Infotype History required in Report

Hi.
We have a requirement to fetch the history of change done in Infotypes(2001,2002,etc), we have stuck with the following fields at where to retrieve.
Requirement Example:
Consider the employee taken a sick leave half day on 25-Apr-14. The entry created in 2001 info-type. After that the Change done as Full Day on 25-Apr-14 for the same employee. In this case, the following change done.
Change done:
Field Name : ENDUZ
Old Value : 14:00
New Value : 18:00
Fields need to be captured:
Info type Field Name
Old Value before change done
New Value after change
Regards
Rajkumar Narsimman

Hello Rajkumar,
The change log will not be captured for data element ENDUZ and will not be updated in CDPOS table.
Please find the screen shot : -
Thanks

Similar Messages

Asset History Sheet giving Report date 31.03.2008 invalid for this report

S_ALR_87011990 :Asset History Sheet.
Report date 31.03.2008 is invalid for this report
In the above report, if we give the Report Data, as any date other than the end month of the fiscal year, it gives the error " Report date 31.03.2008 is invalid for this report" We require this report for tax purpose upto 31st Mar08
What needs to be done ?
Thanks
amit

Hi Amit,
In AM you can only report on the dates you have set-up in period control. In the most cases this is the last day of the Month. When you have 13 periods from 4 weeks you can't report on the calendar month end.
Paul

Stock/requirment list report

Require a report to display the month stock requirment for the next two years based on the plant and mrp.

Hi Raju,
Please check this FM MD_STOCK_REQUIREMENTS_LIST_API.
Hope this will help.
Regards,
Ferry Lianto

Required standard report

Hi,
Please help me in getting the report.
Require a report which should have PO No., Material Code, PO qunatity, GR quantity and payment to supplier with respect to GR.
Thanks...

Go to MB5S for this report
and add the fields which you don't see on the screen from Current display varinat from the header
you will get all this information

Authorization to change BOM with history requirements

Hi Techies,
I m facing an issue now with respect to authorisation of changing BOM with history requirements. Our quality system was a copy from a production server which was used for CRM before. Usually in SAP when we change a BOM with a change number we cant again change it back without a change number.
In our case it is not providing an error but it is providing a warning. Now my requirement is to change this warning message to error message. So that people wont change BOM without a change number.
I tried to enter the transaction SU24 and found the authorizaton C_STUE_NOH with proposal YS. Then i tried to change the filed value to ' ' (NO) and saved it.
But still i m not able to change the warning message to error message.
Is there any other setting i need to carry out for this.
Please help me with this issue.
Thanking you in advance.
Regards,
Kris.S

Dear Krishu,
Below has been mentioned in OSS note: 420878. Check once again you have save as NO. Then go to tcode SU03 Object Class PP/ C_STUE_ROH
Summary
Symptom
In Customizing of the BOM, the history requirement is set or a BOM requires a history. Despite this, it is possible to process BOMS without engineering change management. The system only processes a warning message (29 045) which can be skipped.
Additional key words
CS02, change number, OS27, W045(29)
Cause and prerequisites
Authorization profile
Solution
Check the authorization profile of the respective user.
Example:
         C_STUE_NOH <OBJ>
            &_SAP_ALL    <AUT>
                NOHIS      <FLD>
would have the authorization to process BOMs requiring history without a change number. In this case, if you change '*' to ' ' in NOHIS, you will no longer receive a warning, but rather an error message.
Regards / US

BOM change with history requirement

hello,
requirement: CS02 must input Change Number
configuration:OS25: BOM Usage-BOM status -history requirement flag selected
issue: CS02 change BOM, only warning message: Enter change number -BOM has history requirement
how to meet my demand? any other configuration?
pls give me some help, thanks
best regards
lee

