INIT for inventory

Dear All,
I have a problem. Basis has applied patch and then restore source system in BI.
But now all init request has been deleted automatically.
when i was trying to run Process chain for inventory i got message " No init for delta"
For master data i can do re-init but when what to do for inventory , purchase etc..
I ran init again for 2lis_03_BF and then delta there are 0 records and it is not possible to get 0 records in inventory .. I think there is some problem.
I should do re-init for inventory or not. ???
Please advise,
Regards
Shweta

Hi Surender,
There is no problem with previous data...actually in rsa7 there is no queue thats why msg is coming no active initialization..
Data is not present for last 3 days..my question is if i will run init now then delta queue will be constructed in rsa7 but how data will come in rsa7 ????
I have dont init and now i can see queue for UM and BF but with 0 data...'
what to do now.. i can manually run collective run now but wat abt tomorrow...
Regards
Shweta

Similar Messages

Records is not coming in Delta for Inventory Cubes.

Hi..All
We are working on BW3.5 SP11 since 01.07.2005.
We are facing a very serious problem in Inventory management data extraction from R/3 since 24.08.2005.
Our active data sources of Inventory Mangement are as follow.
     2LIS_03_BF
     2LIS_03_BX
     2LIS_03_UM
We were regularly getting records through delta as per given schedule after intialisation on 01.07.2005 to till 23.08.2005.
On 24.08.2005 -- Delta schedule we had find out there are some records that were created in R/3 did not come in BW.
On 24.08.2005 -- records loaded in PSA was 20550. The same is appering in RSA3(EXTRACTORS) also.
The Last material document loaded was 4900154552 date 23.08.2005 time 16:56:05 of R/3, but there are many other material documents that were created on the same day but are missing in the extraction.
On 25.08.2005 delta schedule records are getting 0 (Zero). Not a single record is getting in RSA3 (Extractor).
on 26.08.2005 situation is still as it is. No record is coming.
Where as our average records per day is approx. 20000 nos.
The update mode for inventory is Unserialised V3 update, and the update program in R/3 is running perfectly fine as per schdule with no errors.
We could not understand why suddenly stop the extraction of records FOR INVENTORY MANAGEMENT. Because rest all
data sources like Purchasing,Sales and Distribution,Quality Mangement, and PP is working fine on same date.
We checked the data in extractor checker with giving UPDATE MODE "F"-Transfer all requested data.
Still it is showing 0 (Zero Records) for data sources 2LIS_03_BF,2LIS_03_UM.
The situation is still as it is as of now.
This is very crutial for our business. All inventory reports are showing data which is 3 days old.
Please give your advice on this issue. And how to get the records in PSA from R/3.
Regards,
Navin

Hi Ravindra,
Thanks for giving input. The problem got solved.
There was a problem with QRFC Table. Tcode LBWQ
Status was wait.
Thanks for giving feedback.
Regards,
Navin

Report for Inventory Ageing

Our client wants a report for Inventory Ageing. (we are not using batch management)
Use tried to sell Standard report MC46 but they are not convinced with the results.
The issue is if the material is not consumed for last 399 days but today if some movement is there in that particular material, then the material is not shown as non moving. Actually the material was not at all used for last 399 days.
In mc.5 report there are key figures like last consumption, last good issue etc but the same problem is there with it.
We are trying to develop a customised report.
Please help.
Thanks in advance.

Hi,
The Stock Aging Report displays the description of material that are stocked for n-number of periods at particular inventory locations( may be trading plant or manufacturing Plant). The details, which are displayed, are about the aging period for the selected items.
There are reports and T code are
MC.A ,
MC.9,
MM5B,
MMBE,
MB5M,
MC50 - Dead Stock ,
MC46 - Slow-moving items,
If the above reports not meet your requirement, you should develop your own ABAP program to meet your specific business requirement.
This is define in overall stock on value based, suppose a material is received in Feb-month, same material is received in Jan-2007 , DEC-2007 also.The total value of this inventory is say 90 lakhs, ( 30 lakhs of each month) so system will show inventory aging as below
stock aging less than 30 days, 90 lakhs
stock aging more than 30 days but below 60 days 60 lakhs
stock ageing more than 60 days but below 90 days 30 lakhs
Assuming that no issue taken place if issue is taken place, it will be deducted by default FIFO method.
You may have to develop an ABAP report.
However, look into the path: information system > logistics > inventory managment > material and explore all like MC.9,MC.A,MC.B & MC.C
Regards,
Biju K

