Infoobject contains whole hierarchy query contains partialy hierarchy
hi experts,
in BI3.5 when loading hierarchy to an Infoobject I get only part of it in the BEX query
the att/hier change run is empty
how can i see the whole hierarchy in bex query
thanks
nir
Hi Nir,
Check the setting for expand to level in the hierarchy property of the characteristic in the query .
You can also check the corresponding hierarchy in RSH1 in hierarchy attributes the drill down start level.
[ Go to Hierarchy parameter in this link for characteristic properties|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/en/1a/25213c9cffa027e10000000a11402f/content.htm]
Hope this helps,
Best regards,
Sunmit.
Similar Messages
-
Hierarchy Query to get parent nodes?
Hi Everyone,
I want to write a hierarchy query which should give me the path starting from given node to its parents(Grand parents). below is the sample data and the output what i am expecting. and also the output what i am getting right now from my query.
CREATE TABLE RELATION (PARENT VARCHAR2(5),CHILD VARCHAR2(5) PRIMARY KEY);
--Data for the tree which starts from the root 'A'
Insert into RELATION (PARENT, CHILD) Values (NULL,'A');
Insert into RELATION (PARENT, CHILD) Values ('A', 'B');
Insert into RELATION (PARENT, CHILD) Values ('A', 'C');
Insert into RELATION (PARENT, CHILD) Values ('B', 'D');
Insert into RELATION (PARENT, CHILD) Values ('B', 'E');
Insert into RELATION (PARENT, CHILD) Values ('D', 'F');
Insert into RELATION (PARENT, CHILD) Values ('C', 'G');
--Data for the tree which starts from the root 'H'
Insert into RELATION (PARENT, CHILD) Values (NULL,'H');
Insert into RELATION (PARENT, CHILD) Values ('H', 'I');
Insert into RELATION (PARENT, CHILD) Values ('H', 'J');
Expected Output by passing values as 'F' which gives the path from bottom to up.
A<-B<-D<-F
My Query:
SELECT substr(sys_connect_by_path(child,'<-'),3)
FROM relation
WHERE connect_by_isleaf = 1
START WITH child = 'F'
CONNECT BY PRIOR parent = child
ORDER BY child;
Output of my query:
F<-D<-B<-A
I am getting the output in reverse order. i can use the reverse string function to reverse the string but the problem is the node can also contain the values like 'AC' 'BA'.. in future.
Can anyone please help me in getting the correct output.
Thank you in advance.I like ListAgg :D
with RELATION(PARENT,CHILD) as(
select NULL,'A' from dual union all
select 'A', 'B' from dual union all
select 'A', 'C' from dual union all
select 'B', 'D' from dual union all
select 'B', 'E' from dual union all
select 'D', 'F' from dual union all
select 'C', 'G' from dual union all
select NULL,'H' from dual union all
select 'H', 'I' from dual union all
select 'H', 'J' from dual)
SELECT ListAgg(child,'<-')
within group(order by Level desc) as revPath
FROM relation
START WITH child = 'F'
CONNECT BY PRIOR parent = child;
revPath
A<-B<-D<-F -
Get only last level in SQL Hierarchy Query
Hi,
How to get only the last level in Oracle SQL Hierarchy Query?
ThanksHi,
1007372 wrote:
Hi,
How to get only the last level in Oracle SQL Hierarchy Query?Depending on your requirements:
WHERE CONNECT_BY_ISLEAF = 1
I hope this answers your question.
If not, post a little sample data (CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements, relevant columns only), and also post the results you want from that data.
Explain, using specific examples, how you get those results from that data.
If you can show what you want to do using commonly available tables (such as scott.emp, which contains a hierarchy), then you don't need to post any sample data; just the results and the explanation.
Always say which version of Oracle you're using (e.g., 11.2.0.2.0). This is always important, but especially so with CONNECT BY queries, because every version since Oracle 7 has had significant improvements in this area.
See the forum FAQ {message:id=9360002} -
Hierarchy Query For Full Tree ?
Hi Everyone,
I want to write a hierarchy query which should give me the whole path starting from root node to each individual nodes by passing value of any individual tree member. below is the sample data and the output what i am expecting. and also the output what i am getting right now from my query.
CREATE TABLE RELATION (PARENT VARCHAR2(1),CHILD VARCHAR2(1) PRIMARY KEY);
--Data for the tree which starts from the root 'A'
Insert into RELATION (PARENT, CHILD) Values (NULL,'A');
Insert into RELATION (PARENT, CHILD) Values ('A', 'B');
Insert into RELATION (PARENT, CHILD) Values ('A', 'C');
Insert into RELATION (PARENT, CHILD) Values ('B', 'D');
Insert into RELATION (PARENT, CHILD) Values ('B', 'E');
Insert into RELATION (PARENT, CHILD) Values ('D', 'F');
Insert into RELATION (PARENT, CHILD) Values ('C', 'G');
--Data for the tree which starts from the root 'H'
Insert into RELATION (PARENT, CHILD) Values (NULL,'H');
Insert into RELATION (PARENT, CHILD) Values ('H', 'I');
Insert into RELATION (PARENT, CHILD) Values ('H', 'J');
Expected Output by passing values as 'C' which gives the whole tree where the node C is present:
A
A->B
A->C
A->B->D
A->B->E
A->C->G
A->B->D->F
My Query:
select
sys_connect_by_path(child,'->') tree
from
relation
--where (parent ='C' or child='C')
start with
parent is null
connect by
prior child = parent
order by tree;
Output of my query:
->A
->A->B
->A->B->D
->A->B->D->F
->A->B->E
->A->C
->A->C->G
->H
->H->I
->H->J
I am not able to add the condition for the query so that i can get only rows of the tree where the nod 'C' is present. i am just getting whole data from the table with all the unwanted trees.
