Inner shadow style displays wrong angle

In Encore CS3 the basic sytle +inner shadow diplays the shadow at 0 degrees and not 135 as shown in the thumbnail. Is there a work around for this.

Its the inner shadow that I need. If I import a button directly from a pdf file its ok. If I put the style in the style library it fails.

Similar Messages

Inner shadow effect and layers in PSE 9

Hi,
I was wondering if someone could assist me.
In PSE 9, I opened a photo>selected it>created a new layer and applied an inner shadow without a problem. However, when I selected the TEXT tool and wrote some text in a new layer on top of the photo and dropped a shadow and/or bevel on the text, the text appears blurry and the shadow effect doesn't look right. I tried the same effects on the text wihtout adding an inner shadow to the photo underneath and the text looked great. Any thoughts on what I am doing wrong?
Thanks!

Try right clicking on the T symbol in the tool box and choose Horizontal Type Mask Tool.
Then type your text and see if adding your layer style looks any better.

Is there a way to make the Inner Shadow to only render over the fill, and not stroke of a rectangle?

To be precise, I want to recreate this button in Fireworks (original here):
I created a rectangle with the stroke set to the dark orange color, and the fill to the light yellow color. Then I wanted to add a white inner shadow with 50% opacity to make the effect that's visible in the inner top, left, and right edges. However the shadow is also affecting the stroke. Is there a way to make it only affect the fill?
Thanks.

Actually, you can control the stacking order of filter effects. So you could apply the Inner Shadow effect to the object without the stroke, and then add the Stroke via the Photoshop Live Effects (at the bottom of the Filters menu).
Both this and the Gradient Fill options would allow you to save the appearance as a Style, where it could then be applied to other buttons or objects.

Drop shadows on text do not behave in the same way to inner shadows on objects

I have piece of text with a drop shadow on top of a box which has an inner shadow. In both cases, the shadows are CMYK black, with 100% opacity, applied using the Multiply method.
When designing, things appear correctly (note background is CMYK magenta, but will change once this issue is resolved):
When outputting in the Press format, with everything left as defaults, then two issues are seen, firstly is the Yucky Box Problem, the second is the drop shadow has lost it's colour, and looks as it does if I choose Normal for the shadow type. Note the PDF viewer is Apple Preview in Lion:
If I embed the CMYK colour profile I'm using (Coated FOGRA39), then the YBP goes away, but the colour of the shadow is still wrong:
Finally, if I force the transparency to be flattened, it appears correctly but with a thin white line (note profiles are not being embedded in this case):
Case 1
Case 2
Case 3
Case 4
What I would like to know is how to ensure the output is as it should be in the final case, but without the white line, i.e. without flattening. It's worth noting that if the text is located in the main, white, area of the page, then it works correctly in all cases (except the Yucky Box Problem situation which is easily resolved). Thanks in advance!

That seems to have resolved the problem. Interestingly, the 'Yucky Box Problem' doesnt seem to occur regardless of whether I'm importing the profile or not, I guess Adobe Reader is doing it's own stuff with the colour space which Preview isn't. Thanks again for your help!

What is inserting the following code onto pages " div id="bikatoc" style="display: none;" a class="control" Close /a div class="toc" ul li class="toc-h2

I am doing web development and when working with the wordpress dashboard tiny mce, each time I hit the update button the following piece of code is inserted into the page I am working on.
<pre><nowiki><div id="bikatoc" style="display: none;"><a class="control">Close</a>
<div class="toc">
<ul>
<li class="toc-h2"><a href="#toc0">Just for the Health of it</a></li>
<li class="toc-h2"><a href="#toc1">Wild Yukon River Salmon</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
</nowiki></pre>
Something is scanning the h1-h6 tags and creating a table of contents and inserting it into the page. This also happens when I use firebug on other random pages while using firefox.
I have tried several other browsers to determine if this is a wordpress issue, but this only happens in firefox. It also only happens when I make changes with firebug in firefox. Using firebug lite in chrome did not cause this problem.
I have been looking all over to figure out what is going on and why the is happening. It is making development near impossible and is forcing me to use a different browser (which I don't enjoy at all)
Any help you can give me would be wonderful.
Thank you for your help

Is it always hidden with display:none?
One standard diagnostic step is to try Firefox's Safe Mode to see whether it is caused by a custom setting or add-on.
First, I recommend backing up your Firefox settings in case something goes wrong. See [https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Backing+up+your+information Backing up your information]. (You can copy your entire Firefox profile folder somewhere outside of the Mozilla folder.)
Next, restart Firefox in [http://support.mozilla.com/kb/Safe+Mode Safe Mode] using
Help > Restart with Add-ons Disabled
In the Safe Mode dialog, do not check any boxes, just click "Continue in Safe Mode."
If the inserts stop, this points to an add-on as the problem. Figuring out which one it is would be the next step. (If the TOC is always hidden, perhaps it is something SEO-related.)

