Install last patch maxdb 7.6.06.05

Hello,
I want to install the last patch 7.06.06.05
which is the difference between :
MAXDB 7.6.06.05 Server Package
MAXDB 7.6.06.05 Application Runtime Package
MAXDB 7.6.06.05 Web Services Package
do I have to download and install the 3?
Thank you
Best Regards
Frédéric Blaise
e-Kenz S.A.

Hello Frédéric Blaise,
1)Are you SAP customer?
2) "which is the difference between :
MAXDB 7.6.06.05 Server Package
MAXDB 7.6.06.05 Application Runtime Package
MAXDB 7.6.06.05 Web Services Package "
"MAXDB 7.6.06.05 Server Package" has Server and client software Components
of the OLTP database system;
"MAXDB 7.6.06.05 Application Runtime Package" has only Client software for the SAP application server;
"MAXDB 7.6.06.05 Web Services Package" has Web Tools Software Components;
In more details please see SAP MaxDB Library 7.6 sections installation profiles & software components
at
http://maxdb.sap.com/doc/7_6/default.htm -> Installation -> Installation Manual
3) If the database and application running on the same server, you need "MAXDB 7.6.06.05 Server Package" to update the database to the version 7.6.06.05. The MAXDB client software will be updated on this server during the database upgrade, if it has lower as 7.6.06.05 version .
Thank you and best regards, Natalia Khlopina

Similar Messages

Mini won't reboot after last patch install.

I was installing the patch yesterday and during the patch install it said there was a problem with the install. After that the computer was running slow so I decided to reboot. Now all I can get is the circle of sticks with the apple logo but I never get beyond that.
I can eject a CD by holding the mouse button.
I press C while the install disc is in but it never re-installs
All my data is on an external USB drive so I don't mind reinstalling but I'd like to be able to do so without paying someone at the apple store to do it.
Also tried holding the option key.. nothing
tried the open firmware combination.. nothing
What else can I do?

Hi Fastfwd, and a warm welcome to the forums!
Tough without the Install disc working, but some things to try...
Mini PMU reset...
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT2183
Does it boot to Single User Mode, CMD+s keys at bootup, if so try...
/sbin/fsck -fy
Repeat until it shows no errors fixed.
(Space between fsck AND -fy important).
Resolve startup issues and perform disk maintenance with Disk Utility and fsck...
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=106214
Tough without the Tiger Disk problems, but try fsck...
To use fsck, you must run it from the command line. Unlike using your mouse to open an application to do something, you'll need to type a text command at the prompt (#) to tell fsck what to do. The Terminal application (/Applications/Utilities) and single-user mode are two examples of command-line interfaces in which you can type such commands. To use fsck:
1. Start up your computer in single-user mode to reach the command line. Hold CMD+s keys down at bootup. Note: If necessary, perform a forced restart as described in the Emergency Troubleshooting Handbook that came with your computer. On desktop computers, you can do this by pressing the reset/interrupt button (if there is one) or holding down the power button for several seconds. On portable computers, simultaneously press the Command-Control-power keys. If your portable computer doesn't restart with this method, you may need to reset the Power Manager.
2. At the command-line prompt, type /sbin/fsck -fy
(SPACE between fsck AND -fy important)
3. Press Return. fsck will go through five "phases" and then return information about your disk's use and fragmentation. Once it finishes, it'll display this message if no issue is found: 
The volume (nameofvolume) appears to be OK  If fsck found issues and has altered, repaired, or fixed anything, it will display this message: *** FILE SYSTEM WAS MODIFIED ***   Important: If this message appears, repeat the fsck command you typed in step 2 until fsck tells you that your volume appears to be OK (first-pass repairs may uncover additional issues, so this is a normal thing to do).
4. When fsck reports that your volume is OK, type reboot at the prompt and then press Return.
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=106214
Then Safe Boot, (holding Shift key down at bootup), & use Disk Utility from there to Repair Permissions, reboot once more.
Then Safe Boot from the HD, (holding Shift key down at bootup), run Disk Utility in Applications>Utilities, then highlight your drive, click on Repair Permissions, reboot when it completes.
Do you have another 10.4.x Mac around?
How to use FireWire target disk mode...
http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=58583