Can anyone please help me in getting the correct output.
Thank you in advance.odie_63 wrote:
Another solution, involving analytics : Hierarchical queries and analytic functions do not mix well together in 10g:
SQL> select * from v$version
2 /
BANNER
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Prod
PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
CORE 10.2.0.4.0 Production
TNS for 32-bit Windows: Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
SQL> SELECT tree
2 FROM (
3 select sys_connect_by_path(child,'->') tree,
4 max(case when child = 'C' then connect_by_root(child) end) over() root1,
5 connect_by_root(child) root2
6 from relation
7 start with parent is null
8 connect by prior child = parent
9 )
10 WHERE root1 = root2
11 ;
from relation
ERROR at line 6:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [qctcte1], [0], [], [], [], [], [], []
SQL> Although it is much better in 11g:
SQL> select * from v$version
2 /
BANNER
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
CORE 11.2.0.1.0 Production
TNS for 32-bit Windows: Version 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.1.0 - Production
SQL> SELECT tree
2 FROM (
3 select sys_connect_by_path(child,'->') tree,
4 max(case when child = 'C' then connect_by_root(child) end) over() root1,
5 connect_by_root(child) root2
6 from relation
7 start with parent is null
8 connect by prior child = parent
9 )
10 WHERE root1 = root2
11 ;
TREE
->A
->A->B
->A->B->D
->A->B->D->F
->A->B->E
->A->C
->A->C->G
7 rows selected.
SQL> SY. -
Column name in a query contains special characters
Hi folks,
The column name in a query contains special characters. For example ~ or ^. The creator of the table put these column names under double quotation while creating the table. When I get the column names form the result set meta data object it returns without quotation. Is there any way to tell the jdbc driver so that it return those column names as it was created, I mean in double quotation.
The help is urgent. I will appreciate any suggestions. Thanks �.
[using oracle driver for 10g]
Thanks
AngelinaJust because the column names were in quotations when the database was created doesn't mean that the quotes are actually part of the names. What's inside the quotes is what makes the column name in the database. If I created a column as "abcd" and put it in quotes just like that ("abcd"), it would go in the database as abcd since SQL would strip off the quotes.
And there's your answer. Just put all column names in quotes whenever you need to talk to SQL. It will strip off the quotes and understand.
I think SQL will also accept square brackets ([ and ]). -
Hello All,
I have searched OTN and AskTom and saw many articles on hierarchial query but I just cannot seem to figure out how to apply it to my situation. Based on what I have read I do not believe CUBE or ROLLUP is the answer for this (maybe wrong..).
This data is only a small part of a much larger query used for auditing purposes, so i would need to incorporate the solution for this into the larger query.
Part of my problem is how to actual present this data in a format that would make sense to the end user, when included in a tabular (Excel) report.
I am trying to devise a way to verify that monthly payment is received for each product. In this case, some of the products are "created" under another product and then billed under a 3rd product.
To explain the table
Prod_1 - list all products
Prod_2 - lists only those products that are the parent of an item in the Prod_1 column.
Prod_3 - shows there is a relationship between an item in Prod_1 that is not in Prod_2.
There may be items in Prod_1 that have no relationship to Prod_2 or Prod_3 are those are just billed or *not getting billed BAD*
There are other cases where there is a item in Prod_2 that is the parent of one or more items in Prod_1 but not related to Prod_3 and those are billed.
There are other cases where there is a item in Prod_2 that is the parent of one or more items in Prod_1 but not related to Prod_3 and *not getting billed BAD*
For example:
+1-abcd-efgh, 3-qrst-uvwx and 5-ghij-klmn+ under Prod_1 is created under Prod_2 +1234-2f-maker-taker+ but billed under Prod_3 +87-test-789101+ at $139.11 MONTH_CHARGE.
CREATE TABLE PRODT ( design_id VARCHAR2(50), Prod_1 VARCHAR2(50), Prod_2 VARCHAR2(50), Prod_3 VARCHAR2(50), Month_Charge NUMBER );
INSERT INTO PRODT VALUES ( '8568','1-abcd-efgh', '1234-2f-maker-taker','', 0 );
INSERT INTO PRODT VALUES ( '8569','2-ijkl-mnop', '5678-3f-maker-taker','', 0 );
INSERT INTO PRODT VALUES ( '8570','3-qrst-uvwx', '1234-2f-maker-taker','', 0 );
INSERT INTO PRODT VALUES ( '8571','4-yzab-cdef', '5678-3f-maker-taker','', 0 );
INSERT INTO PRODT VALUES ( '8572','5-ghij-klmn', '1234-2f-maker-taker','', 0 );
INSERT INTO PRODT VALUES ( '9421','1234-2f-maker-taker','','87-test-789101', 0 );
INSERT INTO PRODT VALUES ( '9588','5678-3f-maker-taker','','88-test-123456', 0 );
INSERT INTO PRODT VALUES ( '2531','87-test-789101', '', '1234-2f-maker-taker',139.11 );
INSERT INTO PRODT VALUES ( '2532','88-test-123456', '','5678-3f-maker-taker', 159.45 );
INSERT INTO PRODT VALUES ( '4531','76-test-101568', '', '',145.00 );
INSERT INTO PRODT VALUES ( '3528','6-abcd-efgh', '2234-1f-maker-taker','', 0 );
INSERT INTO PRODT VALUES ( '3529','7-ijkl-mnop', '2234-1f-maker-taker','', 0 );
INSERT INTO PRODT VALUES ( '6261','2234-1f-maker-taker','','', 0 );
COMMIT; Desired Result:
Honestly - I am not sure of the best way to present it - definetly open for suggestions!