Image: How can I set the inner shadow and inner glow

Hi
How can I set the inner shadow and inner glow of a picture in a graphic frame? Any ideas which boss is to use?
is there anywhere an example?
Thanks
Hans

Hi I try to change the attributes (inner shadow and inner glow) using the following code: int CTest::test(UIDRef uidRefPageItem) { int iErr = ERR_NO; int iReturn = -1; UID uidColor = -1; IXPAttributeSuite::AttributeList oAttrList; IXPAttributeSuite::AttributeTypeAndValue oAttribute; do { // Interface atrribute utils Utils<IXPAttributeUtils> ipAttributeUtils; // Set attribute list { IXPAttributeSuite::AttributeTypeAndValue oAttribute(IXPAttributeSuite::kContentInnerShadowApply, kTrue); oAttrList.push_back(oAttribute); } { IXPAttributeSuite::AttributeTypeAndValue oAttribute(IXPAttributeSuite::kContentInnerShadowBlendMode, kPMBlendNormal); oAttrList.push_back(oAttribute); } { IXPAttributeSuite::AttributeTypeAndValue oAttribute(IXPAttributeSuite::kContentInnerShadowOpacity, 50.0); oAttrList.push_back(oAttribute); } UIDList uidList(uidRefPageItem); // Kommando ausführen iReturn = ipAttributeUtils->ApplyAttributesToPageItems(oAttrList, uidList); if (iReturn != kSuccess) { iErr = -1; break; } } while (kFalse); return iErr; } iReturn is success, but this code doesn't change the attributes for an inner shadow. - What could be wrong? - Is it right to use the uid reference from the page item or is it neccessary to use the uid refernece of the image? Thanks for the support. Kind regards Hans

Inline text-shadow style property missing

Hi, I'm wondering if anyone has come across this as I'm at a loss trying to debug it.
I create a composition with text that has a text-shadow. The text shadow is there when I preview in IE11. I upload to my own site and it works fine.
Update: I've checked the composition in the LCMS on other browsers and the text-shadow is there. Looks like it could be an IE issue.
However, when I upload to my clients LCMS, all works correctly, except there are no text-shadows. When I inspect the code produced, the inline text-shadow style property is missing i.e. it is not hard coded in! Everything else is as expected.
In order to deploy the composition to my clients LCMS, I have to change some image url's but otherwise, there are no differences.
I can't work out why the JavaScript is not writing the text-shadow to the elements.
Does anyone know where I can put checks in my JS to see what is happening?
Thanks for any help.
Cheers,
Patrick

Of course, text shadows are not supported in IE9 in particular. I am not sure whether filter is still supported though. You might want to check that out.
Try using filter instead in your css code like:
filter: progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.Shadow(color=#000000,direction=45);
Note: keep text-shadow for the other browsers too.
Hope it works but I make no promise.

CS3: Inner Shadow crashes InDesign

When placing images in large documents (1745 x 995 mm) and using the effect Inner Shadow on the image, InDesign crashes when exporting to PDF.
This is a real puzzle cause when I use the same image with that effect in a smaller document (A4) I have NO problem in exporting the document. Why is that? Is there a work-around, some settings I've missed or an upgrade that fixes this problem (I have IND CS3 5.0.3).

I've isolated the problem. Took me about 15 InDesign restarts.
The problem has nothing to do with PDF settings (I tried all the defaults with or without transparency. High-res and Low-res. RGB and CMYK). InDesign crashes when it's trying to download the image with the effect. It doesn't really get to making the PDF.
The problem is...The file size! I tried it with different kind of file-types (jpg, tif, psd - 8 bit, RGB and CMYK with or without icc-profiles)No matter what kind of file InDesign crashes when handling the effect on the image (120 MB). When I used another smaller image (only 20 MB) or the same image downsampled, InDesign made the PDF. So it seems to be the amount of pixels in the image that has an effect on InDesign handling the effects.
Has this something to do with my hardware (PC, 4 GB RAM, 8*3158 MHz processors, Virtual memory: 3 GB) or is it the software?

Images are displayed wrong in firefox

Hello!
I am a photographer, uploading images in png to my gallery at deviantart.com. I noticed that the images are displayed wrongly in firefox - but in IE9 and Opera they are shown correctly. I have tried with different color management settings in about:config but none of that has solved the problem. I would like to know why it is that firefox can't show the colours correctly, like opera and IE?
If it's impossible to fix I will just simply have to stop using firefox which would be a shame when I have been using the browser for many years. The problem has not existed earlier.
Best regards

http://kasperarts.deviantart.com/gallery/#/d2to4iq
That image for instance. And I save them using Adobe RGB since thtat's the colour space I work in, but this has never been a problem before.