Hello check this SPRO settings ;
Engineering Change Management Setup
This are the basic IMG settings in order to used the engineering change management
features.
x refers to a tick.
First setup the control data in OS54.
Revision sections
Fields :-
Revision level active            x
Ext. revision level              x
Higher revision level            x
Object Management Record sections
Fields :-
Object maintenance               x
Assign alternative date          x
Overide value/assignment date sections
Fields :-
Only with leading change mst.    x
Setting the Revision level active is to activate the engineering change management for
material master. If you do not want the engineering change management for materials,
remove the tick.
With a tick in "Higher revision level", the new revision level has to be always higher
than the old revision.
Secondly, setup the external number range in OS53.
If you use the internal number range, then remove the external number range.
Third, define the status for the change master records in transaction SM30 - V_T419S.
Change No.     Chg        Date Chg     Dist. Lock      Description
Status         Poss
1             x            x             ' '         Active
2            ' '          ' '            ' '         Inactive
3            ' '          ' '             x          Locked
Fourth, define modification parameters for the BOM in OS27.
Fields :-
BOM Validty Maint.               x
EC Management Active             x
History Requirement             ' '
Unit Piece                      PC
The rest of the fields are blank.
If the History Requirement is tick, every time during creation of the BOM, SAP will
prompt your for an ECN number as is compulsory.
Lastly, define fields selection for routing in OP5A.
PP task lists: initial screen -> Change number -> Transaction code -> Tick Req.
Setting the Transaction code fields Required indicate that you have make the ECN number
compulsory when changing the routing.
Finally, do a test by making changes to the Material Master, BOM and Routing.
Regards,
jaya Vimal

Authorization to change BOM without history requirements

Hi Techies,
We are checking the design and validation of few scenarios in the testing server. During the testing we found that we are able to change the BOM which we have already changed with Change number without change number. Instead of an error message we are only getting a warning message stating the BOM has history requirements.
I found that we could do that only if we had the authorisation C_STUE_NOH assigned to the user profile.
I checked the transaction SU24 and for the transaction CS02 i found the authorisation C_STUE_NOH assigned and the authorisation proposal was YS.
I m a functional consultant and hence i m not able to come to a conclusion on this to know if this the reason which is allowing us to change the BOM without history and just providing an warning message instead of error message.
Thanking you in advance.
Kris.S

Dear Krishu,
Below has been mentioned in OSS note: 420878. Check once again you have save as NO. Then go to tcode SU03 Object Class PP/ C_STUE_ROH
Summary
Symptom
In Customizing of the BOM, the history requirement is set or a BOM requires a history. Despite this, it is possible to process BOMS without engineering change management. The system only processes a warning message (29 045) which can be skipped.
Additional key words
CS02, change number, OS27, W045(29)
Cause and prerequisites
Authorization profile
Solution
Check the authorization profile of the respective user.
Example:
         C_STUE_NOH <OBJ>
            &_SAP_ALL    <AUT>
                NOHIS      <FLD>
would have the authorization to process BOMs requiring history without a change number. In this case, if you change '*' to ' ' in NOHIS, you will no longer receive a warning, but rather an error message.
Regards / US

Is separate licensing required for Report Builder 3.0 ?

Is separate licensing required for Report Builder 3.0 ?

No report Builder 3.0 is just the client side light-weight component to work with published reports & does not need any specific license however the server over which the reports are published (Eventually) must be appropriately licensed
Good Luck! Please Mark This As Answer if it solved your issue. Please Vote This As Helpful if it helps to solve your issue

Source Control 3.1 : History and change reports

Robo Source Control 3.1 : History and change reports are allways empty. I only see titles on the file report.htm (using IE9 or Google Chrome).

What I was saying in your other post was not necessarily that it will work differently on a 64 bit machine, simply that there were known issues with a 64 bit machine that are referenced in
http://blogs.adobe.com/techcomm/2011/12/robohelp-9-0-2-is-now-available.html
It may be the fix referred to there is simply to make it work the same way as on a 32 bit machine and clearly that is giving you grief. Only way way to find out.
See www.grainge.org for RoboHelp and Authoring tips
@petergrainge

ECM - History Requirement for BOM status not activated

Hello,
He have an issue with the warning message displayed when we are trying to modificate an BOM (transaction CS02).
In OS25 transaction we defined that only BOMs with "usage = 1" and "status = 3" have history requirement.
The parameters of OS27 transaction are OK too.
The problem is that the warning message 045 is displayed when we execute CS02 for every kind of BOM usage and status.
We must substitute the warning message by an error message. To do that, we must disable the field NOHIS in C_STUE_NOH object, in the user profile. But, when we do that, the error message is displayed to all kind of BOMs status, blocking the process (following the warning message, which is displayed to all kind of BOM status)
This is an issue of SAP_APPL 470 system.
We tested the similar procedure in an SAP_APPL 603 system, and the results were OK, in other words, the warning message is only displayed for the BOM usage and BOM status defined in OS25 transaction.
Thank's in advance

