Inhouse repair inbound delivery

Hi CRM luvers,
After i create inhouse repair with item category RSUB, the sales order is getting created correctly in ECC with that item category.
But what are the different ways to create inbound delivery.
Is inbound delivery can be created with out PR and PO because as it is rteurn for repair, am not purchasing it from customer/vendor
Please provide me the details
Thanks,
Priya

please consider the follwoing link for ur reference
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm40/helpdata/en/f0/0f10cbfca6d349b773f77f0967195b/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2004/helpdata/en/35/2a924dc1035cd5e10000009b38f974/content.htm

Similar Messages

Inbound delivery creation through VL01N

Hello,
I wud like to create inbound(return) delivery through VL01N t-code with reference of sales/repair order.
following things i am passing to VL01N screen:
1. Shipping point
2.delivery date = current date
3.repair / sales order number
4.delivery type
suggest me any FM / BAPI
Edited by: anilpat1 on Apr 7, 2009 8:39 AM

Hi,
Did you mean VL31N for Inbound delivery as VL31N is the transaction for Inbound delivery not VL01N.
Try this function module below if it is a collective processing.
function module GN_DELIVERY_CREATE.
let me know if it worked.
R,
Srini

Return(inbound delivery) creation through VL01N

Hello,
I wud like to create Return(Inbound) delivery through VL01N transaction. Following is the process i' m following.
1. create notification through IW51
2. create repair order through IW52
3.create return delivery ( automatically) through VL01N with reference to repair order created in step no.2.
I have searched for Function module & BAPI, but it seems there are no FM & BAPI's for such requirement.
Can any one suggest me the Functional solution for above problem.
Thanks,
Anil

Normally from the Notifications, We create a Return Order ( Document Type RE) automatically. We need to the necessary configurations.
We can create the Return Delivery from VL01n. when you mention the return sales orde there the system automatically pulls the return Delivery type LR from the configuration of the sales document type RE.
otherwise you have to mention explicitly the document type = LR in the selection screen of Vl01n.
You Can use the same BAPI or FM ( the one used to create the Outbound Delivery ) and mention the document type as LR.

Inhouse repair Integration

Hi
I;m trying to use CRM Service with ERP without Controlling, I set the option No Controlling inteh Controlling Scenario config, but i don't found any documentation about limititations or not.
I can do the Return and delivery equipment process in ERP but i have problem in teh rest of the process of Material reservation or in Service confirmation when i try to bill Services or material with a debit request doc in ero.
I;m using CRM 7.0 and ECC 6.0
Any info, recomemdation, experience,
Best Regards

I found that there is definition in action profile:
Repair Request(Action Profile): Processing Details
ordered_pro = SRV_diagnosis.
how can we know that product is srv_diagnosis. What settings has to be made on product master to make it srv_diagnosis.
2nd question) i have removed that condition and the previous error message is gone and getting action performed immediatly but am not able to see item with item category DGNS in my inhouse repair order.
Thanks,
Priya

Creation of inbound delivery without reference to a PO

Dear gurus,
Let's say that a normal inbound flow is something like this:
PO > Create inbound delivery with reference to PO > inbound shipment > Transfer Order > Confirm Transfer Order > Post Goods Receipt > Putaway
Issue:
My client does not want to create the PO because the PO serves no purpose to them. They want the process to start from inbound delivery.
Question:
1. Can a standalone inbound delivery be created WITHOUT reference to a PO ? If yes, please tell me the configuration and transaction code involved in order to create this standalone inbound delivery.
2. Based on standard configuration, can an inbound delivery be created automatically with reference to a material document (for eg MIGO Mvt Type 501). Once again, for this scenario, no PO should be involved. If yes, please tell me the configuration and transaction code involved in order to trigger the creation of this inbound delivery (I'm not looking for the answer of an inbound delivery creation BAPI to being triggered directly after the creation of the Material Document).
3. Based on standard configuration, can an inbound delivery be created manually with reference to a material document (for eg MIGO Mvt Type 501). Once again, for this scenario, no PO should be involved. If yes, please tell me the configuration and transaction code involved in order to create this inbound delivery.
Thanks.

