Inspection lot without any financial entries

Hello experts ,
Whenever we are receiving the GR from procurement and Production , the stocks are valuated as it is having financial entrees.
Is their any way in QM, we can make the valuation during  the UD,  the inspection lot contains the material document and the UD have the financial document ?
Thanks,
Nic

Hi,
This is an FI-MM integration issue actually. The account determination behind movement types can be customized so as to decide which account will be debited or credited. What you need to do is to postpone what is being done in movement 101 to 321. If accounts should definitely work with first goods receipt, a temporary account can be determined until the UD is made. You'd better discuss this with FI responsibles.
Regards.

Similar Messages

  • Inspection Lot without task list

    Dear experts,
    I've this problem:
    I've create an inspection lot without task list.
    If I try to assing a task list the system give me the message "No inspection plan could be found".
    But in transaction QP02 I've seen that the inspection plan exists and the material is assinged to the insepction plan correctly.
    Where's the error?

    Most of the issues for a plan not being assigned have been raised here already.  I suggest you rereview the value in QA02 to see what usage the lot is looking for.  Than change the key date to one day after the date the inspection plan was created and assigned to the material.
    Once you have double checked all the above, go to QA02 and click on the button to assign the specifications/plan and see if the lot is updated.
    If not, please tell us:
    1) what is the inspection type and origin for this lot.
    2) what are that statuses of the lot at this time.
    That might help us.
    FF

  • Inspection lot without batch no.

    Hi
    For 03 inspection type, inspection lot is creating without batch number, while doing UD it is asking for batch number.
    Client will give the batch number only at GR. Im unable to clear the lot.
    Please advise, how to create a inspection lot without batch number or clear the lot without batch number.
    Note: I used freely defined inspection points for 03 lot.
    Thanks&
    Regards
    Janardhanan

    Hi
    You need to apply SAP Note 146945 - Making usage decision for production lots w/o batch.
    Also with the above note, you need to mentain the below setting,
    In recipe
    Recipe header> Quality Management> Partial lot assign: Partial lot not supported
    Select Operation with QM active, go to details> Insp. point completion: Valuation
    Thanks
    Sachin

  • Inspection Lot without material

    Hi All,
    I need to create inspection lot without reference to material if it is possible then please let me know what are the setting I need to do.
    With Regards,
    Kamal Rai

    Hi,
    I dont think it is possible to create a Inspection lot without a material. The sole purpose of quality Inspection is to record the qualtiy parameters of some kind of material.
    Hi guru's please correct me if I am wrong.
    Navin

  • Goods Receipts & Issues without any financial impact - (No accounting Docs)

    Hi Experts,
    We have this new scenario to manage some goods which we do not own or manufacture in any of our plants, but only store them in our warehouse for another Company and release them upon a shipment notification from them to one of our common customers. Furthermore our own products against this customers' orders are combined with the non-owned pruducts and shipped as a strategy to cut freight & extra transit cost.
    We intend to have visibilty over these non-owned products but do not want it to have any financial impact in our system as we Receive and Issue them in and out of inventory.
    I have been thinking of consignment, subcontracting etc. but will like to get more ideas on how to do this.
    Your ideas will be appreciated.
    Thx,
    LAN.

    there is no corresponding goods issue movement to a 501 receipt.
    you can issue with any suitable goods issue movement, like goods issue to cost center 201, or goods issue to scrap 551, or 601 goods issue to outbound delivery.
    Hi Jurgen,
    As there is no direct matching GI for 501 receipts other relevant GI Mvt types could be used but in my case I get errors when trying 201-  (Update control of Movement Type is incorrect (entry 201_X_L) msg. # M7226). I have tried to create a new Mvt. Type copying from 201, but the system defaults the Mvt. Indicator field and won't let me add an L on the new custom type.
    When I tried 601 it also refereced the cost & profit centers associated with the plant in the material documents and we do not want any financial relevancy here. Could you suggest a Mvt. Type that could be ideal here.
    Thanks,
    LN.