Again after last patch: Windows 64 - PDF preview handler not working

Adobe's PDF preview handler doesn't work unter Windows XP/Vista/7 64 bit. Because of that PDF preview e.g. in Windows explorer or MS Outlook isn't displaying PDF preview.
This issue has been discussed in this forum some months ago, and this page gives a solution that has helped:
http://www.pretentiousname.com/adobe_pdf_x64_fix/index.html#fixer
Instead of fixing this well-known issue with the last patch Adobe decided again not to fix. And after installing the patch you have to repair PDF preview handler again...
Friendly
Philipp
Philipp
http://ferienbretagne.livejournal.com
Lenovo W500, 2,8 Ghz T9600, 8GB RAM, Windows 7 Pro 64-Bit, Acrobat 9

Hi Sree,
According to your description, your case related to Adobe PDF Preview Handler. This is third-party product. I am afraid this is out of our support. Please ask in their special forum
https://forums.adobe.com/community/adobe_reader_forums
By the way, after do some search, it seems not working for 64bit machine,
>> It is working fine in Windows 7 and Vista
Also work fine in win7/vista 64bit????
If your scenario is not working in 64bit machine, try to put "adobe pdf preview handler 64-bit fix" in search engine. Good luck.
Have a nice day!
Kristin
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

Outlook 2013 since last patch (Dec 2014) gives error: System Administrator - Undeliverable

After installing the latest round of patches from Microsoft in our environment, we have had numerous users having this issue. When sending an email, internally or externally, they get the following message.
Your message did not reach some or all of the intended recipients.
From: System Administrator
Subject: Undeliverable: Email Subject
      Subject: Email Subject
      Sent: 12/16/2014 9:21 AM
The following recipient(s) cannot be reached:
Person#1 on 12/16/2014 9:21 AM
            This message could not be sent. Try sending the message again later, or contact your network administrator. Error is [0x80004005-00000000-00000000].
The problem is sporadic and sometimes just closing Outlook and reopening it will fix the problem. The problem does happen both when the users are in the office and when they are out. There isn't any pattern that we can identify. It
happened to me once and a reboot resolved it for me. We thought that maybe a specific patch that was installed just needed another reboot but we still have other users that are having the problem even after numerous reboots.
A little more about our environment:
Exchange 2010, fully patched with all service packs and updates (single server)
Running on a Windows 2008R2 server with all service packs and updates
Outlook 2013 with all updates installed
Happening on both Windows 8.1 (fully updated) and Windows 7 (fully updated)
Again this just started happening after the last patch cycle and we have never had this situation occur prior to that.
Steve Eason, MCSE FM:Systems

If you installed Exchange 2010 SP3 RU8 then you need to update to the 2nd revision of that update, as the first one had that very issue.
Update 12/12/2014:
Exchange Server 2010 SP3 Update Rollup 8 has been re-released to the Microsoft download center resolving a regression discovered in the initial release. The update RU8 package corrects the issue which impacted users connecting to Exchange from Outlook. The
issue was insulated to the MAPI RPC layer and was able to be isolated to quickly deliver the updated RU8 package. The updated RU8 package is version number 14.03.0224.002 if you need to confirm you have the updated package. The updates for Exchange Server
2013 and 2007 were not impacted by this regression and have not been updated.
Update 12/10/2014:
An issue has been identified in the Exchange Server 2010 SP3 Update Rollup 8. The update has been recalled and is no longer available on the download center pending a new RU8 release. Customers should not proceed with deployments of this update
until the new RU8 version is made available. Customers who have already started deployment of RU8 should rollback this update.
The issue impacts the ability of Outlook to connect to Exchange, thus we are taking the action to recall the RU8 to resolve this problem. We will deliver a revised RU8 package as soon as the issue can be isolated, corrected, and validated. We will
publish further updates to this blog post regarding RU8.
This issue only impacts the Exchange Server 2010 SP3 RU8 update, the other updates remain valid and customers can continue with deployment of these packages.
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=45225
DJ Grijalva | MCITP: EMA 2007/2010 SPA 2010 | www.persistentcerebro.com

Error: ' The Update could not be installed (patch apply failed)' . It keeps trying to install this patch but my version is the latest one!!