How to schedule job V3 unserialised Update job for Inventory

Hi gurus,
How to schedule job V3 unserialised Update job for Inventory management
What are the things need to be configured
Thank you

Hi,
In R/3 go to SBIW > Settings for Application-Specific DataSources (PI) > Logistics > Managing Extract Structures > Logistics Extraction Structures Customizing Cockpit
UIn this Screen you can define delta type, and the jog usign the control job option.
Regards,
Dani

Error while filling set up table for Inventory

Hi,
While filling up setup table for Inventory, 2lis_03_bf, i get an error, Plant F041 doesnot exist. I am trying to fillup the table without any selections. Can anyone please suggest me a solution.
Thanks,
Praveen

Please check the following link:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/f83be790-0201-0010-4fb0-98bd7c01e328
Hope it helps you.

How to capture the change in the update mode (for Inventory) in a transport

Hi all,
I recently changed the update mode for Inventory Controlling from Unserialized V3 Update to Queued delta in R/3 DEV environment. When I was doing the change it did not prompt for a transport request. Now I have to somehow capture this in a transport and move it to R/3 Quality environment. How do I capture this change in a transport.
Thanks in advance,
Ram Kumar.

there are 2 options
1) try changing back and forth and see if it prompts for a request
2) Create a customizing request and add the following entry into the request
Program ID - R3TR; Object type - TABU; Object name - TMCEXUPD
and make the entry ...How ?? Click on the key that you see under the column 'Function'
client/application component.. if client is 100 and application component is 11
then the table entry should be 10011
Assign points if it helps
P.S:if you check the table TMCEXUPD shows you the update mode
Edited by: KK on May 28, 2008 1:52 PM

Non-Cumulative vs. Cumulative KeyFigures for Inventory Cube Implementation?

A non-cumulative is a non-aggregating key figure on the level of one or more objects, which is always displayed in relation to time. Generally speaking, in SAP BI data modeling, there are two options for non-cumulative management. First option is to use non-cumulative management with non-cumulative key figures. Second option is to use non-cumulative management with normal key figures (cumulative key figures). For SAP inventory management, 0IC_C03 is a standard business content cube based upon the option of non-cumulative management with non-Cumulative key figures. Due to specific business requirements (this cube is designed primarily for detailed inventory balance reconciliation, we have to enhance 0IC_C03 to add additional characteristics such as Doc Number, Movement type and so on. The original estimated size of the cube is about 100 million records since we are extracting all history records from ECC (inception to date). We spent a lot of time to debate on if we should use non-cumulative key figures based upon the standard business content of 0IC_C03 cube. We understand that, by using Non-Cumulative key figures, the fact table will be smaller (potentially). But, there are some disadvantages such as following:
(1) We cannot use the InfoCube together with another InfoCube with non-cumulative key figures in a MultiProvider.
(2) The query runtime can be affected by the calculation of the non-cumulative.
(3) The InfoCube cannot logically partition by time characteristics (e.g. fiscal year) which makes it difficult for future archiving.
(4) It is more difficult to maintain non-cumulative InfoCube since we have added more granularity (more characteristics) into the cube.
Thus, we have decided not to use the Cumulative key figures. Instead, we are using cumulative key figures such as Receipt Stock Quantity (0RECTOTSTCK) , Issue Stock Quantity(0ISSTOTSTCK)
, Receipt Valuated Stock Value (0RECVS_VAL) and Issue Valuated Stock Value (0ISSVS_VAL). All of those four key figures are available in the InfoCube and are calculated during the update process. Based upon the study of reporting requirements, those four key figures seems to be sufficient to meet all reporting requirements.
In addition, since we have decided not to use cumulative key figures, we have removed non-cumulative key figures from the 0IC_C03 InfoCube and logically partitioned the cube by fiscal year. Furthermore, those InfoCube are fiscally partitioned by fiscal year/period as well.
To a large extent, we are going away from the standard business content cube, and we have a pretty customized cube here. We'd like to use this opportunity to seek some guidance from SAP BI experts. Specifically, we want to understand what we are losing here by not using non-cumulative key figures as provided by original 0IC_C03 business content cube. Your honest suggestions and comment are greatly appreciated!