Mx Components displaying wrong the embedded Font

Hi, I'm developing with Adobe Flash Builder 4.5 and I have a problem that the mx components displaying wrong the embedded font which is embedded in a css-file. But spark components have no problems with displaying the embedded font.
thanks

See the embedded fonts post on my blog. The MX components default to a
different embedded font subsystem.
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe System, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui

Fonts display wrong in Final Cut Pro

One of the other editors in the office put together this piece and now I am making some changes to it on my machine. We're using the font "Baskerville" a common font that comes on the computer, and it is showing up correctly in the Font Book, but it is not showing up correctly in Final Cut Pro.
There should be other options like regular, bold, semiBold etc, but there's only bold, italic, and bold italic.
The other strange part is that when I first opened it on my computer it displayed wrong, and I tried reinstalling the fonts, and then it worked fine. I tried reinstalling the font again but it didn't help. I also tried restarting and that didn't help either. I checked in the Library > Fonts folder as well as the fonts folder under my user and the fonts match.
Any suggestions as to what I could do?

As far as I remember, Final Cut has always had this issue....
I believe it has something to do with Final Cut only reading True Type (not Post script) fonts.
That's why I only use Text for simple things like legals. For all other text uses, I use Photoshop...

Bug report : Navigator display wrong messages in package body

Just run some code , you can see the Navigator display wrong messages in the package body,but the package work fine in sqlplus / toad or other tools.
create or replace package SIMPLE AS
Procedure simple_proc ;
END;
create or replace package body SIMPLE AS
Procedure simple_proc
IS
v_tname varchar2(100);
begin
SELECT PERCENTILE_disc(0.5) WITHIN GROUP (ORDER BY tabtype DESC)
          INTO v_tname
          FROM tab;
END simple_proc;
END;
Then open the package body in the Navigator (Connection Pane==> Connection Name ==> Packages ==> Simple Body ) , and show the error message:
Unexpected token
Missing Expression
But if I just create the procedure out of the package , it work fine.
CREATE OR REPLACE
Procedure simple_proc
IS
v_tname varchar2(100);
begin
SELECT PERCENTILE_disc(0.5) WITHIN GROUP (ORDER BY tabtype DESC)
          INTO v_tname
          FROM tab;
END simple_proc;
/

This has already been discussed a number of times (see http://forums.oracle.com/forums/search.jspa?objID=f260&q=Unexpected+token).
As I understand it, it is related to the parser that SQL Developer is using to display the package decomposition in the navigator not coping with the full PL/SQL and SQL syntax (largely analytical functions from memory).

Inner Shadow missing feature?

I'm looking for a better alternative to my current vector graphic applications, mostly to create modern web and application UI's.
So I downloaded the trial version of Illustrator CC, to see if I should make the jump to Illustrator for vector work.
After using about half a day to learn the applicaiton and do some experimentation, I was going to apply an Inner shadow to some text on a button, to make it look indented, and was like "What the.....where's the Inner Shadow Effect?".
I could see the Drop Shadow feature, and there's an Inner Glow feature (can't be offset), but that doesn't solve the problem of making shapes and text look indented.
If anyone doesn't know what I mean, just browse 'Inner Shadow' on google, it's such a fundamental feature.
Photoshop has it.
InDesign has it.
Fireworks has it.
Even Sketch, the app for Mac has it. And Acorn has it as well.
Hell, I can even write it in CSS3:
.example {
-moz-box-shadow: inset -5px -5px #888;
-webkit-box-shadow: inset -5px -5px #888;
box-shadow: inset -5px -5px #888;
So I looked around the web, and realized Illustrator has no Inner Shadow feature (!!), but there are work arounds. Here's an example:
http://vectorboom.com/load/effects/innershadow/3-1-0-257
(Or this:)
http://www.webdesign.org/raster-graphics/fireworks/mastering-shadows-in-photoshop-illustra tor-and-fireworks-who-s-the-winner.19730.html
Sorry, but when you are used to applying something so fundamental as Inner Shadow, to make your shapes and texts look indented with a single click (and easily adjust it live and experiment), then it's hard to get used to Illustrator.
And when something so basic is missing, then you can only fear what else will also hinder you, as you continue to learn the application and try to make the switch.
Looking at the forum and others who have requested the same thing, and for so long, it sadly also says something about how much adobe listens to the community.
Sorry but this is a deal breaker for me, and my trial stops here.
I'm sure Illustrator can do a lot of other fancy things, but since it still havent figured out the fundamentals (shadow and indented), I'm not buying.