The table shows there is a relationship by Product Number, but the table does not make it clear that as in the example above that
all of the underlying products are being billed under +87-test-789101+ at $139.11 per month.
I must still show all of the Prod columns - so for my understanding Cube or Rollup is not a good fit(?).
That is what I am trying to accomplish - in other words I am getting paid for everything or not?
In my mind I see it something like this perhaps:
DESIGN_ID PROD_1 PROD_2 PROD_3 MONTH_CHARGE BILL_INDICATOR
8569 2-ijkl-mnop 5678-3f-maker-taker NULL 0 ? (Not sure how to indicate
8571 4-yzab-cdef 5678-3f-maker-taker NULL 0 what should be displayed
9588 5678-3f-maker-taker NULL 88-test-123456 0 in this new column to make
2532 88-test-123456 NULL 5678-3f-maker-taker 159.45 the Audit process simple *Help Needed*)Thanks for looking!
G
Edited by: GMoney on Aug 22, 2012 12:54 PM
Edited by: GMoney on Aug 22, 2012 12:57 PMFrank,
I was hoping you would cross paths with this post.
I am building on a TOP N query you helped me with in another post.
As I mentioned in my an initial post, I have products that may be in a hierarchical order (or stand alone) could be billed as primary or with secondary or tertiary products that are billed under the primary. Meaning the primary would have a dollar figure associated, and may or may not have secondary or tertiary products related to it.
To explain the table
Prod_1 - list all products
Prod_2 - lists only those products that are the parent of an item in the Prod_1 column.
Prod_3 - shows there is a relationship between an item in Prod_1 that is not in Prod_2.
There may be items in Prod_1 that have no relationship to Prod_2 or Prod_3 are those are just billed or not getting billed BAD
There are other cases where there is a item in Prod_2 that is the parent of one or more items in Prod_1 but not related to Prod_3 and those are billed.
There are other cases where there is a item in Prod_2 that is the parent of one or more items in Prod_1 but not related to Prod_3 and not getting billed BAD
My business requirement is to present all of the results from the initial query as well as adding in the dollar figures from an addition query against another financial table. I need to be able to make it perfectly clear to an end user auditor that each and every product is being billed, and clearly identify the secondary or tertiary items if there are any that fall under that primary product.
My real hung up here is the presentation of the data. I can easily see the correlation between them but it is not likely an end user would.
DESIGN_ID PROD_1 PROD_2 PROD_3 MONTH_CHARGE BILL_INDICATOR
8569 2-ijkl-mnop 5678-3f-maker-taker NULL 0 ? (Not sure how to indicate
8571 4-yzab-cdef 5678-3f-maker-taker NULL 0 what should be displayed
9588 5678-3f-maker-taker NULL 88-test-123456 0 in this new column to make
2532 88-test-123456 NULL 5678-3f-maker-taker 159.45 ; the Audit process simple *Help Needed*) Thanks for looking,
Greg -
Hi All..
I have a hierarchy query with description as below
SQL> desc manager_entity;
Name Null? Type
MANAGER_ENTITY_ID NOT NULL NUMBER
MANAGER_ENTITY_TYPE_ID NOT NULL NUMBER
MANAGER_ENTITY_PARENT_ID NUMBER
CREATE_USER NOT NULL VARCHAR2(50)
CREATE_DATETIME NOT NULL DATE
LAST_UPDATE_USER NOT NULL VARCHAR2(50)
LAST_UPDATE_DATETIME NOT NULL DATE
MANAGER_ENTITY_LINK_ID NOT NULL NUMBERI got the correct relation between the parent and child using the below query
select me.manager_entity_id
, me.manager_entity_type_id
, me.manager_entity_parent_id
, me.manager_entity_link_id
, level
from manager_entity me
start with me.manager_entity_id=:p_id
connect by prior me.manager_entity_id=me.manager_entity_parent_idWhen I try to join this table with other 3 tables I’m unable to retrieve data. Description of the other 3 tables
SQL> desc manager_product;
Name Null? Type
MANAGER_PRODUCT_ID NOT NULL NUMBER
MANAGER_PRODUCT_NAME NOT NULL VARCHAR2(50)
MANAGER_ROOF_ID NOT NULL NUMBER
ACT_STRATEGY VARCHAR2(50)
ACT_SUB_STRATEGY VARCHAR2(50)
ACT_DATE_ENTERED DATE
ACT_INCEPTION_DATE DATE
ACT_PEER_GROUP VARCHAR2(50)
BACK_OFFICE_RISK_ID NUMBER
AREA_ID NUMBER
ACT_CREATE_DATE DATE
PROCESS_STOP_DATE DATE
TARGET_COMPLETION_DATE DATE
REVISIT_DATE DATE
CREATE_USER VARCHAR2(50)
CREATE_DATETIME DATE
LAST_UPDATE_USER VARCHAR2(50)
LAST_UPDATE_DATETIME DATE
SQL> desc manager_roof;
Name Null? Type
MANAGER_ROOF_ID NOT NULL NUMBER