Hello Marc,
Thanks for the reply.
I work for Dongxin, and would like to add couple of points to the original question...
Based on the requirements, we decided to add Doc Number and Movement type along few other characteristics into the InfoCube (Custom InfoCube - article movements) as once we added these characteristics the Non Cumulative keyfigures even when the marker was properly set were not handling the stock values (balance) and the movements the right way causing data inconsistency issues.
So, we are just using the Cumulative keyfigures and have decided to do the logical partitioning on fiscal year (as posting period is used to derive the time characteristics and compared to MC.1 makes more sense for comparison between ECC and BI.
Also, I have gone through the How to manual for Inventory and in either case the reporting requirement is Inception to date (not just weekly or monthly snapshot).
We would like to confirm if there would be any long term issues doing so.
To optimize the performance we are planning to create aggregates at plant level.
Couple of other points we took into consideration for using cumulative keyfigures are:
1. Parallel processes possible if non-cumulative keyfigures are not used.
2. Aggregates on fixed Plant possible if non-cumulative keyfigures are not used. (This being as all plants are not active and some of them are not reported).
So, since we are not using the stock keyfigures (non cumulative) is it ok not to use 2LIS_03_BX as this is only to bring in the stock opening balance....
We would like to know if there would be any issue only using BF and UM and using the InfoCube as the one to capture article movements along with cumulative keyfigures.
Once again, thanks for your input on this issue.
Thanks
Dharma.

Stored Procedure for Inventory

Hi Experts,
I want a SP for inventory if i choose filler warehouse and To warehouse then there should be an error if both warehouses are not excisable or both should non-excisable .
In simple i can transfer items only from excisable warehouse to excisable warehouse and non-excisable to non-excisable.
plz help me..
Thanks & Regards
Shiv Sen

Hi shiv,
there is a work around for this.Make one udf at header level and pick the value of filler that is exciseable or not(Y or N),
make one more udf at row level and do same.
now compare both udf values...
********stored procedure************
if @object_type = '67' and @transaction_type in ('A','U')
begin
if exists
( SELECT T0.[DocNum] FROM OWTR T0 INNER JOIN WTR1 T1 ON T0.DocEntry = T1.DocEntry WHERE t0.docnum =@list_of_cols_val_tab_del and T1.[Udf_row] <> T0.[UDF_header])
begin
set @error =1
set @error_message = 'whse not have same property'
end
end
***************Fms for header level UDF**************
SELECT T0.[Excisable] FROM OWHS T0 WHERE T0.[WhsCode] = $[owtr.filler]
******************fms for row level**********************
SELECT T0.[Excisable] FROM OWHS T0 WHERE T0.[WhsCode] = $[wtr1.whscode]
hope it will solve ur problem

Process order settlements not flowing into BI for Inventory

Hi,
I built a cube for inventory based on the standard extractors to generate MAC values. I have three MAC reports, each for daily, weekly and monthly. The reports give the right values at the at the month level , but whenever there is a settlement for process order done, BI does not pick the settlement value and this makes the MAC value shoot up at the daily and weekly level. I tried to a find an extractor for this settlement and could not find any. Can someone please help me with this ? Is there any datasource for settlement of process order?
Thanks

