Insert into a table with unique columns from another table.

There are two tables,
STG_DATA                                                          
ORDER_NO    DIR_CUST_IND
1002                     DNA
1005                     GEN
1005    
1008                     NULL
1001                     NULL
1001                     NULL
1006                     NULL
1000                     ZZZ
1001                     ZZZ
FACT_DATA
ORDER_NO    DIR_CUST_IND
1005                      NULL
1006                      NULL
1008                      NULL
I need to insert only unique [ORDER_NO] from STG_DATA to FACT_DATA with corresponding [DIR_CUST_IND]. Though STG_DATA has multiple rows with same ORDER_NO, I need to insert only one of that it can be any record.
Sarvan

CREATE TABLE #Level(ORDER_NO INT, DIR_CUST_IND CHAR(3))
INSERT #Level
SELECT 1002,'DNA' UNION
SELECT 1005,'GEN' UNION
SELECT 1005,NULL UNION
SELECT 1008,NULL UNION
SELECT 1001,NULL UNION
SELECT 1001,NULL UNION
SELECT 1006,NULL UNION
SELECT 1000,'ZZZ' UNION
SELECT 1001,'ZZZ'
SELECT ORDER_NO,DIR_CUST_IND
FROM( SELECT ROW_NUMBER()OVER(PARTITION BY ORDER_NO ORDER BY ORDER_NO) RowNum,*
FROM #Level)A
WHERE RowNum=1
I hope this would give you enough idea. All you have to do is just write insert statement.
Next time please post DDL & DML.
Chaos isn’t a pit. Chaos is a ladder. Many who try to climb it fail and never get to try again. The fall breaks them. And some are given a chance to climb, but they refuse. They cling to the realm, or the gods, or love. Illusions. Only the ladder is real.
The climb is all there is.

Similar Messages

  • Constantly inserting into large table with unique index... Guidance?

    Hello all;
    So here is my world. We have central to our data monitoring system an oracle database running Oracle Standard One (please don't laugh... I understand it is comical) licensing.
    This DB is about 1.7 TB of small record data.
    One table in particular (the raw incoming data, 350gb, 8 billion rows, just in the table) is fed millions of rows each day in real time by two to three main "data collectors" or what have you. Data must be available in this table "as fast as possible" once it is received.
    This table has 6 columns (one varchar usually empty, a few numerics including a source id, a timestamp and a create time).
    The data is collect in chronological order (increasing timestamp) 90% of the time (though sometimes the timestamp may be very old and catch up to current). The other 10% of the time the data can be out of order according to the timestamp.
    This table has two indexes, unique (sourceid, timestamp), and a non unique (create time). (FYI, this used to be an IOT until we had to add the second index on create time, at which point a secondary index on create time slowed the IOT to a crawl)
    About 80% of this data is removed after it ages beyond 3 months; 20% is retained as "special" long term data (customer pays for longer raw source retention). The data is removed using delete statements. This table is never (99.99% of the time) updated. The indexes are not rebuilt... ever... as a rebuild is about a 20+ hour process, and without online rebuilds since we are standard one, this is just not possible.
    Now what we are observing is that the inserts into this table
    - Inserts are much slower based on a "wider" cardinality of the "sourceid" of the data being inserted. What I mean is that 10,000 inserts for 10,000 sourceid (regardless of timestamp) is MUCH, MUCH slower than 10,000 inserts for a single sourceid. This makes sense to me, as I understand it that oracle must inspect more branches of the index for uniqueness, and more different physical blocks will be used to store the new index data. There are about 2 million unique sourceId across our system.
    - Over time, oracle is requesting more and more ram to satisfy these inserts in a timely matter. My understanding here is that oracle is attempting to hold the leafs of these indexes perpetually buffers. Our system does have a 99% cache hit rate. However, we are seeing oracle requiring roughly 10GB extra ram per quarter to 6 months; we're at about 50gb of ram just for oracle already.
    - If I emulate our production load on a brand new, empty table / indexes, performance is easily 10x to 20x faster than what I see when I do the same tests with the large production copies of data.
    We have the following assumption: Partitioning this table based on good logical grouping of sourceid, and then timestamp, will help reduce the work required by oracle to verify uniqueness of data, reducing the amount of data that must be cached by oracle, and allow us to handle our "older than 3 month" at a partition level, greatly reducing table and index fragmentation.
    Based on our hardware, its going to be about a million dollar hit to upgrade to Enterprise (with partitioning), plus a couple hundred thousand a year in support. Currently I think we pay a whopping 5 grand a year in support, if that, total oracle costs. This is going to be a huge pill for our company to swallow.
    What I am looking for guidance / help on, should we really expect partitioning to make a difference here? I want to get that 10x performance difference back we see between a fresh empty system, and our current production system. I also want to limit oracles 10gb / quarter growing need for more buffer cache (the cardinality of sourceid does NOT grow by that much per quarter... maybe 1000s per quarter, out of 2 million).
    Also, please I'd appreciate it if there were no mocking comments about using standard one up to this point :) I know it is risky and insane and maybe more than a bit silly, but we make due with what we have. And all the credit in the world to oracle that their "entry" level system has been able to handle everything we've thrown at it so far! :)
    Alright all, thank you very much for listening, and I look forward to hear the opinions of the experts.