Yeah Photoshop, and most other vector applications I've tried (even CSS3 stylesheet has it!).
I searched the web and found out this feature has been much requested and needed for many many years.
What I get from that, is that Adobe is not a developer that listens to it's community. And that's what I get from just using the Trial version of their latest software, Illustrator CC...there is no excuse for not having inner shadow in a vector graphics application, especially not one that's this expensive, just makes it embarrising.
Damn, I was hoping to switch to Illustrator...

Inner shadow box with paper fill overprinting?

(Mac Pro 4,1 / 2.66 GHz Quad/12G InDesign: CS6 / Ver. 8.0.2)
I have 2 boxes filled with paper and Inner shadow effect with black (created in InDesign), Background is a 4 color linear gradient (left is 4c green, middle is paper, right 4c green) from Illustrator.
The Inner shadow box that is close to the top of gradient (more green than white) is ok.
The Inner shadow box that sits on the paper fill of the gradient, appears to be overprinting, thus no paper fill.
I have check fills of the Inner shadow box in InDesign, to make sure it is not overprinting.
I have tried some tricks but nothing works.
Ideas anyone?

I found the solution:
You should never use white as a color in a gradient. I have always been told to use 5-10% of the gradient color.
This gradient create in Illustrator using:
left is 4c green, middle is paper, right 4c green
Solution:
Duplicated the green and made a spot
modified gradient to:
left 4c green, middle 8% of Spot green, right 4c green
Been a few years and I forgot prepress 101, white is not a color and should never be used in a gradient.
Hope this helps someone in the future.
Thank you Leonie15

CMFCToolbar and CMFCMenubar displaying wrong tooltips

Quastion asked also on
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/29800791/cmfctoolbar-and-cmfcmenubar-displaying-wrong-tooltips
Hello.
I am using Visual Studio 2010, but I suspect the bug is still present on the 2013 version, as I compared the winfrm.cpp file and the OnToolTipText are exactly equal on the two files.
The bug is happening always at the 7th, 8th or 16th element.
Although separators count as elements for this counting, the tooltips do not appear over them.
Element can be a textual MENUITEM, a POPUP menu or toolbar button.
The string table defines are:
    #define IDS_SEVEN            7
    #define IDS_EIGHT            8
    #define IDS_NINE             9
    #define IDS_TEN             10
    #define IDS_ELEVEN          11
    #define IDS_TWELVE          12
    #define IDS_THIRTEEN        13
    #define IDS_FOURTEEN        14
    #define IDS_FIFTEEN         15
    #define IDS_SIXTEEN         16
and the STRINGTABLE contents are:
    IDS_SEVEN           "Seven"
    IDS_EIGHT           "Eight"
    IDS_NINE            "Nine"
    IDS_TEN             "Ten"
    IDS_ELEVEN          "Eleven"
    IDS_TWELVE          "Twelve"
    IDS_THIRTEEN        "Thirteen"
    IDS_FOURTEEN        "Fourteen"
    IDS_FIFTEEN         "Fifteen"
    IDS_SIXTEEN         "Sixteen"
So, when I hover with the mouse pointer the 7th, 8th or 16th element I get WRONGLY a tooltip displaying the string with that ID (Example:7th element displays "Seven").
It happens with all my toolbars and all my menus with a sufficient number of items, including in the toplevel horizontal menubar.
I discovered that the guilty function is:
BOOL CFrameWnd::OnToolTipText(UINT, NMHDR* pNMHDR, LRESULT* pResult)
as the nID local variable does not get the ABSOLUTE ID of the Command, but the POSITIONAL order of the button, starting with 1 instead of 0.
If I would move the strings IDs out of that range, whenever a user wants to add new strings, the Visual Studio Resource Editor would see that space free and use it, filling it again. And the problem would happen again. So, it is not a valid solution.
I could also define strings for all commands. But as we are maintaining four TFS branches at the same time and the change needs to go to all branches, this change would be potentially very dangerous when doing merges after.
So, please what solution do you recommend to not display those stupid tooltips?
UPDATE: I didn't copy the string table exactly as it was. It was like this:
    IDS_SEVEN           "Seven\nSeven"
    IDS_EIGHT           "Eight\nEight"
    IDS_NINE            "Nine"
    IDS_TEN             "Ten"
    IDS_ELEVEN          "Eleven"
    IDS_TWELVE          "Twelve"
    IDS_THIRTEEN        "Thirteen"
    IDS_FOURTEEN        "Fourteen"
    IDS_FIFTEEN         "Fifteen"
    IDS_SIXTEEN         "Sixteen\nSixteen"

In the update I put a stringtable more similar to the one I had. I had not noticed before a common feature of 7, 8 and 16 th strings: they all had '\n' characters in their contents.
I think nobody will create a menu with more than 512 menuitems nor toolbars with more than 512 buttons, so my solution was to change all strings containing '\n' characters with an ID below 512 to numbers above 512.
And it works.

Inner shadow style displays wrong angle

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for