When the BOM with usage 1 and status 3, by example, is changed with a modification number (following OS25 parameters), the field STZU-HISTK is activated.
Then, if the status of the BOM is changed to 2, the modification number is required, because the STZU-HISTK is activated.
In OS25 transaction only the BOm usage = 1 and BOM status = 3 has the history requirement flag, but after the modification with the mod. number, all the status of the BOM now has the modification number requirement.
How can I allow the modification of the BOM without modification number (other status not flagged in OS25), if this BOM hal already been changed with an modification number (by the status flagged in OS25)?
Thank's in advance

IE versions PC - Windows XP required to Report a Problem

IE versions PC - Windows XP required to Report a Problem

Could you explain the problem you're having in some more detail, please? (As things stand, I don't understand what might be going on.)

History of launched reports

Hi,
is there a table, a view or other way to obtain the history of launched reports in Discoverer?

Hi,
I can't find any object whith this name:
SQL> select * from dba_objects where OBJECT_NAME='QPP_STATISTICS';
no rows selected
This is the list of EUL4_US tables:
SQL> r
1* select OBJECT_NAME, OBJECT_TYPE from dba_objects where OWNER='EUL4_US' and OBJECT_TYPE in ('TABLE', 'VIEW') order by 1
OBJECT_NAME OBJECT_TYPE
EUL4_ACCESS_PRIVS TABLE
EUL4_APP_PARAMS TABLE
EUL4_ASMP_CONS TABLE
EUL4_ASMP_LOGS TABLE
EUL4_ASM_POLICIES TABLE
EUL4_BAS TABLE
EUL4_BATCH_PARAMS TABLE
EUL4_BATCH_QUERIES TABLE
EUL4_BATCH_REPORTS TABLE
EUL4_BATCH_SHEETS TABLE
EUL4_BA_OBJ_LINKS TABLE
EUL4_BQ_DEPS TABLE
EUL4_BQ_TABLES TABLE
EUL4_BR_RUNS TABLE
EUL4_DBH_NODES TABLE
EUL4_DOCUMENTS TABLE
EUL4_DOMAINS TABLE
EUL4_ELEM_XREFS TABLE
EUL4_EUL_USERS TABLE
EUL4_EXPRESSIONS TABLE
EUL4_EXP_DEPS TABLE
EUL4_FREQ_UNITS TABLE
EUL4_FUNCTIONS TABLE
EUL4_FUN_ARGUMENTS TABLE
EUL4_FUN_CTGS TABLE
EUL4_FUN_FC_LINKS TABLE
EUL4_GATEWAYS TABLE
EUL4_HIERARCHIES TABLE
EUL4_HI_NODES TABLE
EUL4_HI_SEGMENTS TABLE
EUL4_IG_EXP_LINKS TABLE
EUL4_IHS_FK_LINKS TABLE
EUL4_KEY_CONS TABLE
EUL4_NAMED_ELEMS VIEW
EUL4_OBJS TABLE
EUL4_OBJ_DEPS TABLE
EUL4_OBJ_JOIN_USGS TABLE
EUL4_ODBC_CATALOGS VIEW
EUL4_ODBC_SCHEMAS VIEW
EUL4_PLAN_TABLE TABLE
EUL4_QPP_STATS TABLE
EUL4_SEGMENTS TABLE
EUL4_SEQUENCES TABLE
EUL4_SQ_CRRLTNS TABLE
EUL4_SUB_QUERIES TABLE
EUL4_SUMMARY_OBJS TABLE
EUL4_SUMO_EXP_USGS TABLE
EUL4_SUM_BITMAPS TABLE
EUL4_SUM_RFSH_SETS TABLE
EUL4_VERSIONS TABLE
50 rows selected.
I can't find any log in ias...
other ideas?