I have the latest version of firefox. I know this because your website says so. But for some reason, my current firefox keeps trying to install a new version by "trying" to install a patch. But it fails every time.
I cant say exactly when this started. A few weeks ago, firefox was behaving erratically (crashing for no reason at every launch due to some video plugin fail) but i uninstalled and reinstalled (a few times) and it was fine after the last one.

If files already have been downloaded then remove the files in the updates and updates\0 folder.
You can also delete the active-update.xml file.
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Updates_reported_when_running_newest_version
Software Update not working properly:
*http://kb.mozillazine.org/Software_Update
* C:\Users\<user>\AppData\Local\Mozilla\Firefox\Mozilla Firefox\updates

Windows 7 unable to connect to mobile hotspot after last patch

Hi,
I recently re-installed the Windows 7 on my laptop. I applied a lot of patches.
I have two phones: one blackberry curve and an android Samsung Galaxy Nexus.
Since yesterday I was able to start the tethering on the smartphone and activate the mobile hotspot. Windows 7 was able to connect to the mobile hotspot without any problem.
Yesterday evening I applied the last patches and this morning I restarted the PC to applied them.
Now Windows is not more able to connect to any mobile hotspot. However, is still able to connect to a standard Cisco WiFi network.
Does anybody have any idea why?
Thanks

Since issue only occurred after you installed the last patches, in addition to the wifi driver, I also suggest you uninstall the latest patches for a test, seems something conflits with them, what is the result?
Regards
Yolanda
TechNet Community Support

Unknown Error (-53) after last "Patch Tuesday"

I'm unable to sync my iPod Touch since the day after last "Patch Tuesday". I get an alert referencing an "unknown error (-53)" every time I try to sync. I've tried the usual windows steps; uninstall and reinstall, reboot multiple times, disable all anti-virus, anti-spam, firewall, curse, pray, etc. I've done a search here and Googled but haven't seen any discussions.
Is anybody else having this problem or is it just another windows anomaly requiring a format and clean install?

thokra wrote:
Experience the same problem after installing the latest update and cant do anything now.
Have someone with a PC running Windows XP download the shuffle Reset Utility and apply it to your shuffle.

About last patch

hi,
Where to get the latest patch download for forms 6i (win)?
It's possible to install only the last patch or some problems occurs?
Thanks in advance
Guglielmo

You can download patch 16 from metalink. The patches are cumulative, so you can install it straight over the 6i rel 2 distribution.

How to install a patch in oracle apps

Hi,
Please provide me the steps to install a patch in oracle apps(unix platform)

Welcome to the forums !
Pl post EBS questiosn in the EBS forms http://forums.oracle.com/forums/category.jspa?categoryID=3
Pl see these MOS Docs for answers to your question -
130608.1 - adpatch Basics
174436.1 - Oracle Applications Patching FAQ
HTH
Srini

How to install a patch from local JAR file...