Hi Peter,
Actually, my intention is not really to create an inbound delivery based on a goods receipt. Since my client is not keen on the idea of creating a PO, I'm actually trying to provide alternatives and workarounds. From what I have gathered, I already know this much
-> An inbound delivery must be created with reference to PO unless Handling Unit Management is activated. If Handling Unit Management is activated, the creation of a Material Document will trigger the creation of an inbound delivery (I havent tested this out yet). Therefore, a PO will not be necessary in this case.
I was kind of expecting answers along this line, unless of course, something better pops up. Maybe someone out there may know something more.
As for Handling Units, I'm not familiar with it. Hopefully somebody can give me a good configuration guideline on what to do in order to activate it so that I can simulate the scenario of a Material Document triggering the creation of an inbound delivery (I'm not looking for the kind of answers which simply cuts and pastes the SAP HELP URL, 4.6C Handling Unit PDF, Best Practice Document and etc). Hopefully somebody out there can really give me a good guideline on how to do this.
Thanks..

Creation of Inbound delivery mandatory for ASN process in classic scenario?

Dear Experts,
We are going for classic scenario for our green field SRM implementation process. Our client is not using ASN process in their existing MM process. However, they are now looking for an oppurtunity to enable Suppliers to trigger ASN using SUS. In such case, is creation of inbound delivery from Buyer side a mandatory process?
Is the below the process correct?
PO -> ASN (Supplier using SUS) -> Inbound delivery (Optional) -> Goods Receipt (Mandatory) -> Invoicing.
Here, I understand that Goods receipt can be verified against the PO or via Inbound delivery to PO. ASN will inform the store keeper in advance about impending goods receipt and smoothen the confirmation process.
Could you please comment on the above process? Could you please suggest the best practices followed here?
Thanks and regards,
Ranjan
Ranjan Sutradhar

Hey Ranjan!,
You are on track.
The process flow you have shown is true. ASN is available as a standard as part of the MM-SUS process. It makes the buyer aware of any delays in delivery or to make arrangements on shipping docks to receive goods on a said date etc.
Regards,
Nikhil

ASN creation based on ECC inbound delivery

Hi All,
I have a scenario in which we are creating an inbound delivery in ECC and corresponding ASN should be created in supplier system.
In order to achieve this functionality of ECC to supplier system is there any way to map this functionality through any custom development ?
Kindly suggest
Thanks
Gaurav Gupta

Hi,
What I understand from the requirement is - The Supplier dispatches the material to Purchasing company & informs about the same via ASN. This ASN triggers inbound delivery in ECC. When the material reaches the Purchasing Company, GRN is posted with reference to the Inbound Delivery.
Is this correct?
If so, you can achieve this through RFC function, which can be called from vendor ERP system or through Vendor Portal by directly calling the RFC or by using Web Service.
Regards,
Prashant

Error in creation of inbound delivery

hi
When I tried to create inbound delivery against schedule agreement
1) Following warning message is coming when I enter the quantity for each and every line item
u201CAcknowledgment for PO item contains data varianceu201D
2)Following error message is coming when I saved the delivery
u201CTermination during purchase order updateu201D
So I am unable to create the inbound delivery
Note: this error is coming for a particular vendor only

Hi ,
Goto SM13 .
Find the terminations based on user and creation date.
Get the same analysed by ur ABAP team.
Also check the confirmations in PO at Item level.
Regards
Ramesh Ch

Inbound Delivery: Inbound WHSCON IDoc with Batch Split - HowTo...?

Hello
We have another tricky problem to solve on our ERP 6.0 system.
My colleagues of Lindt UK create manually inbound deliveries (VL33N) which are replicated to the warehouse (DESADV IDoc -> TRADACOMS.ORDHDR).
When the goods arrive at the warehouse they send back a good receipts message (TRADACOMS.DLCHDR -> WHSCON IDoc).
In some cases we have a batch split because the goods have been put into different storage locations. Example:
- item 10: 200 Cases of product 4711, batch 10-2011, in storage location '0001' (free available for Sale)
- item 10:     5 Cases of product 4711, batch 10-2011, in storage location '0004' (damaged)
I am aware that in the inbound WHSCON item 10 is a main position and the two actual batch split positions are sub-items (900001 & 900002 with HIPOS = '10'). I tried to used E1EDL19-QUALF = 'BAS' (= batch split) with the sub-items but failed so far to update the inbound delivery that I can see the batch split.
I have managed to get one sub-item but not 2 of them. Somehow the system aggregates the quantities for both sub-items into the single item that shows up in the inbound delivery.
When we send the inbound delivery to the warehouse the item looks like this:
- item 10: 200 Cases (no batch yet, Putaway quantity = 0, because these data are coming from the warehouse).
QUESTION: Has anybody else been faced with a similar (if not identical) problem and how did you solve it?
Thanks a lot in advance for your valuable input.
Regards
Uwe

