Install Oracle 10.2.0.1 (32 bit) on Windows Server 2012 (64 bit)

Hello
Can I install Migrate my database 10.2.0.1 (32 bit) to Windows Server 2012 (64 bit).
I would like to install Oracle 10.2 server (32 bit ) on Windows Server 2012 (64 bit).
Thanks

It is not a supported combination (see the Certification tab in MOS) - so things may or may not work as advertised. Is there a reason to continue to use a desupported version of the database ?
HTH
Srini

Similar Messages

  • Having problem to install Oracle Portal Forms Reports and Discoverer 11g on Windows Server 2008 64 bit

    Dear All Precious Friends,
    I am having problem while installing Oracle Portal Forms Reports and Discoverer 11g on Windows Server 2008 64 bit,
    I have already installed Oracle Database 11g Release 2 -------
    ----Then i configured JAVA Access bridge
    --------then installed and configured Required Schema using Repository Creation Utility of same version of Database 11g,
    -----------then installed Oracle Business Intelligence 11g version 11.1.1.6.0 which includes Web logic..............I am feeling that i did right at this point...........
    ..............also feeling comfortable after install Oracle Identity and Access Management 11g ..................
    -----------------but don't know how to configure OID to install Oracle Portal Forms Reports and Discoverer 11g...............
    Please help my Oracle Friends
    Your early help will be highly appreciated.
    thanks and regards
    Hassan

    You said, "...+I would like to install Release 2(11.1.1.2.0)+ ...". Be careful. 11.1.1.2.0 is not Release 2. The version for Rel 2 is 11.1.2.0, notice that there is one less "1". Also, there is no way to patch from Release 1 to Release 2.
    In EDelivery, this is what you should find if you search on "Oracle Fusion Middleware" for "Microsoft Windows x64 (64-bit)":
    First look for this link then drill into it:
    Oracle Fusion Middleware 11g Media Pack for Microsoft Windows x64 (64-bit)
    In this section you will find the following:
    This is the full product installation of FMw 11 Release 2 (Forms & Reports)
    Oracle Forms and Reports 11g R2 (11.1.2.0.0) for Microsoft Windows x64 (64-bit) V28761-01
    This is the full product installation of FMw 11 Release 1 (includes Portal, Forms, Reports, and Disco)
    Oracle Portal, Forms, Reports and Discoverer 11g (11.1.1.2.0) for Microsoft Windows x86 (64-bit) (Part 1 of 4) V18785-01
    Oracle Portal, Forms, Reports and Discoverer 11g (11.1.1.2.0) for Microsoft Windows x86 (64-bit) (Part 2 of 4)
    Oracle Portal, Forms, Reports and Discoverer 11g (11.1.1.2.0) for Microsoft Windows x86 (64-bit) (Part 3 of 4)
    Oracle Portal, Forms, Reports and Discoverer 11g (11.1.1.2.0) for Microsoft Windows x86 (64-bit) (Part 4 of 4)
    This is the FMw 11 Release 1 patch set that will bring the above 11.1.1.2.0 installation to 11.1.1.6.  This is NOT a full product installation - just a patch
    Oracle Portal, Forms, Reports and Discoverer 11g Patch Set 5 (11.1.1.6.0) for Microsoft Windows x86 (64-bit) V29850-01
    There are no patch sets for Release 2 as of yet.

  • Windows 7 Enterprise 32 bit and Windows Server 2012 64 bit successful dual boot.

    Client Windows 7 Enterprise 32 bit SP1, Windows Server 2012 64 bit successfully install for dual boot. Even deleted Windows 7 Enterprise from msconfig, moved Windows Server 2012 partition, for dual boot installed Windows 8.1 64 bit (now posting from),
    deleted Windows Server 2012 from msconfig, moved Windows 8.1 partition, just for knowledge.