    Hello,
    Here is a link to a blog article that will give you the right questions and answers which apply to your case:
    http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/?s=delete+90%25
    As far as you are deleting 80% of your data (old data) based on a timestamp, then don't think at all about using the direct path insert /*+ append */ as suggested by one of the contributors to this thread. The direct path load will not re-use any free space made by the delete. You have two indexes:
    (a) unique index (sourceid, timestamp)
    (b) index(create time)
    Your delete logic (based on arrival time) will smatch your indexes as far as you are always deleting the left hand side of the index; it means you will have what we call a right hand index - In other words, the scattering of the index key per leaf block is certainly catastrophic (there is an oracle iternal function named sys_op_lidbid that will allow you to verify this index information). There is a fairly chance that your two indexes will benefit from a coalesce as already suggested:
               ALTER INDEX indexname COALESCE;This coalesce should be investigated to be done on a regular basis (may be after each 80% delete) You seem to have several sourceid for one timestamp. If the answer is yes you should think about compressing this index
        create index indexname (sourceid, timestamp) compress;     
    or
        alter index indexname rebuild compress;     You will do it only once. Your index will have a smaller size and may be more efficient than it is actually. The index compression will add an extra CPU work during an insert but it might help improving the overal insert process.
    Best Regards
    Mohamed Houri

  • How to insert into 2 tables from the same page (with one button  link)

    Hi,
    I have the following 2 tables....
    Employees
    emp_id number not null
    name varchar2(30) not null
    email varchar2(50)
    hire_date date
    dept_id number
    PK = emp_id
    FK = dept_id
    Notes
    note_id number not null
    added_on date not null
    added_by varchar2(30) not null
    note varchar2(4000)
    emp_id number not null
    PK = note_id
    FK = emp_id
    I want to do an insert into both tables via the application and also via the same page (with one button link). I have made a form to add an employee with an add button - adding an employee is no problem.
    Now, on the same page, I have added a html text area in another region, where the user can write a note. But how do I get the note to insert into the Notes table when the user clicks the add button?
    In other words, when the user clicks 'add', the employee information should be inserted into the Employees table and the note should be inserted into the Notes table.
    How do I go about doing this?
    Thanks.

    Hi,
    These are my After Submit Processes...
    After Submit
    30     Process Row of NOTES     Automatic Row Processing (DML)     Unconditional
    30     Process Row of EMPLOYEES     Automatic Row Processing (DML)     Unconditional
    40     reset page     Clear Cache for all Items on Pages (PageID,PageID,PageID)     Unconditional
    40     reset page     Clear Cache for all Items on Pages (PageID,PageID,PageID)     Unconditional
    40     reset page     Clear Cache for all Items on Pages (PageID,PageID,PageID)     Unconditional
    40     reset page     Clear Cache for all Items on Pages (PageID,PageID,PageID)     Unconditional
    50     Insert into Tables     PL/SQL anonymous block     Conditional
    My pl/sql code is the same as posted earlier.
    Upon inserting data into the forms and clicking the add button, I get this error...
    ORA-06550: line 1, column 102: PL/SQL: ORA-00904: "NOTES": invalid identifier ORA-06550: line 1, column 7: PL/SQL: SQL Statement ignored
         Error      Unable to process row of table EMPLOYEES.
    Is there something wrong with the pl/sql code or is it something else?