Newbie question -
I'm getting an error when deploying an MDB on WL 10.0 - someone else had also come across that same error and he sent me a patch (CR326377_10GA.jar) that should fix it.
How do I install that patch on my local WinXP installation of WL - do I just add an entry to the CLASSPATH of the startweblogic.bat file? I'm a little concenred about the order of JARs there... is there a better way?!
I tried looking up this patch using the Smart Update utility - but I could not find it there - how do I do it manually?
thanks,
james
Edited by jdepaul at 03/20/2008 4:13 PM

I believe you can contact support and get a patch id and passcode for this
patch and then install using smart update.
StartWeblogic.cmd will also look for a weblogic_patch.jar in the patch
directory. I.e. something like
d:\BEA10\patch_wls100\profiles\default\sys_manifest_classpath\weblogic_patch.jar
Cut/paste the directory from the output of startweblogic.cmd and then create
the directory and copy the patch to the right filename.
Or you can put the patch before any other jars in the classpath.
Peter
<James DePaul> wrote in message news:[email protected]..
Newbie question -
I'm getting an error when deploying an MDB on WL 10.0 - someone else had
also come across that same error and he sent me a patch (CR326377_10GA.jar)
that should fix it.
How do I install that patch on my local WinXP installation of WL - do I just
add an entry to the CLASSPATH of the startweblogic.bat file? I'm a little
concenred about the order of JARs there... is there a better way?!
I tried looking up this patch using the Smart Update utility - but I could
not find it there - how do I do it manually?
thanks,
james
Edited by jdepaul at 03/20/2008 4:13 PM

Error while installing a patch for Mainwin 5.0.2 on Solaris 2.8

Hi,
I am relatively new in this field, so i apologise for any slip-ups.
We use a Solaris 2.8-SPARC server. I was given an external drive which contained the porting software Visual Mainwin 5.0.2 and was told to install it from the drive. On checking it, i found that the entire folder structure of the software was damaged, i.e. every file of the software was changed to uppercase. UNIX being highly case-sensitive, i manually changed each and every file present in the software directory to lowercase and then ran it.
The software ran fine, it got installed and the license server was also up. the licenses were also nicely distributed. everything was fine until i was asked to install the patch 'vmw502_sunos5_HF1.sh'. While installing i got the following output :
# sh vmw502_sunos5_HF*
Extracting installation package to "/tmp/mwspselfextr27624".
Please stand by ... Done.
=====================================================================
Visual MainWin Patch Installation
HF1 for VMW 5.0.2 <sunos5> 24-Jul-2003.14:01 Cycle115
=====================================================================
***Error: cannot find file
/export/home/tools/solaris/env/mainsoft/../mwver/mwversion.ini
Something wrong with your Visual MainWin installation - aborting
when i checked the installation directory, i found that the file 'mwversion.ini' was present inside the directory 'mwver'. I cant see any reason why the patch is not recognizing the file.
Can anybody help?? Any kind of help will really be appreciated.
-SD

Hope you already tried: ls -l /export/home/tools/solaris/env/mainsoft/../mwver/mwversion.ini If ls returns the file name, try running the script under truss to find some clues.
% truss -f -vall -rall -wall -o /tmp/mwpatch.log sh vmw502_sunos5_HF*

