated as Fixed costs, unless you have booked the expenses in FI using Activity Type as Aux Account assignment object
2. Check whether these costs are included in Inventory valuation in your Cost Comp Str in OKTZ... If not relevant for inv valuation, these costs wont show up for Variance calculations
br, Ajay M

Are clusters or individual elements better for shared variables?

So... I have some RT code that is being updated, and pulled out of the Stone Ages of LabVIEW. It was originally written for an old FieldPoint controller operating in "headless" mode, and used the "publish" and datasocket methods for communications and external control. I had to get clever way back then, and put together a parsing/unparsing system for strings to send sets of data back and forth between the controller and any HMI or other computer attached.
Now, I'm completely rewriting the code for a cRIO system, and doing my best to leverage all of the strengths of the latest LabVIEW versions. I have already done an intermediate stage, where I converted from the publish/datasocket method to using network shared variables for my strings, so I could keep some of the original control and calculation logic. Now, however, I'm going back to the drawing board for most of the program, with only some of the proven logic being held over into the new version. And, as I'm putting together the data structures I need for both internal control and external communication, I'm in a bit of a quandary...
I have come upon a data structure dilemma: should I use individual shared variables for my data, or assemble associated data into clusters? My original program had a string (essentially a flattened cluster) for each sensor in use (up to 4), one for the system parameters and states, and one for the control parameters and states. There was a certain advantage to keeping the data compartmentalized like that, it kept things organized and forced me to avoid too many random references of each data point. And it kept the number of communications channels limited to just a handful. Mimicking this structure with cluster shared variables would be easy. But, I'm not sure it's the best or most network-efficient method.
I know the bundling/unbundling will add some processor time in my code, that is not new to me (it will still be much faster than my old parsing routines). But, if I have individual data points being thrown around, I can access them easily from things like Data Dashboard (which is great, but far too limited to be able to grab items in clusters and such). Having all of my data points individually available would make my project messier, but open up easier access. It would also dramatically increase the number of data points being thrown around on the network at any one moment. For reference, I would probably have a maximum of 100 data points at one time, made up of a combination of integers, floats, booleans, integer arrays, boolean arrays. Or I would have a maximum of 8 clusters that would contain those data points.
Any suggestions on which way I should lean? Are there any advantages/disadvantages between shared clusters like the ones I need vs. the number of individual shared variables I would need using the alternative methods? Network traffic and efficiency are always a concern, particularly since this is a "headless" cRIO in a control situation that must maintain a fast scan rate...
Thanks for any help. I'm so stuck on this fence, and I can't figure out which side to fall off!
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Thanks Tim, that is a great source that I somehow missed in my hunt for information regarding my dilemna...
I have to wonder though, does that 25 number also include the I/O points on your cRIO? Anyone know that particular? Most of the I/O points are network shared by default during initial configuration, and you could very quickly exceed 25 variables on an 8 slot rack (such as the one I use, a 9074). Now I'm a bit worried that I'm overusing the variable engine, even before the communications clusters get figured in...

How to write a case statement for the totals column of two different years (2013 and 2014) of the same month so that I can get a +/- column

Please Help!!!
How to write a case statement for the totals column of two different years (2013 and 2014) of the same month so that I can get a +/- column.
                                  January 2014         January
2013                            +/-
                Region   Entry   Exit Total    Entry   Exit   Total   (Total of Jan2014-Total of Jan2013)
                A               2         3
40        5       7        30                    40-30= 10

What is a table structure? Sorry cannot test it right now..
SELECT <columns>,(SELECT Total FROM tbl WHERE Y=2014)-(SELECT Total FROM tbl WHERE Y=2013)
FROM tbl
Best Regards,Uri Dimant SQL Server MVP,
http://sqlblog.com/blogs/uri_dimant/
MS SQL optimization: MS SQL Development and Optimization
MS SQL Consulting:
Large scale of database and data cleansing
Remote DBA Services:
Improves MS SQL Database Performance
SQL Server Integration Services:
Business Intelligence

Deactivate document splitting for company code in IDES

Hi,
am not able to deactivate document splitting. When I try to deactivate and then save an error pop up show the message 'Define the commitment item as a document splitting characteristics ' .
The path for Deactivating the Doc splitting is
SPRO---Financial Accounting(New) --- GL Accounting(New) -Business transactions-- Document splitting -
Activate document splitting------ Double click on Deactivation per company code.
When i try in this path it will not allow me to save and it will not allow me to post any g/l entry also.
Please Advise.