Hello Finbarr
I assume that you do NOT send any (suggested) batches to your warehouse. Otherwise you would have the same problem like we have that the WHSCON cannot overwrite a (suggested) batch.
However, if you just send the quantity per item then the batch split is much simpler than you suggested:
"First E1EDL24 segment:
POSNR     50
MATNR     000000000000602006
MATWA     000000000000602006
CHARG     L1519   " <<< first batch
LFIMG     37.000
VRKME     CT
"Second E1EDL24 segment:
POSNR     50
MATNR     000000000000602006
MATWA     000000000000602006
CHARG     L1880   " <<< second batch
LFIMG     37.000
VRKME     CT
Well, and as qualifier we use: E1EDL19-QUALF = 'XYZ' " a dummy
The SAP system is smart enough the realize that these two E1EDL24 segment belong to the same item yet have different batches and, therefore, yield a batch split in the delivery. The system generated the 9xxxxx numbers for this sub-item lines automatically.
Although I believe that it is not possible to change a batch in the delivery using an inbound WHSCON I would appreciate to have a final proof of this assumption. I could imagine that if you first delete the item containing the suggested batch and then add a new item with the actual batch from the warehouse it might works. However, this would require to implement a user-exit which I do not prefer.
Regards
Uwe
PS: It seems I gave an answer to the wrong question (should be EDI (DESADV): Can batches be overwritten by an inbound WHSCON (pick conf)? )

Reg: How to capture the Excise Invoice with respect to Inbound delivery

Hi All,
Please give the process follow for capturing the excise invoice with respect to inbound delivery.
Thanks & Regards
Siva

Hi Siva,
Please check this link
CIN with Example..?
Regards,
Bijoy Kumar

SAP System inconsistency for Inbound delivery / MIGO and a "sap note"

Hello Friends ,
After following SAP instruction on how to remove the inconsistency between posting GR through MIGO (Inv. mang.) and the reflection of the goods movement status in the inbound delivery document - done that using sap note 570991
the problem is that the system start behaving in a weird way throwing unjustified Error messages for any suggested goods receipt using MIGO with reference to inbound
for example after creating an inbound delivery document and trying to post it via migo , an error will pop up
- Inbound delivery storage location cannot be changed to here Message no. VLA316
the thing is i didn't even maintain any storage location entry up to that point and yet i cannot post any stock !!
also another error like
- Inbound delivery batch cannot be changed to *** here
which doesn't make any sense because there is not batches in the inbound document !!
i think this behavior is coming from the "Document Flow Update for Stock Postings" inbound indicator at the shipping parameter at client level customization
i need help on how to overcome this annoying SAP Bug/Problem specially i am in a post go live critical situation

Hi,
The messages you mentioned were introduced to avoid inconsistency between inbound delivery and IM, through the note: 1050944 - GR for inbound delivery using inventory mgmt as of ECC 6.00
If the messages are issued incorrectly, then you may check for SAP notes (I couldnt find anything relevant) or raise an OSS ticket to SAP.
Regards,
AKPT

Problem with HU during creation of Inbound Delivery using IDoc

Hi,
When I am creating Delivery manually and perform Packing, Handling Unit information is stored in VEKP and VEPO tables.
But when I am processing through IDoc, after passing data to Handling Unit Segments E1EDL37 (Handling unit header), E1EDL39 (Control Segment for Handling Units), E1EDL44 (IDoc: Handling Unit Item - Delivery), It is creating delivery successfully but Handling Unit information is not getting stored in VEKP, VEPO tables.
Tried most of the notes 912470, 678464, 682506 and all of them say "<i>You use the Idoc DESADV to create inbound delivery with packing data. The delivery is created, Idoc gets status 52 but the Handling Units (HUs) are missing. This is due to a program error. In case the IDoc contains segments to create HUs (E1EDL37), the IDoc processing should end in error status (51) as long as no packing data could be created</i>.".
Need your advice whether we have to maintain any customizing for this or how to proceed with it.
Thanks in advance,
Murali.