    Hi,
    After referring to your post, I can understand you are trying to install 32 bit and 64 bit OS on same system.  Are you trying to perform that? Here providing you thread link for detail.
    dual boot windows 32 bit and 64 bit at same pc
    Hope it helps to understand!
    Regards.

  • Unable to install Client Tools for Sybase ASE 15.7 on Windows Server 2012 64-Bit

    Hello Folks,
    I just downloaded the client tools package from https://support.sap.com/swdc --> Installation and Upgrades --> A-Z list --> SAP ADAPTIVE SERVER ENTERPRISE --> SYBASE ASE 15.7 --> Installation --> Microsoft Windows --> 51044415.zip
    I'm trying to install the client tools for a newly provisioned Windows 2012 64-Bit machine. After unzipping the folder and running autorun, the installation does not proceed. When I go to pcclient64 and run either setup.exe or setupConsole.exe, I get the error "This Application has Unexpectedly Quit, Invocation of this Java Application has caused an InvocationTargetException. This application will now exit. (LAX)". I stumbled across various posts on the forum, and it appears that the installer is not certified for Windows Server 2012. I tried using the compatibility mode for Windows 7, and it proceeds further and launches the SAP GUI; however, it closes afterwards.
    Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in advance.

    Hi,
    51044415 is a PC-Client 15.7 refresh.
    You are using a version that was not certified with Windows 2012. Get the most current version PC-Client 15.7 SP130 or SDK 15.7 SP130 or SP132.
    If your looking for PC-Client5.7 SP130 look for EBF23439
    We didn't get certified with Windows 2012 until SDK 15.7 ESD#6 even with that I reported a few minor issues.
    You need the following on the machine before the installation.
    Microsoft Visual C++ 2010 Redistributable Package (x64)
    Microsoft Visual C++ 2005 Redistributable Package (x86) (or dsedit and ocscfg will not work)
    Microsoft Visual C++ 2005 Redistributable Package (x64) (or dsedit and ocscfg will not work)
    Thanks,
    Dawn Kim

  • Does Oracle 11g 32-bit  can run on Windows Server 2012 (64 bit) ?

    Hello!
    I´ve bought Oracle 11g Standard Edition One 4 years ago, (Release 1 11.1.0.6.0 )
    and installed on a Windows Server 2008 (32-bit)
    We ara planning migrate out BD to a new server with Windows Server 2012 (64-bits)
    Can i install and use that Oracle version on the new server ?
    or
    Can i download and use the same version @ 64-bit with the licence i have with the 32-bit version?
    or
    Do i need to purchase a new Oracle version specially for 64bits?
    Thanks in advance

    Hello, me again... (sorry for insist)
    4 years ago, we purchased and use an Oracle 11g Standard Edition One Release 1 ( 11.1.0.6.0) @ 32 bits, and runs very good on a winsvr 2008 @32 bits.
    I was told i can run Oracle without problems on a WinSvr 2008 @ 64bits
    So we'd like to move it to a new server (WinSvr2012 @64bits)
    So my question is
    * Can we download and use it legally a 64 bit version, or we need to purchase another licence?
    * If so, where can i download it?
    Thanks in advance

  • Downgrade Windows server 2012 64 bit to windows server 2008 R2 32 bit

    HI,
    what I want to know is when Downgrading Windows server 2012 64 bit to windows server 2008 R2 32 bit, will there be any issues of the license? Can I use the same license of 2012 server for the new 2008 installation.