Unable to deploy BPEL Process -- Says If you have installed a patch to the

I have a simple BPEL process that calles an ESB flow deployed in the same server.
I am facing the following issue when trying to deploy the BPEL process.
The ESB flow is deployed and is working perfectly.
Configuration:
JDeveloper 10.1.3.5
SOA Suite 10g Release 3
Downloaded from:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/middleware/ias/downloads/index.html
Here I downloaded this file:
http://download.oracle.com/otn/nt/ias/101310/soa_windows_x86_101310_disk1.zip
When I compile the BPEL project, it compiles fine:
Compiling...
Compiling C:\JDeveloper\10gMywork\OrderProcessingApp\OrderDistributionProcess\bpel\OrderDistributionProcess.bpel
*[BPEL Compiler] Initializing compiler for first time use...*
BPEL suitcase generated in: C:\JDeveloper\10gMywork\OrderProcessingApp\OrderDistributionProcess\output\bpel_OrderDistributionProcess_v2011_09_01__39889.jar
copying bpel/OrderDistributionProcess.wsdl to output directory
copying bpel/OrderSystem_OrderSearchService_RSRef.wsdl to output directory
converting, through native2ascii, build.properties to output directory
*[11:05:04 AM] Successful compilation: 0 errors, 0 warnings.*
Now when I choose (Right Click on Project) -> Deploy -> BPEL Process Deployer,
I get this error:
Buildfile: C:\JDeveloper\10gMywork\OrderProcessingApp\OrderDistributionProcess\build.xml
[java] Java Result: 1
validateTask:
[echo]
| Validating workflow
[validateTask] Validation of workflow task definitions is completed without errors
deployProcess:
[echo]
| Deploying bpel process OrderDistributionProcess on localhost, port 8888
[deployProcess] Deploying process C:\JDeveloper\10gMywork\OrderProcessingApp\OrderDistributionProcess\output\bpel_OrderDistributionProcess_1.0.jar
BUILD FAILED
C:\JDeveloper\10gMywork\OrderProcessingApp\OrderDistributionProcess\build.xml:78: A problem occured while connecting to server "localhost" using port "8888": bpel_OrderDistributionProcess_1.0.jar failed to deploy. Exception message is: ORABPEL-05215
Error while loading process.
The process domain encountered the following errors while loading the process "OrderDistributionProcess" (revision "1.0"): null.
If you have installed a patch to the server, please check that the bpelcClasspath domain property includes the patch classes.at com.collaxa.cube.engine.deployment.CubeProcessHolder.bind(CubeProcessHolder.java:285)
at com.collaxa.cube.engine.deployment.DeploymentManager.deployProcess(DeploymentManager.java:804)
at com.collaxa.cube.engine.deployment.DeploymentManager.deploySuitcase(DeploymentManager.java:670)
at com.collaxa.cube.ejb.impl.BPELDomainManagerBean.deploySuitcase(BPELDomainManagerBean.java:445)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.joinpoint.EJBJoinPointImpl.invoke(EJBJoinPointImpl.java:35)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.InvocationContextImpl.proceed(InvocationContextImpl.java:119)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.system.DMSInterceptor.invoke(DMSInterceptor.java:52)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.InvocationContextImpl.proceed(InvocationContextImpl.java:119)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.system.JAASInterceptor$1.run(JAASInterceptor.java:31)
at com.evermind.server.ThreadState.runAs(ThreadState.java:620)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.system.JAASInterceptor.invoke(JAASInterceptor.java:34)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.InvocationContextImpl.proceed(InvocationContextImpl.java:119)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.system.TxRequiredInterceptor.invoke(TxRequiredInterceptor.java:50)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.InvocationContextImpl.proceed(InvocationContextImpl.java:119)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.system.DMSInterceptor.invoke(DMSInterceptor.java:52)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.interceptor.InvocationContextImpl.proceed(InvocationContextImpl.java:119)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.InvocationContextPool.invoke(InvocationContextPool.java:55)
at com.evermind.server.ejb.StatelessSessionEJBObject.OC4J_invokeMethod(StatelessSessionEJBObject.java:87)
at DomainManagerBean_RemoteProxy_4bin6i8.deploySuitcase(Unknown Source)
at com.oracle.bpel.client.BPELDomainHandle.deploySuitcase(BPELDomainHandle.java:317)
at com.oracle.bpel.client.BPELDomainHandle.deployProcess(BPELDomainHandle.java:339)
at deployHttpClientProcess.jspService(_deployHttpClientProcess.java:376)
at com.orionserver.http.OrionHttpJspPage.service(OrionHttpJspPage.java:59)
at oracle.jsp.runtimev2.JspPageTable.service(JspPageTable.java:453)
at oracle.jsp.runtimev2.JspServlet.internalService(JspServlet.java:591)
at oracle.jsp.runtimev2.JspServlet.service(JspServlet.java:515)
at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:856)
at com.evermind.server.http.ResourceFilterChain.doFilter(ResourceFilterChain.java:64)
at oracle.security.jazn.oc4j.JAZNFilter$1.run(JAZNFilter.java:396)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at javax.security.auth.Subject.doAsPrivileged(Subject.java:517)
at oracle.security.jazn.oc4j.JAZNFilter.doFilter(JAZNFilter.java:410)
at com.evermind.server.http.ServletRequestDispatcher.invoke(ServletRequestDispatcher.java:621)
at com.evermind.server.http.ServletRequestDispatcher.forwardInternal(ServletRequestDispatcher.java:368)
at com.evermind.server.http.HttpRequestHandler.doProcessRequest(HttpRequestHandler.java:866)
at com.evermind.server.http.HttpRequestHandler.processRequest(HttpRequestHandler.java:448)
at com.evermind.server.http.HttpRequestHandler.serveOneRequest(HttpRequestHandler.java:216)
at com.evermind.server.http.HttpRequestHandler.run(HttpRequestHandler.java:117)
at com.evermind.server.http.HttpRequestHandler.run(HttpRequestHandler.java:110)
at oracle.oc4j.network.ServerSocketReadHandler$SafeRunnable.run(ServerSocketReadHandler.java:260)
at oracle.oc4j.network.ServerSocketAcceptHandler.procClientSocket(ServerSocketAcceptHandler.java:239)
at oracle.oc4j.network.ServerSocketAcceptHandler.access$700(ServerSocketAcceptHandler.java:34)
at oracle.oc4j.network.ServerSocketAcceptHandler$AcceptHandlerHorse.run(ServerSocketAcceptHandler.java:880)
at com.evermind.util.ReleasableResourcePooledExecutor$MyWorker.run(ReleasableResourcePooledExecutor.java:303)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
Total time: 6 seconds
I checked the host port, i.e., 8888 here, from JDeveloper; and it says that the tests passed.
Help me please.