MANAGER_ROOF_NAME NOT NULL VARCHAR2(50)
ROOF_COMPANY_ID NOT NULL NUMBER
CREATE_USER VARCHAR2(50)
CREATE_DATETIME DATE
LAST_UPDATE_USER VARCHAR2(50)
LAST_UPDATE_DATETIME DATE
SQL> desc investment_vehicle;
Name Null? Type
INVESTMENT_VEHICLE_ID NOT NULL NUMBER
INVESTMENT_VEHICLE_NAME NOT NULL VARCHAR2(255)
INVESTMENT_VEHICLE_ARRT_NAME VARCHAR2(255)
INVESTIER_SYSID NUMBER
INVESTIER_ID VARCHAR2(100)
MANAGER_PRODUCT_ID NUMBER
TRADING_STRUCTURE_TYPE_ID NUMBER
LEGAL_DESIGNATION_ID NUMBER
ADDITIONAL_INVEST_FORM_TYPE_ID NUMBER
INVESTMENT_VEH_CLASS_TYPE_ID NUMBER
ERISA_PLAN_ASSET_CATEGORY_ID NUMBER
SIDE_LETTER_FLAG CHAR(1)
INCEPTION_DATE DATE
ALLOW_ERISA_FLAG CHAR(1)
ALLOW_PLAN_ASSET_FLAG CHAR(1)
ALLOW_US_TAXABLE_INVESTOR_FLAG CHAR(1)
ALLOW_OFFSHORE_INVESTOR_FLAG CHAR(1)
SUB_DOC_DEADLINE NUMBER
WIRE_DEADLINE NUMBER
DOMICILE_COUNTRY_ID NUMBER
CREATE_USER VARCHAR2(50)
CREATE_DATETIME DATE
LAST_UPDATE_USER VARCHAR2(50)
LAST_UPDATE_DATETIME DATE
PERTRAC_DATA_VENDOR_ID VARCHAR2(255)
PERTRAC_DATA_VENDOR_NAME VARCHAR2(255)
FTS_NAME VARCHAR2(255)
MATLAB_MANAGER_NAME VARCHAR2(255)
ACT_CO_FUND_NAME VARCHAR2(255)
ACT_INVESTMENT_VEHICLE_NAME VARCHAR2(255)
SIDE_POCKET_PCT NUMBER
MAX_ILLIQUID_PCT NUMBER
CONTRIBUTION_OPENING_ID NUMBER
MANAGEMENT_FEE_PCT NUMBER
INCENTIVE_FEE_PCT NUMBER
SIDE_POCKET_NOTE VARCHAR2(4000)
FTS_ID NUMBERI was trying to join the other 3 tables with the main query as below..
select me.manager_entity_id
, me.manager_entity_type_id
, me.manager_entity_parent_id
, me.manager_entity_link_id
, level
from manager_entity me
, manager_roof mr
, manager_product mp
, investment_vehicle iv
where me.manager_entity_link_id= mr.manager_roof_id
and mr.manager_roof_id= mp.manager_roof_id
and mp.manager_product_id= iv.manager_product_id
start with me.manager_entity_id=:p_id
connect by prior me.manager_entity_id=me.manager_entity_parent_idHere manager_entity_link_id of manager_entity table represents(or has) the primary key of all the other 3 table..like
Enter value for p_id: 1
old 7: start with me.manager_entity_id=&p_id
new 7: start with me.manager_entity_id=1
MANAGER_ENTITY_ID MANAGER_ENTITY_TYPE_ID MANAGER_ENTITY_PARENT_ID
MANAGER_ENTITY_LINK_ID LEVEL
1 1008
14793 1
263 1009 1
19695 2
803 1010 263
7031783 3
MANAGER_ENTITY_ID MANAGER_ENTITY_TYPE_ID MANAGER_ENTITY_PARENT_ID
MANAGER_ENTITY_LINK_ID LEVEL
804 1010 263
7031782 3
805 1010 263
7031781 3The above is the output for the hierarchy query
Here the MANAGER_ENTITY_LINK_ID has values (14793, 19695, 7031783 , 7031782 , 7031781)
Where 14793 is the manager_roof_id in manager_roof_table
19695 is the manager_product_id in the manager_product table
7031783 , 7031782 , 7031781 are the investment_vehicle_id’s in the investment_vehicle table…
In the output I need to retrieve manager_roof_name, manager_product_name, investment_vehicle_name..
Thanks in advance
HTH
Edited by: user10280715 on Dec 3, 2008 11:55 AMThe reason result show as no rows selected is your first insert. If fails since column list has 3 columns while values list has 4 values. You probably missed "ORA-00913: too many values" error:
SQL> drop table manager_entity
2 /
Table dropped.
SQL> create table manager_entity(manager_entity_id number,manager_entity_type_id number,manager_entity_parent_id number,manager_entity_link_id number)
2 /
Table created.
SQL> insert into manager_entity(manager_entity_id,manager_entity_type_id,manager_entity_link_id)
2 values(1,1008,null,14793)
3 /
insert into manager_entity(manager_entity_id,manager_entity_type_id,manager_entity_link_id)
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00913: too many values
SQL> insert into manager_entity(manager_entity_id,manager_entity_type_id,manager_entity_parent_id,manager_entity_link_id)
2 values(263, 1009, 1, 19695)
3 /
1 row created.
SQL> insert into manager_entity(manager_entity_id,manager_entity_type_id,manager_entity_parent_id,manager_entity_link_id)
2 values(803, 1010, 263, 7031783)
3 /
1 row created.
SQL> insert into manager_entity(manager_entity_id,manager_entity_type_id,manager_entity_parent_id,manager_entity_link_id)
2 values(804, 1010, 263, 7031782)
3 /
1 row created.
SQL> insert into manager_entity(manager_entity_id,manager_entity_type_id,manager_entity_parent_id,manager_entity_link_id)
2 values(805, 1010, 263, 7031781)
3 /
1 row created.
SQL> drop table manager_roof
2 /
Table dropped.
SQL> create table manager_roof(manager_roof_id number,manager_roof_name varchar2(20))
2 /
Table created.