Hi,
Both Tomas and Debraj have provided good tips. Let me elaborate on this.
From SWU3, access Maintain Runtime Environment -> Schedule Background Job for Missed Deadlines by double clicking on it and execute it. You could maintain the interval until next deadline check. You could keep the number low.
Also, if you have the event queue turned on, some times the work items will stuck in the queues and took a long time for them to be available.
Best Regards,
Jennifer Cha
GRC RIG

Marker update for Inventory data sources

Hi all,
why we use marker update in Cube manage for inventory data sources at the time of loading?
i heard that to avoid the keyfigures cumulation we do check that option ,is that correct/
please clear my doubt
thx

HI
(2LIS_03_BF Goods Movement From Inventory Management-------Unckeck the no marker update tab)
(2LIS_03_BX Stock Initialization for Inventory Management--
---select the no marker update check box)
2LIS_03_UM Revaluations -
Unckeck the no marker update tab)
in the infopackege of "collaps"
Cheers

Aggregates for inventory cube

hello
Can I use aggreagates for inventory cube (non-cumulative)?
thanks

Hi,
yes, you can suggest the aggregate for non cumulative (inventory cube) but with special care of time char. You need to include all time char in aggregates.
also see the help doc for details on how to use aggregates with non cumulative data model.
Dev

Missing content for inventory management (cube 0IC_C03)

Hi everybody,
I installed the following BI content for inventory management: Cube 0IC_C03, InfoSource 2LIS_03_BX and transfer rules from data source 2LIS_03_BX to info source 2LIS_03_BX. However, I'm not able to the update rule from info source 2LIS_03_BX to info cube 0IC_C03. I can only find the old update rule 0IC_C032LIS_40_S278 -> 0IC_C03.
I also couldn't find the update rule for material movements from 2LIS_03_BF to infocube 0IC_C03.
How can I find this missing content. We are using BI Content Release 704 Level 1.
Thanks for your help!
Thomas

Hi Oscar,
unfortunately, I was not able to find a transformation for the datasource migrated to 7.0.
Btw, how do I determine to which version data sources are replicated. I have an underlying ECC6.0 system. When I replicate all data sources for that source system, datasources automatically show up as 7.0. I'm missing the pop-up question whether or not I want to replicate as 3.5 or 7.0.
Thanks in advance!
Thomas

Commitment for inventory purchase

Hello experts,
our customer it is requesting us to manage commitment not only with direct consumption purchases but also with inventory purcahses. I found that the inventory account can be set as "Cost Element Category" = 90 Statistical cost element for balance sheet.
It seems that with this category I can manage a statiscal cost for balance accounts (such as the inventory account). But the thing is that in order to get this statistical cost I need to assign an account assingment category and a cost allocation object in the purchase order so that I can allocat the statistical cost in the order (as this is the requirement from the customer).
My question is, for sure this is something I can get using account assignment category "Q" and projects. But is it possible to achieve the same result by using "F" and orders??
In thi end, the requirement from the customer is to manage commitment for inventory purchases.
Best regards

Thank you for the information.
For anyone that has a problem creating balance sheet cost elements in the future please refer to SAP Note 75980.
This Note provides guidance on error KS036 that stops a cost element from being created from a balance sheet account. The Note gives steps to remove error message KI098 which indirectly deactivates message KS036 to allow a cost element to be created.

ALV Report for Inventory

Hi All,
Is there a way to make customized reports using ALV grid for Inventory reporting as like in Purchasing.
Regards
Ashok

I think you need to have those developed.
See threads below.
http://scn.sap.com/thread/321656
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/Snippets/MM+Inventory+Report+ALV+GRID

Offsetting Entry for Inventory Posting

Hi ,
While Working on Automatic Postings - Offsetting Entry for Inventory Posting
can any one explain me what are all General modification ,valuation modification entries made ?
What are all General Valuation Class applicable for GBB Entries & give me the G / L account details where the entries will be posted
Please give me solution on this
Thanks & Regards,
Pioneer

Refer belo link this may give some idea
http://d.yimg.com/kq/groups/54256/740187646/name/SAP_FI_MM_SD_integration_20090615.pdf

INIT for inventory

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for