Give me some scnearios or require in reporting .. i want to learn reporting

Hi friends ,
Iam new to reporting.. infact learning.
give me some scnearios or requirements in reporting.. i will work on them and let you know the output.
Pavan
my mail id is [email protected]

Hi ,
Closing this thread

Calling infotype 0002 in ALV report for showing employee photo

Hi all,
The requirment from business side is a report in which employees personal data shuold be shown with employee photo, I had tried for employee photo in ALV report but it didnt sucessed, then I went for other solution like calling transaction in ALV report.
In this case I am calling Infotype 0002 but the issue is that the transaction PA20 is coming with PERNR but I am not able to go directlly to infotype which shows employee Photo,please suggest any solution.
Thaks.
JAY

Hi Jay,
It is possible. Please refer the syntax for the CALL TRANSACTION
CALL TRANSACTION ta { [AND SKIP FIRST SCREEN]
                    | [USING bdc_tab [bdc_options]] }.
You can do a recording till the required page comes & call the transaction accordingly. Hope, you are aware about the same.
For example, I just had a solution to go to the roles tab in the user profile and I did as below:
    CLEAR wa_bdcdata.
    wa_bdcdata-program = 'SAPLSUU5'.
    wa_bdcdata-dynpro   = '0050'.
    wa_bdcdata-dynbegin = k_ok.
    APPEND wa_bdcdata TO it_bdcdata.
    CLEAR wa_bdcdata.
    wa_bdcdata-fnam = 'BDC_CURSOR'.
    wa_bdcdata-fval   = 'USR02-BNAME'.
    APPEND wa_bdcdata TO it_bdcdata.
    CLEAR wa_bdcdata.
    wa_bdcdata-fnam = 'USR02-BNAME'.
    wa_bdcdata-fval   = g_value.
    APPEND wa_bdcdata TO it_bdcdata.
    CLEAR wa_bdcdata.
    wa_bdcdata-fnam = 'BDC_OKCODE'.
    wa_bdcdata-fval   = 'SHOW'.
    APPEND wa_bdcdata TO it_bdcdata.
    CLEAR wa_bdcdata.
    wa_bdcdata-program = 'SAPLSUU5'.
    wa_bdcdata-dynpro   = '0100'.
    wa_bdcdata-dynbegin = k_ok.
    APPEND wa_bdcdata TO it_bdcdata.
    CLEAR wa_bdcdata.
    wa_bdcdata-fnam = 'BDC_OKCODE'.
    wa_bdcdata-fval   = '=ACTG'.
    APPEND wa_bdcdata TO it_bdcdata.
    g_opt-dismode = 'E'.
    g_opt-defsize = k_ok.
*** if user click on the User Name, call SU01
    CALL TRANSACTION 'SU01' USING it_bdcdata
                OPTIONS FROM g_opt.
Regards,
Selva K.

Business Content for "payment history and ageing report"

Hi,
We have AP and AR modules implemented in R/3. And recently the client is implementing Collections Management module in R/3. There is a requirement which has come in which we need to provide the a report by customer the past payments made for the last 6 months and the recievables ageing for 1-30 days, more than 30 days and 90 days. A sample is:
Division                 Past-due payment history                                            Receivables Ageing
Customer         CM-5 CM-4 CM-3 CM-2 CM-1 CM                               1-30days   >30 days 90 days
A                     04/10 05/10 06/10 07/10 08/10 09/10                            150          200       300
etc, where CM = Current Month
After going through the requirement we have found that data for this requirement can be taken from AR module itself as Collections Management data is not being used. In this scenario, if I want to develop a payment history and recievables aging report in BW from AR module, which data sources can be used. I am new the finanace module so if any links to good stuff is greatly appreciated.
Thanks and Regards
Vijay

0FI_AR_4 datasource is the BSID/BSAD line items from R3 and the standard DSOs and Content will give you the ability to do aged debtor reports
You will have to create your own aged debtor reports in WB as the std ones are pants.
You create an aging bucket for each aging based on the following example criteria..
CKF 0-30 days = RKF 0-30 Days Open + RKF 0-30 Days subsequently cleared
(ie you are tryign to restate the ledger to a point in time)
RKF 0-30 Open is..
   posting date <= key date
   item status = 0
   net due date on a constant selection of 0 and -30
RKF 0-30 Subsequently cleared is..
   cleared date > key date
   posting date <- key date
   net due date on a constant selection of 0 and -30
For payment History - I wouldn;t bother with the standard KNB5 extractor (although you can have a look at ti) _ I find it a bit too high a level
I would create a realised payment terms report which looks at the following calculations:
cleared date - net due date (realised payment terms)
net due date - doc date (offered payment terms)
And then create a query for all item status = C transactions which aren't payments (ie not equal to doc type DZ) and show the above calculations weighted per Customer Payment Term
Many ways to skin a cat - the two above will help you on your way
and

Infotype History required in Report

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for