  • Cancel 101 movement with Inspection lot of closed financial period

    Hi experts,
    we are having the following problem.
    We have a 101 movement with creation of Inspection lot, which was done in a finance period which is already closed.
    Now I have to cancel this movement, but I get the error M7021 with VOR, which means that I am not allowed to cancel it, because of the period is already closed.
    But we also can not open the period.
    Which possibilities do I have?
    Maybe MI10 movement?
    Kind regards

    Hello Jürgen,
    thank you for your help.
    I am confused now.
    Becasue normally I am logged on in german and now I did check the english one.
    Deficit of BA St. in QI prev. 127 M2 : "material number" 0001 "sloc" "batch"
    But here I get QI prev, but in the F1 help there is no QI or prev.
    In german I get VOR and there in the F1 help it is written, that VOR is previous period (so I think equal to PR in english).
    Now I am a bit confused.
    But anyway, the thing is that we have to empty the stock.
    Kind regards for every help, I think there is no possibility to cancel that booking as the period is closed.
    @ Biju K, to be honest your way would really be the only correct way, but at the current situation it is a bit special.
    I will do a MI10 booking.

  • Final Entry marked without any service entry

    Dear Gurus,
    I have a service PO with 2 line item, and same service number.
    Service entry for the first line item has been successfully created, however when I try to create the SES for the 2nd line item I get the error "Not possible to enter services ("final entry" indicator set)".
    There is no PO history for this line item. In EKPO table the Delivery completed indicator has been marked, but since delivery completed indicator field is not active in Service PO, hence this indicator has not been set manually.
    Can someone please explain this behaviour, as there is not servcie entry sheet against this line item in PO, I cannot revoke the acceptance and reset the Final entry indicator.
    Please share your thoughts.
    Regards
    Vinay

    Hi Rajendra,
    If I had selectedFinal entry then, atleast Purchase Order history would have been updated with th Service entry number. But there is no Purchase Order history for this line item.
    Also I can see the Delivery completed indicator marked in EKPO table for this line item.
    Please advise.
    regards
    Vinay

  • Inspection Lot + Notification List

    Hi there,
    I'm a "superuser" in a company that is trying to create a useful "vendor quality list".
    It's quite annoying that the inspection lots and notification are so separated as they are today.
    In QA33 you can get the inspection lots precision (for example 95 % approved inspection lots)
    In different QM1X you can get notification info regarding header, defects and cause.
    But where is the complete list - without exporting data to excel and spend time there..??
    I have tried to connect tables in SQVI but it doesn't work completely.
    I want a list showing:
    Vendor - Material - Batch No - inspection lot - UD Decision - UD Date - Notification No (if any) - Notification Header (if any) - Defect (if any) - Cause (if any)
    Any suggestions anyone? This cannot be a unique requirement for my company.
    Greatful for any help.

    Thanks SujitSND  and Rene for your answers!
    Rene, i have connected inspection lot with Notification Header without problem, but the problem starts when you continue to connect Defects (QMFE) and Cause (QMUR) tables as well.
    Instantly when you connect QMFE you cannot "lefter outer join" and you cannot see the approved inspection lots without any notification connection (only shows 124 and 125 in example below).
    I want my SQVI list to show me the following:
    Insp lot 123 - UD approved
    Insp lot 124 - UD rejected - Notification 234 - Notification header - Defect 12 - Cause 13
    Insp lot 125 - UD rejected - Notification 235 - Notification header - Defect 13 - Cause 13
    Insp lot 126 - UD approved
    Insp lot 127 - UD approved
    If you have the correct sollution for this issue i am very interesting to hear it!

  • Creation of Inspection Lot in QM Module without inspection lot origin

    I want a solution regarding creation of inspection lot without assigning inspection lot origin to material code.
    We have developed function which creates inspection lot for the material against which PDI is envisaged on the material of a particular Purchase order. In my view we do not require assigning inspection lot origin on the material code as process has been mapped through Qinfo record. By assigning the inspection lot origin on the material is unnecessary step in our process.
    Can any body suggest solution regarding above problem.
    Yatindra Bahuguna

    Dear,
    We have developed function which creates inspection lot for the material against which PDI is envisaged on the material of a particular Purchase order.
    Little bit stuck up.... can you explain the above in detail...
    As I understood you developed a function -
                         - Which creates material inspection lot
                                             - Which Pre Delivery Inspection applicable on particular purchase order.
    YES?
    Regards,
    Syed Hussain.