SQL> insert into manager_roof(manager_roof_id,manager_roof_name)
2 values(14793,'roof')
3 /
1 row created.
SQL> drop table manager_product
2 /
Table dropped.
SQL> create table manager_product(manager_product_id number,manager_product_name varchar2(20),manager_roof_id number)
2 /
Table created.
SQL> Insert into manager_product(manager_product_id,manager_product_name,manager_roof_id)
2 Values(19695,'product1', 14793)
3 /
1 row created.
SQL> drop table investment_vehicle
2 /
Table dropped.
SQL> create table investment_vehicle(investment_vehicle_id number,manager_product_id number,investment_vehicle_name varchar2(20))
2 /
Table created.
SQL> Insert into investment_vehicle(investment_vehicle_id,manager_product_id,investment_vehicle_name)
2 Values(7031781,19695,'inv1')
3 /
1 row created.
SQL> Insert into investment_vehicle(investment_vehicle_id,manager_product_id,investment_vehicle_name)
2 Values(7031782,19695,'inv3')
3 /
1 row created.
SQL> Insert into investment_vehicle(investment_vehicle_id,manager_product_id,investment_vehicle_name)
2 Values(7031783,19695,'inv3')
3 /
1 row created.
SQL> COMMIT
2 /
Commit complete.
SQL>
SQL> select me.manager_entity_id
2 , me.manager_entity_type_id
3 , me.manager_entity_parent_id
4 , me.manager_entity_link_id
5 , level
6 from manager_entity me
7 start with me.manager_entity_id=&p_id
8 connect by prior me.manager_entity_id=me.manager_entity_parent_id
9
SQL> /
Enter value for p_id: 1
old 7: start with me.manager_entity_id=&p_id
new 7: start with me.manager_entity_id=1
no rows selectedAs soon as you fix the error:
SQL> drop table manager_entity
2 /
Table dropped.
SQL> create table manager_entity(manager_entity_id number,manager_entity_type_id number,manager_entity_parent_id number,manager_entity_link_id number)
2 /
Table created.
SQL> insert into manager_entity(manager_entity_id,manager_entity_type_id,manager_entity_parent_id,manager_entity_link_id)
2 values(1,1008,null,14793)
3 /
1 row created.
SQL> insert into manager_entity(manager_entity_id,manager_entity_type_id,manager_entity_parent_id,manager_entity_link_id)
2 values(263, 1009, 1, 19695)
3 /
1 row created.
SQL> insert into manager_entity(manager_entity_id,manager_entity_type_id,manager_entity_parent_id,manager_entity_link_id)
2 values(803, 1010, 263, 7031783)
3 /
1 row created.
SQL> insert into manager_entity(manager_entity_id,manager_entity_type_id,manager_entity_parent_id,manager_entity_link_id)
2 values(804, 1010, 263, 7031782)
3 /
1 row created.
SQL> insert into manager_entity(manager_entity_id,manager_entity_type_id,manager_entity_parent_id,manager_entity_link_id)
2 values(805, 1010, 263, 7031781)
3 /
1 row created.
SQL> drop table manager_roof
2 /
Table dropped.
SQL> create table manager_roof(manager_roof_id number,manager_roof_name varchar2(20))
2 /
Table created.
SQL> insert into manager_roof(manager_roof_id,manager_roof_name)
2 values(14793,'roof')
3 /
1 row created.
SQL> drop table manager_product
2 /
Table dropped.
SQL> create table manager_product(manager_product_id number,manager_product_name varchar2(20),manager_roof_id number)
2 /
Table created.
SQL> Insert into manager_product(manager_product_id,manager_product_name,manager_roof_id)
2 Values(19695,'product1', 14793)
3 /
1 row created.
SQL> drop table investment_vehicle
2 /
Table dropped.
SQL> create table investment_vehicle(investment_vehicle_id number,manager_product_id number,investment_vehicle_name varchar2(20))
2 /
Table created.
SQL> Insert into investment_vehicle(investment_vehicle_id,manager_product_id,investment_vehicle_name)
2 Values(7031781,19695,'inv1')
3 /
1 row created.
SQL> Insert into investment_vehicle(investment_vehicle_id,manager_product_id,investment_vehicle_name)
2 Values(7031782,19695,'inv3')
3 /
1 row created.
SQL> Insert into investment_vehicle(investment_vehicle_id,manager_product_id,investment_vehicle_name)
2 Values(7031783,19695,'inv3')
3 /
1 row created.
SQL> COMMIT
2 /
Commit complete.
SQL>
SQL> select me.manager_entity_id
2 , me.manager_entity_type_id
3 , me.manager_entity_parent_id
4 , me.manager_entity_link_id
5 , level
6 from manager_entity me
7 start with me.manager_entity_id=&p_id
8 connect by prior me.manager_entity_id=me.manager_entity_parent_id
9
SQL> /
Enter value for p_id: 1
old 7: start with me.manager_entity_id=&p_id
new 7: start with me.manager_entity_id=1
MANAGER_ENTITY_ID MANAGER_ENTITY_TYPE_ID MANAGER_ENTITY_PARENT_ID MANAGER_ENTITY_LINK_ID LEVEL
1 1008 14793 1
263 1009 1 19695 2
803 1010 263 7031783 3
804 1010 263 7031782 3
805 1010 263 7031781 3
SQL> SY. -
Tricky query with multiple hierarchial sub queries
Here's a pussle that I cannot solve. Who can help me?