    Hi,
    Based on my experience, we cannot use the Windows Server 2012 license key to activate a Windows Server 2008 install.
    In addition, which channel the windows server 2012 was purchased through? It seems that the media and product keys to downgrade are not provided although downgrade rights are granted
    since Microsoft only supplies bits and product keys to Volume License customers and only for certain versions and editions of the software.
    I recommend you to contact the Licensing Activation Centers below for assistance:
    http://www.microsoft.com/licensing/existing-customers/activation-centers.aspx
    Best regards,
    Susie

  • Oracle 10g xe 32 bit on windows server 2008 64 bit

    I have windows server 2008 64 bit and oracle 10g xe 32 bit
    does it work on ?
    I have tested but no success.
    Any one knows reasons

    You seem to have posted threads before on very similar topics, and you also posted this once in the appropriate forum:
    {thread:id=2270082}
    Please avoid duplicating posts!
    As already stated in one of your other threads, it is not a certified combination. Again, read the Installation Guide !
    If you want to play with it and try to make it "work", that's up to you. And as you say you have already tried, with "no success", it seems you already got an answer.
    I suggest you close this thread and continue in the dedicated 10g XE forum thread (or try the 11g XE Beta - only for 32-bit Windows yet, but there's a chance the general release will be aimed for Windows x64 as well).
    Edited by: orafad on Aug 20, 2011 1:14 PM

  • Unable to install WSUS Updates KB720211 x64 and KB2734608-x64 on windows server 2012 r2 standard

    Hi,
    Am testing SCCM 2012 R2 in virtual environment. To handle Windows 8 clients, need to install KB2734608 update, which is failing.
    Not able to install WSUS Updates KB720211 x64 too. The server is on Windows Server Standard 2012 R2 x64.
    Any help will be appreciated.

    Hi,
    Agree with Michael. KB2734608 is applied to the WSUS 3.0 SP2. If we install the WSUS on Windows Server 2012 or later, the version of the WSUS becomes to v6.
    Best Regards.
    Steven Lee Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact [email protected]

  • Linked Server error: Login Failed for user 'NT AUTHORITY\ANONYMOUS LOGON' between sql server 2005 32 bit and sql server 2012 64 bit

    Hi All,
    Here the linked server is created between sql server 2012 64 bit and sql server 2005 32 bit. I am getting the below error  when i try to access linked server from third server. I have created linked from Instance 1 to Instance 2. When i access it from
    instance 3 i am getting the below error. SPN setting has been done between these 2 servers. Also the option 'Trust the delegate' is enabled for the both the service account. 
    'Login Failed for user 'NT AUTHORITY\ANONYMOUS LOGON' 
    Appreciate your quick response. 
    Vikas.M.S

    Hello,
    Please read the following resources:
    http://www.databasejournal.com/features/mssql/article.php/3696506/Setting-Up-Delegation-for-Linked-Servers.htm
    http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sqlserver/en-US/ea26de43-4c6b-4991-86d7-e1578f107c92/linked-server-login-failed-for-user-nt-authorityanonymous-logon?forum=sqldataaccess
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Alberto Morillo
    SQLCoffee.com

  • SQL Server Windows NT - 64 Bit in Windows Server 2012 R2 Standard

    Hi,
    We have started migrating our SQL Server 2005 version and Operating System 2003 to SQL Server 2012 and operating system 2012 R2 Standard.
    Before we restore the production database, we had created an empty database and tables. We ran couple of packages which were migrated to SSIS 2012 version from SSIS 2005 and those were working fine and we saw good performance compare to production server.
    Recently we have taken 2005 SQL Server database backup and restored on 2012 version. Since then we are facing performance issues on 2012 server. Below is the configuration of 2012 server
    Intel(R) Xenon(R) CPU E5-2650 v2 @2.60 GHZ 2.60 GHZ (2 processors), RAM - 32 GM and 64-Bit Operating System.
    We are using this server only for data loading from SSIS packages. We have set that this server to use MAX memory is 25 GB RAM. We have checked the memory usage of the server and seen SQL Server Windows NT - 64 bit process is taking total memory allotted
    and also taking 100% CPU utilization.
    Old Server Configuration is
    Intel(R) Xenon(TM) MP CPU 3.66 GHZ, RAM - 8 GB and 32-Bit Operating System
    Could you please let us know what was causing for the high memory utilization on our migration server and make the server for better performance?
    Attached the image of memory utilization.