  • How to extract data from xml and insert into Oracle table

    Hi,
    I have a large xml file. which will have hundreds of the following transaction tags having column names and there values.
    There is a table one of the schema with coulums "actualCostRate","billRate"....etc.
    I need to extract the values of these columns and insert into the table
    <Transaction actualCostRate="0" billRate="0" chargeable="1" clientID="NikuUK" chargeCode="LCOCD1" externalID="L-RESCODE_UK1-PROJ_UK_CNT_GBP-37289-8" importStatus="N" projectID="TESTPROJ" resourceID="admin" transactionDate="2002-02-12" transactionType="L" units="11" taskID="5017601" inputTypeCode="SALES" groupId="123" voucherNumber="ABCVDD" transactionClass="ABCD"/>
    <Transaction actualCostRate="0" billRate="0" chargeable="1" clientID="NikuEU" chargeCode="LCOCD1" externalID="L-RESCODE_US1-PROJ_EU_STD2-37291-4" importStatus="N" projectID="TESTPROJ" resourceID="admin" transactionDate="2002-02-04" transactionType="L" units="4" taskID="5017601" inputTypeCode="SALES" groupId="124" voucherNumber="EEE222" transactionClass="DEFG"/>

    Re: Insert from XML to relational table
    http://www.google.ae/search?hl=ar&q=extract+data+from+xml+and+insert+into+Oracle+table+&btnG=%D8%A8%D8%AD%D8%AB+Google&meta=

  • Selecting Records from 125 million record table to insert into smaller table

    Oracle 11g
    I have a large table of 125 million records - t3_universe.  This table never gets updated or altered once loaded,  but holds data that we receive from a lead company.
    I need to select records from this large table that fit certain demographic criteria and insert those into a smaller table - T3_Leads -  that will be updated with regard to when the lead is mailed and for other relevant information.
    My question is what is the best (fastest) approach to select records from this 125 million record table to insert into the smaller table.  I have tried a variety of things - views, materialized views, direct insert into smaller table...I think I am probably missing other approaches.
    My current attempt has been to create a View using the query that selects the records as shown below.  Then use a second query that inserts into T3_Leads from this View V_Market.  This is very slow. Can I just use an Insert Into T3_Leads with this query - it did not seem to work with the WITH clause?    My Index on the large table is t3_universe_composite and includes zip_code, address_key, household_key. 
    CREATE VIEW V_Market  as
    WITH got_pairs    AS  
         SELECT /*+ INDEX_FFS(t3_universe t3_universe_composite) */  l.zip_code, l.zip_plus_4, l.p1_givenname, l.surname, l.address, l.city, l.state, l.household_key, l.hh_type as l_hh_type, l.address_key, l.narrowband_income, l.p1_ms, l.p1_gender, l.p1_exact_age, l.p1_personkey, e.hh_type as filler_data, 1.p1_seq_no, l.p2_seq_no 
         ,      ROW_NUMBER () OVER ( PARTITION BY  l.address_key 
                                      ORDER BY      l.hh_verification_date  DESC 
                      ) AS r_num   
         FROM   t3_universe  e   
         JOIN   t3_universe  l  ON   
                l.address_key  = e.address_key
                AND l.zip_code = e.zip_code
              AND   l.p1_gender != e.p1_gender
                 AND   l.household_key != e.household_key         
                 AND  l.hh_verification_date  >= e.hh_verification_date 
      SELECT  * 
      FROM  got_pairs
      where l_hh_type !=1 and l_hh_type !=2 and filler_data != 1 and filler_data != 2 and zip_code in (select * from M_mansfield_02048) and p1_exact_age BETWEEN 25 and 70 and narrowband_income >= '8' and r_num = 1
    Then
    INSERT INTO T3_leads(zip, zip4, firstname, lastname, address, city, state, household_key, hh_type, address_key, income, relationship_status, gender, age, person_key, filler_data, p1_seq_no, p2_seq_no)
    select zip_code, zip_plus_4, p1_givenname, surname, address, city, state, household_key, l_hh_type, address_key, narrowband_income, p1_ms, p1_gender, p1_exact_age, p1_personkey, filler_data, p1_seq_no, p2_seq_no
    from V_Market;

    I had no trouble creating the view exactly as you posted it.  However, be careful here:
    and zip_code in (select * from M_mansfield_02048)
    You should name the column explicitly rather than select *.  (do you really have separate tables for different zip codes?)
    About the performance, it's hard to tell because you haven't posted anything we can use, like explain plans or traces but simply encapsulating your query into a view is not likely to make it any faster.
    Depending on the size of the subset of rows you're selecting, the /*+ INDEX hint may be doing your more harm than good.