Balu,
it seems you are trying to deploy example for B2B. Please check your B2B is up, AQ are up and accessible and you can also check your SOA dehydration DB .
You can check some setup and dexample at: http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/integration/b2b/pdf/B2B_TU_001_B2B_BPEL.pdf
-JMehta

I have install last update for i pod(ios5) but during installation there was one problem....i have restore my ipod and now i have lost all my buyed music!!Is not possible download it....?What are the details, including any error messages, related to your

I have install last update for i pod(ios5) but during installation there was one problem....i have restore my ipod and now i have lost all my buyed music!!Is not possible download it....?What are the details, including any error messages, related to your question?

Have you not got the music on your computer and/or on backups on, for example, external drives or CDs/DVDs ?

Dynamic file name - Components to be installed in patch required for SP12

Dear All ,
1)Plz let me know what is the prerequisites for installing SP12 Patch in XI i.e <b>what all components do I need to install for this</b> . Currently I am using SP 09 and I am facing problem related to Dynamic file in file adapter .
2) While installing the components for this patch , is it going to affect my pre-configured scenarios .
Thanks in advance
Prabhat

Hi Danny!
So you are saying that this is a valid path specification in Windows? I did not know this. And I do not remember to ever have seen this before with Java.
Is there a reason why this "abbreviated" form is used in Java?
Has this changed recently, or did I simply never found it before?
Can this be behavior be changed to the complete path form? I like to call 'get[Absolute]Path()' in log messages and test cases, but want to see the complete path in such a case. I would like to avoid getCanonicalPath() in such cases, because this method declares an exception.
Cheers,
Michael

How to install a patch on remaining ISE servers

Hello,
I have a cluster of ISE servers in version 1.1.4. I patched it with Patch 4.
Then, I added more ISE servers in version 1.1.4. How to I patch these new servers to Patch 4 ? In the status page, it displays correctly that some servers have the patch installed while the new ones do not have it installed. But I don't find the way do install the patch on the remaining server ?
Can anyone tell me how to proceed ?
Thanks,
David

If you need to install the patch on one or more secondary nodes, ensure that the nodes are up and repeat the process from Step 1 to install the patch on the remaining nodes.
Please go through the link for the installation steps and form the page 119.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ise/1.2/user_guide/ise_ug.pdf

Install last patch maxdb 7.6.06.05

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for