    Hello,
    I would start by setting maxdop (max degree of parallelism) properly:
    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/sqlsakthi/p/maxdop-calculator-sqlserver.aspx
    Rebuilding indexes and statistics too.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Alberto Morillo
    SQLCoffee.com

  • Installing Oracle SOA suite 10.1.3.1.0 on windows server 2008-64 bit.

    Hi,
    Installing Oracle SOA suite 10.1.3.1.0 on windows server 2008-64 bit.
    Getting the following exception when installing BPEL
    oracle.as.install.util.ActionFailedException : java.io.FileNotFound Exception :
    D:\software\bpel\bpel_oc4j\install\log.properties(The system couldnot find the specified).
    at oracle.as.install.action.LogConfigAction.execution(Unknown Source)
    at oracle.as.install.util.ActionQueue.run(Unknown Source)
    at oracle.sysman.oio.oioc.OiocOneClickInstaller.main(Unknown Source)
    Caused by : java.io.FileNotFoundException : D:\software\bpel\bpel_oc4j\install\log.properties
    (The system cannot find the specified file)
    at java.io.FileInputStrem.open(Native Method)
    at java.io.FileInputStrem.<init>(Unknown Source)
    at oracle.as.install.action.LogConfigAction.execute(Unknown Source)
    at oracle.as.install.util.ActionQueue.run(Unknown Source)
    at oracle.sysman.oio.oioc.OiocOneClickInstaller.main(Unknown Source)
    In the unzipped BPEL software folder for installation there is no such file.
    Have installed several Oracle SOA suite 10.3.1.0 on windows server 2003 - 32 bit using the same software.
    But now am using it along with a patch- p6712338 for windows server 2008-64 bit.

    If this is a production instance, you should NOT read past this sentence -- contact Oracle support to do it right.
    If this is just for testing/experiments, have you tried putting an empty file at D:\software\bpel\bpel_oc4j\install\log.properties? How about putting a copy of the file from one of your "windows server 2003 - 32 bit" installations?
    Good luck, Andy

  • How to install Oracle Content Database Archive Adapter for SAP on windows

    Hi,
    I would like to install CDAA(Oracle Content Database Archive Adapter) on 32 bit and 64 bit windows. Will somebody point me to where i can download this from (if its not free i would like to try out trial version first) . If it depends upon other oracle components what is that i need to install additionally . And if you could provide links to all the required components, it would be great help.
    Also if there is any demo from where i can see what all features CDAA support and how does it compare to other products say IBM commonstore etc , please let me know.
    Thanks a lot ..
    -Rohit

    Can any body help me to say thet "How to install Oracle Applications 11i(11.5.10.2) on Windows 2003 R2 X64 bit ' . Hi,
    I believe, 11i installation on Windows 2003 X64 is not fully supported.
    what is your os version:
    if it is windows 2003 32 bit, then it is supported on X86-64 servers for both database and application tiers
    If it is windows 2003 64 bit, then only datatabase tier is supported on x86-64 servers
    Have a look at the following note
    Frequently Asked Questions: Oracle E-Business Suite Support on x86-64 Doc ID: 343917.1
    https://metalink.oracle.com/metalink/plsql/ml2_documents.showDocument?p_database_id=NOT&p_id=343917.1

  • Oracle 10.1.0.4 on Windows Server 2008 64 bits Standard

    Hello,
    For migratiion purposes, we would need to install Oracle 10.1.4.0 on a Windows Server 2008 64 bits Standard, and then upgrade it to 11g.
    We have forced Oracle 10.2.0.4 installation on a Windows Server 2008 64 bits Standard, but we are not sure for 10.1.0.4.
    Since we don't have that software version to try it and we are looking for it, is it possible to install Oracle 10.1.4.0 on a Windows Server 2008 64 bits Standard?
    Could you point me out a document that reference Oracle versions compatibilty with Windows Server 2008?
    Thanks

    At MOS, click on the certifications tab, then enter database in the first drop down box, and select the rdbms. Then enter the relevant info in the other boxes, and then you will see Oracle Database 10.1.0.4.0 is not certified on Microsoft Windows x64 (64-bit) 2008 R2
    Certification is a little more strict than supported, but extended support ended in January.      REMINDER: Premier Support for Oracle Database 10.1 ends January 2009 [ID 761713.1]
    There's always lifetime support, but your case shows how useful that can be.