  • Inserting into a table which is created "on the fly" from a trigger

    Hello all,
    I am trying to insert into a table from a trigger in Oracle form. The table name however, is inputted by the user in am item form.
    here is what the insert looks like:
    insert into :table_name
    values (:value1, :value2);
    the problem is that forms does not recognize ::table_name. If I replace :table_name with an actual database table, it works fine. However, I need to insert to a table_name based from oracle form item.
    By the way, the table|_name is built on the fly using a procedure before I try to insert into it.
    Any suggestion on how can I do that? My code in the trigger is:
    declare
    dm_drop_tbl(:table_name,'table) // a call to an external procedure to drop the table
    dm_create_tbl(:table_name,'att1','att2');
    insert into :table_name
    values (:value1, :value2);
    this give me an error:
    encounter "" when the symbol expecting one.....

    Hi ,
    You should use the FORMS_DDL built_in procedure. Read the on-line documentation of forms ...
    Simon

  • How to insert into a table with a nested table which refer to another table

    Hello everybody,
    As the title of this thread might not be very understandable, I'm going to explain it :
    In a context of a library, I have an object table about Book, and an object table about Subscriber.
    In the table Subscriber, I have a nested table modeling the Loan made by the subscriber.
    And finally, this nested table refers to the Book table.
    Here the code concerning the creation of theses tables :
    Book :
    create or replace type TBook as object
    number int,
    title varchar2(50)
    Loan :
    create or replace type TLoan as object
    book ref TBook,
    loaning_date date
    create or replace type NTLoan as table of TLoan;
    Subscriber :
    create or replace type TSubscriber as object
    sub_id int,
    name varchar2(25)
    loans NTLoan
    Now, my problem is how to insert into a table of TSubscriber... I tried this query, without any success...
    insert into OSubscriber values
    *(1, 'LEVEQUE', NTLoan(*
    select TLoan(ref(b), '10/03/85') from OBook b where b.number = 1)
    Of course, there is an occurrence of book in the table OBook with the number attribute 1.
    Oracle returned me this error :
    SQL error : ORA-00936: missing expression
    00936. 00000 - "missing expression"
    Thank you for your help

    1) NUMBER is a reserved word - you can't use it as identifier:
    SQL> create or replace type TBook as object
      2  (
      3  number int,
      4  title varchar2(50)
      5  );
      6  /
    Warning: Type created with compilation errors.
    SQL> show err
    Errors for TYPE TBOOK:
    LINE/COL ERROR
    0/0      PL/SQL: Compilation unit analysis terminated
    3/1      PLS-00330: invalid use of type name or subtype name2) Subquery must be enclosed in parenthesis:
    SQL> create table OSubscriber of TSubscriber
      2  nested table loans store as loans
      3  /
    Table created.
    SQL> create table OBook of TBook
      2  /
    Table created.
    SQL> insert
      2    into OBook
      3    values(
      4           1,
      5           'No Title'
      6          )
      7  /
    1 row created.
    SQL> commit
      2  /
    Commit complete.
    SQL> insert into OSubscriber
      2    values(
      3           1,
      4           'LEVEQUE',
      5           NTLoan(
      6                  (select TLoan(ref(b),DATE '1985-10-03') from OBook b where b.num = 1)
      7                 )
      8          )
      9  /
    1 row created.
    SQL> select  *
      2    from  OSubscriber
      3  /
        SUB_ID NAME
    LOANS(BOOK, LOANING_DATE)
             1 LEVEQUE
    NTLOAN(TLOAN(000022020863025C8D48614D708DB5CD98524013DC88599E34C3D34E9B9DBA1418E49F1EB2, '03-OCT-85'))
    SQL> SY.