IDocs and BAPIs sometimes behave differently than transactions. You might need to add a user exit specifically for IDoc processing. Otherwise send a message to SAP and have them look at it.

Purchase order and Inbound delivery

Hi gurus,
Im trying to create an inbound delivery with reference to purchase order. In the configuration i've created a new delivery type similar to EL and said Yes to all the copy controls that system asks. When im creating the inbound delivery with reference to the PO it is picking up the standard EL delivery type instead of the one that i created. What did i miss here? I want the inbound delivery type that i created be the default inbound delivery type for that particular order type.. pls suggest
cheers
Joseph

Hi Joseph,
Just check whether the newly created delivery type is assigned to the Confirmation Category LA under the below path:
SproMaterials ManagementPurchasingConfirmationsDefine Internal Confirmation Categories
Regards
Ramesh Ch

PO qty and Value with Inbound Delivery qty

Dear all
i have a report requirement, client wants to have a report on the basis of Inbound delivery qty. for eg.
If Po qty is 100 @ $10.00 each Total Po value = $1000
if he makes a inbound delivery of 20 qty Report should display outstanding delivery qty as 80 and with reduced value .of $800
Pl tell me how to get these details.
Regards
Manoj

Hi Manoj,
I think you should should copy ME2M and change the output.
Sanjeev

Exit or Badi to prevent MIGO Goods Receipt on PO with Inbound Delivery

Hi,
I am hoping that someone can provide me with some direction on how to prevent the use of MIGO for GR when the PO being received is (or should be) linked to an inbound delivery.
For purchase orders with a confirmation control key an inbound delivery is to be created and the goods receipt needs to be done from the inbound delivery. This scenario also includes the case of stock transport orders whereby an inbound delivery is created form the outbound delivery. On the other hand for purchase orders without a confirmation control key no inbound delivery is created and the MIGO transaction is to be used to post the goods receipt.
Since both processes are possible, I would like to prevent people from posting the GR using MIGO if certain conditions pre-exist.
Can anyone suggest a means to accomplish this goal? Is there an exit or badi in MIGO that you would suggest using?
Thanks,
Paul

Hi,
The following user eixts and badis available for migo transaction:
Enhancement/ Business Add-in            Description
Enhancement
MB_CF001
Customer Function Exit in the Case of Updating a Art. Doc.
MBCF0011
Read from RESB and RKPF for print list in MB26
MBCF0010
Customer exit: Create reservation BAPI_RESERVATION_CREATE1
MBCF0009
Filling the storage location field
MBCF0007
Customer function exit: Updating a reservation
MBCF0006
Customer function for WBS element
MBCF0005
Article document item for goods receipt/issue slip
MBCF0002
Customer function exit: Segment text in article doc. item
Business Add-in
MB_RESERVATION_BADI
MB21/MB22: Check and Complete Dialog Data
MB_QUAN_CHECK_BADI
BAdI: Item Data at Time of Quantity Check
MB_PHYSINV_INTERNAL
Connection: Core Inventory and Retail AddOn
MB_MIGO_ITEM_BADI
BAdI in MIGO for Changing Item Data
MB_MIGO_BADI
BAdI in MIGO for External Detail Subscreens
MB_DOC_BADI_INTERNAL
BAdIs when Creating an Article Document (SAP Internal)
MB_DOCUMENT_UPDATE
BADI when updating article document: MSEG and MKPF
MB_DOCUMENT_BADI
BAdIs when Creating an Article Document
MB_CIN_MM07MFB7_QTY
Proposal of quantity from Excise invoice in GR
MB_CIN_MM07MFB7
BAdI for India Version exit in include MM07MFB7
MB_CIN_LMBMBU04
posting of gr
MB_CHECK_LINE_BADI
BAdI: Check Line Before Copying to the Blocking Tables
ARC_MM_MATBEL_WRITE
Check Add-On-Specific Data for MM_MATBEL
ARC_MM_MATBEL_CHECK
Check Add-On-Specific Criteria for MM_MATBEL
If it is helpful rewards points
Regards
Pratap.M

Inhouse repair inbound delivery

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for