  • Unable to Install Windows Server 2012 R2; system aborts and reboots after first blue Windows logo appears

    System:  Dell PowerEdge sc1420 with dual xeon and Adaptec 2420SA SATA RAID (supported by OS); 10 GB memory (2x4, rank 2, organization x4, in DIMM1 & DIMM2; 2x1, registered, organization x8, in DIMM3 & DIMM4)
    This computer is currently running Windows Server 2008 R2 Enterprise which was installed with no problems.
    Objective: clean install of Windows Server 2012 R2 Standard on an otherwise unused RAID array disk set.
    All attempts to boot from DVD result in loading of files (grey progress bar on bottom of screen), brief dark screen, then black screen with a blue windows logo for about 2 seconds and then a flash of about 10 lines of error notifications on a black screen
    for about 1/4 second (unreadable), and then a reboot of the computer.
    Coreinfo.exe confirms that cpus DO support NX and PAE; do NOT support VMX (virtual machine enhancements).
    Attempts to run memtest.exe from boot disk tool-menu startup result in an error message that the memtest.exe file is corrupt.
    Running memtest.exe from Windows 2008 R2 install disk results in all memory tests passed!
    Attempted booting with multiple DVD's (some +R, some -R, all verified) burned from .iso.  These DVD's were used successfully to install Windows Server 2012 R2 on an HP Pavilion.  Also changed DVD drives just to rule out DVD hardware. 
    Running CHKDSK from Windows 2012 R2 on HP Pavilion shows no problems; running CHKDSK from Windows 2008 R2 on the Dell system on the same disks shows some problems.  Running checkdisk on the Windows 2008 R2 install disk from the Windows 2008 R2 installed
    system shows no problems.  All disks burned and verified on same system.
    Also attempted to boot from USB thumbdrive with copy of DVD on it.  Same results: system loads files then reboots at first Windows logo.  So that would rule out disk quality issues per se??
    Started to try an upgrade rather clean install to see if any errors were announced.  None were announced as the system went through much of the process.  I aborted somewhere along the way before committing to the upgrade because 1) the most likely
    outcome was it would not boot after install (I don't really need the practice in restoring); and 2) even if it did reboot, having a system that can't be repaired by booting the install disk is pointless.
    All disks and raid arrays are recognized and usable by RAID controller card and by Windows Server 2008 R2.  Disks are within spec for use with Adaptec 2420SA (1TB @ 300).
    Is VMX (aka VT-x) actaully required for ANY install even though Hyper-V is not intended to be used?  If so, it is too bad that the Microsoft system requirements (
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dn303418.aspx ) don't make that clear.  And lack of VMX support really doesn't explain the memtest.exe "corruption" issue. 
    Or is it maybe something unique about the files on 2012 R2 disk (or disk image on USB) that are causing some problem with the chipset processing?  But why?
    My vote would be for the latter of the issues, but I have no clue why or if it is remediable.  Suggestions? 