Given table F (records form a binary tree with levels 0, 1, and
2):
Id IdParent
F1 null
F2 F1
F3 F2
F4 F2
F5 F1
F6 F5
F7 F5
and given table D (records form a similar binary tree with
levels 0, 1, and 2):
Id IdParent
D1 null
D2 D1
D3 D2
D4 D2
D5 D1
D6 D5
D7 D5
and given table P (cross referencing tables F and D):
IdF IdD
F2 D6
F3 D2
F5 D7
and given table S (which holds the seed to the query):
IdF
F3
and given table I (just any collection of records that reference
table D which we want to select records from):
Id IdD
I1 D1
I2 D2
I3 D3
I4 D4
I5 D5
I6 D6
I7 D7
I8 D1
I9 D5
all together being related like in figure 1:
S.IdF =>> F.Id
F.Id <- P.IdF
P.IdD -> D.Id
D.Id <<= I.IdD
where =>> denotes 'is or is a descenden of'
and -> denotes 'is'
I want to build a query that lets me select all records from
table I, which reference table D, such that the referenced
records in table D are hierarchial descendents of any record
that is referenced by records in table P, for which they
reference records in table F, which are ancestors to records
referenced by records in table S.
If it wasn't for the hierarchial approach on both sides of the
cross referencing table, matters would have been easy. Then the
releational map would have been like in figure 2:
S.IdF <- P.IdF
P.IdD -> I.IdD
and the query would have been:
SELECT I.Id
FROM I, P, S
WHERE I.IdD = P.IdD
AND P.IdF = S.IdF
So in what I am looking for, you may say that the '='-signs in
this select statement should denote 'is or is a descenden of'
going towards the side of table P.
Given the tables listed above and given the query I am seeking,
I expect to retrieve the following result set:
I.Id
I2
I3
I4
I6
Tricky, eh? I belive the figures are the best angles to
understand this problem.You do this with subqueries and hierarchical queries...
First the hierarchal subquery on F...
SQL> SELECT f.id
2 FROM f
3 CONNECT BY PRIOR f.idp = f.id
4 START WITH f.id IN ( SELECT idf FROM s )
5 ;
ID
F3
F2
F1
Then join with the cross reference table...
SQL> SELECT p.idd
2 FROM p
3 , ( SELECT f.id
4 FROM f
5 START WITH f.id IN ( SELECT idf FROM s )
6 CONNECT BY PRIOR f.idp = f.id
7 ) s
8 WHERE s.id = p.idf
9 ;
ID
D6
D2
Use this as a subquery in a hierarchial query for the
descendents in D...
SQL> SELECT d.id
2 FROM d
3 START WITH d.idd IN ( SELECT p.idd
4 FROM p
5 , ( SELECT f.id
6 FROM f
7 START WITH f.id IN ( SELECT
idf FROM s )
8 CONNECT BY PRIOR f.idp = f.id
9 ) s
10 WHERE s.id = p.idf
11 )
12 CONNECT BY PRIOR d.id = d.idp
13 ;
ID
D2
D3
D4
D6
Then use that as a subquery to return the I result set...
SQL> SELECT i.id
2 FROM i
3 WHERE i.idd IN ( SELECT d.id
4 FROM d
5 START WITH d.id IN ( SELECT p.idd
6 FROM p
7 , ( SELECT
f.id
8 FROM f
9 START
WITH f.id IN ( SELECT idf FROM s )
10 CONNECT
BY PRIOR f.idp = f.id
11 ) s
12 WHERE s.id = p.idf
13 )
14 CONNECT BY PRIOR d.id = d.idp
15 )
16 ;
ID
I2
I3
I4
I6Good Luck... -
Cosider the following record set from the emp table.
empno ename mgr
7839 KING
7566 SCOTT 7839
7566 BLAKE 7839
7782 CLARK 7839
If I use the following hierarchial query to populate a tree in Oracle forms
I will get the result as shown below.
Query
=====
select -1, level, ename, null, ename
from emp
where empno in (7839,7566,7698,7782)
start with ename = 'KING'
connect by mgr = prior empno;
Result
======
KING
JONES
BLAKE
CLARK
Here is my problem. Though diffrent employees can work under a manager,
we have some internal rules that assigns an order to each employee who
works under a manager. This helps us in identifying who should take
charge in the absence of a manager.
I have added one column to the emp table, in order to store the order in
which the employee reports to the manager.
Now the record set becomes
empno ename mgr emp_order
7839 KING 0
7566 SCOTT 7839 1
7566 BLAKE 7839 3
7782 CLARK 7839 2
Now I want the forms tree to be displayed as shown below.
KING
JONES
CLARK
BLAKE
(In short, I want the records in a particular level to be displayed
according to a pre-defined order, rather than getting them displayed
randomly).
Which query can I use for this purpose ?
Please help....
ShibuHi Guys,
Thanks a lot for your suggestions.
It really works great in SQL Plus.
I am familiar with Oracle Forms and I know how to use it if I want to build a tree in Forms.
Here is my requirement. I want to build the application using Oracle Portal. I know that there is something called 'Hierarchy' available in Portal. I don't know up to what extend it gives flexibility in programatically populating the tree.
Here is the scenario. I will use the hierarchial query with CONNECT SIBLINGS BY clause to populate the a tree which will show me employees in a department hierarchially.
Eg:
KING
SCOTT
BLAKE
SMITH
Now I like to show the projects assigned to each employee, which itself can be considered as another hierarchy.
Eg of Projects hierarchy.
Projects
Development
Oracle Applications
HRMS
Support
Intranet Applications
Suppose SCOTT is working in HRMS project, the tree should show as,
KING
SCOTT
Projects
Development
Oracle Applications
HRMS
BLAKE
SMITH
I can color code the node which will distinguish between an employee and his assignments.
Is there a way to achieve it in Oracle Portal using the 'Hierarchy' or what may be the best way to go (Applet etc...) ???