  • Inspection Char without Inspection lot generation

    Hi
    We are trying to model a customer requirement in PP for which a few production steps have a few characteristics to be monitored (status checked); for example - in a process of "spraying fertilizer", qty of 4 fertilizers have to be noted in the operation. Now these cannot be included in the BOM for some costing issues. We are apportioning the cost using an internal order in FI.
    Can these be modelled in PP as inspection char. for which values (readings) have to be noted without generation of inspection lot?
    Any ideas?
    Deepak

    Hi Deepak,
    One thing you need to clear is that without inspection lot generation you cannot record the values. Instead, you can create the inprocess inspection lot which does`nt effect the actual production, you can record results such as quantity etc.. for each operation for ur reference.
    The secong thing you can do is select any field or the text box that you are not usingit currently in the confirmation and enter the characteristics in that field.
    Final option is to create a document and save it with reference to ur order no. , bom etc..
    Reward if cleared and close the thread.

  • Inspection Lot for Material Group (without Material Code)

    Hello,
    We need to create Inspection Lots (either manually or automatically while Goods Receipt) without particular material reference. Scenario is that Vendors send the materials (as text, through some material group) and we need to inspect these materials.
    How is this possible?
    Puneet

    I hope you can also proceed in the following way:
    When a sample is received, create Notification and thru the Action Box Item you can create an Inspection Lot without Material Number as we normally do in case of Stability Studies...Please explore this option as well.
    Best Regards,
    K. Raghavendra Nayak

  • BAPI for Creation of inspection lot

    I have two scenario:-
    1.Can any body help to find BAPI for creation of Inspection lot for the material under PO envisaged for PDI.
    2. Can any body find me a BAPI or FM which can creates inspection lot in QALS table without inspection lot origin under 01 i.e. 0101 or Z01SI01.
    My objective is to creation inspection lot without assigning Inspection type of Z01SI01 or Z01SI02 and so on in the material code under a respective Plant 1004 or 1005 0r 1006 so on.
    In my Z Development for creation of inspection lot BDC is run for QA01 as this code created inspection lot on when material code has inspection type Z01SI01 i.e. location of source inspection and vendr code particular classification under 010 vendor class inspection type Z01SI01. System search both the inspection type for both material and vendor then create inspection lot in QALS table by assiging inspection matching inspection on the lot.
    I want to get rid of assignment of inspection on the materilal. If any BAPI or FM is avalable for creation of inspection without assigning inspection type on material code. I want to create inspection lot in which Inpsection type assignment can be done based on vendor class only.
    YPB

    2. Can any body find me a BAPI or FM which can creates inspection lot in QALS table without inspection lot origin under 01 i.e. 0101 or Z01SI01.
    I am very sure that this is not possible.You can not create inspection lot without inspection lot origin or inspection type.
    Regards
    Sujit

  • Inspection Lot with Zero stock posting qty

    Dear QM Consultants,
    We have come across following scenario,
    1.     Repetitive manufacturing
    2.     Material has inspection type 04 and Z04. Preferred inspection type is not ticked. Z04 inspection type has been assigned to inspection lot 04.
    3.     Production GR done by 131 movement
    4.     Inspection lot generated with reference to 131 movement type. Lot for inspection type 04 is created.
    5.     Inspection lot qty in QA32 it shows correctly as that of GR qty.
    6.     But when we click on UD, in stock posting tab, qty to be posted it shows as ZERO. So no qty is available for stock posting.
    Has anybody came across such scenario? Is this any bug? Any SAP note for this?
    Best Regards,
    Anand Rao