  • Fetch data from one table and insert into two tables in desired format

    I have similar to the following data in a table and it is not normalized. The groupID is being used to group two records of similar nature.
    DECLARE @OldDoc TABLE (oldDocID INT, groupID INT, deptID INT)
    INSERT INTO @OldDoc (oldDocID, groupID) VALUES (1, NULL, 111),(2,NULL,111),(3,1,111),(4,NULL,333),(5,1,222),(6,NULL,333),(7,2,222),(8,2,333),(9,NULL,111),(10,3,222),(11,NULL,333),(12,3,444)
    I need to process the data from the above table (@OldDoc) and write into two new tables (@NewDoc and @NewDocGroup) as follows.
    oldDocID should be stored as newDocID when inserting to @NewDoc table. Only records with groupID NULL and one record (first one) per group should be considered (For example, oldDocID 5 is not considered as 3 and 5 belong to the same groupID 1) for insertion. 
    DECLARE @NewDoc TABLE (newDocID INT)
    INSERT INTO @NewDoc (newDocID) VALUES (1),(2),(3),(4),(6),(7),(9),(10),(11)
    All records from @OldDoc should be considered for insertion into @NewDocGroup table. OldDocID is inserted as NewDocID and deptID is as-is. Instead of groupID, the ID of the first record in the 
    group should be considered as parentNewDocID (For example, 3 is considered as parentNewDocID for newDocID 5 as 3 and 5 belong to the same groupID in @OldDoc table) for the newDocID.
    DECLARE @NewDocGroup (newDocID INT, parentNewDocID INT, deptID INT)
    INSERT INTO @NewDocGroup (newDocID, parentNewDocID, deptID) VALUES (1,1,111),(2,2,111),(3,3,111),(4,4,333),(5,3,222),(6,6,333),(7,7,222),(8,7,333),(9,9,111),(10,10,222),(11,11,333),(12,10,444)
    How do I accomplish the above using SQL ? Thanks for the help.

    >> I have similar to the following data in a table and it is not normalized. The group_id is being used to group two records [sic] of similar nature. <<
    Rows are not records. Tables have to have a key by definition. You do not do math with identifiers, so they should not be numeric. Let's ignore that error for now. In short, you are posting garbage. If you had followed Forum Netiquette, would you have posted
    this? 
    CREATE TABLE Old_Documents
    (old_doc_id INTEGER NOT NULL PRIMARY KEY, 
     group_id INTEGER, 
     dept_nbr INTEGER NOT NULL
       REFERENCES Departments (dept_nbr));
    INSERT INTO Old_Documents(old_doc_id, group_id, dept_nbr) 
    VALUES  (1, NULL, 111), 
    (2, NULL, 111), 
    (3, 1, 111), 
    (4, NULL, 333), 
    (5, 1, 222), 
    (6, NULL, 333), 
    (7, 2, 222), 
    (8, 2, 333), 
    (9, NULL, 111), 
    (10, 3, 222), 
    (11, NULL, 333), 
    (12, 3, 444);
    >> I need to process the data from the above table (Old_Documents) and write into two new tables (New_Documents and New_Documents_Groups) as follows. <<
    Just like punch cards and mag tape data processing! Being old and being new are a status, not another kind of entity. But that is how mag tapes work. And you even use the verb "fetch" from tape files. This design flaw is called  attribute splitting.
    Do you have a Male_Personnel and Female_Personnel table? NO! It is just Personnel! 
    >> old_doc_id should be stored as new_doc_id when inserting to New_Documents table. Only records [sic] with group_id NULL and one record [sic] (first [sic; no ordering in a table] one) per group should be considered (For example, old_doc_id 5 is not considered
    as 3 and 5 belong to the same group_id =1) for insertion. <<
    Think about your punch card mindset. Why did you physically materialize that redundant New_Documents table? Let me answer that: this is how you work with punch cards! In SQL we use a VIEW:
    CREATE VIEW New_Documents (new_doc_id)
    AS 
    SELECT old_doc_id 
      FROM Old_Documents;
    >> All records [sic] from Old_Documents should be considered for insertion into New_Documents_Groups table. The old_doc_id is inserted as new_doc_id and dept_nbr is as-is. Instead of group_id, the ID [sic: which identifier??] of the first [sic: tables
    have no ordering like a deck of punch cards] record [sic] in the group should be considered as parent_new_doc_id (For example, 3 is considered as parent_new_doc_id for new_doc_id 5 as 3 and 5 belong to the same group_id in Old_Documents table) for the new_doc_id.
    <<
    Why not use 5 as the parent? My guess is that you are trying to form equivalence classes. See:
    https://www.simple-talk.com/content/print.aspx?article=2020
    --CELKO-- Books in Celko Series for Morgan-Kaufmann Publishing: Analytics and OLAP in SQL / Data and Databases: Concepts in Practice Data / Measurements and Standards in SQL SQL for Smarties / SQL Programming Style / SQL Puzzles and Answers / Thinking
    in Sets / Trees and Hierarchies in SQL