I think the error is coming due to the other company codes for which document splitting is active. Because, when you save (after deactivating doc split for your company code), I guess the system is checking the properties for other company codes in the same screen for which doc split is not deactivated.
What document splitting characteristics do you have in your system? And what are the settings there? Check in SPRO -> Financial Accounting (New) -> GL Accounting (New) -> Business Transactions -> Document Splitting -> Define Document Splitting Characteristics for GL Accounting. My guess is there is nothing in there. Create (may be, PRCTR) as your document splitting characteristic, save, and then try deactivating doc split for your company code in the IMG node that you mentioned. Not sure if this is the reason, but no harm in trying!

Document Split for Currency Exchange while posting Incoming payment

Hi Experts,
Scenario:
> Post incoming Customer payments using F-28
> posting entered today (14 Jan 2009), but posting date is 30 Dec 2008)
> Tested in Clients 001 and 005 (same setup in terms of GLs, Customers, Vendors, etc)
I was able to post the incoming payment in Client 005. However, in Client 001, I got error message:
*Ex.rate diff.accts are incomplete for account 0000140000 (Trade Debtors/Customers) currency SGD
Message no. F5063
Diagnosis
The accounts for posting exchange rate differences could not be determined. For the specified G/L account and the specified currency key, the accounts are only specified incompletely. Either the accounts for the implemented exchange rate difference, the accounts for the valuation differences or the balance sheet adjustment account are missing.
System Response
The system cannot generate the exchange rate difference posting.
Procedure
By pressing ENTER, you achieve that the document is reset to a status without automatic posting. In another window, you can complete default settings for exchange rate differences and post the document afterwards.
Proceed*
When I clicked Proceed, the system took me to OBA1, with "Document Split for Currency Exchange" option highlighted in blue.
Does this mean that I need to create a new GL account to post Document Split for Currency Exchange?
Note: Setup for OBA1 both 001 and 005 are the same. But I only encountered the error in 001.
Hope someone can help me.
Thanks...

problem solved: add relevant Open Item GLs in OBA1 (Account Determination for OI Exchange Rate Differences)

Delivery Split for PO

I want to split delivery creation for 'NL' type of delivery for STPO i.e. 'UB' type.
i.e. if a PO has 2 materials with different material types ( e.g FERT & HAWA ), then 2 different deliveries have to be created in this case automatically.
How can the same be achieved.

If you want a permanent Solution on this you will have to take the help of a Routine.
If you want to manually force a delivery split for each line item in the Purchase Order, then give a different value in the "Unloading Point" field for each item.
Unloading Point field is there at Item level in the Shipping Tab in PO.
There are positives and negatives of this approach.
Positive being that since Unloading Points are different for each line item in PO, there will be a seperate delivery for each line item.
Negative is that since the Unloading Field value is defaulted from the PO into the delivery at header (Goto>Header>shipment) you will have a seperate Invoice for each delivery as the Unloading points are different for each delivery. You will not be able to have a consolidated Invoice.

Avoid billing split for different partners

Dear all,
I'd like to avoid invoice split for 2 billing items whose partner function (VE) in a sales order are different.
I tried to create a routine in the copy control in VOFM, but it seems that the value of the partner (VBPA-PERNR) could not be passed into the routine.
Am I do it a wrong way? Is there any other method, e.g. change the standard program "MV60ATOP" ??
Please kindly advise. Thanks!