    So here is what I think is the final understanding of this problem:
    First, one additional piece of important information:  The computer successfully moves into and through the Windows Boot Loader phase and succeeding phase ONLY for Windows 8.1 32-bit, but NOT for Windows 8.1 64-bit nor for Windows
    Server 2012 R2 (only 64-bit).
    The Windows Boot Manager phase (which precedes the Windows Boot Loader phase) is either 32-bit or 64-bit (64 –bit for this case) and is loaded by the 16-bit stub program (Bootmgr) which starts in real mode. 
    Windows Boot Loader of course runs in either 32-bit or 64-bit (64 –bit for this case) according to the product being installed.
    By inference, the essential problem is occurring in conjunction with the loading of a WIM file to start the Windows Boot Manager. 
    The boot manager starts ok and generally shows its essential screens (Windows Boot Manager; Advanced Boot Options) or proceeds to load files for transition into Windows startup in the succeeding Windows Boot Loader phase (that doesn’t “boot” but rather
    loads the system).  This is best confirmed by the announced corruption of the memtest.exe file when selecting Windows Memory Diagnostic from the Windows Boot Manager Screen. 
    If allowed to continue loading files to pass control to the Windows Boot Manager, the type of abort and resulting immediate restart that occurs is that which you would associate with unhandled cpu exceptions (invalid instruction, memory out of range,
    wild interrupt, etc.) that most of us have not commonly seen for 20 years (since beginning to use well behave OS’s from Windows NT 3.1 and on).
    So, the problem obviously is due to a failure to properly mount the WIM file and/or properly access it (probably the latter) when running in 64-bit protected mode. 
    This is independent of the hardware on which the install disk is actually mounted (DVD or USB-flash), so it is NOT a hardware problem
    per se.
    Since the WIM is mounted early in the process, Boot Manager may well have loaded it using BIOS routines to access the physical device on which it resides rather than loading 32-bit or 64-bit drivers of its own. 
    Hence, if the BIOS does not “mount” the WIM in a way that is later fully compatible with access from the 64-bit systems being loaded, it could cause apparent file corruption. 
    If it is only partially incompatible some functionality may appear quite usable (like loading files) until later detected. 
    This is vague on my part, because the exact nature of the incompatibility cannot be readily determined from the information available. 
    But the consequence is the same: the system cannot boot from the install disk, either for initial installation or repairs.
    Incidental conclusion:  The 64-bit boot manager code for Windows Server 2008 does not exhibit this faulty behavior, but the 64-bit code for Windows Server 2012 does. 
    So the problem is not inherent with loading 64-bit server OS’s.
    Expectations:  If the system were to be upgraded using the features of the install disk while running an installed OS, say Windows Server 2008 R2, it might well succeed and yield a fully functional system upgraded to Windows Server 2012
    R2 (because the installed operating system is started from discrete files, not from a WIM file). 
    However, in order to perform a disaster recovery using Windows resources (such as image backups from Windows Server Backup), one would have to presumably boot from a Windows Server 2012 64-bit install disk or Windows Server USB recovery drive. 
    Of course we know that the Windows Server install disk will not boot and we can be fairly sure that the problem will migrate to any Windows Server USB recovery drive that is created. 
    My inspection of a Windows 7 System Repair CD shows that is based exclusively on boot.wim, not discrete files! 
    Of course a generated image for a WIM for Windows 2012 USB recovery drive
    might not have the flaw that drives this behavior, but it probably would.
    Problem conclusion:  A BIOS upgrade would be required for compatibility with Windows Server 2014 clean installation
    and any maintenance; and none is available from the OEM.
    Problem not resolved, but understood for future reference.
    Thanks to Tim whose comments helped me focus my thinking.

  • Can I install Windows server 2012 r2 in HP Workstation xw4600

    I want to install win srv 2012 r2 in my workstation only for practice , can i install it in hp xw4600

    Hi,
    I agree with Tim that it depends on your computer configuration. Besides, please refer to the requirements for installing Windows server 2012:
    Installing Windows Server 2012
    In addition, the drivers in the link below would be helpful to you:
    Hp Workstation Xw4600 Windows Server 2012 64-bit Drivers
    Note: Microsoft is providing this information as a convenience to
    you. The sites are not controlled by Microsoft. Please make sure that you completely understand the risk before retrieving any suggestions from the above link.
    Best regards,
    Susie

Maybe you are looking for