  • INSERTING INTO A TABLE FROM ANOTHER TABLE

    Hi,
    I am having a table called emp in which 5 columns are there, I want to insert some rows from another table called employees, only into three columns of emp table through a sub query.
    Is this scenario is possible, I tried so many queries but it is not working out.
    Can any body help me out.
    The columns in emp table is
    empno, ename, doj, designation, salary, deptno, mgrid
    The columns in employees table is
    empno, name, hiredate, post, salary, commission, deptno, mgr
    I want to insert into empno, ename, doj, designation columns of emp table from the employees table empno, name, hiredate, post columns.
    Ramesh.

    It looks like your EMP table has 7 columns, not 5, and you want to insert into 4 columns, not 3.
    insert into emp
      (empno, ename, doj, designation)
      select empno, name, hiredate, post
        from employees;

  • Insert into other table from form

    Hi All,
    I have created a data block with view as a data source. I need to save the data from a form to some other table.
    I have tried using INSTEAD OF Trigger. howeverwhen I try to save, getting an error : ORA-01445 cannot select ROWID from a join view without a key-preserved table.
    I appreciate any suggestions on it.
    Thanks and Regards
    Sai

    Sorry, it looked at first as if you wanted help on the problem you encountered. After reading again your response to Zaibiman I see that you were just tricking us with the detailed explanation of the error.
    To insert into a table other than the one you queried, use the on-insert trigger.
    However, an Instead Of trigger on the view is usually the best method. If you have set the key mode, defined a primary key item and removed any references to rowid, as per Zaibiman, then it should work. You'll need your own locking method if the view uses Group By or Distinct.

  • How to insert into a table from 3 tables?

    Hello,
    How to insert into a table getting values from 3 different tables?
    For example table_A has col_1 to col_10.
    I want to insert into table_A,
    values: col_1 to col_4 are from table_B,
    col_5 is from table_C,
    col_6 to col_10 are from table_D.
    Thanks!

    Normally, you'd do this by joining B, C, and D together. In the simplest case, something like
    INSERT INTO A( col1, ... col10 )
      SELECT B.col1, ..., B.col4,
             C.col5,
             D.col6, ..., D.col10
        FROM B,
             C,
             D,
       WHERE B.someKeyColumn = C.someKeyColumn
         AND C.anotherKeyColumn = D.anotherKeyColumnYou'd have to know how the data in B, C, and D relate to fill in the WHERE clause. This basically tells Oracle how to match the data in a particular row in B with the data in a particular row in C with the data in a particular row in D.
    Justin
    Distributed Database Consulting, Inc.
    http://www.ddbcinc.com/askDDBC

  • Insert into two tables with a single query (same ID)

    Hello,
    I want to insert two tables at the same time ( with a single query) provided that both records get inserted with the same id. How do I do this?
    Table Movies
    id
    name
    Table Category
    movie_id
    cat_typea) Insert into first table, retrieve the id (may be by using my_sequence.currval and then insert into another table.
    issue: Makes three query to the db, I am also guessing that when multiple people try to insert there will be an issue, I might be wrong.
    I don't have any other idea.
    Greatly appreciated!