Hi,
I think, billing split based on the partner is the standard functionality and you cannot over-ride this using custom routine.
Regards
Vinod

Batch splitting for Outbound delivery using BAPI_OUTB_DELIVERY_CHANGE

Hi all,
Let me explain the scenario first.
We are going to create a delivery in SAP with some line items and send it to a non-sap third party WMS. They will pick the goods and send the delivery confirmation back to SAP. In SAP we need to delivery confirmation and PGI.
The problem is when the third Part WMS does a batch split for a particular line item, we need to update the same in SAP and then do the PGI. For this I was trying to use BAPI_OUTB_DELIVERY_CHANGE to create split batches. It is splitting the batches but the overall pick status is becoming B (Partially picked). SO it is not allowing to do the PGI.
Can anyone solve my problem

Hi Bala,
make sure you are setting...
itemdata-dlv_qty
itemdata-dlv_qty_imunit
itemdata-fact_unit_nom e.g = 1.
itemdata-fact_unit_denom e.g = 1.
Rgds
Glenn

Help - i recently made put together a high quality movie for a relative, it has taken me months to complete and it goes for a total of 9 hours and 43 minutes ,however, it won't let me export the video at all! please help - its taken ages to make it!

Help - i recently made put together a high quality movie for a relative, it has taken me months to complete and it goes for a total of 9 hours and 43 minutes ,however, it won't let me export the video at all! please help - its taken ages to make it!

9 hours??!
Twice the length of a cinema epic?
How are you expecting to distribute it?
iDVD encoding settings:
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?path=iDVD/7.0/en/11417.html
Short version:
Best Performance is for videos of up to 60 minutes
Best Quality is for videos of up to 120 minutes
Professional Quality is also for up to 120 minutes but even higher quality (and takes much longer)
That was for single-layer DVDs. Double these numbers for dual-layer DVDs.
Professional Quality: The Professional Quality option uses advanced technology to encode your video, resulting in the best quality of video possible on your burned DVD. You can select this option regardless of your project’s duration (up to 2 hours of video for a single-layer disc and 4 hours for a double-layer disc). Because Professional Quality encoding is time-consuming (requiring about twice as much time to encode a project as the High Quality option, for example) choose it only if you are not concerned abo
In both cases the maximum length includes titles, transitions and effects etc. Allow about 15 minutes for these.
You can use the amount of video in your project as a rough determination of which method to choose. If your project has an hour or less of video (for a single-layer disc), choose Best Performance. If it has between 1 and 2 hours of video (for a single-layer disc), choose High Quality. If you want the best possible encoding quality for projects that are up to 2 hours (for a single-layer disc), choose Professional Quality. This option takes about twice as long as the High Quality option, so select it only if time is not an issue for you.
Use the Capacity meter in the Project Info window (choose Project > Project Info) to determine how many minutes of video your project contains.
NOTE: With the Best Performance setting, you can turn background encoding off by choosing Advanced > “Encode in Background.” The checkmark is removed to show it’s no longer selected. Turning off background encoding can help performance if your system seems sluggish.
And whilst checking these settings in iDVD Preferences, make sure that the settings for NTSC/PAL and DV/DV Widescreen are also what you want.
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1502?viewlocale=en_US

Budget Report to show the fixed and variable split for Materials

Hello Gurus,
Could you tell me if there is a budget standards report that will show the fixed and variable split for Materials? Example: Labor, Equip., QC and Overheads?
I need it for the correctly rolled-up 'final material number' step. The report that does this now (without fixed and var split) is the Indented BOM Comparison (sret - cost mgmt-product costing - cost mgmt-customized reports - cost estimate comparison - costed multilevel compare rpt - Indented BOM Comparison).
Thanks,
Jefferson

one simple way is in your final itab declare a slno type i field
data : begin of itab occurs 0,
slno type i,
<other fields>
end of itab.
after filling the data in itab.
loop at itab.
itab-slno = sy-tabix.
modify itab.
endloop.
in fieldcatalog also you have to define that slno field as the first column.
but it will change its order if you are sorting the output or filtering the output.
regards
shiba dutta

Tables for Vendor Totals

Hi
What are the tables for Vendor Totals.
Regards
Rupal

Vendors it is LFC1.
or
Please use for vendor balances:-
S_AC0_52000888
Regards,
vendor use table BSAK , BSIK

Individual period split for Period Totals

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for