Thanks in advance for your help.
Shibu -
Hi friends,
I need urgent help. I have tried that Position Hierarchy query. If i give Bottom position id and Top position id , it should display that particular root only.
This is my query.
SELECT posname, subordinate_position_id, parent_position_id
FROM (
SELECT SYS_CONNECT_BY_PATH (pse.subordinate_position_id, '/') posname,
pse.subordinate_position_id, parent_position_id
FROM (SELECT NAME, position_id
FROM hr_all_positions_f_tl
WHERE LANGUAGE = USERENV ('LANG')) hap,
(SELECT NAME, position_id
FROM hr_all_positions_f_tl
WHERE LANGUAGE = USERENV ('LANG')) has,
per_pos_structure_elements pse
WHERE pse.business_group_id = 0
AND hap.position_id = pse.parent_position_id
AND has.position_id = pse.subordinate_position_id
START WITH pse.parent_position_id = 63--:parent_posid
CONNECT BY PRIOR pse.subordinate_position_id = pse.parent_position_id
AND PRIOR pse.pos_structure_version_id = pse.pos_structure_version_id
WHERE subordinate_position_id = 362--:subposid
Output coming like this :
Posname SUBORDINATE_POSITION_ID PARENT_POSITION_ID
/81/55/161/135/188/141/101/362 *362 101*
It returns one row only
i need Like this
subordinate positiond_id Parent_position_id
362 101
101 141
141 188
188 135
135 161
161 55
55 81
81 63.
How to achieve this.. Please help.
Thanks in advance.
KaviTry this
SELECT null posname, subordinate_position_id, parent_position_id, level_num
FROM (
SELECT distinct
--SYS_CONNECT_BY_PATH (pse.subordinate_position_id, '/') posname, --uncomment this line if necessary
level level_num,
pse.subordinate_position_id, parent_position_id
FROM (SELECT NAME, position_id
FROM hr_all_positions_f_tl
WHERE LANGUAGE = USERENV ('LANG')) hap,
(SELECT NAME, position_id
FROM hr_all_positions_f_tl
WHERE LANGUAGE = USERENV ('LANG')) has,
per_pos_structure_elements pse
WHERE pse.business_group_id = 0
AND hap.position_id = pse.parent_position_id
AND has.position_id = pse.subordinate_position_id
START WITH pse.parent_position_id = 63--:parent_posid
CONNECT BY PRIOR pse.subordinate_position_id = pse.parent_position_id
AND PRIOR pse.pos_structure_version_id = pse.pos_structure_version_id
WHERE subordinate_position_id = 362--:subposid
order by level_numMake sure that the you are using the correct values for the 3 IDs.
Hope this helps,
Sandeep Gandhi -
Hi All,
I have below tables,
Tables
1 Employees Type (Tells About Employees Designation)
2.Employee Details (Tells Employee Details)
3.Employee Relation (Tells Relationship between Employees)
Hierarchy
ARC (SENIOR MANAGER)
SUN (MANAGER)
MOON (TECH LEAD)
LITE (EMPLOYEE)
RAG (TECH LEAD)
BESH (TECH LEAD)
CHESH (EMPLOYEE)
PRASAD (EMPLOYEE)
1 Employees Type Data
Type No||Type Name
1|Employee
2|Tech Lead
3|Manager
4|Senior Manager
2.Employee Details
Emp No||Emp Name|Employee Type
10|ARC|4
20|SUN|3
30|RAG|2
40|PRASAD|1
50|MOON|2
60|LITE|1
70|CHESH|1
80|BESH|2
3. Employee Relation
Relation Number|Emp No|Prnt_Relation Number
1|10|NULL
2|20|1
3|30|1
4|40|1
5|50|2
6|60|2
7|70|3
8|80|3
These are my tables structure,
Now I want Hierarchial Query for below,
Input will be Relation Number,
if I give relation number as input I want to display all immediate childern that are Tech Leads and Employees only (it should ignore if it is having any Managers in the result set)
Ex: -
Input is relation number from Employee Relation Table,
If I give input as *1*
Output Should be,
Relation Number|Employee_id|Employee Name
3|30|Rag
7|70|Besh
8|80|Chesh
If I give input as *2*
Output Should be,
Relation Number|Employee_id|Employee Name
5|50|MOON
6|60|LITE,
If I give input as *4*
Output Should be,
Relation Number|Employee_id|Employee Name
<NO Rows Returned>
Thanks,Hi,
with emp_type as ( select 1 type_id, 'Employee' emp_type from dual
union
select 2 type_id, 'Tech Lead' emp_type from dual
union
select 3 type_id, 'Manager' emp_type from dual
union
select 4 type_id, 'Senior Manager' emp_type from dual),
emp_details as ( select 10 emp_no, 'ARC' fname, 4 type1 from dual
union
select 20 emp_no, 'SUN' fname, 3 type1 from dual
union
select 30 emp_no, 'RAG' fname, 2 type1 from dual
union
select 40 emp_no, 'PRASAD' fname, 1 type1 from dual
union
select 50 emp_no, 'MOON' fname, 2 type1 from dual
union
select 60 emp_no, 'LITE' fname, 1 type1 from dual
union
select 70 emp_no, 'CHESH' fname, 1 type1 from dual
union
select 80 emp_no, 'BESH' fname, 2 type1 from dual),
Emp_Relation as (
select 1 Relation, 10 emp_no1, null parent_Relation from dual
union
select 2 Relation, 20 emp_no1, 1 parent_Relation from dual
union
select 3 Relation, 30 emp_no1, 1 parent_Relation from dual
union
select 4 Relation, 40 emp_no1, 1 parent_Relation from dual
union
select 5 Relation, 50 emp_no1, 2 parent_Relation from dual
union
select 6 Relation, 60 emp_no1, 2 parent_Relation from dual
union
select 7 Relation, 70 emp_no1, 3 parent_Relation from dual
union
select 8 Relation, 80 emp_no1, 8 parent_Relation from dual)
select type_id, emp_type,
emp_no, fname, relation, parent_relation
from EMP_DETAILS, EMP_TYPE, EMP_RELATION
WHERE TYPE_ID = type1
AND EMP_NO = EMP_NO1
AND LEVEL = 2
CONNECT BY PRIOR RELATION = PARENT_RELATION
START WITH RELATION = :P_RELATION
--START WITH PARENT_RELATION IS NULL -- If want to display the complete heirarchy remove comments for this line and remove "and level = 2" and "START WITH RELATION = :P_RELATION"For p_relation = 1
TYPE_ID EMP_TYPE EMP_NO FNAME RELATION PARENT_RELATION
3 Manager 20 SUN 2 1
2 Tech Lead 30 RAG 3 1
1 Employee 40 PRASAD 4 1
3 rows selected.Not sure how do you get the following and it's not clear on what basis.