    Why don't use multitable insert ? It's available from 9i.
    A sequence.nextval will return the same value within the whole instruction
    so all records can be inserted with the same id.
    Look at this example:
    DROP TABLE A;
    DROP TABLE B;
    drop sequence a_seq;
    CREATE TABLE A(
      ID NUMBER,
      FIRSTNAME VARCHAR2(50)
    CREATE TABLE B AS
    SELECT id, firstname lastname FROM a;
    CREATE SEQUENCE a_seq
    START WITH 1;
    INSERT ALL
    INTO A(ID, FIRSTNAME) VALUES(A_SEQ.NEXTVAL, FNAME)
    INTO B(ID, LASTNAME) VALUES(A_SEQ.NEXTVAL, LNAME)
    SELECT 'fname ' || LEVEL FNAME, 'lname ' || LEVEL LNAME
    FROM DUAL
    CONNECT BY LEVEL < 10
    COMMIT;
    SELECT * FROM A;
    SELECT * FROM b;
    DROP TABLE A succeeded.
    DROP TABLE B succeeded.
    drop sequence a_seq succeeded.
    CREATE TABLE succeeded.
    CREATE TABLE succeeded.
    CREATE SEQUENCE succeeded.
    18 rows inserted
    commited
    ID                     FIRSTNAME                                         
    3                      fname 1                                           
    4                      fname 2                                           
    5                      fname 3                                           
    6                      fname 4                                           
    7                      fname 5                                           
    8                      fname 6                                           
    9                      fname 7                                           
    10                     fname 8                                           
    11                     fname 9                                           
    9 rows selected
    ID                     LASTNAME                                          
    3                      lname 1                                           
    4                      lname 2                                           
    5                      lname 3                                           
    6                      lname 4                                           
    7                      lname 5                                           
    8                      lname 6                                           
    9                      lname 7                                           
    10                     lname 8                                           
    11                     lname 9                                           
    9 rows selected

  • Fetch data from two tables and insert into one table

    I have similar to the following data in two tables (@Plant, @PlantDirector) and need to consolidate into one table (@PlantNew) as follows.
    DECLARE @Plant TABLE (PlantID INT, PlantName VARCHAR(100))
    INSERT INTO @Plant (PlantID, PlantName) VALUES (1, 'Name One'),(2, 'Name Two'),(3, 'Name Three'),(4, 'Name Four'),(5, 'Name Five'),(6, 'Name Six')
    Director data for the Plants exist in the following table. Assistant value 1 means Assistant Director and 0 means Director. 
    Data exists only for subset of plants and a Plant may have one or both roles.
    DECLARE @PlantDirector TABLE (PlantID INT, PlantDirectorID INT, Assistant bit)
    INSERT INTO @PlantDirector (PlantID, PlantDirectorID, Assistant) VALUES (2, 111, 1),(2, 222, 0),(4, 333, 0),(6,444,1)
    The above data needs to be inserted into one table (@PlantNew) as follows: 
    PlantID in @Plant table is IDENTITY value and needs to be inserted as-is into this table.
    PlantDirExists will get a value of 1 if at least one record exists in @PlantDirector table for a PlantID. PlantAssistantDirID and PlantDirID should be set to the corresponding PlantDirID or NULL appropriately depending on the data.
    DECLARE @PlantNew TABLE (PlantID INT, PlantName VARCHAR(100), PlantDirExists bit, PlantAssistantDirID INT, PlantDirID INT)
    INSERT INTO @PlantNew (PlantID, PlantName, PlantDirExists, PlantAssistantDirID, PlantDirID)
    VALUES (1, 'Name One', 0, NULL, NULL),(2, 'Name Two', 1, 111, 222),(3, 'Name Three', 0, NULL, NULL),(4, 'Name Four', 1, NULL, 333),(5, 'Name Five', 0, NULL, NULL),(6, 'Name Six',1, 444, NULL)
    How do I achieve the above using SQL ? Thanks.

    like this
    INSERT @PlantNew  (PlantID, PlantName, PlantDirExists, PlantAssistantDirID, PlantDirID) 
    SELECT p.PlantID,
    p.PlantName,
    CASE WHEN pd.PlantID IS NULL THEN 0 ELSE 1 END,
    PlantAssistantDirID,
    PlantDirID
    FROM @Plant p
    LEFT JOIN (SELECT PlantID,
    MAX(CASE WHEN Assistant = 1 THEN PlantDirectorID END) AS PlantAssistantDirID,
    MAX(CASE WHEN Assistant = 0 THEN PlantDirectorID END) AS PlantDirID
    @PlantDirector
    GROUP BY PlantID)pd
    ON pd.PlantID = p.PlantID
    Please Mark This As Answer if it helps to solve the issue Visakh ---------------------------- http://visakhm.blogspot.com/ https://www.facebook.com/VmBlogs
    You're missing a FROM
    insert into @PlantNew
    SELECT p.PlantID,
    p.PlantName,
    CASE WHEN pd.PlantID IS NULL THEN 0 ELSE 1 END,
    PlantAssistantDirID,
    PlantDirID
    FROM @Plant p
    LEFT JOIN (SELECT PlantID,
    MAX(CASE WHEN Assistant = 1 THEN PlantDirectorID END) AS PlantAssistantDirID,
    MAX(CASE WHEN Assistant = 0 THEN PlantDirectorID END) AS PlantDirID
    from @PlantDirector
    GROUP BY PlantID)pd
    ON pd.PlantID = p.PlantID