    Dear Sujit, Thanks for so prompt reply,
    Basically this is a complex case,
    1.     See we have set Posting Proposal in Usage Decision as u2018To unrestricted useu2019 in selected sets for usage decision. That means we need not every time go to stock posting tab. The moment we select ACC UD code it automatically posts the stock to unrestricted use.
    2.     Now, what has happed, by 131 movement declaration, backflush happened with 261 movement for child parts.
    3.     Inspection lots with inspection type 04 were created. (Here we did not note whether the stock was posted in quality inspection or in unrestricted use)
    4.     Now the requirement is to cancel 131 movement document. Kindly note UD were not given up to this moment.
    5.     Now through MFBF, user did document specific reversal. As a result of which and as per my knowledge 132 movement should happen and 262 should also happen. At the same time inspection lot status should be set to LTCA. But in actual case 132 movement happened and 262 did not. Surprisingly inspection lot did not set to LTCA status. It remained in REL mode only.
    6.     After this document specific reversal, user gave UD to these inspection lots without noticing where the stock was lying.(in unrestricted or in quality inspection). So the lot status set to UD   ICCO SPCO STUP after giving usage decision.
    7.     Now while doing reverse engineering that why 262 movement did not happen, we came to know that no 321 movement happened for the inspection lots which were generated with reference 131 movement document
    8.     Also, qty to be posted it shows ZERO as explained in my earlier post.
    9.     When we display 132 movement document through MIGO, in where tab it shows stock type as Quality inspection. That means stock was lifted from QI for 132 movement.
    In short  it cannot be predicted where the stock was actually posted whether in QI or in unrestricted use. But yes the post to inspection stock tick has been ticked in material master.
    Can you help further in this regard?
    Best Regards
    Anand Rao

  • FM to change an inspection lot

    Hi folks,
    when inspection lot is created i have no information about the batch. so SAP creates the inspection lot without the batch information and sets the state CHER. unfortunately you can't fill in results to an inspection lot with state CHER.
    Now i need some functionality to tell the inspection lot the batch it concerns before using "BAPI_INSPCHAR_SETRESULT".
    Any ideas?
    thx martin

    Hi Martin,
    Check FM CO_QM_INSPECTION_LOT_UPDATE
    Thanks
    Lakshman

  • Archiving Inspection lots

    Hi,
    i am usging Archiving Object QM_CONTROL.
    i want to Archive selected Inspection lots like 140000000001 to 140000001000.
    in my maintain variant
    i am giving input
    Plant : 1000
    Selection Profile : SAPQL01
    Inspection Lots  : 140000000001 to 140000001000
    its not reading any Inspection lots, Usage decision records and selected inspection lots.
    can any one give the process to Archive the Selected Inspection lots using Archiving Object QM_CONTROL.
    Regards,
    murali

    Hi Murali,
    Check note 1002056 whether it helps.
    Have you tried archiving with just the inspection lot range without the selection profile? also have you maintained proper residence times for inspection lots and performed the pre-processing run before running the archive run?
    Thanks,
    Naveen

Maybe you are looking for

  • Even with a new hard drive and fresh install, it won't boot

    Here's my story. On Wednesday last week, we had a power outage. (Yes, I had a surge protector. It didn't matter.) The next morning, when I turned my iMac on, it wouldn't boot. It got to the startup icon, but it just spun forever. I restarted and ran

  • Z10 video out questions hopefully someone knows.

    before I start buying adapter I figured I would ask. Z10 seems like it could be handy for video out document sharing at meetings however 95% of all projectors we come across are vga . anyone tried this. Would you need a micro hdmi to vga adapter with

  • Personal Domain URL & Publishing via iWeb

    I don't have any problems with setting up a personal domain. (In fact, it was quite easy!) My question and issue is this: when I publish to my personal domain, iWeb wants to put the site I created into a subfolder of the root domain. For exmaple: I w

  • How much room does Time Machine take

    I have a Macbook Pro with 120GB HD. I wanted to know how big of an external HD I need for Time Machine. I also want to know if I can use it as a HD for large files (imovies) and have that separate from the Time Machine application.

  • Cant see album art in my iphone4 ipod player

    hello... i m using 4.2 ios in my iphone 4 i have added song in my iphone using itunes 10 version but when i play song in ipod player it does not show album art and the same song when i play in my laptop in window media player it shows album art then