If I give input as *1*
Output Should be,
Relation Number|Employee_id|Employee Name
3|30|Rag
7|70|Besh
8|80|CheshFor p_relation = 2
TYPE_ID EMP_TYPE EMP_NO FNAME RELATION PARENT_RELATION
2 Tech Lead 50 MOON 5 2
1 Employee 60 LITE 6 2
2 rows selected.For p_relation = 3
TYPE_ID EMP_TYPE EMP_NO FNAME RELATION PARENT_RELATION
1 Employee 70 CHESH 7 3
1 row selected.For p_relation = 4
no rows selected.Hope this helps
Best Regards
Arif Khadas
Edited by: Arif Khadas on Jun 29, 2010 12:47 PM -
Dynamic columns in query depending on hierarchy nodes
Hello all
I want to design a query with dynamic number of columns depending on hierarchy node.
A hierarchy node is selected while running the query and user has authorization to see all subsequent nodes below the selected node.
e.g. consider grp hierarchy with units and sub-grps as nodes.
level1 Grp1
levele2 unit1 : grp2 : grp3
level3 : unit2 unit4 : unit4 grp4
Suppose user select node Grp1, then there should be 3 columns for unit1, grp2, grp3
If user selects node grp2, then there should be 2 columns for unit2 and unit4
Please help. Any suggestions highly are highly appreciated.
Rgds
SanjyotSurekha,
Try this.
Place heirarchy/characteristic in columns, under this place required keyfigure.
Restrict with variable.
Srini -
The query contains a formula with the operator SUMCT
I m trying to get query ready for Webi, getting the error as 'The query contains a formula with the operator %RT. Therefore, the query cannot be released for OLE DB for OLAP'
I have not used any kind of s %GT, %RT, %CT, SUMGT, SUMRT, SUMCT and LEAF, also i have suppressed results / over results from the query, over to it, i have removed the calculate results as 'summation' feature and set to 'not defined' for all of my key figures.
Still getting the error...
Please suggest.
Nirajhi,
Ensure that all Link IDs are visible in the lsdal.ini file located in the \Windows\system directory of the PAS Server as those are then available to all users. The lsdal.ini file may not be correctly updated if: - You have created the BI Link IDs while using PAS in Client Server Mode - You have enabled multi user access for remote desktop. In this case an additional lsdal.ini file may appear in the user specific Windows directory of someone who may have remotely connected to the system to create the Link ID. That additional lsdal.ini file will only be valid for that specific user.
Also try adding "ODBOSECURITY=0" entry to the end of the c:\windows\lsserver.ini file on the server.
hope it helps
regards
laksh -
Updating DB through resultSet that contains a join query
hy, is there any way to update a database by using ResultSet.updateXXX() when the result set
contains the result of a join qeury ?
guy.firstly thanx for answering.
lets asssume that the query contains Attrbs from more the two tables.
will the updatexxx() update the undelying data base related table ? -
Sort siblings of a hierarchial query in oracle8i
Hi,
I have a basic hierarchial query like the following:
select *
from users_table
start with userid = user
connect by manager = prior userid
I would like to sort the employees by name under their manager. Is there an easy way to do this in Oracle8i. I cannot use the ORDER SIBLINGS BY clause until Oracle9i. Thanks for your help.http://www.quest-pipelines.com/pipelines/plsql/archives.htm#code16
Maybe you are looking for
-
Adobe Air native extension for admob
Dear Adobe Team, We have recently purchased Adobe Air native extension for admob for android & ios but every time we upload our app to an ipad or iphone, the app crashes. We have carefully followed your instructions, and we're sure we've not made a m
-
Problem in Interface determination for multiple MM
Hi experts, i designed an IDOC to Jdbc scenario. The particular thing is that I have TWO message mappings to apply for the same source and same target. Hence, I have in my directory two scenarios with : - same Reveicer Determination - same Interface
-
Ignore some fields while saving a Java class into XML
Hi! I've seen in this forum that there is an easy way of saving Java classes to XML files using Castor. I want to save some Java classes into XML, but not all the fields of the class. For example, I want to ignore all lists. Is there any easy way to
-
I've created an iBook with iBook Author, downloaded it onto my iPad. When looking at my iBooks in list view the title and author are shown but there is no category and I can't figure out from any documentation where you can define the category for th
-
Hello, we decided to theft-protect our workstations by using EFS encryption on some important documents and directories. Just to be sure: I hope that data will not be readable in the case that someone physically gains access to the disk or computer w