  • Record not inserting into sap table with connector framework ?

    here is the code, but record not being inserting into the table ... but same piece of code working fine while updating ... the record ...
    try {
    interaction = connection.createInteractionEx();
    IInteractionSpec interactionSpec = interaction.getInteractionSpec();
    String functionName = "Z_XYZ";
    interactionSpec.setPropertyValue("Name", functionName);
    String writingTable = "MYTABLE";
    RecordFactory rf = interaction.getRecordFactory();
    MappedRecord importParams = rf.createMappedRecord("input");
    importParams.put("ATTR1", "VALUE1");
    importParams.put("ATTR2", "VALUE2");
    IFunction function = connection.getFunctionsMetaData().getFunction(functionName);
    IStructureFactory sf = interaction.retrieveStructureFactory();
    IRecordSet table = (IRecordSet) sf.getStructure(function.getParameter(writingTable).getStructure());
    table.insertRow();
    table.setString("ATNAME", "VALUE");
    table.setString("ATWRT", "VALUE");
    importParams.put(writingTable, table);
    MappedRecord output = (MappedRecord) interaction.execute(interactionSpec, importParams);
    } catch (Exception e) {
    any idea?
    than ks
    MMK

    Hi Mohan,
    Does a creation through SE37 with the same input work?
    Yoav.

  • Insert into local table as select from remote tables

    Hi all,
    In Oracle DB version 11g i have the following issue:
    I want to insert into a table in the current schema as selecting data from two remote tables. I execute the insert in portions of data. Firstly, when the target table where i want to insert is empty the Select as Insert is being executed very fast. But after every insert i made , the performance became worse than the previous one. I have no FKs or indexes in the local table/target table where i'm inserting/... I tried using /*+ append*/ hint but no success...what should be the reason of that?
    Thanks in advance,
    Alexander.

    a.stoyanov wrote:
    Hi all,
    In Oracle DB version 11g i have the following issue:
    I want to insert into a table in the current schema as selecting data from two remote tables. I execute the insert in portions of data. Firstly, when the target table where i want to insert is empty the Select as Insert is being executed very fast. But after every insert i made , the performance became worse than the previous one. I have no FKs or indexes in the local table/target table where i'm inserting/... I tried using /*+ append*/ hint but no success...what should be the reason of that?
    Thanks in advance,
    Alexander.How should we know? You don't give enough information to be able to tell. Not even the SQL involved.
    Please read {message:id=9360002} and {message:id=9360003}
    and follow the advice given.

Maybe you are looking for

  • How do you remove iTunes and other Apple products from my PC, manually?

    I just bought a $250 5th-gen iPod. But I can't install iTunes. A while back, I think I just deleted the program folder or something, or maybe the the uninstaller just somehow broke on its own. In any case, the program folder is gone and the uninstall

  • Sale Order flow to CO-PA

    Hi All, We have activated Sales Order value flow to CO-PA (COPA doc.type "A").  We also have credit management activated. When I create a sales order which has the credit status "not approved", then the order does not post any COPA document.  Once th

  • PSE 7 File Reconnect Problem

    I have a problem similar to other posts, but no solution found. I replaced my PC and now my PSE7 photos are disconnected. The photos used to be on drive C on the old computer. I moved them (outside of PSE7) to a new drive M. Reconnect will not correc

  • FCPX won't recognize .fcpproject and .fcpevent files

    I'm trying to open a project shared with me on an external hard drive in Final Cut Pro X (version 10.1). It is in the proper folder structure (Final Cut Projects and Final Cut Events in the root of the drive.) The files CurrentVersion.fcpproject and

  • Search engine widgets have go daddy "cheep" page and yahoo search come up when using widget not what you type in.

    When working with search engine widgets, press enter after making entry and you are sent to "cheepa.com" page brought to you by godaddy. Also seach is by yahoo search. How do you get rid of this page.